Laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of incarcerated indirect inguinal hernia in children
- Authors:
- Published online on: October 21, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3830
- Pages: 3553-3556
-
Copyright: © Yin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Indirect inguinal hernia (IIH) is the most common disease in pediatric surgery with an incidence ranging from 1 to 5% (1,2). In all cases of indirect hernia in children, the condition manifests itself mainly by incarceration in approximately 1/6 of all indirect inguinal cases (3).
Incarcerated IIH is very common in pediatric emergency surgery. In cases with shorter incarceration time, no obvious abdominal distension and no red or swollen scrotum and groin area, of manual reduction were used. In cases with longer incarceration time with red and swollen scrotum and groin area or conditions of low intestinal obstruction and presence of bloody stools in local scrotum, children required emergency surgery instead of manual reduction. Several studies on the application of laparoscopic surgery of incarcerated abdominal external hernia is available (4–6).
With the advancements of laparoscopy in Chinese pediatric surgery, we treated 64 cases of incarcerated IIH with laparoscopic surgery at the Xuzhou Children's Hospital (Jiangsu, China), and obtained better clinical effects compared with traditional methods.
Materials and methods
General information
From January, 2012 to December, 2014, 64 children were enrolled into the present study. These patients received laparoscopic surgery at the Department of Pediatric Surgery, and we reviewed their perioperative and postoperative follow-up studies. There were 43 males and 21 females, aged 3 months to 6 years (average, 2.1 years). The time of finding the groin mass ranged from 9 to 68 h (average, 20.8 h). We had 33 cases of right side, 15 cases of left side and 16 cases of bilateral inguinal indirect hernia with only one side incarceration. Clinical manifestations included vomiting, paroxysmal crying in infants and complaining about lower abdominal pain in preschoolers. Before surgery, the children were examined using abdomen standing film to exclude gastrointestinal perforation and ultrasonography of groin area was performed to further confirm hernia contents.
Selection criteria used for the laparoscopic group were: i) no bloody stools; ii) no obvious abdominal distension; iii) generally in good condition to tolerate pneumoperitoneum; iv) little or no red and swollen groin area; and v) preoperative abdomen standing film with no gastrointestinal perforation, abdominal ultrasound without many ascites.
The control group comprised 60 cases of children treated with traditional surgery. Table I shows the comparison between the two groups.
Study approval was provided by the ethics committee of Xuzhou Children's Hospital. Written informed consent was provided by the children's family and/or guardians.
Methods
Patients were placed in a supine position, lower limbs were slightly outreached, and general anaesthesia was performed with tracheal intubation. Longitudinal incision was performed on the skin around the navel area to widen the navel ring. Peritoneal incision was performed and a 5-mm trocar was placed under direct vision to establish pneumoperitoneum (8-10-mm Hg pressure, placed 30° laparoscope). Then a 3-mm deep incision on the left-mid abdomen was performed and 3 mm grasping forceps were placed. The operating table was adjusted to lower head higher feet posture and the patient's affected side was elevated. At that moment we could see clearly the internal ring of the affected side and the intestine or uterus in females, with attachment hernia. During surgery, patients received muscle relaxant and offered manual reduction under direct vision. Hernia contents were reconstructed in 44 cases successfully. In 13 cases we were not able to put back the hernia contents. In those cases, at the connection point of hernia blockage and abdominal wall, an incision was performed at approximately 0.5 cm to the upper edge of the hernia block. After mosquito vascular provoked anterior wall of the inguinal canal, we incised approximately 0.2–0.4 cm. Consequently we applied manual reduction under direct vision again and reconstructed the intestine successfully (Fig. 1).
Internal ring closure method
Percutaneous tissue was sutured with the epidural needle on both sides, inside (Fig. 2) and outside (Fig. 3) at the mouth of the inner ring and a single line and two-wire brought through the pinhole. We used a two-wire loop to lead a single line out of the body and ligated inner ring after making a knot (Fig. 4). During the hernia ring suturing process, we incised the inguinal canal's anterior wall and passed two needles through the incised anterior wall of groin in order to tighten the outer opening after making a knot (Fig. 5).
Small intestine necrosis processing method
We expanded the navel incision and pulled the necrotic bowel out of the abdominal cavity. Then we treated it with resection and anastomosis after the closure of mesangial hole. Intestine was then put back into abdominal cavity to re-establish pneumoperitoneum (hernial sac ligation step was the same as mentioned before). In the case of contralateral recessive hernia, family members were consulted again during the operation in order to obtain their consent for the surgery.
Postoperative treatment
Children without intestinal necrosis started drinking small amounts of water 6 h after the operation. In the absence of gastrointestinal reaction, children started liquid diet and were discharged 1–3 days after operation. Children with chronic intestinal necrosis fasted after operation and were treated with gastrointestinal decompression for 3 days. They were fully rehydrated at the same time. They gradually started liquid or semliquid food after 3 days. They all received postoperative anti-infection treatment for 3 to 5 days. Antibiotics were stopped when no abnormal blood was observed and they were discharged 5–7 days after operation.
Statistical analysis
SPSS 13.0 statistical software (Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analyses. Data are presented as mean ± SD. For comparison we used the t-test or χ2 test. P<0.05 showed statistically significant differences.
Results
The operation time in laparoscopic group ranged from 15 to 80 min (average, 41.5 min). Five cases suffered from mild edema of scrotum after operation and 2 cases had inguinal subcutaneous congestion. Symptoms disappeared after raising scrotum and local physiotherapy. Postoperative length of stay ranged from 2 to 7 days (average, 3.2 days). All the patients were out-patients and were followed up for 6 months to 1 year (average, 8.7 months), there were no recurrence of indirect hernia in the group. No concurrent hydrocele or testicular atrophy in male children was observed.
The operation time of for control group ranged from 30 to 95 min (average, 53.9 min). After the operation, we had 38 cases with obvious edema of scrotum and three cases with wound infection. Length of stay ranged from 4 to 7 days (average, 5.3 days) and they were followed-up to 6 months. We had 2 recurring cases (males), who agreed to the second surgery, 3 and 6 months after operation, respectively. For their second surgery we used the laparoscopic hernia sac high ligation method. Sixty cases of children were followed up from 6 months to 3 years (average, 1.5 years) and no secondary testicular atrophy or concurrent hydrocele in male children was observed (Table II).
Discussion
Pediatric incarcerated IIH is a common emergency treatment in pediatric surgery (mostly in infants). Many children have this condition for a long time before visiting a doctor. This can reduce the chance of a successful manual reduction and leads the medical team to opt for surgery. Traditional release of incarcerated hernia surgery needs to dissect the inguinal canal therefore the probability of postoperative complications, such as edema of scrotum, hematoma, indirect hernia recurrence is high. This method of surgery requires a 2-3-mm operation incision. Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia has been carried out for many years. This method has several advantages compared with the traditional method. Among the advantages are the small operation incision, small intraoperative injury, fast procedure and efficient, quick recovery with minimal impact on the patients' reproductive system (7). There are several studies (8–10) on performing laparoscopic technology for pediatric incarcerated IIH. Since 2011, our hospital has carried out two holes approach laparoscopic surgery treatment for incarcerated IIH and obtained satisfactory results. In the laparoscopic group we obtained better results compared to the control group. In the observation group, the operation time and length of stay was shorter while the incidence of postoperative complications was much lower compared with the control group.
Laparoscopic surgery treatment for incarcerated IIH offered several advantages: i) during the operation under anesthesia we supplied muscle relaxants; ii) after the reduction was carried out, we were able to directly observe the revascularization of hernia contents; and iii) in the case of no intestine necrosis, we obtained recovery almost as in the case of ordinary laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery. The recurrence rate of laparoscopic incarcerated hernia surgery is usually lower than that of traditional surgery (5), and we obtained the same type of results in the present study. In traditional surgery, under anesthesia, the return of hernia contents can be a serious problem for the surgeon, because it is difficult to explore the abdominal inner intestine through groin incision. Some Chinese doctors have reported good results using laparoscopic monitoring on children with failed manual reduction surgeries. They used grasping forceps to lead downward or adopting electric hook or scalpel to incise the inner mouth in the abdominal cavity (11). This method had the risk of avulsion of intestinal serosa or injury of edema intestinal near the inner mouth. We used the approach of opening part of the front wall of the inguinal canal through abdominal stripe incision, which could turn back the intestine quickly and reduce the damage for hernia contents because of reset force. For treating the inner mouth after turning hernia contents were returned, we used epidural needle with thread method. This was conducted easily and added no extra financial burden on the families. This approach may be appropriate for underdeveloped and poor regions. The results revealed that our method did not increase the risk of postoperative recurrence, and did not need any extra equipment.
In conclusion, compared with traditional surgery, laparoscopic surgery in pediatric incarcerated IIH has numerous advantages, such as fast reduction, small damage, short time of operation and length of stay, and certain clinical application value.
References
Wiener ES, Touloukian RJ, Rodgers BM, Grosfeld JL, Smith EI, Ziegler MM and Coran AG: Hernia survey of the Section on Surgery of the American Academy of Pediatrics. J Pediatr Surg. 31:1166–1169. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kapur P, Caty MG and Glick PL: Paediatric hernias and hydroceles. Pediatr Clin North Am. 45:773–789. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mackinnon AE: Hernia and hydrocelePediatric Surgery. 32. Atwell JD: Arnold; London: pp. 309–312. 1998 | |
Saggar VR and Sarangi R: Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of incarcerated inguinal hernia. Hernia. 9:120–124. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hoffman A, Leshem E, Zmora O, Nachtomi O, Shabtai M, Ayalon A and Rosin D: The combined laparoscopic approach for the treatment of incarcerated inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc. 24:1815–1818. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ferzli G, Shapiro K, Chaudry G and Patel S: Laparoscopic extraperitoneal approach to acutely incarcerated inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc. 18:228–231. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Endo M, Watanabe T, Nakano M, Yoshida F and Ukiyama E: Laparoscopic completely extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia in children: a single-institute experience with 1,257 repairs compared with cut-down herniorrhaphy. Surg Endosc. 23:1706–1712. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tatli D and Numanoglu KV: Transverse testicular ectopia associated with incarcerated inguinal hernia: a case report. Cases J. 1:2002008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kaya M, Hückstedt T and Schier F: Laparoscopic approach to incarcerated inguinal hernia in children. J Pediatr Surg. 41:567–569. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nah SA, Giacomello L, Eaton S, de Coppi P, Curry JI, Drake DP, Kiely EM and Pierro A: Surgical repair of incarcerated inguinal hernia in children: laparoscopic or open? Eur J Pediatr Surg. 21:8–11. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bin S, Hui W and Yang P: Laparoscopic high ligation of hernial sac for the treatment of 18 cases with inguinal incarcerated hernia in Chinese. J Minim Invasive Surg. 13:84–86. 2013. |