Pathophysiology of cognitive dysfunction and the role of combined brain/heart magnetic resonance imaging (Review)

  • Authors:
    • George Markousis‑Mavrogenis
    • Flora Bacopoulou
    • Genovefa Kolovou
    • Maria-Roser Pons
    • Aikaterini Giannakopoulou
    • Antigoni Papavasiliou
    • George D. Kitas
    • George P. Chrousos
    • Sophie I. Mavrogeni
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: July 14, 2022     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2022.11506
  • Article Number: 569
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Normal cognitive function depends on a continuous and optimally regulated blood supply, and any pathology that further reduces cerebral blood perfusion in addition to that caused by aging could damage or destroy vulnerable neurons of the brain. Furthermore, glucose serves a crucial role as the primary fuel source for the mammalian brain and any disturbance in its circulating concentrations could directly affect brain function. The term cognitive dysfunction (CD), known also as ‘brain fog’, refers to deficits in attention, verbal and non‑verbal learning, short‑term and working memory, visual and auditory processing, mathematic problem solving, processing speed, focusing on a specific topic, and motor functioning. CD is the end‑point of various cardiovascular, neural, metabolic and immune function impairments. Although CD has a serious impact on patient survival and quality of life, usually it is clinically underestimated. CD is currently assessed using cognitive tests (questionnaires), which have important limitations in their diagnostic capacity, specifically in the preclinical forms of CD. Cognitive tests may not identify subclinical cases of CD but diagnose CD only when symptoms are clinically overt. Furthermore, these tests do not provide information regarding the underlying pathophysiologic background of CD. The aim of the present review is to summarize the existing literature on CD and emphasize the role of combined brain‑heart magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in its early diagnosis, before CD questionnaires are abnormal. Combined brain/heart MRI has the potential to identify patients with CD at an early stage, facilitating risk stratification and early intervention. Furthermore, in parallel with brain assessment, it provides valuable information regarding the effect of the underlying disease on the myocardium. Equipment availability, physician familiarity and cost/effectiveness should be considered before wide clinical application of combined brain/heart MRI is recommended.

1. Introduction

Cognition includes intellectual abilities used for perceiving, acquiring, understanding and responding to information presented to a person. The term cognitive dysfunction (CD), known also as ‘brain fog’, refers to deficits in attention, verbal and non-verbal learning, short-term and working memory, visual and auditory processing, mathematic problem solving, processing speed, focusing on a specific topic, and motor functioning (1-3).

It has been documented that normal aging is associated with reduction of cerebral blood flow by approximately 20% at age 60, compared to the age of 20 years (4). Normal cognitive function (CF) depends on a continuous and optimally regulated blood supply (5), and any pathology that further reduces cerebral blood perfusion in addition to that caused by aging could damage or destroy vulnerable neurons of the brain (5). Glucose plays a crucial role as the primary fuel source for the mammalian brain and any disturbance in its circulating concentrations could directly affect brain function (6).

Our aim is to review the existing literature about the assessment of CD and the role(s) of various diseases in the development of this disorder. We will emphasize the added value of a combined brain-heart magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation in the early diagnosis of CD.

2. Indications for CD screening

People should be screened for CD in the following cases: i) if the person himself or herself, family members, or others express concerns about changes in his/her memory or thinking, ii) if problems/changes in the patient's memory or thinking are observed by the physician, iii) if the patient is age 80 or older, because the risk of dementia increases rapidly after this age (7). Other risk factors that could further support the need for dementia screening include: a) low education, b) history of type 2 diabetes mellitus, c) stroke, d) depression, and e) difficulties in managing money or medications (7).

Several standardized measures of CF have been used and include the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (8), the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) (9) and the Mini-Cog (10). All three tests measure mental functions through a series of questions and/or performance of simple tasks. Although cognitive testing cannot show the specific cause of impairment, it can assess whether the patient needs further evaluation (8). The main limitation in the evaluation of CF is the lack of robust evidence to support all available screening tests (11). In addition, they have a relatively high rate of intra-subject variability, which reduces their ability to identify mild deficits or preclinical disease (12). There is no ideal test for any type of CD, and this has resulted in the development of many specialized tests for various types of the disorder (12). Finally, CF testing is unable to provide specific information about the neural structures responsible for any dysfunction identified. For example, although it appears that white matter functions, such as processing speed, attention, and visual-spatial processing, are particularly affected by diabetes mellitus, localization of this dysfunction to white or gray matter is not possible using the standard tests that assess neurocognition (12).

3. Diseases implicated in the development of cognitive dysfunction

Various diseases have been implicated in the development of CD. The main groups responsible for CD development encompass the following entities:

Cardiovascular diseases

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are classified as cardiomyopathies, coronary artery, valvular, and congenital heart diseases. All these entities may finally lead to rhythm disturbances and heart failure (HF) (13). Any type of structural or functional CVD decreasing cerebral blood flow will also increase the risk for Alzheimer disease (AD) (14). The association between CVD and CD, known as cardiogenic dementia, was initially described in patients with cardiac arrhythmias (14). Atrioventricular block and arrhythmias lower cardiac output and lead to persistent CD and dementia (14,15). However, CD could be attenuated or even reversed after cardiac pacing (14,15), due to improvement of cerebral perfusion (14).

Brain hypoperfusion, as a result of low cardiac output or hypotension may lead to CD (16) and finally to AD (17-19). There is also an association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and CD leading to AD in the absence of stroke, hypertension and diabetes, because AF induces significant brain hypoperfusion (20,21). Furthermore, HF, thrombotic events, coronary artery disease, valvular disease and AF that are more common in the elderly, can contribute to CD affecting mainly the performance in executive functions, attention, learning, psychomotor speed, verbal fluency, mental alertness and memory (22,23). Additionally, a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction is associated with impairment of continuous vigilance and discriminability (24). Furthermore, low cardiac output is associated with impairment of executive function, including sequencing and planning (25). In these cases, cardiac resynchronization may reverse CD by improving cardiac hemodynamics and consequently brain perfusion (26,27).

Neural diseases

CD is a common expression of various neural disorders including:

Dementia

Several types of dementia have been described: AD, vascular dementia (VaD), dementia with Lewy bodies, frontotemporal dementia and dementia associated with Parkinson´s disease. Dementia may also be secondary to the human immuno-deficiency virus (HIV-associated dementia) or other infectious agents and this may be of particular importance in younger adults in specific areas. Other rarer causes of dementia include Huntington's disease, prion disease and head trauma (28).

AD is the most frequent subtype, corresponding to about 55% of all diagnoses in humans aged >65 years (28). Next in frequency is VaD, a common condition, especially in older patients (29,30), estimated to represent 15% of all cases (28). Although AD can be identified with a satisfactory degree of accuracy, at present, there is no consensus on how to define ‘mixed’ dementia in clinical practice. Moreover, overlapping symptoms and co-morbidities make the distinction more difficult and a differential diagnosis is further complicated by the fact that many patients have concomitant AD and cerebrovascular disease (31).

Multiple sclerosis

CD occurs in 40-65% of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. It involves complex attention, information processing speed, episodic memory and executive functions. It can be found in both subclinical and clinically overt MS. In pediatric-onset MS, cognition worsens relatively rapidly. CD usually affects personal life and vocational status. In relapsing-remitting MS timely and adequate disease-modifying treatment may stabilize or improve CD. Cognitive behavioral therapy, including exercise and education programs, is a promising intervention to improve CD (32).

Neuromuscular disorders

Neuromuscular disorders mainly affect the motor functioning of the patient. However, the cognitive effects of these diseases are also important. This is due to molecular defects that significantly affect neuromotor functioning, but also participate in the functioning of neural networks involved in cognitive processes, leading to impairment of executive, behavioral and psychosocial functions (33).

Although most Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) patients are not intellectually disabled, the risk for CD is increased, with up to 30% of DMD patients presenting intellectual disability. Apart from intellectual abilities, neurocognitive dysfunction has been frequently reported. Deficits in short-term memory, executive functions, visuospatial ability, as well as deficits in attention, problems with narrative, linguistic and reading skills have been described, irrespective of general intelligence. Moreover, a higher incidence of neuro-psychiatric disorders, such as autism, attention deficit, hyperactivity, obsessive-compulsive disorders and social behavior problems, has also been reported (34).

Psychiatric disorders Schizophrenia

There is a broad range of CD in schizophrenia and includes problems in perception, attention, memory and problem-solving (35). Various studies suggest that the working memory system is of limited capacity in schizophrenia (36-39). Working memory deficits are significantly correlated with formal thought disorders (40), and deficits in long-term memory (41). Schizophrenic patients may also show deficits in executive function (42,43), linked to disease severity and poor medication compliance (44,45).

Mood disorders

Neurocognitive deficits are common in mood disorders. In major depression, they can mimic severe dementia (46). In the acute phase of bipolar disorder, they may progress to stupor. Cognitive deficits in mood disorders include impaired performance in tests of attention, executive function and memory. The deficits are correlated with both the number of affective episodes and the overall disease duration (47). Performance on memory and executive tasks has been correlated with illness episodes.

Obsessive-compulsive disorder

Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) may show impairment on numerous tests of non-verbal memory including visual reproduction and delayed recognition of figures, maze learning and intermediate/delayed figure copying. Most studies suggest that encoding and retrieval are impaired in OCD, while storage of information remains intact. Patients with OCD often function remarkably well in their daily lives, despite severe symptomatology and cognitive difficulties, which are apparent only on specific testing. In contrast to non-verbal memory deficits, verbal memory is generally preserved in OCD (48,49). Patients with OCD demonstrate normal general intelligence and language abilities.

Somatic symptoms disorders

Somatic symptoms disorders include somatic, psychopathological and neuropsychological symptoms. Cognitive complaints include poor concentration, decreased memory of recent events and poor word-finding abilities (50). Approximately 50-85% of patients with somatoform/chronic fatigue syndrome report CD, which contributes significantly to their social and occupational dysfunction (51,52).

Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Poor performance on tests of executive function, sustained attention and memory, are the most common neuropsychological deficits reported in children and adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). There is little evidence for deficits in basic motor, visual, spatial or sensory functioning in ADHD, with the possible exception of olfactory function (53,54).

Substance abuse

CD has been identified following substance abuse and affects mental activities that involve acquiring, storing, retrieving, and using information. This dysfunction plays an important role in the development of the addictive process and rehabilitation of substance abusers (55-58).

Metabolic diseases

The mechanism of CD in diabetes mellitus (DM) is complex and includes a) factors related to DM per se (direct effect of altered glucose metabolism on the brain) and b) DM-related CVD and microvascular dysfunction. Chronic hyperglycemia triggers neuronal damage and endothelial dysfunction, leading to CD over time (59-62). In the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) cognitive follow-up study, 1,144 participants were followed up for 18 years. High long-term hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, advanced age, lower level of education and two clinical microvascular complications, such as proliferative diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy, were associated with CD (63,64).

DM is also a major risk factor for stroke, particularly ischemic stroke, with type 2 DM alone known to increase stroke risk 1.5 to 4-fold (63). Furthermore, chronic hyperglycemia dramatically increases the risk of diabetic microvascular disease including retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy. A positive correlation between nephropathy and/or retinopathy and CD has been found (64,65). Microvascular disease may also directly lead to CD (66).

The effect of DM on cerebrovascular impairment can be explained by the increased burden of inflammatory cytokines e.g., interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and subsequent chronic inflammation, which contributes to CD (67). Finally, the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ‘4 allele’, a documented risk factor for CVD and AD in the general population, is also implicated in the development of CD in DM. Additionally, studies involving mainly patients with type 2 DM, have revealed APOE ‘4-negative’ diabetic participants to be more likely to develop AD, compared with APOE ‘4-positive’ diabetic patients (68,69).

In contrast to hyperglycemia, the role of hypoglycemia is controversial but the relationship between hypoglycemia and CD may become clear in elderly patients. Although severe hypoglycemia has not been associated with long-term CD in young patients with type 1 DM (DCCT follow-up study) (68), recent studies in adults >60 years with type 1 DM showed a greater prevalence of CD (60).

Autoimmune rheumatic diseases

For people with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) including sarcoidosis, avoiding CD is crucial to successfully perform everyday tasks, including medical treatment adherence or planning activities. Most ARDs have been associated with various degrees of CD, which has been mainly documented in rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, and sarcoidosis.

Combined brain/heart MRI images of a case patient with sarcoidosis and doubtful CD tests, are shown in Figs. 1 and 2.

Rheumatoid arthritis

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) present an increased risk of stroke, as a consequence of accelerated atherosclerosis (70). Among psychiatric manifestations, depression and anxiety have been found in 2/3 of RA patients and have been associated with disease activity (70). RA patients usually underperform on CD tests, compared to controls (71). Even mild CD may influence the functional capacity and quality of life of these patients by affecting reactivity to pain and compliance to treatment (71,72). CD may occur even in the early stages of the disease (73).

Inflammation affecting the brain (72) and accelerated atherosclerosis, as a result of systemic inflammation (74) are the main causes of CD in RA. Furthermore, RA disease activity is an important stimulus of CD, depression and anxiety (72). Finally, pain, stress, fatigue and sleep disturbances, may be also involved in the development of RA-associated CD. Anti-rheumatic drugs, such as methotrexate (MTX) and corticosteroids are also related with CD. Both MTX and corticosteroids suppress systemic inflammation and may have beneficial effects on CD. However, MTX has been associated with CD, mood disturbances and confusion, while corticosteroids may influence memory and hippocampal function (75).

Systemic lupus erythematosus

A wide range of syndromes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) including stroke, acute confusional state, headaches and mood disorders may lead to CD (76), which affects 3-81% of SLE patients. This is due to the absence of standardized diagnostic criteria and screening tools. Additionally, the neuropsychiatric manifestations often develop insidiously, can present independently of other SLE signs of disease activity and often do not respond to standard immunosuppression. Therefore, CD in SLE patients often remains underdiagnosed and undertreated in clinical practice (77).

The treatment with neurotoxic/psychoactive medications such as corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide, and the neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE (NPSLE) such as strokes, seizures, depression or anxiety, can all independently contribute to CD. However, there is an early presentation of NPSLE, with 40% of SLE patients diagnosed with neuropsychiatric symptoms at the time of diagnosis or within the first 3 years post diagnosis (78,79).

Antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies, often coexisting with SLE, are a strong risk factor for NPSLE, due to a stroke, structural damage and associated CD, as a consequence of hypercoagulation (80,81). However, aPL antibodies have also been correlated to NPSLE syndromes that are not directly related to thrombotic or ischaemic events (82). Neurotoxic auto-antibodies, pro-inflammatory cytokines and cell-mediated agents together with abnormalities in neuroimmune structures including the choroid plexus and blood-brain barrier, allow systemic autoimmune factors to penetrate into the central nervous system in NPSLE (80,83). Finally, increased levels of IL-6 and neurotoxic anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antibodies have been found in SLE with CD (84-86).

Systemic sclerosis

Although anxiety, depression and mood changes are common, in contrast to other ARDs, CD is rare in systemic sclerosis (SSc) (87). However, under special circumstances vascular damage can be of great importance, as in a renal crisis. This is a due to thrombotic microangiopathy with concurrent hypertension that occurs almost exclusively in early-stage diffuse SSc and is strongly associated with the anti-RNA polymerase autoantibodies. The systemic micro-vasculopathy of SSc renal crisis may lead to generalized seizures and potentially significant CD (88). This disorder generally recovers after several weeks without other consequences. Furthermore, one in five patients with SSc will also develop another ARD, such as SLE or Sjögren's syndrome (89) and the CD of these diseases will be an additional factor for CD development in SSc patients. Immune-mediated encephalitis may occasionally occur in some SSc patients (90). SSc is associated with Raynaud's phenomenon and there are several reports of CD after cold exposure (91), due to changes in cerebral perfusion (91). Finally, in localized scleroderma, especially linear morphoea, structural abnormalities affecting the cranium or brain can be associated with epilepsy and possibly CD in some patients.

ANCA-associated vasculitis

According to a recent study, the prevalence of CD in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) was similar to RA and those with CD had high disease activity. Abnormal performance was more frequent in the executive functions, followed by language. Furthermore, psychomotor functions were more frequently affected in AAV patients (92).

4. Currently used approach for CD diagnosis

The currently used diagnostic approach for CD diagnosis includes a) assessment of problems with memory or another mental function; b) mental decline over time; c) if overall mental function and daily activities are affected; and d) mental status testing. A neural clinical and laboratory examination is necessary. Finally, cognitive testing and brain CT/MRI provide an integrated image of mental status.

The great diversity of causes and outcomes of CD has motivated a wide search for effective therapies. These include specific neurological medications, interventions to achieve better brain perfusion, occupational therapy and environmental approaches.

Future research includes the development of neuroimaging and genetic testing that help the identification of individuals at increased risk for CD.

5. Pro and contra of cognitive tests

MoCA is a quick test, taking only 10 to 15 min to be completed. Various studies have shown that MoCA correctly identifies dementia in approximately 94% of cases. Furthermore, while people in the early or mild stages of dementia might score high enough on other tests (including the MMSE), and the score would indicate that no dementia is present, MoCA has been proven effective for showing early-stage dementia, or mild cognitive impairment. Additionally, MoCA is better than the MMSE at indicating if people with Parkinson's disease present signs of Parkinson's disease dementia. However, between the disadvantages of MoCA is the fact that it must be administered and graded by a healthcare professional and therefore an appointment with a nurse, doctor, or therapist is required, in opposition to other tests that can be taken at home. Furthermore, it does not provide a diagnosis, so it must be evaluated together with other tests including brain scans and a neurological testing, before the final diagnosis will be made (93). Finally, in an aging stroke population, hearing loss and visual impairment are problematic for administering a valid MoCA. This limits the generalizability of conclusions that can be drawn from epidemiological studies of CD and its evolution after stroke, although it is recognized that other performance-based cognitive assessment tools suffer from the same limitation (94).

According to published data, cognitive tests are the more clinically useful screening tools for use in community mental health centers. However, because of their poor sensitivity for detecting CD in this patient population, alternative screening methods should be explored. Therefore, there is great clinical need for an objective tool that can assess early the lesion pathophysiology and can predict the future evolution of the patient's CD.

6. From cognitive tests to combined brain/heart magnetic resonance imaging

Currently, the role of brain magnetic resonance (BMR) in patients with CD is primarily supportive than diagnostic. American and European guidelines recommend brain imaging to exclude treatable causes, such as tumor, hydrocephalus or intracranial hemorrhage, but also to distinguish between different dementia subtypes. However, this approach depends not only on guidelines, but also on the availability of imaging techniques at individual centers. Advanced MRI techniques, such as functional connectivity MRI, diffusion tensor imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy are now becoming available for clinical use in many specialized centers. The increasing research on CD identification at early stages will definitely increase the use of more objective approaches, such as BMR.

BMR is a robust, versatile modality capable to detect early brain alterations without radiation. In patients with long-standing, uncontrolled type 2 DM, white matter hyperintensity (WMH) in BMR has been associated with decreased processing speed (95). WMH is a brain lesion detected as a high-intensity area in MRI T2 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images (FLAIR) and reflects damage of small vessels in periventricular and subcortical areas. Although WMH was initially linked to the development of stroke, recently it was clarified that it is also associated with CD. In addition to hypertension, which is the classical risk factor for WMH, there is increasing evidence that DM could also be associated with WMH progression and CD. Although the factors that accelerate WMH formation in elderly diabetic patients are poorly clarified, it is currently known that insulin resistance is an exacerbating factor. However, hypertension, dyslipidemia and/or other vascular risk factors can also play an important role (96). Furthermore, brain atrophy is present in dementia-free middle-aged adults with type 2 DM. It seems that regional brain atrophy can be developed even in type 2 DM patients with no clinical evidence of microvascular disease. This is probably due to the fact that brain is particularly vulnerable to metabolic alterations prior to peripheral microvascular abnormalities, associated with other target organs (97).

Multiple vascular risk factors, including smoking, hypertension, DM and dyslipidemia are associated with CD. Among them, hypertension is more strongly associated with WMH, possibly due to cerebral microcirculation damage. There is currently evidence that intensive treatment of patients with cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension and dyslipidemia, can slow down the progression of WMH, compared to untreated controls (98). Furthermore, both atrial fibrillation and HF present high burden of WMH with consequent poorer cognitive performances and depression (92). Finally, complex congenital heart disease, including transposition of the great arteries or univentricular hearts, are associated with neonatal WMH (98).

In Neurology, volumetric MRI is becoming an increasingly important tool in the early detection and monitoring of people suspected to have mild CD and/or AD (93). Furthermore, the BMR evaluation of patients with AD and mild cognitive impairment has revealed early structural changes in the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex, and gray matter structures in the medial temporal lobe. The microstructural integrity of white matter can be studied with diffusion tensor imaging. Increased mean diffusivity and decreased fractional anisotropy are also found in subjects with white matter damage. Recently, magnetization transfer imaging was found to allow the assessment of ongoing global and regional brain damage, independent of atrophy, in patients with AD (99). Finally, WMH distributed in anterior brain regions is related to decline in executive abilities, typical of normal aging, whereas WMH distributed in more posterior brain regions is common in AD. Although epidemiological, observational and pathological studies suggest that WMH may be ischemic in origin and caused by consistent or variable hypoperfusion, there is emerging evidence that it may also reflect vascular deposition of β-amyloid, particularly when it is distributed in posterior areas and is found in patients with AD (100).

In Rheumatology, significant negative correlations between cognitive test scores on verbal memory and number/volume of WMH has been found in SLE, while no significant differences in the number or volume of WMH have been identified between subgroups of SLE patients (101). Furthermore, brain damage due to stroke either ischemic or hemorrhagic and silent vascular damage such as WMH is increased in ARDs (102). The risk of any stroke and BMR findings is worse in inflammatory arthropathies (RA, SLE, AS, gout, psoriatic arthritis) than in noninflammatory arthropathies (OA) (102). Plasma markers of inflammation (C-reactive protein, TNF-α, IL-6) are associated with stroke and increased WMH burden (102).

Although there is an increasing interest about incorporating BMR in the diagnostic algorithm of CD, there is no published evidence about the role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in the evaluation of CD. However, CMR can reveal silent cardiac lesions in both ischemic and nonischemic diseases that may lead to brain hypoperfusion with consequent CD. In this context, CMR was found to detect various phenotypes in diabetic CVD including myocardial scar, ischemia and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (103). Using the unique capability of CMR to provide sequences dedicated to myocardial function, structure, perfusion, cardiac energetics, lipid metabolism and diffuse extracellular volume expansion, CMR can offer a comprehensive, quantitative and reproducible tool to detect early on silent cardiac lesions in diabetic patients (104,105).

In the Cardiology literature, CMR is represented in the majority of the ESC guidelines (106). It is considered as the modality of choice to perform tissue characterization (differentiation of various types of scars, acute or chronic myocardial inflammation, iron overload), evaluate congenital heart diseases, quantify valvular regurgitation and assess great vessels (106). Furthermore, it is of great clinical significance in the evaluation of arrhythmogenic substrate in patients with ventricular tachycardia and sudden cardiac death (107).

In the Neurology literature, CMR with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) is the modality of choice for the detection of early cardiac involvement in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) (105). The early detection of cardiac involvement allows the initiation of various drugs including corticosteroids, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (106).

CMR has been also successfully used to identify vulnerable plaques in the thoracic aorta using 3D multi-contrast CMR and estimate the risk of cerebral embolization using 4D flow CMR in cryptogenic stroke patients (101). Although the literature about the use of CMR in the diagnostic algorithm of ischemic stroke is sparse, there are studies demonstrating its potential role in the diagnostic evaluation of cryptogenic stroke to identify potential causes such as cardiac thrombi, cardiac tumours, aortic arch disease and other rare cardiac anomalies (107). CMR can also provide information about functional and structural details of the left atrium and the left atrial appendage that are associated with ischemic stroke risk (108). Finally, cardiac involvement was assessed in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) without clinical cardiac symptoms and with a normal cardiac routine assessment. These findings may account for reported cardiac deaths in late-stage ALS patients (109,110).

In the domain of Rheumatology, there is recently a considerable increase in literature regarding the use of CMR for early detection/quantification and disease acuity assessment (oedema/fibrosis imaging) of cardiac involvement in various ARDs. In this context, proposals about the use of CMR in Rheumatology have been already published by a panel of specialists in both Cardiology and Rheumatology (111). Additionally, CMR has been successfully used to clarify the arrhythmogenic substrate in ARDs (111,112).

In contrast to CF testing, a combined MRI of brain/heart can reveal early pathophysiological changes that are potentially clinically silent but may seriously affect CF. Using this approach, subclinical brain involvement was found to be highly prevalent in ARD patients with cardiac symptoms and was mostly independent of the severity of cardiac involvement (113). It seems that a combined brain/heart MRI can be of value in the detection of CD pathophysiology and potentially facilitate therapeutic risk stratification. However, availability, doctors' familiarity with this approach and high cost should be taken into serious consideration. Finally, studies correlating cognitive tests with brain-heart MRI findings are needed to clarify their interaction in the assessment of CD. Additionally, studies regarding the cost/benefit ratio of this approach are also needed before final conclusions will be drawn. A comparison between CD testing and combined brain-heart MRI in the detection of CD is presented in Table I.

Table I

Comparison between testing and combined brain-heart MRI in the detection of CD.

Table I

Comparison between testing and combined brain-heart MRI in the detection of CD.

CD evaluation methodSensitivitySpecificityLocation of lesionAvailabilityCost
CD testing++++-++++Low
Combined brain and heart MRI++++++++++++++Very high

[i] CD, cognitive dysfunction; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging. Increasing + symbols indicate increased diagnostic capability of the method.

7. Conclusion

CD is the end-point of cardiovascular, neural, metabolic, and immune system impairment. CD testing, which is the most commonly used diagnostic approach, cannot always identify subclinical cases and the underlying pathophysiologic background of CD. A combined brain/heart MRI has the ability to diagnose these patients at an early stage and facilitate the individualization of risk stratification and early intervention. Furthermore, a combined brain-heart MRI is an objective approach that has no limitations of currently used CD tests. However, equipment availability, doctors' familiarity with this approach, and cost effectiveness are at the moment serious obstacles and should be taken into consideration, before brain/heart MRI in the diagnosis of CD is recommended in every day clinical practice.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors' contributions

GMM, FB and SIM recognized the scientific need for a review article on this topic and conceived the study. GMM, FB, GK, MRP, AG, AP, GDK, GPC and SIM designed the study structure, performed the literature search, screened and interpreted the findings. GMM wrote the initial draft. FB and SIM revised the original draft. GK, MRP, AG, AP, GDK and GPC enriched the manuscript and substantially revised the final draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Written consent was obtained from the patient for publication of the brain/heart MRI images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Stedman TL: Stedman's medical dictionary for the health professions and nursing. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 2012.

2 

Livingston G, Sommerlad A, Orgeta V, Costafreda SG, Huntley J, Ames D, Ballard C, Banerjee S, Burns A, Cohen-Mansfield J, et al: Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet. 390:2673–2734. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

McIntyre RS, Cha DS, Soczynska JK, Woldeyohannes HO, Gallaugher LA, Kudlow P, Alsuwaidan M and Baskaran A: Cognitive deficits and functional outcomes in major depressive disorder: Determinants, substrates, and treatment interventions. Depress Anxiety. 30:515–527. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Tarumi T and Zhang R: Cerebral blood flow in normal aging adults: Cardiovascular determinants, clinical implications, and aerobic fitness. J Neurochem. 144:595–608. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Zhou D, Meng R, Li SJ, Ya JY, Ding JY, Shang SL, Ding YC and Ji XM: Advances in chronic cerebral circulation insufficiency. CNS Neurosci Ther. 24:5–17. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Mergenthaler P, Lindauer U, Dienel GA and Meisel A: Sugar for the brain: The role of glucose in physiological and pathological brain function. Trends Neurosci. 36:587–597. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Barnes DE, Beiser AS, Lee A, Langa KM, Koyama A, Preis SR, Neuhaus J, McCammon RJ, Yaffe K, Seshadri S, et al: Development and validation of a brief dementia screening indicator for primary care. Alzheimers Dement. 10:656–665.e1. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL and Chertkow H: The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 53:695–699. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Molloy W and Clarnette R: Standardized mini-mental state examination: A user's guide. Troy: Newgrange Press, 1999.

10 

Borson S, Scanlan JM, Chen P and Ganguli M: The mini-cog as a screen for dementia: Validation in a population-based sample. J Am Geriatr Soc. 51:1451–1454. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Sbordone RJ: Limitations of neuropsychological testing to predict the cognitive and behavioral functioning of persons with brain injury in real-world settings. NeuroRehabilitation. 16:199–201. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Cullen B, O'Neill B, Evans JJ, Coen RF and Lawlor BA: A review of screening tests for cognitive impairment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 78:790–799. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

David AK, Taylor RB and Fields SA: Taylor's cardiovascular diseases: A handbook. Springer, New York, NY, 2004.

14 

Carbonara R, Giardinelli F, Zito A, Scicchitano P, Dentamaro I, Cortese F, Armenise A, Manca F, De Caro MF, Nazzaro P, et al: Neuro-psychological pattern in patients suffering from primitive dilated cardiomyopathy with impairment in executive function. Curr Neurovasc Res. 14:39–45. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Martis A, Gusetu G, Cismaru G, Zdrenghea D, Leucuta DC and Pop D: Improvement of cognitive function and interleukin 1 beta serum concentrations following cardiac pacemaker implantation in patients with symptomatic bradycardia. J Pers Med. 11(770)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Duschek S, Matthias E and Schandry R: Essential hypotension is accompanied by deficits in attention and working memory. Behav Med. 30:149–158. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Qiu C, von Strauss E, Fastbom J, Winblad B and Fratiglioni L: Low blood pressure and risk of dementia in the Kungsholmen project: A 6-year follow-up study. Arch Neurol. 60:223–228. 2003.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Waldstein SR, Giggey PP, Thayer JF and Zonderman AB: Nonlinear relations of blood pressure to cognitive function: The baltimore longitudinal study of aging. Hypertension. 45:374–379. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Hebert LE, Scherr PA, Bennett DA, Bienias JL, Wilson RS, Morris MC and Evans DA: Blood pressure and late-life cognitive function change: A biracial longitudinal population study. Neurology. 62:2021–2024. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Gomez CR, McLaughlin JR, Njemanze C and Nashed A: Effect of cardiac dysfunction upon diastolic cerebral blood flow. Angiology. 43:625–630. 1992.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Ettorre E, Cicerchia M, De Benedetto G, Fossati C, Guglielmi S, Manzon L, Servello A, Petrillo A and Marigliano V: A possible role of atrial fibrillation as a risk factor for dementia. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 49 (Suppl 1):S71–S76. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Beeri MS, Ravona-Springer R, Silverman JM and Haroutunian V: The effects of cardiovascular risk factors on cognitive compromise. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 11:201–212. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Waldstein SR and Wendell CR: Neurocognitive function and cardiovascular disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 20:833–842. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Jerskey BA, Cohen RA, Jefferson AL, Hoth KF, Haley AP, Gunstad JJ, Forman DE, Sweet LH and Poppas A: Sustained attention is associated with left ventricular ejection fraction in older adults with heart disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 15:137–141. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Jefferson AL, Poppas A, Paul RH and Cohen RA: Systemic hypoperfusion is associated with executive dysfunction in geriatric cardiac patients. Neurobiol Aging. 28:477–483. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Hoth KF, Poppas A, Ellison KE, Paul RH, Sokobin A, Cho Y and Cohen RA: Link between change in cognition and left ventricular function following cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 30:401–408. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Dixit NK, Vazquez LD, Cross NJ, Kuhl EA, Serber ER, Kovacs A, Dede DE, Conti JB and Sears SF: Cardiac resynchronization therapy: A pilot study examining cognitive change in patients before and after treatment. Clin Cardiol. 33:84–88. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Tisher A and Salardini A: A comprehensive update on treatment of dementia. Semin Neurol. 39:167–178. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Gay BE, Taylor KI, Hohl U, Tolnay M and Staehelin HB: The validity of clinical diagnoses of dementia in a group of consecutively autopsied memory clinic patients. J Nutr Health Aging. 12:132–137. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

30 

Brunnström H and Englund E: Clinicopathological concordance in dementia diagnostics. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 17:664–670. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

31 

Roman G: Diagnosis of vascular dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 120:9–13. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

32 

Jongen PJ, Ter Horst AT and Brands AM: Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Minerva Med. 103:73–96. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

33 

Mavrogeni S, Pons R, Nikas I, Papadopoulos G, Verganelakis DA, Kolovou G and Chrousos GP: Brain and heart magnetic resonance imaging/spectroscopy in duchenne muscular dystrophy. Eur J Clin Invest. 47:2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

34 

Vojinovic D, Adams HH, van der Lee SJ, Ibrahim-Verbaas CA, Brouwer R, van den Hout MC, Oole E, van Rooij J, Uitterlinden A, Hofman A, et al: The dystrophin gene and cognitive function in the general population. Eur J Hum Genet. 23:837–843. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Jaaro-Peled H and Sawa A: Neurodevelopmental factors in schizophrenia. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 43:263–274. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

36 

Rolls ET: The cingulate cortex and limbic systems for emotion, action, and memory. Brain Struct Funct. 224:3001–3018. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Bressi S, Miele L, Bressi C, Astori S, Gimosti E, Linciano AD, Sessini M and Invernizzi G: Deficit of central executive component of working memory in schizophrenia. New Trends Exp Clin Psychiatry. 12:243–252. 1996.

38 

Gold JM, Carpenter C, Randolph C, Goldberg TE and Weinberger DR: Auditory working memory and wisconsin card sorting test performance in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 54:159–165. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Buchsbaum MS and Hazlett EA: Positron emission tomography studies of abnormal glucose metabolism in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 24:343–364. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Spitzer M: The psychopathology, neuropsychology, and neurobiology of associative and working memory in schizophrenia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 243:57–70. 1993.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

41 

Stone M, Gabrieli JD, Stebbins GT and Sullivan EV: Working and strategic memory deficits in schizophrenia. Neuropsychology. 12:278–288. 1998.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

42 

Goldberg TE, Saint-Cry JA and Weinberger DR: Assessment of procedural learning and problem solving in schizophrenic patients by Tower of Hanoi type tasks. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2:165–173. 1990.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

43 

Braff DL, Heaton R, Kuck J, Cullum M, Moranville J, Grant I and Zisook S: The generalized pattern of neuropsychological deficits in outpatients with chronic schizophrenia with heterogeneous wisconsin card sorting test results. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 48:891–898. 1991.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

44 

Voruganti LN, Heslegrave RJ and Awad AG: Neurocognitive correlates of positive and negative syndromes in schizophrenia. Can J Psychiatry. 42:1066–1071. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Young DA, Davila R and Scher H: Unawareness of illness and neuropsychological performance in chronic schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 10:117–124. 1993.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Carrion C, Folkvord F, Anastasiadou D and Aymerich M: Cognitive therapy for dementia patients: A systematic review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 46:1–26. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

47 

Clark LD, Iversen SD and Goodwin GM: Sustained attention deficit in bipolar disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 180:313–319. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

48 

Drubach DA: Obsessive-compulsive disorder. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 21 (3 Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychiatry):783–788. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

49 

Zielinski CM, Taylor MA and Juzwin KR: Neuropsychological deficits in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 4:110–126. 1991.

50 

Loades ME, Chalder T, Smakowski A and Rimes KA: Anticipation of and response to exercise in adolescents with CFS: An experimental study. J Psychosom Res. 146(110490)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

51 

Lee CH and Giuliani F: The role of inflammation in depression and fatigue. Front Immunol. 10(1696)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

52 

Abbey SE and Garfenkel PE: Chronic fatigue syndrome and depression: Cause, effect, or covariate. Rev Infect Dis. 13 (Suppl 1):S73–S83. 1991.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

53 

Woods SP, Lovejoy DW and Ball JD: Neuropsychological characteristics of adults with ADHD: A comprehensive review of initial studies. Clin Neuropsychol. 16:12–34. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

54 

Magnin E and Maurs C: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder during adulthood. Rev Neurol (Paris). 173:506–515. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

55 

Blume AW, Schmaling KB and Marlatt GA: Memory, executive cognitive function, and readiness to change drinking behavior. Addict Behav. 30:301–314. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

56 

Mohammadian J and Miladi-Gorji H: Age- and sex-related changes in the severity of physical and psychological dependence in morphine-dependent rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 187(172793)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

57 

Allen DN and Landis RKB: Neuropsychological correlates of substance use disorders. In: Clinical neuropsychology: A pocket handbook for assessment. Snyder PJ and Nassbaum PD (eds). American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp591-612, 1998.

58 

Bates ME, Bowden SC and Barry D: Neurocognitive impairment associated with alcohol use disorders: Implications for treatment. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 10:193–212. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

59 

Wessels AM, Scheltens P, Barkhof F and Heine RJ: Hyperglycaemia as a determinant of cognitive decline in patients with type 1 diabetes. Eur J Pharmacol. 585:88–96. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

60 

Munshi MN: Cognitive dysfunction in older adults with diabetes: What a clinician needs to know. Diabetes Care. 40:461–467. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

61 

Gonder-Frederick LA, Zrebiec JF, Bauchowitz AU, Ritterband LM, Magee JC, Cox DJ and Clarke WL: Cognitive function is disrupted by both hypo- and hyperglycemia in school-aged children with type 1 diabetes: A field study. Diabetes Care. 32:1001–1006. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

62 

Strachan MW: R D Lawrence Lecture 2010. The brain as a target organ in type 2 diabetes: Exploring the links with cognitive impairment and dementia. Diabet Med. 28:141–147. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

63 

Maric-Bilkan C: Sex differences in micro- and macro-vascular complications of diabetes mellitus. Clin Sci (Lond). 131:833–846. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

64 

Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study Research Group. Jacobson AM, Musen G, Ryan CM, Silvers N, Cleary P, Waberski B, Burwood A, Weinger K, Bayless M, et al: Long-term effect of diabetes and its treatment on cognitive function. N Engl J Med. 356:1842–1852. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

65 

Jacobson AM, Ryan CM, Cleary PA, Waberski BH, Weinger K, Musen G and Dahms W: Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/EDIC Research Group. Biomedical risk factors for decreased cognitive functioning in type 1 diabetes: An 18 year follow-up of the diabetes control and complications Trial (DCCT) cohort. Diabetologia. 54:245–255. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

66 

Mukherjee P, Mazumdar S, Goswami S, Bhowmik J, Chakroborty S, Mukhopadhyay S, Jana S, Chakraborty A, Pal S, Das SK and Mukhopadhyay J: Cognitive dysfunction in diabetic patients with special reference to age of onset, duration and control of diabetes. Act Nerv Super. 54:263–275. 2012.

67 

Luchsinger JA, Ryan C and Launer LJ: Diabetes and Cognitive Impairment. In: Diabetes in America. Cowie CC, Casagrande SS, Menke A, Cissell MA, Eberhardt MS, Meigs JB, Gregg EW, Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Becker DJ, et al (eds). 3rd edition. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US), Bethesda, MD, Chapter 24, 2018.

68 

Cukierman-Yaffe T: Diabetes, dysglycemia and cognitive dysfunction. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 30:341–345. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

69 

Sato N and Morishita R: Roles of vascular and metabolic components in cognitive dysfunction of Alzheimer disease: Short- and long-term modification by non-genetic risk factors. Front Aging Neurosci. 5(64)2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

70 

Joaquim AF and Appenzeller S: Neuropsychiatric manifestations in rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmun Rev. 14:1116–1122. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

71 

Shin SY, Katz P, Wallhagen M and Julian L: Cognitive impairment in persons with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 64:1144–1150. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

72 

Gorelick PB: Role of inflammation in cognitive impairment: Results of observational epidemiological studies and clinical trials. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1207:155–162. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

73 

Simos P, Ktistaki G, Dimitraki G, Papastefanakis E, Kougkas N, Fanouriakis A, Gergianaki I, Bertsias G, Sidiropoulos P and Karademas EC: Cognitive deficits early in the course of rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 38:820–829. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

74 

Szekanecz Z, Kerekes G, Dér H, Sándor Z, Szabó Z, Végvári A, Simkovics E, Soós L, Szentpétery A, Besenyei T, et al: Accelerated atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1108:349–358. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

75 

Coluccia D, Wolf OT, Kollias S, Roozendaal B, Forster A and de Quervain DJ: Glucocorticoid therapy-induced memory deficits: Acute versus chronic effects. J Neurosci. 28:3474–3478. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

76 

Hanly JG, Kozora E, Beyea SD and Birnbaum J: Review: Nervous system disease in systemic lupus erythematosus: Current status and future directions. Arthritis Rheumatol. 71:33–42. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

77 

Kello N, Anderson E and Diamond B: Cognitive dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus: A case for initiating trials. Arthritis Rheumatol. 71:1413–1425. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

78 

Hanly JG, Urowitz MB, Su L, Bae SC, Gordon C, Wallace DJ, Clarke A, Bernatsky S, Isenberg D, Rahman A, et al: Prospective analysis of neuropsychiatric events in an international disease inception cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 69:529–535. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

79 

Steup-Beekman GM, Zirkzee EJ, Cohen D, Gahrmann BM, Emmer BJ, Steens SC, Bollen EL, van Buchem MA and Huizinga TW: Neuropsychiatric manifestations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Epidemiology and radiology pointing to an immune-mediated cause. Ann Rheum Dis. 72 (Suppl 2):ii76–ii79. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

80 

Schwartz N, Stock AD and Putterman C: Neuropsychiatric lupus: New mechanistic insights and future treatment directions. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 15:137–152. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

81 

Bertsias GK, Ioannidis JP, Aringer M, Bollen E, Bombardieri S, Bruce IN, Cervera R, Dalakas M, Doria A, Hanly JG, et al: EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus with neuropsychiatric manifestations: Report of a task force of the EULAR standing committee for clinical affairs. Ann Rheum Dis. 69:2074–2082. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

82 

Brey RL, Gharavi AE and Lockshin MD: Neurologic complications of antiphospholipid antibodies. Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 19:833–850. 1993.PubMed/NCBI

83 

Stock AD, Gelb S, Pasternak O, Ben-Zvi A and Putterman C: The blood brain barrier and neuropsychiatric lupus: New perspectives in light of advances in understanding the neuroimmune interface. Autoimmun Rev. 16:612–619. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

84 

Barraclough M, McKie S, Parker B, Jackson A, Pemberton P, Elliott R and Bruce IN: Altered cognitive function in systemic lupus erythematosus and associations with inflammation and functional and structural brain changes. Ann Rheum Dis. 78:934–940. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

85 

Ploran E, Tang C, Mackay M, Small M, Anderson E, Storbeck J, Bascetta B, Kang S, Aranow C, Sartori C, et al: Assessing cognitive impairment in SLE: Examining relationships between resting glucose metabolism and anti-NMDAR antibodies with navigational performance. Lupus Sci Med. 6(e000327)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

86 

Mackay M, Vo A, Tang CC, Small M, Anderson EW, Ploran EJ, Storbeck J, Bascetta B, Kang S, Aranow C, et al: Metabolic and microstructural alterations in the SLE brain correlate with cognitive impairment. JCI Insight: Jan 10, 2019 (Epub ahead of print).

87 

Mouthon L, Alami S, Boisard AS, Chaigne B, Hachulla E and Poiraudeau S: Patients' views and needs about systemic sclerosis and its management: A qualitative interview study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 18(230)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

88 

Penn H, Howie AJ, Kingdon EJ, Bunn CC, Stratton RJ, Black CM, Burns A and Denton CP: Scleroderma renal crisis: Patient characteristics and long-term outcomes. QJM. 100:485–494. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

89 

Pakozdi A, Nihtyanova S, Moinzadeh P, Ong VH, Black CM and Denton CP: Clinical and serological hallmarks of systemic sclerosis overlap syndromes. J Rheumatol. 38:2406–2409. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

90 

De Stefano P, Chizzolini C, Lalive PH and Lascano AM: Limbic encephalitis associated with systemic sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 24:142–144. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

91 

Giuliodori G, Fraticelli P, Bartolini M, Cagnetti C, Baruffaldi R, Rocchi MB, Provinciali L, Gabrielli A and Silvestrini M: Cognitive and cerebral hemodynamic impairment in scleroderma patients. Eur J Neurol. 16:1285–1290. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

92 

Alcocer-Castillejos N, Jiménez-González A and Hinojosa-Azaola A: No difference in cognitive dysfunction among patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis, rheumatoid arthritis or chronic kidney disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 25:595–602. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

93 

Athilingam P, King KB, Burgin SW, Acker-man M, Cushman LA and Chen L: Montreal cognitive assessment and mini-mental status examination compared as cognitive screening tools in heart failure. Heart Lung. 40:521–529. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

94 

Koski L: Validity and applications of the montreal cognitive assessment for the assessment of vascular cognitive impairment. Cerebrovasc Dis. 36:6–18. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

95 

Mankovsky B, Zherdova N, van den Berg E, Biessels GJ and de Bresser J: Cognitive functioning and structural brain abnormalities in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 35:1663–1670. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

96 

Tamura Y and Araki A: Diabetes mellitus and white matter hyperintensity. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 15 (Suppl 1):S34–S42. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

97 

Fang F, Zhan YF, Zhuo YY, Yin DZ, Li KA and Wang YF: Brain atrophy in middle-aged subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with and without microvascular complications. J Diabetes. 10:625–632. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

98 

Moroni F, Ammirati E, Rocca MA, Filippi M, Magnoni M and Camici PG: Cardiovascular disease and brain health: Focus on white matter hyperintensities. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 19:63–69. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

99 

Yin C, Li S, Zhao W and Feng J: Brain imaging of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Neural Regen Res. 8:435–444. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

100 

Brickman AM, Muraskin J and Zimmerman ME: Structural neuroimaging in Altheimer's disease: Do white matter hyperintensities matter? Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 11:181–190. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

101 

Cannerfelt B, Nystedt J, Jönsen A, Lätt J, van Westen D, Lilja A, Bengtsson A, Nilsson P, Mårtensson J and Sundgren PC: White matter lesions and brain atrophy in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: Correlation to cognitive dysfunction in a cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus patients using different definition models for neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 27:1140–1149. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

102 

Wiseman SJ, Ralston SH and Wardlaw JM: Cerebrovascular disease in rheumatic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke. 47:943–950. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

103 

Liu X, Yang ZG, Gao Y, Xie LJ, Jiang L, Hu BY, Diao KY, Shi K, Xu HY, Shen MT, et al: Left ventricular subclinical myocardial dysfunction in uncomplicated type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with impaired myocardial perfusion: A contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 17(139)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

104 

Shah RV, Abbasi SA and Kwong RY: Role of cardiac MRI in diabetes. Curr Cardiol Rep. 16(449)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

105 

Mavrogeni SI, Markousis-Mavrogenis G, Papavasiliou A, Papadopoulos G and Kolovou G: Cardiac involvement in duchenne muscular dystrophy and related dystrophinopathies. Methods Mol Biol. 1687:31–42. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

106 

von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F and Schulz-Menger J: Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the guidelines of the European society of cardiology. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 18(6)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

107 

Mavrogeni S, Petrou E, Kolovou G, Theodorakis G and Iliodromitis E: Prediction of ventricular arrhythmias using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 14:518–525. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

108 

Wehrum T, Dragonu I, Strecker C, Schuchardt F, Hennemuth A, Drex J, Reinhard T, Böhringer D, Vach W, Hennig J and Harloff A: Aortic atheroma as a source of stroke-assessment of embolization risk using 3D CMR in stroke patients and controls. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 19(67)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

109 

Yaghi S, Liberman AL, Atalay M, Song C, Furie KL, Kamel H and Bernstein RA: Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: A new tool to identify cardioaortic sources in ischaemic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 88:31–37. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

110 

Rosenbohm A, Schmid B, Buckert D, Rottbauer W, Kassubek J, Ludolph AC and Bernhardt P: Cardiac findings in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A magnetic resonance imaging study. Front Neurol. 8(479)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

111 

Mavrogeni SI, Kitas GD, Dimitroulas T, Sfikakis PP, Seo P, Gabriel S, Patel AR, Gargani L, Bombardieri S, Matucci-Cerinic M, et al: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in rheumatology: Current status and recommendations for use. Int J Cardiol. 217:135–148. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

112 

Mavrogeni S, Gargani L, Pepe A, Monti L, Markousis-Mavrogenis G, De Santis M, De Marchi D, Koutsogeorgopoulou L, Karabela G, Stavropoulos E, et al: Cardiac magnetic resonance predicts ventricular arrhythmias in scleroderma: The scleroderma arrhythmia clinical utility study (SAnCtUS). Rheumatology (Oxford). 59:1938–1948. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

113 

Mavrogeni SI, Sfikakis PP, Markousis-Mavrogenis G, Bournia VK, Poulos G, Koutsogeorgopoulou L, Karabela G, Stavropoulos E, Katsifis G, Boki K, et al: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging pattern in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases and ventricular tachycardia with preserved ejection fraction. Int J Cardiol. 284:105–109. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

September-2022
Volume 24 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Markousis‑Mavrogenis G, Bacopoulou F, Kolovou G, Pons M, Giannakopoulou A, Papavasiliou A, Kitas GD, Chrousos GP and Mavrogeni SI: Pathophysiology of cognitive dysfunction and the role of combined brain/heart magnetic resonance imaging (Review). Exp Ther Med 24: 569, 2022.
APA
Markousis‑Mavrogenis, G., Bacopoulou, F., Kolovou, G., Pons, M., Giannakopoulou, A., Papavasiliou, A. ... Mavrogeni, S.I. (2022). Pathophysiology of cognitive dysfunction and the role of combined brain/heart magnetic resonance imaging (Review). Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 24, 569. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2022.11506
MLA
Markousis‑Mavrogenis, G., Bacopoulou, F., Kolovou, G., Pons, M., Giannakopoulou, A., Papavasiliou, A., Kitas, G. D., Chrousos, G. P., Mavrogeni, S. I."Pathophysiology of cognitive dysfunction and the role of combined brain/heart magnetic resonance imaging (Review)". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 24.3 (2022): 569.
Chicago
Markousis‑Mavrogenis, G., Bacopoulou, F., Kolovou, G., Pons, M., Giannakopoulou, A., Papavasiliou, A., Kitas, G. D., Chrousos, G. P., Mavrogeni, S. I."Pathophysiology of cognitive dysfunction and the role of combined brain/heart magnetic resonance imaging (Review)". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 24, no. 3 (2022): 569. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2022.11506