Expression profile, clinical significance and biological functions of IGF2BP2 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

  • Authors:
    • Fenying Lu
    • Weichang Chen
    • Tingwang Jiang
    • Cuie Cheng
    • Bin Wang
    • Zhiping Lu
    • Guojin Huang
    • Jiaming Qiu
    • Wei Wei
    • Ming Yang
    • Xia Huang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: February 1, 2022     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2022.11177
  • Article Number: 252
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The ectopic expression of insulin‑like growth factor 2 mRNA‑binding protein 2 (IGF2BP2) has been demonstrated to facilitate tumorigenesis and induce proliferation in a various types of cancer. However, the role of IGF2BP2 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has yet been fully elucidated. In this regard, the current study assessed the expression patterns and clinical significance of IGF2BP2 in 94 Chinese patients diagnosed with ESCC. Immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR assays were employed to assess IGF2BP2 expression in ESCC tissues compared with adjacent healthy tissues. The results revealed that the protein expression of IGF2BP2 was substantially upregulated in ESCC tissues compared with adjacent ESCC tissues. More specifically, higher IGF2BP2 expression strongly associated with tumor node metastasis stage, lymphatic infiltration and lymph node metastasis. Using two ESCC cell lines (TE‑1 and TE‑10), the inhibition of IGF2BP2 expression by small interfering RNA was proven to induce apoptosis and suppress proliferation, migration and cell cycle progression in vitro. Collectively, the present findings indicated that IGF2BP2 may serve a major role in the development of ESCC carcinogenesis. The present study may be helpful in the design of potential drug targets in the treatment of ESCC.

Introduction

Esophageal cancer (EC) has been described as the seventh most frequently diagnosed tumor (1) and the sixth causal agent of cancer mortality with respective new cases and deaths estimated to be 604,000 and 544,000 in 2020, worldwide (2). An annual increase in the incidence and mortality rate of EC has been reported amidst variation with sex and region. In particular, the global incidence rate in men was reported to be three-fold higher than in women and mostly occurred in Southern Africans and Eastern Asians (3). Histologically, the existing two primary EC subtypes are esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). While the former is a more common type of EC in individuals from developing nations, such as China and India, the latter is dominant among Americans (4). Treatments for ESCC vary depending on the stages of the disease: Esophagectomy, neoadjuvant therapy, chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (5). Although several treatment options have been developed, an improved form of treatment is required, due to the poor prognosis and low survival rates associated with a late diagnosis (6). Therefore, it is necessary to identify new potential targets of ESCC through the study of the molecular mechanisms underlying carcinogenesis for improved clinical outcome.

A previous study reported that insulin-like growth factor-2 mRNA-binding protein 2 (IGF2BP2) is a crucial oncogenic protein, functioning as a tumor promoter via post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. IGF2BP2 is implicated in the stabilization, localization and trafficking of target mRNAs involved in carcinogenesis and cancer cell proliferation (7). Mechanistically, IGF2BP2 serves as an mRNA stabilizer for cancer development and proliferation via the IGF2BP2/microRNA (miR)-195/Raf-1 proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase axis in colorectal cancer cells (8), and the methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3)/IGF2BP2/flap endonuclease 1 axis in liver cancer (9). IGF2BP2 upregulation has been reported in several types of human cancer, such as pancreatic cancer (10), glioblastoma (11), hepatic cellular carcinoma (12), acute myeloid leukemia (13) and sarcomas (14). Moreover, IGF2BP2 expression in cancer tissue was positively correlated with poor prognosis and short survival rate of patients with EAC (15). Importantly, IGF2BP2 knockdown suppressed the carcinogenesis, proliferation, invasion and metastasis of colorectal carcinoma (16). Although various evidence has reported the role and mechanisms of IGF2BP2 in several types of cancer, published reports that clarify the association between clinicopathological features and IGF2BP2 expression in ESCC are lacking.

In the present study, the association between IGF2BP2 expression at the protein level and the clinicopathological features of patients with ESCC was studied. The effects of IGF2BP2 knockdown on proliferation, migration and apoptosis were examined in vitro using ESCC cell lines. Based on the present research, it was hypothesized that IGF2BP2 may be a promising therapeutic target for ESCC treatment.

Materials and methods

Preparation of tissue samples and ethical statement

A total of 94 Chinese patients with ESCC (females, 28; males, 66), aged 33-78 years with an average age of 56 years old, gave their written consent to participate in the present study at the Second People's Hospital of Changshu. The inclusion criteria for participation included: i) A diagnosis of esophageal squamous carcinoma via gastroscopy and pathological examination; and ii) no evidence of serious organ dysfunction in the heart, brain, liver, lung and kidney. Patients were excluded for the current study if they: i) Could not tolerate surgery due to severe heart disease; ii) had other serious systemic diseases, such as later stage uremic syndrome; and iii) exhibited esophageal perforation or bleeding. Specimens of human ESCC tissues (n=36) with adjacent tissues of ESCC (n=36) and accompanying normal tissues of esophagus (n=15) were collected from the same patients. Adjacent ESCC tissues were obtained ~20 mm from the primary ESCC tumor, and normal esophagus tissues were obtained ≥50 mm from the ESCC tumor site. The three types of tissues were further identified by an experienced pathologist (JQ) based on their cell morphology and tissue characteristics. The clinicopathological tumor stage was evaluated according to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Union for International Cancer-Control staging guidelines using tumor, nodes and metastasis (TNM) systems of classification (17,18). Histological tumor grade was categorized into three groups: High, middle and low degrees of tumor differentiation, by JM Qiu based on WHO classification (17). Review and approval for the current study was provided by the Ethical committee of Changshu Second People's Hospital at Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, China).

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis and pathological scoring of ESCC tissue staining

Based on a protocol of epitome retrieval (19), the tissues were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature (25±2˚C), embedded in paraffin and cut into 3 µm thick sections. After deparaffinization, the slices were rinsed in water for 10 min, soaked in H2O2 (3%) for 10 min at room temperature and washed twice further in water. The slices were then immersed in citric acid buffer (pH 6.0) for 7 min and boiled for 15 min to expose the site of antigens. After cooling to room temperature, the slices were washed twice in PBS, and 4% skimmed milk powder was added for the blocking of non-specific binding sites in ESCC tissues at 37˚C for 30 min. Subsequently, sections were incubated for 1 h at 37˚C with rabbit monoclonal anti-IGF2BP2 antibodies (1:200; cat. no ab124930; Abcam) mixed with milk powder (skimmed, 2%) to minimize unspecific staining. A biotinylated secondary antibody (1:1,000; cat. no. ab6721; Abcam) was then added for 30 min at 37˚C, after which IHC staining was detected using a substrate solution comprising 3,3'-diaminobenzidine and H2O2. Counterstaining was carried out with hematoxylin at room temperature for 30 sec. Samples were imaged using an inverted fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Ti-U; magnification, x200).

Considering the percentage of positive cells and the intensity of staining, which were determined using Image J software (Java 1.8.0.172; National Institutes of Health), the IHC score was divided into values as follows: 0 (negative), indicating that the whole tissue mass was <10% stained; +1 (weakly positive), indicating that the tissue mass was 10-25% stained; +2 (moderately positive), indicating that the tissue mass exhibited 25-50% positive staining; and +3 (strongly positive), indicating that the tissue mass exhibited >75% positive staining (20). IHC score data was presented as the median + interquartile range. IHC scores of 0 or 1 were defined as low expression, and scores of 2 or 3 were defined as high expression.

Cell lines, cell culture and transfection

Human esophageal cancer cell lines (TE-1 and TE-10) were obtained from Cloud-Clone Corp. TE-1 and TE-10 culture medium consisted of DMEM (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), streptomycin sulfate (100 units/ml) and penicillin G (100 units/ml; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The cells were incubated at 37˚C in humidified conditions and 5% CO2.

For transfection, TE-1 and TE-10 cells were grown in six-well culture plates until confluence (70-80%). Transfection of siRNA1 (sense, CCGUUGUCAACGUCACCUAUA; antisense, UAUAGGUGACGUUGACAACGG) and siRNA2 (sense, CCUUGCAGGAUUUGAGCAUUU; antisense, AAAUGCUCAAAUCCUGCAAGG) (Wuhan GeneCreate Biological Engineering Co., Ltd.) was performed with Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37˚C for 4 h, with 20 nM small interfering RNA negative control (siRNA-NC, sense, UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT; antisense, ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT; Wuhan GeneCreate Biological Engineering Co., Ltd.). After transfection for 48 h, subsequent experiments were performed.

Extraction of RNA and RT-qPCR analysis

Total RNA from TE-1 and TE-10 cells, was extracted using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, respectively. Reverse Transcription kit (cat. no. 4366596; TaqMan; Jiangsu Hongyao Biological Technology Co., Ltd.) was used to synthesize complementary DNA prior to qPCR. The primer sequences are listed in Table I. qPCR was performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Perfect Real time; Takara Bio, Inc.) in accordance with the manufacturer's protocol, under the following thermocycling conditions: 60 sec of initialization at 95˚C; 30 cycles of 15 sec of denaturation at 95˚C, 30 sec of annealing at 60˚C and 1 min of elongation 72˚C; followed by 10 min of elongation at 72˚C. Each measurement was repeated three times, while calculation and standardization of the relative expression were performed using the 2-ΔΔCq method (21). GAPDH was used as an internal control.

Table I

Primer sequences of reverse transcription-quantitative PCR.

Table I

Primer sequences of reverse transcription-quantitative PCR.

GeneForward primer sequence (5'-3')Reverse primer sequence (5'-3')
GAPDH GTCTCCTCTGACTTCAACAGCG ACCACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCAA
IGF2BP2 GGCTCCCTGATCTGGTTAAGGA CCACTTCCATTCTGATGACCAGC

[i] IGF2BP2, insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 2.

Analysis of IGF2BP2 expression via western blotting (WB)

WB was used to visualize IGF2BP2 protein expression after TE-1 and TE-10 transfection with siRNA-NC and siRNA-IGF2BP2. To lyse cells, samples were treated with 1 ml RIPA buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 100 µl PMSF (10 mM) at 4˚C for 30 min. Cell lysates were then collected and centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 5 min at 4˚C to obtain total protein. The concentration of protein was subsequently detected using a BCA kit (cat. no. P0011; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) and diluted to 10 µg/l. Diluted protein (4 µl) was added with 1 µl 5X loading buffer, mixed and boiled for 4 min at 100˚C. Protein samples (50 ng) of each group, including TE-1 and TE-10 cells transfected with siRNA-NC and siRNA-IGF2BP2, were then separated using 8% SDS-PAGE. Subsequently, proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes. Ponceau S staining was applied to confirm protein transfer to PVDF membrane at room temperature, after which 10% BSA and 0.05% Tween-20 in TBS was used to block the membranes at room temperature for 1 h. Subsequently, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4˚C with the following rabbit-derived primary antibodies: Anti-IGF2BP2 (1:2,000; cat. no. ab124930; Abcam) and anti-GAPDH (1:2,500; cat. no. ab9485; Abcam). After washing the membrane with TBST three times every 5 min, the membranes were incubated with HRP-conjugated goat-derived rabbit IgG antibody (1:2,000; cat. no. ab6721; Abcam) for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, after washing the membrane with TBST three times, the membranes were visualized using an Ultra High Sensitivity ECL kit (cat. no. GK10008; Gibco) and imaged with ChemiScope 3600 mini (Clinx; magnification, x10) in a dark room. GAPDH was used as an internal control and densitometry was performed using Image J (Java 1.8.0.172).

Clonogenic assays

TE-1 and TE-10 cells were seeded at a density of 1,000 cells per well in the six-well-plate and transfected with siRNAs, then incubated for 10 days at 37˚C with 5% CO2. The cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 30 min and stained with 1% crystal violet at room temperature for 20 min. Next, colonies with a diameter >20 µm cells were recorded and imaged with a light microscope (Nikon Corporation; Ti-U; magnification, x200).

Cell cycle analysis using flow cytometry and DNA staining with PI

A total of ~1x106 TE-1 and TE-10 cells were harvested, washed with PBS and suspended in 0.5 ml PBS. Monodispersed cell suspensions were then obtained via a gentle vortex step with minimum clumping of cells. After overnight fixation of the cells in cold ethanol (70%) at 4˚C, centrifugation of the cells suspended in ethanol was performed for 5 min at 300 x g and 4˚C before careful discarding the supernatant. PBS was subsequently used to wash the samples twice before resuspension in RNase (20 µg/ml) and PI (50 µg/ml) in PBS for 30 min at room temperature, to ensure that only DNA and not RNA was stained. Subsequently, the analysis of stained cells was performed via flow cytometric analysis (BD LSRFortessa; Beckman Coulter, Inc.) and analyzed by Flow Jo V10 (FlowJo LLC).

Wound healing assay to monitor cell migration

TE-1 and TE-10 cell lines transfected with siRNA in addition to blank control groups were seeded in six-well plates at a density of 2x105 cells/well with DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. A scratch was introduced when the cell confluence reached ~80%. After washing the cells twice with PBS, samples were incubated in DMEM supplemented with 1% PS only. Wound healing assay images were recorded automatically every 4 h. An inverted fluorescence microscope (Nikon Corporation; Ti-U; magnification, x200) was used to monitor cell migration at 0, 12, 24 and 48 h after introducing the scratch. Images were analyzed using Image J (Java 1.8.0.172; National Institutes of Health).

Cell proliferation assay using cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8)

Cell proliferation was assayed after the inhibition of IGF2BP2 expression in TE-1 and TE-10 cells using a CCK-8 Cell Proliferation and Cytotoxicity Assay kit (cat. no. CA1210; Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.). A total of 5x103 cells per ml were inoculated into a 96-well plate (100 µl per well) and divided into ‘control’ and ‘IGF2BP2 siRNA’ groups. At different time points, including 0, 24 and 48 h, CCK-8 (10 ml) was added to each well carefully to avoid the introduction of bubbles, after which plates were stored in an incubator for 2 h at 37˚C. Subsequently, a microplate reader was employed to measure the absorbance value at 450 nm in triplicate.

Cell apoptosis analysis with PI/Annexin V double staining

Harvested TE-1 and TE-10 cells were washed in PBS, after which 1x106 cells were resuspended and stained using Dead Cell Apoptosis Kit with Annexin V FITC and PI (V13242, Thermo Fisher) according to the standard protocol. Cell apoptosis was analyzed through flow cytometry (BD FACSCelesta; BD Biosicences). The intensity of FITC/Annexin V fluorescence was analyzed using FlowJo V10 software (FlowJo LLC) and presented on the x-axis, while PI (screened using phycoerythrin) was plotted on the y-axis. FITC/PI denoted living cells, FITC+/PI indicated early apoptotic cells, FITC+/PI+ represented late apoptotic cells and FITC/PI+ depicted necrotic cells.

Identification of senescent cells using the senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal) assay

Senescence in siRNA transfected and blank control cell cultures was detected using the Cellular Senescence Detection kit (Beiyi Bioequip Information Co., Ltd.) in accordance with the supplier's instructions. A total of 2x104 cells per ml were seeded in six-well plates at 2 ml per well and cultured for 2 days at 37˚C. The cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature. The cells were subsequently washed with PBS twice, after which 1 ml SA-β-gal staining solution was added prior to incubation at 37˚C for 15 min. After blue coloring was fully developed, cells were washed twice with PBS. A single drop of mounting medium was added before cover glasses were placed atop the six-well plate. SA-β-gal-blue positive cells were counted using an inverted fluorescence microscope (Nikon Corporation; Ti-U; magnification, x200).

Detection of DNA synthesis in proliferating cells using a 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) assay

Analysis of proliferating TE-1 and TE-10 cells after treatment with siRNA-IGF2BP2 or siRNA-NC was carried out using the BeyoClick EdU cell proliferation kit with Alexa Fluro 488 (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) based on the manufacturer's protocol. Subsequently, EdU (10 mM) was added to cells after transfection, after which samples were incubated at 37˚C for 2 h. Cells were then fixed for 30 min at room temperature with standard formaldehyde (4%) and permeabilized with Triton X-100 (0.5%) prior to staining at room temperature for 0.5 h with a Ultra High Sensitivity ECL kit. DAPI (5 mg/ml) was applied for 15 min to stain cell nuclei at room temperature before observation using a fluorescent microscope (Nikon Corporation; Ti-U; magnification, x200).

Statistical analysis

All data are presented as the mean ± SD, and at least three independent experiments were performed. The construction of graphs and the statistical analysis of data was performed using χ2 test and one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test, with GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Inc.) and SPSS 17.0 (SPSS, Inc.) software, respectively. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

IGF2BP2 is upregulated in human ESCC tissue samples compared with adjacent ESCC tissue samples

IHC staining was performed to determine IGF2BP2 expression levels in 94 specimens of human ESCC tissues, which are listed in Table I. Due to the limitation of patient tumor size, 36 ESCC tissues were screened from the 94 specimens, with 15 adjacent healthy tissues obtained from the 36 specimens. IGF2BP2 was notably distributed in the nucleus and cytoplasm of squamous epithelial cells, as well as smooth muscle and stromal cells. The respective IHC images and scores of IGF2BP2 expression on normal, adjacent ESCC and ESCC tissues are presented in Fig. 1. A substantially higher IGF2BP2 expression was observed in ESCC and adjacent ESCC samples compared with normal healthy tissues. The results also revealed that ~78% of ESCC samples exhibited a strongly positive IGF2BP2 expression, while 15% demonstrated a moderate expression and 7% exhibited a weak expression. Altogether, the increased expression of IGF2BP2 may serve as a marker of human ESCC.

Clinical relevance of IGF2BP2 expression in ESCC tissues

The association between IGF2BP2 and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with ESCC was assessed. χ2 test analysis revealed a significant association between IGF2BP2 expression, tumor differentiation (P=0.038), TNM stages (P=0.018), lymph node metastasis (P<0.001) and lymphatic infiltration (P<0.001). Non-significant differences were observed in sex (P=0.379) and age (P=0.775; Table II). In patients with ESCC, IGF2BP2 expression in III-IV grade tumors was markedly upregulated compared with grades I-II, as presented in Table II. Overall, IGF2BP2 expression was established to be associated with the progression of ESCC.

Table II

Association between insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 2 protein expression and clinicopathological features of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Table II

Association between insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 2 protein expression and clinicopathological features of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

 Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 2 protein expression 
VariableNumber of casesMedian (P25, P75)Low (score; 0 or 1), nHigh (score; 2 or 3), nP-value
Sex    0.379
     Male, n663 (1, 3)2046 
     Female, n283 (2, 3)622 
Age    0.775
     <64523 (1, 3)1537 
     ≥64423 (1, 3)1131 
Degree of tumor differentiation    0.038
     High201.5 (1, 3)1010 
     Middle473 (2, 3)1136 
     Low273 (2, 3)522 
Tumor, node and metastasis staging    0.018
     I-II622 (1, 3)2240 
     III-IV323 (2, 3)428 
Lymph node metastasis    <0.001
     Positive383 (3, 3)335 
     Negative562 (1, 3)2333 
Lymphatic infiltration    <0.001
     Positive433 (2, 3)439 
     Negative512 (1, 3)2229 
IGF2BP2 expression in ESCC cell lines

IGF2BP2 mRNA levels in TE-1 and TE-10 cell lines were quantified by performing RT-qPCR. As presented in Fig. 2A, the mRNA expression level of IGF2BP2 significantly increased in TE-1 cells compared with TE-10 cells. Subsequently, siRNAs targeting IGF2BP2 were transfected to knock down its expression in TE-1 and TE-10 cells (Fig. 2B and C), while siRNA-NC was used as negative control. The results of WB indicated that IGF2BP2 expression levels were significantly inhibited after siRNA transfection in both TE-1 and TE-10 cells.

IGF2BP2 knockdown inhibits the proliferation and migration of ESCC cells

To study the effect of IGF2BP2 in ESCC cell proliferation, a CCK-8 assay was performed to investigate the viability of siRNA-transfected TE-1 and TE-10 cells. As indicated in Fig. 3, the number of living cells was markedly decreased in the two siRNA-IGF2BP2 groups compared with the siRNA-NC group. In addition, the results of the SA-β-gal positive clone assay revealed that IGF2BP2 was significantly less capable of generating clones after siRNA1 and siRNA2 transfection in TE-1 and TE-10 cells compared with the control group (Fig. 4). Furthermore, the effect of the siRNA2 treated group was significantly decreased compared with the siRNA1 group. The results of the EdU assay demonstrated similar results to the clonal assay. The colorimetric detection of SA-β-gal and EdU assays revealed that ESCC cellular senescence and DNA synthesis replication, involved in the process of proliferation, were positively associated with IGF2BP2 expression (Fig. 5).

Since IGF2BP2 was highly expressed in lymphatic infiltration metastasis of ESCC tissues (22), the role of IGF2BP2 in ESCC cell migratory activity was studied in vitro using a wound healing assay. The results revealed an increased wound width after scratch introduction in the two siRNA-IGF2BP2 groups compared with the siRNA-NC group. These results implied that ESCC cell migration was suppressed by IGF2BP2 knockdown (Fig. 6). The present findings indicated that IGF2BP2 could play a crucial role in the inhibition of ESCC cell proliferation and migration.

IGF2BP2 knockdown induces cell cycle arrest and ESCC cell apoptosis

Flow cytometry assays were performed to determine whether IGF2BP2 could regulate cell cycle progression in TE-1 and TE-10 cells after transfection with two siRNA-IGF2BP2s or siRNA-NC. The percentage of cells at distinct phases is indicated in Fig. 7, with results demonstrating that IGF2BP2 knockdown induced significant cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase compared with siRNA-NC-treated cells. The present results suggested that IGF2BP2 participates in the regulation of the G1/S transition during ESCC cell cycle progression. Furthermore, the role of IGF2BP2 in apoptosis was investigated by performing flow cytometry with PI/Annexin V double staining. The apoptosis rate of IGF2BP2-siRNA-treated cells was significantly increased compared with siRNA-NC-treated cells (Fig. 8). Early apoptotic cell percentages were similar between siRNA-IGF2BP2-treated and siRNA-NC-treated cells (Q3), whereas late apoptotic cells were markedly increased in siRNA-IGF2BP2-treated cell lines after 48 h of transfection (Q4). Altogether, the present findings indicated that the inhibition of IGF2BP2 significantly reduced tumor cell proliferation and migration, and increased the senescence of tumor cells, suggesting that IGF2BP2 may be a key regulatory oncogene for tumorigenesis in ESCC cells.

Discussion

ESCC is a commonly diagnosed cancer of the digestive system, and concerns have been growing worldwide owing to its high incidence and mortality rate, in developing nations such as China or India (23). Despite the approval of several treatment options, the prognosis of patients in advanced stages, along with their overall survival rate remains low (24). The efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of ESCC, including docetaxel or paclitaxel, which have limited treatment potential and produce adverse effects in clinical settings (5). Therefore, it is important to find new therapeutic targets for ESCC therapy.

As an RNA-binding protein, IGF2BP2 has been revealed to post-transcriptionally drive the progression of cancer cells through its ability to regulate the trafficking, localization, stabilization and translation of mRNAs involved in important aspects of cellular functions (25). Various studies have reported its contribution in several physiological processes, such as embryo development, neuron metabolism, neuron differentiation and IFG2BP2 aberrant regulation, which causes insulin resistance, obesity, diabetes and carcinogenesis (26-28). IGF2BP2 is highly expressed in several types of cancer, including brain cancer (29), liver carcinoma (30), ovarian cancer (31), endometrial adenocarcinoma (32) and breast cancer (33). A previous study documented its tumorigenic role in promoting tumor growth, cell proliferation, migration and invasion (34). However, the function and expression profile of IFG2BP2 during ESCC development has not yet been elucidated. The present study reported that IGF2BP2 was upregulated in ESCC and its adjacent cancerous tissues, compared with normal adjacent tissues. IGF2BP2 expression was associated with increased clinical tumor stages, lymphatic infiltration and LNM. The present study also revealed that IGF2BP2 played regulatory roles in ESCC cell survival, proliferation and migration.

Autoantibodies against tumor-associated antigen (IGF2BP2/p62) have been revealed to increase as ESCC progresses (35). A previous study determined that IGF2BP2 expression was elevated in patients with EAC and precancerous Barret's esophagus lesion, with higher expression levels being associated with metastasis and the poor survival of patients (15). In the present study, IGF2BP2 expression was analyzed using RT-qPCR and IHC in ESCC, adjacent ESCC and normal tissues obtained from the same patient. Consistent with previous studies (36), the present findings indicated that IGF2BP2 expression was highly increased in a large proportion of patients with ESCC and substantially associated with the degree of tumor differentiation, TNM staging, LNM and lymphatic infiltration. Therefore, IGF2BP2 could act as an unfavorable biomarker for the development and prognosis of ESCC. Further studies are required to understand the association between IGF2BP2 expression and the survival rates of patients with ESCC.

A previous study demonstrated that miR-141 silencing induced the upregulation of IGF2BP2, which promoted pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and survival through the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway (37). In addition, newly discovered Cys-His protein 2 and muscle RING-finger 3 mRNAs have been determined to be post-transcriptionally regulated and involved in the regulatory mechanism of cytoskeleton remodeling and membrane integrity maintenance via IGF2BP2, and IFG2BP2 inhibition results in the reduction of cell motility and invasive capacity in rhabdomyosarcoma (38). Moreover, the dysregulation of IGF2BP2 and METTL3 was indicated to trigger colorectal cancer progression and metastasis (39). Changes in biological phenotypes in the progression of ESCC were then examined using ESCC cell lines (TE-1 and TE-10) transfected with IGF2BP2-siRNA in vitro, compared with siRNA-NC-treated cells. The present in vitro results were consistent with the clinical findings of IGF2BP2 in human ESCC tissues, indicating that the downregulation of IGF2BP2 negatively affected ESCC cell proliferation and migration by inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Therefore, IGF2BP2 may serve as a tumor promoter in ESCC.

The present work aimed to determine the expression profile of IGF2BP2 in ESCC and its association with the clinicopathological features of patients with ESCC. RT-qPCR analysis revealed that IGF2BP2 expression levels were elevated in ESCC tissues, while loss of function demonstrated that IGF2BP2 downregulation promoted ESCC cell apoptosis and suppressed cell proliferation and migration. The results of the present study may provide a valuable insight into the expression of IGF2BP2 in ESCC cell progression and may help to develop novel therapeutic approaches for ESCC diagnosis and therapy.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: The present work was supported by the Development Plant Projects of the Science and Technology at Suzhou (grant no. SYS2019008) and Changshu (grant no. CS201915).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

FL conceived the manuscript. FL, WC and TJ conceptualized and designed the experiments. BW, ZL, GH and JQ performed the experiments. JQ, WW, MY and XH analyzed the data. FL, WC, TJ and BW contributed reagents, materials and analysis tools. FL, TJ, CC and BW drafted the manuscript. CC collected and verified patient raw data. WC and TJ confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Review and approval for the current study was obtained by the Ethical committee of Changshu Second People's Hospital at Jiangsu Province. Patients provided their written informed consent to participate in the present study.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Quaas A, Rehkaemper J, Rueschoff J, Pamuk A, Zander T, Hillmer A, Siemanowski J, Wittig J, Buettner R, Plum P, et al: Occurrence of high microsatellite-instability/mismatch repair deficiency in nearly 2,000 human adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, and bile ducts: A study from a large german comprehensive cancer center. Front Oncol. 11(569475)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Zhu J, Ma S, Xie S, Liu Z, Li Z and Wei W: Biological correlates before esophageal cancer screening and after diagnosis. Sci Rep. 11(17015)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A and Bray F: Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 71:209–249. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Napier KJ, Scheerer M and Misra S: Esophageal cancer: A review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, staging workup and treatment modalities. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 6:112–120. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Nakajima M and Kato H: Treatment options for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 14:1345–1354. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Tustumi F, Kimura MS, Takeda FR, Uema RH, Salum RAA, Ribeiro-Junior U and Cecconello I: Prognostic factors and survival analysis in esophageal carcinoma. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 29:138–141. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In English, Portuguese).

7 

Dai N, Ji F, Wright J, Minichiello L, Sadreyev R and Avruch J: IGF2 mRNA binding protein-2 is a tumor promoter that drives cancer proliferation through its client mRNAs IGF2 and HMGA1. Elife. 6(e27155)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Ye S, Song W, Xu X, Zhao X and Yang L: IGF2BP2 promotes colorectal cancer cell proliferation and survival through interfering with RAF-1 degradation by miR-195. FEBS Lett. 590:1641–1650. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Pu J, Wang J, Qin Z, Wang A, Zhang Y, Wu X, Wu Y, Li W, Xu Z, Lu Y, et al: IGF2BP2 promotes liver cancer growth through an m6A-FEN1-dependent mechanism. Front Oncol. 10(578816)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Dahlem C, Barghash A, Puchas P, Haybaeck J and Kessler SM: The insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein IMP2/IGF2BP2 is overexpressed and correlates with poor survival in pancreatic cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 20(3204)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Janiszewska M, Suvà ML, Riggi N, Houtkooper RH, Auwerx J, Clément-Schatlo V, Radovanovic I, Rheinbay E, Provero P and Stamenkovic I: Imp2 controls oxidative phosphorylation and is crucial for preserving glioblastoma cancer stem cells. Genes Dev. 26:1926–1944. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Simon Y, Kessler SM, Bohle RM, Haybaeck J and Kiemer AK: The insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) mRNA-binding protein p62/IGF2BP2-2 as a promoter of NAFLD and HCC? Gut. 63:861–863. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

He X, Li W, Liang X, Zhu X, Zhang L, Huang Y, Yu T, Li S and Chen Z: IGF2BP2 overexpression indicates poor survival in patients with acute myelocytic leukemia. Cell Physiol Biochem. 51:1945–1956. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Cleynen I, Brants JR, Peeters K, Deckers R, Debiec-Rychter M, Sciot R, Van de Ven WJ and Petit MM: HMGA2 regulates transcription of the Imp2 gene via an intronic regulatory element in cooperation with nuclear factor-kappaB. Mol Cancer Res. 5:363–372. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Barghash A, Golob-Schwarzl N, Helms V, Haybaeck J and Kessler SM: Elevated expression of the IGF2 mRNA binding protein 2 (IGF2BP2/IMP2) is linked to short survival and metastasis in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget. 7:49743–49750. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Li T, Hu PS, Lin JF, Ju HQ and Xu RH: IDDF2019-ABS-0290 IGF2BP2 facilitates tumor progression via an m6A-dependent mechanism in colorectal carcinoma. Gut. 68 (Suppl 1):A1–A166. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Albores-Saavedra J, Adsay NV and Crawford JM: ‘Tumours of the gallbladder and extrahepatic bile ducts’, in WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH and Theise ND (eds). Lyon, France, IARC Press, pp263-276, 2010.

18 

Sobin LH and Compton CC: TNM seventh edition: What's new, what's changed: Communication from the international union against cancer and the American joint committee on cancer. Cancer. 116:5336–5339. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Puschhof J, Post Y, Beumer J, Kerkkamp HM, Bittenbinder M, Vonk FJ, Casewell NR, Richardson MK and Clevers H: Derivation of snake venom gland organoids for in vitro venom production. Nat Protoc. 16:1494–1510. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Detre S, Saclani Jotti G and Dowsett M: A ‘quickscore’ method for immunohistochemical semiquantitation: Validation for oestrogen receptor in breast carcinomas. J Clin Pathol. 48:876–878. 1995.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(T)(-Delta Delta C) method. Methods. 25:402–408. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Yang H, Xu L, Qian H, Niu X, Zhao D, Zhao Z, Wu J, Liu L and Wang Y: Correlation between insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 and metastasis-associated gene 1 protein in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Med Rep. 13:4143–4150. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Alsop BR and Sharma P: Esophageal cancer. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 45:399–412. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Short MW, Burgers KG and Fry VT: Esophageal cancer. Am Fam Physician. 95:22–28. 2017.PubMed/NCBI

25 

Bell JL, Wächter K, Mühleck B, Pazaitis N, Köhn M, Lederer M and Hüttelmaier S: Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding proteins (IGF2BPs): Post-transcriptional drivers of cancer progression? Cell Mol Life Sci. 70:2657–2675. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Gu T, Horová E, Möllsten A, Seman NA, Falhammar H, Prázný M, Brismar K and Gu HF: IGF2BP2 and IGF2 genetic effects in diabetes and diabetic nephropathy. J Diabetes Complications. 26:393–398. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Dai N, Zhao L, Wrighting D, Krämer D, Majithia A, Wang Y, Cracan V, Borges-Rivera D, Mootha VK, Nahrendorf M, et al: IGF2BP2/IMP2-deficient mice resist obesity through enhanced translation of Ucp1 mRNA and other mRNAs encoding mitochondrial proteins. Cell Metab. 21:609–621. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Hou P, Meng S, Li M, Lin T, Chu S, Li Z, Zheng J, Gu Y and Bai J: LINC00460/DHX9/IGF2BP2 complex promotes colorectal cancer proliferation and metastasis by mediating HMGA1 mRNA stability depending on m6A modification. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 40(52)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Mu Q, Wang L, Yu F, Gao H, Lei T, Li P, Liu P, Zheng X, Hu X, Chen Y, et al: Imp2 regulates GBM progression by activating IGF2/PI3K/Akt pathway. Cancer Biol Ther. 16:623–633. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Lu M, Nakamura RM, Dent ED, Zhang JY, Nielsen FC, Christiansen J, Chan EK and Tan EM: Aberrant expression of fetal RNA-binding protein p62 in liver cancer and liver cirrhosis. Am J Pathol. 159:945–953. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Liu X, Ye H, Li L, Li W, Zhang Y and Zhang JY: Humoral autoimmune responses to insulin-like growth factor II mRNA-binding proteins IMP1 and p62/IMP2 in ovarian cancer. J Immunol Res. 2014(326593)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

32 

Zhang L, Liu Y, Hao S, Woda BA and Lu D: IMP2 expression distinguishes endometrioid from serous endometrial adenocarcinomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 35:868–872. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

33 

McMullen ER, Gonzalez ME, Skala SL, Tran M, Thomas D, Djomehri SI, Burman B, Kidwell KM and Kleer CG: CCN6 regulates IGF2BP2 and HMGA2 signaling in metaplastic carcinomas of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 172:577–586. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Cao J, Mu Q and Huang H: The roles of insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 2 in cancer and cancer stem cells. Stem Cells Int. 2018(4217259)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Wu X, Fan Y, Liu Y, Shen B, Lu H and Ma H: Long non-coding RNA CCAT2 promotes the development of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by inhibiting miR-200b to upregulate the IGF2BP2/TK1 axis. Front Oncol. 11(680642)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Zhou SL, Yue WB, Fan ZM, Du F, Liu BC, Li B, Han XN, Ku JW, Zhao XK, Zhang P, et al: Autoantibody detection to tumor-associated antigens of P53, IMP1, P16, cyclin B1, P62, C-myc, Survivn, and Koc for the screening of high-risk subjects and early detection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dis Esophagus. 27:790–797. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Xu X, Yu Y, Zong K, Lv P and Gu Y: Up-regulation of IGF2BP2 by multiple mechanisms in pancreatic cancer promotes cancer proliferation by activating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 38(497)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

38 

Boudoukha S, Cuvellier S and Polesskaya A: Role of the RNA-binding protein IMP-2 in muscle cell motility. Mol Cell Biol. 30:5710–5725. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Li T, Hu PS, Zuo Z, Lin JF, Li X, Wu QN, Chen ZH, Zeng ZL, Wang F, Zheng J, et al: METTL3 facilitates tumor progression via an m6A-IGF2BP2-dependent mechanism in colorectal carcinoma. Mol Cancer. 18(112)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

April-2022
Volume 23 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Lu F, Chen W, Jiang T, Cheng C, Wang B, Lu Z, Huang G, Qiu J, Wei W, Yang M, Yang M, et al: Expression profile, clinical significance and biological functions of IGF2BP2 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Exp Ther Med 23: 252, 2022.
APA
Lu, F., Chen, W., Jiang, T., Cheng, C., Wang, B., Lu, Z. ... Huang, X. (2022). Expression profile, clinical significance and biological functions of IGF2BP2 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 23, 252. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2022.11177
MLA
Lu, F., Chen, W., Jiang, T., Cheng, C., Wang, B., Lu, Z., Huang, G., Qiu, J., Wei, W., Yang, M., Huang, X."Expression profile, clinical significance and biological functions of IGF2BP2 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 23.4 (2022): 252.
Chicago
Lu, F., Chen, W., Jiang, T., Cheng, C., Wang, B., Lu, Z., Huang, G., Qiu, J., Wei, W., Yang, M., Huang, X."Expression profile, clinical significance and biological functions of IGF2BP2 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 23, no. 4 (2022): 252. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2022.11177