Silencing STAT3 with short hairpin RNA enhances radiosensitivity of human laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma xenografts in vivo
- Authors:
- Published online on: September 29, 2010 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2010.156
- Pages: 947-953
Abstract
Introduction
Radiotherapy is a crucial treatment method in the management of human laryngeal carcinoma. Unfortunately, in some cases, little tumor-controlling efficacy is achieved by radiation alone (1,2), due to the inherent radioresistance of this tumor. The development of new strategies to improve the sensitivity to radiotherapy of cancer is absolutely necessary. For this purpose, in recent years, potential targets for therapeutic intervention of therapy-resistant cancers have been extensively studied. Among the various related factors investigated, signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) is an important potential therapeutic target.
Physiologically, STAT3 has diverse biological functions, including the modulation of cell growth and cell differentiation, and the regulation of apoptosis (3–5). Moreover, STAT3 has been shown to be constitutively activated in various types of human cancer and to be necessary for tumor cell growth (6). In human cancer, STAT3 participates in oncogenesis through the modulation of p53 expression (7), the regulation of cell cycle control genes, including C-Myc (8–10) and cyclinD1/D2 (11), the up-regulation of genes encoding apoptosis inhibitors, such as B cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), Bcl-xL, survivin and Mcl-1 (5,12–15), and the induction of angiogenesis by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (13,16).
Radiosensitivity is affected by changes in the cell cycle, programmed cell death, DNA injury repair, and other mechanisms regulated by oncogenes after radiation. In view of the fact that many factors related to the tumor cell cycle, apoptosis and DNA injury repair are downstream of the STAT3 pathway, we hypothesized that STAT3 may be involved in cancer radioresistance.
In our previous study (17), we successfully demonstrated that the apoptosis of hep-2 cells is significantly increased by blocking the STAT3 pathway with short hairpin RNA (shRNA) combined with radiation in vitro, indicating the potential radiosensitization effects of STAT3 shRNA-based RNA interference (RNAi). This is a new technique that inhibits mRNA expression by inducing the sequence-specific destruction of homologous mRNA in cells with small interference RNA (siRNA). Here, to confirm our previous findings, a xenograft model of human laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma was established in nude mice, and a constructed recombinant plasmid vector carrying human STAT3 shRNA was transfected into the tumor-bearing mice followed by radiation, with the aim of examining its efficacy in the inhibition of tumor growth. The results demonstrate that shRNA targeting STAT3 potentiate the radiosensitivity of human laryngeal carcinoma xenografts in vivo.
Materials and methods
Reagents
RPMI-1640 media, Opti-MEMI and Lipofectamine 2000 were purchased from Invitrogen Corp. (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Plasmid pGPU6/GFP/Neo and siRNA oligonucleotides were provided by Gene Pharma Corporation (Shanghai, China). The target region of STAT3 siRNA was selected and recombinant plasmids were constructed according to our previous study (17). The Wizard® Plus Megapreps DNA Purification System was purchased from Promega (USA). The AMV First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit and primers were products of Sangon Biological Engineering Technology and Services Corp. (Shanghai, China). STAT3, p-STAT3 and Bcl-2 mouse monoclonal antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Rabbit anti-human p53 polyclonal antibody was obtained from Seitz Biological Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) and Rabbit anti-human VEGF polyclonal antibody was from Boster Biological Technology, Ltd. (Wuhan, China). CD34 mouse monoclonal antibody, the SP kit and DAB developer were from Zhongshan Goldenbridge Bio-technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Propidium iodide was purchased from Sigma (USA).
Tumor transfection and treatment
Male BALB/c nude mice, aged 4–5 weeks and weighing 12–18 g, were obtained from the Medical Department of Peking University Laboratory Animal Center (Beijing, China) and housed under specific pathogen-free conditions at the Bethune International Peace Hospital (Shijiazhuang, China) in accordance with the National Regulations on Animal Experiments and Animal Welfare. To generate the tumor xenografts, 2×106 viable hep-2 cells were subcutaneously injected into the right-side back of the mice. When tumors reached a volume of ∼150 mm3 (on day 14), 28 tumor-bearing mice were randomly divided into four groups: the negative control group (pshNeg), tumors injected with negative plasmid; the STAT3 siRNA group (pshSTAT3), tumors treated with STAT3 shRNA recombinant plasmid alone, without irradiation; the irradiation group (IR), tumors exposed to radiation alone, with 5 Gy of γ-rays per irradiation; the combination group (pshSTAT3 plus IR), tumors treated with STAT3 shRNA recombinant plasmid combined with irradiation as above.
To perform the in vivo gene transfection, the mice in the pshNeg, pshSTAT3, and pshSTAT3 plus IR groups were intratu-morally injected with a 200 μl mixture of plasmid (20 μg/20 μl plasmid + 50 μl Lipofectamine + 130 μl serum-free RPMI-1640 culture medium). The mice in the IR group were injected with the same amount of control mixture (50 μl Lipofectamine + 150 μl serum-free RPMI-1640 culture medium). Intratumoral injection was performed on days 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 21, with day 0 representing the first day of injection. To test the transfection efficiency, fresh tumor cells were obtained at 48 h post-transfection from a separate group of animals in a parallel single transfection experiment, and the transfection efficiency was measured by flow cytometry (FCM). On days 2, 5, 8 and 11 of the planned treatment scheme, radiotherapy was performed with γ-rays on the tumors only using a 60Co unit, with the animals immobilized and biologically isolated from ambient air using a special device. The remaining parts of the animals were protected by a 1-cm thick stereotype. Projectile’s Ueno Area was 4×4 cm, with a source tumor distance of 100 cm and an absorbed dose rate of 78.79 cGy/min. Tumor volumes were estimated four times weekly according to the formula v = a2b/2, where a and b are the shortest and longest diameter, respectively (18). Upon termination of the experiment, the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, and the tumors were excised for weighing, immunohistochemistry and FCM. Tumor growth inhibition rates were calculated using the formula (1 - average tumor weight of experimental group/average tumor weight of control group) × 100%.
Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis
The cell suspension was prepared from fresh tumor tissues. Total RNA was extracted from 1×106 fresh tumor cells using TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT-PCR was performed using the two-step method. cDNA was synthesized according to the protocol of the AMV First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit. STAT3 gene primers were: forward, 5′-gtcagatgccaaatgc-3′; reverse, 5′-cctggaggcttagtgc-3′. β-actin primers were: forward, 5′-GCATGGGTGCCCCGACGTTG-3′; reverse, 5′-GCTCCG GCCAGAGGCCTCAA-3′. The PCR reaction was performed using a PCR instrument (UNOII, Biometra, Germany). The reaction conditions were: 95°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles at 95°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 45 sec, 72°C for 60 sec, and a final elongation at 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were separated on a 2% agarose gel, and visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
Gene expression analysis and intratumoral microvessel density (MVD)
Tumor tissues were fixed in 4% paraformalde-hyde and embedded in paraffin, then 4-mm sections were cut and prepared. Immunohistochemical stainning was performed according to the standard protocol of the SP kit. In brief, after dewaxing and rehydration, the sections were subjected to heat-induced antigen retrieval in a high pressure cooker, quenched in reagent A (3% H2O2 methanol) for 10 min to remove endogenous peroxidase activity, washed in PBS, and then incubated with normal goat serum for 30 min to block non-specific binding sites. Subsequently, the sections were incubated with primary antibodies (STAT3, p-STAT3, Bcl-2, p53, VEGF and CD34) overnight at 4°C. After the primary antibody was removed, the slides were washed with PBS and incubated with reagent C (biotin-conjugated goat-anti-mouse IgG) for 30 min. Sections were rinsed with PBS and developed with reagent D (horseradish-peroxidase-labeled pronase avidin) for 15 min, then counterstained for 3–5 min with hematoxylin and coloured by 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB). Sections from human laryngeal carcinoma known to have abundant STAT3, p-STAT3 and related protein (Bcl-2, p53 and VEGF) expression served as the positive control. For the negative controls, PBS was used rather than the primary antibodies. Protein staining was quantified using computer-assisted image analysis with Image Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics) (19). MVD was assessed by the hot spot method (20).
Analysis of apoptosis by flow cytometry
Single cell suspensions were prepared from fresh tumor tissues. Cell viability was assessed by typan blue exclusion, and the samples were fixed in 70% ethanol at 4°C for 24 h. Cells were resuspended in PBS and stained with propidium iodide (50 mg/l) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, then analyzed by FCM (Epics-XLII; Beckman Coulter, USA). For DNA staining, a total of 10,000 cells were counted and analyzed by Muticycle AV software. The stained cells were analyzed by FCM. Forward light scatter characteristics were used to exclude cell debris from the analysis. Apoptotic cells were determined by their hypochromic subdiploid staining profiles.
Statistical analysis
Data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS15.0 software. One-way ANOVA was used to determine statistical differences between the experimental groups. After normalization, two-sided variance were analyzed by Pearson’s correlation coefficient. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Effects of STAT3 shRNA on mRNA expression in vivo
As shown in Fig. 1, the expression of STAT3 mRNA was significantly down-regulated 48 h after transfection in tumor cells from animals transfected with plasmid carrying STAT3 shRNA as compared to the negative controls. This confirmed the transfection efficiency of the experimental scheme applied for the in vivo transfection.
Suppression of xenograft tumor growth
After confirming the in vivo transfection efficiency, we analyzed the therapeutic potential of pshSTAT3 plus irradiation. Upon termination of the experiment, tumor volumes (mean ± SD) were 1536.83±83.27, 1030.67±89.03, 894.67±99.19 and 433.83±60.89 mm3 for the pshNeg, pshSTAT3, IR, and pshSTAT3 plus IR groups, respectively (Fig. 2A). Differences between the groups were statistically significant (F=174.07, P=0.000). The outcomes of various treatments on tumor volume and appearance are shown in Fig. 2B. There was a significant difference in tumor weight among the different groups (F=23.10, P=0.000), with the pshSTAT3 plus IR group having the lightest tumor weight (Fig. 2C). The strongest tumor growth inhibitory effect was observed in the pshSTAT3 plus IR group, which had a tumor inhibition rate of 67.7% (Fig. 2D).
Protein expression of STAT3, p-STAT3, p53, VEGF and Bcl-2
Immunostaining for STAT3 and VEGF was mainly detectable in the cytoplasmic membrane and cytoplasm. Positive expression of p-STAT3, p53 and Bcl-2 proteins was mainly found in the nuclei of the tumor cells. Strong staining for STAT3, p53, Bcl-2 and VEGF was observed in the negative control group. Most tumor cells had weak or undetectable staining for the above proteins in the pshSTAT3 plus IR group (Fig. 3A–D). Computerized image analysis revealed that the mean density of p-STAT3 decreased in a stepwise pattern in the pshNeg (115.6±14.2), IR (92.7±16.4), pshSTAT3 (89.7±1.0) and pshSTAT3 plus IR (65.2±8.9) groups (F=17.779, P<0.05). For each individual protein, including p53, Bcl-2 and VEGF, the level of protein expression among the different groups was statistically different (F=22.969, 34.285 and 13.306, all P<0.05). Compared to the other three groups, p53, Bcl-2 and VEGF protein expression was significantly reduced in the pshSAT3 plus IR group (P=0.000, 0.000 and 0.018) (Fig. 3E).
CD34 expression and MVD counting
Expression of CD34 in the pshSTAT3 plus IR group was weak or even negative, whereas it was strong in the negative control group. The newborn vascular endothelial cells were stained brown or yellow. Irregular lumens and immature vessels were often present (Fig. 4A–D). Results from MVD counting revealed that the MVD values varied widely and showed significant difference among the four groups (F=19.196, P<0.05). MVD values were 31.43±4.76 and 11.67±3.41 in the negative control group and the pshSTAT3 plus IR group, respectively (Fig. 4E).
Apoptosis assay
The results of FCM revealed statistical differences among the different treatment groups in the apoptotic rate (F=122.40, P<0.05). As shown in Fig. 5, apoptotic rates were 37.04±1.59, 24.87±3.26, 29.49±2.69 and 6.89±0.67% in the pshSTAT3 plus IR, IR, pshSTAT3 and negative control groups, respectively, with the highest rate in the pshSTAT3 plus IR group and the lowest rate in the negative control group.
Correlation analysis
Statistically significant correlations between different factors are summarized in Table I and Fig. 6. As shown, significant correlations were noted between p-STAT3 protein expression and expression of the other three downstream regulating proteins, including p-STAT3 vs. p53 (r=0.738, P=0.000), p-STAT3 vs. VEGF (r=0.735, P=0.000) and p-STAT3 vs. Bcl-2 (r=0.727, P=0.000), and also between the protein expression of p53 and VEGF and MVD counts, including p53 vs. MVD (r=0.784, P=0.000) and VEGF vs. MVD (r=0.641, P=0.000). An inverse correlation was observed between the protein expression of Bcl-2 and the cell apoptosis rate (r=−0.883, P=0.000).
Discussion
STATs are a family of proteins that act as signal messengers and transcription factors and participate in normal cellular responses to cytokines and growth factors. STAT3 is an important member of the STAT family, and is often associated with a wide variety of human malignancies, including head and neck cancer (21). STAT3 may mediate resistance to ionizing radiation or chemotherapeutic agents in certain malignant tumors, as evidenced by previous studies (22–24). For example, one study indicated that when the STAT3 gene is knocked out, B-1 cells become more susceptible to irradiation (25). It has also been reported that STAT3 inhibition with a STAT3 antisense oligonucleotide enhances radiation-induced apoptosis in prostate cancer cells (26). Furthermore, our previous study demonstrated that blocking STAT3 expression by siRNA potentiates radiation-induced cell death in Hep-2 human laryngeal carcinoma cells (17). However, it is unclear whether the inhibition of STAT3 expression by means of RNAi promotes radiosensitivity in human laryngeal carcinoma in vivo.
Essentially, RNAi specifically degrades target mRNA without affecting the stability of non-homologous mRNA. With the properties of high stability and a reliable inhibitory efficacy on the targeted mRNA, it is easier for cells to uptake siRNA than antisense oligonucleotides (27). In the present study, we successfully transfected a plasmid carrying STAT3 shRNA into xenograft human laryngeal squamous carcinoma cells using liposome as a delivery carrier. The effects of STAT3 shRNA following a planned experimental scheme on radiosensitization were investigated in the xenograft tumors. Upon termination of the experiment, tumor volume and weight in the pshSTAT3 plus radiation group were found to be dramatically reduced compared to the other groups. This indicates that a specific tumor inhibitory effect is achieved by pshSTAT3 plus radiation, superior to that achieved by radiotherapy or RNAi alone.
To explore the mechanism of radiosensitization by STAT3 shRNA in laryngeal carcinoma xenografts, the expression of STAT3 and its downstream regulating proteins as well as the associated cell apoptosis rates were evaluated. The results of protein expression from immunohistochemistry achieved by computerized image analysis demonstrated that the level of p-STAT3 decreased notably in animals treated by pshSTAT3 plus radiation, with simultaneous down-regulation of Bcl-2, p53 and VEGF protein expression. Tumor angiogenesis was also significantly suppressed, as evidenced by the MVD count. Furthermore, the results of FCM demonstrated that the apoptosis rate of tumor cells in the pshSTAT3 plus radiation group was the highest among the different groups. These changes may be attributed to the regulation of downstream signaling proteins and tumor cell apoptosis by p-STAT3, an activated form of STAT3.
It is known that numerous important signaling proteins are present downstream of the STAT3 pathway. These include cell cycle regulators (c-Myc and CyclinD1/D2), anti-apoptotic proteins (Mcl-1 and Bcl-2) and tumor suppressor factors (p53 and VEGF). These are regulated to promote cell proliferation, inhibit cell apoptosis and potentiate tumor angiogenesis, and participate in the oncogenesis and development of tumors (4,28,29). In the present study, the protein expression of p-STAT3, Bcl-2, p53 and VEGF was investigated. Correlation analysis of protein expression in the different groups demonstrated that the down-regulation of Bcl-2, p53 and VEGF by p-Stat3 is responsible for an increase in apoptosis and suppression of angiogenesis, resulting in radiosensitization effects in laryngeal carcinoma xenografts. In conclusion, STAT3 shRNA potentiate the radiosensitivity of laryngeal carcinoma xeno-grafts in vivo by regulating downstream signaling proteins in the STAT3 pathway, which exerts potent effects on the induction of apoptosis and inhibition of angiogenesis.
References
Rhee JG, Li D, O’Malley BW Jr and Suntharalingam M: Combination radiation and adenovirus-mediated P16(INK4A) gene therapy in a murine model for head and neck cancer. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 65:144–154. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rhee JG, Li D, Suntharalingam M, Guo C, O’Malley BW Jr and Carney JP: Radiosensitization of head/neck squamous cell carcinoma by adenovirus-mediated expression of the Nbs1 protein. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 67:273–278. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Takeda K, Noguchi K, Shi W, et al: Targeted disruption of the mouse Stat3 gene leads to early embryonic lethality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 94:3801–3804. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fukada T, Ohtani T, Yoshida Y, et al: STAT3 orchestrates contradictory signals in cytokine-induced G1 to S cell-cycle transition. EMBO J. 17:6670–6677. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Catlett-Falcone R, Landowski TH, Oshiro MM, et al: Constitutive activation of Stat3 signaling confers resistance to apoptosis in human U266 myeloma cells. Immunity. 10:105–115. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bromberg JF: Activation of STAT proteins and growth control. Bioessays. 23:161–169. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Niu G, Wright KL, Ma Y, et al: Role of Stat3 in regulating p53 expression and function. Mol Cell Biol. 25:7432–7440. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Odajima J, Matsumura I, Sonoyama J, et al: Full oncogenic activities of v-Src are mediated by multiple signaling pathways. Ras as an essential mediator for cell survival. J Biol Chem. 275:24096–24105. 2000.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ning ZQ, Li J, McGuinness M and Arceci RJ: STAT3 activation is required for Asp(816) mutant c-Kit induced tumorigenicity. Oncogene. 20:4528–4536. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Bowman T, Broome MA, Sinibaldi D, et al: Stat3-mediated Myc expression is required for Src transformation and PDGF-induced mitogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98:7319–7324. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sinibaldi D, Wharton W, Turkson J, Bowman T, Pledger WJ and Jove R: Induction of p21WAF1/CIP1 and cyclin D1 expression by the Src oncoprotein in mouse fibroblasts: role of activated STAT3 signaling. Oncogene. 19:5419–5427. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Karni R, Jove R and Levitzki A: Inhibition of pp60c-Src reduces Bcl-XL expression and reverses the transformed phenotype of cells overexpressing EGF and HER-2 receptors. Oncogene. 18:4654–4662. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Aoki Y, Feldman GM and Tosato G: Inhibition of STAT3 signaling induces apoptosis and decreases survivin expression in primary effusion lymphoma. Blood. 101:1535–1542. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gritsko T, Williams A, Turkson J, et al: Persistent activation of stat3 signaling induces survivin gene expression and confers resistance to apoptosis in human breast cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 12:11–19. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Epling-Burnette PK, Liu JH, Catlett-Falcone R, et al: Inhibition of STAT3 signaling leads to apoptosis of leukemic large granular lymphocytes and decreased Mcl-1 expression. J Clin Invest. 107:351–362. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wei D, Le X, Zheng L, et al: Stat3 activation regulates the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and human pancreatic cancer angiogenesis and metastasis. Oncogene. 22:319–329. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li X, Wang H, Lu X and Di B: STAT3 blockade with shRNA enhances radiosensitivity in Hep-2 human laryngeal squamous carcinoma cells. Oncol Rep. 23:345–353. 2010.PubMed/NCBI | |
Bissery MC, Guenard D, Gueritte-Voegelein F and Lavelle F: Experimental antitumor activity of taxotere (RP 56976, NSC 628503), a taxol analogue. Cancer Res. 51:4845–4852. 1991.PubMed/NCBI | |
Crisby M, Nordin-Fredriksson G, Shah PK, Yano J, Zhu J and Nilsson J: Pravastatin treatment increases collagen content and decreases lipid content, inflammation, metalloproteinases, and cell death in human carotid plaques: implications for plaque stabilization. Circulation. 103:926–933. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR and Folkman J: Tumor angio-genesis and metastasis – correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 324:1–8. 1991. | |
Turkson J and Jove R: STAT proteins: novel molecular targets for cancer drug discovery. Oncogene. 19:6613–6626. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bharti AC, Shishodia S, Reuben JM, et al: Nuclear factor-kappaB and STAT3 are constitutively active in CD138+ cells derived from multiple myeloma patients, and suppression of these transcription factors leads to apoptosis. Blood. 103:3175–3184. 2004. | |
Greten FR, Weber CK, Greten TF, et al: Stat3 and NF-kappaB activation prevents apoptosis in pancreatic carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 123:2052–2063. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Real PJ, Sierra A, De Juan A, Segovia JC, Lopez-Vega JM and Fernandez-Luna JL: Resistance to chemotherapy via Stat3-dependent overexpression of Bcl-2 in metastatic breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 21:7611–7618. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Otero DC, Poli V, David M and Rickert RC: Cutting edge: inherent and acquired resistance to radiation-induced apoptosis in B cells: a pivotal role for STAT3. J Immunol. 177:6593–6597. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Calvin DP, Nam S, Buettner R, Sekharam M, Torres-Roca J and Jove R: Inhibition of STAT3 activity with STAT3 antisense oligonucleotide (STAT3-ASO) enhances radiation induced apoptosis in DU145 prostate cancer cells. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 57:S2972003. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhang YC, Taylor MM, Samson WK and Phillips MI: Antisense inhibition: oligonucleotides, ribozymes, and siRNAs. Methods Mol Med. 106:11–34. 2005.PubMed/NCBI | |
Amin HM, McDonnell TJ, Ma Y, et al: Selective inhibition of STAT3 induces apoptosis and G(1) cell cycle arrest in ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Oncogene. 23:5426–5434. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Niu G, Wright KL, Huang M, et al: Constitutive Stat3 activity up-regulates VEGF expression and tumor angiogenesis. Oncogene. 21:2000–2008. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |