Inhibitory effect of bone morphogenetic protein-2 on the proliferation of giant cell tumor of bone stromal cells in vitro
- Authors:
- Published online on: November 12, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2856
- Pages: 309-314
Abstract
Introduction
Giant cell tumor of bone (GCT) is a rare and commonly benign tumor that accounts for ~5% of primary bone tumors and 15–20% of all benign bone tumors in adults (1,2). GCT also exhibits a slight increase in prevalence in females and usually occurs in the third and fourth decades of life (1). Surgical curettage is a preferred treatment; however, it may be associated with a high local recurrence rate (18–50%) and occasionally lung metastasis (3,4). Recently, less-aggressive surgical resection, followed by extended intralesional curettage and cementation (or bone graft) with or without the use of adjuvant therapies, such as physical methods (blurring, hypothermic or hyperthermic reagents), chemical methods (phenol or hydrogen peroxide) and biologic modalities (bisphosphonates, interferon or denosumab) have been used to eliminate tumor remnants (1,3,5,6).
GCTs have been found to include three major cell types: Multinucleated giant cells that express calcitonin receptors, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase activity and other phenotypic osteoclast markers; a CD68-positive monocyte or macrophage population; and mononuclear fibroblast-like stromal cells that are able to proliferate in cell culture. Stromal cells are likely to be the neoplastic components of this tumor and regulate the formation of osteoclast-like giant cells in the neoplasm (7).
Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), members of the transforming growth factor-β superfamily, were originally studied as inducers of bone and cartilage formation and are also regulators of human carcinoma cell, differentiation, proliferation, morphogenesis and apoptosis (8–10). BMP-2 exhibits potent activity in the induction of cartilage and bone formation in vivo and in vitro (11,12). BMP-2 also plays key roles in cell proliferation, chemotaxis, angiogenesis, apoptosis and differentiation (13–17). The effects of BMP-2 are mediated via serine-threonine kinase receptors: BMP receptor type 1A (BMPR1A), BMPR1B and BMPR2. When BMPR2 is activated by binding to BMP-2, this induces the phosphorylation of BMPR1A and the recruitment of downstream signaling Smad1, Smad5 and Smad8 (receptor-regulated Smads), which then form heteromeric complexes with Smad4 (common-mediator Smad), and translocate to the nucleus to regulate the transcription of target genes (18,19). In addition, non-Smad mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways including p38, c-jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2) pathways, which are also important in cell proliferation and differentiation, may be activated by BMP (20–22).
Since its approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2002, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) has become one of the most commonly used bone graft substitutes. A previous study revealed that GCT stromal cells (GCTSCs) might have the ability to differentiate into osteoblasts that are responsive to BMP-2 (23). However, the role of BMP-2 in GCTSCs remains unclear. The inhibitory effect of BMP-2 on GCTSC proliferation has been investigated in only a few in vitro studies (23,24), and no in vivo studies. Therefore, preclinical studies are required to evaluate the effect of BMP-2 on tumor growth. The purpose of the present study was to assess whether rhBMP-2 promotes or suppresses GCT growth in vitro. The results may provide background data useful in the evaluation of the potential of rhBMP-2 as an adjuvant therapy for patients following the removal of GCT by surgery.
Materials and methods
Specimens
This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and with approval from the Ethics Committee of Guangzhou Liu Hua Qiao Hospital (Guangzhou, China). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Nine GCT specimens were freshly harvested and then used for primary cell culture. None of the patients had taken any medication prior to the surgery. Clinical information for each patient is not shown. The initial diagnosis was established via frozen section in the operating room and was later confirmed by permanent histological examination. A board-certified pathologist reviewed each sample to confirm the viability (>80% by nuclei counts of hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections) and tumor content (>90%) of each sample. Planned analyses were performed on each specimen as sample size allowed.
Cell cultures
In brief, freshly obtained GCT tissues were chopped up in Dulbecco's minimum essential medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin. The resultant cell suspension together with small pieces of tissues was transferred to culture flasks and cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air. Half of the culture medium was changed every 2–3 days. Upon reaching confluence, primary cultures were then subcultured. GCTSCs in cultures obtained after the 9th passage (Fig. 1) were studied.
3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay of cell proliferation
GCTSCs (1×105 cells/well) were plated and cultured in 96-well plates with rhBMP-2 (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) at concentrations of 0, 10, 100 and 300 ng/ml in DMEM containing 10% FBS for 1, 3, 5 or 7 days. MTT (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to the culture medium according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the culture was continued for another 4 h. Dimethylsulfoxide (100 µl/well) was added to each well to dissolve the formazan crystals. The optical density of the resulting product was measured at 490 nm using a microplate reader (Multiskan GO; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
Flow cytometric analysis
Cell cycle conditions were determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis using propidium iodide (PI) staining. GCTSCs in the logarithmic phase of growth were incubated in the presence or absence of rhBMP-2 (10 ng/ml) in 10% FBS DMEM for 48 h. The cells were then harvested and washed in cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4). The cell pellets were fixed in 70% cold alcohol for >24 h at 4°C, then washed in cold PBS and stained with PI solution at 4°C in the dark for 30 min. Apoptosis induced by rhBMP-2 in GCTSCs was determined by flow cytometry using the Guava Nexin Reagent kit (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, treated or untreated cells were collected, washed in cold PBS and centrifuged at 200 × g for 5 min. The cell pellets were resuspended in 100 ml DMEM supplemented with 1% FBS, and then incubated with 100 ml Annexin V-PE and 7-aminoactinomycin D labeling solution for 20 min at room temperature. Cells were finally analyzed with a Guava EasyCyte 5HT flow cytometer (EMD Millipore). The data were analyzed using Guava Nexin Software, version 2.2.2 (EMD Millipore).
Western blot analysis
Cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a density of 1×106 cells/well. After being allowed to adhere overnight, the cultures were cultured in the presence or absence of rhBMP-2 (10 ng/ml) in 10% FBS DMEM for 72 h. After the treatment period, cells were washed with PBS and then resuspended in lysis buffer [1% NP-40, 1 mmol/l phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 40 mmol/l Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mmol/l NaCl, 100 mmol/l Na3VO4, 1 mmol/l NaF] at 4°C for 15 min. Protein concentrations were determined by means of a Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA, USA). The proteins were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (EMD Millipore). After blocking with 5% non-fat dry milk, each blot was probed with a primary antibody (1:1,000) directed against ERK1/2 (rabbit monoclonal; cat. no. 4695), p38 MAPK (rabbit monoclonal; cat. no. 8690), JNK (rabbit monoclonal; cat. no. 9252), phospho-Erk1/2 (rabbit monoclonal; cat. no. 4094), phospho-p38 MAPK (rabbit monoclonal; cat. no. 4511) or phospho-JNK (mouse monoclonal; cat. no. 9255) (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) at 4°C overnight. Subsequently, the membranes were washed three times (5 min/wash) with Tris-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween-20 (TBST). The membranes were then incubated for 30 min at room temperature with a peroxidase-conjugated AffiniPure goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1:3,000; cat. no. 111-035-003; Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA, USA). The membranes were washed a further three times with TBST and incubated with Super Signal Enhanced Chemiluminescence substrate (Detection Reagents 1 and 2 at a 1:1 ratio; Pierce Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL, USA) for 1 min at 25°C. After removing the excess mixture, the blots were wrapped in a clean piece of plastic wrap, ensuring no bubbles were present between the blot and wrap. The blots were then exposed for 30–300 sec to X-ray film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA). Band intensities were quantified using Quantity One software (v. 4.4.0; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) by two observers who were blind to the experimental groups.
Statistical analysis
The results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. The statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 19.0 (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA) statistical software. The photometric values obtained in MTT assays were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance, with post-hoc multiple comparisons made between groups using a least significant difference test. The comparisons between cell cycle alterations, cell apoptosis, and the expression of Erk1/2, p38 and JNK in the rhBMP2 (10 ng/ml) and control groups were conducted using independent sample t-tests. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
MTT assay
As shown in Fig. 2, growth of the GCTSCs was significantly inhibited by the addition of 10 or 100 ng/ml rhBMP-2 (P<0.01) or 300 ng/ml rhBMP-2 (P<0.05) for 5 days compared with the control. The growth of GCTSCs was significantly inhibited compared with the control when treated with all three concentrations of rhBMP-2 for 7 days (P<0.001), whereas no growth inhibition of GCTSCs compared with the control was observed following the addition of 10, 100 or 300 ng/ml rhBMP-2 for 1 or 3 days. Treatment of GCTSCs with 100 or 300 ng/ml rhBMP-2 for 1 day induced a slight stimulation of cell growth, but not significantly.
Effects of rhBMP-2 on GCTSC apoptosis and cell cycle distribution
To determine whether BMP-2 affected the cell cycle distribution of GCTSCs, the GCTSCs were incubated with rhBMP-2 (10 ng/ml) for 48 h and analyzed using flow cytometry (Fig. 3). The cell cycle kinetics demonstrated that there was no significant difference between the control and rhBMP-2 (10 ng/ml) treatment groups in the percentage of cells in the G0/G1, S and G2/M phases. The inhibition of apoptosis is a critical factor for tumor progression. Therefore, Annexin V-PE/PI staining was evaluated by flow cytometry. Following culture of the GCTSCs with rhBMP-2 (10 ng/ml) for 48 h, the percentage of apoptotic cells was very similar to that in the untreated control group, indicating that rhBMP-2 did not change the incidence of apoptosis over the 48-h treatment period. However, the percentage of necrotic cells markedly increased in the BMP-2 group compared with the control group (*P<0.05; Fig. 4A). Notably, after 72 h of rhBMP-2 treatment, the percentage of apoptotic and necrotic cells was significantly increased in the BMP-2 group compared with the control group (**P<0.01; Fig. 4B). Indeed, these data indicate that rhBMP-2 increased the susceptibility of GCTSCs to apoptosis, which corresponds with the results of the MTT assay.
Western blot analysis
To clarify the mechanisms underlying the effects of BMP-2 on GCTSCs, the expression of non-Smad MAPK pathway-associated proteins, including p38, JNK and ERK1/2 were examined. As shown in Fig. 5, following the addition of rhBMP-2 (10 ng/ml) to GCTSCs for 72 h, the levels of p38, JNK and ERK1/2 detected in exponentially growing GCTSCs were similar to those in the control group, but the expression levels of phospho-p38, phospho-ERK1/2 and phospho-JNK were significantly increased in the rhBMP-2-treated GCTSCs compared with those in the control group.
Discussion
GCT is a common benign tumor of bone in adults. The use of bone cement with or without phenol or other toxic substances has been widely used as effective adjuvant therapy following the surgical curettage of GCT (3,5,6,25–28). rhBMP-2 is an osteoinductive growth factor that can promote bone formation, and is widely used in fracture nonunions and spine fusion for the treatment of degenerative spinal disorders. Numerous previous studies have shown that rhBMP-2 has a dual role in tumor biology: it functions as a tumor promoter or a tumor suppressor, depending on the type of cell or tissue, the BMP-2 dosage and the presence of other factors that are not yet defined in the microenvironment (10,13–17,29,30). This behavior suggests that in different types of tumor, it acts on a type of cellular homeostatic mechanism through as yet unknown regulatory signaling pathways, such as non-Smad pathways (19–22). For these reasons, surgeons may hesitate to use BMP-2 on their patients for fracture healing or spine fusion. Therefore, further preclinical studies are required to evaluate the effect of BMP-2 on the growth of GCTs to guide its use in patients.
The data from the present study provide the first evidence that BMP-2 has a significant inhibitory effect on tumorigenic GCTSC proliferation at lower concentrations (10 and 100 ng/ml) of rhBMP-2, as compared with a higher concentration (300 ng/ml), for 5 days in vitro. Following treatment for 7 days, the different concentrations of rhBMP-2 exerted similar inhibitory effects on tumorigenic GCTSC proliferation compared with that in the control group. This result is consistent with previous studies that have shown an inhibitory effect of BMP-2 on cancer cell growth, including prostate, breast, myeloma, gastric and colon cancers (13,14,16,17,31–34). However, the present study confirmed in vitro that rhBMP-2 inhibits GCTSC proliferation in a non-dose- and time-dependent manner. In contrast with previous studies which indicated through flow cytometric analysis that the inhibitory effect of BMP-2 on cell growth was due to G1 phase arrest (13,14), the present study showed that there was no difference in the percentage of cells in each phase of the cell cycle between the untreated GCTSCs and those treated with rhBMP-2 for 48 h.
Therefore, the present study confirmed that BMP-2 inhibits cell growth in vitro by inducing apoptosis in GCTSCs. The observed increase in cell apoptosis may be associated with the upregulation of phospho-p38, phospho-ERK1/2 and phospho-JNK, and the stimulation of MAPK signaling pathways.
In conclusion, BMP-2 inhibited GCTSC proliferation through the induction of apoptosis. The results demonstrate that rhBMP-2 is suitable for use as an antineoplastic therapeutic agent for the treatment of GCT.
Acknowledgements
This study was sponsored by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81172012) and Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (grant no. S2011010001062).
References
Mendenhall WM, Zlotecki RA, Scarborough MT, Gibbs CP and Mendenhall NP: Giant cell tumor of bone. Am J Clin Oncol. 29:96–99. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gamberi G, Serra M, Ragazzini P, Magagnoli G, Pazzaglia L, Ponticelli F, Ferrari C, Zanasi M, Bertoni F, Picci P and Benassi MS: Identification of markers of possible prognostic value in 57 giant cell tumors of bone. Oncol Rep. 10:351–356. 2003.PubMed/NCBI | |
Trieb K, Bitzan P, Lang S, Dominkus M and Kotz R: Recurrence of curetted and bone-grafted giant-cell tumours with and without adjuvant phenol therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 27:200–202. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Campanacci M, Baldini N, Boriani S and Sudanese A: Giant-cell tumor of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 69:106–114. 1987.PubMed/NCBI | |
Tse LF, Wong KC, Kumta SM, Huang L, Chow TC and Griffith JF: Bisphosphonates reduce local recurrence in extremity giant cell tumor of bone: A case-control study. Bone. 42:68–73. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gibbs CP, Lewis VO and Peabody T: Beyond bone grafting: Techniques in the surgical management of benign bone tumors. Instr Course Lect. 54:497–503. 2005.PubMed/NCBI | |
Zheng MH, Robbins P, Xu J, Huang L, Wood DJ and Papadimitriou JM: The histogenesis of giant cell tumour of bone: A model of interaction between neoplastic cells and osteoclasts. Histol Histopathol. 16:297–307. 2001.PubMed/NCBI | |
Hopkins DR, Keles S and Greenspan DS: The bone morphogenetic protein 1/Tolloid-like metalloproteinases. Matrix Biol. 26:508–523. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Senta H, Park H, Bergeron E, Drevelle O, Fong D, Leblanc E, Cabana F, Roux S, Grenier G and Faucheux N: Cell responses to bone morphogenetic proteins and peptides derived from them: Biomedical applications and limitations. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 20:213–222. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Singh A and Morris RJ: The Yin and Yang of bone morphogenetic proteins in cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 21:299–313. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Barboza E, Caúla A and Machado F: Potential of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in bone regeneration. Implant Dent. 8:360–367. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hogan BL: Bone morphogenetic proteins: Multifunctional regulators of vertebrate development. Genes Dev. 10:1580–1594. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen A, Wang D, Liu X, He S, Yu Z and Wang J: Inhibitory effect of BMP-2 on the proliferation of breast cancer cells. Mol Med Rep. 6:615–620. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ye S, Park BH, Song KJ, Kim JR, Jang KY, Park HS, Bae JS, Brochmann EJ, Wang JC, Murray SS and Lee KB: In vivo inhibition of bone morphogenetic protein-2 on breast cancer cell growth. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 38:E143–E150. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Langenfeld EM, Kong Y and Langenfeld J: Bone morphogenetic protein 2 stimulation of tumor growth involves the activation of Smad-1/5. Oncogene. 25:685–692. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kokorina NA, Lewis JS Jr, Zakharkin SO, Krebsbach PH and Nussenbaum B: rhBMP-2 has adverse effects on human oral carcinoma cell lines in vivo. Laryngoscope. 122:95–102. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Molina CA, Sarabia-Estrada R, Gokaslan ZL, Witham TF, Bydon A, Wolinsky JP and Sciubba DM: Delayed onset of paralysis and slowed tumor growth following in situ placement of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 within spine tumors in a rat model of metastatic breast cancer. J Neurosurg Spine. 16:365–372. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Haÿ E, Lemonnier J, Fromigué O, Guénou H and Marie PJ: Bone morphogenetic protein receptor IB signaling mediates apoptosis independently of differentiation in osteoblastic cells. J Biol Chem. 279:1650–1658. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kimura N, Matsuo R, Shibuya H, Nakashima K and Taga T: BMP2-induced apoptosis is mediated by activation of the TAK1-p38 kinase pathway that is negatively regulated by Smad6. J Biol Chem. 275:17647–17652. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee KS, Hong SH and Bae SC: Both the Smad and p38 MAPK pathways play a crucial role in Runx2 expression following induction by transforming growth factor-beta and bone morphogenetic protein. Oncogene. 21:7156–7163. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Moustakas A and Heldin CH: Non-Smad TGF-beta signals. J Cell Sci. 118:3573–3584. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Guicheux J, Lemonnier J, Ghayor C, Suzuki A, Palmer G and Caverzasio J: Activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and c-Jun-NH2-terminal kinase by BMP-2 and their implication in the stimulation of osteoblastic cell differentiation. J Bone Miner Res. 18:2060–2068. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang L, Teng XY, Cheng YY, Lee KM and Kumta SM: Expression of preosteoblast markers and Cbfa-1 and Osterix gene transcripts in stromal tumour cells of giant cell tumour of bone. Bone. 34:393–401. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kudo N, Ogose A, Ariizumi T, Kawashima H, Hotta T, Hatano H, Morita T, Nagata M, Siki Y, Kawai A, et al: Expression of bone morphogenetic proteins in giant cell tumor of bone. Anticancer Res. 29:2219–2225. 2009.PubMed/NCBI | |
Su YP, Chen WM and Chen TH: Giant-cell tumors of bone: An analysis of 87 cases. Int Orthop. 28:239–243. 2004.PubMed/NCBI | |
Saiz P, Virkus W, Piasecki P, Templeton A, Shott S and Gitelis S: Results of giant cell tumor of bone treated with intralesional excision. Clin Orthop Related Res. 424:221–226. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ward WG Sr and Li G: Customized treatment algorithm for giant cell tumor of bone: Report of a series. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 397:259–270. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Turcotte RE, Wunder JS, Isler MH, Schachar N, Masri BA, Moreau G and Davis AM: Canadian Sarcoma Group: Giant cell tumor of bone. Giant cell tumor of long bone: A Canadian sarcoma group study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 397:248–258. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kleeff J, Maruyama H, Ishiwata T, Sawhney H, Friess H, Büchler MW and Korc M: Bone morphogenetic protein 2 exerts diverse effects on cell growth in vitro and is expressed in human pancreatic cancer in vivo. Gastroenterology. 116:1202–1216. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ide H, Yoshida T, Matsumoto N, Aoki K, Osada Y, Sugimura T and Terada M: Growth regulation of human prostate cancer cells by bone morphogenetic protein-2. Cancer Res. 57:5022–5027. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Beck SE, Jung BH, Fiorino A, Gomez J, Rosario ED, Cabrera BL, Huang SC, Chow JY and Carethers JM: Bone morphogenetic protein signaling and growth suppression in colon cancer. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 291:G135–G145. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wen XZ, Miyake S, Akiyama Y and Yuasa Y: BMP-2 modulates the proliferation and differentiation of normal and cancerous gastric cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 316:100–106. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brubaker KD, Corey E, Brown LG and Vessella RL: Bone morphogenetic protein signaling in prostate cancer cell lines. J Cell Biochem. 91:151–160. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pouliot F, Blais A and Labrie C: Overexpression of a dominant negative type II bone morphogenetic protein receptor inhibits the growth of human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 63:277–281. 2003.PubMed/NCBI |