Open Access

CCR3‑shRNA promotes apoptosis and inhibits chemotaxis and degranulation of mouse mast cells

  • Authors:
    • Haisen Peng
    • Bing Liao
    • Xinhua Zhu
    • Yuehui Liu
    • Yinli Jiang
    • Shuhong Wu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: May 12, 2020     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8737
  • Pages: 1030-1038
  • Copyright: © Peng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Mast cells (MCs) are the major effector cells of allergic rhinitis (AR). The present study aimed to investigate the effects of C‑C chemokine receptor type 3 (CCR3) on the proliferation, apoptosis, chemotaxis and activated degranulation of mouse MCs. Mouse bone marrow‑derived MCs were cultured in vitro, purified and identified using toluidine blue staining and flow cytometry. Three different CCR3‑short hairpin (shRNA) lentiviral vectors were constructed and transfected into MCs, and the mRNA and protein expression levels of CCR3 were assessed by reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR and western blotting. Proliferation and apoptosis of the MCs were measured using Cell Counting kit‑8 (CCK‑8) assays and flow cytometry, respectively. MC chemotaxis was assessed by Transwell assay and quantified using flow cytometry. The activation of MC degranulation was examined using ELISAs. The results demonstrated that MCs were appropriately isolated, and identified that CCR3‑shRNA2 presented the higher knockdown effect among the three shRNAs tested. Following 96 h of transfection, the results of CCK‑8 and flow cytometry assays demonstrated that CCR3‑shRNA2 inhibited MC proliferation and promoted MC apoptosis. The results from the Transwell assay indicated that CCR3‑shRNA2 restrained MC chemotaxis, whereas ELISA results demonstrated that CCR3‑shRNA2 suppressed MC degranulation. In conclusion, CCR3‑shRNA2 effectively downregulated CCR3 mRNA and protein expression levels in mouse MCs. In addition, CCR3‑shRNA2 promoted MC apoptosis and suppressed the proliferation, chemotaxis and degranulation of mouse MCs, suggesting that CCR3‑shRNA2 may serve as a therapeutic tool for the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

Introduction

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a type of immunoglobulin (Ig)E-mediated type I allergic disease that affects the nasal mucosa. It is clinically characterized by itching of the nasal passages, sneezing, nasal hypersecretion and nasal mucosal swelling, and 60-70% of patients frequently present with eye itching, reddish eye and/or lacrimation (1). Extensive attention has been paid to the treatment of AR, including antihistamines, glucocorticoids, decongestants and immunotherapy (2); however, favorable therapeutic effects have not been fully achieved due to the diverse pathogenic factors and complex pathogenesis of AR. AR pathogenesis has been the subject of numerous studies (3). In particular, mast cells (MCs), which are the major effector cells of AR, have become an important research topic (4,5).

The RNA interference (RNAi) technique has become a common and effective tool for the study of gene function. This technique typically involves introducing a chemically synthesized small interfering RNA (siRNA) or short hairpin RNA (shRNA) into cells in order to interfere with a target gene, and specifically downregulate its expression (6). C-C chemokine receptor type 3 (CCR3) is a single strand G-protein-coupled receptor containing seven hydrophobic transmembrane domains, which was originally suggested to be specifically expressed on the surfaces of eosinophils (EOSs) (7). Previous studies conducted by the present research team demonstrated that CCR3 downregulation by RNAi markedly alleviated nasal cavity symptoms, significantly reduced CCR3 mRNA expression in the peripheral blood, bone marrow and nasal lavage fluid, and notably decreased EOS infiltration in a mouse model of AR. In addition, degranulated proteins in the EOSs of peripheral blood, bone marrow and nasal lavage fluid were significantly decreased in the AR model mice by CCR3 RNAi, and in vitro experiments revealed that CCR3 downregulation in EOSs promoted apoptosis and inhibited proliferation (8,9). However, other studies have reported that CCR3 is also expressed on the surfaces of Th2 cells (10), MCs (11-13) and basophils (14). Ochi et al (13) demonstrated that human MC progenitors express four chemokine receptors, namely CXCR2, CCR3, CXCR4 and CCR5; however, only CCR3 is maintained until MC maturation. Brightling et al (11) reported that MCs migrate to CCR3, and that the application of a CCR3 inhibition with a specific blocking antibody could significantly reduce the migration of MCs to CCR3. Similarly, Miyazaki et al (15) demonstrated that a CCR3 blockade by mAb or specific CCR3 antagonist was able to reduce the amount of histamine and β hexosaminidase secreted following MC-activated degranulation.

In the present study, CCR3 lentiviral vector plasmids were constructed and transfected into mouse MCs. The efficacy of the transfection was determined by assessing CCR3 mRNA and protein expression in the MCs. Furthermore, the effects of CCR3-shRNA transfection on MC proliferation, apoptosis and chemotaxis were evaluated, in order to provide a theoretical foundation for the further investigation of AR pathogenesis.

Materials and methods

Animals

Male Balb/c mice (n=5; weight 20±2 g; 4-6 weeks old) were purchased from the Laboratory Animal Science Center of Nanchang University. All animals were housed in cages with free access to food and water and were acclimated for 1 week at a controlled temperature of 24˚C and relative humidity of 55-65%, under a 12-h light/dark cycle (lights on at 7:00 a.m.) prior to experimental surgery. All efforts were made to minimize suffering. Animal procedures were conducted according to the Guidelines for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University.

Reagents

Mouse interleukin (IL)-3 and mouse stem cell factor (SCF) were purchased from Promega Corporation. TRIzol reagent (cat. no. CW0580S), Ultrapure RNA extraction kit (cat. no. CW0581M), HiFiScript cDNA synthesis kit (cat. no. CW2569M) and UltraSYBR Mixture (cat. no. CW0957M) were all purchased from Beijing CoWin Biotech Co., Ltd. Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)/propidium iodide (PI) Apoptosis kit (cat. no. AP101-100-kit) was purchased from Hanzhou Multi Sciences (Lianke) Biotech Co., Ltd. RIPA Lysis Buffer (cat. no. C1053) was purchased from Applygen Technologies, Inc. SuperSignal® West Pico chemiluminescent substrate (cat. no. RJ239676) was obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. Polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (cat. no. IPVH0001) were purchased from Merck KGaA. Mouse monoclonal primary antibody against GAPDH (1:2,000; cat. no. TA-08) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse and anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibodies (1:2,000, cat. nos. ZB-2305 and cat. no. ZB-2301, respectively) were purchased from Beijing Zhongshan Jinqiao Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Rabbit monoclonal primary antibody against CCR3 (1:500; cat. no. ab32512) was purchased from Abcam. PE-CD117 (cat. no. 555714) and FITC-FCεRI α (cat. no. 553376) were purchased from Becton Dickinson. Mouse histamine ELISA kit (cat. no. CEA927Ge) was purchased from USCN Life Sciences, Inc. and mouse β-hexosaminidase ELISA kit (cat. no. SBJ-M0352) was purchased from SBJBio.

Culture of mouse bone marrow-derived MCs

BALB/c mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Femurs and tibias were isolated, immersed in 75% ethanol for 5 min and rinsed with PBS. The ends of the femurs and tibias were cut off. Bone marrow was flushed out from the bones using RPMI-1640 and was collected on a plate. A single-cell suspension of bone marrow was subsequently prepared via filtering the bone marrow with a 100-mesh sieve. Cells were collected following centrifugation at 188.9 x g at 4˚C for 5 min and were washed twice with PBS. Subsequently, cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.)., 10 µg/ml streptomycin, 100 IU/ml penicillin, 50 µmol/l non-essential amino acids, 10 ng/ml IL-3 and 10 ng/ml SCF and were placed at 37˚C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2.

Toluidine blue staining

The medium were changed every two days, and the mast cells were detected using Toluidine blue staining. Following 4 weeks of culture, 0.5 ml cell suspension was collected with a Pasteur tube, added dropwise onto an autoclaved cover glass covered with polylysine and then air-dried. Cells were stained with toluidine blue for 15 min at room temperature, washed with water, followed by acetone differentiation, gradual ethanol (95, 85 and 75%) dehydration, xylene hyalinization and neutral resin mounting at room temperature. Slides were imaged using a microscope (CX41; Olympus Corporation; magnification, x200).

Flow cytometry for MC identification

Cells cultured for 4 weeks were collected by horizontal centrifugation (1889 x g; 5 min) at 4˚C, washed twice and resuspended in PBS, resuspended, and the cell concentration was adjusted to 1x106/ml. Cell suspension (100 µl) was put into two tubes, and incubated with 0.5 µl PE-CD117 and 0.2 µl FITC-FCεRI α, the specific MCs markers (16), in the dark at 4˚C for 30 min. A volume of 1 ml PBS containing 2.5% FBS was added into each tube for 30 sec, cells were washed twice in PBS and centrifuged at 188.9 x g for 1 min at 4˚C, and then the supernatant was discarded. Eventually, cells were resuspended in 0.5 ml PBS containing 2.5% FBS. Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (NovoCyte 2060R) with NovoExpress_1.2.5_Setup_Cn_170605.20914 software provided by ACEA Biosciences Inc.

Construction of CCR3-shRNA lentivirus vector

The CCR3 gene-specific mRNA sequence was obtained from the Genebank database (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Subsequently, targeting sequences interfering with the CCR3 gene were searched for using the siRNA online design tool from Ambion; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. (https://www.thermofisher.com/uk/en/home/brands/invitrogen/ambion.html). Three CCR3 target sequences were designed by General Biosystems and screened using Blast (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi; Table I).

Table I

Primer sequences of the CCR3-shRNAs.

Table I

Primer sequences of the CCR3-shRNAs.

Primer nameDirectionPrimer sequences (5'-3')
CCR3-shRNA1Forward GATCCGGCAGCATTGCCTGAATTTATCTTCCTGTCAGAATAAATTCAGGCAATGC
  TGCCTTTTTG
 Reverse AATTCAAAAAGGCAGCATTGCCTGAATTTATTCTGACAGGAAGATAAATTCAGG
  CAATGCTGCCG
CCR3-shRNA2Forward GATCCGCAGCATTGCCTGAATTTATCCTTCCTGTCAGAGATAAATTCAGGCAATG
  CTGCTTTTTG
 Reverse AATTCAAAAAGCAGCATTGCCTGAATTTATCTCTGACAGGAAGGATAAATTCAG
  GCAATGCTGCG
CCR3-shRNA3Forward GATCCGCTCTTCCTCTCCTCATTATGCTTCCTGTCAGACATAATGAGGAGAGGAA
  GAGCTTTTTG
 Reverse ATTCAAAAAGCTCTTCCTCTCCTCATTATGTCTGACAGGAAGCATAATGAGGAG
  AGGAAGAGCG

[i] CCR3, C-C chemokine receptor type 3; shRNA, short hairpin RNA.

Cell transfection

MC cells were seeded in a 24-well plate at a density of 1x105/well and grown at 37˚C for 18-24 h prior to lentivirus transfection. On the second day, the medium was replaced by 2 ml fresh medium containing 6 µg/ml polybrene and 10 µl virus suspension, and cells were incubated at 37˚C for 4 h. After 4 h incubation at 37˚C with the vectors, 2 ml fresh medium was added to dilute the polybrene and the cells were further cultured for 72, 96 and 144 h, and virus-containing medium was replaced by the fresh medium in the blank control group, vector control group and CCR3-shRNA group.

Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA from each group of cells was isolated using TRIzol (cat. no. CW0580S; CoWin Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg total RNA using an HiFiScript cDNA synthesis kit (cat. no. CW2569M; CoWin Biosciences) following the manufacturer's instructions. The thermal conditions of reverse transcription were as follows: 37˚C for 15 min and 85˚C for 5 sec. qPCR analysis was then performed to evaluate CCR3 mRNA expression using UltraSYBR mixture (cat. no. CW0957M; CoWin Biosciences). The primers were designed as follows: CCR3, forward 5'-CGCTATCCAGAGGGTGAAG-3' and reverse 5'-AGCAGTGGGTGTAGGCAAT-3' (predicted amplicon length, 328 bp); and GAPDH, forward 5'-AAGAAGGTGGTGAAGCAGG-3' and reverse 5'-GAAGGTGGAAGAGTGGGAGT-3' (predicted amplicon length, 111 bp). The qPCR cycles were performed as follows: 94˚C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95˚C for 15 sec, 58˚C for 30 sec and 72˚C for 30 sec, and a final extension at 72˚C for 10 min. The relative expression level of CCR3 was normalized to endogenous control GAPDH and was expressed as 2-ΔΔCT (17).

Western blotting

Cells in each group were lysed using RIPA buffer on the ice for 30 min and the protein concentration was estimated using a bicinchoninic acid assay kit. Proteins (60 µg) were boiled at 95˚C for 5 min in 500 µl NuPAGE 4X LDS sample buffer (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) containing 5% β-mercaptoethanol. Subsequently, proteins (60 µg/lane) were separated using 10% NuPAGE Bis-Tris precast gels (Nanjing KeyGen Biotech Co., Ltd) and transferred onto PVDF membranes. Membranes were washed with TBS supplemented with 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST), blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (Applygen Technologies, Inc.) in TBST for 2 h at room temperature, and incubated at 4˚C overnight with anti-CCR3 and anti-GAPDH primary antibodies. Following three washes of 10 min with TBST, membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature. After three washes of 5 min with TBST, the signal on the membrane was detected using SuperSignal® West Pico chemiluminescent substrate (cat. no. RJ239676; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and imaged with a ChemiDoc system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). The data were analyzed via densitometry using ImageJ software 1.8.0 (National Institutes of Health) and normalized to expression of the internal control GAPDH.

Detection of MC proliferation with Cell Counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay

Cells in each group were collected following 96 h transfection, washed twice with PBS, and seeded in a 96-well plate at a density of 2.5x105/ml. Then, 100 µl culture medium (RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS) was added to each well (in pentaplicate for each group) and cells were cultured at 37˚C for 0, 12, 48, 72 and 96 h. CCK8 reagent (20 µl; Nanjing KeyGen Biotech Co., Ltd) was then added to each well and cells were incubated at 37˚C for 4 h. Absorbance at 450 nm was then measured using a microplate reader.

Flow cytometry for detection of MC apoptosis

Cells were collected following 96 h transfection, and the cell concentration was adjusted to 2.0x105/ml. Cell suspension from each group was centrifuged (698.8 x g, 3 min) at 4˚C and the supernatant was discarded. PBS (300 µl) was then added to each tube and the mixture was gently mixed. Subsequently, 5 µl Annexin V-FITC and 5 µl PI were added to each tube and cells were incubated in the dark at room temperature for 10 min. Cells were then transferred into special centrifuge tube for flow apoptosis detection, and apoptosis was eventually detected using a flow cytometer (NovoCyte 2060R) and analyzed with NovoExpress_1.2.5_Setup_Cn_170605.20914 software provided by ACEA Biosciences Inc.

Transwell assay for detection of MC chemotaxis

Cells were collected following 96 h transfection, centrifuged (111.8 x g; 5 min) at room temperature and washed twice with PBS. Cells in each group were resuspended in medium containing 10% FBS and the concentration was adjusted to 2.0x105/ml. Medium containing 10% FBS (800 µl in total) and 1 nM chemokines leukotriene B4 (LTB4; cat. no. 71160-24-2; Hubei Jusheng Technology Co. Ltd.) (12) were added to each well of a 24-well plate to evaluate the chemotaxis of MCs. Chambers (pore size 8 µm; BD Biosciences) were placed inside the wells, 200 µl cell suspension from each group was added into the chambers and cells were cultured at 37˚C for 36 h. MCs were the suspended cells, which did not adhere to the filter membrane. Flow cytometry was subsequently used to detect the number MCs that had migrated into the lower chamber. Subsequently, the chambers were removed and the medium contained in the 24-well plate was collected and centrifuged at 1,889.4 x g at room temperature for 5 min before discarding the supernatant. Gr-1-FITC (5 µl) (BD Biosciences) and C-kit PE (5 µl) (BD Biosciences) were then added into each tube and the mixture was gently mixed and incubated in the dark for 10 min at room temperature to detect chemotaxis (18). The single-cell suspension obtained was then transferred into the special flow cytometry centrifuge tube and analyzed by using a flow cytometer (NovoCyte 2060R) and analyzed with NovoExpress_1.2.5_Setup_Cn_170605.20914 software (ACEA Biosciences Inc.). C-kit positive cells were considered to represent the number of MCs cells that had migrated.

Detection of MC degranulation by ELISA

MC degranulation was evaluated using β-hexosaminidase and Histamine detection. Cells were collected following 96 h transfection, centrifuged at 4˚C (111.8 x g; 5 min) and washed twice with PBS. Cells were resuspended in medium containing 10% FBS and the concentration was adjusted to 5.0x106/ml and seeded into 24-well plate (in sextaplicate for each group). Subsequently, 10 µg/ml anti-DNP IgE (19) was added into each well for 1 h at 37˚C to promote the MCs activation and degranulation. Then, 40 ng/ml HSA-DNP was added for 1 h at 37˚C to simulate the sensitization process and trigger allergic reactions. Subsequently, plates were placed on ice for 10 min in order to terminate the degranulation reaction, and centrifuged at 4˚C (1,889.4 x g; 5 min) to collect the supernatants from each well. Then, 50 µl of 1 mM 4-nitrophenyl-N-acetyl β-D-glucoside (dissolved into 100 mM citric acid-sodium citrate, pH 4.4) was added to each supernatant, and the mixture was transferred into a 96-well plate and incubated for 1 h at 37˚C. Sodium carbonate buffer solution (200 µl) was then added to terminate the reaction. Absorbance was read at 405 nm using a microplate reader, and the amount of β-hexosaminidase and Histamine was expressed as its proportion of total enzymes in the unstimulated cells (20).

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using SPSS 19.0 software (IBM Corp.). Data are expressed as the means ± standard deviation. Multiple group comparison was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. Each experiment was repeated three times independently. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Identification of MCs

MCs were identified through toluidine blue staining following 4 weeks of culture of the primary MCs, since there are substances in the cytoplasm of MCs, such as heparin and histamine, that create a metachromatic purple stain when they are treated with toluidine blue (21) (Fig. 1A). The results in Fig. 1B demonstrated that 97.42% of the cells were positively stained for the cell surface antigens CD117 and FCεRI α. These results indicate that MCs were successfully induced.

Screening of CCR3-shRNA effects

As presented in Fig. 2, the three CCR3-shRNAs significantly reduced CCR3 mRNA expression compared with that in the control cells. In addition, CCR3-shRNA2 appeared to have the strongest CCR3 downregulating effect and was therefore selected for subsequent experiments. Statistical analysis was not performed statistical analysis between the three groups. The CCR3-shRNA2 downregulated CCR3 expression the most as shown in Fig. 2 and was thus selected for the following experiments.

CCR3-shRNA2 transfection efficiency and determination of the optimum transfection time

CCR3 expression at the mRNA and protein levels were detected at 72, 96 and 144 h post transfection with CCR3-shRNA2. The results in Fig. 3 suggest that CCR3 mRNA and protein expression levels in cells transfected with CCR3-shRNA2 were significantly reduced at each time point compared with the control group. In addition, the CCR3 expression in the CCR3-shRNA2 group at 96 h was significantly lower compared with that at 72 and 144 h (P<0.05). The transfection time of 96 h was therefore selected for subsequent experiments.

CCR3-shRNA2 transfection decreases MC proliferation

CCK-8 assay was used to determine the effect of CCR3-shRNA2 transfection on proliferation. As presented in Fig. 4, cells in each group proliferated in a time dependent manner. However, compared with the control group, CCR3-shRNA transfection significantly reduced the cell proliferation at each time point after 12 h (P<0.05). These findings demonstrated that CCR3 downregulation decreased MC cell proliferation.

CCR3-shRNA2 transfection promotes MC apoptosis

Following 96 h of cell transfection with CCR3-shRNA2, apoptosis was assessed by flow cytometry using AnnexinV-FITC/PI staining. As presented in Fig. 5, apoptosis in the CCR3-shRNA2 group was significantly increased compared with that in the control group (P<0.05). This result indicates that CCR3 downregulation promoted apoptosis in MCs.

CCR3-shRNA2 transfection decreases MC chemotaxis

The migration of MCs towards the chemokine LTB4 was detected using a Transwell assay. The results in Fig. 6 demonstrate that MC chemotaxis was significantly reduced following CCR3-shRNA2 transfection (P<0.05).

CCR3-shRNA2 transfection decreases the degranulation of MCs

Histamine and β-hexosaminidase are granules synthesized by MCs. They are important markers of MC degranulation (22). ELISAs were performed to detect the histamine and β-hexosaminidase release rate during MC degranulation. The results in Fig. 7 demonstrate that the release of histamine and β-hexosaminidase into the supernatant by CCR3-shRNA2 transfected MCs was significantly reduced compared with that of control cells (P<0.05).

Discussion

MCs were first isolated by Ehrlich et al from blood samples and connective tissue in 1878(23). Since then, MCs have been considered as the major effector cells in allergic diseases, including asthma, atopic dermatitis and AR (5,24). The binding of antigen-specific IgE to FCεRI to sensitize MCs has been convincingly linked to the pathophysiology of anaphylaxis and other acute allergic reactions (25). MCs originate from bone marrow-derived pluripotent hematopoietic cells and circulate as immature precursors. However, after entering tissues, they develop into functional MCs via multiple signals that prompt their proliferation and differentiation (26,27). SCF and IL-3 are the most important stimulating factors for MC maturation. IL-3 is also called the polyclonal colony stimulating factor, and is the most potent cytokine able to promote early-stage mouse MC differentiation (28). SCF maintains MC survival and promotes MC proliferation, and its concentration will directly affect the number of MCs in the circulation and tissues, In addition, SCF can assist IL-3-mediated MC differentiation and serves a key role in late stage MC maturation (29). At present, SCF and IL-3 are frequently used to induce the differentiation of mouse bone marrow-derived MCs; however, the concentration of each factor used varies between studies. In the present study, the concentration of 10 ng/ml was used for both factors, medium was replaced every 7 days, and cells were identified 4 weeks after the induction of differentiation through toluidine blue staining and flow cytometry. The flow cytometry results demonstrated that >97% cells were positively stained for CC117 and FCεRI, confirming that the purity of MCs obtained was high. With regards to the role of MCs in AR, Lin et al (30) investigated a mouse mode of AR and the results from toluidine blue staining of the nasal mucosa suggested that MC infiltration was significantly increased; furthermore, the concentrations of specific IgE and histamine in peripheral blood and IL-4, IL-9 and IL-17 in nasal lavage fluid were significantly increased compared with those in normal controls. In addition, following downregulation of potassium calcium-activated channel subfamily N member 4 (KCa3.1) expression using a lentivirus vector plasmid, the symptoms of AR in the AR model mice were markedly ameliorated, MC infiltration into the nasal mucosa was reduced, and the concentrations of specific IgE and histamine in peripheral blood and of IL-4, IL-9 and IL-17 in nasal lavage fluid were significantly decreased. Furthermore, in vitro experiments demonstrated that KCA3.1 downregulation in the MC cell line P815 significantly downregulated MC degranulation and IL-6 and IL-8 release (30). Shao et al (31) used the traditional Chinese medicine Shenqi in AR mice and the MC cell line RBL-2H3, and reported that this treatment could regulate MC degranulation and treat AR. Zhang et al (32) described similar results using the traditional Chinese medicine curcumin. These findings suggest that MC proliferation, local infiltration and degranulation serve key roles in the pathogenesis of AR. Reducing MC proliferation, infiltration and degranulation, and promoting MC apoptosis might therefore be crucial in the treatment of AR.

Previous studies conducted by the present research team demonstrated that CCR3 downregulation can promote eosinophil apoptosis, and suppress the proliferation and degranulation of eosinophils, which could therefore be used to treat AR (8,9). However, the role of the CCR3 gene in MCs proliferation or apoptosis remains controversial (12,33). Collington et al (12) compared bone marrow-derived MCs from CCR3 knockout and wild-type mice, and reported that CCR3 knockout mice shared a similar MC phenotype with wild-type mice, and that both MC types had similar migratory capacity towards the chemokines LTB4 and SCF, suggesting that the CCR3 gene has no influence on mouse MC chemotaxis. Furthermore, Brightling et al (11) demonstrated that MCs can migrate towards CCR3 chemokine, and that the use of CCR3 inhibitor can markedly decrease the migratory capacity of MCs towards this chemokine. Miyazaki et al (15) reported that the histamine and β-hexosaminidase release following MC degranulation in CCR3 gene knockout mice was significantly decreased, suggesting that the role of CCR3 gene in MC degranulation remains unclear. The present study demonstrated that MC proliferation was significantly decreased following CCR3 downregulation in mouse-derived MCs compared with the control group. In addition, the migratory capacity of CRR3-shRNA transfected MCs towards the chemokine LTB4 was also significantly reduced compared with the control group, indicating that CCR3 interference could reduce MC proliferation and chemotaxis. HSA-DNP and anti-DNP IgE were used to activate MCs proliferation, in order to assess MC degranulation. The results demonstrated that the levels of histamine and β-hexosaminidase release following MC degranulation were significantly decreased in the CCR3-shRNA transfected MC group compared with the control group, suggesting that CCR3 interference may suppress MC degranulation. Furthermore, the results of flow cytometry and CCK-8 assays demonstrated that CCR3 interference may promote MC apoptosis and reduce MC proliferation.

This study exhibits some limitations. Firstly, as the study was only restricted to the in vitro detection of MC function, the results should be further verified using in vivo experiments. Secondly, the study only determined the effect of MC phenotype and CCR3 function on MC chemotaxis and degranulation, and the mechanisms involved were not evaluated. Future investigation will therefore focus on the underlying mechanisms of CCR3.

In conclusion, CCR3 interference may promote MC apoptosis and reduce MC proliferation, chemotaxis and degranulation, thereby alleviating the MC-mediated allergic inflammatory reaction observed in AR. To the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to investigate the effect of CCR3 interference on MCs and to explore the roles of CCR3 and MCs in the pathogenesis of AR. The findings from this study may provide a theoretical basis for the use of CCR3 as a potential target in the treatment of AR and lay a favorable foundation for further investigation.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81560171) and the Talent Team Project of Jiangxi Province (grant no. 20161BCB24010).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

HP isolated the cells from mouse, cultured cells and performed cell biology experiments. BL performed plasmid construction. XZ designed this study and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. YL performed plasmid transfection and identification. YJ analyzed the data. SW contributed to the design of the study and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All of the animal procedures were conducted in accordance with the Guidelines for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Bousquet J, Schunemann HJ, Hellings PW, Arnavielhe S, Bachert C, Bedbrook A, Bergmann KC, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Brozek J, Calderon M, et al: MACVIA clinical decision algorithm in adolescents and adults with allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 138:367–374.e2. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Utomo BSR, Hatta M, Sirait RH, Pratiwi S and Massi MN: The role of cytokine interleukin-2, transcription factor of FoxP3 in the immunological regulation of allergic rhinitis. Int J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 7:7–19. 2017.

3 

Eifan AO and Durham SR: Pathogenesis of rhinitis. Clin Exp Allergy. 46:1139–1151. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Im YS, Lee B, Kim EY, Min JH, Song DU, Lim JM, Eom JW, Cho HJ, Sohn Y and Jung HS: Antiallergic effect of gami-hyunggyeyeongyotang on ovalbumin-induced allergic rhinitis in mouse and human mast cells. J Chin Med Assoc. 79:185–194. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Modena BD, Dazy K and White AA: Emerging concepts: Mast cell involvement in allergic diseases. Transl Res. 174:98–121. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Ma J, Song Y, Wu B, Jiang M, Li K, Zhu C and Wen F: Production of transgenic rice new germplasm with strong resistance against two isolations of Rice stripe virus by RNA interference. Transgenic Res. 20:1367–1377. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Liu Y, Zhu X and Zhang H: Effects of chemokine receptor 3 gene silencing by RNA interference on eosinophils. Exp Ther Med. 13:215–221. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Zhu XH, Liao B, Liu K and Liu YH: Effect of RNA interference therapy on the mice eosinophils CCR3 gene and granule protein in the murine model of allergic rhinitis. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 7:226–230. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Zhu XH, Liao B, Xu Y, Liu K, Huang Y, Huang QL and Liu YH: Downregulation of mouse CCR3 by lentiviral shRNA inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of mouse eosinophils. Mol Med Rep. 15:696–702. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Andalib A, Doulabi H, Maracy MR, Rezaei A and Hasheminia SJ: CCR3, CCR4, CCR5, and CXCR3 expression in peripheral blood CD4+ lymphocytes in gastric cancer patients. Adv Biomed Res. 2(31)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Brightling CE, Kaur D, Berger P, Morgan AJ, Wardlaw AJ and Bradding P: Differential expression of CCR3 and CXCR3 by human lung and bone marrow-derived mast cells: Implications for tissue mast cell migration. J Leukoc Biol. 77:759–766. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Collington SJ, Westwick J, Williams TJ and Weller CL: The function of CCR3 on mouse bone marrow-derived mast cells in vitro. Immunology. 129:115–124. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Ochi H, Hirani WM, Yuan Q, Friend DS, Austen KF and Boyce JA: T helper cell type 2 cytokine-mediated comitogenic responses and CCR3 expression during differentiation of human mast cells in vitro. J Exp Med. 190:267–280. 1999.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Khanolkar A, Burden SJ, Hansen B, Wilson AR, Philipps GJ and Hill HR: Evaluation of CCR3 as a basophil activation marker. Am J Clin Pathol. 140:293–300. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Miyazaki D, Nakamura T, Ohbayashi M, Kuo CH, Komatsu N, Yakura K, Tominaga T, Inoue Y, Higashi H, Murata M, et al: Ablation of type I hypersensitivity in experimental allergic conjunctivitis by eotaxin-1/CCR3 blockade. Int Immunol. 21:187–201. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Zhang WN, Wu K, Zhou HM, Peng QZ, He WT, Gao Y, Lin XG, Fang ZM and Chen ZH: Cultivation and identification of bone marrow mast cells in mouse. J Intern Intensive Med. 15:42–44. 2009.

17 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Vink E, Willemien V, Michiel V, Wilko S, Evert-Jan V, Blankestijn P, Yao Y, Harrison J, Davis G and Sammut I: Novel invasive strategies in antihypertensive treatment-Renal sympathetic denervation, baroreflex stimulation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 27 (Suppl 2)(ii38)2012.

19 

Varga JM, Kalchschmid G, Klein GF and Fritsch P: Mechanism of allergic cross-reactions-I. Multispecific binding of ligands to a mouse monoclonal anti-DNP IgE antibody. Mol Immunol. 28:641–654. 1991.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Bojarová P, Bruthans J and Křen V: β-N-Acetylhexosaminidases-the wizards of glycosylation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 103:7869–7881. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Dahal BK, Kosanovic D, Messinger J, Fischer Y, Hoffmann K, Antel J, Husen B, Hanke N, Mayet S and Ghofrani HA: Role of mast cells and chymase in pulmonary vascular remodeling. Eur Respir J. 38(1524)2011.

22 

Zudaire E, Martínez A, Garayoa M, Pío R, Kaur G, Woolhiser MR, Metcalfe DD, Hook WA, Siraganian RP and Guise TA: Adrenomedullin is a cross-talk molecule that regulates tumor and mast cell function during human carcinogenesis. Am J Pathol. 168:280–291. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Fisher ER: Tissue mast cells. J Am Med Assoc. 173:171–173. 1960.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Krystel-Whittemore M, Dileepan KN and Wood JG: Mast cell: A multi-functional master cell. Front Immunol. 6:1–12. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Galli SJ and Tsai M: IgE and mast cells in allergic disease. Nat Med. 18(693)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Ribatti D: The development of human mast cells. An historical reappraisal. Exp Cell Res. 342:210–215. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Schmetzer O, Valentin P, Church MK, Maurer M and Siebenhaar F: Murine and human mast cell progenitors. Eur J Pharmacol. 778:2–10. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Desai A, Jung MY, Olivera A, Gilfillan AM, Prussin C, Kirshenbaum AS, Beaven MA and Metcalfe DD: IL-6 promotes an increase in human mast cell numbers and reactivity through suppression of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 137:1863–1871.e6. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Bérard F, Ferrier Le Bouëdec MC, Bouillet L, Reguiai Z, Barbaud A, Cambazard F, Milpied B, Pelvet B, Kasujee I and Gharbi H: Omalizumab in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria nonresponsive to H1-antihistamine treatment: Results of the phase IV open-label SUNRISE study. Br J Dermatol. 180:56–66. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Lin H, Zheng CQ, Li J, Yang C and Hu L: Lentiviral shRNA against KCa3.1 inhibits allergic response in allergic rhinitis and suppresses mast cell activity via PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Sci Rep. 5(13127)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Shao YY, Zhou YM, Hu M, Li JZ, Chen CJ, Wang YJ, Shi XY, Wang WJ and Zhang TT: The Anti-allergic rhinitis effect of traditional Chinese medicine of shenqi by regulating mast cell degranulation and Th1/Th2 cytokine balance. Molecules. 22(pii: E504)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Zhang N, Li H, Jia JH and He MQ: Anti-inflammatory effect of curcumin on mast cell-mediated allergic responses in ovalbumin-induced allergic rhinitis mouse. Cell Immunol. 298:88–95. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Gangwar RS, Landolina N, Arpinati L and Levi-Schaffer F: Mast cell and eosinophil surface receptors as targets for anti-allergic therapy. Pharmacol Ther. 170:37–63. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August-2020
Volume 20 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Peng H, Liao B, Zhu X, Liu Y, Jiang Y and Wu S: CCR3‑shRNA promotes apoptosis and inhibits chemotaxis and degranulation of mouse mast cells. Exp Ther Med 20: 1030-1038, 2020.
APA
Peng, H., Liao, B., Zhu, X., Liu, Y., Jiang, Y., & Wu, S. (2020). CCR3‑shRNA promotes apoptosis and inhibits chemotaxis and degranulation of mouse mast cells. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 20, 1030-1038. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8737
MLA
Peng, H., Liao, B., Zhu, X., Liu, Y., Jiang, Y., Wu, S."CCR3‑shRNA promotes apoptosis and inhibits chemotaxis and degranulation of mouse mast cells". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 20.2 (2020): 1030-1038.
Chicago
Peng, H., Liao, B., Zhu, X., Liu, Y., Jiang, Y., Wu, S."CCR3‑shRNA promotes apoptosis and inhibits chemotaxis and degranulation of mouse mast cells". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 20, no. 2 (2020): 1030-1038. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8737