Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor by small interfering RNA upregulates differentiation, maturation and function of dendritic cells
- Authors:
- Published online on: November 11, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2014.2059
- Pages: 120-124
Abstract
Introduction
Dendritic cells (DCs) are potent bone marrow-derived antigen-presenting cells (1). DCs constitute a complex system of cells that is able to induce primary immune responses (2–4). In addition, DCs are effective in stimulating secondary immune responses (5). Thus, these cells play a central role in antitumor immunity. However, the function of the immune system in tumor-bearing hosts is often severely compromised, particularly in hosts with advanced-stage disease, who present with a diminished ability to activate immune responses against the tumor. Tumor cells appear to have developed mechanisms to inhibit immune system recognition and control (6). DCs may represent a target for the inhibition of antitumor immune responses (7).
Defective function of DCs in cancer has been reported by several study groups (8–12); however, the causes of DC impairment have not been fully elucidated. One of the possible mechanisms underlying DC dysfunction in cancer is the abnormal functional maturation of these cells from their progenitors (13,14) caused by tumor-derived factors (15–20). Despite significant advances in the understanding of the mechanisms responsible for cancer cell transformation and proliferation, the immunological pathophysiology of cancer patients, particularly the antitumor cytokine network, requires further investigation.
Angiogenetic processes appear to be regulated by cytokines. The cytokine vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) induced by hypoxia is produced by almost all tumors. VEGF directly stimulates the growth of vascular endothelial cells and the formation of tumor neovasculature (21–23). Abnormally high blood concentrations of VEGF have been shown to be associated with poor prognosis in solid as well as hematological malignancies (24). Inhibition of angiogenesis may be one of the mechanism through which the activation of effective anticancer immunity controls neoplastic growth (25–28).
In this study, we investigated the effect of culture supernatants from fresh primary MCF-7 cells on DCs by evaluating the effect of small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting VEGF, in an attempt to elucidate the association between VEGF and impaired DC differentiation. We cultured mononuclear cells from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in the presence of culture supernatants from fresh primary MCF-7 cells to evaluate the association of impaired DCs with tumor-derived factors. Subsequently, we downregulated VEGF expression by siRNA in MCF-7 cells and evaluated the effects of VEGF on DCs.
Materials and methods
siRNA design
The siRNA sequences that target human VEGF were constructed according to established guidelines (29). The primer sequences were 5′-GGAGUACCCUGAUGAGAUCUU-3′ (forward) and 5′-GAUCUCAUCAGGGUACUCCUU-3′ (reverse). The negative control scramble siRNA (siRNASCR) primer sequences were 5′-GCGUAACGCGGGAAUUUACUU-3′ (forward) and 5′-GUAAAUUCCCGCGUUACGCUU-3′ (reverse). These sequences were verified by DNA sequencing according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong, China).
MCF-7 cell culture and transfection
The MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line was kindly provided by the Cell Culture Center of the Peking Union Medical College of China and was cultured in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% fetal calf serum in a 37°C humidified 5% CO2 incubator. The medium was changed every two days. To maintain the cells at optimal proliferating conditions, they were passaged at 80% confluence and seeded at 20% confluence. Transfection was performed at ~90% confluence using Lipofectamine™ 2000 (Invitrogen Co., Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The cells were collected at 48 h following transfection and used for western blot analysis.
ELISA
The VEGF concentration in the conditioned medium of MCF-7 cells was measured using a commercially available human VEGF ELISA kit (Chemicon, Millipore Corporation, Temecula, CA, USA). MCF-7 cells were plated on a 96-well plate at a density of 6×103 cells/ml. After 24 h of culture, the cells were transfected with siRNA (25 nmol/l, 50 nmol/l, 100 nmol/l and 200 nmol/l), siRNASCR, or Lipofectamine reagent overnight at 37°C. The cultures were then washed twice with Hanks’ Balanced Salt solution and incubated with fresh medium for an additional 48 h. The supernatants were collected and VEGF concentration was quantified (pg/ml) by ELISA according to the manufacturer’s recommendations to determine the effect of specific downregulation and the optimal concentration of siRNA transfection.
MTT assay
Using a 96-well plate, a total of 8×103 MCF-7 cells were seeded in each well and allowed to attach for 18 h. The cells were later treated with siRNA (25 nmol/l, 50 nmol/l, 100 nmol/l or 200 nmol/l) or siRNASCR. At 48 h following transfection, 20 μl MTT (5 mg/ml) was added to the cells in each well. The cells were subsequently incubated for 4 h, followed by the addition of 100 μl dimethyl sulfoxide and the cells were incubated for another 15 min. The optical density was determined at 492 nm with a microculture plate reader (SpectraMax M2; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). To determine the inhibition rate, the absorbance values were normalized to the values obtained from the blank control group of cells.
Western blot analysis
Following treatment with 100 nmol/l siRNA or siRNASCR for 48 h, the MCF-7 cells attached to culture dishes were trypsinized and washed in cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Briefly, 100 μg protein samples were subjected to 10% standard SDS-PAGE, with prestained molecular weight markers being run in parallel to identify VEGF protein. Subsequently, the resolved proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membranes were then incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-VEGF antibody (cat. no. sc-7269; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin antibody (cat. no. sc-47778; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). antibodies. Following extensive washing, the membranes were incubated with anti-mouse IgG-horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antibody for 1 h at room temperature and developed with a Luminol chemiluminescence detection kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). Protein expression was quantified with a Gel EDAS analysis system and Gel-Pro Analyzer 3.1 software (Shenzhen Tianneng Corporation, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China).
DC culture
Human PBMCs were obtained from heparinized blood of healthy volunteers by density gradient centrifugation following informed consent. The cells were cultured for 5–6 days in complete RPMI-1640 medium [GlutaMAX (Invitrogen Co.), supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 g/ml streptomycin] with 100 ng/ml granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and 20 ng/ml interleukin-4 (IL-4). Maturation was induced for 48 h in the presence of 10 ng/ml tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). The DCs were divided into the siRNA and control groups. The DCs of the siRNA group were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium with the addition of the culture supernatant of MCF-7 cells transfected with siRNA (optimal concentration of 100 nmol/l) according to the volume ratio of 1:2 (supernatant vs. RPMI-1640). The DCs of the control group were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium with the addition of the culture supernatant of MCF-7 cells transfected with siRNASCR (100 nmol/l) according to the volume ratio of 1:2 (supernatant vs. RPMI-1640).
DC morphology imaging and flow cytometry
The DCs in the two groups were observed daily under an inverted Olympus microscope (Olympus Optical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with a green light filter. Following 8 days of culture, the DCs were stained by standard direct procedure using phycoerythrin-conjugated mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against CD1a (cat. no. 555807), CD80 (cat. no. 557227), CD83 (cat. no. 556855), CD86 (cat. no. 555658) or HLA-DR (cat. no. 555812; all from BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The cells were incubated with mAbs for 20–30 min at ambient temperature, washed twice with PBS and resuspended in 100 μl PBS. Cell fluorescence was analyzed by the Epics XL flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter Inc., Brea, CA, USA).
Mixed lymphocyte reaction
Responder T cells were purified from the PBMCs of healthy volunteers. T cells (1×106/ml) were co-cultured with DCs loaded with MCF-7 antigen for 72 h to induce cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). The CTLs were then collected and used as the effector cells in CTL assays. As the target cells, MCF-7 cells were placed in 96-well culture plates at lx104 cells per well and co-cultured with the effector cells at varied effector/target cell ratios (E/T) of l:10, 1:25 and l:50 for 48 h. The cytotoxic activity was detected with the MTT assay. The tests were performed in triplicate and the results are expressed as mean counts per minute with standard deviation.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 11.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data are expressed as the means ± SD. The results were considered statistically significant if P<0.05 was obtained by the appropriate ANOVA procedure and the Student’s t-test.
Results
VEGF-targeted siRNA inhibits the expression of VEGF in MCF-7 cells
In order to test whether siRNAs affect the expression of VEGF, we measured the VEGF concentration in the culture supernatants of MCF-7 cells transfected with siRNA (25 nmol/l, 50 nmol/l, 100 nmol/l or 200 nmol/l), siRNASCR or Lipofectamine reagent using ELISA and analyzed the proteins by western blotting. The ELISA data demonstrated that the VEGF expression and protein production in the supernatants of MCF-7 cells transfected with siRNA (100 nmol/l and 200 nmol/l) were significantly decreased compared to that in the controls; however, the level of VEGF protein was not significantly different between the 100 and the 200 nmol/l siRNA groups, or among the siRNASCR, Lipofectamine control and the blank control groups (Fig. 1). The western blot analysis demonstrated that VEGF expression was significantly reduced in cells transfected with siRNA compared to those transfected with siRNASCR or Lipofectamine (P<0.05) (Fig. 1). There was no significant difference among the siRNASCR, Lipofectamine and non-transfected groups (Fig. 2). These data suggested that the constructed VEGF-targeted siRNA inhibited the expression of VEGF.
Cultivation with the culture supernatants from MCF-7 cells treated with siRNA affects DC morphology
Optical microscopy was employed to investigate the effect of siRNA on DC morphology. Representative photographs taken on day 8 demonstrated that DCs generated from adherent human PBMCs of healthy donors in the presence of GM-CSF, IL-4 and TNF-α exhibited significant differences in morphology between the siRNA and siRNASCR groups (Fig. 3). The DCs in the blank control group exhibited typical arborizations (Fig. 3A). The PBMCs cultured with the culture supernatants from MCF-7 cells treated with siRNA started to elongate into irregular shapes on the 2nd or 3rd day and exhibited the morphological characteristics of DCs on the 8th day (Fig. 3B). The DCs in the siRNASCR group, cultured with the culture supernatants from MCF-7 cells transfected with siRNASCR, started to elongate marginally on the 3rd or 4th day, but exhibited no distinct DC characteristics until the 8th day (Fig. 3C). These data demonstrated that DC morphology was affected by cultivation with the culture supernatants from MCF-7 cells treated with siRNA.
siRNA alters the effect of VEGF on DC surface phenotypes
In order to investigate the effects of VEGF on DC differentiation in the culture supernatants from MCF-7 cells and determine how this effect is affected by VEGF-targeted siRNA, DCs were labeled with a mixture of phycoerythrin-conjugated lineage-specific antibodies (anti-HLA-DR, CD80, CD83, CD1a, CD86) and analyzed directly using flow cytometry. The expression of HLA-DR on DCs in the siRNA group was higher compared to that in the control group that was transfected with siRNASCR (Table I). Folllowing siRNA transfection, the percentage of cells expressing CD80, CD86 and CD83 was increased (Table I). However, the expression of CD1a in the siRNA group was lower compared to that in the control group (Table I). These data demonstrated that siRNA altered the effect of VEGF on DC surface phenotypes.
siRNA enhances the toxicity of CTLs induced by DCs
In order to detect the inhibition rates of tumor-specific CTLs against MCF-7 cells mediated by DCs cultured in different media, the MTT assay was used. The results of the MTT assay demonstrated that the inducing activity of DCs in the siRNA group was enhanced in comparison to DCs in the control group (siRNASCR). The cytotoxic activity of CTLs was most significant at E/T 1:50 (P<0.01) (Table II). These data indicated that the cytotoxic activity of CTLs mediated by DCs was significantly increased by transfection with siRNA.
Discussion
DCs play a central role in the induction of antitumor immune responses (30,31). Adequate DC function is crucial for effective antitumor control and successful cancer immunotherapy. The inadequate function of DCs in cancer may be one of the important mechanisms through which tumors escape immune system control. Cancer patients, particularly those with advanced-stage disease, have diminished ability to activate immune responses against the tumor. Although the mechanisms underlying this immune ‘defect’ are multifactorial, DC dysfunction plays a key role (32–36). DCs not only initiate T-cell responses, but are also involved in silencing T-cell immune responses. The functional activities of DCs mainly depend on their state of activation and differentiation. Terminally differentiated mature DCs may efficiently induce the development of effector T cells, whereas DCs are also involved in the maintenance of peripheral tolerance. However, accumulated DCs that are educated at the tumor site, act as functional inhibitors of tumor-specific immune responses in cancer. Our study demonstrated that the culture supernatants from primary MCF-7 cells inhibited the differentiation, maturation and function of DCs induced from the PBMCs of healthy donors.
We demonstrated that DCs cultured in the culture supernatants from MCF-7 cells transfected with VEGF-targeted siRNA exhibited upregulated expression of CD80, CD83, CD86 and HLA-DR, but a lower level of CD1a expression. T-lymphocyte stimulating activities and the capacity to induce CTL cytotoxicity were all enhanced. Our results strongly suggest that the soluble factor VEGF secreted by MCF-7 cells played an important role in tumor evasion from immune surveillance, which is one of the factors responsible for defective DC maturation (37). However, the detailed mechanisms underlying the effect of VEGF on DC maturation and function have not been fully elucidated. It was previously indicated that DCs play a dual role in immune regulation through cross-priming of T cells and immunosuppression (38). Dikov et al (39) reported that the direct impairment of DC function by VEGF is mediated primarily by VEGFR1/Flt-1. Therefore, further studies are required to determine the detailed mechanisms of the effect of VEGF on human DCs.
VEGF is produced by almost all tumor cells and is responsible for the formation of tumor neovasculature (40). Our data indicated that the designed siRNAs specifically inhibited VEGF expression in MCF-7 cells and the inhibition of DC maturation and function in the culture supernatants from siRNA-transfected cells was significantly decreased. These data suggested that VEGF may play a significant role in tumor development, progression and immunosuppression. VEGF-targeted siRNA may be effective in the induction of antitumor immune responses and the treatment of breast cancer.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grants from the Qingdao Science and Technology Project (no. 07-2-1-7-nsh) and the Young Investigator Award of Qingdao University (no. 2007-1-11).
References
Steinman RM and Cohn ZA: Identification of a novel cell type in peripheral lymphoid organs of mice. I Morphology, quantitation, tissue distribution. J Exp Med. 137:1142–1162. 1973. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cella M, Sallusto F and Lanzavecchia A: Origin, maturation and antigen presenting function of dendritic cells. Curr Opin Immunol. 9:10–16. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hart DN: Dendritic cells: unique leukocyte populations which control the primary immune response. Blood. 90:3245–3287. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Steinman RM: The dendritic cell system and its role in immunogenicity. Annu Rev Immunol. 9:271–296. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Banchereau J and Steinman RM: Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature. 392:245–252. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Baird JR, Fox BA, Sanders KL, et al: Avirulent Toxoplasma gondii generates therapeutic antitumor immunity by reversing immunosuppression in the ovarian cancer microenvironment. Cancer Res. 73:3842–3851. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schuler G and Steinman RM: Dendritic cells as adjuvants for immune-mediated resistance to tumors. J Exp Med. 186:1183–1187. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gabrilovich D, Ciernik F and Carbone DP: Dendritic cells in anti-tumor immune responses. I Defective antigen presentation in tumor-bearinghosts. Cell Immunol. 170:101–110. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chaux P, Moutet M, Faivre J, Martin F and Martin M: Inflammatory cells infiltrating human colorectal carcinomas express HLA class II but not B7-1 and B7-2 costimulatory molecules of the T-cell activation. Lab Invest. 74:975–983. 1996.PubMed/NCBI | |
Chaux P, Favre N, Martin M and Martin F: Tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells are defective in their antigen-presenting function and inducible B7 expression in rats. Int J Cancer. 72:619–624. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gabrilovich DI, Corak J, Ciernik IF, Kavanaugh D and Carbone DP: Decreased antigen presentation by dendritic cells in patients with breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 3:483–490. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Nestle FO, Burg G, Fah J, Wrone-Smith T and Nickoloff BJ: Human sunlight-induced basal-cell-carcinoma-associated dendritic cells are deficient in T cell co-stimulatory molecules and are impaired as antigen-presenting cells. Am J Pathol. 150:641–651. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Gabrilovich DI, Nadaf S, Corak J, Berzofsky JA and Carbone DP: Dendritic cells in antitumor immune responses. II Dendritic cells grown from bone marrow precursors, but not mature DC from tumor-bearing mice are effective antigen carriers in the therapy of established tumors. Cell Immunol. 170:111–119. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gabrilovich DI, Chen HL, Girgis KR, et al: Production of vascular endothelial growth factor by human tumors inhibits the functional maturation of dendritic cells. Nat Med. 2:1096–1103. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ratta M, Fagnoni F, Curti A, et al: Dendritic cells are functionally defective in multiple myeloma: the role of interleukin-6. Blood. 100:230–237. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Um SH, Mulhall C, Alisa A, et al: Alpha-fetoprotein impairs APC function and induces their apoptosis. J Immunol. 173:1772–1778. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Péguet-Navarro J, Sportouch M, Popa I, et al: Gangliosides from human melanoma tumors impair dendritic cell differentiation from monocytes and induce their apoptosis. J Immunol. 170:3488–3494. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sombroek CC, Stam AG, Masterson AJ, et al: Prostanoids play a major role in the primary tumor-induced inhibition of dendritic cell differentiation. J Immunol. 168:4333–4343. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bockorny B and Dasanu CA: Intrinsic immune alterations in renal cell carcinoma and emerging immunotherapeutic approaches. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 13:911–925. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Harimoto H, Shimizu M, Nakagawa Y, Nakatsuka K, Wakabayashi A, Sakamoto C and Takahashi H: Inactivation of tumor-specific CD8+ CTLs by tumor-infiltrating tolerogenic dendritic cells. Immunol Cell Biol. 91:545–555. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Toi M, Taniguchi T, Yamamoto Y, Kurisaki T, Suzuki H and Tominaga T: Clinical significance of the determination of angiogenic actors. Eur J Cancer. 32A:2513–2519. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ellis LM and Fidler IJ: Angiogenesis and metastasis. Eur J Cancer. 32A:2451–2460. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ferrara N and Davis-Smyth T: The biology of vascular endothelial growth factor. Endocr Rev. 18:4–25. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Salven P, Mänpää H, Orpana A, Alitalo K and Joensuu H: Serum vascular endothelial growth factor is often elevated in disseminated cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 3:647–651. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ni YH, Wang ZY, Huang XF, et al: Effect of siRNA-mediated downregulation of VEGF in Tca8113 cells on the activity of monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Oncol Lett. 3:885–892. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Hajrasouliha AR, Funaki T, Sadrai Z, Hattori T, Chauhan SK and Dana R: Vascular endothelial growth factor-C promotes alloimmunity by amplifying antigen-presenting cell maturation and lymphangiogenesis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 53:1244–1250. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Marti LC, Pavon L, Severino P, Sibov T, Guilhen D and Moreira-Filho CA: Vascular endothelial growth factor-A enhances indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression by dendritic cells and subsequently impacts lymphocyte proliferation. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 109:70–79. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Liu CZ, Zhang L, Chang XH, et al: Overexpression and immunosuppressive functions of transforming growth factor 1, vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukin-10 in epithelial ovarian cancer. Chin J Cancer Res. 24:130–137. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Takei Y, Kadomatsu K, Yuzawa Y, Matsuo S and Muramatsu T: A small interfering RNA targeting vascular endothelial growth factor as cancer therapeutics. Cancer Res. 64:3365–3370. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Walter S, Weinschenk T, Stenzl A, et al: Multipeptide immune response to cancer vaccine IMA901 after single-dose cyclophosphamide associates with longer patient survival. Nat Med. 18:1254–1261. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cubillos-Ruiz JR, Baird JR, Tesone AJ, et al: Reprogramming tumor-associated dendritic cells in vivo using miRNA mimetics triggers protective immunity against ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 72:1683–1693. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gabrilovich DI, Ciernik IF and Carbone DP: Dendritic cells in antitumor immune responses. I Defective antigen presentation in tumor-bearing hosts. Cell Immunol. 170:101–110. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gabrilovich DI, Corak J, Ciernik IF, Kavanaugh D and Carbone DP: Decreased antigen presentation by dendritic cells in patients with breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 3:483–490. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Gabrilovich DI, Chen HL, Girgis KR, et al: Production of vascular endothelial growth factor by human tumors inhibits the functional maturation of dendritic cells. Nat Med. 2:1096–1103. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mosca PJ, Hobeika AC, Colling K, et al: Multiple signals are required for maturation of human dendritic cells mobilized in vivo with Flt3 ligand. J Leukoc Biol. 72:546–553. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
Scarlett UK, Rutkowski MR, Rauwerdink AM, et al: Ovarian cancer progression is controlled by phenotypic changes in dendritic cells. J Exp Med. 209:495–506. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gabrilovich DI, Chen HL, Girgis KR, et al: Production of vascular endothelial growth factor by human tumors inhibits the functional maturation of dendritic cells. Nat Med. 2:1096–1103. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Woltman AM and van Kooten C: Functional modulation of dendritic cells to suppress adaptive immune responses. J Leukoc Biol. 73:428–441. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dikov MM, Ohm JE, Ray N, et al: Differential roles of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1 and 2 in dendritic cell differentiation. J Immunol. 174:215–222. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Leung DW, Cachianes G, Kuang WJ, Goeddel DV and Ferrara N: Vascular endothelial growth factor is a secreted angiogenic mitogen. Science. 246:1306–1309. 1989. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |