Combination of magnetic resonance imaging and targeted contrast agent for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction
- Authors:
- Published online on: August 13, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.6600
- Pages: 3303-3308
-
Copyright: © Qin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in the world, despite the rates having significantly declined over the past decade (1). Numerous risk factors, including age, sex, social deprivation, smoking, use of anti-hypertensives or lipid-lowering drugs and diabetes mellitus, are associated with myocardial infarction (2–4). In the clinic, the treatment of AMI includes blood transfusion and a previous study has reviewed the risks and benefits of thrombolytic, anti-platelet and anti-coagulant therapies for myocardial infarction (5). In recent years, early diagnosis of myocardial infarction has been widely applied for patients with recent myocardial infarction or suspected or known coronary artery disease (6).
At present, ultrasound, positron emission tomography (PET) with fludeoxyglucose (FDG)/computed tomography and MRI are widely used for the diagnosis and staging of human cardiovascular diseases (7–9). Among these diagnostic methods, MRI provides a higher sensitivity and accuracy in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in the clinic (10,11). The clinical utility of cardiac MRI in patients with myocardial infarction has a high reproducibility and accuracy, allowing for detailed functional assessment and characterization of myocardial tissue determined by infarct size (IS), transmural extent of necrosis (TEN) and microvascular obstruction (MVO) (12). A previous study also reported that simultaneous assessment of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and FDG uptake using a hybrid PET/MRI system is feasible, which accurately predicted the regional outcome of wall motion after AMI (13). In addition, although numerous studies have reported on the diagnosis of myocardial infarction by using MRI (14,15), the diagnostic accuracy of MRI in diagnosing patients with early-stage myocardial infarction requires to be improved.
In the present study, a novel contrast agent, chitosan/Fe3O4-enclosed albumin (CFEA), was introduced and the efficacy of MRI with CFEA (MRI-CFEA) in the diagnosis of patients with early-stage myocardial infarction was assessed. The results indicated that MRI-CFEA not only improved the signal intensity in the localized area of the myocardial infarction, but also enhanced the diagnostic efficacy of MRI in the diagnosis of clinical patients with suspected myocardial infarction.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
The present clinical trial was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations for clinical study in China (approval number, 20140521TJ) (16). The present study was also approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College (Wuhan, China). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients or their relatives prior to their inclusion within the study.
Targeted contrast agent
The CFEA nano-size contrast agent was used for the diagnosis of patients with suspected early-stage myocardial infarction as previously described (17). Nano-size CFEA was produced using a covalent bond with albumin as previously described (18). The CFEA was administrated by intravenous injection. The nano-particle contrast agent to be visualized by the MRI system was administered by intravenous injection at 30 min prior to MRI.
Patients
A total of 68 patients (males, n=36; females, n=32) with suspected myocardial infarction were enrolled in the present study. In addition, 32 healthy individuals (males, n=15; females, n=9) were enrolled in the present study. The mean age was 45.6 and 42.8 years in patients with suspected myocardial infarction and healthy individuals, respectively. The present study included 68 patients consecutively registered between January 2015 and May 2016 at Tongji Medical College (Wuhan, China) with suspected myocardial infarction who wished to be included in the study. A total of 32 healthy individuals were recruited between January 2015 and May 2016 following a routine health check. All patients with suspected myocardial infarction were subjected to MRI scanning for the detection of early-stage myocardial infarction using conventional LGE-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (MRI) and MRI-CFEA. Patients with chest pain (which was rated using the rapid emergency medical scoring system (19)) and/or abnormities in the electrocardiograph and heart color ultrasound were included in the present study. Patients with a personal or family history of heart disease and/or myocarditis were also excluded from the study. All measurements were performed at the diastole status for patients with myocardial infarction.
ELISA
The serum levels of marker proteins were analyzed by commercialized ELISA kits [C-reactive protein (CRP; cat. no. DY1707), tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α; cat. no. DTA00C), interleukin (IL-1; cat. no. DLB50) and creatine phosphokinase (CPK; cat. no. DYDTA02P); all from R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). The operational procedures were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The results were performed by an ELISA reader system (1775×Mark™, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA).
MRI scanning
An MRI diagnosis system (Ingenia 1.5T CX; Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, OH, USA) was used to diagnose patients with suspected myocardial infarction using pre-programmed settings. These settings were optimized to reach the optimal image formation. The whole heart in all of the patients was subjected to MRI scanning according to the manufacturer's protocol. The details of principles and settings of MRI were described in a previous study (20). MRI processes included T1 and T2 parametric mapping. Imaging parameters were set as follows: Flip angle, 46°; repetition time, 3.2 msec; echo time, 1.40 msec; typical field of view, 340×260 mm2; matrix, 250×210; slice thickness, 6 mm; slice gap, 3 mm; receiver bandwidth, 977 Hz/pixel; and cardiac phases, n=25. The necessary dose of CFEA for optimal signal intensity for MIR detection was determined by analyzing MRI images following increasing doses of CFEA (0–0.5 mg/kg). Images were collected 10–15 min after the administration of 0.30 mg/kg CFEA or 0.1 mmol/kg contrast agent (Gadovist; Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany).
Image analysis
The MRI image sets were analyzed using the software included in the MRI system, based on which the presence and location of myocardial infarction was determined. Signal enhancement of MRI by CFEA was also measured with this preparatory program. Planimetric analysis of the myocardial infarction size was performed using the software included in the system (SyngoMR A30; Philips Medical Systems) and ImageJ 1.38× software (National Health Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Statistical methods
Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. SPSS version 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to perform all statistical analyses. All statistical analyses were performed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's post hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Characteristics of patients
A total of 68 patients with suspected myocardial infarction were enrolled in the present study. Baseline characteristics all patients are summarized in Table I. The median period between the index events, including chest pain or abnormities in the electrocardiograph and heart color ultrasound and MRI or MRI-CFEA examination was 2 days with an interquartile range of 1–4 days (21). The cohort included 36 male patients and 32 female patients and the mean age was 50±17.8 (range, 32.2–67.8) years and 54.3±18.1 (range, 36.2–72.4) years in male and female patients, respectively.
Specificity of MRI-CFEA in the early clinical diagnosis of patients with suspected myocardial infarction
The dose of CFEA to achieve the optimum signal intensity for MIR detection was identified as 0.30 mg/kg (Fig. 1A). The diagnostic efficacy of MRI-CFEA in patients with suspected myocardial infarction was then further analyzed. It was demonstrated that MRI-CFEA is more specific than MRI, as more patients were diagnosed with myocardial infarction (P<0.05; Fig. 1B). By MRI-CFEA, 50/68 myocardial infarction cases were diagnosed, which is significantly higher than the 38/68 myocardial infarction patients diagnosed by MRI (P<0.05; Table II). It was also indicated that MRI-CFEA was able to discriminate the infarcted regions based on a decreased fractional blood volume (FBV) and increased permeability-surface (PS) area product in the infarcted myocardium (Fig. 1C and D). A total of 42 patients were confirmed as having myocardial infarction and 20 patients were without myocardial infarction. These outcomes suggest that MRI-CFEA is a reliable method for early clinical diagnosis of patients with suspected myocardial infarction.
Morphological analysis of myocardial infarction
Next, the efficacy of the clinical utilization of cardiac MRI-CFEA in patients with myocardial infarction was assessed. It was observed that MRI-CFEA displayed the IS and transmural extent of necrosis more clearly than MRI for patients with myocardial infarction (Fig. 2A and B). It was also indicated that MRI-CFEA was able to detect the MVO for patients with myocardial infarction (Fig. 2C). These results suggest that MRI-CFEA is more accurate than MRI in detecting pathological features of myocardial infarction in suspicious patients.
Serology confirms the diagnosis of MRI-CFEA for patients with suspected myocardial infarction
Assessment of serological biomarkers of myocardial infarction demonstrated that serum levels of CPK were increased in patients with myocardial infarction compared with those in healthy individuals (P<0.05; Table III). Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the serum levels of CRP, TNF-α and IL-1 were increased in patients with myocardial infarction (P<0.05; Table III). Of note, MRI-CFEA is efficient in diagnosing patients with myocardial infarction along with high levels of CRP, CPK, TNF-α and IL-1.
Pharmacodynamics of CFEA in patients with myocardial infarction
Finally, the pharmacodynamics of CFEA were assessed after administration to the patients with myocardial infarction. It was demonstrated that CFEA was eliminated from the plasma within 24 h after intravenous injection (Fig. 3). This result indicates that CFEA may be easily eliminated from patients with myocardial infarction. No adverse effects were observed in the present study.
Discussion
Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction is an efficient method to decrease the mortality and morbidity of affected patients (22,23). At present, MRI is widely used for diagnosing myocardial infarction (14,15). Evidence has indicated that contrast agents increase the diagnostic efficacy in patients with AMI undergoing coronary angiography (24). In the present study, the diagnostic efficacy of the nano-size contrast agent CFEA combined with MRI was investigated to quantify the blood volume and permeability in the infarcted myocardium in a total of 68 patients with suspected myocardial infarction. It was indicated that MRI-CFEA is an efficient method for diagnosing patients with suspected myocardial infarction. Of note, a pharmacodynamics analysis demonstrated that CFEA was easily eliminated from patients with myocardial infarction within 24 h.
A previous study summarized the current knowledge of the pharmacokinetic principles of gadolinium chelates for enhancing the diagnostic value of cardiac MRI in the diagnosis of complications of myocardial infarction (25). In addition, delayed-enhancement 3.0T MRI with 0.15 mmol/kg of contrast agent superparamagnetic iron oxide provides more accuracy in the assessment of chronic myocardial infarction (26). The present study identified that the optimal dose of CFEA was 0.30 mg/kg to achieve the maximum signal intensity for MIR detection, which enhanced the diagnostic efficacy of MRI for patients with suspected myocardial infarction. A previous study also revealed that early assessment of myocardial contractility by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is inversely associated with the contractility after revascularization in patients after AMI (27). It was demonstrated that the nano-size contrast agent CFEA improves the signal intensity for the localization of the myocardial infarction area and the accuracy of MRI in the diagnosis of clinical patients with early-stage myocardial infarction.
The pathological characteristics of myocardial infarction patients include IS, TEN and MVO (28). The present study reported that MRI-CFEA clearly indicated the IS, TEN and MVO in patients with early-stage myocardial infarction. It was also demonstrated that MRI-CFEA was able to discriminate the infarcted regions based on a decreased FBV and increased PS area product in the infarcted region. Observation of these parameters facilitates the selection of a targeted therapy for patients with myocardial infarction.
Inflammatory responses are included in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and its clinical result, myocardial infarction (29). CRP and CPK-MB may act as mortality predictors in patients with AMI (30). The present study reported that the serum levels of CRP and CPK were upregulated in clinical myocardial infarction patients. According to previous studies, the serum levels of TNF-α and IL-1 were increased in patients with previous myocardial infarction (31,32). The present study demonstrated that the serum levels of TNF-m and IL-1 were increased in patients with myocardial infarction. The present results suggested that MRI-CFEA is efficient in diagnosing patients with myocardial infarction who also presented with elevated levels of CRP, CPK, TNF-α and IL-1.
In conclusion, the present study reported that MRI using CFEA as a contrast agent improved the sensitivity and accuracy of MRI in diagnosing patients with early-stage myocardial infarction. It was reported that MRI-CFEA was able to detect pathological characteristics of myocardial infarction. The present study may contribute to the development of methods for the early diagnosis of myocardial infarction, and may be used for evaluating the degree of myocardial infarction.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The authors acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81401388) and the Health Administration of Hainan Province, China (grant nos. 14A210259 and 1601320114A2002).
Availability of data and materials
The analyzed data sets generated during the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
JQ and SZ performed the experiments. TA designed the experiments for the study and ZL, YC and QQ analyzed the experimental data. The final version of the manuscript has been read and approved by all authors.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The present study was also approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College and written informed consent was obtained from all patients or their relatives prior to their inclusion within the study.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from all patients for the publication of their data.
Competing interests
The authors confirm that they have no competing interests.
References
|
Nam J, Caners K, Bowen JM, Welsford M and O'Reilly D: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the benefits of out-of-hospital 12-lead ECG and advance notification in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. Ann Emerg Med. 64:176–186.e9. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Barauskas M, Unikas R, Tamulenaite E and Unikaite R: The impact of clinical and angiographic factors on percutaneous coronary angioplasty outcomes in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 1:e150–e157. 2016.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sarikamis C, Caglar NT, Biyik I, Ozturk D, Uzun F, Akturk IF, Ayaz A, Tasbulak O, Celik O and Yalcin AA: Can thrombectomy and catheters used increase angiographically visible distal embolization in st elevation myocardial infarction? Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 1:e139–e144. 2016.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Woolf-May K and Meadows S: Appropriateness of the metabolic equivalent (MET) as an estimate of exercise intensity for post-myocardial infarction patients. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2:e0001722016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nascimento BR, de Sousa MR, Demarqui FN and Ribeiro AL: Risks and benefits of thrombolytic, antiplatelet, and anticoagulant therapies for st segment elevation myocardial infarction: Systematic review. ISRN Cardiol. 2014:4162532014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
El Aidi H, Adams A, Moons KG, Den Ruijter HM, Mali WP, Doevendans PA, Nagel E, Schalla S, Bots ML and Leiner T: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings and the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with recent myocardial infarction or suspected or known coronary artery disease: A systematic review of prognostic studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 63:1031–1045. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Christensen AV, Koch MB, Davidsen M, Jensen GB, Andersen LV and Juel K: Educational inequality in cardiovascular disease depends on diagnosis: A nationwide register based study from denmark. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 23:826–833. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Han W, Xie M, Cheng TO, Wang Y, Zhang L, Hu Y, Cao H, Hong L, Yang Y, Sun Z and Yu L: The vital role the ductus arteriosus plays in the fetal diagnosis of congenital heart disease: Evaluation by fetal echocardiography in combination with an innovative cardiovascular cast technology. Int J Cardiol. 202:90–96. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ahmad IG, Abdulla RK, Klem I, Margulis R, Ivanov A, Mohamed A, Judd RM, Borges-Neto S, Kim RJ and Heitner JF: Comparison of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) with stress nuclear perfusion for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 23:287–297. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nensa F, Mahabadi AA, Erbel R and Schlosser TW: Myocardial edema during acute myocardial infarction visualized by diffusion-weighted MRI. Herz. 38:509–510. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang Y, Graham JJ, Connelly K, Foltz WD, Dick AJ and Wright GA: MRI manifestations of persistent microvascular obstruction and acute left ventricular remodeling in an experimental reperfused myocardial infarction. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2:12–20. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Ahmed N, Carrick D, Layland J, Oldroyd KG and Berry C: The role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Heart Lung Circ. 22:243–255. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Rischpler C, Langwieser N, Souvatzoglou M, Batrice A, van Marwick S, Snajberk J, Ibrahim T, Laugwitz KL, Nekolla SG and Schwaiger M: PET/MRI early after myocardial infarction: Evaluation of viability with late gadolinium enhancement transmurality vs. 18F-FDG uptake. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 16:661–669. 2015.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Pegg TJ, Maunsell Z, Karamitsos TD, Taylor RP, James T, Francis JM, Taggart DP, White H, Neubauer S and Selvanayagam JB: Utility of cardiac biomarkers for the diagnosis of type V myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass grafting: Insights from serial cardiac MRI. Heart. 97:810–816. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Malbranque G, Serfaty JM, Himbert D, Steg PG and Laissy JP: Myocardial infarction after blunt chest trauma: Usefulness of cardiac ECG-gated CT and MRI for positive and aetiologic diagnosis. Emerg Radiol. 18:271–274. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zeng ZQ, Chen DH, Tan WP, Qiu SY, Xu D, Liang HX, Chen MX, Li X, Lin ZS, Liu WK and Zhou R: Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of human coronaviruses OC43, 229E, NL63, and HKU1: A study of hospitalized children with acute respiratory tract infection in Guangzhou, China. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 37:363–369. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Kousi E, Smith J, Ledger AE, Scurr E, Allen S, Wilson RM, O'Flynn E, Pope RJE, Leach MO and Schmidt MA: Quantitative evaluation of contrast agent uptake in standard fat-suppressed dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI examinations of the breast. Med Phy. 45:287–296. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Chen CL, Hu GY, Mei Q, Qiu H, Long GX and Hu GQ: Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxide particles for magnetic resonance molecular imaging of lung cancer cells in vitro. Chin Med J (Engl). 125:2322–2328. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Mehmood T, Al Shehrani MS and Ahmad M: Acute coronary syndrome risk prediction of rapid emergency medicine scoring system in acute chest pain. An observational study of patients presenting with chest pain in the emergency department in Central Saudi Arabia. Saudi med J. 38:900–904. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Sahibzada I, Batura D and Hellawell G: Validating multiparametric MRI for diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer in patients for active surveillance. Int Urol Nephrol. 48:529–533. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Andrade JM, Gowdak LH, Giorgi MC, de Paula FJ, Kalil-Filho R, de Lima JJ and Rochitte CE: Cardiac MRI for detection of unrecognized myocardial infarction in patients with end-stage renal disease: Comparison with ECG and scintigraphy. AJR. Am J Roentgenol. 193:W25–W32. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Lee HY, Choi JS, Guruprasath P, Lee BH and Cho YW: An electrochemical biosensor based on a myoglobin-specific binding peptide for early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Anal Sci. 31:699–704. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Westwood M, van Asselt T, Ramaekers B, Whiting P, Thokala P, Joore M, Armstrong N, Ross J, Severens J and Kleijnen J: High-sensitivity troponin assays for the early rule-out or diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in people with acute chest pain: A systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess. 19:1–234. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Gunebakmaz O, Duran M, Kaya Z and Kaya MG: Contrast agent: A scapegoat for serum creatinine increase in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing coronary angiography. Angiology. 64:4002013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Flavian A, Carta F, Thuny F, Bernard M, Kober F, Moulin G, Varoquaux A and Jacquier A: Cardiac MRI in the diagnosis of complications of myocardial infarction. Diagn Interv Imaging. 93:578–585. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Yang J, Ma H, Liu J, Wang C, Shi Y, Xie H, Huo F, Liu F and Lin K: Delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T using 0.15 mmol/kg of contrast agent for the assessment of chronic myocardial infarction. Eur J Radio. 83:778–782. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
|
Lim HE, Yong HS, Shin SH, Ahn JC, Seo HS, Oh DJ, Ro YM and Park CG: Early assessment of myocardial contractility by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (ceMRI) imaging after revascularization in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Korean J Intern Med. 19:213–219. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Nagata Y, Usuda K, Uchiyama A, Uchikoshi M, Sekiguchi Y, Kato H, Miwa A and Ishikawa T: Characteristics of the pathological images of coronary artery thrombi according to the infarct-related coronary artery in acute myocardial infarction. Circ J. 68:308–314. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Coker A, Arman A, Soylu O, Tezel T and Yildirim A: Lack of association between IL-1 and IL-6 gene polymorphisms and myocardial infarction in Turkish population. Int J Immunogenet. 38:201–208. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Beg M, Singhal KC, Wadhwa J and Akhtar N: ST-deviation, C-reactive protein and CPK-MB as mortality predictors in acute myocardial infarction. Nepal Med Coll J. 8:149–152. 2006.PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Vörös K, Prohászka Z, Kaszás E, Alliquander A, Terebesy A, Horváth F, Janik L, Sima A, Forrai J, Cseh K and Kalabay L: Serum ghrelin level and TNF-α/ghrelin ratio in patients with previous myocardial infarction. Arch Med Res. 43:548–554. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
|
Zeybek U, Toptas B, Karaali ZE, Kendir M and Cakmakoglu B: Effect of TNF-alpha and IL-1β genetic variants on the development of myocardial infarction in Turkish population. Mol Biol Rep. 38:5453–5457. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |
