Open Access

Diagnostic value of candidate noncoding RNAs in leukocytes of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus

  • Authors:
    • Jialei Hu
    • Hanyou Mu
    • Linshan Gao
    • Ying Pan
    • Chuanfei Wu
    • Dong Zhang
    • Qiaojun Chen
    • Honghui Ding
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: December 16, 2020     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9576
  • Article Number: 145
  • Copyright: © Hu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) are involved in the pathological processes of various diseases. The aim of the present study was to verify the expression levels and the diagnostic value of two candidate ncRNAs in the blood leukocytes of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) compared to healthy controls. The long ncRNA paired box 8 antisense 1 (Pax8‑AS1) and the microRNA miR‑4646 were selected, which were identified to be associated with GDM by bioinformatics analysis of a dataset from the Gene Expression Omnibus GEO database. By using reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR, the expression levels of Pax8‑AS1 and miR‑4646 were analysed in leukocytes of patients with GDM (n=35) and normal pregnant females (n=35). The results indicated a significant decrease in the expression levels of both Pax8‑AS1 and miR‑4646 in patients with GDM as compared with those in the healthy controls. In the second trimester, a strong negative correlation between Pax8‑AS1/miR‑4646 and 2‑h glucose levels was detected in patients with GDM. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that the levels of Pax8‑AS1 and miR‑4646 in the second trimester of pregnancy had a significant diagnostic value with high selectivity and specificity for GDM (area under the curve values, 0.902 and 0.891, respectively; P<0.001). Overall, the present study suggested that Pax8‑AS1 and miR‑4646 may serve as promising diagnostic biomarkers for GDM.

Introduction

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is the most common medical complication of pregnancy and is known as different degrees of glucose intolerance that are initially identified during pregnancy (1). Owing to the increase in the rate of obesity and the increase in maternal age, the morbidity of gestational diabetes is currently increasing (2). However, the pathogenesis of GDM remains to be fully elucidated and early-mid pregnancy diagnostic markers may facilitate progress in this area. Controversy persists regarding GDM screening, but current consensus recommendations support screening for GDM during mid-pregnancy (24-28 weeks of gestation) (3). In addition to its detrimental effects on maternal health, GDM has also been demonstrated to impede foetal health and amplify the offspring's tendency to develop metabolic diseases, such as obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) later in life (4-6). Therefore, the identification of novel signatures or biomarkers that enhance the determination of clinical behaviours is essential for the treatment of GDM.

Several studies have reported that there are multiple genes associated with diabetes. Over the past decades, several types of non-coding RNA (ncRNA) species, including microRNAs (miRNAs/miRs), long ncRNAs (lncRNAs) and circular RNAs, have emerged as pivotal regulators of multiple cellular functions, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, cellular differentiation, tumorigenesis and metastasis (7). LncRNAs are defined as RNAs with a length of >200 nucleotides and no protein-coding ability (8,9). Numerous lncRNAs have been reported to be involved in GDM progression. Among them, the lncRNA metastasis associated in lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1) was increased in endothelial cells after high levels of glucose stimulation. Mechanistic investigations suggested that MALAT1 promotes insulin resistance by increasing the stability of the nuclear transcription factor sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1C (10). However, to the best of our knowledge, only a small number of studies have been performed on the utility of circulating lncRNAs for the dynamic monitoring of patients for GDM (11).

miRNAs are known to post-transcriptionally regulate the expression of their target genes by binding to the 3' untranslated region of the respective mRNA (12). The identification of stable circulating miRNAs in plasma and serum has provided promise for minimally invasive biomarkers for disease prediction, diagnosis and prognosis (13). According to a previous review, an increasing number of studies have identified that certain miRNAs are associated with insulin secretion, inflammation and insulin resistance (14). Differences have also been detected in circulating levels of miRNAs when comparing T2D cases to controls (15).

In the present study, bioinformatics analysis was used to explore significantly differentially expressed genes during GDM progression and the lncRNA paired box 8 antisense 1 (PAX8-AS1) and miR-4646 were identified as the most downregulated ncRNAs in GDM. Therefore, the study further endeavoured to investigate PAX8-AS1 and miR-4646 in the blood leukocytes of patients with GDM compared to those of healthy pregnant females as biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of GDM.

Materials and methods

Retrieval of RNA sequencing data and analysis

RNA sequencing datasets from the gene expression omnibus (GEO) database were used to analyse the expression profiles of lncRNAs and miRNAs in GDM (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo). The dataset no. GSE92772 was used, containing the expression data of 8 subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and 8 patients with GDM who were matched in terms of body mass index (BMI) and age (16). The RNA sequencing of the leukocytes of these samples was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (Illumina, Inc.).

Participants and maternal blood collection

To validate the expression levels of lncRNAs and miRNAs in patients with GDM and normal controls, a group of 35 pregnant females with NGT (age, 32±3 years; BMI, 27.2±3.8 kg/m2) and 35 patients with GDM (age, 34±4 years; BMI, 28.5±4.1 kg/m2) were selected from a pregnancy cohort. Maternal blood samples were from the second trimester (24-28 weeks). Patients with other pregnancy-associated diseases, including chronic hypertension, multiple pregnancies or any other diseases, including liver or kidney disease, cancer and gynaecological diseases, were excluded from the present study. Serum and blood samples of the pregnant females in the second trimester (24-28 weeks of gestation) were collected at the Yiwu Women's and Children's Hospital (Jinhua, China) between June and November 2019. Patients who had other pregnancy-associated diseases, such as gynaecological diseases, or carcinomas, chronic hypertension or liver diseases, were excluded from the present study.

Oral glucose tolerance test and clinical chemical analyses

The participants underwent a 5-point 75-g oral glucose tolerance test after overnight fasting. Venous blood samples were obtained at 0, 60 and 120 min for the determination of plasma glucose and insulin levels. Blood glucose was determined using a bedside glucose analyser (Roche Diagnostics). NGT was defined as fasting glucose ≤5.11 mmol/l, 1-h glucose ≤10.00 mmol/l and 2-h glucose ≤8.50 mmol/l. GDM patients were diagnosed according to the recommendations of the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups for the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycaemia during pregnancy, published in 2010(3).

Total RNA extraction and reverse transcription-quantitative (RT-q)PCR

Firstly, to separate leukocytes from the blood samples, 200 µl fresh blood was taken, where 600 µl red blood cell lysate buffer (cat. no. R1010; Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.) was added and mixed at room temperature for 10 min, which were then and centrifuged for 7300 x g for 1 min at room temperature. Leukocytes were obtained after supernatant was discarded. Total RNA from maternal blood leukocytes was then extracted using TRIzol® reagent according to manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Complementary (c)DNA was synthesized with PrimeScript IV 1st strand cDNA Synthesis Mix (Takara Biotechnology, Co., Ltd.) using a LightCycler 480 II (Roche Diagnostics). The reverse transcription was performed under the following conditions: 30˚C for 10 min, followed by 42˚C for 15 min. Real-time PCR analyses were quantified using TB Green® Fast qPCR Mix (Takara Biotechnology, Co., Ltd.) on a LightCycler 480 II (Roche Diagnostics). The PCR reaction system is as follows: 4 µl qPCR mix, 1 µl Taq enzyme, 4 µl primers, 2 µg cDNA and 10 µl water. The following candidate ncRNAs were selected: miR-4646, Pax8-AS1, miR-5196, interleukin 21 receptor-AS1 (IL21R-AS1), signal recognition particle 14-AS1 (SRP14-AS1), MORC family CW-type zinc finger 2-AS1 (MORC2-AS1), miR-8061, LIM homeobox 4-AS1 (LHX4-AS1), Sjogren syndrome/scleroderma autoantigen 1-AS1 (SSSCA1-AS1) and miR-3679. The sequences of the primers used are listed in Table I. The amplification was performed under the following conditions: 95˚C for 10 min for initial denaturation; followed by 35 cycles of 94˚C for 15 sec, annealing at 56˚C for 25 sec and 72˚C for 30 sec. The expression levels of a gene were determined by the following formula: ΔCq=Cq (target gene)-ΔCq (internal reference gene) (17). The levels of the ncRNAs were normalized to the levels of U6(18).

Table I

Primer sequences used for PCR.

Table I

Primer sequences used for PCR.

GeneForward primer (5'→3')Reverse primer (5'→3')
miR-4646ACTGGGAAGAGGAGCTTGTCGTGGAGTCGGC
Pax8-AS1 CCCCAAAGCCTAACTCCCTG CACTTGGGTTTTGCTGCCTC
miR-5196 TCTGAGGAGACCTGGGCTGTTGTCGTGGAGTCGGC
IL21R-AS1 TGCTGGTTCTTGTAGCTCCG CTATGGGGCCACCAGTTGTC
SRP14-AS1 CTAACTCTGCCACACACGGT GCTCAGACCTGCAACCTCTT
MORC2-AS1 GTTCATAACCGTTGGCTGGT GGGTCCACTTTTGTCCCCAA
miR-8061 GAGAGGATGCCTTAGATTATGTCGTGGAGTCGGC
LHX4-AS1 GCATCTCACCTGTACGACCC TGCTGCAGATAGGCCGAAG
SSSCA1-AS1 CCATCGCCACCCCAGTAATC CATGCAGAAGGGGAGTGGTC
miR-3679 CGTGGTGAGGATATGGCAGGTGTCGTGGAGTCGGC
U6 CCCTTCGGGGACATCCGATA TTTGTGCGTGTCATCCTTGC

[i] miR, microRNA; Pax8-AS1, paired box 8 antisense 1; IL21R, interleukin 21 receptor; SRP14, signal recognition particle 14; MORC2, MORC family CW-type zinc finger 2; LHX4, LIM homeobox 4; SSSCA1, Sjogren syndrome/scleroderma autoantigen 1.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 18.0 software (SPSS, Inc.) was used to statistically analyse the data. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was applied to determine the best cut-off values of Pax8-As1 and miR-4646 for diagnosing patients with GDM. The Youden index is used to determine the best cut-off value (19). Correlation between two variables was analyzed using the Pearson's correlation test. Independent-samples unpaired t-tests were used when a normal distribution and homogeneity of variance were both satisfied. P<0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Different expression patterns in blood leukocytes of patients with GDM

To identify essential ncRNAs in GDM, raw microarray data were downloaded from GEO (dataset no. GSE92772). To obtain differentially expressed genes, the signal data were normalized and z-score-transformed (unpaired t-test according to the experimental design was used to validate statistical significance; Fig. 1A). It was determined that numerous lncRNAs and miRNAs were decreased in patients with GDM compared to normal controls. Among them, miR-4646 and Pax8-AS1 were the most downregulated and conserved ncRNAs in the GSE92772 dataset (Fig. 1B).

To explore the difference between the GDM and normal gravidas, a comprehensive metabolic panel in the maternal serum samples was tested. The results of the oral glucose tolerance test were significantly higher in the GDM group than in the control group (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in other laboratory indicators, including uric acid (UA), total bile acid (TBA), globulin (GLOB), alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase, between the cases and controls (Table II).

Table II

Variables of the comprehensive metabolic panel associated with GDM.

Table II

Variables of the comprehensive metabolic panel associated with GDM.

VariableNormal rangeNormal glucose toleranceGDM
ALT (U/l)7-4516.83±3.7814.75±2.34
AST (U/l)13-4015.83±4.2617.16±5.09
DBIL (µmol/l)0.0-8.01.95±0.591.75±0.38
TBIL (µmol/l)0.0-21.04.65±1.184.67±0.94
CREA (µmol/l)41-7346.33±5.7448.45±6.15
UA (µmol/l)142-339260.08±67.11247.55±69.14
TBA (µmol/l)0.0-12.02.29±1.072.50±1.32
GLOB (g/l)20.0-40.025.91±1.7925.9±2.47
ALB (g/l)40.0-55.038.64±1.9637.58±2.64
ALP (U/l)35-10088.75±35.59108.25±46.41
LDH (U/l)120-250175.1±33.99174.41±20.147
ADA (U/l)0.0-15.08±1.897.36±1.51
2-h glucose (mmol/l)<8.55.40±0.75 9.69±0.96a
1-h glucose (mmol/l)<10.06.47±1.02 10.23±1.69a
Fasting glucose (mmol/l)<5.14.73±0.824.81±0.82

[i] aP<0.05; values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; NGT, normal glucose tolerance; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; DBIL, Direct Bilirubin; TBIL, total bilirubin; CREA, creatinine; UA, uric acid; GLOB, globulin; ALB, albumin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; ADA, Adenosine deaminase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; TBA, total bile acid.

ncRNA expression patterns in blood leukocytes associated with GDM

To explore the expression of 10 candidate GDM-associated ncRNAs in blood leukocytes, the total RNA from whole blood cells was extracted from 35 subjects with NGT and 35 patients with GDM. As indicated in Fig. 2, the levels of miR-4646, Pax8-AS1, miR-5196, IL21R-AS1, SRP14-AS1, LHX4-AS1, SSSCA1-AS1 and miR-3679 in patients with GDM were significantly lower than those in the controls. However, there were no significant differences in the levels of MORC2-AS1 and miR-8061 between the two groups. Furthermore, miR-4646 and Pax8-AS1 were the most downregulated ncRNAs among them. Subsequently, the correlations between the expression levels of the eight candidate genes (miR-4646, Pax8-AS1, miR-5196, IL21R-AS1, SRP14-AS1, LHX4-AS1, SSSCA1-AS1 and miR-3679) and 2-h glucose in the leukocytes of patients with GDM were detected. As presented in Fig. 3, a significant negative correlation was observed between miR-4646, Pax8-AS1, miR-5196 and SRP14-AS1 levels and 2-h glucose in the GDM group (r=0.83, r=0.73, r=0.54 and r=0.64, respectively; P<0.001).

ROC analysis

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of miR-4646, Pax8-AS1, miR-5196 and SRP14-AS1 in maternal blood leukocytes as biomarkers for GDM, ROC curves were drawn (Fig. 4). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to assess the diagnostic value of ncRNAs for GDM. In the ROC analysis, miR-4646 and Pax8-AS1 achieved an obvious separation between the GDM and control groups. The AUC of miR-4646 during the second trimester was 0.891 (95% CI: 0.811-0.972, P<0.001); its highest sensitivity and specificity were 88.6 and 82.9%, respectively (cut-off, 1.95). The AUC of Pax8-AS1 for GDM was 0.902 (95% CI: 0.824-0.979, P<0.001), with a sensitivity and specificity of 85.7 and 88.6%, respectively (cut-off, 2.165).

Discussion

GDM is common and frequently has serious consequences for mothers and their children. The roles of several ncRNAs in the occurrence of GDM have recently attracted our attention, namely miRNAs and lncRNAs. To determine the role of ncRNAs in GDM, circulating miRNAs and lncRNAs from maternal blood leukocytes were examined. The present study demonstrated that the levels of Pax8-AS1 and miR-4646 in the blood leukocytes of patients with GDM were significantly downregulated compared with those in pregnant females without GDM. Pax8-AS1 and miR-4646 had the highest diagnostic value for GDM among the differentially expressed ncRNAs identified.

The aberrant expression of lncRNAs is closely associated with the development of multiple complex diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular diseases, nervous system diseases and diabetes (20-22). However, the clinical significance and biological mechanisms of lncRNAs in the progression of GDM have remained largely elusive. In the present study, six lncRNAs were selected as candidate biomarkers and their diagnostic value for GDM was assessed. It was indicated that Pax8-AS1 had the highest diagnostic value for GDM. The lncRNA Pax8-AS1 has been previously reported to participate in the development and progression of diseases, including childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, cervical cancer and papillary thyroid carcinoma (23-25). However, the association between Pax8-AS1 and GDM has remained elusive. The present results indicated that Pax8-AS1 was expressed at low levels in blood leukocytes in the second trimester and was negatively correlated with postprandial blood glucose. ROC curve analysis of ncRNAs from maternal blood leukocytes suggested that the diagnostic value of Pax8-AS1 for GDM was the highest among all lncRNAs tested, with a sensitivity and specificity of 85.7 and 88.6%, respectively. Compared with known biomarkers, such as plasma protein profiling in the second trimester, Pax8-AS1 is more conserved and highly sensitive. The present analysis provided insight for the development of novel biomarkers for GDM.

miRNAs have been indicated to have functional relevance in the development of obesity and different types of diabetes (26-28). Numerous studies have also reported that miRNAs have a key role during GDM progression. For instance, miR-517b, which was associated with GDM among pregnancies with male foetuses only, regulates the expression of TNF superfamily member 15, a pro-inflammatory, anti-angiogenic cytokine, which may reflect a sex-specific placental response to the maternal immune system (29). Wander et al (30) observed associations between plasma levels of miR-21-3p and GDM in overweight/obese but not in healthy maternal individuals. In the present study, four miRNAs were selected as candidate biomarkers for GDM in a patient cohort. Significantly decreased miR-4646 was detected in the leukocytes of patients with GDM. Further analysis demonstrated that there was a strong correlation between miR-4646 levels and 2-h plasma glucose levels in patients with GDM in the second trimester. To assess the diagnostic value of miR-4646 in GDM, ROC curve analysis was performed. The results suggested that the diagnostic value of miR-4646 for GDM was the highest among all miRNAs tested, with a sensitivity and specificity of 88.6 and 82.9%, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to report that miR-4646 may function as a potential diagnostic biomarker for GDM.

In conclusion, Pax8-AS1 and miR-4646 were decreased in GDM in the second trimester of pregnancy and are closely associated with glycosylation markers. Although the sample size of the present study was limited, the results enhance the current knowledge on the relationship between GDM and miRNAs/lncRNAs. The present results open up possibilities for the diagnosis of GDM or its treatment by regulating the expression of Pax8-AS1 and miR-4646. In the future, identification of further ncRNAs will undoubtedly enhance the current knowledge of new ncRNA functions, allowing us to better understand the pathogenesis and development of GDM and ultimately facilitate the development of ncRNA-directed diagnostics and therapeutics against this potentially fatal disease.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

JH and QC contributed to the design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data and prepared all figures and tables. HM and LG have substantial contributions to the design of the work. YP, CW, DZ and HD took part in analysing the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Yiwu Maternal and Child Hospital (Jinhua, China) and all subjects provided written informed consent.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Binder AM, LaRocca J, Lesseur C, Marsit CJ and Michels KB: Epigenome-wide and transcriptome-wide analyses reveal gestational diabetes is associated with alterations in the human leukocyte antigen complex. Clin Epigenetics. 7(79)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Zhu Y and Zhang C: Prevalence of gestational diabetes and risk of progression to type 2 diabetes: A global perspective. Curr Diab Rep. 16(7)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel. Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, Catalano PA, Damm P, Dyer AR, Leiva A, Hod M, et al: International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 33:676–682. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Sobngwi E, Boudou P, Mauvais-Jarvis F, Leblanc H, Velho G, Vexiau P, Porcher R, Hadjadj S, Pratley R, Tataranni PA, et al: Effect of a diabetic environment in utero on predisposition to type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 361:1861–1865. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Catalano PM and Hauguel-De Mouzon S: Is it time to revisit the Pedersen hypothesis in the face of the obesity epidemic? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 204:479–487. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

El Hajj N, Schneider E, Lehnen H and Haaf T: Epigenetics and life-long consequences of an adverse nutritional and diabetic intrauterine environment. Reproduction. 148:R111–R120. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Esteller M: Non-coding RNAs in human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 12:861–874. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Anastasiadou E, Jacob LS and Slack FJ: Non-coding RNA networks in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 18:5–18. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Quinn JJ and Chang HY: Unique features of long non-coding RNA biogenesis and function. Nat Rev Genet. 17:47–62. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Yan C, Chen J and Chen N: Long noncoding RNA MALAT1 promotes hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance by increasing nuclear SREBP-1c protein stability. Sci Rep. 6(22640)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Leng L, Zhang C, Ren L and Li Q: Construction of a long non-coding RNA-mediated competitive endogenous RNA network reveals global patterns and regulatory markers in gestational diabetes. Int J Mol Med. 43:927–935. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Tuna M, Machado AS and Calin GA: Genetic and epigenetic alterations of microRNAs and implications for human cancers and other diseases. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 55:193–214. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, Fritz BR, Wyman SK, Pogosova-Agadjanyan EL, Peterson A, Noteboom J, O'Briant KC, Allen A, et al: Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:10513–10518. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Esteves JV, Enguita FJ and Machado UF: MicroRNAs-mediated regulation of skeletal muscle GLUT4 expression and translocation in insulin resistance. J Diabetes Res. 2017(7267910)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Pordzik J, Jakubik D, Jarosz-Popek J, Wicik Z, Eyileten C, De Rosa S, Indolfi C, Siller-Matula JM, Czajka P and Postula M: Significance of circulating microRNAs in diabetes mellitus type 2 and platelet reactivity: Bioinformatic analysis and review. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 18(113)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Stirm L, Huypens P, Sass S, Batra R, Fritsche L, Brucker S, Abele H, Hennige AM, Theis F, Beckers J, et al: Maternal whole blood cell miRNA-340 is elevated in gestational diabetes and inversely regulated by glucose and insulin. Sci Rep. 8(1366)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Method. 25:402–408. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Iempridee T, Wiwithaphon S, Piboonprai K, Pratedrat P, Khumkhrong P, Japrung D, Temisak S, Laiwejpithaya S, Chaopotong P and Dharakul T: Identification of reference genes for circulating long noncoding RNA analysis in serum of cervical cancer patients. FEBS Open Bio. 8:1844–1854. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Li C, Chen J and Qin G: Partial Youden index and its inferences. J Biopharm Stat. 29:385–399. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Wapinski O and Chang HY: Long noncoding RNAs and human disease. Trends Cell Biol. 21:354–361. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Li CH and Chen Y: Targeting long non-coding RNAs in cancers: Progress and prospects. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 45:1895–1910. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Carter G, Miladinovic B, Patel AA, Deland L, Mastorides S and Patel NA: Circulating long noncoding RNA GAS5 levels are correlated to prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus. BBA Clin. 4:102–107. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Bahari G, Hashemi M, Naderi M, Sadeghi-Bojd S and Taheri M: Long non-coding RNA PAX8-AS1 polymorphisms increase the risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Biomed Rep. 8:184–190. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Han J, Zhou W, Jia M, Wen J, Jiang J, Shi J, Zhang K, Ma H, Liu J, Ren J, et al: Expression quantitative trait loci in long non-coding RNA PAX8-AS1 are associated with decreased risk of cervical cancer. Mol Genet Genomics. 291:1743–1748. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Zhang Y, Li F and Chen J: MYC promotes the development of papillary thyroid carcinoma by inhibiting the expression of lncRNA PAX8-AS1:28. Oncol Rep. 41:2511–2517. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Arner P and Kulyté A: MicroRNA regulatory networks in human adipose tissue and obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 11:276–288. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Miao C, Chang J, Zhang G and Fang Y: MicroRNAs in type 1 diabetes: New research progress and potential directions. Biochem Cell Biol. 96:498–506. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Vienberg S, Geiger J, Madsen S and Dalgaard LT: MicroRNAs in metabolism. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 219:346–361. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Anton L, Olarerin-George AO, Hogenesch JB and Elovitz MA: Placental expression of miR-517a/b and miR-517c contributes to trophoblast dysfunction and preeclampsia. PLoS One. 10(e0122707)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Wander PL, Boyko EJ, Hevner K, Parikh VJ, Tadesse MG, Sorensen TK, Williams MA and Enquobahrie DA: Circulating early- and mid-pregnancy microRNAs and risk of gestational diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 132:1–9. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

February-2021
Volume 21 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Hu J, Mu H, Gao L, Pan Y, Wu C, Zhang D, Chen Q and Ding H: Diagnostic value of candidate noncoding RNAs in leukocytes of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. Exp Ther Med 21: 145, 2021.
APA
Hu, J., Mu, H., Gao, L., Pan, Y., Wu, C., Zhang, D. ... Ding, H. (2021). Diagnostic value of candidate noncoding RNAs in leukocytes of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 21, 145. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9576
MLA
Hu, J., Mu, H., Gao, L., Pan, Y., Wu, C., Zhang, D., Chen, Q., Ding, H."Diagnostic value of candidate noncoding RNAs in leukocytes of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 21.2 (2021): 145.
Chicago
Hu, J., Mu, H., Gao, L., Pan, Y., Wu, C., Zhang, D., Chen, Q., Ding, H."Diagnostic value of candidate noncoding RNAs in leukocytes of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 21, no. 2 (2021): 145. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9576