Effect of temozolomide on livin and caspase-3 in U251 glioma stem cells
- Authors:
- Published online on: December 18, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2014.2144
- Pages: 744-750
-
Copyright: © Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Glioblastoma is the most common and most devastating type of primary brain tumor. At present, the treatment of glioblastoma involves surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, all of which are acknowledged as palliative measures, meaning that they do not provide a cure, and the median survival time for patients with glioblastoma multiforme is only ~14.6 months (1,2). On this basis, it is necessary to find new methods to improve the treatment of glioblastoma.
There is compelling evidence that cancer stem cells play a key role in cancer drug resistance, occurrence and development; CD133+ cells are regarded as having self-renewal and infinite proliferation abilities (3). Based on the concept of cancer stem cells, a new mode of tumor resistance has been identified. The natural resistance mechanism of cancer stem cells, including the adoption of a resting state, the ability to repair DNA, the expression of ABC transporters and resistance to apoptosis, all lead to stem cells remaining following chemotherapy (4). It has been found that only 100 CD133+ stem cells are required to successfully establish a new glioma when serially transplanted (5). The biological characteristics of cancer stem cells may led to the failure of long-term chemotherapy; the overexpression of multidrug resistance proteins (MRPs) has been observed in cancer stem cells isolated from certain solid tumors. MRPs provide tumor progenitor cells with resistance to the killing effect of cytotoxic drugs and alter the differentiation of cells (6). Therefore, the study of glioma stem cells may be a key step to solving the problem of tumor chemotherapy failure and tumor recurrence.
The present study investigated the expression of livin in glioma cells, including glioma stem cells. Temozolomide (TMZ) intervention in a cell model with lentivirus transfection was used to investigate the changes in the expression of livin and the associated caspase-3 in U251 glioma cells and U251 stem cells. The effects on the cell cycle of the changes in livin expression and TMZ intervention were also examined.
Materials and methods
Chemicals and reagents
Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12 Ham’s (DMEM/F12) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from HyClone (Logan, UT, USA). B-27 (50X) Serum-Free Supplement was from Gibco (Grand Island, NY, USA). Epidermal growth factor (EGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) were obtained from Peprotech (Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) was obtained from ProSpec-Tany TechnoGene Ltd. (Rehovot, Israel). The CD133 cell isolation kit [magnetic cell sorting (MACS) method] was purchased from Miltenyi Biotec GmbH (Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Antibodies to nestin, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and tubulin-β were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Cell Counting kit-8 (CCK-8) was obtained from Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Inc. (Kumamoto, Japan). Cell Cycle and Apoptosis Analysis kits and trypsin were obtained from Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology (Shanghai, China). Lentivirus was purchased from Shanghai GeneChem Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
Glioma cell line culture
The U251 glioblastoma cell line was provided by China Center for Typical Culture Collection (CCTCC, Wuhan, China). The cell line was cultured in a medium containing DMEM/F12, 10% FBS, 100 U/ml benzylpenicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin, under conditions of 37°C, 5% CO2 and saturated humidity.
Isolation and identification of CD133+ glioma stem cells
The U251 cells were collected and inoculated at low density into a serum-free medium [neural stem cell (NSC) medium] that contained DMEM/F12, 20 ng/ml EGF, 20 ng/ml bFGF, 10 ng/ml LIF and B-27 (1X). The cells were placed in an incubator under conditions of 37°C, 5% CO2 and saturated humidity. Once every 3–4 days, half of the medium was replaced. After the neurospheres had grown in large quantities, the spheres were collected and CD133+ cells were separated by a MACS technique. The sorting process was conducted according to the instructions of the CD133 cell isolation kit.
The well-grown cell spheres were selected for growing on polylysine-coated slides. After drying at 37°C, the slides were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) three times in order to clear away the medium. At room temperature, the cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde for 30 min, and then washed with PBS again three times. After blocking with 5% goat serum at 37°C for 30 min, rabbit anti-human nestin (1:200; primary antibody) was added and the cells were placed in a wet box overnight. The day following PBS washing, goat anti-rabbit IgG-FITC antibody (secondary antibody) was added for incubation for 30 min at 37°C. In addition, a negative control assay in which PBS was used instead of the primary antibody was performed. The slides were observed with an Olympus IX71 fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The immunofluorescence assay procedures for the detection of GFAP and β-tubulin on differentiated glioma stem cells were as described for nestin, with the exception that respective primary antibodies were used.
Cell morphology observation
After the TMZ (0, 25, 50, 100, 200 or 400 μmol/l) had been added to the cells for 48 h, the cell morphology was observed with an inverted microscope (Olympus CKX41; magnification, ×10).
Transfection with lentivirus
Cells (1×105) were inoculated into 6-well plates. According to the instructions of the lentivirus transfection reagent, and with multiplicities of infection (MOI) determined in a preliminary experiment (U251 cells, MOI=5; U251 stem cells, MOI=10), lentivirus encoding livin or small hairpin RNA (shRNA) against livin was directly mixed with the enhanced infection solution (slow virus diluent), and then mixed with 500 μl culture medium under conditions of 37°C, 5% CO2 and saturated humidity. After 20 h of contact with the cells, the lentivirus medium was replaced with ordinary medium. Three days later, lentiviral transfection was observed under a fluorescence microscope. The transfection procedures were conducted using biological safety equipment.
CCK-8 assay for cell survival analysis
Following treatment with the various concentrations of TMZ for 48 h, the cell survival rate was determined using the CCK-8 solution according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells in 96-well plate were treated with 10 μl CCK-8 solution, and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. The absorbance (A) of each well was quantified at 450 nm using an automated ELISA reader (Bio-Tek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). The cell survival rate (%) was calculated as follows: [A(experimental well) − A(blank well)]/[A(control well) − A(blank well)] × 100.
Cell cycle assay by flow cytometry
Following treatment with the various concentrations of TMZ for 48h, the cell cycles of the U251 cells and U251 stem cells were determined by flow cytometry. Briefly, the culture medium was collected, and the treated cells were digested with 0.05% trypsin for 3–5 min. The digested cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline, and then fixed in 70% ethyl alcohol overnight. Then, ~1×106 cells were incubated with the cell cycle detection kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions prior to analysis by flow cytometry (BD™ LSR II; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lanes, NJ, USA). Control cells (transfected with an empty vector) were similarly processed.
Quantitative PCR (qPCR)
Following treatment of the U251 and U251 stem cells with the various concentrations of TMZ for 48 h, or with 400 μmol/l TMZ for various times (0, 24, 48 and 72h), qPCR was performed as described in a previous study by the authors (7). The cell samples (1×106) were collected and combined with 1 ml TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions, in order to obtain the total RNA from the U251 cells and U251 stem cells. The RNA solution was stored at −80°C until used. All reactions were performed in duplicate with a negative control (no template) and the mean threshold cycle value (the start of exponential amplification) of each sample was normalized with the threshold cycle value of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), to provide the ΔCt value. qPCR was performed using a 7900HT Sequence Detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Reverse transcription was performed with M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Takara Bio, Inc., Shiga, Japan). The reverse transcriptional reaction system including 5.5 μl H2O, 1.0 μl oligo(dT)18 (50 μg/ml) and 6.0 μl total RNA was heated to 70°C for 5 min and then chilled with ice to unfold the mRNA secondary structure; and the subsequent step included 0.5 μl RNasin (40 U/μl), 4.0 μl 5X buffer, 2.0 μl dNTP (10 mM) and 1.0 μl RTase (200 U/μl), with heating to 42°C for 60 min, 95°C for 5 min and chilling to 4°C. The qPCR reaction was performed with SYBR-Green I fluorochrome. A standard curve was obtained and the cycle threshold (Ct) value was calculated.
Each 50 μl PCR system contained 1/50 of the original cDNA, 7 μl (25 mM) MgCl2, 0.8 μl (20 pmol/μl) each primer, 1 μl (10 mM) dNTP, 1 μl SYBR-Green I, 0.5 μl (5 U/μl) Taq DNA polymerase (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) and 5 μl 10X buffer. Fifty cycles of amplification were performed: 94°C for 30 sec, 57°C for 30 sec, then 72°C for 30 sec. The fluorescence signal was detected at the end of each cycle. Melting curve analysis was used to confirm the specificity of the products. The 2−ΔΔCT method was used to analyze the results (8). The primers were as follows: homo-livin, forward: 5′-GCTGTCAGTTCCTGCTCCGGTC-3′ and reverse: 5′-CAGGGGCTGCGTCTTCCGGTTC-3′; homo-caspase-3, forward: 5′-GAAGCGAATCAATGGACTCTGG-3′ and reverse: 5′-GTTTGCTGCATCGACATCTGTAC-3′.
Statistical analysis
Each test was performed in triplicate. The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons of the data were performed with Student’s t-test and one-way analysis of variance. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software, version 13.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
Cell morphology
CD133+ cells were successfully separated from U251 glioma cells by an immunomagnetic bead technique. The stem cells began to grow together and form cell spheres after 3 days in the NCS medium. The cells tested positive for nestin. The stem cell spheres were induced to break up after 7 days in serum medium, and diverse cell morphology was observed: the cells were attached, triangular, rounded or irregular in form, with elongated cell bodies, and stained positive for GFAP and β-tubulin. These observations confirmed that the stem cells had been induced to differentiate into neural cells (Fig. 1).
Under an inverted microscope, following 48 h of TMZ intervention, U251 cell and U251 stem cell proliferation was inhibited. For the U251 cells, cell death was observed; the cell density was significantly lower than that of the control group and cell shrinkage, cell nucleus disintegration and the presence of cell fragments floating on the medium surface were observed. For the U251 stem cells, the morphology of the stem cell spheres changed, the cells became gray and breakdown of the nucleus was observed, but no cell fragments were present.
Cell survival
A CCK-8 kit was used to detect the cell activity of the U251 cells and stem cells following TMZ intervention for 48 h. The degree of proliferation of the U251 cells and U251 stem cells at the same concentration and intervention time was as follows: livin-overexpressing group > control group > livin-shRNA group. It was observed that the adherent U251 cells proliferated faster than the U251 tumor stem cells in the presence of the same TMZ concentration for the same treatment time. TMZ inhibited the cell proliferation of livin-overexpressing U251 cells and U251 stem cells (P<0.05; Fig. 2).
qPCR results
qPCR demonstrated that there were higher expression levels of livin and caspase-3 in the U251 glioma stem cells than in the U251 glioma cells. TMZ effectively inhibited the expression of livin in the U251 cells and U251 stem cells in all cell models (P<0.05). The expression levels of livin were reduced as the concentration of TMZ increased (Table I). The levels of caspase-3 tended to increase as the concentration of TMZ increased (Table II). When the same concentration of TMZ was used, the expression levels of livin and caspase-3 were reduced and increased, respectively, as the treatment time was prolonged (Table III). The overexpression of livin and low expression of caspase-3 may enhance the proliferation of cells, including that of stem cells. TMZ increased the expression of caspase-3 and downregulated the expression of livin both in U251 cells and stem cells.
Table ImRNA expression levels of livin prior to and following treatment with various concentrations of TMZ for 48 h (mean ± SD). |
Table IImRNA expression levels of caspase-3 prior to and following treatment with various concentrations of TMZ for 48 h (mean ± SD). |
Table IIImRNA expression levels of livin and caspase-3 following treatment with 400 μmol/l TMZ for various times (data presented as mean ± SD). |
Cell cycle
In the U251 cell group, compared with the respective transfected control group, the livin-overexpressing group had an increased proportion of cells in the G2-M phase, whereas the livin-shRNA group had marked increases in the proportions of cells in the S and G2-M phases (P<0.05). Following 48 h of exposure to 400 μmol/l TMZ, the control and livin-shRNA groups demonstrated increases in the proportions of cells in the G2-M phase, whereas the livin-overexpressing group had an increased proportion of cells in the S phase (P<0.05). These results indicate that the effect of TMZ on the cell cycle was different from that on the blank control group following transfection with the two lentiviruses.
For U251 stem cells, compared with the respective blank control group, the livin-overexpressing and shRNA groups demonstrated slight increases in the proportion of cells in the S phase of the cell cycle (P<0.05). Following intervention with 400 μmol/l TMZ for 48 h, the blank control group underwent an increase in the S phase, the livin-overexpressing group had marked increases in the proportion of cells in the G0 and G2-M phases and the livin-shRNA group had increases in the S and G2-M phases (P<0.05; Fig. 3).
Discussion
According to the theory of antiapoptotic gene expression, the proliferation and apoptosis of tumors occurs due to gene expression imbalance (9). Gene expression is controlled by various factors in vitro and in vivo; the expression of antiapoptotic genes causes a reduction of cell apoptosis, eventually leading to malignant cell proliferation. Therefore, the investigation of methods for the effective induction of cell apoptosis in order to cure cancer have become a focus for numerous studies. Livin (also known as KIAP or ML-IAP) is a member of the apoptosis suppressor protein (inhibitor of apoptosis protein; IAP) family. Among the eight members of the IAP family, only livin has two subunits (α and β); thus, livin has a stronger antiapoptotic effect compared with the other members (10). It plays a key role in cell apoptosis and proliferation, and the cell cycle (11). Members of the IAP family have a repetitive BIR structural domain and/or a RING domain. A previous study demonstrated that the antiapoptotic mechanisms of the IAP family mainly involve the direct interaction of the BIR structural domain with a combination of caspases 3 and 8, which blocks caspase activation and prevents apoptosis (12). Since 2005, our group have observed that the overexpression of livin in U251 glioma cells and the associated stem cells blocks the antiapoptotic induction channel, restricting the transduction of death signals, and has a close relationship with chemotherapy resistance (7,13,14). Results have indicated that livin and caspase are closely related, as they play important roles in apoptotic and anti-apoptotic processes, respectively. The expression of livin was inhibited more strongly in the U251 cells than in the U251 stem cells, which indicates that stem cells have a stronger resistance to TMZ than U251 cells have under the same conditions.
Caspases are cysteine proteases that regulate apoptosis. They are able to promote apoptosis through the protease cascade reaction. Caspase proteins may be divided into three categories: apoptosis initiators (caspase-9), apoptosis executioners (caspase-3 and -7) and inflammation mediators (15). Livin executes an antiapoptotic effect mainly through controlling the cascading activation reaction regulated by combined caspase proteins. Nachmias found that livin combines with caspase-9, thereby exerting an antiapoptotic effect in the initial phase of apoptosis (12). Caspase family proteases are the key proteases for promoting apoptosis. They may be activated both by the death receptor and mitochondrial-mediated cell apoptosis pathways. In particular, caspase-3-mediated apoptosis is the key mechanism of cell apoptosis (16). Activated caspase proteins have been shown to hydrolyze a large number of molecular proteins in cells, and finally lead to cell death, as indicated by both biological chemistry and morphological analysis (12). In the present study, the expression of caspase-3 increased as the TMZ concentration and TMZ intervention time increased. Cell apoptosis was consequently induced, which caused the number of tumor cells to decrease and inhibited tumor growth.
TMZ is a commonly used chemotherapy agent for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. The mechanism of the cytotoxic effect of TMZ is mainly through the methylation of the guanine O6 position of the DNA repair protein O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase (MGMT), which changes its structure and reduces its activity (17). Although TMZ is able to increase the 2-year survival rate of patients significantly, long-term survivors are seldom found. The biological characteristics of cancer stem cells may be the cause of the failure of long-term chemotherapy; MRPs are expressed in the cancer stem cells isolated from certain solid tumors, and may provide the tumor progenitor cells with resistance to the killing effect of cytotoxic drugs and alter the differentiation of cells. TMZ may efficiently inhibit cell proliferation rather than induce cell death in cancer stem cells (18). The study by Beier et al provided the important evidence that CD133+ cancer stem cells display resistance to conventional chemotherapy drugs; the CD133+ levels of recurrent tumors are higher than those of primary tumors in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (19). Overmeyer et al reported that TMZ caused the aging and apoptosis of glioblastoma multiforme cells, and that mutations of tumor suppressor genes, such as P53, could reduce the sensitivity of the cells to TMZ-induced apoptosis. There is also certain evidence indicating that TMZ may overcome the resistance of glioblastoma multiforme to apoptosis by inducing autophagy (20). In the present study, following TMZ intervention, the results showed that TMZ inhibited the apoptosis process by inhibiting the expression of livin, increasing the expression of caspase-3 and arresting the cell cycle.
Based on the above observations and the previous study results, by using lentiviral transfection technology, cell models including overexpression, natural expression and silenced expression of livin were successfully constructed. The results demonstrated that livin plays an important role in the process of cell proliferation; the higher the expression level of livin, the faster cells proliferate. Following TMZ intervention, it was found that the mechanism of impact on the cell cycle differed between cancer stem cells and normal cells with the same intervention. The U251 cells stagnated in the G2-M phase, whereas the U251 stem cells stagnated in the S phase. The expression levels of caspase-3 increased as the concentration of TMZ increased. Caspase-3 may accelerate apoptosis and has a certain relationship with the expression of livin; however, the mechanism is not yet clear and requires further study.
Acknowledgements
This study was sponsored by the China National Science Fund (No. 81071779/H1607) and Shandong Provincial Fund for Awarding Excellent Young and Middle-age Scientist (No. BS2010YY006).
The study was performed in the Laboratory of General Surgery and Central Laboratory of Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The authors would like to acknowledge the staff of these laboratories for their assistance.
References
Hingtgen S, Ren XH, Terwilliger E, et al: Targeting multiple pathways in glioma with stem cell and viral delivered S-TRAIL and temozolomide. Mol Cancer Ther. 7:3575–3585. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Norden AD and Wen PY: Glioma therapy in adults. Neurologist. 12:279–292. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu GT, Yuan XP, Zeng ZH, et al: Analysis of gene expression and chemoresistance of CD133+ cancer stem cells in glioblastoma. Mol Cancer. 5:67–79. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dean M, Fojo T and Bates S: Tumour stem cells and drug resistance. Nat Rev Cancer. 5:275–284. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gilbert CA and Ross AH: Cancer stem cell: cell culture, markers and targets for new therapies. J Cell Biochem. 108:1031–1038. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Beier D, Röhrl S, Pillai DR, et al: Temozolomide preferentially depletes cancer stem cells in glioblastoma. Cancer Res. 68:5706–5715. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jin F, Zhao L, Zhao HY, et al: Comparison between cells and cancer stem-like cells isolated from glioblastoma and astrocytoma on expression of anti-apoptotic and multidrug resistance-associated protein genes. Neuroscience. 154:541–550. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar | |
LaCasse EC, Baird S, Korneluk RG and MacKenzie AE: The inhibitors of apoptosis (IAPs) and their emerging role in cancer. Oncogene. 17:3247–3259. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lopes RB, Gangeswaran R, McNeish IA, et al: Expression of the IAP protein family is dysregulated in pancreatic cancer cells and is important for resistance to chemotherapy. Int J Cancer. 120:2344–2352. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yan B: Research progress on livin protein: an inhibitor of apoptosis. Mol Cell Biochem. 357:39–45. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nachmias B, Ashab Y, Bucholtz V, et al: Caspase-mediated cleavage converts livin from an antiapoptotic to a proapoptotic factor: implications for drug-resistant melanoma. Cancer Res. 63:6340–6349. 2003.PubMed/NCBI | |
Jin F, Zhao L, Zhao HY, et al: Paradoxical expression of anti-apoptotic and MRP genes on cancer stem-like cell isolated for TJ905 glioblastoma multiforme cell line. Cancer Invest. 26:338–343. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jin F, Zhao L, Guo YJ, et al: Influence of Etoposide on antiapoptotic and multidrug resistance-associated protein genes in CD133 positive U251 glioblastoma stem-like cells. Brain Res. 1336:103–111. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ma YB and Chang HY: Caspase work model during pathogen infection. Virol Sin. 26:366–375. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
He X, Nie H, Hong Y, et al: SIRT2 activity is required for the survival of C6 glioma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 417:468–472. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ryu CH, Yoon WS, Park KY, et al: Valproic acid downregulates the expression of MGMT and sensitizes temozolomide-resistant glioma cells. J Biomed Biotechnol. 1–9. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Fisher T, Galanti G, Lavie G, et al: Mechanisms operative in the antitumor activity of temozolomide in glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer J. 13:335–344. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Beier D, Schulz JB and Beier CP: Chemoresistance of glioblastoma cancer stem cells - much more complex than expected. Mol Cancer. 10:128–139. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Overmeyer JH, Young AM, Bhanot H and Maltese WA: A chalcone-related small molecule that induces methuosis, a novel form of non-apoptotic cell death in glioblastoma cells. Mol Cancer. 10:69–86. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar |