Metronomic treatment of temozolomide increases anti-angiogenicity accompanied by down-regulated O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase expression in endothelial cells
- Authors:
- Published online on: January 20, 2011 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2011.207
- Pages: 343-348
Abstract
Introduction
Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral imidazotetrazine methylating agent that undergoes spontaneous chemical conversion to 3-methyl-(triazen-1yl)-imidazole-4-carboxamide (MTIC) at physiological pH (1). A number of studies have reported that methylation of the O6-lesion of guanine through TMZ leads to various cellular responses, including cytotoxicity and anti-angiogenesis, which is due to the generation of DNA single-strand gaps and/or double-strand breaks during DNA synthesis and results from the inhibition of angiogenesis-associated genes, respectively (2–4). Since TMZ readily crosses the blood-brain barrier, it is the favorable chemotherapeutic drug for glioma patients (5). Preclinical and clinical investigations have demonstrated that the anticancer activity of TMZ depends on the administration schedule and dose (6,7). Although the anticancer activity of TMZ has been established at a maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the effect was optimized by metronomic administration at low doses and frequent schedule for the purpose of avoiding of drug resistance (8). Metronomic treatment of TMZ was found to lead to an anti-angiogenic effect accompanied by a relatively lower density of microvessels in orthotopic glioma models (9). One metronomic chemotherapy study suggested that this scheduling overcomes chemoresistance in patients with recurrent TMZ-refractory glioblastoma (GBM) without any toxicity (10). In addition, it was found that metronomic TMZ scheduling was capable of inhibiting angiogenesis in in vivo and in vitro studies using endothelial cells (11).
O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is a DNA-repair protein that plays a pivotal role in cellular resistance to alkylating agents, as MGMT removes methyl and alkyl groups at the O6-position of guanine which lead to DNA damage through covalent linking with an internal cysteine amino acid present within the MGMT protein (12). In fact, it has been well documented that MGMT activity determines the chemotherapeutic efficacy in GBM. MGMT prevents apoptosis originated from O6-methyl-guanine (O6-MeG) through TMZ treatment in glioma cells (4). In resistant glioma cells, IFN-β down-regulates MGMT expression, which results in sensitization to TMZ (13). Moreover, clinical research has reported that methylation of the MGMT promoter is useful to predict the responsiveness to alkylating agents (14). Recently, significant inhibition of glioma cell proliferation and survival was found to be dependent on the MGMT status (15). Notably, one clinical study found that significant and prolonged depletion of O6-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase (AGAT) activity was produced by metronomic chemotherapy of TMZ (16). We thus speculated that our metronomic schedule would regulate MGMT expression.
In the present study, we found that down-regulated MGMT expression resulted from metronomic treatment of TMZ in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). We also demonstrated that metronomic treatment of TMZ induced an anti-proliferative effect by down-regulating MGMT expression. Furthermore, reduced cell migration and tube formation were observed in HUVECs cultured with metronomic treatment with TMZ compared to conventional treatment with TMZ. Therefore, we suggest that metronomic chemotherapy with TMZ benefits the inhibition of angiogenic activity compared to conventional chemotherapy, and down-regulates MGMT expression, which may be associated with anti-angiogenicity in endothelial cells.
Materials and methods
Isolation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells and culture condition
HUVECs were isolated from human cords according to a previous study (17). IRB-approved cells were cultured in specific endothelial cell growth media (M199) supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, USA), 30 μg/ml endothelial cell growth supplement (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), 90 μg/ml heparin and 1% antibiotics. HUVECs were maintained at 37°C in an atmosphere with 5% CO2. HUVECs for all of the experiments were passaged four to six times.
Drug preparation and determination of the in vitro IC50 value of TMZ
TMZ was supplied from Schering-Plough (Kenilworth, NJ, USA). It was dissolved in 0.5% DMSO to produce a 20 mg/ml stock solution. To determine the in vitro IC50 value of TMZ for HUVECs, the cells were treated with 50, 100, 200, 400 and 800 μM of TMZ. The IC50 value (372.2 μM) was calculated using the following formula: (X2–X1) × (50-Y1)/(Y1+Y2) + X1; where X1 and X2 indicate the high and low dose, respectively. ‘50’ indicates a global cell growth of 50%, and both Y1 and Y2 indicate the mean percentage of X1 and X2, respectively (27).
HUVEC proliferation assay
HUVEC proliferation assay was performed using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan), which is a sensitive non-radioactive colorimetric assay kit. HUVECs were seeded at 1×103 cells in 96-well plates and incubated at 37°C, overnight. After 1 day, HUVECs were treated with 37.5, 75, 150 and 300 μM of TMZ conventionally and 6.25, 12.5, 25 and 50 μM of TMZ metronomically, which was carried out using one-time and six-time treatments, respectively. After TMZ treatment, the cells were cultured continuously for 144 h. The optical density was measured at 450 nm using an ELISA reader (Molecular Devices, San Francisco, CA, USA). Another proliferation assay was performed using HUVECs which were cultured with non-treatment, conventional treatment of TMZ and metronomic treatment of TMZ for 144 h. The cells were cultured by the method mentioned above. Briefly, the cells were harvested at 144 h and then cultured in 96-well plates for 1 day at 37°C (5% CO2, humidity). The cells were treated with 100 μM of TMZ. The anti-proliferative effect was determined in the HUVECs after an additional culture for 72 h.
Migration assay
A migration assay was performed using a modified Boyden chamber (Neuro Probe, Inc., Cabin John, MD, USA) according to the manufacturer's recommendation. The underside of the polycarbonate membrane (8 μm) was coated with 0.1% gelatin overnight at room temperature (RT). The membrane was placed over the lower chambers containing 0.1% BSA, 90 μg/ml heparin supplemented with 2 ng/ml VEGF (VEGF165; R&D Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany) in EBM2, and the upper chamber was then assembled. After assembling, HUVECs treated with TMZ by a conventional or metronomic schedule were incubated in free EBM2 for 4 h. The cells (2×104) were transferred to the upper chamber and cultured for 5 h at 37°C with 5% CO2 to induce cell migration. Fixation and staining with Diff-Quick solution (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) were performed. Measurement of the migrated cells was also performed by manual counting after photography.
Tube formation assay
Unpolymerized Matrigel (150 μl; BD Bioscience) was placed in pre-chilled 48-well plates and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. HUVECs (3×104) treated with TMZ by the conventional or metronomic schedule were transferred onto the solidified Matrigel. After incubation for 18 h at 37°C in 5% CO2, tube formation was observed, and images of five representative fields were captured. Tube lengths were determined using Image J (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/).
Western blot analysis
Protein was extracted from the HUVECs treated with the conventional or metronomic TMZ schedule. Electrophoresis was performed on 10% polyacrylamide gels, and the proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Pall Co., Pensacola, FL, USA) for 90 min at 4°C. The membrane was blocked with blocking solution (5% skim milk; BD Bioscience), 0.1% Tween-20, 1X TBS for 1 h at RT. The membrane was incubated with anti-MGMT (1:2,000, mouse; Chemicon International Inc.) and anti-β-actin (1:10,000, mouse; Sigma-Aldrich) antibodies overnight at 4°C. The membrane was washed three times and then incubated with a secondary antibody (1:10,000, goat anti-mouse IgG-conjugated HRP; Cell Signaling, USA) for 2 h at RT. Blots were developed by enzyme-linked chemiluminescence (ECL detection kit; Amersham Biosciences).
Results
Metronomic treatment of TMZ improved anti-angiogenic efficacy in HUVECs
A distinction between conventional and metronomic chemotherapeutic efficacy of TMZ against angiogenicity was assessed by proliferation, cell migration and angiogenic tube formation in HUVECs. First, we evaluated the proliferative effect between conventional and metronomic treatment of TMZ using CCK-8 (Dojindo Laboratory). Prior to the evaluation of the proliferative effect, we determined the in vitro IC50 value of HUVECs for growth inhibition. HUVECs were cultured for 120 h after treatment with 0–800 μM TMZ, and the IC50 value was determined to be 372.2 μM. As shown in Fig. 1B, metronomic treatment of TMZ significantly inhibited cell proliferation. The cell numbers of HUVECs metronomically treatment with 12.5 and 25 μM TMZ after 144 h were ∼6.4- and 2.4-fold less than those treated with the conventional TMZ treatment, respectively. Intriguingly, the anti-proliferative effects of a metronomic treatment of 6.25 μM TMZ and a conventional treatment of 300 μM TMZ were almost identical. Therefore, HUVEC proliferation was markedly decreased by the metronomic treatment of TMZ compared to the conventional treatment of TMZ, suggesting that the side effects of conventional chemotherapy of TMZ may be avoided.
To measure the anti-angiogenic activity of the metronomic treatment of TMZ, cell migration assay was performed using a Boyden chamber with slight modification. The results showed that the numbers of cells which migrated towards the VEGF-coated bottom were significantly reduced, ∼41 and 67% at 12.5 and 25 μM TMZ, respectively, compared to the HUVECs which were treated with the conventional TMZ schedule (Fig. 2).
An additional anti-angiogenic activity was assessed through a tube formation assay using a Matrigel basement membrane matrix (BD Bioscience). HUVECs treated with the metronomic and conventional TMZ protocols for 144 h were then cultured on a Matrigel matrix to induce alignment and formation of hollow tube-like structures. Upon metronomic treatment with 25 μM TMZ, tube formation of HUVECs was markedly inhibited compared with the tubal formation of HUVECS exposed to the conventional treatment with 150 μM TMZ, indicating that conventional treatment of TMZ does not inhibit tube formation of tumor-associated endothelial cells (Fig. 3). Taken together, metronomic chemotherapy of TMZ is beneficial for anti-angiogenicity by inhibiting cell proliferation, cell migration in VEGF and angiogenic tube formation.
Metronomic treatment with TMZ inhibits MGMT expression in HUVECs
Tolcher et al reported that AGAT activity is decreased by prolonged administration of TMZ in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) (16). Since the action of therapeutic methylating agents, including TMZ, dacarbazine, streptozotocin and procarbazine, against MGMT activity has been investigated in various cell types and disease models (18–20), we speculated that MGMT may be involved in the proliferation of HUVECs. We therefore examined the expression level of MGMT through both conventional and metronomic treatment of TMZ using immunoblot analysis using cells harvested at 144 h. The results showed that the expression level of MGMT was significantly reduced by metronomic treatment with TMZ, particularly at 25 μM TMZ, although MGMT expression upon conventional treatment of TMZ was nearly similar (Fig. 4A). Furthermore, we assessed an additional metronomic therapeutic efficacy of TMZ in HUVEC proliferation which may be related to MGMT expression level. As a result of treatment with 100 μM TMZ, HUVECs that were treated with a metronomic TMZ schedule were consistently inhibited in cellular growth compared to HUVECs that were cultured with the conventional TMZ schedule (Fig. 4B). Thus, we identified that metronomic treatment of TMZ deregulates MGMT expression in HUVECs, and MGMT inactivity may lead to a decrease in proliferation of endothelial cells.
Discussion
Conventional chemotherapy of anticancer drugs has anti-tumor efficacy accompanied by anti-angiogenicity (8). Despite that conventional chemotherapy promises a successive and curative effect, it also gives rise to side effects, such as cytotoxicity and tolerance resulting in disease recurrence. By contrast, metronomic treatment has become a suitable chemotherapeutic method which includes the advantages of both the possibility of combination treatment and the prevention of drug resistance. As metronomic chemotherapy was shown to exhibit anti-angiogenic potential, including apoptosis or inhibition of proliferation in endothelial cells, our aim focused on the mechanism of metronomic TMZ chemotherapeutic efficacy by investigating anti-angiogenicity and evaluating the MGMT expression level.
Inhibition of tumor angiogenesis has become a popular anti-tumor target through the use of chemotherapeutic drugs, such as TMZ, methotrexate (21), paclitaxel (22), vinblastine (23), bevacizumab (24) and doxorubicin (25), either directly or indirectly by the inhibition of cell proliferation, migration and blood vessel formation. Studies on the metronomic chemotherapy of anti-angiogenic drugs have shown that paclitaxel inhibits the proliferation of HUVECs at low doses, although doxorubicin inhibits angiogenesis at low doses without inhibition of cell migration and tube formation (22,26). Since each drug has different therapeutic effects on endothelial cells for tumor angiogenesis, metronomic treatment used in combination with other drugs is possible to improve the therapeutic effect. Regarding combination treatment, an anti-tumor effect was found to be markedly increased by a combination of both TMZ and bevacizumab in a human GBM orthotopic xenograft model (27), indicating that metronomic treatment of TMZ may have the advantage of a synergistic improvement in the therapeutic effect by co-administration with other treatments.
We assumed that the metronomic chemotherapeutic effect appears to be dependent on the IC50 value according to the following. Kurzen et al reported the IC50 of TMZ to be approximately 250 μM; inhibition of HUVEC proliferation occurs at a minimum dose of 25 μM of TMZ, and low doses in a range of 2.5–10 μM do not significantly inhibit HUVEC proliferation (11). By contrast, Lam et al (28) reported that a significant anti-proliferative effect in HUVECs was observed upon treatment of 2.5 μM TMZ treatment with an IC50 value of 6.6 μM. In the present study, we determined the in vitro IC50 value to be 372.2 μM and observed an anti-proliferative effect upon metronomic treatment with TMZ, which markedly inhibited HUVEC proliferation compared to conventional treatment of TMZ. In addition, since our metronomic treatment of TMZ was performed consecutively every 12 h, not daily, the IC50 value for growth inhibition of HUVECs in the present study differed from other reports. Thus, the discrepancy regarding the in vitro IC50 value and beneficial dose may be due to the experimental condition, including cell batch number, culture medium and treatment method. Our previous study found an anti-proliferative effect in HUVECs similar to the present study, in which no inhibitory effect was detected in either conventional TMZ single treatment or the combination of TMZ and IFN-β on HUVEC proliferation, although inhibition of proliferation was noted in GBM cells (29). This result also suggests that metronomic treatment with TMZ exerts an improved anti-proliferative effect on HUVEC proliferation. Therefore, as mentioned above, metronomic treatment with TMZ is a more beneficial therapy to inhibit proliferation of endothelial cells by tumor angiogenesis.
In this study, MGMT expression was down-regulated by metronomic treatment of TMZ in HUVECs, but not by conventional treatment of TMZ. MGMT has been the focus of research concerning drug resistance since the molecule was found to be highly expressed in several types of tumors, including colon cancer, breast cancer, myeloma, pancreatic tumor and gliomas (30,31). Regarding resistance to TMZ, Natsume et al reported that down-regulated MGMT expression by IFN-β results in the sensitization of resistant glioma cells to TMZ (13). Moreover, it has been reported that methylation of the MGMT promoter in gliomas is associated with responsiveness to alkylating reagents (14). One clinical research study found that long-term administration of TMZ leads to significant and prolonged depletion of AGAT activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, which may enhance the anti-tumor activity of methylating agents (16). In accordance with the reports mentioned above, we observed a reduced expression level of MGMT in HUVECs upon metronomic treatment of TMZ. Intriguingly, we also observed that the MGMT expression level was still down-regulated in several passages of HUVECs, indicating that metronomic TMZ chemotherapy sensitizes HUVECs by down-regulating MGMT expression (data not shown).
In relation to other anti-angiogenic activities, our study also showed that migration and tube formation were generally decreased in HUVECs cultured with metronomic treatment of TMZ. This result indicates that the decreased MGMT expression level upon administration of consecutive low doses of TMZ improves anti-angiogenicity in endothelial cells (Figs. 3 and 4). Helmlinger et al proposed that autocrine endothelial VEGF contributes to the formation of blood vessels. Overexpression of dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase 2 was found to increase VEGF mRNA expression and enhance tube formation (32). A recent study demonstrated that MGMT modulates GBM angiogenesis, and identified angiogenesis related-genes, including VEGF and its receptors in MGMT-positive GBM cells, demonstrating that VEGF receptors are differentially expressed according to MGMT status (15). Based on these findings, we hypothesized that reduced migration and tube formation in HUVECs may result from metronomic treatment of TMZ which leads to a decreased MGMT expression level, but also that metronomic treatment of TMZ may alter and reconstruct endogenous expression and secretion of VEGF and its receptors in HUVECs.
In conclusion, this is the first in vitro study to report that the MGMT expression level can be modulated by metronomic treatment of TMZ; accordingly, it resulted in the decrease in proliferation, cell migration and tube formation in endothelial cells. In the present study, we also observed that MGMT inactivity is necessary to maximize the beneficial effect of methylating agents. Clinical trials on metronomic chemotherapy suggest various conditions and evidence; however, the adequate dose of TMZ chemotherapy for patients with tumors must be determined to allow individualized drug effectiveness. Thus, a consecutive treatment and a much lower dose of TMZ may allow its use in combination with other drugs in order to increase the chemotherapeutic efficacy and reduce side effects in clinical trials.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a grant from the National R&D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Korea (0720330).
References
Payne MJ, Pratap SE and Middleton MR: Temozolomide in the treatment of solid tumours: current results and rationale for dosing/scheduling. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 53:241–252. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gerson SL: MGMT: its role in cancer aetiology and cancer therapeutics. Nat Rev. 4:296–307. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
O'Brien V and Brown R: Signalling cell cycle arrest and cell death through the MMR System. Carcinogenesis. 27:682–692. 2006.PubMed/NCBI | |
Roos WP, Batista LF, Naumann SC, et al: Apoptosis in malignant glioma cells triggered by the temozolomide-induced DNA lesion O6-methylguanine. Oncogene. 26:186–197. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Newlands ES, Stevens MF, Wedge SR, Wheelhouse RT and Brock C: Temozolomide: a review of its discovery, chemical properties, pre-clinical development and clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rev. 23:35–61. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Antonadou D, Paraskevaidis M, Sarris G, et al: Phase II randomized trial of temozolomide and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases. J Clin Oncol. 20:3644–3650. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chua SL, Rosenthal MA, Wong SS, et al: Phase 2 study of temozolomide and Caelyx in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. Neuro Oncology. 6:38–43. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kerbel RS and Kamen BA: The anti-angiogenic basis of metronomic chemotherapy. Nat Rev. 4:423–436. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim JT, Kim JS, Ko KW, et al: Metronomic treatment of temozolomide inhibits tumor cell growth through reduction of angiogenesis and augmentation of apoptosis in orthotopic models of gliomas. Oncol Rep. 16:33–39. 2006.PubMed/NCBI | |
Kong DS, Lee JI, Kim WS, et al: A pilot study of metronomic temozolomide treatment in patients with recurrent temozolomide-refractory glioblastoma. Oncol Rep. 16:1117–1121. 2006.PubMed/NCBI | |
Kurzen H, Schmitt S, Naher H and Mohler T: Inhibition of angiogenesis by non-toxic doses of temozolomide. Anticancer Drugs. 14:515–522. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fukushima T, Takeshima H and Kataoka H: Anti-glioma therapy with temozolomide and status of the DNA-repair gene MGMT. Anticancer Res. 29:4845–4854. 2009.PubMed/NCBI | |
Natsume A, Ishii D, Wakabayashi T, et al: IFN-beta down-regulates the expression of DNA repair gene MGMT and sensitizes resistant glioma cells to temozolomide. Cancer Res. 65:7573–7579. 2005.PubMed/NCBI | |
Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T, et al: MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Eng J Med. 352:997–1003. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chahal M, Xu Y, Lesniak D, et al: MGMT modulates glioblastoma angiogenesis and response to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib. Neuro Oncology. 12:822–833. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tolcher AW, Gerson SL, Denis L, et al: Marked inactivation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity with protracted temozolomide schedules. Br J Cancer. 88:1004–1011. 2003. | |
Curran WJ Jr, Scott CB, Horton J, et al: Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group malignant glioma trials. J Nat Cancer Inst. 85:704–710. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Boiardi A, Silvani A, Ciusani E, et al: Fotemustine combined with procarbazine in recurrent malignant gliomas: a phase I study with evaluation of lymphocyte 06-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity. J Neurooncol. 52:149–156. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pieper RO, Futscher BW, Dong Q and Erickson LC: Effects of streptozotocin/bis-chloroethylnitrosourea combination therapy on O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase activity and mRNA levels in HT-29 cells in vitro. Cancer Res. 51:1581–1585. 1991.PubMed/NCBI | |
Sanada M, Hidaka M, Takagi Y, et al: Modes of actions of two types of anti-neoplastic drugs, dacarbazine and ACNU, to induce apoptosis. Carcinogenesis. 28:2657–2663. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hirata S, Matsubara T, Saura R, Tateishi H and Hirohata K: Inhibition of in vitro vascular endothelial cell proliferation and in vivo neovascularization by low-dose methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum. 32:1065–1073. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Belotti D, Vergani V, Drudis T, et al: The microtubule-affecting drug paclitaxel has antiangiogenic activity. Clin Cancer Res. 2:1843–1849. 1996.PubMed/NCBI | |
Vacca A, Iurlaro M, Ribatti D, et al: Antiangiogenesis is produced by nontoxic doses of vinblastine. Blood. 94:4143–4155. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
Fujita K, Sano D, Kimura M, et al: Anti-tumor effects of bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 18:47–51. 2007.PubMed/NCBI | |
Lau DH, Duran GE, Lewis AD and Sikic BI: Metabolic conversion of methoxymorpholinyl doxorubicin: from a DNA strand breaker to a DNA cross-linker. Br J Cancer. 70:79–84. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bijman MN, van Nieuw Amerongen GP, Laurens N, van Hinsbergh VW and Boven E: Microtubule-targeting agents inhibit angiogenesis at subtoxic concentrations, a process associated with inhibition of Rac1 and Cdc42 activity and changes in the endothelial cytoskeleton. Mol Cancer Ther. 5:2348–2357. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Mathieu V, De Neve N, Le Mercier M, et al: Combining bevacizumab with temozolomide increases the antitumor efficacy of temozolomide in a human glioblastoma orthotopic xenograft model. Neoplasia. 10:1383–1392. 2008.PubMed/NCBI | |
Lam T, Hetherington JW, Greenman J, Little S and Maraveyas A: Metronomic chemotherapy dosing-schedules with estramustine and temozolomide act synergistically with anti-VEGFR-2 antibody to cause inhibition of human umbical venous endothelial cell growth. Acta Oncol. 46:1169–1177. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Park JA, Joe YA, Kim TG and Hong YK: Potentiation of anti-glioma effect with combined temozolomide and interferon-beta. Oncol Rep. 16:1253–1260. 2006.PubMed/NCBI | |
Citron M, Decker R, Chen S, et al: O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in human normal and tumor tissue from brain, lung, and ovary. Cancer Res. 51:4131–4134. 1991. | |
Povey AC, Hall CN, Cooper DP, O'Connor PJ and Margison GP: Determinants of O(6)-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity in normal and tumour tissue from human colon and rectum. Int J Cancer. 85:68–72. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Helmlinger G, Endo M, Ferrara N, Hlatky L and Jain RK: Formation of endothelial cell networks. Nature. 405:139–141. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar |