Open Access

Comparison of oral and nasal immunization with inactivated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus on intestinal immunity in piglets

  • Authors:
    • En Zhang
    • Jialu Wang
    • Yuchen Li
    • Lulu Huang
    • Yongheng Wang
    • Qian Yang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: June 3, 2020     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8828
  • Pages: 1596-1606
  • Copyright: © Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) has proven to be a major problem for the porcine industry worldwide. Conventional injectable vaccines induce effective systemic immune responses but are less effective in preventing PEDV at mucosal invasion sites, including the nasal or oral mucosa. Additionally, antigens delivered orally are easily degraded. Nasal immunization induces intestinal mucosal immune responses, which can aid in blocking viral invasion, and requires fewer antigen inoculation doses. Therefore, nasal immunizations are considered to be a potential approach to overcome viral infections. In the present study, nasal immunization of piglets was performed using inactivated PEDV combined with Bacillus subtilis as an immunopotentiator and the efficacy of nasal immunization was assessed. The results demonstrated that compared with oral immunization, piglets from the nasal immunization group exhibited higher levels of neutralizing antibodies (P<0.01) in the intestine, PEDV‑specific immunoglobulin (Ig)G (P<0.01) in serum and PEDV‑specific secretory IgA (SIgA) in saliva (P<0.01) and nasal secretions (P<0.01). An increased number of intestinal CD3+ T cells, IgA‑secreting cells and intraepithelial lymphocytes (P<0.05) were also observed. Furthermore, the protein expression levels of interleukin‑6 and interferon‑γ, relative to the control PEDV infection, were also significantly elevated (P<0.05). The results of the present study indicate that nasal immunization is more effective at inducing the intestinal mucosal immune response, and provide new insights into a novel vaccination strategy that may be used to decrease the incidence of PEDV infections.

Introduction

Porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) is an acute and highly contagious disease, which is characterized by vomiting, diarrhea, dehydration and a high mortality rate in neonatal piglets (1). PED was first observed in 1971 and caused substantial economic losses to the pig industry (2). As the causative agent, PED virus (PEDV) exclusively infects and replicates in the villous enterocytes of the small intestine (3). Currently available PEDV vaccines are administered via intramuscular or subcutaneous injection and induce a systemic immunoglobulin (Ig)G response (4). However, serum IgG is not effective in preventing PEDV infection in the intestinal mucosa (4,5). Studies have demonstrated that secretory IgA (SIgA), a dominant antibody in the intestinal mucosal immune responses, inhibits the invasion of enteric pathogens (6). Consequently, determining how to induce the intestinal mucosal immune response and promote the production of SIgA in the intestinal mucosa is important for the prevention and control of PEDV.

Oral immunization has previously been considered to be an effective strategy for inducing intestinal mucosal immunity (7). However, a large quantity of the antigen is often lost due to gastric acid and protease-mediated degradation within the gastrointestinal tract, thereby leading to poor protection against PEDV infection (8). A recent study indicated that airborne transmission was a major route of PEDV invasion (9). Compared with oral immunization, nasal immunization is more convenient and may overcome the challenge of degradation or clearance. According to the theory of the common mucosal immune system, nasal vaccinations could induce immune responses not only in the local mucosal site but also in other mucosal sites (10). A previous study demonstrated that nasal vaccinations can generate IgA antibody-secreting cells and IgG antibody-secreting cells in the intestine (11,12). Therefore, the nasal cavity may be a new target for inducing the intestinal mucosal immune response against PEDV infection.

Currently, a live-attenuated PED vaccine is used. Although live attenuated vaccines can induce a strong antibody response, live viruses are unsafe and risk reverting to a higher virulence (13). Inactivated viruses are safe but are usually not sufficiently effective in inducing the local immune responses that are necessary for preventing infectious diseases when used alone (14). Therefore, inactivated viruses often require an appropriate immunopotentiator capable of adequately strengthening the immune response. Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) is a gram-positive nonpathogenic and endospore-forming bacterium species that is prevalent worldwide (15). B. subtilis has been used as an additive when feeding animals in the pig industry (16). Previous studies have demonstrated that B. subtilis exhibits a significant immunopotentiating effect that leads to an enhanced mucosal immune response (17,18).

In the present study, the immune responses after nasal immunization with inactivated PEDV combined with B. subtilis were evaluated in piglets. The results revealed that nasal immunization could induce the immune response in the local nasal mucosa and in the intestinal mucosa. Compared with oral immunization, piglets receiving nasal immunization exhibited higher SIgA levels and an increased number of immune cells in the intestine. The results of the present study demonstrate a convenient and effective strategy for PEDV prevention and provide information regarding the common mucosal immune system in pigs.

Materials and methods

Probiotics, virus and animals

The B. subtilis strain was maintained at -70˚C by the present laboratory. The strains were grown in Luria-Bertani broth containing 50 µg/ml kanamycin. PEDV Zhejiang08 strain was provided by the Veterinary Medicine Research Center (Beijing Da Bei Nong Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd.). This strain has been successfully attenuated and can induce a classical cytopathic effect in Vero E6 cells (19). PEDV was amplified in Vero cells in DMEM (Wisent Biotechnology) containing 2% FBS at 37˚C in 5% CO2 for 60 h. And then condensed by high-speed centrifugation (100,000 x g at 4˚C for 2.5 h). Protein concentrations were confirmed using bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assays and the inactivated PEDV was diluted to a concentration of up to 100 µg/100 µl in LB broth. In the present study, the PEDV was placed in a 6-cm plate and illuminated for 12 h using a UV lamp. A total of 24, 0-day-old specific pathogen free (SPF) Duroc Landrace Yorkshire (DLY) piglets (12 males; 12 females; mean body weight ~1.5 kg) were provided by the Institute of Veterinary Research, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Colostrum was not provided to the piglets. The piglets were kept in individual cages and food and water were given ad libitum under the same standard conditions at 12 h light/dark cycles. The temperature of the cages was 30˚C in the first week and kept 26˚C in the subsequent weeks of the experimental period. The relative humidity of the atmosphere was maintained at 70%.

Antibodies

Goat anti-pig IgA (1:100; cat. no. ab112639) and rabbit anti-pig CD3 (SP7) (1:100; cat. no. ab16669) monoclonal antibodies were purchased from Abcam. The streptavidin-biotin complex (SABC) kit (Wuhan Boster Biological Technology, Ltd), including biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (cat. no. sa1022), biotinylated rabbit anti-goat IgG antibodies (cat. no. sa1023) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled SABC, was purchased from Boster Biological Technology. The 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) HRP Color Development kit (cat. no. ar1022) was also purchased from Boster Biological Technology.

Experimental design and collection of samples

A total of 24 SPF DLY piglets, born on the same day, were raised in individual cages with high sanitary conditions. They were weighed and randomly assigned to four groups, each group containing 6 piglets. All piglets were first immunized at 5 days of age and were given a booster immunization at 12 days of age. The groups established were as follows: i) Control group, oral immunization with 1,100 µl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS); ii) inactivated PEDV group, oral immunization with 100 µl inactivated PEDV (100 µg/dose) combined with 1 ml PBS; iii) oral-PB group, oral immunization with 100 µl inactivated PEDV (100 µg/dose) combined with 1x109 colony-forming units (CFU) B. subtilis; and iv) nasal-PB group, nasal immunization with 100 µl inactivated PEDV (100 µg/dose) combined with 1x109 CFU of B. subtilis.

The piglets were fasted for 3 h before each sample collection. Collection of each sample was performed between 10:00 and 11:00 a.m. before feeding. For the detection of IgG antibody levels in the serum, 2 ml blood sample was collected from the precaval vein, once a week on days 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 after the initial immunization. Serum was collected after centrifugation at 13,000 x g for 20 min at 4˚C and stored at -70˚C. Saliva as well as nasal and anal secretions were also collected on days 0, 7, 14, 21 and 28 after the initial immunization using cotton swabs. Piglets were fasted for 3 h before saliva collection. Saliva was collected using a cotton swab that was bitten by the piglets three times. Nasal secretions were collected using cotton swabs that were inserted 1.5 cm into the nose. Anal samples were collected using cotton swabs that were inserted 4 cm into the rectum. Subsequently, the collected samples were rapidly diluted in 800 µl PBS, vortexed for 30 sec, centrifuged at 3,000 x g at 4˚C for 10 min and stored at -70˚C for ELISA detection. Piglets were euthanized by the intravenous injection of sodium pentobarbital (100 mg/kg) at 33 days of age. The pigs were confirmed dead when the corneal reflex disappeared, breathing stopped and the heart stopped beating. Fresh intestines were rinsed using 1 ml DMEM (Wisent Biotechnology) prior to analysis in the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT). A portion of small intestine tissue was fixed in Bouin's fluid (picric acid, 4% paraformaldehyde, glacial acetic acid) at room temperature for 24 h for staining and another small intestine portion was collected and stored at -70˚C for cytokine detection. All animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Animal Experiments of the College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University. All animal care and use were conducted in strict accordance with the Animal Research Committee guidelines of the College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University.

ELISA for PEDV-specific SIgA in the local mucosa and IgG in the serum

The protein concentration of serum and the supernatant of mucosal secretions were measured using a BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The PEDV-specific antibody levels were detected using ELISA. Briefly, ELISA plates were coated in PEDV, 2 µg purified PEDV/well, at 4˚C overnight. The plates were washed with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20 (PBS-T) to remove the virus. After virus removal, plates were blocked for 2 h at 37˚C with 3% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA) dissolved in PBS. Subsequently, 1:100 dilutions of serum samples or 1:2 dilutions of lavage fluid from small intestines, were added to the plates and incubated at 37˚C for 1.5 h. The plates were washed with PBST and then 100 µl of HRP-conjugated goat anti-pig IgA antibody (1:2,000; cat. no. ab112746; Abcam) was added and the plates were incubated at 37˚C for 1 h. Plates were washed 5 times and incubated with 3,3'- and 5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) at 37˚C for 15 min. The reaction was then stopped with 2M sulfuric acid and the absorbance was read at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Tecan Group, Ltd.).

PRNT for the PEDV neutralizing antibody

PRNT was performed as described in a previous study (8). Fresh intestinal samples were rinsed three times with 1 ml DMEM. DMEM containing intestine washing liquid was centrifuged at 14,600 x g at 4˚C for 15 min to remove the feces. The intestine washing liquid was then serially diluted two-fold in DMEM. PEDV PRNT was performed in monolayers of Vero cells (1.0x106 cells/ml) in DMEM containing 10% FBS in 12-well plates. In brief, log dilutions (1:16, 1:32 and 1:64) of intestinal washing liquid (450 µl) were `incubated with 50 µl 1x103 plaque-forming units of PEDV at 37˚C for 1 h. The 500 µl virus/intestinal sample mixture was then transferred onto Vero cell monolayers and incubated at 37˚C for 1 h. The cell monolayers were washed with DMEM and overlaid with 0.9% low-melting agarose at 37˚C in 5% CO2 for 72 h. Plaques were visualized by staining the monolayer with 0.5% crystal violet. Plaque images were acquired under ultraviolet radiation light in Tanon 5200 Automatic Chemiluminescence/Fluorescence Image Analysis system (Tanon Science and Technology Co., Ltd,).

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining for intestine intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) and Peyer's patches

Intestinal tissues were fixed in Bouin's fluid at room temperature for 24 h and then dehydrated through a serial alcohol gradient (75% overnight, 85% for 1 h, 95% for 1 h and 100% for 2 h), washed with xylene (5 min) at room temperature and finally embedded in paraffin. The embedded intestinal tissues were cut into 5-µm serial sections and placed on glass slides. Methods of revealing intraepithelial lymphocytes by H&E staining have been previously reported (17). Before staining, paraffin sections were dewaxed in xylene at room temperature for 15 min, rehydrated through decreasing concentrations of ethanol (100% for 2 min, 95% for 1 min, 85% for 1 min and 75% for 1 min) and rinsed in PBS for 2 min at room temperature. Following the hydration of paraffin sections through decreasing concentrations of ethanol, H&E staining was conducted using hematoxylin (0.5% for 20 sec) and eosin (0.5% for 5 sec) at room temperature. After staining, sections were dehydrated through increasing concentrations of ethanol (75% for 1 min, 85% for 1 min, 95% for 1 min, and 100% for 2 min) and xylene (10 min) at room temperature, and finally sealed with a coverslip. IELs were measured by counting ≥500 nuclei (epithelial and lymphocyte) and the results expressed as IEL/100 epithelial cells (20). In the present study, 10 fields of view were randomly selected from each group and three intestinal villi were randomly selected per field. The numbers of IELs were counted in an area of 100 epithelial cells using a light microscope (CX23; Olympus Corporation; magnification, x40). The area of Peyer's patches was measured after H&E staining. The area of Peyer's patches was measured using a light microscope (CX23; Olympus Corporation; magnification, x10) equipped with a digital camera (MD30; Guangzhou Micro-shot Technology Co., Ltd.) and image analysis software (Mshot Image Analysis System v1.0; Guangzhou Micro-shot Technology Co., Ltd.). The area was calculated based on a previous report (21). In the present study, 10 images were randomly selected from each group to measure the area of Peyer's patches (22).

Immunohistochemistry for IgA-secreting cells and CD3+ lymphocytes in the intestine

Preparation of paraffin sections, dewaxing and hydration were conducted as aforementioned. The endogenous peroxidase activity was neutralized using 3% H2O2 at 37˚C for 30 min and the sections were rinsed three times with PBS for 15 min. Antigens were unmasked by microwaving (800 W) in citrate buffer (containing 2 mM citric acid and 10 mM trisodium citrate; pH 6.0) for 15 min. The sections were then treated with 5% BSA at 37˚C for 1 h to block non-specific binding prior to incubation with rabbit anti-pig CD3 (1:100; cat. no. ab16669; Abcam) or goat anti-pig IgA (1:100; cat. no. ab112639; Abcam) overnight at 4˚C. The paraffin sections were rinsed three times with PBS for 15 min and then incubated with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG or rabbit anti-goat IgG at 37˚C for 1 h. The paraffin sections were then rinsed three times with PBS and incubated with HRP labeled SABC at 37˚C. After 1 h, the paraffin sections were rinsed three times with PBS and stained with DAB at room temperature for 2 min. Cells were counterstained with 0.5% hematoxylin for 20 sec at room temperature. After staining, sections were dehydrated through increasing concentrations of ethanol (75% for 1 min, 85% for 1 min, 95% for 1 min and 100% for 2 min) and xylene (10 min) at room temperature, and finally sealed with a coverslip. All incubations were performed in a humidified chamber. Control staining was carried out simultaneously, in which the primary antibody was replaced with PBS. No specific staining was found for the control staining (without antibody). Sections were sealed with glass coverslips. Optical density of CD3+T cells was measured as previously described (23). The regions containing SIgA-secreting cells were counted using an optical microscope (24). A total of 20 images were randomly selected from each group and SIgA-secreting cells were counted in the same size field of view using the same multiple light microscope (CX23; Olympus Corporation; magnification, x40).

ELISA for interleukin (IL)-6 expression level in the intestine

Small intestine tissue was placed in 1.5-ml cryogenic vials containing 500 µl PBS and triturated using a Tissuelyser-24L multi-sample tissue grinder (Shanghai Jingxin Industrial Development Co., Ltd). The supernatant of the homogenate was collected after a 12,000 x g centrifugation for 10 min at 4˚C for the detection of IL-6. The protein concentration of the supernatant was measured using a BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). After a 10-fold dilution, the expression levels of IL-6 were measured using an ELISA kit (cat. no. ab100755; Abcam) according to the manufacturer's instructions. A total of 100 µl of each standard and sample was added to the antibody-conjugated wells. The wells were covered and incubated overnight at 4˚C with gentle shaking. The solution was discarded and washed 4 times with 300 µl of 1X Wash Solution using a multi-channel pipette. After the final wash, the solution was removed by aspiration or decantation. A total of 100 µl of biotinylated IL-6 antibody (cat. no. ab100755; Abcam) was added to each well. The samples were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with gentle shaking and then the solution was discarded. The washing step was repeated as previously performed. A total of 100 µl of 1X HRP-Streptavidin solution was added to each well and incubated for 45 min at room temperature with gentle shaking. The solution was discarded and 100 µl TMB One-Step Substrate Reagent was added to each well. This was incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the dark with gentle shaking. A total of 50 µl Stop Solution was added to each well. Data were immediately acquired using an automated ELISA plate reader at 450 nm.

ELISA for interferon (IFN)-γ expression level in the intestine

The steps and methods of sample processing were consistent with those for IL-6. After a 5-fold dilution, the expression levels of IFN-γ were measured using an ELISA kit (cat. no. ab113353; Abcam) according to the manufacturer's instructions. In brief, 50 µl of each standard was added with the sample to the antibody-conjugated wells. The wells were covered and incubated overnight at 4˚C with gentle shaking. The solution was discarded and washed 5 times with 1X Wash Solution. After the final wash, the solution was removed by decantation. A total of 100 µl of 1X biotinylated IFN-γ antibody (cat. no. ab113353; Abcam) was added to each well. The samples were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with gentle shaking and then the solution was discarded. The washing step was repeated as previously performed. A total of 100 µl of 1X HRP-Streptavidin solution was added to each well and incubated for 45 min at 37˚C. The solution was discarded and 100 µl TMB One-Step Substrate Reagent was added to each well. The samples were then incubated for 10 min at 37˚C in the dark. A total of 50 µl Stop Solution was subsequently added to each well. Data were immediately acquired using an automated ELISA plate reader at 450 nm.

Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) for IFN-γ in the intestine

Small intestine tissue was placed in 1.5-ml cryogenic vials containing 1 ml RNAiso Plus (Takara Bio, Inc.) and triturated in a Tissuelyser-24. The supernatant of these homogenates was collected after centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 15 min at 4˚C. Total RNA was extracted using RNAiso Plus reagent (Takara Bio, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA concentration and purity were measured using a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). cDNA synthesis was performed by incubating 15 µl double distilled water (DDW), 4 µl 5X PrimeScript RT Master mix (Shanghai Yeasen Biotechnology Co., Ltd) and 1 µl template RNA (diluted to 500 ng/µl) at 37˚C for 15 min and 85˚C for 15 sec. The reference gene used was GAPDH. Primers for IFN-γ were synthesized by GenScript. The primers used were as follows: IFN-γ, forward 5'-GCTCTGGGAAACTGAATGAC-3' and reverse 5'-TCTCTGGCCTTGGAACATAG-3'; and GAPDH, forward 5'-CTTCACGACCATGGAGAAGG-3' and reverse 5'-CCAAGCAGTTGGTGGTACAG. qPCR was performed on a real-time PCR machine (Hangzhou Bioer Co., Ltd.) in a 20 µl reaction volume containing 10 µl 2X SYBRGreen Master Mix (Takara Bio, Inc.), 0.4 µl each primer, 2 µl template cDNA and 7.2 µl DDW. The thermocycling conditions used for the PCR were as follows: Initial denaturation 95˚C for 5 sec, 40 cycles of 95˚C for 30 sec and 60˚C for 34 sec. The relative expression levels were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCq method (25).

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism V6.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc.) was used to perform the statistical analyses. One-way ANOVAs and repeated-measures ANOVAs were used to analyze the significance of the differences between means. Bonferroni's correction was used to analyze PEDV-specific titer datasets, while Tukey's multiple comparison tests were used to analyze the other datasets. Values are shown as the mean ± SD. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference and P<0.01, a highly significant difference.

Results

PEDV-specific SIgA and IgG titers

After receiving the first immunization, PEDV-specific mucosal SIgA titers exhibited an upward trend at days 7-14 for all groups (Fig. 1A-C). Following nasal immunization with inactivated PEDV combined with B. subtilis, SIgA titers significantly increased on day 7 after the initial immunization compared with oral immunization with inactivated PEDV. The titers of PEDV-specific SIgA peaked in saliva and nasal secretions on day 14, 7 days after the booster immunization, especially following nasal immunization with inactivated PEDV combined with B. subtilis. Although PEDV-specific SIgA titers declined after day 14 in all treatments, nasal immunization exhibited higher titers than the other treatments over the 28-day period. The SIgA level in feces did not reach a maximum on day 14 after the initial immunization, as with the nasal and saliva SIgA levels, as the immunization was administered orally and nasally. Therefore, the increased fecal SIgA level did not persist for as long as the levels in the saliva and nasal secretions. A variation in the IgG titers was detected in the serum (Fig. 1D). IgG titers were maintained at high levels after nasal immunization with inactivated PEDV combined with B. subtilis throughout the collection period after the initial immunization. No significant differences were detected in SIgA titers of the negative control group during the experiment. A timeline of the immunization program and sampling times is presented in Fig. 1E.

PEDV PRNT

The PEDV neutralization antibody level was evaluated using PRNTs. The number of plaques was proportional to the level of neutralizing antibodies. At the same dilution ratio, the plaque number decreased (P<0.01) after oral immunization with inactivated PEDV combined with B. subtilis, compared with inactivated PEDV alone (Fig. 2). After nasal immunization with inactivated PEDV combined with B. subtilis, the number of plaques decreased compared with oral immunization (P<0.05). With the exception of the control group, the number of plaques increased gradually according to the dilution ratio.

IEL numbers and determination of Peyer's patch areas

Fig. 3A indicated that the IELs were located between epithelial cells and at the basal epithelia. Changes in the number of IELs are presented in Fig. 3B, and the number of IELs was demonstrated to increase significantly after nasal immunization with inactivated PEDV combined with B. subtilis compared with oral immunization (P<0.05). No significant difference was identified after oral immunization with inactivated PEDV combined with B. subtilis compared with inactivated PEDV alone.

Peyer's patches are important inductive sites for the initiation of the adaptive immune response and function to maximize the immunological barrier of the host (26). The size of Peyer's patches serves an important role in their development (27,28). The Peyer's patches were located in the mucosal basement of the small intestine (Fig. 3C). The change in the area of Peyer's patches is shown in Fig. 3. The area of Peyer's patches increased after oral immunization with inactivated PEDV combined with B. subtilis compared with inactivated PEDV alone (P<0.05). A significant increase was also identified after nasal immunization with inactivated PEDV combined with B. subtilis when compared with oral immunization (P<0.01).

IgA-secreting cell numbers

The majority of IgA-secreting cells were located in the submucosa of the intestine (Fig. 4A). The change in the number of IgA-secreting cells is presented in Fig. 4B. The number of IgA-secreting cells in the intestine increased following oral immunization with inactivated PEDV combined with B. subtilis compared with inactivated PEDV alone (P<0.05). A significant increase was observed following nasal immunization with inactivated PEDV combined with B. subtilis compared with the oral immunization group (P<0.05).

Assessment of CD3+ T-cell numbers

The mucosal immune system generates immune responses via immune cells that reside in mucosal compartments (29). CD3+ T cells residing in the mucosa fulfill surveillance functions and are associated with the regulation of immune responses to pathogens (30). Therefore, CD3+ T cells in the intestines serve an important role in the adaptive mucosal immune response (31). CD3+ T cells were identified in the lamina propria of villi in the intestine (Fig. 5A). CD3+ T cells were observed to be round in shape. The change in the number of CD3+ T cells was determined by calculating the optical density. After oral immunization with inactivated PEDV combined with B. subtilis (Fig. 5B), the CD3+ T-cell numbers in the intestine increased significantly compared with inactivated PEDV alone (P<0.05). Additionally, after nasal immunization, the number of CD3+ T cells increased significantly (P<0.05) compared with oral immunization.

Estimation of IL-6 and IFN-γ expression levels

After oral immunization with inactivated PEDV combined with B. subtilis, the expression levels of IL-6 in the intestine increased compared with inactivated PEDV alone (P<0.01). After nasal immunization, the expression levels of IL-6 further increased significantly compared with oral immunization (P<0.05; Fig. 6A).

To assess the cellular immunity levels in the intestine, intestinal IFN-γ level was detected using RT-qPCR and ELISAs. After nasal immunization with inactivated PEDV combined with B. subtilis, the expression levels of IFN-γ in the intestine were found to increase significantly compared with oral immunization (P<0.05). There was no difference in IFN-γ protein levels although there was an increase in the mRNA levels (P<0.05), when comparing the oral immunization inactivated PEDV combined with B. subtilis to inactivated PEDV alone (Fig. 6B and C).

Discussion

The prevalence of PEDV infection worldwide is closely associated with the limited protection of conventional vaccines administered via intramuscular injection or orally (32). Therefore, an effective vaccine delivery strategy for preventing this disease remains to be developed. Nasal vaccination in pigs has made progress in controlling the outbreak of mucosal viral infections, including Rotavirus (33), Pseudorabies virus (34) and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (35). Nasal vaccinations may induce superior immune responses in the nasal, intestinal and reproductive mucosa of pigs. Therefore, nasal administration with inactivated PEDV may be a promising strategy that can be used for inducing the immune response in the intestinal mucosa. In the present study, nasal immunization was found to induce the expression of intestinal IgA and systemic IgG to resist PEDV infection.

The selection of an appropriate immunopotentiator is important in aiding the design of a mucosal vaccine (36,37). B. subtilis is a nonpathogenic gram-positive bacterium, a novel probiotic and a type of feed supplement. B. subtilis has its own unique resistance properties, such as high temperature resistance, and can survive under extreme conditions (38). Previous studies have also indicated that the intranasal administration of B. subtilis may increase the number of dendritic cells and IgA-secreting cells as well as enhance the immune response in the nasal mucosa of piglets (39,40). Therefore, in the present study, B. subtilis was used as an immunopotentiator to elicit a stronger immune response after the vaccination of piglets with inactivated PEDV. In the present study, B. subtilis served only as an immunopotentiator to enhance the local mucosal immune response. Furthermore, a previous study has demonstrated the immune effects of B. subtilis after oral administration in pigs (41). Additionally, the number of healthy pigs was limited due to a recent outbreak of African swine fever in China. Therefore, a B. subtilis group was excluded from the present study.

The results of the study revealed that PEDV-specific SIgA exhibited higher levels in the saliva, feces and nasal secretions after nasal immunization with inactivated PEDV combined with B. subtilis when compared with oral immunization. Furthermore, increased PEDV-specific IgG titers were detected in the serum. The humoral immune responses are mediated by antibodies. SIgA is a complex of IgA that is produced by plasma cells and is the most abundant antibody in the intestinal mucosal surface (42). SIgA is capable of binding to pathogens and excluding their access to the intestine, and mediates pathogen clearance in the intestinal mucosal surface (43). In the present study, increased PEDV-specific SIgA titers in the intestine warranted further analysis. Based on the common mucosal immune theory, antigens administered via the nasal mucosal surface are taken up by antigen-presenting cells, including dendritic cells or microfold cells that migrate to the nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (44) and lead to the activation of antigen-specific T cells. Upon activation, antigen-specific T cells proliferate and migrate to distant effector sites, including the intestinal mucosa (45). In the intestinal mucosa, activated T cells induce B cells to terminally differentiate into plasma cells and produce IgA in the presence of cytokines such as IL-6, which are produced by activated T cells in the intestine (46).

IEL numbers were observed to increase following the nasal immunization of piglets with inactivated PEDV combined with B. subtilis. Cellular immune responses are considered to be important in virus clearance (47). IELs are the first molecules likely to contact pathogens in the intestine (48). As a specialized T-cell population in the intestinal epithelium, IELs are considered to serve an important role in the regulation of mucosal immune responses (49). The present study indicated that oral infection of mice by rotavirus could expand and activate the IELs. Activated IELs induce the production of IFN-γ to promote innate antiviral resistance (50). Therefore, increased IEL numbers may promote the generation of IFN-γ to defend against PEDV directly in the intestine.

The results of the present study demonstrated that cytokine levels were elevated after nasal immunization of piglets with inactivated PEDV combined with B. subtilis. IL-6 and IFN-γ, which are secreted by immune cells, participate in regulating immune responses (51). Elevated IL-6 and IFN-γ expression levels in the intestine can enhance the overall levels of intestinal mucosal immunity (52). A previous study demonstrated that after the mucosal delivery of recombinant strains of Lactococcus lactis expressing IL-6, the production of IL-6 could stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of B cells (53), which explains the increases in IgA-secreting cells found in the intestine. Furthermore, the importance of IFN-γ in mucosal immunity is derived in part from its robust antiviral activities. Previous studies have indicated that enhanced IFN-γ levels contribute to the clearance of the virus (54,55). In the present study, increased IFN-γ expression levels may induce the innate immune response of the intestinal epithelium, which may serve an important role in defending against PEDV infections.

It is worth noting that a number of vaccines can enter the gastrointestinal tract during nasal immunization (56,57). A previous study developed a sheep model to detect the efficacy of nasal vaccine administration. The results indicated that the mucociliary action and involuntary swallowing directed a fraction of inhaled vaccines down the esophagus into the intestine, resulting in intestinal mucosal immunity (58). Therefore, nasal administration of a vaccine may exert a double immune effect.

Antiviral protection assays are the best method of evaluating immune responses. However, there are currently no suitable pigs due to an outbreak of African swine fever in China. This shortage of experiment materials was a limitation of the present study. Furthermore, the piglets were kept on PEDV-negative farms; therefore, the use of live PEDV was not permitted. Neutralizing antibodies indicate the body's ability to neutralize a virus, to a certain extent, and are a suitable alternative to antiviral challenge experiments (8,17). Therefore, in the present study, the neutralization antibody plaque reduction test was performed instead of an assay of antiviral protection.

In conclusion, the present study revealed that nasal immunization could effectively improve humoral and cellular immune levels in the intestine. Furthermore, the administration of a vaccine nasally would be relatively easy, making nasal immunization a favorable route of mucosal immunization for the prevention of PEDV infections.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The current study was supported by grants from the National Science Grant of China (grant nos. 31772777 and 31930109) and a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

EZ, JW, LH and QY conceived the study. EZ and QY participated in the design of the protocols for the study. EZ and JW performed the experiments. EZ, JW, YL, LH and YW analyzed the data. EZ wrote the manuscript. QY, EZ, JW and YL participated in the revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Animal Experiments of the College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University. All animal care and use were conducted in strict accordance with the Animal Research Committee guidelines of the College of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Song D, Huang D, Peng Q, Huang T, Chen Y, Zhang T, Nie X, He H, Wang P, Liu Q and Tang Y: Molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of porcine epidemic diarrhea viruses associated with outbreaks of severe diarrhea in piglets in Jiangxi, China 2013. PLoS One. 10(e0120310)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Song D and Park B: Porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus: A comprehensive review of molecular epidemiology, diagnosis, and vaccines. Virus Genes. 44:167–175. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Li W, van Kuppeveld FJM, He Q, Rottier PJM and Bosch BJ: Cellular entry of the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Virus Res. 226:117–127. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Hou X, Jiang X, Jiang Y, Tang L, Xu Y, Qiao X, Min L, Wen C, Ma G and Li Y: Oral immunization against PEDV with recombinant lactobacillus casei expressing dendritic cell-targeting peptide fusing COE Protein of PEDV in Piglets. Viruses. 10(E106)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Wang D, Fang L and Xiao S: Porcine epidemic diarrhea in China. Virus Res. 226:7–13. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Mantis NJ and Forbes SJ: Secretory IgA: Arresting microbial pathogens at epithelial borders. Immunol Invest. 39:383–406. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Poles J, Alvarez Y and Hioe CE: Induction of intestinal immunity by mucosal vaccines as a means of controlling HIV infection. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 30:1027–1040. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Wang J, Huang L, Mou C, Zhang E, Wang Y, Cao Y and Yang Q: Mucosal immune responses induced by oral administration recombinant Bacillus subtilis expressing the COE antigen of PEDV in newborn piglets. Biosci Rep. 39(BSR20182028)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Li Y, Wu Q, Huang L, Yuan C, Wang J and Yang Q: An alternative pathway of enteric PEDV dissemination from nasal cavity to intestinal mucosa in swine. Nat Commun. 9(3811)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Guy B: Evaluation of events occurring at mucosal surfaces: Techniques used to collect and analyze mucosal secretions and cells. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 9:753–762. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Kozlowski PA, Williams SB, Lynch RM, Flanigan TP, Patterson RR, Cu-Uvin S and Neutra MR: Differential induction of mucosal and systemic antibody responses in women after nasal, rectal, or vaginal immunization: Influence of the menstrual cycle. J Immunol. 169:566–574. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Staats HF, Montgomery SP and Palker TJ: Intranasal immunization is superior to vaginal, gastric, or rectal immunization for the induction of systemic and mucosal anti-HIV antibody responses. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 13:945–952. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Lauring AS, Jones JO and Andino R: Rationalizing the development of live attenuated virus vaccines. Nat Biotechnol. 28:573–579. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Azegami T, Yuki Y and Kiyono H: Challenges in mucosal vaccines for the control of infectious diseases. Int Immunol. 26:517–528. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Amuguni H and Tzipori S: Bacillus subtilis: A temperature resistant and needle free delivery system of immunogens. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 8:979–986. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Upadhaya SD, Kim SC, Valientes RA and Kim IH: The effect ofbacillus-based feed additive on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal gas emission, and pen cleanup characteristics of growing-finishing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 28:999–1005. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Mou C, Zhu L, Xing X, Lin J and Yang Q: Immune responses induced by recombinant bacillus subtilis expressing the spike protein of transmissible gastroenteritis virus in pigs. Antiviral Res. 131:74–84. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Mou C, Zhu L, Yang J, Xu W, Cheng X and Yang Q: Immune responses induced by recombinant bacillus subtilis expressing the hemagglutinin protein of H5N1 in chickens. Sci Rep. 6(38403)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Li Y, Wang G, Wang J, Man K and Yang QJV: Cell attenuated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus strain Zhejiang08 provides effective immune protection attributed to dendritic cell stimulation. Vaccine. 35:7033–7041. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Corazza GR, Frazzoni M and Gasbarrini G: Jejunal intraepithelial lymphocytes in coeliac disease: Are they increased or decreased? Gut. 25:158–162. 1984.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Inoue R, Tsukahara T, Nakatani M, Okutani M, Nishibayashi R, Ogawa S, Harayama T, Nagino T, Hatanaka H, Fukuta K, et al: Weaning markedly affects transcriptome profiles and peyer's patch development in piglet ileum. Front Immunol. 6(630)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Ryan KA, Daly P, Li Y, Hooton C and O'Toole PW: Strain-specific inhibition of helicobacter pylori by lactobacillus salivarius and other lactobacilli. J Antimicrob Chemother. 61:831–834. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Youssef S and Salah M: Differential expression of CD3, TNF-α, and VEGF induced by olanzapine on the spleen of adult male albino rats and the possible protective role of vitamin C. Biomedicines. 7(E39)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Lin J, Tu C, Mou C, Chen X and Yang Q: CpG DNA facilitate the inactivated transmissible gastroenteritis virus in enhancing the local and systemic immune response of pigs via oral administration. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 172:1–8. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Kiyono H and Fukuyama S: NALT- versus Peyer's-patch-mediated mucosal immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 4:699–710. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Sato T, Endoh M, Yoshida H, Yasuo S, Katsuno T, Saito Y, Isono K and Koseki H: Mammalian Polycomb complexes are required for Peyer's patch development by regulating lymphoid cell proliferation. Gene. 379:166–174. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Lasa-Saracíbar B, Aznar MÁ, Lana H, Aizpún I, Gil AG and Blanco-Prieto MJ: Lipid nanoparticles protect from edelfosine toxicity in vivo. Int J Pharm. 474:1–5. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Kabat AM, Pott J and Maloy KJ: The mucosal immune system and its regulation by autophagy. Front Immunol. 7(240)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

van Wijk F and Cheroutre H: Mucosal T cells in gut homeostasis and inflammation. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 6:559–566. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Wu RQ, Zhang DF, Tu E, Chen QM and Chen W: The mucosal immune system in the oral cavity-an orchestra of T cell diversity. Int J Oral Sci. 6:125–132. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Song D, Moon H and Kang BJ: Porcine epidemic diarrhea: A review of current epidemiology and available vaccines. Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 4:166–176. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

O'Neal CM, Clements JD, Estes MK and Conner ME: Rotavirus 2/6 viruslike particles administered intranasally with cholera toxin, Escherichia coli heat-labile toxin (LT), and LT-R192G induce protection from rotavirus challenge. J Virol. 72:3390–3393. 1998.PubMed/NCBI

34 

Van Oirschot JT: Intranasal vaccination of pigs against Aujeszky's disease: Comparison with one or two doses of attenuated vaccines in pigs with high maternal antibody titres. Res Vet Sci. 42:12–16. 1987.PubMed/NCBI

35 

Zhang L, Tian X and Zhou F: Intranasal administration of CpG oligonucleotides induces mucosal and systemic Type 1 immune responses and adjuvant activity to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome killed virus vaccine in piglets in vivo. Int Immunopharmacol. 7:1732–1740. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Schijns VE and Lavelle EC: Trends in vaccine adjuvants. Expert Rev Vaccines. 10:539–550. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Blaauboer SM, Mansouri S, Tucker HR, Wang HL, Gabrielle VD and Jin L: The mucosal adjuvant cyclic di-GMP enhances antigen uptake and selectively activates pinocytosis-efficient cells in vivo. Elife 4: 2015.

38 

Setlow P: Spores of Bacillus subtilis: Their resistance to and killing by radiation, heat and chemicals. J Appl Microbiol. 101:514–525. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Deng J, Li Y, Zhang J and Yang Q: Co-administration of Bacillus subtilis RJGP16 and Lactobacillus salivarius B1 strongly enhances the intestinal mucosal immunity of piglets. Res Vet Sci. 94:62–68. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Yang Y, Jing Y, Yang J and Yang Q: Effects of intranasal administration with Bacillus subtilison immune cells in the nasal mucosa and tonsils of piglets. Exp Ther Med. 15:5189–5198. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Jing Y, Liu H, Xu W and Yang Q: Amelioration of the DSS-induced colitis in mice by pretreatment with 4,4'-diaponeurosporene-producingBacillus subtilis. Exp Ther Med. 14:6069–6073. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Herich RJ: Is the role of IgA in local immunity completely known? Immunol. 28:1–15. 2016.

43 

Mantis NJ, Rol N and Corthésy B: Secretory IgA's complex roles in immunity and mucosal homeostasis in the gut. Mucosal Immunol. 4:603–611. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Holmgren J and Czerkinsky C: Mucosal immunity and vaccines. Nat Med. 11 (4 Suppl):S45–S53. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Neutra MR and Kozlowski PA: Mucosal vaccines: The promise and the challenge. Nat Rev Immunol. 6:148–158. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Mcghee JR, Fujihashi K, Beagley KW and Kiyono HJ: Role of interleukin-6 in human and mouse mucosal IgA plasma cell responses. Immunol Res. 10:418–422. 1991.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

47 

Libbey JE and Fujinami RS: Adaptive immune response to viral infections in the central nervous system. Handb Clin Neurol. 123:225–247. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

48 

Hershberg R and Blumberg RS: The lymphocyte-epithelial-bacterial interface. Springer US, 2003.

49 

Li Z, Zhang C, Zhou Z, Zhang J, Zhang J and Tian Z: Small intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes expressing CD8 and T cell receptor γδ are involved in bacterial clearance during Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection. Infect Immun. 80:565–574. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

50 

Dharakul T, Rott L and Greenberg HB: Recovery from chronic rotavirus infection in mice with severe combined immunodeficiency: Virus clearance mediated by adoptive transfer of immune CD8+ T lymphocytes. J Virol. 64:4375–4382. 1990.PubMed/NCBI

51 

Vazquez MI, Catalan-Dibene J and Zlotnik AJC: B cells responses and cytokine production are regulated by their immune microenvironment. Cytokine. 74:318–326. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

52 

Onyiah JC and Colgan SP: Cytokine responses and epithelial function in the intestinal mucosa. Cell Mol Life Sci. 73:4203–4212. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

53 

Steidler L, Robinson K, Chamberlain L, Schofield KM, Remaut E, Le Page RW and Wells JM: Mucosal delivery of murine interleukin-2 (IL-2) and IL-6 by recombinant strains of Lactococcus lactis coexpressing antigen and cytokine. Infect Immun. 66:3183–3189. 1998.PubMed/NCBI

54 

Weiss ID, Wald O, Wald H, Beider K, Abraham M, Galun E, Nagler A and Peled A: IFN-gamma treatment at early stages of influenza virus infection protects mice from death in a NK cell-dependent manner. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 30:439–449. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

55 

Kak G, Raza M and Tiwari BK: Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ): Exploring its implications in infectious diseases. Biomol Concepts. 9:64–79. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

56 

Djupesland PG: Nasal drug delivery devices: Characteristics and performance in a clinical perspective-a review. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 3:42–62. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

57 

El-Kattan A, Hurst S, Brodfuehrer J and Loi CM: Anatomical and physiological factors affecting oral drug bioavailability in rats, dogs, and humans. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2011.

58 

Yen HH, Scheerlinck JP, Gekas S and Sutton P: A sheep cannulation model for evaluation of nasal vaccine delivery. Methods. 38:117–123. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August-2020
Volume 20 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zhang E, Wang J, Li Y, Huang L, Wang Y and Yang Q: Comparison of oral and nasal immunization with inactivated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus on intestinal immunity in piglets. Exp Ther Med 20: 1596-1606, 2020.
APA
Zhang, E., Wang, J., Li, Y., Huang, L., Wang, Y., & Yang, Q. (2020). Comparison of oral and nasal immunization with inactivated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus on intestinal immunity in piglets. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 20, 1596-1606. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8828
MLA
Zhang, E., Wang, J., Li, Y., Huang, L., Wang, Y., Yang, Q."Comparison of oral and nasal immunization with inactivated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus on intestinal immunity in piglets". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 20.2 (2020): 1596-1606.
Chicago
Zhang, E., Wang, J., Li, Y., Huang, L., Wang, Y., Yang, Q."Comparison of oral and nasal immunization with inactivated porcine epidemic diarrhea virus on intestinal immunity in piglets". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 20, no. 2 (2020): 1596-1606. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8828