Intratumoral Wnt2B expression affects tumor proliferation and survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma patients
- Authors:
- Published online on: March 12, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2012.511
- Pages: 952-958
Abstract
Introduction
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a thoracic tumor that arises from surface serosal cells of the pleura. It has been reported to be associated with inhalation exposure to asbestos (1). MPM is characterized by rapidly progressive and diffusely local growth, and a poor prognosis. Unfortunately, the incidence of MPM has been predicted to steadily increase and peak over the next two decades (2). However, there is no known curative modality for MPM (3), and long term survival is rare even with aggressive multimodal therapy including extrapleural pneumonectomy (4). Therefore, a new treatment strategy is required for MPM patients.
Among various molecules, the Wnt gene family encodes multi-functional signaling glycoproteins that are involved in the regulation of a wide variety of normal and pathological processes, including embryogenesis and tumorigenesis (5,6). Recently, we found that three members of the Wnt family, including Wnt1, Wnt2B and Wnt5A, are associated with tumorigenesis (7). In fact, many clinical studies have reported that overexpression of Wnt members is associated with various tumorigenic processes, such as proliferation, angiogenesis and patient survival (8–11). However, there are only a few clinical studies on the molecular biology of human MPM (12).
Therefore, to clarify the tumor biology of MPM, we performed a comprehensive clinical study on the intratumoral expression of Wnt1, Wnt2B and Wnt5A, in relation to the tumor-associated Wnt targets, survivin (13,14) and c-Myc (15).
Materials and methods
Clinical characteristics of patients
One hundred and seven consecutive MPM patients who were diagnosed at Kyoto University Hospital, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki Hospital, or Hyogo Prefectural Tsukaguchi Hospital, from January 1998 to December 2010 were studied. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kyoto University, and informed consent was obtained from each patient. All tumors were clinically staged according to the IMIG staging system (16), and histological classification was based on the WHO classification (17). The clinical records and histopathological diagnosis of all patients were fully documented. This report includes the follow-up data up to December 28, 2010.
Immunohistochemistry
The following antibodies were used: a rabbit polyclonal antibody for Wnt1 (H89; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA) diluted at 1:200, a rabbit polyclonal antibody for Wnt2B (LS-C31588; LifeSpan Biosciences, Seattle, WA, USA) diluted at 1.5 μg/ml, a goat polyclonal antibody for Wnt5B (C-16) diluted at 1:100, a mouse monoclonal antibody for survivin (sc17779) diluted at 1:50, a mouse monoclonal antibody for c-Myc (9E10) (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) diluted at 1:100, and a mouse monoclonal antibody for the Ki-67 antigen (MIB-1; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) diluted at 1:40. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue was cut into 4-μm sections and mounted on poly-lysine-coated slides. After deparaffinization and rehydration, the slides were heated in a microwave for 10 min in 10 μmol/l citrate buffer solution at pH 6.0. After quenching the endogenous peroxidase activity with 0.3% H2O2 (in absolute methanol) for 30 min, the sections were treated with 5% bovine serum albumin. Duplicate sections were incubated overnight with the primary antibodies, respectively. Slides were then incubated for 1 h with biotinylated secondary antibodies (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). The sections were incubated with the avidin-biotinperoxidase complex (Vector) for 1 h, and antibody binding was visualized with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride. Lastly, the sections were lightly counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin.
The immunostained sections were examined by two authors (M.K. and C.H.) without knowledge of the patient characteristics. Cases with discrepancies were jointly reevaluated until a consensus was reached. At least 200 cells were scored per ×40 field about tumour cells. The percentage of carcinoma cells with positive staining for Ki-67 in a given specimen was scored as the Ki-67 proliferation index (9).
Detection of apoptosis
The TUNEL method was performed using the In Situ Apoptosis Detection kit (Takara Biomedicals, Otsu, Japan). After deparaffinization and rehydration, the sections were treated with 20 μg/ml proteinase K for 15 min. After quenching the endogenous peroxidase activity with 3% H2O2 for 5 min, the sections were incubated for 90 min at 37°C with the TUNEL reaction mixture, including terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT). Next, the sections were incubated for 30 min at 37°C with anti-FITC horseradish peroxidase conjugate. Staining was detected by 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride incubation for 15 min. Lastly, the sections were lightly counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin. In each case, a total of 10,000 tumor cells were evaluated by two authors (M.K. and C.H.) independently, without knowledge of the patient characteristics. The apoptotic index was defined as the number of apoptotic cells per 1,000 tumor cells (18).
Statistical analysis
The statistical significance of Wnt1, Wnt2B, Wnt5A, survivin, and c-Myc expression was assessed by t-test, ANOVA with Bonferroni/Dunn test or Pearson’s correlation coefficient. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the probability of overall survival as a function of time, and differences in the survival of subgroups of patients were compared by using Mantel’s log-rank test. A multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox regression model to study the effects of different variables on survival. The sample was classified as a Wnt1-high tumor when the percentage of Wnt1-positive tumor cells was >50%, and as a Wnt5A-high tumor when the percentage of Wnt5A-positive tumor cells was >30%, as reported previously (8,9). The sample was classified as a Wnt2B-high tumor when the percentage of Wnt2B-positive tumor cells was >50%, a nuclear survivin-high tumor when the percentage of nuclear survivin-positive tumor cells was >20%, and a c-Myc-high tumor when the percentage of c-Myc-positive tumor cells was >30%, as this had the highest significance value in relation to the Ki-67 proliferation index. The sample was classified as a Ki-67-high tumor when the Ki-67 proliferation index was >30% as this had the highest significance value in relation to patient survival. All p-values were based on two-tailed statistical analysis, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.
Results
Wnt1 expression in MPMs
The Wnt1 expression appeared in a cytoplasmic staining pattern (Fig. 1A). The percentage of Wnt1-positive tumor cells varied greatly among the MPM cases (median, 15.0%; mean ± SD, 25.9±26.4%) (Fig. 2). Regarding clinical and pathological characteristics, the percentage of Wnt1-positive tumors was significantly higher in stage I patients (p=0.0107) (Table I). However, no significant difference was observed in the Wnt1 status according to tumor histology.
 | Table I.Expression of Wnt family members in 107 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma according to clinicopathological characteristics. |
Wnt2B expression in MPMs
The Wnt2B expression was also detected in a cytoplasmic staining pattern (Fig. 1B). The percentage of Wnt2B-positive tumor cells also varied greatly among the MPM cases (median, 60.0%; mean ± SD, 54.1±31.7%) (Fig. 2). No significant difference was observed in the Wnt2B status according to pathological stage and tumor histology (Table I).
Wnt5A expression in MPMs
The Wnt5A expression appeared in a cytoplasmic staining pattern (Fig. 1H). The percentage of Wnt5A-positive tumor cells varied greatly among the MPM cases (median, 30.0%; mean ± SD, 32.1±27.9%) (Fig. 2). The percentage of Wnt5A-positive tumors was significantly higher in stage I patients (p=0.0466) (Table I). However, no significant difference was observed in the Wnt5A status according to tumor histology (Table I).
Predominant expression of different Wnt proteins in MPMs
Among the 107 MPMs, 23 MPMs (21.5%) were Wnt1-high tumors, 72 MPMs (67.3%) were Wnt2B-high tumors, and 54 MPMs (50.5%) were Wnt5A-high tumors. There was no correlation between the expression levels of the different Wnt proteins. Furthermore, the percentage of Wnt2B-positive tumors was significantly higher than that of the other Wnt members (p<0.0001 vs. Wnt1 and p<0.0001 vs. Wnt5A) (Fig. 2).
Survivin expression in MPMs
Immunostaining of the antibody against survivin showed various patterns of nuclear staining and cytoplasmic staining (Fig. 1C). The percentage of nuclear survivin staining was significantly higher than that of cytoplasmic survivin staining (27.2±30.2 vs. 15.6±25.6%, p=0.0025).
Regarding tumor biology, the Ki-67 proliferation index was significantly higher in nuclear survivin-high tumors than in nuclear survivin-low tumors (60.6±33.8 vs. 37.8±27.8%, p=0.0002) (Fig. 3A). In contrast, there was no difference in the apoptotic index according to the cytoplasmic survivin expression in MPMs (7.0±3.7 in cytoplasmic survivin-high tumors and 5.7±2.3 in cytoplasmic survivin-low tumors).
Regarding the Wnt status, the percentage of survivin-positive tumor cells significantly correlated with the percentage of Wnt2B-positive tumor cells (r=0.335, p<0.001). However, the percentage of survivin-positive tumor cells did not correlated with the percentage of Wnt1-positive tumor cells (p=0.1101) or the percentage of Wnt5A-positive tumor cells (p=0.4631).
c-Myc expression in MPMs
The percentage of c-Myc-positive tumor cells varied greatly among the MPM cases (median, 35.0%; mean ± SD, 37.3±30.3%) (Fig. 1D). Regarding tumor proliferation, the Ki-67 proliferation index was significantly higher in c-Myc-high tumors than in c-Myc-low tumors (53.8±31.4 vs. 39.7±31.7%; p=0.0231) (Fig. 3B). In contrast, there was no difference in the apoptotic index in relation to the c-Myc status in MPMs (5.2±2.5 in c-Myc-high tumors and 7.1±3.0 in c-Myc-low tumors).
In regards to the Wnt status, the percentage of c-Myc-positive tumor cells significantly correlated with the percentage of Wnt2B-positive tumor cells (r=0.364, p<0.001). However, the percentage of c-Myc-positive tumor cells did not correlated with the percentage of Wnt1-positive tumor cells (p=0.3937) or the percentage of Wnt5A-positive tumor cells (p=0.3498).
Tumor biology and intratumoral Wnt1 status in MPMs
There was no difference in the Ki-67 proliferation index in relation to the Wnt1 status in MPMs (35.4±28.2% in Wnt1-high tumors and 50.1±32.7% in Wnt1-low tumors) (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, there was no difference in the apoptotic index in relation to the Wnt1 status in MPMs (11.2±6.0 in Wnt1-high tumors and 4.7±1.8 in Wnt1-low tumors).
Tumor biology and intratumoral Wnt2B status in MPMs
Regarding tumor proliferation, the Ki-67 proliferation index was 51.3±31.4% in Wnt2B-high tumors, and 37.9±32.4% in Wnt2B-low tumors (Fig. 3D). The Ki-67 proliferation index was significantly higher in Wnt2B-high tumors than in Wnt2B-low tumors (p=0.0438). In contrast, there was no difference in the apoptotic index in relation to the Wnt2B status in MPMs (7.7±2.8 in Wnt2B-high tumors and 2.9±1.3 in Wnt2B-low tumors).
Tumor biology and intratumoral Wnt5A status in MPMs
There was no difference in the Ki-67 proliferation index in relation to the Wnt5A status in MPMs (48.0±31.1% in Wnt5A-high tumors and 45.9±33.6% in Wnt5A-low tumors) (Fig. 3E). In addition, there was no difference in the apoptotic index in relation to the Wnt 5A status in MPMs (5.6±2.6 in Wnt5A-high tumors and 6.6±2.9 in Wnt5A-low tumors).
Survival of MPM patients in relation to the Ki-67 proliferation index and intratumoral Wnt status
Regarding tumor proliferation, the 5-year survival rate was significantly lower in patients with high Ki-67 tumors than in those with low Ki-67 tumors (7.8 vs. 30.4%, p<0.0001) (Fig. 4A). Regarding the intratumoral Wnt status, the 5-year survival rate was 11.6% in patients with Wnt2B-high tumors, and 32.3% in patients with Wnt2B-low tumors (Fig. 4C). The overall survival was significantly lower in patients with Wnt2B-high tumors than in those with Wnt2B-low tumors (p=0.0238). In particular, the overall survival was significantly lower in patients with Wnt2B-high epithelioid tumors than in those with Wnt2B-low epithelioid tumors (20.9 vs. 37.4% at 5-year survival, p=0.0426) (Fig. 4D). In contrast, there was no difference in patient survival according to Wnt1 status or Wnt5A status (Fig. 4B and E). A Cox multivariate analysis demonstrated that Wnt2B status (hazard ratio 2.396; p=0.0042), pathological stage (hazard ratio 1.455; p=0.0439), and tumor histology (hazard ratio 1.973; p=0.0074) were significant prognostic factors for MPM patients (Table II).
| Table II.Multivariate regression analysis for predicting survival of 107 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. |
Discussion
The clinical outcome of MPM patients is poor even in patients with early-stage MPM (3). In fact, 69.2% (74 of 107) of MPM patients included in the present study had advanced-stage MPM, and the 5-year survival rate was only 22.2% even in stage I patients. The development of new treatment strategies for MPM patients is therefore critical.
The Wnt family is involved in the regulation of a wide variety of normal and pathological processes including tumorigenesis (5,6). We first investigated the expression of Wnt1, Wnt2B, and Wnt5A in tumor tissues from MPM patients. The present study showed that the intratumoral expression of Wnt2B was significantly higher than that of Wnt1 and Wnt5A in MPMs. In addition, Wnt1 and Wnt5A expression levels were significantly lower in MPMs than in non-small cell lung cancers that were analyzed concurrently (data not shown). These results suggest that the intratumoral Wnt2B expression has an effect on the tumor biology of MPMs.
Wnt2B is known to stimulate the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway (19). The activation of the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway leads to the transcription of Wnt-target genes including survivin (13,14), c-Myc (15), and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (20). Therefore, Wnt2B overexpression may affect tumor biology during tumor progression through the induction of these tumor-associated Wnt targets.
Furthermore, the present study clearly demonstrated that the tumor proliferation rate was associated with survival of MPM patients. In fact, MPM is clinically characterized by rapid and diffuse local growth, which results in a poor prognosis. In contrast, the apoptotic index in MPM tissues was significantly lower than that in non-small cell lung cancers that were analyzed concurrently (data not shown). We, therefore, evaluated the expression of survivin (13,14) and c-Myc (15), Wnt-targets associated with proliferation.
Previous studies have shown that survivin not only inhibits the caspase-dependent apoptotic pathway (21,22), but also accelerates cell proliferation (23). In particular, the nuclear localization of survivin affects cell mitosis through chromosome condensation and segregation (24,25). Previous studies revealed that the nuclear expression of survivin is associated with tumor proliferation and a poor prognosis in cancer patients (26–28). The present study also demonstrated that the nuclear expression of survivin was associated with tumor proliferation in MPMs. Furthermore, the survival was significantly lower in patients with nuclear survivin-high tumors than in those with nuclear survivin-low tumors (p=0.0447) (data not shown).
c-Myc is also a target of the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway (15). c-Myc is involved in cell cycle progression through the stimulation and repression of the expression of cell cycle regulators (29). Previous studies have revealed that c-Myc overexpression is associated with the malignant phenotype in various human cancers (8,30). The present clinical study also demonstrated that c-Myc expression was associated with the tumor proliferation of MPMs.
Finally, we investigated the clinical significance of Wnt expression in relation to survivin and c-Myc expression. Consequently, the present study has revealed that the intratumoral Wnt2B expression is associated with survivin and c-Myc expression, which results in the acceleration of tumor proliferation. Furthermore, overall survival was lower in patients with Wnt2B-high tumors than in those with Wnt2B-low tumors. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive clinical study clearly demonstrating the clinical significance of intratumoral Wnt2B expression in MPMs. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that intratumoral Wnt2B expression is associated with tumor proliferation and survival of MPM patients through the induction of survivin and c-Myc. Wnt2B is therefore a potential candidate for molecular-targeted therapy for MPMs. In fact, it was recently demonstrated that an adenoviral vector expressing short hairpin RNA (shRNA) against Wnt2B had a strong antitumor effect against Wnt2B-overexpressing tumors, via the down-regulation of survivin and c-Myc, resulting in the inhibition of tumor proliferation and the induction of apoptosis (31). Therefore, Wnt2B-inhibiting gene therapy, including the intrathoracic administration of viral vectors (32) or non-viral vectors (33), may be effective as a therapeutic strategy for Wnt2B-overexpressing MPMs (34).
Acknowledgements
We thank Ms. Seiko Sakai for the excellent secretarial assistance.
References
|
Greillier L and Astoul P: Mesothelioma and asbestos-related pleural diseases. Respiration. 76:1–15. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Bueno R: Mesothelioma clinical presentation. Chest. 116(Suppl 6): S444–S445. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Fujimoto N, Aoe K, Gamba K, Kato K, Yamazaki K and Kishimoto T: Clinical investigation of malignant mesothelioma in Japan. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 136:1755–1759. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Schil PE, Bass P, Gaafar R, et al: Trimodality therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma: results from an EORTC phase II multicentre trial. Eur Respir J. 36:1362–1369. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Dale TC: Signal transduction by the Wnt family of ligands. Biochem J. 329:209–223. 1998. | |
|
You Z, Saims D, Chen S, et al: Wnt signaling promotes oncogenic transformation by inhibiting c-Myc-induced apoptosis. J Cell Biol. 157:429–440. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Huang C, Liu D, Masuya D, et al: MRP-1/CD9 gene transduction downregulates Wnt signal pathways. Oncogene. 23:7475–7483. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Huang C, Liu D, Ishikawa S, et al: Wnt1 overexpression promotes tumour progression in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer. 44:2680–2688. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Huang C, Liu D, Nakano J, et al: Wnt5a expression is associated with the tumor proliferation and the stromal vascular endothelial growth factor-A expression in non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 23:8765–8773. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Chen G, Shukeir N, Potti A, et al: Up-regulation of Wnt-1 and β-catenin production in patients with advanced metastatic prostate carcinoma: potential pathogenetic and prognostic implications. Cancer. 101:1345–1356. 2004. | |
|
Zhang WM, Lo Muzio L, Rubini C and Yan G: Effect of WNT-1 on β-catenin expression and its relation to Ki-67 and tumor differentiation in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 13:1095–1099. 2005. | |
|
Lee A, Raz DJ, He B and Jablons DM: Update on the molecular biology of malignant mesothelioma. Cancer. 109:1454–1461. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kim PJ, Plescia J, Clevers H, Fearon ER and Altieri DC: Survivin and molecular pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. Lancet. 362:205–209. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ma H, Nguyen C, Lee KS and Kahn M: Differential roles for the coactivators CBP and p300 on TCF/β-catenin-mediated survivin gene expression. Oncogene. 24:3619–3631. 2005.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
He TC, Sparks AB, Rago C, et al: Identification of c-MYC as a target of the APC pathway. Science. 281:1509–1512. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Husain AN, Colby TV, Ordonez NG, et al: Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 133:1317–1331. 2009.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Attanoos RL and Gibbs AR: Pathology of malignant mesothelioma. Histopathology. 30:403–418. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nakano J, Huang C, Liu D, et al: The clinical significance of splice variants and subcellular localization of survivin in non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 98:1109–1117. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Katoh M, Kirikoshi H, Terasaki H and Shiokawa K: WNT2B2 mRNA, up-regulated in primary gastric cancer, is a positive regulator of the WNT-beta-catenin-TCF signaling pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 289:1093–1098. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zhang X, Gaspard JP and Chung DC: Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor by the Wnt and K-ras pathways in colonic neoplasia. Cancer Res. 61:6050–6054. 2001.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lu CD, Altieri DC and Tanigawa N: Expression of a novel anti-apoptosis gene, survivin, correlated with tumor cell apoptosis and p53 accumulation in gastric carcinomas. Cancer Res. 58:1808–1812. 1998.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kawasaki H, Altieri DC, Lu CD, Toyoda M, Tenjo T and Tanigawa N: Inhibition of apoptosis by survivin predicts shorter survival rates in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 58:5071–5074. 1998.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mita AC, Mita MM, Nawrocki ST and Giles FJ: Survivin: key regulator of mitosis and apoptosis and novel target for cancer therapeutics. Clin Cancer Res. 14:5000–5005. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Li F, Ambrosini G, Chu EY, et al: Control of apoptosis and mitotic spindle checkpoint by survivin. Nature. 396:580–584. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Adams RR, Carmena M and Earnshaw WC: Chromosomal passengers and the (aurora) ABCs of mitosis. Trends Cell Biol. 11:49–54. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Martinez A, Bellosillo B, Bosch F, et al: Nuclear survivin expression in mantle cell lymphoma is associated with cell proliferation and survival. Am J Pathol. 164:501–510. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Shinohara ET, Gonzalez A, Massion PP, et al: Nuclear survivin predicts recurrence and poor survival in patients with resected nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer. 103:1685–1692. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Brennan DJ, Rexhepaj E, O’Brien SL, et al: Altered cytoplasmicto nuclear ratio of survivin is a prognostic indicator in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 14:2681–2689. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Dang CV, Resar LM, Emison E, et al: Function of the c-Myc oncogenic transcription factor. Exp Cell Res. 253:63–77. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang G, Timme TL, Frolov A, Wheeler TM and Thompson TC: Combined c-Myc and caveolin-1 expression in human prostate carcinoma predicts prostate carcinoma progression. Cancer. 103:1186–1194. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Lu D, Kadota K, Ueno M, Nakashima N, Yokomise H and Huang CL: Adenoviral vector expressing short hairpin RNA targeting Wnt2B has an effective antitumour activity against Wnt2B2-overexpressing tumours. Eur J Cancer. Jun 4–2011, (Epub ahead of print). | |
|
Rao DD, Vorhies JS, Senzer N, et al: siRNA vs. shRNA: similarities and differences. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 61:746–759. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ma B, Zhang S, Jiang H, Zhao B and Lv H: Lipoplex morphologies and their influences on transfection efficiency in gene delivery. J Control Release. 123:184–194. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Watanabe Y, Kojima T, Kagawa S, et al: A novel translational approach for human malignant pleural mesothelioma: heparanase-assisted dual virotherapy. Oncogene. 29:1145–1154. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |
