Qingre Baidu mixture‑induced effect of AI‑2 on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in chronic and refractory wounds
- Authors:
- Published online on: March 13, 2019 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.7391
- Pages: 3343-3350
-
Copyright: © Shan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Chronic and refractory wounds do not heal normally, and the integrity of the skin of the affected patients is not achieved in 1 month, leading to an increased inflammatory response and tissue damage (1). Chronic refractory wounds pose a great psychological burden to patients and seriously affect their quality of life and are therefore are considered one of the most urgent problems to be resolved in the field of surgery (2).
Chronic and refractory wounds are usually caused by microbial colonization and are treated as serious infections. One of the main factors that influences the wound healing process is bacterial infection (3). The formation of bacterial biofilms is an important factor in the development of bacterial resistance and avoidance of the body's immune defense mechanisms. The bacterial density sensing system serves an important role in the formation of biofilms, which directly affects the formation and dissociation of biofilms (2).
The self-induction of the molecule autoinducer (AI)-2, which is the only molecule currently known to be capable of conducting signal transduction during intra- and interspecific interactions of bacteria, serves a key role in the formation and stability of the bacterial density induction system (2,4). AI-2 regulates the expression pattern of genes that promote biofilm development. An increased concentration of AI-2 leads to a high level of bioluminescence in Vibrio harveyi. AI-2 has been reported to be involved in numerous important processes in a number of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including biofilm formation, excretion of poison, production of antimicrobial agents, migration and genetic competence (5,6). It is well known that hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) serve a transcriptional role under conditions of hypoxic stress and activate a number of target genes, including phosphoglycerate kinase and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in cells (7–9). These processes contribute to endothelial proliferation, glycolysis and angiogenesis, which facilitates the generation of new cells (8). Therefore, there is close association between HIFs, VEGF and wounds healing.
Clinical observations of patients with chronic refractory wounds have revealed that these patients can significantly control and eliminate bacterial infection of the wound upon oral treatment with the QBM. The authors' previous results revealed that the traditional Chinese medicine QBM served an antibacterial role by regulating the immune function in mice with Staphylococcus aureus infection (10). Based on the clinical efficacy of the QBM, the present study focused on the effect of the self-inducer molecule AI-2 on chronic and refractory wounds in rats with Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.
Materials and methods
Animals
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=30; age, 6–8 weeks) weighing 200–250 g were obtained from Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd., (Shanghai, China). Rats were housed under conventional conditions at an appropriate temperature (22.0±0.5°C) and humidity (50–60%), and under a 12-h light/dark cycle (lights were switched on from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.). the rats were allowed free access to food and water. All experiments and procedures were carried out according to the Regulations of Experimental Animal Administration issued by the State Committee of Science and Technology of China [animal production license number: SCXK (Shanghai) 2012-0002].
Drugs and reagents
The QBM (cat. no. 160120) was purchased from the LongHua Hospital Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Shanghai, China). Its main ingredients are Chinese medicines, including Angelica sinensis, Viola mandshurica, honeysuckle, Red Peony root, Salvia miltiorrhiza, Forsythia suspensa, Astragali radix, Gleditsia sinensis and liquorice. The WXD (cat. no. 160413) was purchased from the LongHua Hospital Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The main ingredients are Chinese medicines including honeysuckle, wild chrysanthemum, Viola mandshurica, Gynura bicolor and dandelion. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (cat. no. 27853; Manassas, VA, USA).
The bacteria culture medium contained 1.5% tryptone (g/100 ml), 0.5% soy peptone (g/100 ml) and 0.5% NaCl dissolved in distilled water (pH 7.2±0.2).
Establishment of a refractory wound model
Rats were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal (IP) injection of sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg) and their lumbar spine was then sheared. The wound area was marked with a plastic bottle cap of 2 cm in diameter. A 2 cm-deep skin defect was produced by a surgical method under aseptic conditions for intramuscular injection of cortisone sodium succinate (8 mg/100 g). A Pseudomonas aeruginosa suspension wrapped in alginate, which was used as a type of biofilm, was prepared with a microball maker (quantitative quality control strain; Hangzhou Microball Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China). The bacterial concentration was 109 colony-forming units/ml. Next, 0.5 ml artificial Pseudomonas aeruginosa was injected into the wound surface of the animals to create a refractory wound model with bacterial biofilm infection.
The rats were randomly divided into five groups, namely a control group, model group, Cef control group, WXD control group and the QBM group, and treated for 20 days (n=6). The control group received water every day. The model and other groups were injected with 0.5 ml artificial Pseudomonas aeruginosa via the wound surface. Then, drug administration commenced at day 1 subsequent to the establishment of the model. The stomach and the wound surface were treated with saline every day. The wound surface was cleaned with 1:5,000 nitrofurazone solution prior to switching drugs. The rats in all groups had saline gauze topically applied according to the size of the wound. Then, two layers of aseptic and disinfected dry gauze were put on the wound, which was fixed with medical tape once daily. Concomitantly, each group was orally administrated with the corresponding drug (40 mg/kg) or physiological saline (10 ml/kg, once per day). The rats were anesthetized with an IP injection of sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg) and euthanized by decapitation following collection of the plasma at days 1, 3, 8, 15 and 20. One rat from each group was euthanized at each indicated time point. An area of 3×3 cm2 containing wound tissue and surrounding skin was cut. Part of the tissue was fixed with 4% formaldehyde at room temperature for 24 h and part was frozen at −80°C.
Measurement of AI-2 production in bacteria by Vibrio harveyi BB170 bioluminescence
Luminescence-based broth assays for AI-2 production were performed using Vibrio v BB170 as a biosensor strain. Briefly, Vibrio harveyi was cultured for 36 h on marine agar plates (cat. no. BD2216) at 26°C. Single colonies were cultured overnight on a rotary shaker (150 rpm) in 5 ml Marine Broth medium (Shanghai Canspec Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) until the reaching stationary phase at 26°C. Then, the colonies were diluted 1:500 and cultured overnight. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, DH5α and Vibrio harveyi BB170 were cultured overnight. The indicated bacteria, while growing at stationary phase, were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min at 26°C and then the supernatant was purified with 0.22-µm filtration membranes. A total of 180 µl diluted BB170 bacterial solution was mixed with the target bacterial supernatant at 26°C for 2, 4 or 6 h.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
IHC was performed on 5 µm sections of paraffin-embedded tissue with the indicated enzyme-labeled antibody at room temperature. Briefly, IHC using anti-HIFα monoclonal (1:200; cat. no. 36169; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) and anti-VEGF polyclonal (1:400; cat. no. AF-293-NA; R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) antibodies was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol. For detection, the paraffin embedded sections (5 µm) were heated at 60°C for 2 h and then deparaffinized with toluene and rehydrated in a graded alcohol series. To retrieve antigens, the sections were boiled for 15 min at 120°C in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0). The sections were then washed 3 times with PBS at room temperature and pre-incubated with goat immunoglobulin G (IgG; cat. no. ab150077; 1:5,000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) dissolved in PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA; pH 7.4) for 1 h. Upon incubation with the primary antibodies overnight, the sections were washed with PBS and then incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (cat. no. ab6721; 1:5,000; Abcam) in PBS containing 1% BSA for 50 min. Upon washing with PBS 3 times, the reaction was visualized with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine and H2O2 in the presence of nickel and cobalt ions. Nonspecific rabbit IgG (cat. no. ab188776; 1:5,000; Abcam) was used as the negative control and the sections were imaged by a fluorescent microscope (Olympus CX23; Olympus Corporaion, Tokyo, Japan).
ELISA
ELISA kits were used to determine the concentration of HIF-1α (cat. no. DYC1935-2; R&D Systems, Inc.), HIF-2α (cat. no. DYC1997-2; R&D Systems, Inc.), HIF-3α (Spbio, Wuhan, China) and VEGF (cat. no. MMV00; R&D Systems, Inc.) or interleukin-27 (cat. no. DY2274; R&D Systems, Inc.) in the bacterial supernatants. The indicated sample solutions were added to ELISA well plates and the specific-kit cytokine was bound via the immobilized antibody on the plate. Upon washing off the unbound substances, an enzyme-linked polyclonal antibody that was specific to each cytokine was added to the wells. Upon washing the unbound antibody-enzyme molecules, a substrate solution was added to the wells and the intensity of the color in the reaction developed proportionally to the quantity of specific cytokine bound in the initial step, as indicated in the manufacturer's protocol. The reaction was terminated and the color intensity was determined using a microplate reader at 450 nm.
Hematoxylin and eosin staining
The sections were heated at 60°C for 2 h, deparaffinized with toluene and rehydrated in graded alcohol prior to being immersed in hematoxylin for 5 min at room temperature. The sections were then washed with acidic alcohol (0.5% HCl in 70% ethanol), immersed in PBS for 5 min and stained by several immersions in eosin for 3 min at room temperature. Upon removing the excess eosin, the slides were dehydrated with ethanol (75–100%), cleared with xylene and mounted with a xylene-based mounting medium. The stained sections were observed under a light microscope and images were captured.
Immunofluorescence detection of biofilm formation
For detection of biofilm formation, the sections were heated at 60°C for 2 h, deparaffinized with toluene and rehydrated in graded alcohol. To retrieve antigens, the sections were boiled for 15 min at 120°C in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0). The sections were washed 3 times with PBS at room temperature and then pre-incubated with goat IgG dissolved in PBS containing 1% BSA (pH 7.4) for 1 h. Subsequently, the sections were incubated with concanavalin A-fluorescein isothiocyanate (0.3 mg/ml) at 4°C for 30 min. Upon washing with PBS, the sections were incubated for 15 min with propidium iodide (50 µg/ml). The sections were washed with PBS and mounted on slides (75×25×1 mm) with a drop of mounting medium. After sealing the edges with nail polish, the slides were stored in the dark at 4°C. Antibody localization and cell structures were visualized with a confocal microscope.
Immunofluorescence detection of macrophages
For detection of macrophages, the sections were heated at 60°C for 2 h, deparaffinized with toluene and rehydrated in graded alcohol. To retrieve antigens, the sections were boiled for 15 min at 120°C in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0). The sections were washed 3 times with PBS at room temperature and then pre-incubated with goat IgG at room temperature dissolved in PBS containing 1% BSA (pH 7.4) for 1 h. Upon overnight incubation with primary antibodies against cluster of differentiation (CD) 68 (cat. no. ab125212; 1:1,000, Abcam), the sections were washed with PBS and incubated with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG in PBS containing 1% BSA for 50 min at room temperature. Upon washing with PBS, the sections were incubated for 7 min with DAPI at room temperature. Then, the sections were washed with PBS and mounted on slides (75×25×1 mm) with a drop of mounting medium. Upon sealing the edges with nail polish, the slides were stored in the dark at 4°C. Antibody localization and cell structures were visualized with a confocal microscope.
Statistical analysis
Each experiment was performed at least three times, independently. A one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's test analysis was used to compare the values in multiple-groups. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. All statistical analyses were conducted with the SPSS 19.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Results
QBM increases the healing rate of refractory wounds
The effect of the QBM on the healing rate of refractory wounds in rats was first evaluated. The results revealed that the QBM-treated group exhibited an increased healing rate of refractory wounds. However, there was no obvious difference between the Cef group and the WXD group at day 8 (Fig. 1A and Table I). No abnormalities were observed in the morphology of the skin of the sham-operated group during the whole experimental period, while the animals in the other groups displayed varying degrees of damage (Fig. 1B). Specifically, on day 1, the inflammatory cells were markedly concentrated in the wound tissue of these groups, while on day 3, the animals in these groups exhibited diffuse distribution of inflammatory cells. There was an increased concentration of fibroblasts in the Cef, WXD and QBM groups. Telangiectasia and granulated tissue were observed in the QBM group. On day 8, the granulated tissues and newborn epithelia were increased in the other 3 groups. On day 15, there was an increased number of capillary vessels in the granulated tissue of the model group. The epithelium increased in the Cef and WXD, while the fibers in the heat-clearing group increased. The number of collagen cells increased prior to returning to normal levels. The tissue expressed more fibroblasts and collagen, and it almost returned to a normal state, in the QBM group. On day 20, the epithelium expressed in the model group, while the tissue expressed more fibers and collagen prior to almost returning to a normal state in the other groups. In summary, the healing speed of each group was faster than the healing speed of the model group. The QBM group exhibited the best curative effect, since it promoted granulation growth and improved healing speed (Fig. 1B).
QBM downregulates AI-2 and inhibits the formation of bacterial biofilms in chronic and refractory wounds
Group differences in terms of the expression of AI-2 are presented in Fig. 2. Following wound infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the expression of AI-2 peaked at day 8 in the control group. Compared with the model treatment, the QBM markedly downregulated the expression of AI-2. The level of AI-2 in the Cef and WXD groups was lower compared with in the control group, but it remained higher than that in the QBM group (Fig. 2A). To detect bacterial biofilm formation, immunofluorescence was performed. The results indicated that the biofilm formation rate was downregulated at day 20 in the QBM-treated group compared with the model group. This result indicated that QBM has a strong inhibitory effect on the formation of bacterial biofilms (Fig. 2B).
HIF-1α, HIF-2α and VEGF expression levels are upregulated by the QBM in chronic and refractory wounds
The present results revealed that the expression of HIF-1α, HIF-2α and VEGF in the serum of animals in the refractory wound model with bacterial biofilm infection was markedly upregulated by the QBM. The WXD also increased the level of HIF-1α, HIF-2α and VEGF, although not as markedly as the QBM. The effect of Cef on the expression of HIF-1α, HIF-2α and VEGF was decreased compared with the model group (Fig. 3A). Unexpectedly, the expression of HIF-3α in the serum of animals in the refractory wound model with bacterial biofilm infection was markedly upregulated by the WXD. The QBM also increased the level of HIF-1α, HIF-2α and VEGF, although not as markedly as the WXD. The effect of Cef on the expression of HIF-1α, HIF-2α and VEGF in the Cef group was decreased compared with in the model group (Fig. 3A). The same results were obtained by IHC for the HIF-1α and VEGF groups (Fig. 3B).
QBM recruits macrophages to chronic and refractory wounds
CD68 is a marker of macrophages. Macrophages rapidly engulf bacteria to restrict autoimmune disease or inflammation. The present study examined the content of macrophages in wounds. The results indicated that the QBM and WXD significantly recruited numerous macrophages to the wound compared with the model group (P<0.01). However, in QBM, WXD and Cef groups, the content of macrophages in the Cef-treated group was the lowest compared with the QBM and WXD groups (Fig. 4).
Discussion
Chronically refractory wounds require considerable medical resources every year. The key factor responsible for the failure of healing of such wounds is the presence of multiple species of bacterium, including Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with highly organized biofilms (11). Biofilm protection prevents the body's immune response from reaching the bacteria, which is an important factor in the failure of therapeutic treatment (12). The present study has demonstrated for the first time that the expression of AI-2 induced by the QBM on the biofilm of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa promoted the healing of chronic and refractory wounds (13).
The QBM is mainly composed of 10 herbs, including Radix Astragali, the root of red-rooted salvia and honeysuckle, which are traditionally used in the treatment of furunculosis and erysipelas. In the chronic refractory wound, the main types of bacterium detected are Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Therefore, the present study compared the effect of the QBM with another traditional Chinese medicine or Cef on the bacterial biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. The QBM-treated group displayed a significantly increased healing rate in refractory wounds. However, there was no obvious difference between the Cef group and the WXD group. Furthermore, the tissue expressed increased levels of fiber and collagen, and almost returned to a normal state, in the QBM group.
Quorum sensing (QS) is the cell-to-cell signaling system that reflects the ability of bacteria to respond to small signaling molecules secreted by various microbial species (14,15). The QS system is activated by extracellular receptors and is important in the formation of biofilms (16). Therefore, the QS system may be a key target for antimicrobial treatment. Numerous anti-infectious approaches against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms have been studied during the past decade, including antibiotic combinations. However, several problems remain to be resolved (17), including the extended use of antibiotics, which results in a high prevalence of bacterial resistance. Currently, traditional Chinese medical compounds that inhibit QS systems are being investigated. AI-2 is one of the QS molecules that mediates intra- and interspecies communication. AI-2 is formed from spontaneous rearrangement of 4,5-dihydroxy-2,3-pentanedione, which is produced by the enzyme LuxS and is the primary QS molecule produced by Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (18). AI-2 has been demonstrated to serve a pivotal role in biofilm formation, including in the initial bacterial aggregation and the production of virulence factors. AI-2 inhibits biofilm formation in Bacillus cereus (19), Candida albicans (20) and Eikenella corrodens (21), and promotes biofilm formation in Escherichia coli (22) and Streptococcus mutans (23). The present study demonstrated that the QBM downregulates AI-2 in biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and inhibits the formation of bacterial biofilms in chronic and refractory wounds (24).
HIF-α and VEGF serve important roles in cancer progression in various cancer cell lines (25). Previously, HIF-α and VEGF have been demonstrated to exhibit a high level of expression when a bacterial infection occurs (26). The results of the present study revealed that the levels of HIF-1α, HIF-2α and VEGF were upregulated by the QBM. The WXD also increased the levels of HIF-1α, HIF-2α and VEGF, although not to the same extent as the QBM. However, the effect of Cef on the expression of HIF-1α, HIF-2α and VEGF was decreased compared with the model group.
Macrophages have been reported to participate in the induction of inflammation (27). Infections with human pathogens that require macrophages in the infected wounds for control and recognition include infections with Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (28). In addition to recognition of bacteria by the host immune system, macrophages are recruited to the wound site and phagocytose the invading organisms. In particular, deficiencies in macrophage phagocytosis, as well as bactericidal potential, have been associated with reduced bacterial clearance, as well as chronic and refractory wounds (29). The present study used CD68, a marker of macrophages, to detect the content of macrophages, and observed that the QBM recruited macrophages to chronic and refractory wounds. This result demonstrated that the QBM serves a prominent effect in anti-bacterial defense.
A previous study reported that bacterial biofilms served a key role in the emergence of resistance to antibacterial agents (30). However, it is widely known that a mature biofilm matrix may provide the conditions for bacteria to elude the host immune response while forming a barrier against the majority of conventional antimicrobial treatments (31). Furthermore, numerous biofilm-associated mechanisms of drug resistance should also be considered. Increased mutation frequencies have been described in biofilm cultures of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, suggesting that the biofilm matrix provides an important environment to promote mutational resistance to antibiotics (32). In the present study, the effect of Cef on inflammation and wound healing in chronic and refractory wounds was decreased compared with the QBM.
The present study examined the effect of the QBM-regulated biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in chronic and refractory wounds. The QBM upregulated the expression of AI-2, HIF-1α, HIF-2α and HIF-3α and increased the levels of VEGF. These results provide novel insight into the complex interrelationships between chronic and refractory wounds and bacterial biofilms, and open the possibility of treating chronic and refractory wounds with traditional Chinese medicines.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
The current study was funded by grants obtained from the following institutions: The foundation of national natural science in China (grant no. 81503582); The Chinese medicine research fund of Shanghai health and family planning commission (grant no. 2014JP032A); The National TCM clinical research base, longhua hospital affiliated to Shanghai university of Chinese medicine (Seedling program; grant no. LYTD-37); The third batch of young doctors in Shanghai (personal funding); and China's 6th group of medicinal experts (personal funding).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
WS, YW, ZZ, JXi and JXu participated in experiment design, tissue collection and experiment execution. WX, YS and SG analyzed and interpreted the patient data, and were major contributors to the development of the first draft of the present manuscript. HQ conceived and designed the current study. WS and HQ reviewed and approved the final draft of the manuscript prior to submission.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethics approval for the present study was provided by the Longhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Animal Experimental Ethics Committee. The National Institutes of Health guide for the care and use of laboratory animals was strictly followed by the authors.
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Merckoll P, Jonassen TØ, Vad ME, Jeansson SL and Melby KK: Bacteria, biofilm and honey: A study of the effects of honey on ‘planktonic’ and biofilm-embedded chronic wound bacteria. Scand J Infect Dis. 41:341–347. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Clinton A and Carter T: Chronic wound biofilms: Pathogenesis and potential therapies. Lab Med. 46:277–284. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kathju S, Nistico L, Hall-Stoodley L, Post JC, Ehrlich GD and Stoodley P: Chronic surgical site infection due to suture-associated polymicrobial biofilm. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 10:457–461. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sun J, Daniel R, Wagner-Döbler I and Zeng AP: Is autoinducer-2 a universal signal for interspecies communication: A comparative genomic and phylogenetic analysis of the synthesis and signal transduction pathways. BMC Evol Biol. 4:362004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li M, Villaruz AE, Vadyvaloo V, Sturdevant DE and Otto M: AI-2-dependent gene regulation in Staphylococcus epidermidis. BMC Microbiol. 8:42008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Taga ME, Semmelhack JL and Bassler BL: The LuxS-dependent autoinducer AI-2 controls the expression of an ABC transporter that functions in AI-2 uptake in Salmonella typhimurium. Mol Microbiol. 42:777–793. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wiesener MS, Turley H, Allen WE, Willam C, Eckardt KU, Talks KL, Wood SM, Gatter KC, Harris AL, Pugh CW, et al: Induction of endothelial PAS domain protein-1 by hypoxia: Characterization and comparison with hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha. Blood. 92:2260–2268. 1998.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ikeda E, Achen MG, Breier G and Risau W: Hypoxia-induced transcriptional activation and increased mRNA stability of vascular endothelial growth factor in C6 glioma cells. J Biol Chem. 270:19761–19766. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Agarwala V, Choudhary N and Gupta S: A risk-benefit assessment approach to selection of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with early breast cancer: A mini review. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 38:526–534. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shan W and Que HF: The effect of qingre baidu mixture on the biofilm of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in chronic and refractory wounds. Guiding J Trad Chin Med Pharm. 23:12–16. 2017. | |
Driver VR and Blume PA: Evaluation of wound care and health-care use costs in patients with diabetic foot ulcers treated with negative pressure wound therapy versus advanced moist wound therapy. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 104:147–153. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Price LB, Liu CM, Melendez JH, Frankel YM, Engelthaler D, Aziz M, Bowers J, Rattray R, Ravel J, Kingsley C, et al: Community analysis of chronic wound bacteria using 16S rRNA gene-based pyrosequencing: Impact of diabetes and antibiotics on chronic wound microbiota. PLoS One. 4:e64622009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rondas AA, Schols JM, Stobberingh EE and Halfens RJ: Prevalence of chronic wounds and structural quality indicators of chronic wound care in Dutch nursing homes. Int Wound J. 12:630–635. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Camilli A and Bassler BL: Bacterial small-molecule signaling pathways. Science. 311:1113–1116. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Miller MB and Bassler BL: Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 55:165–199. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hentzer M, Wu H, Andersen JB, Riedel K, Rasmussen TB, Bagge N, Kumar N, Schembri MA, Song Z, Kristoffersen P, et al: Attenuation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence by quorum sensing inhibitors. EMBO J. 22:3803–3815. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Scutera S, Zucca M and Savoia D: Novel approaches for the design and discovery of quorum-sensing inhibitors. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 9:353–366. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sztajer H, Lemme A, Vilchez R, Schulz S, Geffers R, Yip CY, Levesque CM, Cvitkovitch DG and Wagner-Döbler I: Autoinducer-2-regulated genes in Streptococcus mutans UA159 and global metabolic effect of the luxS mutation. J Bacteriol. 190:401–415. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Auger S, Krin E, Aymerich S and Gohar M: Autoinducer 2 affects biofilm formation by Bacillus cereus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 72:937–941. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bachtiar EW, Bachtiar BM, Jarosz LM, Amir LR, Sunarto H, Ganin H, Meijler MM and Krom BP: AI-2 of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans inhibits Candida albicans biofilm formation. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 4:942014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Azakami H, Teramura I, Matsunaga T, Akimichi H, Noiri Y, Ebisu S and Kato A: Characterization of autoinducer 2 signal in Eikenella corrodens and its role in biofilm formation. J Biosci Bioeng. 102:110–117. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
González Barrios AF, Zuo R, Hashimoto Y, Yang L, Bentley WE and Wood TK: Autoinducer 2 controls biofilm formation in Escherichia coli through a novel motility quorum-sensing regulator (MqsR, B3022). J Bacteriol. 188:305–316. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang Z, Meric G, Liu Z, Ma R, Tang Z and Lejeune P: luxS-based quorum-sensing signaling affects Biofilm formation in Streptococcus mutans. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 17:12–19. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Geier H, Mostowy S, Cangelosi GA, Behr MA and Ford TE: Autoinducer-2 triggers the oxidative stress response in mycobacterium avium, leading to biofilm formation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 74:1798–1804. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Oh SY, Kwon HC, Kim SH, Jang JS, Kim MC, Kim KH, Han JY, Kim CO, Kim SJ, Jeong JS and Kim HJ: Clinicopathologic significance of HIF-1alpha, p53, and VEGF expression and preoperative serum VEGF level in gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 8:1232008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cane G, Ginouvès A, Marchetti S, Buscà R, Pouysségur J, Berra E, Hofman P and Vouret-Craviari V: HIF-1alpha mediates the induction of IL-8 and VEGF expression on infection with Afa/Dr diffusely adhering E. coli and promotes EMT-like behaviour. Cell Microbiol. 12:640–653. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang M, Jing L, Wang J, Yu Y, Cao L, Zhang L, Zhou X and Sun Z: Macrophages participate in local and systemic inflammation induced by amorphous silica nanoparticles through intratracheal instillation. Int J Nanomedicine. 11:6217–6228. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cuffini AM, Carlone NA, Xerri L and Pizzoglio MF: Synergy of ceftazidime and human macrophages on phagocytosis and killing of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother. 20:261–271. 1987. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Brubaker AL, Rendon JL, Ramirez L, Choudhry MA and Kovacs EJ: Reduced neutrophil chemotaxis and infiltration contributes to delayed resolution of cutaneous wound infection with advanced age. J Immunol. 190:1746–1757. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gander S: Bacterial biofilms: Resistance to antimicrobial agents. J Antimicrob Chemother. 37:1047–1050. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ghigo JM: Natural conjugative plasmids induce bacterial biofilm development. Nature. 412:442–445. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chew SC, Yam JKH, Matysik A, Seng ZJ, Klebensberger J, Givskov M, Doyle P, Rice SA, Yang L and Kjelleberg S: Matrix polysaccharides and SiaD diguanylate cyclase alter community structure and competitiveness of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during dual-species biofilm development with Staphylococcus aureus. MBio. 9(pii): e00585–18. 2018.PubMed/NCBI |