Anti‑inflammatory potential of total saponins derived from the roots of Panax ginseng in lipopolysaccharide‑activated RAW 264.7 macrophages

  • Authors:
    • Kyung‑Jun Jang
    • Sang Hoon Choi
    • Gyeong Jin Yu
    • Su Hyun Hong
    • Yoon Ho Chung
    • Cheol‑Hong Kim
    • Hyun‑Min Yoon
    • Gi‑Young Kim
    • Byung Woo Kim
    • Yung Hyun Choi
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: December 29, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2965
  • Pages: 1109-1115
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Ginseng, the root of Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer (Araliaceae), is a widely known traditional medicine that has been utilized throughout Asia for several thousand years. Ginseng saponins exert various important pharmacological effects regarding the control of a number of diseases. The aim of the present study was to identify the anti‑inflammatory effects of total saponins extracted from ginseng (TSG) on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‑stimulated mouse RAW 264.7 macrophages. The inhibitory effects of TSG on LPS‑induced nitric oxide (NO) production and LPS‑induced tumor necrosis factor‑α (TNF‑α) and interleukin‑1β (IL‑1β) protein expression were determined by measuring the levels of nitrite and enzyme‑linked immunosorbent assays, respectively. Furthermore, the effects of TSG on the mRNA expression levels and localizations of inducible NO synthase (iNOS), IL‑1β and TNF‑α, and their upstream signaling proteins, including nuclear factor‑κB (NF‑κB) and mitogen‑activated protein kinases (MAPKs), were investigated by reverse transcription‑polymerase chain reaction and western blotting, respectively. Following stimulation with LPS, elevated levels of NO production were detected in RAW 264.7 cells; however, TSG pretreatment significantly inhibited the production of NO (P<0.05), by suppressing the expression of iNOS. In addition, LPS‑stimulated TNF‑α and IL‑1β production was significantly reduced by TSG (P<0.05). In the LPS‑stimulated RAW 264.7 cells, NF‑κB was translocated from the cytosol to the nucleus, whilst TSG pretreatment induced the sequestration of NF‑κB in the cytosol by inhibiting inhibitor of κB degradation. TSG also contributed to downregulation of MAPKs in LPS‑stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. These results suggested that TSG may exert anti‑inflammatory activity, and that TSG may be considered a potential therapeutic for the treatment of inflammatory diseases associated with macrophage activation.

Introduction

Inflammation is of importance in the highly complex immune response mounted to defend against harmful stimuli, including pathogens, damaged cells or irritants. Macrophages, as critical participants in the inflammatory process, directly counteract the aforementioned stimuli (1,2). Under inflammatory conditions, enzymes, cytokines and chemokines, in addition to signaling proteins at the site of the infected tissues and cells, are secreted by macrophages, causing inflammatory cells to migrate to sites of inflammation in order to resolve the abnormal conditions (1,2). The model most commonly used to investigate induced inflammation is the stimulation of macrophages by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) obtained from gram-negative bacteria (1). The binding of LPS to its cognate receptors, including Toll-like receptors on the mammalian cell surface, activates several signaling cascades that drive the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators and cytokines, including nitric oxide (NO), prostaglandin E2, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin (IL)-1β (2,3).

Additionally, excessive inflammatory responses may result in decreased expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines (1,2,4,5). The pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, which are characterized by chronic inflammation, may be influenced by pro- and anti-inflammatory factors, as well as dysregulation of inflammatory immune responses (5,6). Therefore, the utilization of different therapeutic strategies may be therapeutically beneficial for the treatment of inflammatory diseases; for example, bioactive agents could be used to inhibit the production of inflammatory factors by macrophages (46).

Subsequent to stimulation with LPS, nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) is activated as a result of the activation of the inhibitor of κB (IκB)-kinase complex inhibitor (7,8). Inhibitor of IκB phosphorylates IκB, causing IκB proteasomal degradation and the release of NF-κB (7,8). The liberated dimeric NF-κB then translocates to the nucleus and activates the transcription of pro-inflammatory target genes that encode regulatory proteins. This leads to physiological responses, including inflammatory or immune responses (7,8). Downstream targets of the LPS-induced inflammatory cascades in macrophages are members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family, including extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 MAPK (2,3,7). When macrophages are stimulated with LPS, MAPKs are activated to produce inflammatory factors through the activation of multiple downstream signaling events (9,10). Therefore, targeting the NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways is considered an attractive therapeutic strategy for the development of anti-inflammatory therapeutic agents.

Ginseng, the root of Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer (Araliaceae), is a herbal medicine that has been shown to exhibit a variety of therapeutic effects, including neuroprotective, immunomodulating, anti-cancer and antioxidant activities (9). As part of traditional folk medicine, ginseng has been a popular plant-based medicine for 2,000 years in East Asian countries, and remains a popular natural medicine worldwide (1113). The major active constituents of ginseng are the triterpenoid saponins, also known as total saponins extracted from ginseng (TSG), which have a four-ring, steroid-like structure with attached sugar moieties (1416). TSG are the primary molecules responsible for the effects of ginseng. They possess pharmacological properties, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and anti-cancer effects (1113). In addition, Kim et al (17) suggested that TSG may suppress NO production in LPS/interferon-γ-activated RAW 246.7 macrophages by inhibiting inducible NO synthase (iNOS) expression. Furthermore, TSG has been found to inhibit LPS-induced expression of iNOS, matrix metalloproteinase-9 and pro-inflammatory cytokines in BV2 microglial cells, which is associated with the inactivation of NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways (18). A recent study also demonstrated that TSG-associated recovery from LPS-induced depression-like behavior was associated with decreased production of various pro-inflammatory cytokines in LPS-challenged mice and RAW 264.7 cells (19). However, the anti-inflammatory mechanisms in macrophages have yet to be elucidated.

Therefore, in the present study, the anti-inflammatory effects of TSG were evaluated using an LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophage cell model. It was identified that TSG exerted curative effects on anti-inflammatory activity by reducing iNOS production, and TNF-α and IL-1β expression. The effects of TSG on the NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways were also investigated in the current study in order to elucidate the associated inhibitory mechanism. The results provide evidence in favor of the use of TSG as a potential anti-inflammatory supplement.

Materials and methods

Preparation of TSG

For the preparation of TSG, air-dried ginseng roots were purchased from Dongeui University Hospital of Oriental Medicine (Busan, Korea). TSG was separated and purified as described by Sugimoto et al (20). Briefly, samples were extracted twice with methanol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) by refluxing at 80°C for 2 h. The methanol extract was then suspended in water and partitioned sequentially with n-hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate and n-butanol. Subsequently, the water-saturated n-butanol fraction was evaporated to dryness in a vacuum. The recovered crude saponins were loaded onto Diaion® HP-20/MCI GEL® CHP20P (Sigma-Aldrich), and the sugar residues were removed with 40% methanol. The fractions were eluted with 60–80% methanol, collected, and dried to obtain TSG. TSG was then diluted in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham) MA, USA) to 0, 50, 100, 200 and 400 µg/ml, prior to use.

Cell culture

Mouse RAW 264.7 macrophages were purchased from the American Tissue Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). RAW 264.7 cells (5×105 cells/ml) were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% (v/v) penicillin (100 U/ml)/streptomycin (100 µg/ml) under humidified conditions (5% CO2 at 37°C). In all experiments, the cells were treated with various concentrations of TSG (0, 50, 100, 200 or 400 µg/ml) for 1 h prior to exposure with 100 ng/ml LPS (Lipopolysaccharides from Escherichia coli 026:B6; Sigma-Aldrich) for 24 h under humidified conditions (5% CO2 at 37°C).

3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay

Cell viability was measured based on the formation of blue formazan, which is metabolized from colorless MTT (Sigma-Aldrich) by mitochondrial dehydrogenases, enzymes that are only active in live cells (18). RAW 264.7 cells (5×105 cells/ml) were seeded in a 96-well plate. The cells were pretreated with various concentrations of TSG for 1 h and then stimulated by 100 ng/ml LPS for 24 h. Following incubation with TSG and LPS, the cultured media was replaced with fresh media and the cells were incubated with 0.5 mg/ml MTT solution for 3 h. The supernatant was then discarded and the formazan blue, which was formed in the cells, was dissolved with dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich). The optical density was measured at 540 nm with an ELISA plate reader (MRX; Dynatech Laboratories, Chantilly, VA, USA). Cell viability was calculated as the percentage of surviving cells over control cells (no TSG added).

Measurement of NO production

Concentrations of NO in the culture supernatants were determined by measuring the levels of nitrite, which is a major stable product of NO, using Griess reagent (Sigma-Aldrich). RAW 264.7 cells (5×105 cells/ml) were seeded in each well of a 96-well plate. The cells were pretreated with the indicated concentrations of TSG for 1 h and stimulated with 100 ng/ml LPS. Following an incubation period of 24 h, the supernatant from each well was collected by centrifugation at 3,000 × g using the Smart R17 Refrigerated Micro Centrifuge (Hanil BioMed, Inc., Gwangju, Korea) for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatant was mixed with the same volume of Griess reagent for 10 min at room temperature in the dark. Nitrite levels were determined using an ELISA plate reader (MRX; Dynatech Laboratories) at 540 nm, and nitrite concentrations were calculated by referencing a standard curve generated by known concentrations of sodium nitrite (17).

Measurement of TNF-α and IL-1β production

To measure the inhibitory efficacy of TSG on the production of TNF-α and IL-1β, TNF-α and IL-1β ELISA kits (cat nos. MTA00B and MLB00C, respectively) were purchased from R&D Systems, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN, USA). The cell culture conditions were the same as for the nitrite measurement assay. After incubation with TSG and LPS for 24 h, the TNF-α and IL-1β concentrations in cultured media were determined by a selective ELISA kit, according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

The cells were incubated with TSG (400 µg/ml) alone for 24 h, or pretreated with the various concentrations of TSG for 1 h prior to LPS stimulation (100 ng/ml) for 24 h. Total RNA was isolated from cultured cells using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Contaminating DNA was removed by treating the RNA samples with recombinant DNase I (DNA-free™ kit; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) The isolated RNA (1 µg) was used for cDNA synthesis using AccuPower® RT PreMix (Bioneer Corporation, Daejeon, Korea) containing Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase. iNOS, IL-1β and TNF-α genes were amplified from the cDNA by PCR (5331 MasterCycler Gradient; Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The PCR primers were as follows: iNOS forward, 5′-ATGTCCGAAGCAAACATCAC-3′ and reverse, 5′-TAATGTCCAGGAAGTAGGTG-3′; IL-1β forward, 5′-GGGCTGCTTCCAAACCTTTG-3′ and reverse, 5′-GCTTGGGATCCACACTCTCC-3′; TNF-α forward, 5′-TCTCATCAGTTCTATGGCCC-3′ and reverse, 5′-GGGAGTAGACAAGGTACAAC-3′; and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) forward, 5′-AGGCCGGTGCTGAGTATGTC-3′ and reverse, 5′-TGCCTGCTTCACCACCTTCT-3′ (Bioneer Corporation). The PCR reaction was initiated at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 31 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 30 sec annealing temperature, 72°C for 30 sec, and a final extension step at 72°C for 5 min. The annealing temperatures were 63°C for iNOS, IL-1β and TNF-α, and 61°C for GAPDH. Following amplification, the PCR products were separated by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis, stained with ethidium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich) and visualized by ultraviolet illumination.

Protein extraction and western blot analysis

For total protein extraction, the cells were lysed by incubating with a lysis buffer [25 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 250 mM NaCl, 5 mM ethylene diaminetetra acetic acid, 1% NP-40, 1 mM pheny-methylsulfonyl fluoride and 5 mM dithiothreitol; Sigma-Aldrich] for 1 h at 4°C. Insoluble materials were discarded by centrifugation at 13,000 × g using the Smart R17 Refrigerated Micro Centrifuge (Hanil BioMed, Inc.) for 20 min at 4°C. In a parallel experiment, nuclear and cytosolic proteins were separated using nuclear extraction reagents (product no. 78833; Pierce Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL, USA), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The protein concentration in the cell lysate was determined using a DC™ Protein Assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). Equal quantities of protein were then separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis at 90 V for 2 h. Separated protein was transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher and Schuell, Keene, NH, USA) and subsequently blocked with Tris-buffered saline (10 mM of Tris-Cl, pH 7.4) containing 0.5% Tween-20 (TBST) and 5% nonfat dried milk for 1 h at room temperature. Subsequently, the membranes were probed with rabbit anti-iNOS (1:1,000; sc-509), −IL-1β (1:1,000; sc-7884), −p65 (1:500; sc-109), −IκB-α (1:500; sc-847), −ERK (1:1,000; sc-154) and −p38 (1:1,000; sc-535), and goat anti-lamin B (1:1,000; sc-6216) and −actin (1:1,000; sc-1615) polyclonal antibodies, from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Dallas, TX, USA), and rabbit anti-TNF-α (1:1,000; #3707), −JNK (1:1,000; #9252S) and phosphorylated (p)-38 (1:500; #9211S) polyclonal antibodies, and mouse anti-p-JNK (1:500; #9255) and −p-ERK (1:500; #9106S) monoclonal antibodies, from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Danvers, MA, USA), overnight at 4°C. After 2 h blocking with 5% non-fat milk in TBST (1.5 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris-Cl, 0.05% Tween-20, pH 7.4), the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies (1:1,000; RPN4301; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Chalfont, UK) at room temperature for 2 h. Using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (GE Healthcare Life Sciences), immunoreactive bands were detected and exposed to X-ray film.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Differences in mean values between groups were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's-test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

TSG inhibits LPS-induced NO production in RAW 264.7 macrophages

To evaluate the anti-inflammatory activity of TSG, the effect of TSG on NO production stimulated by LPS was initially investigated in RAW 264.7 cells. Following pretreatment with various concentrations of TSG for 1 h, RAW 264.7 cells were stimulated with LPS for 24 h. Cell culture media were collected and NO levels were quantified using the Griess test. The addition of LPS to RAW 264.7 cells resulted in an increase in NO production levels (Fig. 1). However, TSG was observed to significantly suppress LPS-induced NO production in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 1; P<0.05).

TSG downregulates LPS-induced iNOS expression in RAW 264.7 macrophages

Following the observation that NO production was inhibited by TSG, RT-PCR and western blot analysis were performed to determine whether the inhibition of NO production by TSG in the LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells was associated with decreased levels of iNOS mRNA and protein, as iNOS produces NO as a key mediator of inflammation. In response to LPS treatment, mRNA expression of iNOS was induced; however, pretreatment with TSG inhibited this upregulation at a dose of 400 µg/ml (Fig. 2A). Similarly, pretreatment with TSG markedly suppressed the protein expression levels of iNOS in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 2B). The results indicate that TSG can downregulate NO production in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells via inhibition of iNOS expression at the transcriptional level.

Effects of TSG on the viability of RAW 264.7 macrophages

In order to exclude the possibility that the inhibition of NO production was due to cytotoxicity caused by TSG treatment, MTT assays were performed in RAW 264.7 cells treated with TSG for 24 h in the presence or absence of LPS (100 ng/ml). As demonstrated in Fig. 3, at the same concentrations of TSG (50–400 µg/ml) used to inhibit NO and its production, TSG alone did not affect cell viability. Furthermore, co-treatment with TSG and LPS also did not demonstrate any cytotoxic effects. Thus, the results indicate that the inhibition of NO production in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells was not a result of the cytotoxic effects of TSG.

TSG reduces the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages

The effects of TSG on pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-1β, were analyzed using ELISA. As demonstrated in Fig. 4A and B, when RAW 264.7 cells were treated with TSG alone, there were no significant changes in the production levels of TNF-α or IL-1β, respectively (P>0.05). However, production of the two cytokines were increased in the culture media of LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages, and these increases were significantly reduced by treatment with TSG in a concentration-dependent manner (P<0.05; Fig. 4).

TSG downregulates LPS-induced TNF-α and IL-1β mRNA and protein expression in RAW 264.7 macrophages

In a parallel experiment, RT-PCR and western blot analyses were performed to determine whether TSG was able to inhibit the expression of TNF-α and IL-1β cytokines at the transcriptional or translational levels. As indicated in Fig. 5, treating RAW 264.7 macrophages with different concentrations of TSG prior to LPS treatment resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in the mRNA (Fig. 5A) and protein (Fig. 5B) levels of the two cytokines. Thus, the results indicate that TSG also inhibits the expression of these genes at the transcriptional level.

TSG blocks LPS-induced NF-κB activity in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages

NF-κB is an important transcription factor that is required for the activation of pro-inflammatory mediators and cytokines in LPS-stimulated macrophages. Under normal conditions, NF-κB is localized to the cytosol due to its binding with IκB. However, when cells are stimulated by LPS, IκB protein is rapidly phosphorylated by IκB kinase and degraded, and the NF-κB is translocated into the nucleus (7). Therefore, to determine whether TSG prevents the translocation of NF-κB from the cytosol to the nucleus, western blot analysis was performed using the nuclear and cytosolic fractions of RAW 264.7 cells. Fig. 6A demonstrates that the protein expression level of the nuclear p65 subunit of NF-κB was markedly increased following exposure to LPS alone, indicating that LPS induced the translocation of NF-κB p65 from the cytosol to the nucleus. However, the LPS-induced accumulation of NF-κB p65 in the nuclear fractions was reduced by TSG pretreatment in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 6A). In addition, IκB-α exhibited minor degradation following exposure to LPS; however, TSG blocked the LPS-induced degradation of IκB-α in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6B). These findings indicate that TSG inhibits NF-κB activation in RAW 264.7 cells through the suppression of IκB degradation and the nuclear translocation of NF-κB.

TSG reduces LPS-induced activation of MAPKs in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages

As the MAPK signaling pathway is known to be important for the expression of pro-inflammatory genes, MAPKs act as specific targets for inflammatory responses (9,10). To examine whether inhibition of the LPS-induced inflammatory action by TSG is mediated through MAPK signaling pathways, the effects of TSG on the activation of MAPKs, including p38 MAPK, ERK and JNK, were investigated in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. As indicated in Fig. 7, phosphorylation of p38 MAPK, ERK and JNK were induced by stimulation with LPS, whereas TSG attenuated the LPS-induced phosphorylation of these kinases in a dose-dependent manner. However, the total protein expression levels of the unphosphorylated MAPKs were unaffected by LPS and TSG treatment. These results suggest that TSG may block the LPS-induced expression of pro-inflammatory responses by inhibiting the MAPK signaling pathway.

Discussion

The inflammatory process is typically highly regulated, consisting of signals that initiate and maintain inflammation, and signals that inhibit the process (4,5). Due to the importance of activated macrophages in the initiation and amplification of a variety of inflammatory diseases, therapeutic methods to reduce the number of activated macrophages, inhibit their activation signals and/or specific macrophage receptors, or to selectively counteract macrophage products, are under investigation for controlling inflammatory diseases (1). In a previous study, it was demonstrated that TSG was able to exert anti-inflammatory effects in LPS-activated RAW 264.7 macrophages (19). While this is in agreement with the results of the present study, the molecular mechanisms have not been well characterized. The current study also demonstrated that the anti-inflammatory properties of TSG may be associated with a reduction in the activation levels of NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways.

NO is a highly reactive oxidant that is produced through the action of iNOS, and participates in diverse biological mechanisms as a potent pro-inflammatory mediator (21,22). iNOS is present at low levels under normal physiological conditions, however, it is rapidly induced by pro-inflammatory and mitogenic stimuli, including LPS (2,18). Numerous studies have revealed that excessive NO production is important in the pathogenesis of inflammation and can lead to tissue damage by reacting with reactive oxygen species (23,24). Several inhibitors of NO induction have been reported to exert anti-inflammatory effects by preventing iNOS expression (17,18,22). In the present study, TSG was found to significantly reduce the production of NO in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages by inhibiting mRNA and protein levels of iNOS, suggesting that the specific inhibition of the iNOS gene may be responsible for the anti-inflammatory capacity of TSG. An MTT assay confirmed that the inhibitory effects of TSG were not a result of cytotoxicity.

Inflammatory disorders are characterized, among other events, by the production of significant quantities of free radicals, nitrogen reactive species and cytokines (7,21,2325). TNF-α and IL-1β are considered to be critical cytokines in the inflammatory cytokine network, and are produced as a result of endotoxin exposure (25). Furthermore, TNF-α and IL-1β are important for promoting the expression of iNOS, in addition to the production of other cytokines, such as IL-6 and IL-8 (21,25). Therefore, suppressing the overproduction and activity of pro-inflammatory cytokines is necessary to reduce inflammation and its symptoms, and this method has proved to be successful in the treatment of certain inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, obesity, diabetes mellitus, cancer and atherosclerosis (2,5,21,23). In the present study, it was demonstrated that TSG is able to significantly suppress TNF-α and IL-1β production. mRNA and protein expression levels of these cytokines were also significantly inhibited, suggesting that TSG exerts its anti-inflammatory effects by suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokines at the transcriptional level.

As NF-κB and MAPK signaling molecules are key regulators of a variety of genes involved in inflammatory responses (8,25), the effects of TSG on the NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways were investigated in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 macrophages, in order to further elucidate the underlying mechanisms of anti-inflammation. Under normal physiological conditions, NF-κB is localizes in the cytosol as an inactive heterodimer consisting of three subunits: p50, p65 and Iκ-B. Upon its activation by various stimuli, including LPS, the Iκ-B protein is phosphorylated and degraded, resulting in the liberation of NF-κB and enabling it to translocate to the nucleus (8,25). The translocation of NF-κB into the nucleus triggers the expression of target genes, including pro-inflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecules, chemokines and inducible enzymes, such as iNOS (26,27). The production of the aforementioned genes acts as a positive autocrine feedback signal to augment NF-κB activation, and subsequently increases the production of these pro-inflammatory factors (7,8,28). The results of the present study demonstrated that the translocation of the p65 subunit of NF-κB to the nucleus, in addition to the degradation of IκB-α, was markedly inhibited by pretreatment with TSG. Thus, the data indicated that TSG may exert its anti-inflammatory activity through NF-κB activation; by suppressing the degradation of IκB-α and the subsequent translocation of NF-κB p65 from the cytosol to the nucleus in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. The present data provided a basis for modeling the effects of TSG in animal models, in order to facilitate the development of nutraceutical products and anti-inflammatory drugs based on TSG.

The MAPK family is a group of serine and threonine kinases that are activated in response to diverse extracellular stimuli to mediate signal transduction from the cell surface to the nucleus (29). Upon the activation of MAPKs, transcription factors that are present in the cytoplasm or nucleus are phosphorylated and activated. This activation leads to the expression of target genes that regulate cell growth, division, and/or differentiation (30,31). As described previously, in the LPS-stimulated signaling pathway of macrophages, MAPKs have demonstrated an association with LPS-stimulated iNOS and pro-inflammatory cytokine expressions (9,10). In the present study, it was identified that the phosphorylation levels of three MAPKs, ERK, JNK and p38 MAPK, were markedly increased in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells, compared with unstimulated cells; however, following TSG administration, the phosphorylation levels of the MAPKs markedly reduced in a dose-dependent manner. Therefore, it is postulated that attenuation of the phosphorylation levels of MAPKs by TSG may contribute to the inhibition of inflammatory reactions in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells.

In conclusion, TSG has the ability to inhibit the production of inflammatory cytokines, in addition to NO, in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages, by modulating the activation of intracellular signaling pathways, including NF-κB and multiple MAPK signaling pathways. Thus, TSG may be a potential candidate for the treatment of various inflammatory diseases that are associated with the over-activation of macrophages.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by Blue-Bio Industry Regional Innovation Center at Dongeui University (Busan, Korea), as an RIC program under the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy and Busan City (RIC; grant no. RIC08-06-07), and the Basic Science Research Program through a National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korea government (grant no. 2015R1A2A2A01004633).

References

1 

Zhang X and Mosser DM: Macrophage activation by endogenous danger signals. J Pathol. 214:161–178. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Fujihara M, Muroi M, Tanamoto K, Suzuki T, Azuma H and Ikeda H: Molecular mechanisms of macrophage activation and deactivation by lipopolysaccharide: Roles of the receptor complex. Pharmacol Ther. 100:171–194. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Park BS and Lee JO: Recognition of lipopolysaccharide pattern by TLR4 complexes. Exp Mol Med. 45:e662013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Kapadia M and Sakic B: Autoimmune and inflammatory mechanisms of CNS damage. Prog Neurobiol. 95:301–333. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Laveti D, Kumar M, Hemalatha R, Sistla R, Naidu VG, Talla V, Verma V, Kaur N and Nagpal R: Anti-inflammatory treatments for chronic diseases: A review. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 12:349–361. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Muralidharan S and Mandrekar P: Cellular stress response and innate immune signaling: Integrating pathways in host defense and inflammation. J Leukoc Biol. 94:1167–1184. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Guha M and Mackman N: LPS induction of gene expression in human monocytes. Cell Signal. 13:85–94. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Li Q and Verma IM: NF-kappaB regulation in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2:725–734. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Caivano M: Role of MAP kinase cascades in inducing arginine transporters and nitric oxide synthetase in RAW264 macrophages. FEBS Lett. 429:249–253. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Uto T, Fujii M and Hou DX: 6-(Methylsulfinyl)hexyl isothiocyanate suppresses inducible nitric oxide synthase expression through the inhibition of Janus kinase 2-mediated JNK pathway in lipopolysaccharide-activated murine macrophages. Biochem Pharmacol. 70:1211–1221. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Choi J, Kim TH, Choi TY and Lee MS: Ginseng for health care: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials in Korean literature. PLoS One. 8:e599782013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Coleman CI, Hebert JH and Reddy P: The effects of Panax ginseng on quality of life. J Clin Pharm Ther. 28:5–15. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Kitts D and Hu C: Efficacy and safety of ginseng. Public Health Nutr. 3(4A): 473–485. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Shibata S: Chemistry and cancer preventing activities of ginseng saponins and some related triterpenoid compounds. J Korean Med Sci. 16:S28–37. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Chen RJ, Chung TY, Li FY, Lin NH and Tzen JT: Effect of sugar positions in ginsenosides and their inhibitory potency on Na+/K+-ATPase activity. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 30:61–69. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Lü JM, Yao Q and Chen C: Ginseng compounds: An update on their molecular mechanisms and medical applications. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 7:293–302. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Kim JY, Lee HJ, Kim JS and Ryu JH: Induction of nitric oxide synthase by saponins of heat-processed ginseng. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 69:891–895. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Park JS, Park EM, Kim DH, Jung K, Jung JS, Lee EJ, Hyun JW, Kang JL and Kim HS: Anti-inflammatory mechanism of ginseng saponins in activated microglia. J Neuroimmunol. 209:40–49. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Kang A, Hao H, Zheng X, Liang Y, Xie Y, Xie T, Dai C, Zhao Q, Wu X, Xie L and Wang G: Peripheral anti-inflammatory effects explain the ginsenosides paradox between poor brain distribution and anti-depression efficacy. J Neuroinflammation. 8:1002011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Sugimoto S, Nakamura S, Matsuda H, Kitagawa N and Yoshikawa M: Chemical constituents from seeds of Panax ginseng: Structure of new dammarane-type triterpene ketone, panaxadione, and hplc comparisons of seeds and flesh. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 57:283–287. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Dinarello CA: Proinflammatory cytokines. Chest. 118:503–508. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Koppula S, Kumar H, Kim IS and Choi DK: Reactive oxygen species and inhibitors of inflammatory enzymes, NADPH oxidase, and iNOS in experimental models of Parkinson's disease. Mediators Inflamm. 823902:20122012.

23 

Martinon F: Signaling by ROS drives inflammasome activation. Eur J Immunol. 40:616–619. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Korbecki J, Baranowska-Bosiacka I, Gutowska I and Chlubek D: The effect of reactive oxygen species on the synthesis of prostanoids from arachidonic acid. J Physiol Pharmacol. 64:409–421. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

25 

Marcus JS, Karackattu SL, Fleegal MA and Sumners C: Cytokine-stimulated inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in astroglia: role of Erk mitogen-activated protein kinase and NF-kappaB. Glia. 41:152–160. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Mercurio F and Manning AM: NF-kappaB as a primary regulator of the stress response. Oncogene. 18:6163–6171. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Klemm S and Ruland J: Inflammatory signal transduction from the Fc epsilon RI to NF-kappa B. Immunobiology. 211:815–820. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Sonis ST: The biologic role for nuclear factor-kappaB in disease and its potential involvement in mucosal injury associated with anti-neoplastic therapy. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 13:380–389. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Kim EK and Choi EJ: Pathological roles of MAPK signaling pathways in human diseases. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1802:396–405. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Huang P, Han J and Hui L: MAPK signaling in inflammation-associated cancer development. Protein Cell. 1:218–226. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Kaminska B, Gozdz A, Zawadzka M, Ellert-Miklaszewska A and Lipko M: MAPK signal transduction underlying brain inflammation and gliosis as therapeutic target. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 292:1902–1913. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

March-2016
Volume 11 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Jang KJ, Choi SH, Yu GJ, Hong SH, Chung YH, Kim CH, Yoon HM, Kim GY, Kim BW, Choi YH, Choi YH, et al: Anti‑inflammatory potential of total saponins derived from the roots of Panax ginseng in lipopolysaccharide‑activated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Exp Ther Med 11: 1109-1115, 2016.
APA
Jang, K., Choi, S.H., Yu, G.J., Hong, S.H., Chung, Y.H., Kim, C. ... Choi, Y.H. (2016). Anti‑inflammatory potential of total saponins derived from the roots of Panax ginseng in lipopolysaccharide‑activated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 11, 1109-1115. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2965
MLA
Jang, K., Choi, S. H., Yu, G. J., Hong, S. H., Chung, Y. H., Kim, C., Yoon, H., Kim, G., Kim, B. W., Choi, Y. H."Anti‑inflammatory potential of total saponins derived from the roots of Panax ginseng in lipopolysaccharide‑activated RAW 264.7 macrophages". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 11.3 (2016): 1109-1115.
Chicago
Jang, K., Choi, S. H., Yu, G. J., Hong, S. H., Chung, Y. H., Kim, C., Yoon, H., Kim, G., Kim, B. W., Choi, Y. H."Anti‑inflammatory potential of total saponins derived from the roots of Panax ginseng in lipopolysaccharide‑activated RAW 264.7 macrophages". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 11, no. 3 (2016): 1109-1115. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2015.2965