Detection of TORCH pathogens in children with congenital cataracts
- Authors:
- Published online on: May 17, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3348
- Pages: 1159-1164
Abstract
Introduction
Congenital cataract is a severe eye disease with a complex pathogenesis that causes blindness in children. The development of genomics research has allowed the in-depth study of the cataract pathogenesis (1,2). During embryogenesis, viral and parasitic infections may influence the development of congenital cataract (3–5). Lifestyle changes, including changes in modern human sexuality and co-habitation with pets has resulted in increased herpes simplex virus (HSV) and toxoplasma (TOX) infection rates among pregnant women (6,7). In addition, the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including congenital cataracts, has also increased (6). A recent survey by Li et al (8) reported a primary infection of TOX, rubella virus (RV), cytomegalovirus (CMV) or HSV, abbreviated as TORCH infection, positivity rate of 17.2% among pregnant women living in Beijing, with the highest positivity rates being those of HSV immunoglobulin (Ig)M. These infections with TORCH during pregnancy can produce an embryopathy characterized by limb hypoplasia, eye and brain damage, skin lesions, and even death. The infection typically gains access to the fetus via the placenta (8). Following an investigation into the lifestyle habits of 2,356 pregnant women from 2005 to 2007, including a survey on pets, raw food diets, living conditions, and other lifestyle habits, Thaller et al (9) demonstrated that there was an increased incidence of infection with TOX among pregnant women living in rural areas who ate homemade bacon. Following infection, the immune systems of the pregnant women produce a series of antibodies that are transferred to the developing fetus through the placenta, and remain present for a specific period of time following birth (10). Mahalakshmi et al (10) reported an association between IgM antibodies against TORCH pathogens and congenital cataracts in a retrospective study of 593 children in Tamil Nadu Hospital of Chennai, India, using ELISA.
The present study aimed to determine the positivity rates of TORCH serum IgG and IgM antibodies in children with congenital cataracts, and compare these with the positivity rates in the non-TORCH control group; this includes assessment of the differences between single and double eye disease which are associated with TORCH infection. The study also examined any statistically significant differences in HSV II IgG levels in children with congenital cataracts.
Materials and methods
Study subjects
The study population consisted of a cataract and a control group. The cataract group included 69 children with congenital cataracts who were diagnosed and admitted to the Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine (Hangzhou, China) for surgical treatment. There were 33 boys and 36 girls, aged 1 month and 9 days to 7 years and 7 months, with an average age of 19.57±22.164 months. Among these, 32 cases of children with monocular cataracts and 37 cases of children with eye cataracts in both eyes were included. The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Treponema pallidum-specific passive hemagglutination assays (TPHA) of the children were negative. Cases that had a clear family history of genetic cataracts were excluded from the study.
The control group consisted of 5,914 randomly selected outpatients who were treated during the same time period (between years 2006 and 2013), including 2,843 boys and 3,071 girls aged 1 month to 7 years and 5 months (average age, 18.98±23.855 months). Their family genetic histories and HIV and TPHA test results were unknown.
All cases were TORCH-positive or negative and all suspicious cases (weak positive of suspected positive cases) reported as positive were excluded. The study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki, and with approval from the Ethics Committee of the Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine (Hangzhou, China). Written informed consent was obtained from all the legal guardians of the participants.
Collection of blood samples
A total of 1–2 ml peripheral fresh vein serum was collected from each patient and placed in anticoagulant tubes (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) at room temperature for ≤8 h. The samples that would be used for testing after 8 h were immediately stored at 2–10°C, and those that were expected to be tested after 24 h were immediately stored at −20°C. All samples were tested within 2 days of collection.
ELISA
ELISA was conducted using the following immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM test kits (Trinity Biotech Plc, Jamestown, NY, USA); TOX-IgM (cat. no. 2325160); TOX-IgG (cat. no. 2325100); RV-IgM (cat. no. 2325360); RV-IgG (cat. no. (2325300); CMV-IgM (cat. no. 2325260); CMV-IgG (cat. no. 2325200); HSV1-IgM (cat. no. 2325460); HSV1-IgG (cat. no. 2325400); HSV2-IgM (cat. no. 2325560) and HSV2-IgG (cat. no. 2325500).
Detection step
Measuring process of serum TORCH antibody (CMV-IgG was the example, and the measuring procedure of other pathogens was the same). The Immune Status Ratio (ISR) for each specimen was calculated by dividing the specimen optical density value by the Cutoff Calibrator Value determined by multiplying the Correction Factor by the mean Calibrator optical density.
A 50 ml 20X concentrated buffer solution I (Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 and ProClin as a preservative) was diluted with 1 L deionized water and mixed thoroughly. Gen5 version 2.0 (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) and BioTek Eon Microplate Spectrophotometer (BioTek) was used for the assay procedure.
The required number of microtest strips were placed onto a micropore frame. A total of 4 quality control materials and calibrators (1 negative quality control material, 2 calibrators, and 1 positive quality control material) were used in each test. A reagent blank was also prepared for each experiment. The quality control materials and calibrators were used to confirm that the software and photometer were configured correctly. Desiccant was added to the unused microtest strips, which were placed into a sealable bag and immediately stored at 4°C.
The test serum, quality control materials, and calibrators were diluted with serum diluent (provided in CMV IgG ELISA kit) at a 1:81 ratio (10+800 µl) and agitated. A total of 100 µl of the diluted calibrators, quality control materials, and serum were added to each well (96 well microassay plate), and 100 µl sample dilution was added to the blank well. The quality control materials and calibrators were confirmed to be correctly configured for the software and photometer. Each well was incubated at room temperature (21–25°C) for 30±2 min.
Subsequently, the liquid in the micropores was removed, and 250–300 µl diluted buffer solution (serum diluent with 0.1% ProClin as a preservative) was added to each hole. The microtest strips were washed once with washing buffer (provided in CMV IgG ELISA kit) using an automatic plate washer. The liquid was removed from the micropores and the microplate was placed upside down on absorbent paper to remove the remaining liquid, and washed five times. Following the final rinse, the microplate was again placed upside down on absorbent paper to remove all the remaining liquid. Taking care to avoid the formation of bubbles, 100 µl goat anti-human IgG horseradish-peroxidase enzyme conjugate was added to each well, including the blank well. Each well was incubated at room temperature (21–25°C) for 30±2 min, then washed as described above. Tetramethyl benzidine chromogenic agent substrate (100 µl; Trinity Biotech Plc) was added to each well, including the blank well. Each well was incubated at room temperature (21–25°C) for 15±2 min. A total of 100 µl stop buffer (1N H2S04) was then added to each well to terminate the reaction, including the blank well. The microplate was gently agitated to allow thorough mixing. The absorbance of each well was read 1 h following the addition of the stop buffer using a Victor ELISA analyzer (BioTek) at a wavelength of 450 nm. The absorbance of the reagent blank at 450 nm was <0.150. If the reagent blank absorbance was ≥0.150, the experiments were repeated.
Calculation and interpretation of the experimental results
The mean optical density (OD) values of the reference samples (the two calibrators) were calculated. To account for day-to-day fluctuations in assay activity due to room temperature and timing, Trinity Biotech Plc (Bray, Ireland) was used to determine the correction factor. The critical correction value was the mean absorbance value of the calibrator calculated in the first step multiplied by the correction factor. The ISR value of each sample was the OD value of each sample divided by the critical correction value. This is a qualitative kit, and the reference values were the cut-off values and the ISR values. The ISR values were used to determine the test results (Table I). The results of all antibody tests assessed in the current study were based on the ISR values. The following formulae were used: Cut-off value = mean OD value of the calibrator × correction factor; ISR value = OD value of patient serum samples/cut-off value.
Statistical analysis
SPSS 19.0 software (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. The ages of the children were compared using independent sample t-tests, and completely randomized design of four tables χ2 tests were applied to gender in order to compare the positivity rates of anti-TORCH antibodies between the cataract and control groups. According to the 2×2 tables (0.0%), the theoretical frequency was calculated, and based on this minimum expected count the appropriate P-values for Pearson χ2, calibration χ2, and Fisher's exact tests were determined. Data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant result.
Results
General characteristics
The age and gender of the cataract and control groups had a skewed (non-normal) distribution (Fig. 1). Due to the fact that there were >50 samples, Pearson χ2 tests were used to compare the gender between the groups, whereas independent samples t-tests were used to compare age. The results of both tests showed no significant differences (P>0.05l Table II).
Comparison of TORCH antibodies between the cataract and control groups
The rates of anti-HSV II IgG antibody positivity were significantly higher in children with cataracts (P=0.014); however, the differences in anti-HSV II IgM positivity rates between these groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Similarly, differences in the expression levels of IgG and IgM specific to other TORCH pathogens were also not statistically significant (P>0.05; Tables III and IV).
Comparison of TORCH pathogen positivity rates between children with monocular cataracts and children with binocular cataracts
The results of the χ2 tests demonstrated that no significant differences in the incidences of anti-TORCH IgG and IgM antibodies were present between children with monocular and binocular congenital cataracts (P>0.05; Tables V and VI).
Table V.Positive rates of anti-TORCH pathogen IgG antibodies in the monocular cataract and binocular cataract groups. |
Table VI.Positive rates of anti-TORCH pathogen IgM antibodies in the monocular cataract and binocular cataract groups. |
Discussion
Previous studies carried out on congenital cataracts caused by viral infections have predominantly focused on the RV (11). With regard to other pathogens, Madhavan et al (12) reported that HSV infection was associated with patients with congenital cataracts in India; Raghu et al (13) demonstrated that congenital cataracts were associated with HSV I infections; Shyamala et al (14) detected HSV II DNA in children with congenital cataracts; and Kuot et al (15) reported a case of a patient with early-onset Fuchs' corneal endothelial dystrophy associated with congenital cataracts and keratitis due to HSV infection. In addition, Hutchison et al (16) previously established an animal cataract model of Toxoplasma gondii infection.
Infections with TORCH pathogens such as HSV may affect the ectodermal tissues (17), from which the lens is derived. The author assumes that lens opacification after birth and existence of additional factors are likely the result of intrauterine TORCH infections, which can be identified by the detection of maternal IgG antibodies in the baby. However, IgG and IgM antibodies after birth are derived from the immune response generated by self-infection in children; therefore, the presence of IgM antibodies after birth may not be sufficient to definitively correlate the presence of TORCH pathogens with the development of congenital cataracts. The results of the analysis of both IgG and IgM antibodies in the present study correlated with the results of Mahalakshmi et al (10). However, lens opacification after birth in infants positive for IgG antibodies may reflect past infection, whereas for children with congenital cataract for whom lens opacification is not present at birth, congenital cataract is defined as cataract occuring within 1 years after birth. Some children with congenital cataract at birth have transparent lens, and these children typically have TORCH pathogens marked by IgM. These children are likely to have an intrauterine infection or a mother with an infection, and may harbor disease-causing viruses but without detectable clinical symptoms. Upon a second virus infection, the immune system would be re-activated, triggering a number of unknown biological mechanisms, finally leading to the appearance of clinical symptoms, such as cloudy lens.
In a study of HSV I primary infections, Lafaille et al (18) observed that children with toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) innate immune defects were more prone to developing HSV I encephalitis. Impaired TLR3 and UNC-93B, which depend on interferon-α/β innate immunity, can lead to HSV I manifestations in the central nervous system, particularly in neurons and oligodendrocytes (18). Nerve fibers have yet to be identified in the lens, although if present these may serve as a major route for HSV neuronal infection, and may also influence lens development via other direct or indirect means, such as keratitis, uveitis and retinitis (19). HSV II primarily leads to skin infections of the genital tract and below the waist, and infection of the fetus during pregnancy is more likely to occur (20). In the present study, the comparison of children with cataracts and the relatively large sample sizes demonstrated that anti-HSV I antibody expression levels were not high; however, anti-HSV II IgG levels were higher, suggesting that HSV infections may be risk factors of congenital cataracts.
Based on independent viral infection rates, Malathi et al (21) suggested that 10% of congenital cataracts were due to RV infection, and that IgM antibodies in children <6 months of age with congenital cataracts may be associated with RV. Highlighting the diversity of rubella syndrome, Ferrini et al (22) reported the case of a 12-month-old girl who developed a cataract 3 months after receiving the RV vaccine. Rubella infection rates were low in this study, and did not differ significantly between groups.
The most common symptom of the ocular manifestations of congenital toxoplasmosis is chorioretinitis (92%), followed by small eye and squint, iridocyclitis, cataract and glaucoma (23). Vandenbroucke et al (24) reported a case of congenital cataracts in a baby positive for TOX infection. However, TOX testing in the present study revealed a low incidence of TOX infection, and there were no statistically significant differences between groups.
Thibault et al (25) suggested that there was no causal association between CMV infection and congenital cataracts. However, a study of factors associated with cataract protein gene mutations including heat shock factor 4 (Hsf4b) conducted by Zhang et al (26) suggested that Hsf4b participates in the negative regulation of the CMV promoter as a downstream monitoring factor with a dual function as a transcriptional activator and inhibitor, affecting the channel activity of the lens protein and other biological substances. In addition, CMV often causes retinal choroidal inflammation, an eye inflammation that leads to changes in the lens environment, which is the basis for the formation of cataracts. Tran et al (27) demonstrated that 26% of necrotizing retinitis had cataracts. Given the higher levels of anti-CMV antibodies in the cataract group compared with the control group in the current study (CMV IgM: 15.50 vs. 11.80%; CMV-IgG: 23.20 vs. 17.00%) we recommend preventive treatment.
Traditionally, pediatric ophthalmology considers bilateral cataracts in children to be due to genetic and systematic diseases, whereas monocular cataracts are attributed to local phenomenon or abnormal development of other ocular structures (28). In the present study, there were no significant differences in the expression levels of TORCH pathogenic antibodies among children with monocular and binocular congenital cataracts.
Previous studies have demonstrated that the in vivo expression levels of anti-TORCH antibodies in women varies according to country and region. Lito et al (29) reported anti-RV IgG positivity rates of 93.3%, anti-TOX IgG rates of 25.7% and anti-CMV IgG rates of 62.4% among pregnant women in Portugal; Vilibic-Cavlek et al (30) reported anti-TOX IgG seropositivity rates of 29.1%, RV rates of 94.6%, CMV rates of 75.3%, HSV I rates of 78.7%, and HSV II rates of 6.8% among pregnant women in Croatia. Anti-TOX and CMV IgM positivity rates were 0.25 and 0.09% respectively, HSV I and HSV II were 1.2%, and RV rates were 0%. Sen et al (31) reported anti-CMV IgM positivity rates of 19.4%, anti-RV IgM rates of 30.4%, anti-CMV IgM rates of 34.7%, and anti-HSV II IgM rates of 33.5% in Indian women. Puccio et al (32) reported CMV infection rates of 62.5 and 91.4% among residents and immigrants in Italy, respectively. These results indicate that the areas with the highest anti-TORCH IgG antibody positivity rates in pregnant women were predominantly economically developed areas. Conversely, the areas with the highest anti-TORCH IgM antibody positivity rates in pregnant women in developing countries were predominantly located in underdeveloped communities, in which the occurrence of congenital cataracts was also higher (33). These results also suggest that TORCH pathogen infections are a risk factor for congenital cataracts.
In order to correct for errors due to the small sample size and to verify the trends identified when comparing cases with congenital cataracts to unaffected cases, the present study used a large number of control samples from the outpatient children. As TORCH pathogen positivity rates were not high and the size of the cataract sample in this study was relatively small, the significance of the results were limited. The half-life of maternal anti-HSV IgG antibodies in the serum of children is unknown, and it may be expressed to higher levels in neonatal serum. Therefore, it may be possible to obtain more significant results by evaluating cataracts during the neonatal period.
References
Dave A, Craig JE and Sharma S: The status of intercellular junctions in established lens epithelial cell lines. Mol Vis. 18:2937–2946. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang B, Wang KJ, Zhu SQ, Wang J and Ma X: Identification of the p. R116H mutation in a chinese family with novel variable cataract phenotype: Evidence for a mutational hot spot in αA-crystallin gene. Ophthalmic Genet. 33:134–138. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Matoba A: Ocular viral infections. Pediatr Infect Dis. 3:358–368. 1984. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cotlier E: Congenital varicella cataract. Am J Ophthalmol. 86:627–629. 1978. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lambert SR, Fernandes A, Drews-Botsch C and Boothe RG: Multifocal versus monofocal correction of neonatal monocular aphakia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 31:195–201. 1994.PubMed/NCBI | |
Barah F: Prevalence of herpes simplex types 1 and 2, varicella zoster virus, cytomegalovirus, immunoglobulin G antibodies among female university students in Syria. Saudi Med J. 33:990–994. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Akinbami AA, Adewunmi AA, Rabiu KA, Wright KO, Dosunmu AO, Dada MO and Adevemo TA: Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies amongst pregnant women at the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J. 17:164–167. 2010.PubMed/NCBI | |
Li Z, Yan C, Liu P, Yan R and Feng Z: Prevalence of serum antibodies to TORCH among women before pregnancy or in the early period of pregnancy in Beijing. Clin Chim Acta. 403:212–215. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Thaller R, Tammaro F and Pentimalli H: Risk factors for toxoplasmosis in pregnant women in central Italy. Infez Med. 19:241–247. 2011.(In Italian). PubMed/NCBI | |
Mahalakshmi B, Therese KL, Devipriya U, Pushpalatha V, Margarita S and Madhavan HN: Infectious aetiology of congenital cataract based on TORCHES screening in a tertiary eye hospital in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. Indian J Med Res. 131:559–564. 2010.PubMed/NCBI | |
Merdassi A, Limaiem R, Turki F, Chaker N, Falfoul Y, Mghaieth F, Korchane N and Matri LE: Ophthalmologic manifestations of congenital rubella. Arch Pediatr. 18:870–873. 2011.(In French). View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Madhavan HN: Laboratory investigations on viral and chlamydia trachomatis infections of the eye: Sankara Nethralaya experiences. Indian J Ophthalmol. 47:241–246. 1999.PubMed/NCBI | |
Raghu H, Subhan S, Jose RJ, Gangopadhyay N, Bhende J and Sharma S: Herpes simplex virus-1-associated congenital cataract. Am J Ophthalmol. 138:313–314. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shyamala G, Sowmya P, Madhavan HN and Malathi J: Relative efficiency of polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay in determination of viral etiology in congenital cataract in infants. J Postgrad Med. 54:17–20. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kuot A, Mills R, Craig JE, Sharma S and Burdon KP: Screening of the COL8A2 gene in an Australian family with early-onset Fuchs' endothelial corneal dystrophy. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 42:198–200. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hutchison WM, Hay J, Lee WR and Siim JC: A study of cataract in murine congenital toxoplasmosis. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 76:53–70. 1982. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Krummenacher C, Baribaud F, de Ponce Leon M, Baribaud I, Whitbeck JC, Xu R, Cohen GH and Eisenberg RJ: Comparative usage of herpesvirus entry mediator A and nectin-1 by laboratory strains and clinical isolates of herpes simplex virus. Virology. 322:286–299. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lafaille FG, Pessach IM, Zhang SY, Ciancanelli MJ, Herman M, Abhyankar A, Ying SW, Keros S, Goldstein PA, Mostoslavsky G, et al: Impaired intrinsic immunity to HSV-1 in human iPSC-derived TLR3-deficient CNS cells. Nature. 491:769–773. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Newman H and Gooding C: Viral ocular manifestations: A broad overview. Rev Med Virol. 23:281–294. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ashshi AM, Batwa SA, Kutbi SY, Malibary FA, Batwa M and Refaat B: Prevalence of 7 sexually transmitted organisms by multiplex real-time PCR in fallopian tube specimens collected from Saudi women with and without ectopic pregnancy. BMC Infect Dis. 15:5692015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Malathi J, Therese KL and Madhavan HN: The association of rubella virus in congenital cataract-a hospital-based study in India. J Clin Virol. 23:25–29. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ferrini W, Aubert V, Balmer A, Munier FL and Abouzeid H: Anterior uveitis and cataract after rubella vaccination: A case report of a 12-month-old girl. Pediatrics. 132:e1035–e1038. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vutova K, Peicheva Z, Popova A, Markova V, Mincheva N and Todorov T: Congenital toxoplasmosis: Eye manifestations in infants and children. Ann Trop Paediatr. 22:213–218. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vandenbroucke S, Foets B, Wouters C and Casteels I: Bilateral congenital cataract with suspected lens-induced granulomatous uveitis. J AAPOS. 18:492–494. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Thibault M, Leydet J, Tournier-Lasserve E, Crow YJ, Rivier F, Echenne B, Langlois C, Daudet H, Sarda P and Roubertie A: Genetic syndromes that mimic congenital infections: Report of 2 cases. Arch Pediatr. 18:1297–1301. 2011.(In French). PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang J, Hu YZ, Xueli L, Li S, Wang M, Kong X, Li T, Shen P and Ma Y: The inhibition of CMV promoter by heat shock factor 4b is regulated by Daxx. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 42:1698–1707. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tran TH, Bodaghi B, Rozenberg F, Cassoux N, Fardeau C and LeHoang P: Viral cause and management of necrotizing herpetic retinopathies. J Fr Ophtalmol. 27:223–236. 2004.(In French). View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chan WH, Biswas S, Ashworth JL and Lloyd IC: Congenital and infantile cataract: Aetiology and management. Eur J Pediatr. 171:625–630. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lito D, Francisco T, Salva I, Tavares Md, Oliveira R and Neto MT: TORCH serology and group B Streptococcus screening analysis in the population of a maternity. Acta Med Port. 26:549–554. 2013.(In Portuguese). PubMed/NCBI | |
Vilibic-Cavlek T, Ljubin-Sternak S, Ban M, Kolaric B, Sviben M and Mlinaric-Galinovic G: Seroprevalence of TORCH infections in women of childbearing age in Croatia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 24:280–283. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sen MR, Shukla BN and Tuhina B: Prevalence of serum antibodies to TORCH infection in and around Varanasi, Northern India. J Clin Diagn Res. 6:1483–1485. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Puccio G, Cajozzo C, Canduscio LA, Cino L, Romano A, Schimmenti MG, Giuffrè M and Corsello G: Epidemiology of toxoplasma and CMV serology and of GBS colonization in pregnancy and neonatal outcome in a Sicilian population. Ital J Pediatr. 40:232014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Maida JM, Mathers K and Alley CL: Pediatric ophthalmology in the developing world. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 19:403–408. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |