Clinical diagnosis and treatment of pediatric anti‑N‑methyl‑D‑aspartate receptor encephalitis: A single center retrospective study
- Authors:
- Published online on: June 20, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6329
- Pages: 1442-1448
Abstract
Introduction
Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis was initially detailed by Dalmau et al (1) in 2007, who identified the anti-NMDAR antibody in the hippocampus and forehead of a young female suffering from paraneoplastic limbic encephalitis (PLE) accompanied by benign teratoma. At the initiating stage of disease development, adults with anti-NMDAR encephalitis are often characterized by mental symptoms, short-term memory loss and aphasia, whereas pediatric patients are accompanied by neurological symptoms, including epileptic seizure or status epilepticus, language reduction or silence, and movement disorders as the first symptoms (2), followed by the no-reaction period and the excessive exercise period (accompanied by involuntary movement and autonomic nervous instability) (3). Following the first case report in China in 2010 (4), there have been many case reports of adult and pediatric anti-NMDAR encephalitis (5), which has been regarded as the most common autoimmune encephalitis, ranking just after pediatric acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis (6).
Currently, etiological and epidemiological studies have demonstrated that the incidence of anti-NMDAR encephalitis is higher than other types of viral encephalitis (7–9). Diagnostic criteria for anti-NMDAR encephalitis include the generation of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against NMDAR (GLuN1 subunit) in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in pediatric patients, following excluding other possible causes (10,11). Prior to the diagnosis with serum and CSF antibody detection, treatments of suspected autoimmune encephalitis are typically administered on the experience of the physician (11), mainly including steroids and/or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). According to the positive results from antibody detection, disease treatment regimen may include steroid therapy, combination therapy, and plasma exchange (12).
Although anti-NMDAR encephalitis has been demonstrated to be a curable autoimmune disease, there is still no standard for immunotherapy (13). Furthermore, the understanding of anti-NMDAR encephalitis is currently based on case reports and/or small-sample studies (14). In the present retrospective study, the clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, imaging data, treatment methods, and follow-up of 23 pediatric patients with confirmed anti-NRDAR encephalitis were reviewed and analyzed.
Patients and methods
Study subjects
The present study included 23 pediatric patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, who were diagnosed at the Department of Neurology at The Children's Hospital of Hunan (Changsha, China) from January 2015-February 2016. All patients exhibited one or more of the following clinical manifestations: i) Abnormal behavior (mental symptoms) or cognitive dysfunction; ii) language dysfunction (continuous mandatory language that cannot be interrupted, language reduction and silence); iii) seizure; iv) movement dysfunction, dyskinesia or muscle rigidity, and/or abnormal posture; v) declined consciousness; and vi) autonomic dysfunction or central hypoventilation. All 23 patients were positive for the anti-NMDAR (GluN1 subunit) IgG antibody detection (in serum and CSF samples, especially CSF) and other possible causes were excluded (1,11).
Study methods
Clinical data of these 23 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis were retrospectively analyzed, including sex, age, prodromal symptoms, major clinical manifestations, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (15), CSF outcome analysis, PCR detection of CSF Herpes simplex virus (HSV) and Epstein Barr virus (EBV), blood C-reactive protein (CRP) detection. All pediatric patients underwent abdominal and pelvic MRI examinations or abdominal and testicular US detection, immunotherapy regimen, clinical prognosis and follow-up, and Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category Scale (PCPC) scores in the follow-up period (16). These patients were divided into the preschool (≤6 years old) and school age (>6 years old) groups (17), with the follow-up periods lasting from 4 months-2 years.
Disease treatment
According to doctors' decisions, first-line treatments included methylprednisolone shock treatment (20 mg/kg/day, for three consecutive days, once a week for 2 weeks) and high-dose IVIG (400 mg/kg/day, for five days). No continuous improvement at 4 weeks following immunotherapy, together with the Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category (PCPC) score ≥4, indicated treatment failure. Treatment failure cases were subjected to second-line treatment, i.e., the CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab), 375 mg/m2, once a week for 2-3 weeks (treatment could be repeated following 3 months when appropriate). In addition, the second-line treatment was also combined with plasma replacement or cyclophosphamide treatment (17). Follow-up was performed every 4 months (with the longest follow-up period lasting for 2 years), in which the patients were evaluated via the PCPC system and a score ≥3 indicated poor prognosis (16,18).
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Student's t-test was used for comparison of parametric data. Mann Whitney U test was used for comparison of non-parametric data. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Clinical characteristics of pediatric patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis
Clinical characteristics of pediatric patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis were analyzed (Table I). In these pediatric patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, there were 13 females and 10 males, with a male to female ratio of 1:1.3; an age range of 2 years, 5 months-13 years, 7 months, with a mean age of 7.38±3.41 years; 9 cases belonged to the preschool group (≤6 years), whereas 14 cases were older than 6 years. Furthermore, in these pediatric patients, there were 22 cases positive for serum anti-NMDAR detection and 20 cases positive for CSF anti-NMDAR detection, with 19 cases positive for both the serum and CSF detections. The mean follow-up period was 0.95±0.57 years, ranging from 4 months-2 years.
Table I.Clinical characteristics of pediatric patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis. |
Clinical manifestations of pediatric anti-NMDAR encephalitis
The pediatric patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis exhibited a variety of clinical manifestations, with neurological symptoms as the main first symptom, and a number of pediatric patients exhibited prodromal symptoms (Table I). A total of 8 pediatric patients (34.78%) reported prodromal symptoms, including 5 cases (21.73%) of fever, 1 case (4.34%) of cough, and 3 cases (13.04%) of vomiting, in which 1 patient reported both fever and vomiting. Furthermore, 20 cases (86.95%) displayed initial neurological symptoms, including dyskinesia, convulsion, or seizure, whereas 3 cases (13.04%) reported first psychiatric symptoms, including personal behavior changes and hallucination. For the neurological symptoms, there were 13 cases (56.52%) of epilepsy, 20 cases (86.95%) of convulsions, 6 cases (26.08%) of ataxia, and 5 cases (21.73%) of coma, and 21 cases (91.30%) of dyskinesia. For the psychiatric symptoms, there were 12 cases (52.17%) of personal behavior change, and 7 cases (30.43%) of hallucination. For children older than 6 years, there were 7 cases suffering from hallucination, and 10 cases reporting personal behavior changes. These results suggest that, pediatric patients were accompanied with diverse clinical manifestations of anti-NMDAR encephalitis.
Laboratory and imaging studies
CSF examination, CRP test, GCS scoring, EEG, and MRI examination of these pediatric patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis were analyzed (Table I). For CSF detection, the mean CSF protein content for pediatric patients ≤6 years (0.33±0.39 g/l) was significantly higher than those >6 years (0.23±0.11 g/l). However, no significant differences were observed in the CSF white cells, CSF glucose detection or blood CRP detection. Furthermore, the mean GCS scores for the pediatric patients ≤6 years and >6 years were 12.67±2.65 and 12.29±1.77, respectively. Furthermore, 20 pediatric patients (86.96%) reported EEG abnormalities, and EEG extreme δ brush was noted in 1 female child (Fig. 1). There were 10 cases (43.48%) reporting brain MRI abnormalities (Fig. 2). In addition, there were 3 pediatric patients positive for HSV-1, and 2 cases positive for EBV. No ovarian masses were detected.
Disease severity and clinical prognosis
The disease severity and clinical prognosis of these pediatric patients were then analyzed (Table II). Based on the first episode of anti-NMDAR encephalitis, 18 pediatric patients (78.26%) received the methylprednisolone treatment and intravenous IVIG treatment, whereas 3 pediatric patients received oxcarbazepine and 2 pediatric patients were treated with sodium valproate antiepileptic treatments. Furthermore, 6 pediatric patients (26.09%) received the second-line treatment with rituximab, in which 2 cases of treatment failure were subjected to plasma exchange and/or cyclophosphamide treatment. The second-line treatment included the rituximab treatment for 2-3 weeks, and cyclophosphamide treatment for 4-7 months. The treatment options for dyskinesia included diphenazine and piracetam, however no significantly satisfactory therapeutic effects were observed.
Table II.Therapy and sequelae of pediatric patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis. |
A total of 9 pediatric patients were treated in the intensive care unit, and 3 cases underwent the mechanical ventilation. During treatment, 11 pediatric patients had PCPC scores ≥4. In total, 19 cases (82.61%) reported a significantly improved condition. In these 19 cases, there were 12 cases (63.16%) of full recovery, 5 cases (26.31%) of mild disability, and 2 cases (10.52%) of moderate or severe disability (with a PCPC score of 3 or 4), for whom the symptoms were still improving following 4- and 9-month follow-up detection. No significant improvement was observed in the other 4 patients with disability (17.39%). For those fully recovered pediatric patients, 4 cases fully recovered at 3-5 months following symptom occurrence, and 8 cases fully recovered at 8-12 months following symptom occurrence. Furthermore, the recovery rate for patients ≤6 years was significantly higher than the patients >6 years. In those 19 cases with significantly improved conditions, the improved symptoms in 17 cases (89.47%) were associated with movement function, with ataxia as the last improved symptom in 1 case, whereas 3 cases reported disease recurrence.
Discussion
In recent years, investigation of the autoantibodies in the neuronal cell membrane and synapses, and the corresponding autoimmune encephalitis, has become a major focus in the field of neuroimmunology (1). The related investigation of autoantibodies in in neuronal cell membranes and synapses has not only changed the pattern of encephalitis study, but also expanded the study scope to cover the mental illness, epilepsy, dyskinesia and cognitive dysfunction (1). Previous studies have demonstrated that there are more cases of anti-NMDAR encephalitis than other kinds of autoimmune encephalitis (11,19). In 2010, the first case report of anti-NMDAR encephalitis was published in China (4), and many cases of adult and pediatric patients have been reported since (5). However, there are significant differences in the clinical symptoms between adult and pediatric patients. Although 60% of pediatric patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis exhibit seizure, dyskinesia, and localized neurological symptoms, 70% of young patients have psychosis and other psychiatric symptoms (20). The present findings demonstrated that pediatric patients >6 years old were associated with the trend to have similar psychotic symptoms. Armangue et al (21) have previously compared the symptoms between children older than 12 years and younger than 12 years, and have demonstrated that patients over 12 years of age exhibited more psychiatric symptoms. Titulaer et al (22) have studied 568 patients covering various age ranges, and their results demonstrated that 95.6% of these patients exhibit ≥3 symptoms, whereas only 0.7% have a single symptom. Patients with systemic syndromes often gradually develop to have lower level of consciousness, autonomic nervous instability, and hypoventilation (22). In general, these findings suggest that the diagnosis of anti-NMDAR encephalitis should be carefully considered when a single symptom or symptoms do not match with anticipating symptoms. For these cases, CSF and serum antibodies need to be re-evaluated. However, clinical relapse may be unilateral with single symptoms, which are less severe than initial symptoms (21). In one case from the present study, isolated behavioral and linguistic disorders occurred twice independently over the past 2-year follow-up period.
The present findings demonstrated that the protein contents in CSF in pediatric patients ≤6 years were significantly increased compared with those >6 years, whereas no significant differences were observed in other CSF detection indicators. This might be due to the fact that the older pediatric patients develop awareness early, and they received less lumbar puncture (20). Findings in MRI and video EEG (VEEG) were similar to the reports in adults (23). In 1 pediatric patient, EEG detection exhibited extreme δ brush, which is a special EEG pattern exhibited in 30% of adult anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients (24). In the present study, 82.61% of pediatric patients had significant clinical improvement or complete recovery. In most cases, patients recovered at 8-12 months following symptom onset. Disease duration and hysteresis response to immunotherapy were partially caused by the antibodies in the central nervous system (CNS), which has been confirmed by the detection of antibody synthesis within the CNS sheath (25,26), as well as the findings concerning the long-term infiltration of plasma cells into the brain parenchyma and meninges (27). Rituximab is able to diminish B cells and prevent B cells from entering the CNS to developing into antibody-producing plasma cells (28). Cyclophosphamide can pass through the blood-brain barrier, and affect T and B cells, increasing anti-inflammatory factors and contributing to immunosuppression (29). In the present study, 6 pediatric patients received and responded to the rituximab treatment (combined with cyclophosphamide in 2 cases), without recurrence. Furthermore, no pediatric patients exhibited obvious side effects during treatment.
This was a retrospective study, with no uniform systematic treatment approach (e.g., the criteria, interval time, and therapeutic duration for the first- and second-line treatments). Therefore, further in-depth studies are required to address these issues. In addition, the sample size herein was relatively small, and expanded sample sizes may be needed to develop anti-NRDAR encephalitis treatment criteria and predict recurrence risk factors. In the present study, no tumors were detected in patients, suggesting that the majority of patients did not develop potential tumors. Previous studies have demonstrated that younger patients are less likely to would develop tumors (30–32). Furthermore, these findings suggest that the pathogenesis for pediatric patients might differ from adults (14). Certain patients (usually older than 12 years) do suffer from teratoma, similar to young adults, which may be detected following the recovery of encephalitis (31,32).
In the present study, 3 pediatric patients were detected positive for HSV infection, all older than 6 years, and within them, 1 case developed anti-NMDAR encephalitis at 4 weeks following HSV infection. The symptoms are similar to those of HSV infection, with unclear etiology. In these cases, negative detection results were obtained for the CSF and brain, and MRI did not indicate new necrotic hemorrhagic lesions, with no response to acyclovir treatment. Therefore, it was unlikely to be caused by virus activation. Abnormal movement may persist for several months or years, which do not respond to anti-epilepsy and dopamine receptor antagonists. Anti-NMDA receptors may be produced by the immune system in response to infection. In the present study, for the pediatric patients with biphasic symptoms, CSF was negative for HSV PCR detection and positive for NMDA receptor antibody detection, and the brain MRI demonstrated no other changes, with no response to acyclovir treatment. However, the rituximab and cyclophosphamide treatment lead to significant improvement. These findings suggest an association between these two kinds of diseases. The results of the present study have indicated that certain pediatric patients with HSV infection may suffer from anti-NMDAR encephalitis. A previous study has suggested that NMDAR antibodies may be present in the serum or CSF in 11% of HSV-infected patients (33). The therapeutic effects for those pediatric patients ≤6 years were superior to those >6 years. This phenomenon might be caused by the fact that younger children may have an imperfect blood-brain barrier, through which, drugs may pass and enter into the CNS, thereby inhibiting immunity (29).
In conclusion, the present study investigated the common neurological symptoms of pediatric patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, and the majority of these patients responded to immunotherapy. Second-line immunotherapy (mainly including rituximab) was often effective and well-tolerated. Furthermore, extreme δ brush represents a notable feature of VEEG. These findings may contribute to the guidelines of disease treatment and relapse prediction of pediatric anti-NMDAR encephalitis.
Acknowledgements
None.
Funding
No funding was received.
Availability of data and materials
The data analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
YS and XZ analyzed and interpreted data regarding anti-NMDAR encephalitis disease; YS and MF performed the statistical analysis; JT and HL participated in data collection and statistical analysis. YS was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. LT conceived the study and helped revise the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Patient consent for publication
Consent for publication was obtained from the patients' parents.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Dalmau J, Tuzun E, Wu HY, Masjuan J, Rossi JE, Voloschin A, Baehring JM, Shimazaki H, Koide R, King D, et al: Paraneoplastic anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis associated with ovarian teratoma. Ann Neurol. 61:25–36. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Maccaferri GE, Rossetti AO, Dalmau J and Berney A: Anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptor encephalitis: A new challenging entity for consultation-liaison psychiatrist. Brain Disord Ther. 5:2152016.PubMed/NCBI | |
Peery HE, Day GS, Doja A, Xia C, Fritzler MJ and Foster WG: Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis in children: The disorder, its diagnosis, and treatment. Handb Clin Neurol. 112:1229–1233. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu CL, Liu L, Zhao WQ, Li JM, Wang RJ, Wang SH, Wang DX, Liu MY, Qiao SS and Wang JW: Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis with serum anti-thyroid antibodies and IgM antibodies against Epstein-Barr virus viral capsid antigen: A case report and one year followup. BMC Neurol. 11:1492011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang X, Fan C, Wu J, Ye J, Zhan S, Song H, Liu A, Su Y and Jia J: Clinical analysis on anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis cases: Chinese experience. Int J Clin Exp Med. 8:18927–18935. 2015.PubMed/NCBI | |
Granerod J, Ambrose HE, Davies NW, Clewley JP, Walsh AL, Morgan D, Cunningham R, Zuckerman M, Mutton KJ, Solomon T, et al: Causes of encephalitis and differences in their clinical presentations in England: A multicentre, population-based prospective study. Lancet Infect Dis. 10:835–844. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gable MS, Sheriff H, Dalmau J, Tilley DH and Glaser CA: The frequency of autoimmune N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis surpasses that of individual viral etiologies in young individuals enrolled in the California Encephalitis Project. Clin Infect Dis. 54:899–904. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gable MS, Gavali S, Radner A, Tilley DH, Lee B, Dyner L, Collins A, Dengel A, Dalmau J and Glaser CA: Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: Report of ten cases and comparison with viral encephalitis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 28:pp. 1421–1429. 2009, View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Modoni A, Masciullo M, Spinelli P, Marra C, Tartaglione T, Andreetta F, Tonali P and Silvestri G: Successful treatment of acute autoimmune limbic encephalitis with negative VGKC and NMDAR antibodies. Cogn Behav Neurol. 22:63–66. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gleichman AJ, Spruce LA, Dalmau J, Seeholzer SH and Lynch DR: Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis antibody binding is dependent on amino acid identity of a small region within the GluN1 amino terminal domain. J Neurosci. 32:11082–11094. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Graus F, Titulaer MJ, Balu R, Benseler S, Bien CG, Cellucci T, Cortese I, Dale RC, Gelfand JM, Geschwind M, et al: A clinical approach to diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis. Lancet Neurol. 15:391–404. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lancaster E: The diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune encephalitis. J Clin Neurol. 12:1–13. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kahn I, Helman G, Vanderver A and Wells E: Anti-N-Methyl-d-Aspartate (NMDA) Receptor Encephalitis. J Child Neurol. 32:243–245. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Luca N, Daengsuwan T, Dalmau J, Jones K, deVeber G, Kobayashi J, Laxer RM and Benseler SM: Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis: A newly recognized inflammatory brain disease in children. Arthritis Rheum. 63:2516–2522. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sternbach GL: The Glasgow coma scale. J Emerg Med. 19:67–71. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fiser DH, Long N, Roberson PK, Hefley G, Zolten K and Brodie-Fowler M: Relationship of pediatric overall performance category and pediatric cerebral performance category scores at pediatric intensive care unit discharge with outcome measures collected at hospital discharge and 1- and 6-month follow-up assessments. Crit Care Med. 28:2616–2620. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang X, Yang J and Li E: Prospective study of 20 children with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. Int J Pediatr. 43:72016. | |
Lee EP, Hsia SH, Huang JL, Lin JJ, Chan OW, Lin CY, Lin KL, Chang YC, Chou IJ, Lo FS, et al: Epidemiology and clinical analysis of critical patients with child maltreatment admitted to the intensive care units. Medicine (Baltimore). 96:e71072017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Heine J, Pruss H, Bartsch T, Ploner CJ, Paul F and Finke C: Imaging of autoimmune encephalitis-Relevance for clinical practice and hippocampal function. Neuroscience. 309:68–83. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dalmau J, Gleichman AJ, Hughes EG, Rossi JE, Peng X, Lai M, Dessain SK, Rosenfeld MR, Balice-Gordon R and Lynch DR: Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: Case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies. Lancet Neurol. 7:1091–1098. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Armangue T, Titulaer MJ, Malaga I, Bataller L, Gabilondo I, Graus F and Dalmau J: Spanish Anti-N-methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor (NMDAR) Encephalitis Work Group; Pediatric anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis-clinical analysis and novel findings in a series of 20 patients. J Pediatr. 162:850–856.e2. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Titulaer M, Mccracken L, Gabilondo I, et al: Clinical features, treatment, and outcome of 568 patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. In: International Congress of Neuroimmunology. 34–35. 2012. | |
Qin K, Wu W, Huang Y, Xu D, Zhang L, Zheng B, Jiang M, Kou C, Gao J, Li W, et al: Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antibody encephalitis presents in atypical types and coexists with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder or neurosyphilis. BMC Neurol. 17:12017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schmitt SE, Pargeon K, Frechette ES, Hirsch LJ, Dalmau J and Friedman D: Extreme delta brush: A unique EEG pattern in adults with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. Neurology. 79:1094–1100. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pruss H, Dalmau J, Harms L, Höltje M, Ahnert-Hilger G, Borowski K, Stoecker W and Wandinger KP: Retrospective analysis of NMDA receptor antibodies in encephalitis of unknown origin. Neurology. 75:1735–1739. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Irani SR, Bera K, Waters P, Zuliani L, Maxwell S, Zandi MS, Friese MA, Galea I, Kullmann DM, Beeson D, et al: N-methyl-D-aspartate antibody encephalitis: Temporal progression of clinical and paraclinical observations in a predominantly non-paraneoplastic disorder of both sexes. Brain. 133:1655–1667. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Martinez-Hernandez E, Horvath J, Shiloh-Malawsky Y, Sangha N, Martinez-Lage M and Dalmau J: Analysis of complement and plasma cells in the brain of patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Neurology. 77:589–593. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Martin Mdel P, Cravens PD, Winger R, Kieseier BC, Cepok S, Eagar TN, Zamvil SS, Weber MS, Frohman EM, Kleinschmidt-Demasters BK, et al: Depletion of B lymphocytes from cerebral perivascular spaces by rituximab. Arch Neurol. 66:1016–1020. 2009.PubMed/NCBI | |
Elkhalifa A and Weiner H: Cyclophosphamide treatment of MS: Current therapeutic approaches and treatment regimens. Int MS J. 17:12–18. 2010.PubMed/NCBI | |
Cundiff CA, Elawabdeh N, Naguib MM, Jactel SN, Demellawy DE, Abramowsky CR, Durham MM, Youssef L, Wittkamp ML and Shehata BM: Does MAP2 have a role in predicting the development of anti-NMDAR encephalitis associated with benign ovarian teratoma? A report of six new pediatric cases. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 18:122–126. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Power L, James J, Masoud I and Altman A: Tubal teratoma causing anti-NMDAR encephalitis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 36:1093–1096. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liang Z, Yang S, Sun X, Li B, Li W, Liu Z and Yu G: Teratoma-associated anti-NMDAR encephalitis: Two cases report and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 96:e91772017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
De Tiege X, De Laet C, Mazoin N, Christophe C, Mewasingh LD, Wetzburger C and Dan B: Postinfectious immune-mediated encephalitis after pediatric herpes simplex encephalitis. Brain Dev. 27:304–307. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |