18F-FLT and 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging in the evaluation of early therapeutic effects of chemotherapy on Walker 256 tumor-bearing rats
- Authors:
- Published online on: November 3, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3869
- Pages: 4154-4158
Abstract
Introduction
Traditionally, the therapeutic effects of anti-tumor therapies are determined by detecting reductions in tumor size via ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging. However, this process requires a lengthy time interval of several months on average. For some intractable tumors, early treatment response evaluation can help to adjust the therapeutic schedule prior to changes in tumor size, which may avoid unnecessary toxic reactions and economic waste. Tumor cell proliferative activity is an important biological characteristic of malignant tumors that has been used to evaluate the responses of tumors to various treatments (1). However, not all tumors can be evaluated clinically via biopsy to detect alterations in the tumor cell proliferative activity during treatment. Therefore, a noninvasive, simple, and accurate in vivo method to detect tumor cell proliferative activity is required. Given the development of clinical applications for positron emission tomography (PET)-CT imaging, it is possible to use positron imaging agents to evaluate the effects of treatments on tumors, particularly with respect to early curative effects. Currently, F-18-fluoro-deoxyglucose (18F-FDG) is the most widely applied clinical positron imaging agent. This agent reflects glucose metabolism in organs and tissues and thereby is widely used in tumor diagnosis, staging, curative effect determination, and recurrence monitoring (2). However, some metabolically active tissues or lesions, including the myocardium, brain tissue, inflammatory areas, and certain benign tumors, may also exhibit increased uptake of imaging agents, leading to poor 18F-FDG imaging specificity (2). Previous preclinical and clinical studies have shown that F-18-fluoro-3′-deoxy-3′-L-fluorothymidine (18F-FLT), which is a pyrimidine analogue, reflects changes in the tumor cell proliferative activity and its uptake in tumor tissues is associated with this activity (3–13). Therefore, 18F-FLT may be used as a positron imaging agent for early evaluation of the curative effects of therapies on tumors. However, some studies have indicated that there may not be an association between 18F-FLT uptake and tumor cell proliferative activity (14,15).
Although 18F-FLT shares some biochemical characteristics with thymidine, it serves as a terminator of DNA strand synthesis and is not incorporated into the DNA strand. In addition, the dynamic differences between 18F-FLT and thymidine have not yet been clearly defined (16). The underlying mechanism of 18F-FLT, as well as its significance with respect to tumor diagnosis, also remains unclear. However, 18F-FLT is expected to be of value in terms of tumor diagnosis and curative effect evaluations. In the present study, 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG uptake were used to evaluate the early therapeutic effects of chemotherapy in Walker 256 tumor-bearing Wistar rats, and the correlations between uptake and tumor cell proliferative activity were analyzed.
Materials and methods
Establishment of the rat model
A total of 3 walker 256 ascites tumor-bearing Wistar rats (mean age, 6 weeks; mean weight, 135 g) were obtained from the Institute of Oncology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science (Beijing, China). All rats were pathogen-free and were housed in a specific pathogen-free room at a constant temperature of 25°C and humidity of 45%, with a 12 h light/dark cycle and ad libitum access to food and water. When the rats exhibited abdominal bulging, 5–6 ml of flaxen-colored ascites were collected and diluted with physiological saline to a 4×107 cells/ml suspension. A total of 30 additional healthy female Wistar rats (age, 5 weeks; weight, 120±20 g) were obtained from the Laboratory Animal Center of China Medical University (Shenyang, China). The prepared Walker 256 cell suspension was subcutaneously inoculated into the right axilla of healthy rats (0.2 ml/rat). Tumors grew within 7–10 days. Rats were used in the following experiments once the maximum tumor diameters at the inoculation sites grew to 1.5–2.0 cm. The present study was conducted in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The animal use protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of China Medical University.
Animal grouping and treatment
Walker 256 tumor model rats were randomly divided into two groups, a control group (n=10) and a chemotherapy group (n=20). Chemotherapy was performed via tail intravenous injection of epirubicin (Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Epirubicin was diluted to a concentration of 1 mg/ml, and each rat was administered a volume of 0.5–0.7 ml at a dose of 5 mg/kg body weight. At 24 h after chemotherapy, five rats each underwent 18F-FLT PET-CT or 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging. At 48 h after chemotherapy, five each of the remaining 10 rats underwent 18F-FLT PET-CT and 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging. Rats in the control group received tail intravenous injections of equivalent volumes of physiological saline and subsequently underwent 18F-FLT or 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging (n=5 for each treatment).
18F-FLT and 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging
18F-FLT and 18F-FDG were synthesized at the PET-CT Center of the Affiliated Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University with a Minitrace drug synthesis system (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). The FLT precursor was produced by Jiangsu Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd., (Changshu, China). A 0.2-ml volume of 18F-FLT or 18F-FDG (0.5 mCi) was administered to each rat via caudal vein injection. The radioactive intensity of the syringe was detected prior to and following injection. Following a period of 40 min, the rats were anesthetized via intraperitoneal injection of chloral hydrate (Chinese Medicine Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) at a dose of 3 ml/kg body weight. Each rat was subjected to PET-CT imaging 1 h after imaging agent injection. Each rat was fixed on a foam plate and placed in a PET-CT imaging system (Discovery ST16 PET-CT; GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences). CT acquisition conditions were set to 120 kV, 60 mA, and 5-mm layer thickness. A 3-dimensional acquisition model was used for PET. Each bed was scanned for 3 min from head to tail. Images were subsequently processed on a Xeleris workstation (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences). The ratio of ROI radioactivity counts in the tumor tissue to those in the same area of the contralateral soft tissue (T/M) was quantitatively determined.
Tumor tissue processing
Following imaging, the rats were immediately sacrificed by cervical dislocation and weighed. Tumor tissues were removed, flushed with physiological saline, and wiped dry to determine the radioactive intensities and weights. The percentage intake of radioactivity per gram of tumor tissue (% ID/g) was calculated. Tumor tissues were subsequently fixed in 10% neutral formaldehyde and processed into paraffin-embedding blocks within 24 h. Embedded tissues were sectioned into slides and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Immunohistochemical Ki-67 staining of the tumor tissues was performed using an Envision kit (cat. no. D-C1-08C22C; Wuhan Boster Biological Technology Ltd., Wuhan, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Ki-67 expression was determined via light microscopy by an experienced pathologist. Samples were considered to be Ki-67-positive if the tumor cell nuclei and occasional cytoplasm were stained brown. If only the cytoplasm but no nuclei were stained, the sample was considered negative. The positive percentage of Ki-67, which was termed as the labeling index (LI-Ki-67), was identified by scanning 10 random high-powered (magnification, ×400) fields per tumor section.
Statistical analysis
Data processing was performed using SPSS 17.0 statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Measurement data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation. Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare the data collected before and after chemotherapy, and Pearson correlation analysis was implemented. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
18F-FLT and 18F-FDG radioactivity distribution
PET-CT imaging demonstrated significant reductions in the distribution of 18F-FLT radioactivity in tumor-bearing mice at 24 and 48 h after chemotherapy, as compared with the control group (Fig. 1A-C). The T/M ratios were also significantly reduced (P<0.01, Table I). Similarly, the distribution of 18F-FDG radioactivity and T/M ratio significantly reduced at 24 and 48 h after chemotherapy (Fig. 1D-F; P<0.05; Table I).
Ki-67 labeling index
Tumor cells with brown-stained nuclei were considered to be proliferating cells. Compared with the LI-Ki-67 of the control group, the LI-Ki-67 values at 24 and 48 h after chemotherapy were significantly reduced in the tumor-bearing mice (58.92±4.85% vs. 41.00±5.70% and 58.92±4.85% vs. 25.96±3.42%, respectively; P<0.001; Fig. 2A-C; Table I).
Correlation analysis
18F-FLT uptakes (T/M) at both 24 and 48 h after chemotherapy correlated positively with the LI-Ki-67 (r=0.899). Meanwhile, the 18F-FDG uptake (T/M) after chemotherapy also correlated positively with the LI-Ki-67 (r=0.813). In both the 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG groups, the T/M correlated positively with the % ID/g (r=0.898 and 0.843, respectively).
Discussion
The present study primarily investigated whether changes in the 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG uptake in Walker 256 tumors during the early post-chemotherapy stage may reflect alterations in the tumor cell proliferative activity. The applicability of 18F-FLT for evaluating the early efficacy of tumor treatment was also assessed. The results demonstrated that alterations in the uptake of 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG after chemotherapy correlated positively with changes in tumor cell proliferation.
The present findings showed that the uptake of 18F-FLT by Walker 256 tumors was reduced during the early stage after epirubicin chemotherapy (24 h) and that 18F-FLT uptake exhibited an additional significant reduction 48 h after chemotherapy. Immunohistochemistry also demonstrated downregulated Ki-67 expression in the tumor tissues, suggesting that epirubicin may inhibit tumor proliferative activity, a process that could also be detected via 18F-FLT PET-CT imaging.
An alteration in the hydroxyl group of 4′-epirubicin from a cis- to a trans-form renders epirubicin a cell cycle-nonspecific drug, and its main mechanism of action is mediated through DNA binding (17,18). A previous in vitro experiment demonstrated that epirubicin was able to rapidly enter cells and bind to DNA, thereby inhibiting the nucleic acid synthesis and mitosis (19). From its mechanism of function, we concluded that since epirubicin inhibits cellular DNA synthesis, tumor cells use less thymidine and thus take up smaller amounts of the 18F-FLT thymidine analogue. The pyrimidine analogue 18F-FLT is involved in DNA synthesis, but not RNA synthesis, during the process of cell proliferation (20). 18F-FLT is transported into cells via passive diffusion and facilitated by Na+-dependent carrier transport. It is subsequently phosphorylated by thymidine kinase 1 (TK1) to yield 18F-FLT-monophosphate and is retained in the cell. TK1 is among the key enzymes necessary for the DNA salvage pathway, which is inactive in resting cells but exerts maximal activity in the late G1 and S phases of proliferating cells (21). Therefore, TK1 catalytic phosphorylation is the basis for the use of 18F-FLT as a tracer. It has previously been reported that TK1 activity is markedly increased in malignant tumor cells, when compared with benign cells (22). Furthermore, in tumor cells, mutations occur at the carboxy terminus of TK1, which inhibits the normal degradation of TK1 during the M phase; as a result, the activity of TK1 increases abnormally in tumor cells (23). Therefore, actively proliferating tumors are able to take up 18F-FLT and exhibit focally concentrated radioactivity on PET-CT. Accordingly, the reduced uptake of 18F-FLT by Walker 256 tumors following epirubicin chemotherapy may have been associated with inhibited cell proliferative activity. The amount of 18F-FLT uptake may be used to reflect tumor cell proliferation during the early stage after chemotherapy.
Although the study demonstrated an association between 18F-FLT uptake and cell proliferation, in contrast to the opposing results achieved by other scholars (14,15), it is important to note that there are two tumor DNA synthesis pathways, de novo synthesis and salvage synthesis. Different tumors may employ different DNA synthesis pathways. Some tumors predominantly use salvage synthesis, whereas others typically use de novo synthesis (24). TK1 is an enzyme that only acts within DNA salvage synthesis, and thus it can only reflect DNA salvage synthesis activity in tumors. Chemotherapy drugs can induce a transformation between the two synthetic routes. Certain chemotherapy drugs are able to activate the DNA salvage synthesis pathway by inhibiting the de novo synthesis pathway, thus increasing TK1 activity and 18F-FLT uptake. For instance, the chemotherapy drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) can transform into its derivatives fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate and fluorouridine triphosphate in vivo and thus block the synthesis of dTMP (25). Accordingly, 5-FU can affect DNA biosynthesis, induce S phase stasis, and subsequently activate the DNA salvage synthesis route. Eventually, 5-FU therapy can result in increased TK1 activity. This increased TK1 activity promotes 18F-FLT uptake but downregulates DNA synthesis and subsequently reduces the cell proliferation rate (26). In such situations, 18F-FLT uptake does not reflect tumor cell proliferation. Despite this finding, the role of 18F-FLT in tumor research cannot currently be denied. Its association with tumor cell proliferation requires more in-depth and detailed studies.
Different drugs inhibit tumor growth via various mechanisms at different cell cycle phases. 18F-FLT is only involved in the DNA salvage synthesis pathway, and thus, it does not reflect the proliferation of tumors that predominantly employ the de novo synthesis pathway. Therefore, when determining the effects of 18F-FLT uptake on tumor cell proliferation, the anti-tumor drugs and their mechanisms of action should be considered to ensure that 18F-FLT uptake provides a true reflection of tumor cell proliferation. Clinically, combination chemotherapy is used to treat patients with tumors, which leads to complicated changes in tumor DNA synthesis. In this situation, 18F-FLT uptake can hardly reflect tumor cell proliferation. Accordingly, additional preclinical and clinical research is required to eludicate the roles of 18F-FLT in different tumors treated via different methods (27).
18F-FDG uptake by tumors also decreased during the early stage after chemotherapy in the present study, a phenomenon that may have been associated with the mechanism of 18F-FDG uptake. In cells, 18F-FDG uptake predominantly depends on glucose transporter expression and hexose phospho-kinase activity on the cell membrane (2). Potential explanations for the decreased 18F-FDG uptake observed in tumors after epirubicin chemotherapy may include the following: Epirubicin may reduce the activity of hexose phospho-kinase and thus reduce 18F-FDG uptake by the tumor, and epirubicin may inhibit tumor cell division and thus lead to a lower energy requirement in these cells. Glucose is the main source of energy for tumor growth. Therefore, 18F-FDG uptake decreases if glucose utilization decreases. A decrease in 18F-FDG uptake is an indirect result of reduced tumor cell proliferation, whereas a decrease in 18F-FLT uptake by tumor cells is directly associated with reduced tumor cell proliferation. Therefore, 18F-FDG metabolism may also indirectly reflect tumor cell proliferation to some extent, although this metabolism may be influenced by various factors. For instance, blood sugar levels, the functional status of the brain tissue, and other factors may induce changes in the 18F-FDG uptake of tumor tissues. Conversely, cell proliferative activity may be among the factors influencing 18F-FDG uptake.
In conclusion, the results of the present study showed that 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG uptake by tumors correlated positively with the tumor cell proliferative activity during the early stage after chemotherapy. In other words, 18F-FLT and 18F-FDG uptake by tumors may reflect changes in the tumor cell proliferative activity during the early stage after treatment and may be an effective index for evaluating the early therapeutic effects of chemotherapy. In the present study, small animals were subjected to clinical PET-CT, resulting in poor image resolution. However, the correlation between the tumor uptake (T/M) as determined via PET-CT imaging and the actual tumor uptake (% ID/g) was also analyzed and the findings showed a good positive correlation between these factors, suggesting that PET-CT-determined T/M may reflect the actual uptake in small animal tumor tissues.
References
Colozza M, Azambuja E, Cardoso F, Sotiriou C, Larsimont D and Piccart MJ: Proliferative markers as prognostic and predictive tools in early breast cancer: Where are we now? Ann Oncol. 16:1723–1739. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mamede M, Higashi T, Kitaichi M, Ishizu K, Ishimori T, Nakamoto Y, Yanagihara K, Li M, Tanaka F, Wada H, et al: [18F]FDG uptake and PCNA, Glut-1, and Hexokinase-II expressions in cancers and inflammatory lesions of the lung. Neoplasia. 7:369–379. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shields AF, Grierson JR, Dohmen BM, Machulla HJ, Stayanoff JC, Lawhorn-Crews JM, Obradovich JE, Muzik O and Mangner TJ: Imaging proliferation in vivo with [F-18]FLT and positron emission tomography. Nat Med. 4:1334–1336. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Grierson JR and Shields AF: Radiosynthesis of 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine: [18F]FLT for imaging of cellular proliferation in vivo. Nucl Med Biol. 27:143–156. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rasey JS, Grierson JR, Wiens LW, Kolb PD and Schwartz JL: Validation of FLT uptake as a measure of thymidine kinase-1 activity in A549 carcinoma cells. J Nucl Med. 438:1210–1217. 2002. | |
Buck AK, Halter G, Schirrmeister H, Kotzerke J, Wurziger I, Glatting G, Mattfeldt T, Neumaier B, Reske SN and Hetzel M: Imaging proliferation in lung tumours with PET: 18F-FLT versus 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med. 44:1426–1431. 2003.PubMed/NCBI | |
Mier W, Haberkorn U and Eisenhut M: [18F]FLT; portrait of a proliferation marker. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 29:165–169. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shields AF: Positron emission tomography measurement of tumour metabolism and growth: Its expanding role in oncology. Mol Imaging Biol. 8:141–150. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
McKinley ET, Smith RA, Zhao P, Fu A, Saleh SA, Uddin MI, Washington MK, Coffey RJ and Manning HC: 3′-Deoxy-3′-18F-fluorothymidine PET predicts response to (V600E)BRAF-targeted therapy in preclinical models of colorectal cancer. J Nucl Med. 54:424–430. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mason NS, Lopresti BJ, Ruszkiewicz J, Dong X, Joyce S, Leef G, Sen M, Wahed AS, Mathis CA, Grandis JR and Thomas SM: Utility of 3′-[(18)F]fluoro-3′-deoxythymidine as a PET tracer to monitor response to gene therapy in a xenograft model of head and neck carcinoma. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 3:16–31. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Hoeben BA, Troost EG, Span PN, van Herpen CM, Bussink J, Oyen WJ and Kaanders JH: 18F-FLT PET during radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is an early predictor of outcome. J Nucl Med. 54:532–540. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang H, Liu B, Tian J, Xu B, Zhang J, Qu B and Chen Y: Evaluation of 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT for monitoring therapeutic responses of colorectal cancer cells to radiotherapy. Eur J Radiol. 82:e484–e491. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li Z, Herrmann K, Pirsig S, Philipp-Abbrederis K, Henninger M, Aichler M, Feuchtinger A, Walch A, Beer AJ, Ringshausen I, et al: Molecular imaging for early prediction of response to Sorafenib treatment in sarcoma. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 4:70–79. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Geven EJ, Evers S, Nayak TK, Bergström M, Su F, Gerrits D, Franssen GM and Boerman OC: Therapy response monitoring of the early effects of a new BRAF inhibitor on melanoma xenograft in mice: Evaluation of (18) F-FDG-PET and (18) F-FLT-PET. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 10:203–210. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Keen HG, Ricketts SA, Maynard J, Logie A, Odedra R, Shannon AM, Wedge SR and Guichard SM: Examining changes in [18 F]FDG and [18 F]FLT uptake in U87-MG glioma xenografts as early response biomarkers to treatment with the dual mTOR1/2 inhibitor AZD8055. Mol Imaging Biol. 16:421–430. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Krohn KA, Mankoff DA, Muzi M, Link JM and Spence AM: Ture tracers: Compraring FDG with glucose and FLT with thymidine. Nucl Med Biol. 32:663–671. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Grasl-Kraupp B, Ruttkay-Nedecky B, Müllauer L, Taper H, Huber W, Bursch W and Schulte-Hermann R: Inherent increase of apoptosis in liver tumors: implications for carcinogenesis and tumor regression. Hepatology. 25:906–912. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kolaja KL, Stevenson DE, Walborg EF Jr and Klaunig JE: Reversibility of promoter induced hepatic focal lesion growth in mice. Carcinogenesis. 17:1403–1407. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Monteiro LJ, Khongkow P, Kongsema M, Morris JR, Man C, Weekes D, Koo CY, Gomes AR, Pinto PH, Varghese V, et al: The Forkhead Box M1 protein regulates BRIP1 expression and DNA damage repair in epirubicin treatment. Oncogene. 32:4634–4645. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Been LB, Suurmeijer AJ, Cobben DC, Jager PL, Hoekstra HJ and Elsinga PH: [18F]FLT-PET in oncology: Current status and opportunities. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 31:1659–1672. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Munch-Petersen B, Cloos L, Jensen HK and Tyrsted G: Human thymidine kinase 1. Regulation in normal and malignant cells. Adv Enzyme Regul. 35:69–89. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Boothman DA, Davis TW and Sahijdak WM: Enhanced expression of thymidine kinase in human cells following ionizing radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 30:391–398. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kauffman MG and Kelly TJ: Cell cycle regulation of thymidine kinase: Residues near the carboxyl terminus are essential for the specific degradation of the enzyme at mitosis. Mol Cell Biol. 11:2538–2546. 1991. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cole PD, Smith AK and Kamen BA: Osteosarcoma cells, resistant to methotrexate due to nucleoside and nucleobase salvage, are sensitive to nucleoside analogs. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 50:111–116. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Foekens JA, Romain S, Look MP, Martin PM and Klijn JG: Thymidine kinase and thymidylate synthase in advanced breast cancer: Response to tamoxifen and chemotherapy. Cancer Res. 61:1421–1425. 2001.PubMed/NCBI | |
Dittmann H, Dohmen BM, Kehlbach R, Bartusek G, Pritzkow M, Sarbia M and Bares R: Early changes in [18F]FLT uptake after chemotherapy: An experimental study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 29:1462–1469. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dittmann H, Dohmen BM, Paulsen F, Eichhorn K, Eschmann SM, Horger M, Wehrmann M, Machulla HJ and Bares R: [18F]FLT PET for diagnosis and staging of thoracic tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 30:1407–1412. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |