Honokiol induces apoptotic cell death by oxidative burst and mitochondrial hyperpolarization of bladder cancer cells

  • Authors:
    • Chi‑Hao Hsiao
    • Chih‑Jung Yao
    • Gi‑Ming Lai
    • Liang‑Ming Lee
    • Jacqueline Whang‑Peng
    • Ping‑Hsiao Shih
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 20, 2019     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.7419
  • Pages: 4213-4222
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Bladder cancer is one of the most common types of malignant tumor worldwide. Current treatments, including chemo‑/radiotherapy, only have limited efficacy on bladder cancer progression. Honokiol is an active component of Magnolia officinalis with multiple biological effects that may provide promising health benefits. In the present study, the anti‑cancer properties of honokiol against bladder cancer cells were investigated by flow cytometric analysis. The results revealed that honokiol exhibited significant anti‑proliferative effects on bladder cancer cell lines, particularly on BFTC‑905 human transitional cell carcinoma cells. Furthermore, honokiol at low doses (≤25 µM) induced cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase, while it induced significant apoptotic cell death at high doses (≥50 µM; P<0.05). Furthermore, a significant accumulation of reactive oxygen species was identified in honokiol‑treated cells. In addition, honokiol induced hyperpolarization of the mitochondrial membrane, which may lead to mitochondrial dysfunction. Finally, caspase‑3/7 activation was identified in high‑dose honokiol‑treated bladder cancer cells. These results suggest that honokiol induces apoptosis via the mitochondrial pathway and honokiol‑containing traditional herbal remedies may have a potential clinical application in the treatment of bladder cancer.

Introduction

Urothelial bladder cancer is the most common type of malignancy of the urinary tract, and its incidence and the number of associated mortalities are increasing. According to the estimates of the American Cancer Society for 2018, bladder cancer is the fourth most common cancer type in men, but is less common in women in the USA (1). Based on the Annual Report of the Taiwan Cancer Registry for 2015, the incidence of bladder cancer cases account for 2.07% of all cancer cases and ~50% of all urinary tract cancer cases, with 1.93% bladder cancer-related mortalities (2). Stratified by gender, the incidence of bladder cancer amongst all cancer types ranked 10th and 16th and the mortality rates ranked 12th and 15th in males and females, respectively. It has been reported that drinking water contamination and agricultural exposure to arsenic may be associated with the occurrence of bladder cancer (35). The southwest coast of Taiwan is an endemic area for bladder cancer with an increased incidence rate due to the contamination of drinking water with arsenic, also causing the symptoms of black foot disease (6). The pathological type of urothelial carcinoma (transitional cell carcinoma) accounts for ~94% of bladder cancers, and 60–80% of these tumors are superficial disease and confined to the urothelium or the lamina propria at diagnosis. According to the 2018 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, total endoscopic resection of visible superficial tumor [transurethral resection (TUR)] may be the only treatment required for low-grade pTaG1 low-grade papillary tumors (7). However, tumor recurrence is a major obstacle in patients with higher-grade Ta and T1 lesions. At 1 year post-TUR, ~20% of patients with low-risk and 40% of those with medium-risk disease have developed tumor recurrence. Patients with high-risk disease have an even greater recurrence rate of >90% at 1–2 years following TUR. In order to prevent local recurrence, the most commonly used therapeutic approach is intravesical instillation, whereby the agents are instilled into the bladder to delay or prevent tumor recurrence (8). Chemoradiation-based bladder preservation therapy is currently an alternative option for non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients (9). However, the current treatment strategies have limited efficacy with regards to inhibiting bladder cancer progression.

Chinese herbal medicines have been widely used as traditional and functional remedies in oriental medicine for thousands of years. Magnolia officinalis, also named Houpo in Chinese or Saiboku-tu in Japanese, is an ancient genus mainly distributed in Southeast Asia and Eastern North America and is known to improve allergic and asthmatic reactions (10,11). Magnolia has been reported to contain several biologically active components, including magnolol, honokiol (International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry name, 5,3′-diallyl-2,4′-dihydroxybiphenyl), 4-O-methylhonokiol, obovatol and certain other neolignan compounds, which have numerous and diverse actions (12). Honokiol is a biphenolic bioactive component of the bark of Magnolia, and it has been indicated to have multifunctional activities, including anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and chemopreventive effects (13,14).

It has been reported that honokiol has anti-cancer effects against glioblastoma multiforme, as well as head and neck, lung, breast, stomach and colorectal cancers, and exerts synergistic effects in combination with chemotherapy for cancer treatment (1519). However, only a small amount of evidence is available for bladder cancer. Previous studies suggested that honokiol is a potential agent against bladder cancer cell invasion and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (20); however, the capacity of honokiol to induce cell death and the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. In the present study, it was indicated that honokiol induced obvious reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and transient hyperpolarization of the mitochondrial membrane, which resulted in cell cycle arrest and further led to apoptotic cell death. These pre-clinical data indicate that honokiol-based novel intravesical remedies have promising potential to be applied for bladder cancer treatment in the future.

Materials and methods

Cells and materials

Honokiol, sulforhodamine B (SRB), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and 3,3′-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide (DiOC6) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). A fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) Annexin V Apoptosis Detection kit (cat. no. 556547) was obtained from BD Biosciences (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH2-DA) was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. (Waltham, MA, USA). The Bioresource Collection and Research Center (BCRC; Food Industry Research and Development Institute, Hsin Chu, Taiwan) provided the human bladder cancer cell lines, including T24 (BCRC no. 60062), BFTC-905 (BCRC no. 60068) and TSGH 8301 (BCRC no. 60145). The other reagents were of high grade and purchased from commercial companies.

Cell culture

T24 bladder cancer cells were cultured in McCoy's 5a basal medium supplemented with 1.5 g/l sodium bicarbonate, 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; all Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). BFTC-905 and TSGH 8301 bladder cancer cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 1.5 g/l sodium bicarbonate, 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin and 15% or 10% FBS, respectively. All cells were maintained at 37°C in a 5% CO2-humidified incubator (Steri-Cycle CO2 incubator; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.).

SRB cell viability assay

The cytotoxic effects of honokiol were determined using a modified SRB colorimetric drug-screening assay (21). In brief, cells were seeded into 96-well flat-bottomed plates (1,500 cells/well) in 200 µl medium. After 24-h incubation, the cells were treated with different concentrations of honokiol (0, 25, 50 and 100 µM; stock solution in DMSO, final DMSO concentration was ≤0.05%), followed by further incubation for 3 days. Subsequently, the medium was aspirated and the cells were fixed by addition of 100 µl 10% TCA for 2 h at 4°C. The plates were washed five times with water to remove TCA and air-dried for at least 1 h. This was followed by staining with 200 µl of 0.065% SRB for 30 min at room temperature, washing for five times with 1% acetic acid to remove any unbound dye and subsequent drying in a chemical hood. The bound dye was dissolved in 200 µl 10 mM Tris base (pH 10.5). The absorbance was read using a spectrophotometer (SpectraMax M2e; Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) at 570 nm. Cell morphology was examined under a light microscope (Olympus CKX41; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

Cell cycle analysis

Cells were treated with various concentrations (0, 12.5, 25, 50 and 75 µM) of honokiol for 72 h. The floating and adherent cells were then harvested prior to centrifugation at 600 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Subsequently, cells were washed twice with cold PBS and fixed with 70% ethanol and stored immediately at 4°C overnight. Following incubation, ethanol was removed and cells were incubated with a solution containing 25 µg/ml PI, 0.5% Triton X-100 and 0.2 mg/ml RNase A (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for 30 min after washing with cold PBS. A positive control group was established by exposing the cells to ultraviolet radiation for 1 h. Finally, the cells were re-suspended in 500 µl PBS and then analyzed by flow cytometry (BD Accuri™ C6 Plus; BD Biosciences). Data were collected from 10,000 cells and evaluated by using BD Accuri™ C6 software (version 1.0; BD Biosciences).

Measurement of intracellular ROS

The cells were treated with various concentrations of honokiol for 24 h. At the end of the incubation, the floating and the adherent cells were harvested and then incubated with DCFH2-DA (final concentration, 20 µM) for 30 min after washing with cold PBS. Finally, the cells were re-suspended in 500 µl PBS and analyzed by flow cytometry (BD Biosciences). The data for 10,000 cells were collected and evaluated with BD Accuri™ C6 software (BD Biosciences).

Annexin V/PI double staining assay

The cells were treated with various concentrations of honokiol for 48 h. At the end of the incubation, the floating and the adherent cells were harvested and then incubated with Annexin V-FITC and PI for 15 min at 37°C in the dark after washing with cold PBS. Finally, the cells were re-suspended in 500 µl PBS and then analyzed by flow cytometry (BD Biosciences). A positive control group was established by exposing the cells to ultraviolet radiation for 30 min for adjusting for fluorescence spectral overlap compensation. The data for 10,000 cells were collected and evaluated with BD Accuri™ C6 software (BD Biosciences).

Mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) evaluation

Cells were treated with various concentrations of honokiol for 48 h. At the end of the incubation, the floating and the adherent cells were harvested and then incubated with DiOC6 (final concentration, 40 µM) for 15 min at 37°C in the dark after washing with cold PBS. Finally, the cells were resuspended in 500 µl PBS and then analyzed in the FL-1 channel by flow cytometry (BD Biosciences). Data were collected from 10,000 cells and evaluated with BD Accuri™ C6 software (BD Biosciences).

Caspase 3/7 activity analysis

The activity of caspase-3/7 was assessed using a fluorometric Caspase 3/7 assay kit (cat. no. 556547; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The caspase-3/7 assay is based on the detection of cleaved fluorescent DEVD-7-amino-4-trifluoromethyl coumarin (AFC). In brief, the treated cells were re-suspended in 50 µl chilled cell lysis buffer and incubated on ice for 10 min. Following incubation, 1 ml of 2X reaction buffer (containing 10 µM DTT) was added to each sample and incubated in the dark for 1–2 h at 37°C in a 96-well plate. The fluorescence was measured with a fluorescence reader (SpectraMax M2e; Molecular Devices) using an excitation wavelength of 400 nm and an emission wavelength of 505 nm. Fold-increases in caspase-3/7 activity were determined by comparing the results for the treated groups with those of the untreated control and normalized to the respective protein concentration. Total protein was quantified using the Bradford dye-binding method (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA).

Statistical analysis

All assays were performed as three independent experiments with n≥3 in each test. Values are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistically significant differences between treatment group and control group were assessed by one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey's multiple-comparisons test using Prism 6.1d (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA).

Results

Honokiol significantly inhibits bladder cancer cell growth

First, the inhibitory effect of honokiol on bladder cancer cells was investigated. The human bladder cancer cell lines T-24 (human transitional cell carcinoma), TSGH-8301 (human urinary bladder carcinoma) and BFTC-905 (human bladder papillary transitional cell carcinoma grade III) were examined. It was revealed that honokiol exhibited a marked cytotoxic effect against all three bladder cancer cell lines, and BFTC-905 cells were more sensitive to honokiol at the lower concentration (25 µM; IC50=30±2.8 µM at 72 h of incubation; Fig. 1A), while no obvious difference in cytotoxicity was observed between the cell lines at high concentrations of honokiol. Of note, DMSO at 0.05% as the vehicle control did not exert any inhibitory effect on any of the three cell lines. Furthermore, cell morphological observation revealed that honokiol obviously reduced the amount of cells and induced cell detachment after 48 h of incubation (Fig. 1B). Due to its high sensitivity to honokiol, the subsequent experiments were performed using BFTC-905 as the model cells.

Honokiol induces cell cycle arrest and apoptotic cell death of bladder cancer cells

The effect of honokiol on cell cycle progression was then investigated. It was revealed that low doses of honokiol induced significant cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase (P<0.05), with the population in that phase demonstrating an increase from 60±4.8% in the control group to 70±8.4 and 76±7.9% in the groups treated with 12.5 and 25 mM honokiol, respectively, for 72 h incubation (Fig. 2A and B). Furthermore, the high dose of honokiol increased the population in sub-G1 phase that resembles apoptotic cells (P<0.05); the sub-G1 phase population increased from 3±1.8% in the control group to 38±3.7 and 46±2.8% following treatment with 50 and 75 µM honokiol, respectively, for 72 h (Fig. 2C).

Apoptotic effect of honokiol on bladder cancer cells

In the present study, the detailed effect of honokiol on apoptotic cell death was assessed. It was revealed that 50 and 75 µM honokiol significantly increased the proportion of cells in early apoptosis (Annexin V+/PI cells; 19±5.7 and 40±4.8%) compared with the control group (5±1.8%), following 48 h of incubation (P<0.05; Fig. 3). In addition, high-dose honokiol (75 µM) significantly induced late apoptotic cell death (21±6.7%) compared with the control group (3±2.8%; P<0.05).

Oxidative burst in honokiol-treated cells

The effect of honokiol on the redox status of bladder cancer cells was investigated. It was identified that high-dose honokiol (50 and 75 µM) induced a significant increase in ROS in bladder cancer cells (140±13.2 and 150±12.3%, respectively) compared with the control group, following 24 h incubation (P<0.05; Fig. 4).

Reduction of ΔΨm in honokiol-induced cell death

The present study further investigated the ΔΨm in honokiol-treated bladder cancer cells. By using the DiOC6 staining assay, it was identified that honokiol induced transient hyperpolarization of the mitochondrial membrane in bladder cancer cells (Fig. 5). Higher doses of honokiol (50 and 75 µM) induced a significant increase in ΔΨm (161±23.7 and 185±22.8%, respectively) compared with the control group after 24 h of incubation (P<0.05; Fig. 5).

Caspase-3/7 activation in honokiol-induced apoptotic cell death

Finally, the caspase activities in honokiol-treated bladder cancer cells were investigated. As presented in Fig. 6, caspase-3/7 was significantly activated in high-dose honokiol-treated bladder cancer cells in comparison with untreated control cells after 36 h of incubation (P<0.05). These results indicated that the intrinsic apoptotic pathway may have a critical role in honokiol-triggered apoptosis in bladder cancer cells.

Discussion

Flow cytometry is a well-known laser-based technology for cell characterization, functional assays and disease diagnosis utilized in basic research and for clinical examinations. Thus, it is a convenient and effective method for clinicians to investigate the molecular mechanisms of specific targets. Flow cytometric immunophenotyping is another sensitive, reproducible and low-cost quantitative auxiliary diagnostic technique with a fast turnaround time, particularly for the detection and classification of hematolymphoid neoplasms (22). DNA indexing, also named the Vindelov method, is recommended for single-parameter DNA studies by flow cytometry on fresh as well as frozen clinical samples, and various novel multicolour staining techniques for cell characterization and identification by flow cytometry have been developed for clinical application (23). Magnolia officinalis is a plant used in traditional Chinese and Japanese medicine that provides multiple benefits. In the present study, the anti-cancer properties of honokiol, a bioactive component derived from Magnolia officinalis, on bladder cancer cells were investigated by flow cytometric technology. It has been previously reported that honokiol reduced bladder tumor growth by blocking the enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit/microRNA-143 axis and inhibited bladder cancer cell invasion through repressing SRC-3 expression and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (19,20). In the present study, the cytotoxicity of honokiol against various human bladder cancer cell lines was first assessed. An SRB cell viability assay was performed to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of honokiol on three human transitional cell carcinoma cell lines. It was revealed that the human BFTC-905 cell line with grade-III malignancy exhibited the highest sensitivity to honokiol. Therefore, the subsequent experiments were performed with this cell line to investigate the mechanisms of honokiol-induced cytotoxicity. It was revealed that honokiol exerted its anti-cancer activity through induction of growth arrest, apoptosis and necrosis. Low-dose honokiol (<25 µM) induced cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase, while high-dose honokiol (50 and 75 µM) induced apoptotic cell death, and further induced necrotic cell death at concentrations of >100 µM (data not shown). It has been previously revealed that honokiol treatment had no obvious cytotoxicity on kidney epithelial cells at <15 µM and honokiol (50 µM) also protected the pancreatic β cells from intermittent hypoxia and high glucose-induced cytotoxicity (24). Honokiol also acts as a potent neuroprotective agent against the cognitive defects after traumatic brain injury in rats (25). It has also been reported that honokiol had an obvious cytotoxic effect on murine hepatic AML12 cells at concentrations of up to 40 µM, while at lower concentrations (<20 µM), honokiol exerted a cytoprotective effect against tert-butyl hydroperoxide-induced oxidative stress (26). Recently, it has been reported that honokiol acts as a potential antagonist against forkhead box M1, which may partially explain for its anti-cancer activity in several solid cancer cell lines (27). Based on the above, honokiol may have cell- and dosage-dependent anti-cancer and cytoprotective effects by targeting diverse pathways. The dosage-dependent effects of honokiol revealed in these in vitro studies may serve as a reference for animal in vivo studies in the future. To the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to provide evidence of honokiol-induced apoptotic death of bladder cancer cells. Based on the present results, it is likely that honokiol induces cell cycle arrest and apoptotic cell death by causing oxidative burst and hyperpolarization of the mitochondrial membrane. It has been previously revealed that honokiol induced apoptosis/autophagy of human glioma cells by ROS-mediated signaling transduction pathways and enhanced caspase activation (15,16). In line with this, the present study also indicated that honokiol induced significant ROS accumulation and stimulated caspase-3/7 activation. Honokiol may thus have an impact on several molecular pathways and have various biological functions. The ΔΨm is a decisive factor that determines the cell fate between survival and death (28). Of note, to the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to indicate that honokiol induced hyperpolarization of the mitochondrial membrane in bladder cancer cells. It has been proposed that under pro-apoptotic conditions, the closed state of the voltage-dependent anion channel may bring about a transient mitochondrial membrane hyperpolarization, followed by osmotic imbalance, outer membrane rupture, release of the intermembrane space proteins and ultimately cell death (29). The effects of honokiol-induced dysfunction of mitochondria may be exerted in a time-, dosage- and cell type-dependent manner. Although the present study provided critical insight into the apoptosis-inducing effect of honokiol on bladder cancer cells via hyperpolarization of mitochondria and the induction of ROS burst, the synergistic efficacy of honokiol in combination with chemoradiation-based therapies used in bladder cancer treatment requires assessment by further studies. Of note, a limitation of the present study was the lack of cell viability assessment of honokiol-treated normal bladder cells as a safety evaluation. However, a study by Hua et al (30) revealed that only a high concentration (100 µM) of honokiol suppressed the proliferation of normal colon epithelial cells.

In conclusion, the present study suggested that honokiol has potential use as an adjuvant for urothelial bladder cancer treatment. In the future, the detailed underlying mechanisms require to be elucidated and the efficacy requires evaluation in pre-clinical in vivo studies.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Miss Tsu-Yi Yi (Cancer Center, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan) for her technical support.

Funding

The present study was supported by grants from the Research Fund of the Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital (grant nos. DMR-107-153 and DMR-CELL-1809) and the National Science Council of Taiwan (grant no. NSC 105-2320-B-039-068).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed in the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

CHH, CJY, GML and PHS made contributions to the conception and design of the study and prepared the manuscript. CHH, CJY and PHS performed the experiments and data analysis. GML, LML and JWP reviewed the literature and interpreted the results. CHH and PHS revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Glossary

Abbreviations

Abbreviations:

SRB

sulforhodamine B

PI

propidium iodide

DCFH2-DA

2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate

DiOC6

3,3′-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide

ROS

reactive oxygen species

References

1 

American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures. 2018.

2 

Cancer Prevention Group: Annual Report of Taiwan Cancer Registry for 2016. December 27–2018, https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=269&pid=10227

3 

Huang CY, Lin YC, Shiue HS, Chen WJ, Su CT, Pu YS, Ao PL and Hsueh YM: Comparison of arsenic methylation capacity and polymorphisms of arsenic methylation genes between bladder cancer and upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Toxicol Lett. 295:64–73. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Boulanger M, Tual S, Lemarchand C, Guizard AV, Velten M, Marcotullio E, Baldi I, Clin B and Lebailly PP: Agricultural exposure and risk of bladder cancer in the AGRIculture and CANcer cohort. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 90:169–178. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Mendez WM Jr, Eftim S, Cohen J, Warren I, Cowden J, Lee JS and Sams R: Relationships between arsenic concentrations in drinking water and lung and bladder cancer incidence in U.S. counties. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 27:235–243. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Shibata A, Ohneseit PF, Tsai YC, Spruck CH III, Nichols PW, Chiang HS, Lai MK and Jones PA: Mutational spectrum in the p53 gene in bladder tumors from the endemic area of black foot disease in Taiwan. Carcinogenesis. 15:1085–1087. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

NNational Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN GuidelinesÒ). Bladder cancer Version 2.2018. February 7–2018.https://oncolife.com.ua/doc/nccn/Bladder_Cancer.pdf

8 

Shelley MD, Mason MD and Kynaston H: Intravesical therapy for superficial bladder cancer: A systematic review of randomised trials and meta-analyses. Cancer Treat Rev. 36:195–205. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Koga F, Takemura K and Fukushima H: Biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes of chemoradiation-based bladder preservation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 19:E27772018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Rauf A, Patel S, Imran M, Maalik A, Arshad MU, Saeed F, Mabkhot YN, Al-Showiman SS, Ahmad N and Elsharkawy E: Honokiol: An anticancer lignan. Biomed Pharmacother. 107:555–562. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Zubair H, Azim S, Ahmad A, Khan MA, Patel GK, Singh S and Singh AP: Cancer chemoprevention by phytochemicals: Nature's healing touch. Molecules. 22:E3952017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Lee YJ, Lee YM, Lee CK, Jung JK, Han SB and Hong JT: Therapeutic applications of compounds in the magnolia family. Pharmacol Ther. 130:157–176. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Kumar A, Kumar Singh U and Chaudhary A: Honokiol analogs: A novel class of anticancer agents targeting cell signaling pathways and other bioactivities. Future Med Chem. 5:809–829. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Prasad R and Katiyar SK: Honokiol, an active compound of Magnolia plant, inhibits growth, and progression of cancers of different organs. Adv Exp Med Biol. 928:245–265. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Chio CC, Chen KY, Chang CK, Chuang JY, Liu CC, Liu SH and Chen RM: Improved effects of honokiol on temozolomide-induced autophagy and apoptosis of drug-sensitive and -tolerant glioma cells. BMC Cancer. 18:3792018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Chio CC, Tai YT, Mohanraj M, Liu SH, Yang ST and Chen RM: Honokiol enhances temozolomide-induced apoptotic insults to malignant glioma cells via an intrinsic mitochondrion-dependent pathway. Phytomedicine. 49:41–51. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Lai IC, Shih PH, Yao CJ, Yeh CT, Whang-Peng J, Lui TN, Chuang SE, Hu TS, Lai TY and Lai GM: Elimination of cancer stem-like cells and potentiation of temozolomide sensitivity by Honokiol in glioblastoma multiforme cells. PLoS One. 10:e01148302015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Chang MT, Lee SP, Fang CY, Hsieh PL, Liao YW, Lu MY, Tsai LL, Yu CC and Liu CM: Chemosensitizing effect of honokiol in oral carcinoma stem cells via regulation of IL-6/Stat3 signaling. Environ Toxicol. 33:1105–1112. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Zhang Q, Zhao W, Ye C, Zhuang J, Chang C, Li Y, Huang X, Shen L, Li Y, Cui Y, et al: Honokiol inhibits bladder tumor growth by suppressing EZH2/miR-143 axis. Oncotarget. 6:37335–37348. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Shen L, Zhang F, Huang R, Yan J and Shen B: Honokiol inhibits bladder cancer cell invasion through repressing SRC-3 expression and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Oncol Lett. 14:4294–4300. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Vichai V and Kirtikara K: Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay for cytotoxicity screening. Nat Protoc. 1:1112–1116. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Monappa V, Reddy SM and Kudva R: Hematolymphoid neoplasms in effusion cytology. Cytojournal. 15:152018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Danova M, Torchio M, Comolli G, Sbrana A, Antonuzzo A and Mazzini G: The role of automated cytometry in the new era of cancer immunotherapy. Mol Clin Oncol. 9:355–361. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

24 

Li CG, Ni CL, Yang M, Tang YZ, Li Z, Zhu YJ, Jiang ZH, Sun B and Li CJ: Honokiol protects pancreatic beta cell against high glucose and intermittent hypoxia-induced injury by activating Nrf2/ARE pathway in vitro and in vivo. Biomed Pharmacother. 97:1229–1237. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Wang H, Liao Z, Sun X, Shi Q, Huo G, Xie Y, Tang X, Zhi X and Tang Z: Intravenous administration of Honokiol provides neuroprotection and improves functional recovery after traumatic brain injury through cell cycle inhibition. Neuropharmacology. 86:9–21. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Liu JX, Shen SN, Tong Q, Wang YT and Lin LG: Honokiol protects hepatocytes from oxidative injury through mitochondrial deacetylase SIRT3. Eur J Pharmacol. 834:176–187. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Halasi M, Hitchinson B, Shah BN, Váraljai R, Khan I, Benevolenskaya EV, Gaponenko V, Arbiser JL and Gartel AL: Honokiol is a FOXM1 antagonist. Cell Death Dis. 9:842018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Kroemer G, Galluzzi L and Brenner C: Mitochondrial membrane permeabilization in cell death. Physiol Rev. 87:99–163. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Green DR and Llambi F: Cell death signaling. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 7:a0060802015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Hua H, Chen W, Shen L, Sheng Q and Teng L: Honokiol augments the anti-cancer effects of oxaliplatin in colon cancer cells. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 45:773–779. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

May-2019
Volume 17 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Hsiao CH, Yao CJ, Lai GM, Lee LM, Whang‑Peng J and Shih PH: Honokiol induces apoptotic cell death by oxidative burst and mitochondrial hyperpolarization of bladder cancer cells. Exp Ther Med 17: 4213-4222, 2019.
APA
Hsiao, C., Yao, C., Lai, G., Lee, L., Whang‑Peng, J., & Shih, P. (2019). Honokiol induces apoptotic cell death by oxidative burst and mitochondrial hyperpolarization of bladder cancer cells. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 17, 4213-4222. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.7419
MLA
Hsiao, C., Yao, C., Lai, G., Lee, L., Whang‑Peng, J., Shih, P."Honokiol induces apoptotic cell death by oxidative burst and mitochondrial hyperpolarization of bladder cancer cells". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 17.5 (2019): 4213-4222.
Chicago
Hsiao, C., Yao, C., Lai, G., Lee, L., Whang‑Peng, J., Shih, P."Honokiol induces apoptotic cell death by oxidative burst and mitochondrial hyperpolarization of bladder cancer cells". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 17, no. 5 (2019): 4213-4222. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2019.7419