Open Access

Improving tissue characterization, differentiation and diagnosis in gynecology with the narrow‑band imaging technique: A systematic review

  • Authors:
    • Panagiotis Peitsidis
    • Nikolaos Vrachnis
    • Stavros Sifakis
    • Christos Katsetos
    • Panagiotis Tsikouras
    • Nikolaos Antonakopoulos
    • Evaggelos Alexopoulos
    • Konstantinos Kalmantis
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 10, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10958
  • Article Number: 36
  • Copyright: © Peitsidis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Narrow‑band imaging (NBI), an on‑demand, real‑time endoscopic imaging technique, was developed to enhance visualization of the mucosal vascular network and surface texture. The present article provides a systematic review of studies that assessed the use of NBI in gynecological endoscopy. The following electronic databases were searched: PubMed (1950‑2020), Google Scholar (2004‑2020) and Cochrane Library (2010‑2020). In the initial search, 3,836 entries were identified, of which 31 were finally included in the systematic review. Of the selected studies, 10 (32%) were case reports, 19 (61.2%) were prospective studies and 2 (6.4%) were randomized controlled trials with control groups. The selected studies reported on the use of NBI in hysteroscopy, laparoscopy and colposcopy. It was revealed that NBI utilization in hysteroscopy increased the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity in detecting malignant and premalignant lesions. NBI improved the specificity and sensitivity in the detection of endometriotic lesions and cervical lesions. Conventional white light endoscopy in gynecology may be significantly improved by the use of NBI. Further studies with larger cohorts and improved design are required to achieve more reliable results. It is of special interest that utilization of this method requires apparatus which is expensive; concerns are the long training and experience of staff required and the long learning curve.

Introduction

Narrow-band imaging (NBI), an on-demand, real-time, endoscopic imaging technique, was developed to enhance the visualization of the mucosal vascular network and surface texture for the purpose of improving tissue differentiation, characterization and diagnosis (1).

The interaction of particular tissue structures with light is wavelength-dependent and augmentation of particular mucosal features via NBI is achieved through observation of light transmission at selected wavelengths (or colors) (2).

In the NBI system, selective light transmittance is conducted via optical filtering of white light (WL). Specifically, NBI uses two discrete bands of light, a blue band at 415 nm and a green band at 540 mm, to create a high-contrast image of the tissue surface, which allows enhanced visualization of blood vessels (3). The two bands correspond to the peak light absorption of hemoglobin, thus permitting NBI to visualize the blood vessels with greater clarity and accuracy on the surface of the analyzed tissues than observation with WL (3).

In clinical practice, there is currently widespread use of NBI to provide an improved examination of the gastrointestinal system, including the stomach and large intestine, esophagus and pharynx, as well as of the lungs, urinary tract and oropharynx. This technique, which has been termed ‘optical biopsy’, has brought achievements of earlier diagnosis by substantially improving the qualitative diagnosis of the depth and grade of invasion of atypical lesions (4).

The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review of all available studies evaluating the use of NBI in gynecology clinical practice for the detection of benign and malignant lesions.

Materials and methods

Search strategy

The following electronic databases were searched: PubMed (1950-2021), Google Scholar (2004-2021) and Cochrane Library (2010-2021). The electronic literature search was mostly performed between January 2020 to February 2021. The search included the following medical subject headings or keywords: ‘Narrow-band imaging’ and ‘gynecology’. The last search was performed on 08/02/2021.

The systematic review was performed and the flowchart diagram was drawn according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metanalyses statement (5).

Inclusion criteria

Full-text articles published in peer-reviewed journals and written in the English language were deemed eligible to be included in the review. Studies that did not fulfill the following criteria were excluded from the review: i) Conference abstracts and studies not providing sufficient clinical data; and ii) studies reporting narrow-band imaging utilization in animals, in surgical specimens or in an in vitro environment.

All types of studies were included, namely randomized controlled or observational studies, case series and case reports. The selected eligible articles were compared and discrepancies were resolved by discussion. The final decision on eligibility was made by the senior investigator (PP) whenever discrepancies had not been resolved through discussion.

Data extraction

Two authors (PP and KK) independently extracted information, while SS, CK, VA, PT and NA checked the extracted information and tabulated the data. NV checked the results and approved the study.

From the eligible studies, the following clinical data were obtained: Author and year of publication; the time period of enrolment of the study population; the country and city in which the study was performed; the type of study; the setting of the hospital (single- or multi-university study); the number of patients; the age of the patients; the inclusion criteria for surgery; the interventions performed; the endoscopic system used in each study; the outcome of the studies; and comments on different studies. The references of the selected studies were scrutinized for additional information not obtained by the initial search.

The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the quality of the primary diagnostic accuracy studies. Via this tool, risks for bias may be evaluated in the following four key domains: i) Selection of participants; ii) index (diagnostic) test; iii) reference standard; and iv) flow and timing of the study (6).

Through the use of the Case Report (CARE) guidelines checklist, the information quality of case reports was evaluated, specifically assessing the following items: Patient information, the presence of timeline information, diagnostic assessment, clinical findings, therapeutic intervention and outcomes (7,8).

Statistical analysis

Data obtained from the selected studies were entered into an Excel v160 spreadsheet (Microsoft Corporation 2018). Descriptive statistical analyses was performed using SPSS version 23 (IBM Corporation) and Excel version 16.0 (Microsoft Corporation, 2018). The number of publications were calculated per year and per country, and the median age of participants in the selected studies was also calculated.

Results

Literature search and selection

The literature search identified a total of 3,836 studies, i.e., 3,800 articles through Google Scholar, 32 articles through the PubMed database and four through the Cochrane Library database. The flowchart of the study selection process is displayed in Fig. 1. After removing duplicates and irrelevant articles, 256 articles were considered for further evaluation. Further assessment excluded 215 articles for various reasons (non-eligible, non-English literature, animal studies and articles providing insufficient information). Finally, 31 studies reporting on a total of 3,128 female patients were included in the review.

Of the selected studies, 10 (32%) were case reports (9-18), 19 (61.2%) were prospective studies (11,12,18-32) and two studies (6.4%) were randomized controlled trials (33,34). The selected studies had publication dates ranging from 2007 to 2020.

The frequency of publications per year and the percentage of publications by country are presented in Fig. 2. The years with the highest frequency of publications were 2010 and 2011 with 5 studies produced each year and the country which produced the highest number of studies was Japan with 11 studies (13,18,21,22,28,31-33,35), followed by Italy with 8 studies (9,10,15-17,19,20,36).

Study properties

A total of 11 studies described the use of NBI in hysteroscopy for the detection of endometrial pathologies (9,10,19-25,36,37) and another 11 studies reported the use of NBI in laparoscopy for the detection of peritoneal endometriosis (11-13,26-30,33,34,37,38). Furthermore, three articles dealt with the use of NBI in digital colposcopy for the detection of lower genital tract pathologies (14,31,32) and three articles reported on the use of NBI in laparoscopy for the detection of peritoneal metastases associated with ovarian cancer and other gynecological malignancies (15-17).

NBI in endometrial pathology

Details on the selected studies reporting the use of NBI in hysteroscopy are presented in Table I. A total of 11 studies were included in the review, dating from 2009-2020 with a combined cohort of 2,424 female patients (9,10,19-25,36,37). Of these, eight studies were prospective studies (Canadian Task Force classification, II-2) (19,23,36) and two studies were case reports (9,10). All studies were designed in university settings, two studies were performed in multicentric university settings (20,36) and two studies were reported at international congresses as conference reports (10,24). All of the patients presented with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). The median age of the patients was 45.5±10.5 years. A total of four studies were performed in outpatient office settings using a vaginoscopic approach without any general anesthesia (19,21,23,36). Conventional hysteroscopy under general anesthesia was performed in seven studies (10,24,25). Operative hysteroscopy was performed in all cases and histology specimens were obtained in each case. Olympus Exera II (Olympus Corporation) was the main video system used in the majority of studies.

Table I

Comparison of studies reporting on the use of hysteroscopy with NBI.

Table I

Comparison of studies reporting on the use of hysteroscopy with NBI.

Author (year)Time periodCountry, cityType of studyInstitutesNumber of subjectsAge, yearsInclusion criteriaInterventionsSystemOutcomesConclusion(Refs.)
Surico, et al (2009)2009Italy, NovaraCase reportSingle univ.1NSAUBConventional hysteroscopy 30˚ 4 mm WL&NBI in G2 endometrial CAOlympus Exera IIDetection of atypical irregular microvesselsNBI was able to increase accuracy in hysteroscopic detection of hyperplasia and endometrial CA(9)
Cicinelli, et al (2010)2008-2009Italy, BariProspective controlledSingle univ.39542.6±10.7AUBFluid minihysteroscopy 105˚ 2.7 mm WL & NBI office setting without anesthesia compared with histologyOlympus Exera IIIncreased sensitivity of NBI vs. WL: Proliferating endometrium, 0.93 vs. 0.78, P<0.005; chronic endometritis, 0.88 vs. 0.70, P<0.005; LRH, 0.88 vs. 0.70, P<0.05; HRH, 0.60 vs. 0.40, P<0.05NBI increased sensitivity, decreased false negative biopsies and increased sensitivity in detecting endometrial pathology(19)
Surico, et al (2010)2007-2008Italy, NovaraProspective controlledMulti univ.20959±11AUB PMBHysteroscopy 5 mm WL&NBI with a 1.5 mm operating channel under general anesthesia compared with histologyOlympus Exera IIIncreased sensitivity of NBI vs. WL in endometrial CA detection 94.7 vs. 84.4% hyperplasia detection 78.38 vs. 64.86% slight decrease in specificity (P>0.05)NBI use by an experienced surgeon may increase diagnostic accuracy(20)
Kisu, et al (2011)2009-2010Japan, TokyoProspective controlledSingle univ.104NSAUBFlexible hysterofiberscope 3.1 mm WL&NBI office setting without anesthesia compared with histologyOlympus Xenon LightIncreased sensitivity of NBI vs. WL for atypical endometrial hyperplasia 97.2 vs. 82.6% P<0.005NBI may be a useful tool in the detection of malignant endometrial lesions(21)
Kuroda, et al (2011)2009Japan, TokyoProspective controlledSingle univ.1440-42AUBRigid 3.8 mm hysteroscopy Flexible 4 mm hysteroscopy with WL and NBI under GA in 6 cases with submucous myoma and 8 cases with normal endometriumOlympus Xenon LightFlexible scope in WL showed greater vascular densities than with rigid scope NBI with rigid and flexible scope did not show statistically significantly increased vascular densitiesNBI may be a useful technology in the detection of malignant cells exhibiting neoangiogenesis. NBI has superior ability in observing the endometrial cavity because no high fluid pressure is required(22)
Kisu, et al (2011)2009-2010Japan, TokyoProspectiveSingle univ.7141.9±12.5AUBFlexible hysterofiberoscope 3.1 mm WL&NBI in office setting without anesthesia compared with histology findingsOlympus Xenon LightHigher sensitivity for hyperplasia and CA of endometrium for all raters with NBI. Average sensitivity was significantly higher in NBI group compared to WL (78.6 vs. 63.7%, P<0.001)NBI system allows better view of the mucosal blood vessels than WL. Larger studies with randomization design required to establish conclusions(23)
Tinelli, et al (2011)2008-2010Italy, BariProspectiveMulti univ.80141.9±9.8AUBFluid minihysteroscopy 2.7 mm WL & NBI in office setting without anesthesia compared with histologyOlympus Exera IINBI increased sensitivity for endometrial CA to 93 vs. 81%, P<0.05; for LRH to 82 vs. 56%, P<0.05; and for HRH to 60 vs. 20%, P<0.005. No alterations in specificity and NPVNBI increased sensitivity in detecting LRH, HRH and endometrial CA. A useful tool for reducing missed pathologies and unnecessary biopsies. NBI increased recognition of preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions misdiagnosed as benign by WL hysteroscopy(26)
Raimondo, et al (2012)2012Italy, RomeCase reportSingle univer.154AUBNBI-hysteroscopy under GA anesthesia 30-degree 4-mm biopsy of endometrial lesionsOlympus Exera IIExhibition of vascular network consistent with adenomyosis. Histology confirmed adenomyosisNBI in hysteroscopy may be a useful tool in the detection of adenomyosis(10)
Kong, et al (2015)2011-2013China, BeijingProspectiveSingle univ.21343AUBConventional hysteroscopy 5 mm WL&NBI under general anesthesia compared with histologyNSNBI increased sensitivity for endometrial CA to 98.1 vs. 73.6% P<0.001; for LRH to 79.6 vs. 49%, P=0.003; and for HRH to 93.5 vs. 82.6%, P=0.006NBI increased sensitivity in detecting LRH, HRH and endometrial CA(24)
Ozturk, et al (2016)2010-2011Turkey, AnkaraProspectiveSingle univ.8640AUB n=71 PMB n=15Hysteroscopy 5 mm WL&NBI with a 1.5 mm operating channel under general anesthesia compared with histologyOlympus Exera IIDetection of 7 cases of endometritis with NBI and of 1 case of endometritis with WL (7/8, 87%, 95%CI 0.52-0.97)NBI may be useful combined with WL in detecting conditions such as chronic endometritis(25)
Wang, et al (2020)2012-2014China, BeijingProspectiveSingle univ.52940.3No symptomsHysteroscopy 5 mm WL&NBI with a 1.5 mm operating channel under general anesthesia compared with histologyOlympus Exera IIThree levels of trainees achieved higher diagnostic accuracy with NBI utilization than with WL during hysteroscopyNBI may increase the skill of trainees, particularly those with previous training(37)

[i] AUB, abnormal uterine bleeding, PMB, postmenstrual bleeding; NBI, narrow-band imaging; WL, white light; HRH, high-risk hyperplasia; LRH, low-risk hyperplasia; CA, carcinoma/cancer; univ. university, GA-General Anesthesia.

NBI hysteroscopy demonstrated increased sensitivity compared with WL imaging hysteroscopy for the detection of endometrial cancer in four studies (20,23,24).

The sensitivity of NBI and WL hysteroscopy for endometrial cancer reported by individual studies was 78.6 vs. 63.7%, P<0.001(23), 93 vs. 81%, P<0.05(36), 94.7 vs. 84.4%, P<0.05(20) and 98.1 vs. 73.6% P<0.001(24). Increased sensitivity of NBI vs. WL for the detection of atypical endometrial hyperplasia - high-risk hyperplasia (HRH) was reported in five studies (10,20-23). The reported sensitivity of NBI vs. WL for HRH was 60 vs. 20%, P<0.005(36), 78.38 vs. 64.86%, P<0.005(20), 78.6 vs. 63.7%, P<0.001(23), 93.5 vs. 82.6%, P=0.006(24) and 97.2 vs. 82.6%, P<0.005(21).

None of the 11 studies reported any adverse effects or complications related to the surgical techniques in all instances.

NBI in endometriosis

Details on the selected studies reporting on the use of NBI in laparoscopy for the detection of peritoneal endometriosis are provided in Table II. A total of 11 studies were included in the present review, dating from 2007 to 2019 with a population of 626 female patients in total (11-13,26-30,33,34,38). The mean age was 35.5±3.6 years. A total of three studies were case reports (11,12,29), three were studies with a randomized design (13,34,38) and five were had a prospective design lacking randomization (26-29,33). In all studies, laparoscopy with a 0-degree 10-mm scope was performed, except for two studies where intestinal endoscopy was utilized (13), while one study reported on the use of a 0-degree 12-mm scope (30). NBI improved the detection rate by 53% for smaller endometriotic lesions previously not detected on WL imaging laparoscopy (26). Another study reported that 82.7% of endometriotic lesions were detected using NBI compared with 55.9% of lesions detected by WL imaging (27). The detection rate of endometriotic lesions with NBI was 100% in a randomized controlled trial with 167 female patients (34). Another randomized controlled trial assessed quality of life in two study groups: One group underwent laparoscopy with WL and the other with NBI. No difference in pain and quality of life was observed between the two study groups (34). When combined with WL, NBI was reported to provide an additional predictive value of 86% for the detection of endometriotic lesions, if a positive diagnosis was made under WL imaging alone (29). NBI and WL combined with 3D imaging was able to increase the sensitivity rate up to 91% (13).

Table II

Comparison of studies reporting on the use of NBI in patients with endometriosis.

Table II

Comparison of studies reporting on the use of NBI in patients with endometriosis.

Author (year)Time periodLocationType of studyInstitutesNumber of subjectsMedian age, yearsInclusion criteriaInterventionsSystemOutcomesConclusion(Refs.)
Farrugia, et al (2007)2007UK, East KentCase reportSingle univer.1NSSuspected endometriosisLaparoscopy 0-degree 10-mm with WL&NBI; spectrum, 415 nm; excision of lesionsOlympus Exera IIIdentification of smaller lesions of endometriosisNBI may help distinguish active endometriosis from fibrosis and changes from previous surgery(11)
Barrueto, et al (2008)2008USA, BaltimoreProspective oilotSingle univer.2136Suspected endometriosisLaparoscopy 0-degree 10-mm with WL&NBI; spectrum, 415 & 540 nm; excision of lesionsOlympus Exera II14 patients had lesions identified by NBI, previously not detected by WL. 38 biopsy specimens were taken using NBI; 20 (53%) confirmed endometriosisNBI may be able to better identify the smaller lesions and excise a maximum number of lesions, thus delaying the recurrence of endometriosis(26)
Chandakas, et al (2008)2008Greece, AthensProspective pilotMulti univer.9533.9Suspected endometriosisLaparoscopy 0-degree 10-mm with WL&NBI; spectrum, 415 & 540 nm; excision of lesionsOlympus Exera IILesions were collected from 95 patients, 82.7% of the endometriotic lesions detected by NBI and 55.9% detected by WLNBI may detect endometriotic lesions more easily than WL(27)
Kuroda, et al (2009)2009Japan, TokyoProspective pilotSingle univer.2335Suspected endometriosisLaparoscopy 0-degree 10-mm with WL&NBI; measurement of vascular density (red, black, white) lesions in peritoneal endometriosis with vascular analysis softwareOlympus Exera II23 patients diagnosed with peritoneal endometriosis. Median difference of vascular density by NBI was significantly higher in red lesions (4.5%, P<0.001)NBI provides an accurate objective evaluation of vascular density, particularly for the red lesions, which are indicative of early-stage endometriosis with angiogenesis(28)
Kuroda, et al (2010)2008Japan, TokyoProspective controlSingle univer.7324-49Suspected endometriosisLaparoscopy 0-degree 10-mm with WL&NBI; Patients allocated to 4 groups: i) Endometriosis group with GnRH; ii) Endometriosis group no GnRH; iii) non-endometriosis group with GnRH; iv) non-endometriosis group no GnRH. Assessment of peritoneal vascular density with vascular analysis software and cytokine concentration in peritoneal fluid in 4 groupsOlympus Exera IIIncreased vascular density detected by NBI in patients with endometriosis (P<0.01). Increased cytokine levels in patients with endometriosisNBI may detect early vascular lesions in patients with endometriosis(33)
Barrueto, et al (2015)2015USA, BaltimoreRandomized controlledMulti univer.16730-33.6Suspected endometriosisLaparoscopy 0-degree 10-mm. All patients received WL/WL (Control arm) or WL/NBI (Intervention arm). Spectrum, 415 & 540 nm; excision of lesionsOlympus Exera II255 lesions were detected and confirmed as endometriosis. 255 (100%) were detected by NBIThe contribution of NBI to WL increased the detection of endometriotic lesions(34)
Gallichio, et al (2015)2011-2013USA, BaltimoreRandomized controlledMulti univer.16730-33.2Suspected endometriosisLaparoscopy 0-degree 10-mm. All patients received WL (3:1 ratio) followed by WL/NBI or WL/WL. Pain and quality of life assessment with questionnaire EHP*Olympus WinterPain and quality of life similar in both study groups (WL vs. NBI)WL and NBI have similar pain and quality of life outcomes(38)
Murnaghan, et al (2017)2017Canada OttawaCase reportSingle univer.139Suspected endometriosisLaparoscopy 0-degree 10-mm with WL/NBI; excision of lesionsOlympus Exera IIIdentification of smaller lesions not visible with WLContribution of NBI to WL increased the detection of endometriotic lesions(12)
Ma, et al (2019)2014-2015Australia, VictoriaProspective controlSingle univer.5730Suspected endometriosisLaparoscopy 0-degree 5-mm with WL&NBI. Excision of lesionsOlympus Exera IITotal 32 patients with lesions detected by WL. 24 of them were positive for Endometriosis. Assessment of these 24 with NBI led to diagnosis of 6 new positions of endometriosis. Additional predic tive value of 86% if a positive diagnosis was made under WL imagingNBI appears beneficial in identifying new areas of endometriosis that may be missed if endometriosis is suspected by WL. NBI was not beneficial if WL was negative(29)
Kazama, et al (2019)2018Japan, SaitamaCase reportSingle univer.144Pelvic pain Occult fecal bloodIntestinal endoscopy with WL&NBINSLesions of rectal endometriosis (Dienogest treatment)NBI may assist in the detection of small lesions in cases of intestinal endometriosis(13)
Lier, et al (2020)2016-2017Netherlands, AmsterdamProspective randomizedSingle univer.2034.5Endometriosis III-IV (ASRM)Laparoscopy 0-degree 12-mm with WL, NBI, NIR-ICG and 3D imaging. Excision of lesionsOlympus Exera II3D increased the sensitivity rate (P=0.0016). Combined 3D and NBI increased the sensitivity rate 91.2% (P<0.001)3D WL combined with NBI improved the detection rate of peritoneal endometriosis(30)

[i] NBI, narrow-band imaging; WL, white light; NS, not stated; NIR-ICG, near-infrared imaging with indocyanine green; univ. university; EHP, endometriosis health profile.

Olympus Exetera (Olympus Corporation) was the system used for NBI in all of the studies. None of the 11 studies reported any adverse effects or complications related to the surgical techniques.

NBI in cervical pathology and peritoneal implants

Details on the selected studies reporting on the use of NBI in laparoscopy for the detection of cervical lesions and gynecological malignancies are listed in Table III. A total of 9 studies were included in the review, dating from 2010 to 2020. Of these, four studies were prospective studies (31,32,35,39) and five studies were case reports (14-18). The total number of patients was 156 and the mean age was 43.3±17.25 years. Uterine cervical pathology was investigated with NBI in five studies (14,18,31,32,35) and peritoneal implants were investigated with NBI in four studies (15-17,39).

Table III

Comparison of studies reporting on the use of NBI in patients with cervical pathology and peritoneal implants.

Table III

Comparison of studies reporting on the use of NBI in patients with cervical pathology and peritoneal implants.

Author (year)Time periodCountry, cityType of studyInstituteNumber of subjectsAge, yearsInclusion criteriaInterventionsSystemOutcomesConclusion(Refs.)
Fujii, et al (2010)2007-2009Japan, TokyoProspective pilotSingle univer.2136.3Patients with diagnosis of in situ cervical adenoCA early cervical adenoCANBI digital colposcopy; biopsy of lesions and immunochemistry with CD31 antibody; evaluation of vascular patternOlympusVascular pattern was classified as waste thread-like pattern, dot-like pattern and root-like pattern. Vascular patterns were displayed in 18 (86%) of cases of cervical adenoCADigital NBI colposcopy depicts vascular pattern on cervix more clearly than conventional colposcopy, thus diagnosing early disease(31)
Fanfani, et al (2010)2010Italy, RomeCase reportSingle univer.1NSBorderline ovaryLaparoscopy 0-degree 10-mm with WL&NBI. Excision of lesionsOlympus Exera IIIdentification of peritoneal implants not clearly visible by WLNBI in laparoscopy a useful advancement for identifying early preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions and assisting in making intraoperative decisions(15)
Fanfani, et al (2011)2011Italy, RomeCase reportSingle univer.1NSCervical CALaparoscopy 0-degree 10-mm with WL&NBI. Excision of lesionsOlympus Exera IIIdentification of peritoneal implants not clearly visible by WL in a case after laparoscopic hysterectomy for cervical CANBI may a useful tool in the detection of early neoplastic peritoneal implants(16)
Gagliardi, et al (2013)2013Italy, RomaCase reportSingle univer.21st 632nd 67Recurrent Ovarian CA 1 case of FIGO IC and 1 case of FIGO IIICLaparoscopy 0-degree 10-mm with WL&NBIOlympus WinterIdentification and NBI target biopsy of peritoneal implants of recurrent diseaseNBI facilitates diagnosis of recurrence of malignant disease(17)
Nishyama, et al (2017)2014-2015Japan, KagawaProspective pilotSingle univer.1039Patients with squamous cervical pathology LGSIL-cervical CAFlexible magnifying endoscopy with NBI evaluating microvascular patterns. Colposcopy and biopsy of lesionsOlympus Exera IIReport of NBI-ME microvascular findings as follows: -Presence of dots in 7 (70 %) -Irregular arrangement of dots in 5 (50%) -High-density of dots in 5 (50%) -High vessel caliber in 2 (20%) -New tumor vessel in 1 (10%) -Detection rate, 90% (9/10 patients)Establishment of a novel microvascular classification system via NBI-ME of cervical lesions(32)
Aloisi, et al (2018)2011-2014USA, New YorkProspective ComparativeSingle univer.9455.5Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for gynecologic CA of all typesLaparoscopy 0-degree 10-mm with WL&NBIOlympus Exera IIHigher number of peritoneal abnormalities detected by NBI vs. WL (P=0.0239). No scientific significance in the detection of peritoneal metastasis (P=0.18)NBI provides unique contrast between peritoneum and microvascular patterns. NBI does not provide better detection of peritoneal malignancy than WL(39)
Uchita, et al (2018)2016JapanProspective diagnosticMulti univer.2440Patients underwent colposcopy and NBI of cervix. Patients underwent conisationNBI with gastroscopeOlympusNBI revealed 3 abnormal findings: -Light white epithelium -Heavy white epithelium -Atypical intracapillary papillary loopNBI demonstrated 100% sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value for lesions >CIN-3(35)
Anko, et al (2019)2020Japan, KanagawaCase reportSingle univer.154Patient with melanoma of cervixNBI digital colposcopyNSReport of atypical vessels and transparent mucosal surfaceNBI colposcopy may be useful in melanoma diagnosis(14)
Kobara, et al (2020)2020Japan, KagawaCase reportMulti univer.239, 37Patients with cervical HGSILNBI with gastroscopeOlympusDetection of atypical lesion not identified by colposcopyNBI may assist in the diagnosis of HGSIL if not identified by(18)

[i] NBI, narrow-band imaging; WL, white light; NS, not stated; HGSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; LGSIL, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; CA, carcinoma/cancer; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; univ. university; CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

The vascular pattern of lesions was examined in 21 patients with early and in situ cervical adenocarcinoma using NBI (13). The authors classified the colposcopic lesions according to the pattern described by Wright (40). The vascular pattern was visualized in 18 patients (86%); the authors concluded that NBI colposcopy depicts the vascular pattern on the cervix in early glandular disease better than conventional colposcopy. Nishiyama et al (32) proposed a novel microvascular classification. They used flexible magnifying endoscopy with NBI in 10 patients with cervical lesions; the detection rate was 90% (9/10) (32). NBI assisted in the detection of a rare melanoma of the cervix in a case report (14). Furthermore, NBI was utilized in laparoscopy for the detection of peritoneal metastasis in a series of 95 female patients undergoing surgery for various gynecological malignancies, as reported by Aloisi et al (39). They determined that NBI increased the number of the detected peritoneal abnormalities; however, no statistically significant differences were observed in the identification of histologically confirmed metastatic disease (P=0.18) (39).

A significantly greater number of peritoneal abnormalities were identified with NBI than with standard WL imaging. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in the identification of histologically confirmed metastatic disease (39). In addition, NBI proved to be useful in the laparoscopic detection of early peritoneal implants in three case reports (15-17). Kobara et al (18) indicated that NBI increased the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value for the detection of cervical intraepithelial lesions-3 (CIN-3) in comparison with conventional colposcopy. NBI with a gastroscope assisted the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions in two patients, while these lesions were not identified by conventional colposcopy (18,35). None of the nine studies reported any adverse effects or complications related to the surgical techniques.

Quality assessment of case reports

The CARE guidelines were followed to perform the quality assessment of the case reports (7). A total of 10 case reports were assessed for their quality (9-18). The results are presented in Fig. 3. Approximately 30% of the case reports had a low quality in terms of presentation of demographic information. In total, 55% of the case reports included had low quality regarding the presentation of the patients' history with timeline information. Furthermore, 45% of the case reports were of poor quality in terms of information about differential diagnosis.

Quality assessment with QUADAS-2

The QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias in four domains. The results are presented in Fig. 4. In total, 19 studies were assessed. Of these, 17 had a prospective design lacking randomization and two were randomized controlled trials with control groups. A total of 9 studies were indicated to have a high risk of bias (24,25,27,29,30-32,34,36) and 10 studies were determined to have a low risk of bias (19-21,23,28,30,32,37-39).

NBI in gynecological endoscopy and special precautions in view of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has produced a public health emergency of international concern, with all of the data demonstrating that the spread of the virus mainly occurs via respiratory droplets during close contact (41,42). During this ongoing pandemic, recommendations regarding laparoscopy and endoscopy with NBI should follow the general international recommendations for laparoscopy.

However, the potential risk of infection through endoscopically generated bioaerosols may possibly be increased as a result of three important factors pertaining to laparoscopy. These are the following: i) Use of gas insufflation during entry and intra-operatively; ii) generation of bioaerosols via electrosurgery, which is a cornerstone of endoscopy; and iii) the potential for gas leaks in the operation room, which may lead to elevated viral loads in the air (41,42). Precautions should be taken during gynecological endoscopy with NBI, adhering to the international recommendations concerning SARS-CoV-2 (41-43).

Regarding elective surgery, it is recommended that universal testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection is conducted whenever possible within 40 h preceding surgery. Should a case of SARS-CoV-2 be positively confirmed, it is advisable to delay surgery, although exceptions may be made for urgent cases, e.g. malignancies.

It has been reported that laparoscopies have a larger potential for aerosol spread than hysteroscopies (41-43), while laparotomies have a lower risk of aerosol spread in comparison to laparoscopies (41-43). However, endoscopy is generally preferred due to the one-day stay and the smaller exposure to a hospital environment.

Strict safety measures regarding the pressure of the gas and pressure of the fluid should be applied to minimize the possibility of spread. In cases where local anesthesia may be used, it is expected to be beneficial for the patient, minimizing the risk of infection, which may occur after the intubation and the extubation procedure.

Further guidelines issued by the different medical associations such as International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE; www.isge.org) and American Society of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL; https://www.aagl.org/) (42,43) will provide additional pertinent and vital data during the current fight against the pandemic.

Strengths and limitations

NBI, which is now regularly used in gynecology, is a relatively new optical technology and the present systematic review is, to the best of our knowledge, the most updated and extensive of its kind that has been provided on this method to date. Due to the relatively small number of randomized controlled trials, observational studies were included in spite of providing a lower level of evidence. While precise and clear inclusion criteria were employed for the preparation of the present review, the small sample size of the trials included and the overall absence of definitions of primary outcomes inevitably reduced the quality of the present review. Furthermore, risk of bias in the flow and timing domains was frequently present. Therefore, it was not possible to perform a pooled data-analysis or meta-analysis. While case reports were included, the majority of these studies were well-designed and mostly provided their evidence clearly and accurately, according to the quality assessment using the CARE (Case report) guidelines.

Discussion

The NBI system for image-enhanced endoscopy was first conceived and developed in May 1999 and the product was launched by Olympus Corporation in May 2006(21).

The major advantages of the NBI system are the enhancement of endoscopic visualization of superficial neoplastic lesions and their microvascular architecture. Conventional endoscopic diagnosis using WL, by contrast, is based on subtle morphological changes, e.g., superficially elevated, flat or depressed lesions, and on minimal changes in color such as reddish discoloration (19).

The present systematic review demonstrated that the application of NBI in gynecological endoscopy has the potential to improve the diagnosis of endometriosis. It may also have the potential to enhance the diagnosis of premalignant and malignant lesions in the fields of hysteroscopy, laparoscopy and colposcopy.

While Kisu et al (44) performed a review in 2012, the present systematic review is substantially updated and includes quality assessment of the studies according to the QUADAS-2 and the CARE guidelines (6,7).

NBI has proven to be an efficacious approach for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia, while thorough training improves the trainee's diagnostic skills to an extent depending on their previous hysteroscopic experience (37). However, it must be stressed that NBI laparoscopy was not superior in the detection of peritoneal metastases in comparison with standard WL laparoscopy alone, which was reported by Aloisi et al (39) and Schnelldorfer et al (45).

A significantly greater number of peritoneal abnormalities were identified with NBI than with standard WL. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in the identification of histologically confirmed metastatic disease. In fact, of the eight additional suspicious-appearing nodules visualized with NBI, only three were confirmed as malignant on final pathology, and none of the patients had surface malignancies identified with NBI that were not also seen with WL, even if in a different area (39). Aloisi et al (39) pointed out that further exploration of the use of NBI/3D WL imaging is required; this will now be further evaluated in a large randomized clinical trial with clinically relevant endpoints, with adequate power, quality control and measures (44). This will be according to the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term Study (IDEAL) framework, describing 5 stages of evolution for new surgical therapeutic interventions. IDEAL is an important driver for future incremental and evidence-based modifications (46).

Furthermore, another limitation is the extension of the surgical time, particularly in laparoscopic procedures with the use of NBI. Lier et al (30) reported a median extension of surgical time of 30 min with NBI due to thorough inspection of the peritoneum and histological sampling. The clinical question is whether an improved detection of endometriosis with NBI/3D imaging also affects the long-term clinical outcomes after surgery, such as reintervention rates, pain-free interval and quality of life (30).

A shortcoming, particularly with the methodology reported by Barrueto et al (34), is the low specificity. This may result in unnecessary resection of healthy tissue, producing postoperative neuropathic pain and adhesion formation.

In the study by Surico et al (20), only a small number of patients were recruited, while the study was performed at a single academic institution. Furthermore, the accuracy of NBI hysteroscopy in the prediction of histological findings via analysis of interobserver variability was not assessed (20).

Wang et al (37) reported that the physician who performs hysteroscopy must be familiar with endometrial lesions, which are influenced by estrogen and progesterone secretion. Endometrial necrosis may not only be observed in malignant lesions, but also frequently appears in benign hyperplastic lesions associated with abnormal uterine bleeding. These factors increase the difficulty of hysteroscopic diagnosis; therefore, the learning curve for the diagnosis of endometrial neoplasms is relatively long. The authors report that >200 hysteroscopic cases are required to be performed by physicians until proficiency is reached (37).

The drawback of NBI colposcopy is that the system is expensive; thus, widespread use of it is limited and is particularly unsuitable for application in developing countries. It may be appropriate to use for educational purposes in cancer center hospitals or university hospitals (31).

In conclusion, conventional WL imaging in gynecological endoscopy is now well-established as a highly sensitive and specific technique for the diagnosis of intrauterine diseases and the present study clearly indicated that the NBI system, when applied by an expert and experienced surgeon, is capable of enhancing diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, NBI may increase the diagnostic skills of trainees. Future directions of research should take into consideration the reoperation rates, recurrence and overall cost. Evidence-based frameworks such as IDEAL should be implemented in order to improve clinical practice. Certainly, there is a requirement for large-scale, multicenter, randomized trials to substantiate the present results as to the potential for use of NBI in gynecology, the application of which may improve patients' oncological outcomes and thus their quality of life.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Emeritus Professor George Iatrakis of University of West Attica (Athens, Greece) for assisting us in obtaining the full-text of articles.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

All authors contributed equally to the writing and production of this manuscript. PP and KK extracted information, SS, CK, EA, PT and NA interpreted the extracted information and tabulated the data. NV checked the results and approved the study. PP was the main author that formed the conception of the study. EA checked for the eligibility of the studies. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. PP and NV confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Vincent BD and Fraig M: A pilot study of narrow-band imaging compared to white light bronchoscopy for evaluation of normal airways and premalignant and malignant airways disease. Chest. 131:1794–1199. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Sano Y and Horimatsu T: Magnifying observation of microvascular architecture of colorectal lesions using a narrow-band imaging system. Dig Endosc. 18:44–51. 2006.

3 

Watanabe A and Taniguchi M: The value of narrow band imaging endoscope for early head and neck cancers. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 138:446–451. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Machida H, Sano Y, Hamamoto Y, Muto M, Kozu T, Tajiri H and Yoshida S: Narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of colorectal mucosal lesions: A pilot study. Endoscopy. 36:1094–1098. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J and Moher D: The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 339(b2700)2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MM, Sterne JA and Bossuyt PM: QUADAS-2 Group. QUADAS-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 155:529–536. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H and Riley D: CARE Group. The CARE guidelines: Consensus-based clinical case report guideline development. J Clin Epidemiol. 67:46–51. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Tulandi T and Balayla J: Study designs and the use of the canadian task force classification. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 40:1383–1384. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Surico D, Vigone A and Leo L: Narrow band imaging in endometrial lesions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 16:9–10. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Raimondo I, Scarciglia ML, Amadio G, Monterisi AF, Scambia G and Masciullo V: Narrow band imaging: А new diagnostic tool in adenomyosis? Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 119:S531–S867. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Farrugia M, Nair MS and Kotronis KV: Narrow band imaging in endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 14:393–394. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Murnaghan O, Rajakumar C, Bougie O and Singh SS: Use of narrowband imaging for the surgical management of endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 39(711)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Kazama S, Hiramatsu T, Kuroda K, Hongo K, Watanabe Y, Tanaka T and Kuriki K: A case of unique endoscopic findings of intestinal endometriosis exposed to the mucosa: Aggregation of papillary protruded bulges from the submucosal elevation of the rectum. Clin J Gastroenterol. 12:166–170. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Anko M, Nakamura M, Kobayashi Y, Tsuji K, Nakada S, Nakamura Y, Funakoshi T, Banno K and Aoki D: Primary malignant melanoma of the uterine cervix or vagina which were successfully treated with nivolumab. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 46:190–195. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Fanfani F, Gallotta V, Rossitto C, Fagotti A and Scambia G: Narrow band imaging in borderline ovarian tumor. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 17:146–147. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Fanfani F, Rossito C, Faggotti A, Gallotta V, Gagliardi ML and Scambia G: Narrow-band imaging in laparoscopic management of cervical carcinoma. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 18:146–147. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Gagliardi ML, Polito S, Fagotti A, Fanfani F and Scambia G: Narrow-band imaging in laparoscopic management of recurrent platinum sensitive ovarian cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 20:10–12. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Kobara H, Uchita K, Uedo N, Matsuura N, Nishiyama N, Kanenishi K and Masaki T: Uterine cervical neoplasm diagnosed by flexible magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging. Diagnostics (Basel). 10(903)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Cicinelli E, Tinelli R, Colafiglio G, Pastore A, Mastrolia S, Lepera A and Clevin L: Reliability of narrow-band imaging (NBI) hysteroscopy: A comparative study. Fertil Steril. 94:2303–2307. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Surico D, Vigone A, Bonvini D, Tinelli R, Leo L and Surico N: Narrow-band imaging in diagnosis of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia: A new option? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 17:620–625. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Kisu I, Banno K, Kobayashi Y, Ono A, Masuda K, Ueki A, Nomura H, Hirasawa A, Abe T, Kouyama K, et al: Flexible hysteroscopy with narrow band imaging (NBI) for endoscopic diagnosis of malignant endometrial lesions. Int J Oncol. 38:613–618. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Kuroda K, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Kumakiri J, Matsuoka S, Tokita S, Kuroda M and Takeda S: A new instrument: A flexible hysteroscope with narrow band imaging system: Optical quality comparison between a flexible and a rigid hysteroscope. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 20:263–266. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Kisu I, Banno K, Susumu N and Aoki D: Magnifying hysteroscopy with narrow-band imaging for visualization of endometrial lesions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 115(1):74–5. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Kong L, Duan H, Zhang Y, Wang Y and Guo Y: Application of narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of endometrial lesions. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 22(S45)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Ozturk M, Ulubay M, Alanbay I, Keskin U, Karasahin E and Yenen MC: Using narrow-band imaging with conventional hysteroscopy increases the detection of chronic endometritis in abnormal uterine bleeding and postmenopausal bleeding. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 42:67–71. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Barrueto FF and Audlin KM: The use of narrowband imaging for identification of endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 15:636–639. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Chandakas S, Salamalekis E and Erian J: New narrow band imaging endoscopic system for the detectionof surface pathology including endometriosis: A series of 95 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 15:S1–S159. 2008.

28 

Kuroda K, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Kumakiri J, Matsuoka S, Jinushi M, Shirai Y, Kuroda M and Takeda S: Vascular density of peritoneal endometriosis using narrow-band imaging system and vascular analysis software. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 16:618–621. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Ma T, Chowdary P, Eskander A, Ellett L, McIlwaine K, Manwaring J, Readman E and Maher P: Can narrowband imaging improve the laparoscopic identification of superficial endometriosis? A prospective cohort trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 26:427–433. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Lier MC, Vlek SL, Ankersmit M, van de Ven PM, Dekker JJML, Bleeker MCG, Mijatovic V and Tuynman JB: Comparison of enhanced laparoscopic imaging techniques in endometriosis surgery: A diagnostic accuracy study. Surg Endosc. 34:96–104. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Fujii T, Nakamura M, Kameyama K, Saito M, Nishio H, Ohno A, Hirao N, Iwata T, Tsukazaki K and Aoki D: Digital colposcopy for the diagnosis of cervical adenocarcinoma using a narrow band imaging system. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 20:605–610. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Nishiyama N, Kanenishi K, Mori H, Kobara H, Fujihara S, Chiyo T, Kobayashi N, Matsunaga T, Ayaki M, Yachida T, et al: Flexible magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging for the diagnosis of uterine cervical tumors: A cooperative study among gastrointestinal endoscopists and gynecologists to explore a novel microvascular classification system. Oncol Lett. 14:355–362. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Kuroda K, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Kumakiri J, Matsuoka S, Kuroda M and Takeda S: Peritoneal vascular density assessment using narrow-band imaging and vascular analysis software, and cytokine analysis in women with and without endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 17:21–25. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Barrueto FF, Audlin KM, Gallicchio L, Miller C, MacDonald R, Alonsozana E, Johnston M and Helzlsouer KJ: Sensitivity of narrow band imaging compared with white light imaging for the detection of endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 22:846–852. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Uchita K, Kanenishi K, Hirano K, Kobara H, Nishiyama N, Kawada A, Fujihara S, Ibuki E, Haba R, Takahashi Y, et al: Characteristic findings of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or more on magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging. Int J Clin Oncol. 23:707–714. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Tinelli R, Surico D, Leo L, Pinto V, Surico N, Fusco A, Cicinelli MV, Meir YJ and Cicinelli E: Accuracy and efficacy of narrow-band imaging versus white light hysteroscopy for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia: a multicenter controlled study. Menopause. 18:1026–1029. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Wang W, Chen F, Kong L, Guo Y, Cheng J and Zhang Y: Prospective evaluation of the accuracy of a training program in image recognition by narrow-band imaging guided hysteroscopy of endometrial neoplasms. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 85:284–289. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Gallicchio L, Helzlsouer KJ, Audlin KM, Miller C, MacDonald R, Johnston M and Barrueto FF: Change in pain and quality of life among women enrolled in a trial examining the use of narrow band imaging during laparoscopic surgery for suspected endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 22:1208–1214. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Aloisi A, Sonoda Y, Gardner GJ, Park KJ, Elliott SL, Zhou QC, Iasonos A and Abu-Rustum NR: Prospective comparative study of laparoscopic narrow band imaging (NBI) versus standard imaging in gynecologic oncology. Ann Surg Oncol. 25:984–990. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Wright VC: Cervical glandular disease: Adenocarcinoma in situ and adenocarcinoma. In: Colposcopy Principles and Practice. Barbara S, Apgar GL and Spitzer M (eds). 2nd edition. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA, 283Y310, 2008.

41 

Carugno J, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Alonso L, Haimovich S, Campo R, De Angelis C, Bradley L, Bettocchi S, Arias A, Isaacson K, et al: COVID-19 pandemic. Impact on hysteroscopic procedures: A consensus statement from the global congress of hysteroscopy scientific committee. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 27:988–992. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Thomas V, Maillard C, Barnard A, Snyman L, Chrysostomou A, Shimange-Matsose L and Van Herendael B: International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE) guidelines and recommendations on gynecological endoscopy during the evolutionary phases of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 253:133–140. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

43 

American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. COVID-19: Joint Society Statement on Elective Surgery. Available from: http://www.aagl.org/news/covid-19-joint-statement-on-elective-surgeries/.

44 

Kisu I, Banno K, Tsuji K, Masuda K, Ueki A, Kobayashi Y, Yamagami W, Susumu N and Aoki D: Narrow band imaging in gynecology: A new diagnostic approach with improved visual identification (Review). Int J Oncol. 40:350–356. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Schnelldorfer T, Jenkins RL, Birkett DH, Wright VJ, Price LL and Georgakoudi I: Laparoscopic narrow band imaging for detection of occult cancer metastases: A randomized feasibility trial. Surg Endosc. 30:1656–1661. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Hirst A, Philippou Y, Blazeby J, Campbell B, Campbell M, Feinberg J, Rovers M, Blencowe N, Pennell C, Quinn T, et al: No Surgical innovation without evaluation: Evolution and further development of the IDEAL framework and recommendations. Ann Surg. 269:211–220. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

January-2022
Volume 23 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Peitsidis P, Vrachnis N, Sifakis S, Katsetos C, Tsikouras P, Antonakopoulos N, Alexopoulos E and Kalmantis K: Improving tissue characterization, differentiation and diagnosis in gynecology with the narrow‑band imaging technique: A systematic review. Exp Ther Med 23: 36, 2022.
APA
Peitsidis, P., Vrachnis, N., Sifakis, S., Katsetos, C., Tsikouras, P., Antonakopoulos, N. ... Kalmantis, K. (2022). Improving tissue characterization, differentiation and diagnosis in gynecology with the narrow‑band imaging technique: A systematic review. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 23, 36. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10958
MLA
Peitsidis, P., Vrachnis, N., Sifakis, S., Katsetos, C., Tsikouras, P., Antonakopoulos, N., Alexopoulos, E., Kalmantis, K."Improving tissue characterization, differentiation and diagnosis in gynecology with the narrow‑band imaging technique: A systematic review". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 23.1 (2022): 36.
Chicago
Peitsidis, P., Vrachnis, N., Sifakis, S., Katsetos, C., Tsikouras, P., Antonakopoulos, N., Alexopoulos, E., Kalmantis, K."Improving tissue characterization, differentiation and diagnosis in gynecology with the narrow‑band imaging technique: A systematic review". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 23, no. 1 (2022): 36. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10958