Construction and verification of the targeted uPA‑shRNA lentiviral vector and evaluation of the transfection and silencing rate
- Authors:
- Published online on: May 28, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2014.1741
- Pages: 435-441
Abstract
Introduction
Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) is one of the most important family members of the serine proteolytic enzymes (1). In the human body, uPA combines with the uPA receptor under physical and pathological conditions, affecting cell migration, tissue reparation and mediating the hydrolysis of extracellular matrix proteins, the degradation of collagenase and the activation of other proteolytic enzymes, while also directly degrading the extracellular matrix and basilar membrane (2). uPA has also been shown to be highly associated with the invasion and metastasis of tumors and the inflammatory reaction of the synovium. A recent study demonstrated that the serine protease plays an important role in matrix metalloproteinase (MMPs)-mediated degradation of cartilage tissue in arthritis (3). Although uPA is an important member of the serine protease family, the mechanisms underlying uPA function in the MMP signaling transduction pathway remain unknown. Post-transcriptional gene silencing is known as RNA interference technology (RNAi) and can be used to specifically inhibit the regulation of gene expression following transcription. This new method is used for quick silencing of one specific gene (4). To date, the technique has been widely applied in functional genomes and gene therapy. In the present study, a lentiviral vector was constructed to specifically target the uPA gene in the New Zealand rabbit. The aim of the study was to establish the foundation for further research on the role of uPA in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA).
Materials and methods
Materials and reagents
A total of 3 New Zealand rabbits (age, 2 years) were purchased from the Experimental Animal Center of Xinjiang Medical University (Ürümqi, China). Escherichia coli (E. coli) DH5α and 293T cells had been preserved in the research center. The lentivirus-negative control (NC) and pGLV-H1-green fluorescent protein (GFP)+Puro vector were purchased from Zimmer Medical International Trading Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The restriction enzymes, BamHI and EcoRI, were obtained from MBI Fermentas (Amherst, NY, USA). The transfection reagent, Lipofectamine 2000, as well as TRIzol reagent and Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium/F12 culture medium were purchased from Invitrogen Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA). The Taq enzyme and plasmid extraction kit were obtained from Takara Bio, Inc. (Shiga, Japan), while the uPA antibody was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). All animals were maintained in the Animal Facility of the Shihezi University School of Medicine. The experimental protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Shihezi University, Shihezi, China.
Primer synthesis
Primers for uPA and the β-actin reference were designed using Oligo 6.0 software (Molecular Biology Insights, Inc. Cascade, CO, USA), which was conducted by Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology & Services Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The sequences of the primers were as follows: uPA upstream, 5′-ACTACATTG TCTACCTGGGTCGGTC-3′ and downstream, 5′-ATGCAA GATGAGTTGCTCCACTTC-3′ (amplification length, 86 bp); β-actin upstream, 5′-CAGGTCATCACCATCGGCAAC-3′ and downstream, 5′-GGATGTCCACGTCGCACTTCA-3′ (amplification length, 133 bp).
Cell culture
Cartilage tissue was obtained from the knee-joint of a two-year-old New Zealand rabbit. The cartilage cells were collected from cartilage tissue by repeated digestion for four times, then cultured at flask with culture medium at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator. The medium was changed every two days. Cells were observed under an inverted microscope and images and observations were recorded with regard to the cellular morphology and adherence conditions. Further experiments were conducted when the cells are 85–90% in a confluent state for later use.
Designing and synthesizing uPA-siRNA
Using GenBank, the uPA gene sequence in rabbits was identified (NM-001082011). Referring to the design principles of the targeted point of siRNA, four targeted points were selected and designed using GenePharma siRNA designer v 3.0 software (Shanghai GenePharma, Shanghai, China), which were P1, P2, P3 and P4 (Table I). A pervasive disturbing sequence was also designed as the NC. The structure of the small hairpin RNA (shRNA) chain was positive-sense strand-loop-antisense strand. Each group of sequences were designed and synthesized according to the hairpin structural model. Restriction enzyme digestion was conducted at the two ends of the molecules, thus, the specific gene sequence was inserted into the vector directly following digestion (Table II). The sequencing fragments were synthesized by Zimmer Medical International Trading Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China).
Interference lentiviral vector construction
As shown in Table II, following the dilution of the oligonucleotide fragments, double stranded DNA fragments were formed in the annealing reaction system. The pGLV-HI-GFP+Puro vector was linearized by BamHI and EcoRI restriction enzyme digestion (Fig. 1). Pure linearized vector fragments, double stranded DNA fragments and vector fragments were collected and combined together during a 12-h reaction. The recombinant vector loop was then transformed into the freshly prepared E. coli competent cells. Following E. coli cell culture for 16 h at 37°C, bacterial colonies were selected randomly as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) templates. Verification of the positive clones was conducted using PCR technology. The sequencing fragments were synthesized by Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology & Services Co., Ltd.
Recombinant lentiviron packaging and titering
Using uPA genes, RNAi lentiviral vectors and pMD2.G plasmids were tranfected together in 293T cells. After 8 h, the culture medium was changed to complete medium. The supernatant was concentrated and collected after culturing for 48 h. The virus titer of the 293T cells was determined using the dilution gradient method and calculated as follows: Virus titer (TU/ml) = (counted fluorescent cells/corresponding dilution times)/0.01. The transfected cells were stored in a −80°C refrigerator for later use.
Examination of cell transfection and the transfection rate
Packaged recombinant lentivirons were classified into three groups based on multiplicity of infection (MOI) values (1, 10 or 100), and were transfected into the cartilage cells separately. The culture medium was changed to complete medium at 6 h following transfection. Cells were cultured for 3 days, following which the expression level of GFP in the cells was observed using an inverted fluorescence microscope. The transfection rate was also analyzed using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, MD, USA).
Quantitative PCR (qPCR)
Total RNA was extracted at day 4 following transfection using TRIzol reagent. Reverse transcription of the RNA to cDNA was conducted using the RNA as a template, and then PCR-amplification of the uPA gene was performed using the cDNA as a template. The primers were designed by Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology & Services Co., Ltd. The qPCR conditions were as follows: Primary degeneration for 15 sec at 95°C, degeneration for 5 sec at 95°C and annealing for 30 sec at 60°C, which was repeated 40 times. Light absorption values were assayed at each extension stage. Following PCR, degeneration of the PCR product was conducted for 1 min at 95°C, which was then cooled-down to 55°C in order for the DNA double strands to combine together fully. A melting curve was constructed using the light absorption values.
Western blot analysis
Total protein was extracted at day 4 following transfection and gel-electrophoresis was conducted using 10% SDS-PAGE following protein quantification. Next, the proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and then incubated with primary antibodies including PLAU (1:5,000 dilute, GeneTex Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) and β-actin (1:10,000 dilute. Abcam Inc., Shanghai, China) overnight at 4°C followed with anti-rabbit second antibodies (1:10,000 dilute, GeneTex Inc.) at room-temperature for one hour. Enhanced chemiluminescence was used for detection. β-actin was used as the internal reference.
Statistical analysis
All the results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Data were analyzed by single factor analysis of variance and the t-test using SPSS 13.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Vector construction and verification of the positive clone using PCR
The size of the PCR amplification product, which was from the positive clone of the inserted shRNA sequence, was 384 bp according to the primer size. By contrast, the size of the PCR amplification product for the empty vector clone was 322 bp (Fig. 2). These results demonstrated that all five random clones were positive clones. The sequencing results of the shRNS carrier vector revealed the expected sequence, indicating that the shRNA vector was constructed successfully. DNA sequencing further demonstrated that the sequence was correct and showed no mutations.
Lentivirus packaging and viral titer
293T cells were transfected using the successfully constructed uPA RNAi lentiviral vectors and pMD2.G coated plasmids. Significant expression of GFP was observed under the fluorescence microscope after 40 h (Fig. 3), and the biological titer for the collected and concentrated virus was 1×108 TU/ml, as determined by the hole dilution method.
Examination of the lentivirus transfection rate
Transfection rates of the four lentiviral vectors in 293T cells and cartilage cells were observed under the various MOI values. The results demonstrated that with increasing MOI, the lentivirus transfection rate also improved. When the MOI was 100, the transfection rate was >85% (Fig. 4), which was which was used for the following experiments.
Examination of the interference rate of uPA-siRNA
Relative qPCR was performed with β-actin as the internal reference and the results were analyzed using the standard curve method. The results indicated that the mRNA expression level of uPA decreased significantly following transfection of P1, P2, P3 or P4 plasmids into the cartilage cells (Fig. 5). In addition, the corresponding rates for the empty plasmid and NC increased, further demonstrating that these four plasmids exhibited a significant inhibiting influence on uPA (Fig. 6). Furthermore, the knockout effectiveness for the P2 RNAi plasmid was better compared with the other three plasmids. This observation was confirmed by western blot analysis. The four plasmids all inhibited the protein expression of uPA, however, the knockout effectiveness for P2 and P3 RNAi plasmids was better compared with the P1 and P4 RNAi plasmids (Fig. 7; P<0.05). Therefore, the P2 plasmid may have the most efficient inhibiting effect on uPA.
Discussion
OA is a progressive degenerative disease with the main pathological feature of mechanical abnormalities in the cartilage tissue (5). Although there have been a number of comprehensive clinical and fundamental studies, the definite pathomechanism underlying the pathological changes remains unclear, thus, clinical treatment is becoming more difficult (6–8). In general, OA is considered to be a chronic degenerative disorder, involving all areas of the joint, including cartilage tissue, subchondral bone and the synovium (9). OA may be caused by a combination of multiple factors, including tissue damage, supersession, metabolization, genetics, heredity and immunization (10,11). Based on a number of in-depth studies that used molecular biological technology, it has been identified that MMPs, uPA, A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs, among other proteolytic enzymes, are the most fundamental factors contributing to the degradation process of cartilage tissue (12–16). In addition, the uPA that is secreted by macrophages in the synovium has been shown to play an important role in the primary stages of OA, by causing the synovial tissue to secrete large amounts of interleukin-1β, which in turn is involved in increasing the synovial inflammatory reaction and the degradation process. Furthermore, uPA can directly affect the degradation of the extracellular matrix in cartilage cells and activate zymogens of MMPs, transforming them into active protein degradation enzymes that upgrade the degradation of the extracellular matrix in cartilage cells. In addition, uPA is involved in the regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase and other signaling pathways, thus, can influence the metabolic process of cartilage cells (3,17,18). Therefore, reducing the early degenerative metabolic process of cartilage tissue can be achieved by inhibiting the expression of uPA in the synovial and cartilage tissues.
RNAi is a biological process that causes specific homologous mRNA degradation following internal or external double stranded RNA entering the cells. The technique inhibits the expression of the corresponding gene, which is followed by the phenomenon of specific gene deletion. RNAi technology was developed based on this model and has become a newly developed biotechnology in recent years. The technique is a much simpler, more efficient and powerful tool compared with gene knockout, and plays an important role in gene functioning and gene treatment. Numerous studies have shown that RNAi inhibits gene expression definitely, and even applying traces of siRNA can decrease the coded pathogenic gene production by 90% (19–21). Furthermore, RNAi can knockout all the specific genes during an experiment (22,23). Due to the cascading amplification effect and the highly penetrative characteristic of RNAi, its usage has a significant prospect in gene functional research and gene treatment. However, previous biochemistry and adenoviral vector methods resulted in inefficient and unstable transfection, thus, successful transfection of the RNAi sequence into the original targeted cells has become a barrier for the application of this procedure. However, as a result of the recent identification of the lentiviral vector, the transfection rate can reach 70% and gene expression is stable for a long time in cells during cell tranfection. In order to assess the effect of uPA in gene treatment for the early pathological changes of OA, in the present study, a specific targeted lentiviral vector was successfully constructed against the uPA gene in a New Zealand rabbit. The targeted sequence, which can highly silence the uPA gene, was screened out, thus, this study established the foundation for further research on the role of uPA in the pathogenesis of OA.
In conclusion, based on the uPA gene, the four designed shRNA recombinant lentiviral vectors were all shown to accomplish gene interference in the original cartilage cells of the New Zealand rabbit. Expression levels of the targeted uPA gene prior to and following silencing were compared using qPCR, and differences in the silencing effectiveness were identified among the four types of shRNA recombinant lentiviral vectors. Silencing effectiveness was closely associated with the targeted sequence and virus titer. The more concentrated the vectors during transfection, the better the silencing effect. The combined results from qPCR and western blot analysis revealed that P2 specific targeted-shRNA sequence exhibited significant silencing efficacy. The results of the present study have established the foundation for using this targeted point to improve the research on the application of uPA in OA development and gene treatment.
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation of China (nos. 30960387 and 81260453) and the Xinjiang Bingtuan Special Program of Medical Science (nos. 2013BA020, 2012BC002 and 2011BC004).
References
Eden G, Archinti M, Furlan F, Murphy R and Degryse B: The urokinase receptor interactome. Curr Pharm Des. 17:1874–1889. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kwaan HC and McMahon B: The role of plasminogen-plasmin system in cancer. Cancer Treat Res. 148:43–66. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kim KS, Lee YA, Choi HM, Yoo MC and Yang HI: Implication of MMP-9 and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) in the activation of pro-matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-13. Rheumatol Int. 32:3069–3075. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang JT and Gong SS: Effects of siRNA specific to the protein kinase CK2α on apoptosis of laryngeal carcinoma cells. Chin Med J (Engl). 125:1581–1585. 2012. | |
Zeng QY, Zang CH, Li XF, Dong HY, Zhang AL and Lin L: Associated risk factors of knee osteoarthritis: a population survey in Taiyuan, China. Chin Med J (Engl). 119:1522–1527. 2006.PubMed/NCBI | |
Racine J and Aaron RK: Pathogenesis and epidemiology of osteoarthritis. R I Med J. 96:19–22. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Maldonado M and Nam J: The role of changes in extracellular matrix of cartilage in the presence of inflammation on the pathology of osteoarthritis. Biomed Res Int. Aug 28–2013.(Epub ahead of print). View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sengupta K, Krishnaraju AV, Vishal AA, et al: Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 5-Loxin and Aflapin against osteoarthritis of the knee: a double blind, randomized, placebo controlled clinical study. Int J Med Sci. 7:366–377. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Iagnocco A and Naredo E: Osteoarthritis: research update and clinical applications. Rheumatology (Oxford). 51(Suppl 7): vii2–vii5. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Loeser RF: Aging processes and the development of osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 25:108–113. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Haseeb A and Haqqi TM: Immunopathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Clin Immunol. 146:185–196. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kapoor M, Martel-Pelletier J, Lajeunesse D, et al: Role of proinflammatory cytokines in the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 7:33–42. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mobasheri A: Osteoarthritis year 2012 in review: biomarkers. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 20:1451–1464. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Koskinen A, Vuolteenaho K, Nieminen R, et al: Leptin enhances MMP-1, MMP-3 and MMP-13 production in human osteoarthritic cartilage and correlates with MMP-1 and MMP-3 in synovial fluid from OA patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 29:57–64. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee AS, Ellman MB, Yan DA, et al: A current review of molecular mechanisms regarding osteoarthritis and pain. Gene. 527:440–447. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Murab S, Chameettachal S, Bhattacharjee M, Das S, Kaplan DL and Ghosh S: Matrix-embedded cytokines to simulate osteoarthritis-like cartilage microenvironments. Tissue Eng Part A. 19:1733–1753. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yeh CC, Chang SF, Huang TY, et al: Shear stress modulates macrophage-induced urokinase plasminogen activator expression in human chondrocytes. Arthritis Res Ther. 15:R532013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yuasa T, Otani T, Koike T, Iwamoto M and Enomoto-Iwamoto M: Wnt/beta-catenin signaling stimulates matrix catabolic genes and activity in articular chondrocytes: its possible role in joint degeneration. Lab Invest. 88:264–274. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kubowicz P, Żelaszczyk D and Pękala E: RNAi in clinical studies. Curr Med Chem. 20:1801–1816. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shim MS and Kwon YJ: Efficient and targeted delivery of siRNA in vivo. FEBS J. 277:4814–4827. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chu X, You H, Yuan X, et al: Protective effect of lentivirus-mediated siRNA targeting ADAMTS-5 on cartilage degradation in a rat model of osteoarthritis. Int J Mol Med. 31:1222–1228. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Wilson RC and Doudna JA: Molecular mechanisms of RNA interference. Annu Rev Biophys. 42:217–239. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Mekkawy AH, Morris DL and Pourgholami MH: Urokinase plasminogen activator system as a potential target for cancer therapy. Future Oncol. 5:1487–1499. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |