Intratumoral expression of mature human neutrophil peptide-1 potentiates the therapeutic effect of doxorubicin in a mouse 4T1 breast cancer model
- Authors:
- Published online on: December 30, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2013.2947
- Pages: 1287-1295
Abstract
Introduction
Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is the advanced stage of non-metastatic breast tumors and constitutes ~10–20% of newly diagnosed breast cancers (1). Although the majority of breast cancer patients with early stage disease can be cured by surgery, LABC remains a clinical challenge. Despite appropriate therapy, the majority of patients with LABC develop distant metastasis and experience cancer relapse. The treatment of LABC requires a combination of chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy. Chemotherapy can effectively prevent the occurrence of tumor cell dissemination and metastasis (2). In particular, the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is necessary for LABC patients; it can render inoperable tumors resectable and increases the rate of breast-conserving therapy (3).
Doxorubicin (Dox), one of the most effective anticancer chemotherapeutics, is commonly used in breast cancer chemotherapy. However, its clinical use is restricted by intrinsic or acquired multidrug resistance (MDR) and dose-dependent toxicity. As the major barrier to successful chemotherapy, MDR is often associated with the overexpression of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters in cancer cells. ABC transporters transduce the energy of ATP binding and hydrolysis into mechanical energy to translocate substrates across plasma membranes (4). By transporter-mediated drug efflux, cancer cells escape from chemotherapy caused injury.
Human α-defensins (HNP1-4) are small cationic antimicrobial peptides (CAPs) that are expressed mainly in neutrophils but also in specific subsets of T cells, monocytes and NK cells (5–7). Among them HNP1-3 possess a high degree of similarity in amino acid sequence and bioactivity. Deregulated expression and secretion of HNP1-3 have been detected in many types of human tumors (8–13), including lung and breast cancer (12,13). Further investigations have found that tumor cell lines (8) and microdissected fresh tumor cells (10) express HNP1-3. At present, the influence of intratumorally expressed HNP1-3 on cancer therapy is unknown.
Studies have reported that HNP1-3 are cytotoxic to a variety of tumor cells (14–16). Previously, we observed that intracellularly expressed HNP1 increased plasma membrane permeability in human A549 lung carcinoma cells (17). We also noted that the intratumoral expression of HNP1 mediated specific angiogenesis inhibition in vivo (17,18). In addition, HNP1 can cause VEGF-dependent endothelial cell proliferation inhibition by forming a ternary complex with fibronectin and α5β1 integrin (19). In addition, there are reports that inhibition of VEGF-mediated angiogenesis can improve chemotherapy efficacy via inducing tumor microvessel normalization (20,21). Based on these findings, we speculated that the intratumoral expression of HNP1 may play a beneficial role in cancer chemotherapy.
In the present study, we aimed to investigate the potential influence of intratumorally expressed HNP1 on breast cancer chemotherapy. We established a 4T1 tumor mouse model to imitate LABC, and we used treatment with combined therapy of HNP1 and Dox. The effect of the combination treatment was determined, and the possible mechanisms were probed. Our study suggests that intratumoral expression of HNP1 can significantly improve the therapeutic efficacy of Dox in breast cancer, abrogate the influence of multidrug resistance and enhance medication safety. HNP1 may function as a promising alternative to enhance the clinical chemotherapeutic response.
Materials and methods
Animals and tumor cell lines
Female BALB/c and female nude mice, 6–8 weeks of age, were purchased from the West China Experimental Animal Center (Chengdu, China). Mouse mammary carcinoma cell line 4T1 and human lung adenocarcinoma cell line A549 were purchased from ATCC and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (both from Invitrogen Life Technologies) and penicillin-streptomycin. The cell cultures were maintained in a humidified chamber at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere. The handling of mice and experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with protocols of the Ethics Committee of Sichuan University.
MTT cell viability assay
Cell viability was assessed by the MTT assay. Doxorubicin hydrochloride (Meiji Co.) was freshly prepared before each experiment. A recombinant plasmid pSecTag-HNP1 (pHNP1) that expresses a secretable form of mature HNP1 was previously constructed (17) and used in the present study. The concentration of MTT (Sigma) solution was 5 mg/ml dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). An untreated group, a Dox group, a pHNP1 group, and a pHNP1 plus Dox group were designed for this experiment. The 4T1 cells were seeded on 96-well plates at a density of 5×103 cells/well in 200 μl DMEM medium and were allowed to adhere by incubation overnight. Then 0.2 μg pHNP1 was transfected in the combined group and the pHNP1 group, using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies). Transfection was conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Twelve hours later, different concentrations of Dox were added to the culture medium. After a 36-h incubation with Dox, MTT assay was conducted. The absorbance value of solution in each well was measured using a spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific) at 570 nm. Experiments were repeated 3 times. The absorbance value of the untreated cells was considered to be 100%. The percentage of cell viability was determined by comparison with the untreated control.
Analysis of apoptosis
For the detection of apoptosis, 4T1 cells were seeded into 6-well plates at a density of 2×105, which were divided into a pHNP1 group, a Dox group, a pHNP1 plus Dox group and an untreated group. When cultured to 50% confluence, cells in the pHNP1 group and the combined group were transfected with 2 μg pHNP1. Transfection was conducted as mentioned above. Twelve hours after transfection was carried out, Dox was added at a final concentration of 1 μg/ml. Twenty-four hours later, both attached and floating cells were harvested and washed twice with PBS. After that, cells were resuspended and stained with the Annexin V-FITC kit (KeyGen). Apoptosis of cells was analyzed by a flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).
Detection of intracellular Dox accumulation
Intracellular Dox accumulation was detected according to Bruno and Slate (22). In this experiment, 4T1 cells were seeded into 6-well plates at a density of 2×105 cells/well, which were divided into a Dox group, a pHNP1 plus Dox group and an untreated group. When cultured to 50% confluence, cells in the combined group were transfected with 2 μg pHNP1 as mentioned above. Twelve hours after transfection was carried out, Dox was added at a final concentration of 1 μg/ml. After 2 h of incubation in a humidified chamber, 4T1 cells from each well were harvested and washed twice with PBS. After that, cells were resuspended in 200 μl PBS, and fluorescent intensity was detected by a flow cytometer.
Determination of mitochondrial transmembrane potential
For the detection of mitochondrial transmembrane potential (ΔΨm), Rhodamine 123 (Rh123; Sigma) staining was conducted. Briefly, 4T1 cells were seeded into 6-well plates at a density of 2×105, and were divided into a pHNP1 group, a Dox group, a pHNP1 plus Dox group and an untreated group. When cultured to 50% confluence, cells in the pHNP1 group and the combination group were transfected with 2 μg pHNP1 as mentioned above. Twelve hours after transfection was conducted, Dox was added at a final concentration of 1 μg/ml. Twenty-four hours later, cells were harvested and washed twice with PBS. After that, cells were resuspended in 1 μg/ml Rh123 solution and incubated for 10 min at 37°C. The stained cells were then washed twice and resuspended in 200 μl PBS. Fluorescent intensity was detected by a flow cytometer.
Tumor models and treatment
To detect the in vivo combination effect, 4T1 breast carcinoma and A549 lung adenocarcinoma models were established. For the 4T1 model, 3×105 4T1 cells were injected subcutaneously into the right dorsal flank of BALB/c mice. When the tumor diameter reached 7–8 mm, mice were randomly divided into a pHNP1 group, a Dox group, a pSec (empty vector) group, a combination group and a glucose (GS) group. Each group included 10 mice and each mouse was injected intratumorally and around the tumor with pHNP1 (100 μg), pSec (100 μg) or GS (100 μl). The DNA was encapsulated in cationic liposome with a ratio of 1:3 and administered once every 3 days in a volume of 100 μl for a total of 5 times. Dox was administered intravenously (i.v.) on day 1 and 8 at 5 mg/kg body weight. The control group received an injection of 100 μl 5% glucose solution. For the A549 model, 5×106 A549 cells were implanted subcutaneously into the right dorsal flank of nude mice. When the tumor diameter reached 5 mm, mice were randomly divided into 4 groups with 5 mice/group. DNA was administered as mentioned above. DDP was injected i.v. on day 1 and 8 at 5 mg/kg body weight. Tumor growth was evaluated by measurement of tumor diameters every 3 days and tumor volume was calculated as length × width2 × 0.52. For ethical reasons, experiments were terminated when tumor volume reached 2,000 mm3. Metastasis of the 4T1 tumors was evaluated by counting the lung metastatic nodules.
Tumor microvessel detection
To observe intratumoral microvessel change and avoid possible influence of the plasmid vector, 4T1 cells were injected subcutaneously into the right dorsal flank of BALB/c mice. When the tumor diameter reached 7–8 mm, a commercially mature HNP1 peptide (Abcam) was injected intratumorally once a day for a total of 3 times at a dose of 2 μg. Tumor tissues were harvested on day 4, and the ultrastructure of the tumor microvessels was observed by transmission electron microscopy. For specimen preparation, tumor tissues were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 mol/l PBS (pH 7.4) and then dehydrated in a graded series of acetone and embedded in Epon 812. Tumor microvessels were orientated and identified in semi-thin sections (1 μm) that were stained with toluidine blue. Ultra-thin sections (70 nm) were post-stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined under an H-7650 electron microscope (Hitachi) at 80 kV. Images were captured by electron microscopy and analyzed.
TUNEL assay
For in vivo apoptosis detection, tumor tissues were removed from the tumor-bearing mice 48 h after the last treatment and fixed with freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4). After fixation, tumor tissues were dehydrated and embedded into paraffin. Paraffin sections (4 μm) were constructed by a paraffin slicing machine (Leica, RM2235). Staining was performed using the protocol supplied with the Promega terminal deoxynucleotidyl-transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay kit.
Statistical analysis
SPSS 11.5 was used for statistical analysis. The statistical significance of results in all experiments was determined by Student’s t-test and ANOVA. The findings were regarded as significant at P<0.05.
Results
HNP1 potentiates Dox-mediated 4T1 cell proliferation inhibition and apoptosis in vitro
To determine the influence of HNP1 on Dox-mediated cell growth inhibition and apoptosis, MTT assay and Annexin V-FITC staining were conducted. To avoid the possible influence of chemotherapeutics on HNP1 expression, Dox was added 12 h after transfection was carried out. For detection of proliferation, in the pHNP1 group and the pHNP1 plus Dox group, 4T1 cells were transfected with pHNP1. Then Dox was added to the cells in the Dox group and the pHNP1 plus Dox group at gradient concentrations (0–6 μg/ml). After 36 h of incubation with Dox, MTT assay was carried out. The 4T1 cells treated with Dox alone showed dose-dependent growth inhibition, and the concentration showing 50% growth inhibition in culture (IC50) was ~3.5 μg/ml. Following the combined treatment, this concentration decreased to 1 μg/ml (Fig. 1A).
The quantitative assessment of apoptosis was conducted by PI and Annexin V-FITC double staining and was evaluated by flow cytometry (Fig. 1B). 4T1 cells were transfected with pHNP1 and Dox was added at a concentration of 1 μg/ml. Twenty-four hours later, both attached and floating cells were harvested and stained. Analysis showed that 4T1 cells treated with the combination of pHNP1 and Dox (51.5%) had a significantly increased apoptosis rate (Q2 + Q4) when compared with the rate of cells treated with pHNP1 (20.6%) or Dox (11.1%) alone (Fig. 1C). The apoptotic rate following combination treatment was greater than the sum of the rates following each treatment alone, suggesting that the usage of pHNP1 and Dox together had a synergistic effect.
HNP1 enhances intracellular Dox accumulation in 4T1 cells
Dox has autofluorescent properties that enable the evaluation of drug accumulation by flow cytometry. The intracellular concentration of chemotherapeutics is closely related to the therapeutic effect. To explore the possible mechanism of HNP1-mediated cytotoxicity enhancement, 4T1 cells were treated with Dox and detected for intracellular fluorescent intensity. In this experiment, 12 h after pHNP1 transfection, Dox was added at a concentration of 1 μg/ml and incubated for 2 h. Flow cytometric analysis showed that, compared with the Dox group, 4T1 cells in the pHNP1 plus Dox group exhibited an increase in both the percentage of cells with fluorescence and intracellular fluorescent intensity (Fig. 2). This finding indicated that the treatment of pHNP1 caused an enhancement of intracellular accumulated Dox in 4T1 cells.
HNP1 causes dissipation of mitochondrial transmembrane potential in 4T1 cells
The internalization of HNP1-3 may disrupt the membrane integrity of cancer cell mitochondria (23). We therefore employed the fluorescent dye Rh123, which localizes to intact mitochondria, to determine the effect of HNP1 on mitochondrial membrane integrity. Fig. 3 shows that 4T1 cells in the pHNP1 group exhibited a significant decrease in Rh123 fluorescent intensity (P2). The combination treatment of pHNP1 and Dox caused a further decrease. In contrast, Dox had no significant influence on ΔΨm. Our findings indicate that pHNP1 treatment results in the loss of mitochondrial membrane integrity and dissipation of ΔΨm.
HNP1 augments the chemosensitivity of Dox and DDP in vivo
To further explore the in vivo effect of the combination therapy, we established 4T1 breast carcinoma and A549 human lung adenocarcinoma models. 4T1 breast cancer cells have high metastatic potential. We and others found that apparent tumor metastasis could be monitored in BALB/c mice when the tumor diameter reached 10 mm (24). To imitate the therapy of LABC, we inoculated 4T1 cells into the right dorsal flank of BALB/c mice and began treatment when the tumor diameter reached 7–8 mm. A low dose of Dox (5 mg/kg body weight) was administered i.v. on day 1 and 8. In the A549 model, treatment was started when the tumor diameter was 5 mm. pHNP1 and DDP were administered at the same dose and frequency as in the 4T1 model. Treatment with a combination of pHNP1 significantly augmented the therapeutic effect of chemotherapeutics in the 4T1 (Fig. 4A) and A549 (Fig. 4B) models. These results indicate that HNP1 enhanced the antitumor activity of the chemotherapy drugs in vivo. In both of the experiments, no obvious side-effect of the combination therapy was observed.
Combined treatment inhibits the metastasis of 4T1 breast cancer
4T1 breast cancer cells possess high potential for metastasis and can metastasize to several organs, particularly the lung. Lung metastasis of 4T1 cells in BALB/c mice occurs at a high frequency and can better represent the extent of tumor spreading (24). For these considerations, when the 4T1 cell tumor volume reached 2,000 mm3, mice were sacrificed, and lung metastasis was examined under a dissecting microscope. The pHNP1 and Dox showed a similar effect of metastasis inhibition. However, mice that received a combined treatment of Dox and pHNP1 had significantly less lung metastatic nodes. Representative images of lungs are shown in Fig. 5A. The results of the analysis are expressed as the average number of metastatic nodules (Fig. 5B).
Intratumoral expression of HNP1 promotes tumor microvessel normalization
Tumor vasculature is characteristically disorganized with unstructured morphology, resulting in increased interstitial pressure and poor perfusion in tumors (25). This vasculature within tumors becomes a key obstacle for efficient drug delivery (26,27). VEGF signaling plays an important role in tumor angiogenesis. Inhibition of VEGF or its kinase receptors (VEGFRs) could result in tumor vasculature normalization (20,21). It has been reported that HNP1 impairs VEGF-mediated angiogenesis (19,28). To detect the influence of HNP1 on tumor microvessels, a commercial HNP1 peptide was injected intratumorally, and ultrastructural changes were observed by transmission electron microscopy. The untreated tumors exhibited an obvious structural abnormality, accompanied by strong activity of vascular endothelium sprouting, discontinuous vascular basement membrane (BM) and irregular lumen of blood vessels (Fig. 6). In contrast, in the HNP1-treated group, tumor vessels were lined by an orderly formed single endothelial cell (EC) monolayer, which was continuous and tightly packed, with a normal polarity and intact BM (Fig. 6). Our observations suggest that the intratumoral expression of HNP1 promotes the normalization of tumor microvessels.
Combined treatment mediates increased tumor cell apoptosis in vivo
To evaluate the in vivo apoptosis of tumor cells, tumor tissues were removed 48 h after the last treatment, and in situ TUNEL staining was conducted. The TUNEL assay showed that the combination treatment resulted in a significantly higher number of apoptotic cells when compared to the number following the single treatment (Fig. 7). Similar results were also observed in the A549 model (data not shown).
Discussion
CAPs are a class of natural-source cationic peptides and important components of the innate immune system (29,30). In vitro, CAPs exhibit selective cytotoxicity against a broad spectrum of human cancer cells (14,31–37) and this cytotoxic effect was equivalent when tested against sensitive and MDR cell lines (32,35–37). It was also reported that certain CAPs enhance the tumor killing activity of chemotherapeutic agents (34,35,37). In the treatment of leukemia cells, cecropin A showed a synergistic effect when combined with S-Fu and ara-c (34). In another study of MDR tumor cells, mammalian-derived extended-helical cationic peptides and insect-derived α-helical peptides significantly augmented the in vitro activity of Dox (35). Despite these findings, little is known about the in vivo influence of CAPs on chemotherapy and the possible mechanisms involved.
As members of the CAP family, HNP1-3 are highly similar in regards to bioactivities and are overexpressed in a variety of human tumors (8–13). In the present study, we showed for the first time that intratumorally expressed HNP1 augments the chemosensitivity of Dox in mouse 4T1 breast cancer. This chemosensitization effect was also noted in a human A549 lung cancer model treated with pHNP1 and DDP. Further investigations showed that the possible mechanisms involved significantly increased cancer cell apoptosis, augmented intracellular drug accumulation, decreased mitochondrial transmembrane potential (ΔΨm), impaired tumor metastasis and intratumoral vasculature normalization. We suggest that our findings may be important for clinical chemotherapeutic strategies.
LABC is the advanced stage of non-metastatic breast cancer. Even following proper treatment, most LABC patients still develop distant metastasis and experience cancer relapse. The clinical treatment of LABC requires a combination of therapeutic strategies, in particular, the administration of chemotherapeutics. Chemotherapy can prevent the occurrence of tumor cell dissemination and metastasis (2). In particular, the application of neoadjuvant chemotherapy can effectively reduce tumor burden and greatly enhance the rate of breast-conserving therapy of LABC patients (3). As one of the most effective chemotherapeutic drugs, Dox is commonly used against breast cancer; however, its clinical use is impeded by dose-dependent toxicity and MDR. 4T1 breast cancer cells have a high metastatic potential. In BALB/c mice, apparent tumor metastasis is monitored when tumor diameter is ~10 mm (24). In the present study, we established a 4T1 tumor model to imitate LABC, and treatment began when the tumor diameter reached 7–8 mm. The clinically relevant dose of Dox was 10 mg/kg (30 mg/m2). In this experiment, mice were administered i.v. a lower dose of 5 mg/kg weight twice on day 1 and 8. We found that HNP1 significantly augmented the therapeutic effect of Dox and impaired tumor metastasis, accompanied by no obvious side-effects. This combination therapeutic strategy exhibited a more beneficial effect than each single treatment alone and decreased chemotherapeutic consumption. We suggest that HNP1 may provide a promising alternative to overcome the systemic side-effect of chemotherapeutics and improve medication safety.
There are many reasons that contribute to cancer cell survival during chemotherapy: increased drug efflux, enhanced repair/increased tolerance to DNA damage, high anti-apoptotic potential and decreased permeability. MDR is one of the major causes of chemotherapy failure in the clinical treatment of breast cancer, and is closely related with overexpression of ABC transporters (38) such as BCRP/ABCG2 (39). ABC transporters confer a drug-resistant phenotype by decreasing intracellular accumulation of chemotherapeutic drugs via ATP-dependent efflux mechanisms (40). Previously, we found that HNP1 increased plasma membrane permeability in A549 cells (17). In the present research, the intracellular expression of HNP1 caused enhancement of Dox accumulation in 4T1 cells and exhibited a synergistic apoptosis-inducing effect in combination therapy. We also showed that HNP1 mediated the dissipation of ΔΨm in 4T1 cells. It is reported that deprivation of cellular energy supply is an effective way to overcome MDR (41). The collapse of mitochondrial ΔΨm causes an uncoupling of the respiratory chain, and in this regard, HNP1 could greatly impair the energy source of ABC transporters and consequently breakdown of MDR. Based on these findings, we conclude that HNP1 enhances chemosensitivity by increasing the entrance of chemotherapeutics and at the same time decreasing drug efflux. Additionally, a previous study found that overexpression of anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 did not affect HNP1-induced cell death in A549 cells (23). In addition, drastic membrane disruption function by HNP1 makes it difficult for cancer cells to develop resistance. Therefore, the administration of HNP1 is not easily influenced by apoptosis evasion or causes drug resistance. Our findings indicated that HNP1 may function as an effective chemosensitizer to overcome chemotherapy failure.
Modulation of intratumoral vasculature has been postulated as a method for improving drug delivery to solid tumors (42). Tumor vessels are tortuous and dilated, lack pericyte coverage and exhibit an abnormal basement membrane (43–45). Vessel normalization within tumors could result in increased drug perfusion and a higher sensitivity to standard chemotherapy and immunotherapy (46,47). VEGF signaling plays an important role in tumor angiogenesis. Inhibition of VEGF or its kinase receptors (VEGFRs) can cause normalization of tumor vasculature (20,21). It is reported that HNP1 could impair VEGF-mediated angiogenesis (19,28). In the present study, to avoid the influence of the plasmid vector on angiogenesis, a mature HNP1 peptide was injected intratumorally in the 4T1 tumors and normalized microvessels of orderly formed EC monolayer were observed after treatment. Our findings revealed that the intratumorally expressed HNP1 also potentiated chemotherapy by inducing vasculature normalization in 4T1 tumor tissues.
In our previous investigations, intratumorally expressed HNP1 exhibited multiple antitumor effects in vivo, and in particular, mediated host immune responses to tumors (18). Considering the impact of tumor burden on the potential efficacy of immunotherapy, in animal experiments, pHNP1 was administered when the tumor diameter reached 4 mm. In the present research, to imitate LABC in a 4T1 tumor model and better investigate the relationship of HNP1 and chemotherapy, treatment started when the tumor diameter reached ~7–8 mm. As shown in Fig. 5, a single treatment of Dox (5 mg/kg body weight) did not effectively inhibit tumor growth. In contrast, the combined therapy significantly delayed 4T1 tumor growth early in treatment when compared with the other groups. This chemosensitization effect was similar in the A549 model which was established in nude mice injected with DDP. However, the combination therapeutic effect did not reach significance under early intervention as in the 4T1 model. We conclude that an HNP-mediated host immune response may not play the major role in its chemosensitization function.
In summary, our research provides evidence that the expression of HNP1 in tumors may play a beneficial role in chemotherapy. Gene therapy based on HNP1 may provide an attractive alternative for cancer chemosensitization.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Major Project 2011ZX09302-001-01, and by the National Natural Science Foundation (NSFC81272523).
References
Franceschini G, Terribile D, Magno S, et al: Update in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer: a multidisciplinary approach. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 11:283–289. 2007.PubMed/NCBI | |
Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, et al: Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 353:1784–1792. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schott AF and Hayes DF: Defining the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 30:1747–1749. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dong J, Yang G and McHaourab HS: Structural basis of energy transduction in the transport cycle of MsbA. Science. 308:1023–1028. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Agerberth B, Charo J, Werr J, et al: The human antimicrobial and chemotactic peptides LL-37 and α-defensins are expressed by specific lymphocyte and monocyte populations. Blood. 96:3086–3093. 2000. | |
Obata-Onai A, Hashimoto S, Onai N, et al: Comprehensive gene expression analysis of human NK cells and CD8+ T lymphocytes. Int Immunol. 14:1085–1098. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ganz T, Selsted ME and Lehrer RI: Defensins. Eur J Haematol. 44:1–8. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Müller CA, Markovic-Lipkovski J, Klatt T, et al: Human α-defensins HNPs-1, -2, and -3 in renal cell carcinoma: influences on tumor cell proliferation. Am J Pathol. 160:1311–1324. 2002. | |
Lundy FT, Orr DF, Gallagher JR, et al: Identification and overexpression of human neutrophil α-defensins (human neutrophil peptides 1, 2 and 3) in squamous cell carcinomas of the human tongue. Oral Oncol. 40:139–144. 2004. | |
Melle C, Ernst G, Schimmel B, et al: Discovery and identification of α-defensins as low abundant, tumor-derived serum markers in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 129:66–73. 2005. | |
Holterman DA, Diaz JI, Blackmore PF, et al: Overexpression of α-defensin is associated with bladder cancer invasiveness. Urol Oncol. 24:97–108. 2006. | |
Bateman A, Singh A, Jothy S, Fraser R, Esch F and Solomon S: The levels and biologic action of the human neutrophil granule peptide HP-1 in lung tumors. Peptides. 13:133–139. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li J, Zhao J, Yu X, et al: Identification of biomarkers for breast cancer in nipple aspiration and ductal lavage fluid. Clin Cancer Res. 11:8312–8320. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lichtenstein A, Ganz T, Selsted ME and Lehrer RI: In vitro tumor cell cytolysis mediated by peptide defensins of human and rabbit granulocytes. Blood. 68:1407–1410. 1986.PubMed/NCBI | |
Barker E and Reisfeld RA: A mechanism for neutrophil-mediated lysis of human neuroblastoma cells. Cancer Res. 53:362–367. 1993.PubMed/NCBI | |
McKeown ST, Lundy FT, Nelson J, et al: The cytotoxic effects of human neutrophil peptide-1 (HNP1) and lactoferrin on oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in vitro. Oral Oncol. 42:685–690. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu N, Wang YS, Pan WB, et al: Human α-defensin-1 inhibits growth of human lung adenocarcinoma xenograft in nude mice. Mol Cancer Ther. 7:1588–1597. 2008. | |
Wang YS, Li D, Shi HS, et al: Intratumoral expression of mature human neutrophil peptide-1 mediates antitumor immunity in mice. Clin Cancer Res. 15:6901–6911. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chavakis T, Cines DB, Rhee JS, et al: Regulation of neovascularization by human neutrophil peptides (α-defensins): a link between inflammation and angiogenesis. FASEB J. 18:1306–1308. 2004. | |
Shen G, Li Y, Du T, et al: SKLB1002, a novel inhibitor of VEGF receptor 2 signaling, induces vascular normalization to improve systemically administered chemotherapy efficacy. Neoplasma. 59:486–493. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dickson PV, Hamner JB, Sims TL, et al: Bevacizumab-induced transient remodeling of the vasculature in neuroblastoma xenografts results in improved delivery and efficacy of systemically administered chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 13:3942–3950. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bruno NA and Slate DL: Effect of exposure to calcium entry blockers on doxorubicin accumulation and cytotoxicity in multidrug-resistant cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 82:419–424. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Aarbiou J, Tjabringa GS, Verhoosel RM, et al: Mechanisms of cell death induced by the neutrophil antimicrobial peptides α-defensins and LL-37. Inflamm Res. 55:119–127. 2006. | |
Pulaski BA, Terman DS, Khan S, Muller E and Ostrand-Rosenberg S: Cooperativity of Staphylococcal aureus enterotoxin B superantigen, major histocompatibility complex class II, and CD80 for immunotherapy of advanced spontaneous metastases in a clinically relevant postoperative mouse breast cancer model. Cancer Res. 60:2710–2715. 2000. | |
Boucher Y, Baxter LT and Jain RK: Interstitial pressure gradients in tissue-isolated and subcutaneous tumors: implications for therapy. Cancer Res. 50:4478–4484. 1990. | |
Minchinton AI and Tannock IF: Drug penetration in solid tumours. Nat Rev Cancer. 6:583–592. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jang SH, Wientjes MG, Lu D and Au JL: Drug delivery and transport to solid tumors. Pharm Res. 20:1337–1350. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Economopoulou M, Bdeir K, Cines DB, et al: Inhibition of pathologic retinal neovascularization by α-defensins. Blood. 106:3831–3838. 2005. | |
Zasloff M: Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature. 415:389–395. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
McPhee JB and Hancock RE: Function and therapeutic potential of host defence peptides. J Pept Sci. 11:677–687. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mader JS, Salsman J, Conrad DM and Hoskin DW: Bovine lactoferricin selectively induces apoptosis in human leukemia and carcinoma cell lines. Mol Cancer Ther. 4:612–624. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Moore AJ, Devine DA and Bibby MC: Preliminary experimental anticancer activity of cecropins. Pept Res. 7:265–269. 1994.PubMed/NCBI | |
Jacob L and Zasloff M: Potential therapeutic applications of magainins and other antimicrobial agents of animal origin. Ciba Found Symp. 186:197–216. 1994.PubMed/NCBI | |
Hui L, Leung K and Chen HM: The combined effects of antibacterial peptide cecropin A and anti-cancer agents on leukemia cells. Anticancer Res. 22:2811–2816. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
Johnstone SA, Gelmon K, Mayer LD, Hancock RE and Bally MB: In vitro characterization of the anticancer activity of membrane-active cationic peptides. I. Peptide-mediated cytotoxicity and peptide-enhanced cytotoxic activity of doxorubicin against wild-type and P-glycoprotein over-expressing tumor cell lines. Anticancer Drug Des. 15:151–160. 2000. | |
Lincke CR, van der Bliek AM, Schuurhuis GJ, van der Velde-Koerts T, Smit JJ and Borst P: Multidrug resistance phenotype of human BRO melanoma cells transfected with a wild-type human mdr1 complementary DNA. Cancer Res. 50:1779–1785. 1990.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ohsaki Y, Gazdar AF, Chen HC and Johnson BE: Antitumor activity of magainin analogues against human lung cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 52:3534–3538. 1992.PubMed/NCBI | |
Fojo AT and Menefee M: Microtubule targeting agents: basic mechanisms of multidrug resistance (MDR). Semin Oncol. 32(Suppl 7): S3–S8. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Doyle L and Ross DD: Multidrug resistance mediated by the breast cancer resistance protein BCRP (ABCG2). Oncogene. 22:7340–7358. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gottesman MM, Fojo T and Bates SE: Multidrug resistance in cancer: role of ATP-dependent transporters. Nat Rev Cancer. 2:48–58. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu RH, Pelicano H, Zhou Y, et al: Inhibition of glycolysis in cancer cells: a novel strategy to overcome drug resistance associated with mitochondrial respiratory defect and hypoxia. Cancer Res. 65:613–621. 2005. | |
Winkler F, Kozin SV, Tong RT, et al: Kinetics of vascular normalization by VEGFR2 blockade governs brain tumor response to radiation: role of oxygenation, angiopoietin-1, and matrix metalloproteinases. Cancer Cell. 6:553–563. 2004. | |
Baluk P, Morikawa S, Haskell A, Mancuso M and McDonald DM: Abnormalities of basement membrane on blood vessels and endothelial sprouts in tumors. Am J Pathol. 163:1801–1815. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Morikawa S, Baluk P, Kaidoh T, Haskell A, Jain RK and McDonald DM: Abnormalities in pericytes on blood vessels and endothelial sprouts in tumors. Am J Pathol. 160:985–1000. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Adams RH and Alitalo K: Molecular regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 8:464–478. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Goel S, Duda DG, Xu L, et al: Normalization of the vasculature for treatment of cancer and other diseases. Physiol Rev. 91:1071–1121. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang Y, Yuan J, Righi E, et al: Vascular normalizing doses of antiangiogenic treatment reprogram the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and enhance immunotherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 109:17561–17566. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |