CCL2 promotes proliferation, migration and angiogenesis through the MAPK/ERK1/2/MMP9, PI3K/AKT, Wnt/β‑catenin signaling pathways in HUVECs
- Authors:
- Published online on: December 27, 2022 https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2022.11776
- Article Number: 77
-
Copyright: © Peng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Bone defects caused by high-energy trauma, bone tumors, limb deformities and bone infections can lead to poor and delayed bone healing, and nonunion (1,2). Although bone tissue can be completely regenerated in the body with time, bone defects that are beyond the critical length range of self-repair experience difficulty in self-repair and reconstruction to restore normal bone length and stiffness (3). Bone is a highly vascularized, unique, complex and dynamic tissue with regenerative properties that can repair itself and restore its original structural integrity after injury or destruction, although bone damage can lead to a host of additional problems, such as ruptured blood vessels, hematoma formation and nerve damage, as it is accompanied by local tissue hypoxia with the release of systemic cytokines stimulating the formation of fresh blood vessels in the bone defect site (4). Angiogenesis is a complex process involving various cell interactions, growth factor stimulation and biomechanics. Angiogenesis originates from the production of matrix metalloproteinases in endothelial cells, which degrade the basement membrane to promote endothelial cell migration (5). Endothelial cell migration is a key component of the angiogenic response, and endothelial cells move toward areas with high concentrations of VEGF and other growth factors through the proteolytic basement membrane (6). When endothelial cells relocate into tissue, they reproduce and differentiate to construct new blood vessels. The regeneration of bone is based on the interaction between osteogenesis and angiogenesis, largely depending on angiogenesis, which serves a crucial role in bone repair and remodeling. Angiogenesis refers to the reproduction and migration of endothelial cells to the sites of original blood vessels to form a new crisscross vascular network, continuously providing sufficient nutrients, cytokines, neurotransmitters and oxygen for bone cells, bone tissue and the inner and outer membranes of bone (7). Therefore, understanding how to effectively promote angiogenesis in bone defects may serve an important role in bone repair.
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, also known as CC motif ligand 2 (CCL2), an effective chemokine of monocytes, is a member of the CC chemokine family and was the first human chemokine to be discovered. It is produced or induced by multiple types of cells in the body in response to oxidative stress. It serves a valuable role in various pathophysiological processes, such as inducing macrophages, immune stress, recruitment, inflammatory response (8), angiogenesis, cell proliferation, migration and wound repair (9). It also stimulates directional or nondirectional cell migration (10). Although CCL2 has been reported to promote angiogenesis, the detailed mechanism of CCL2 has yet to be fully elucidated. In addition, examining the underlying mechanism by which CCL2 promotes angiogenesis will yield novel functional benefits to promote rapid reconstruction and repair of bone defects. Therefore, the present study investigated the mechanism of CCL2 in angiogenesis for bone defect repair and remodeling using cell and animal model experiments.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were obtained from ScienCell Research Laboratories, Inc (cat. no. 8000). HUVECs were grown in DMEM (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) containing 10% FBS (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.), and cultured in a cell incubator at 95% humidity at 37˚C with 5% carbon dioxide. Ethics approval for the use of HUVECs was not required according to our institute's guidelines (http://www.gdmuah.com/info/1851/8954.htm).
Antibodies and reagents
CCL2 (cat. no. M1203-03S) was purchased from United States Biological. Antibodies against rho-associated coiled-coil-containing protein kinase (Rock)1 (cat. no. #4035), N-cadherin (cat. no. #13116), c-Myc (cat. no. #18583), phosphorylated (p-)ERK1/2 (cat. no. #4370), p-AKT (cat. no. #13038), AKT (cat. no. #4691), Wnt5a/b (cat. no. #2530), low-density lipoprotein receptor related protein 6 (LRP-6; cat. no. #3395), β-catenin (cat. no. #8480), p-PI3K (cat. no. #17366), PI3K (cat. no. #4257), GAPDH (cat. no. #5174) and α-tubulin (cat. no. #2125) and the secondary antibodies goat anti-rabbit IgG (cat. no. #7074) and anti-mouse IgG (cat. no. #7076) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. VEGFR2 (cat. no. ab134191) and MMP9 (cat. no. ab228402) antibodies were obtained from Abcam. Antibodies against Rock2 (cat. no. sc-398519), ERK1/2 (cat. no. sc-514302) and VEGF (cat. no. sc-57496) were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.
Cell proliferation assay
HUVECs (2x103 cells per well) were seeded into 96-well plates in ~100 µl total medium, incubated at 37˚C for 24 h, and then treated with various concentrations (0, 25, 50, 75, 100 and 150 ng/ml) of CCL2 at 37˚C for 0-96 h. Following addition of 10 µl Cell Counting Kit-8 (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) solution per well and incubation at 37˚C for 2 h, the OD value was determined by a microplate reader (MK3; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at OD 450 nm.
Transwell migration assay
The fresh serum-free DMEM (100 µl) containing 2x104 HUVECs and various concentrations (0, 50, and 100 ng/ml) of CCL2 was added to the upper chamber. The lower chamber was filled with 500 µl of medium containing 10% FBS and cells were incubated at 37˚C for 24 h. Subsequently, cells that remained in the upper chamber without successfully migrating were wiped away. Cells on the membrane were fixed in methanol at room temperature for 15 min and stained with crystal violet staining solution at 37˚C for 15 min. The cells were imaged in six random microscopic fields (magnification, x100) under a light microscope (Olympus Corporation). Migrated cells (% of control)=(migrated cells treated with 50 or 100 ng/ml CCL2﹣migrated cells treated with 0 ng/ml CCL2)/migrated cells treated with 0 ng/ml CCL2 x100.
Wound healing assay
HUVECs were cultured for 24 h in 6-well plates with lines at the bottom of the plate. When the cell fusion rate approached 100%, a 100-µl pipette tip was used to draw a line perpendicular to the mark line in the culture plate, and PBS was used to clean the culture well twice. Cells that had come loose were removed, 2 ml serum-free medium with various concentrations of CCL2 (0, 50 and 100 ng/ml) was added and cells were placed back in the incubator for further culture. Subsequently, the migration distance of HUVECs imaged under a light microscope (Olympus Corporation) at 0 and 24 h was compared, the migration area was calculated and the effect of different treatments on cell migration was analyzed. Migration area (%)=(migration area at 0 h﹣migration area at 24 h)/migration area at 0 h x100.
Tube formation assay
HUVECs (1.5x104) were cultured with different doses of CCL2 (0, 25, 50 and 100 ng/ml) in DMEM in Matrigel-precoated (37˚C; 30 min) angiogenesis slides at 37˚C with 5% CO2. After 4 h of incubation, tube formation was observed under a light microscope (Olympus Corporation) and images were captured for five randomly selected microscopic fields and tube formation was analyzed using ImageJ software (v1.8.0; National Institutes of Health).
Western blotting
Total protein was collected with an appropriate amount of protein RIPA lysis buffer (PMSF:RIPA=1:100; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) was used to measure protein concentration and each sample adjusted to the same concentration. Proteins (20 µg/lane) were separated by SDS-PAGE on 10 and 12% separation gels. After gel electrophoresis (100 V; 2 h), membrane transfer (250 V; 2.5 h) and blocking (5% skimmed milk; room temperature; 2 h), the 0.2 µm pore size PVDF membranes (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) were incubated with primary antibodies (diluted 1:1,000) overnight at 4˚C. Subsequently, the membranes were washed with TBS with 0.1% Tween-20 (three times; 10 min) before addition of the secondary antibody (diluted 1:3,000) at room temperature for 1 h. Finally, the immunoreactive membranes were imaged using a Chemiluminescent and Fluorescent Imaging System (Tanon 5200; Tanon Science and Technology Co., Ltd.), and the gray levels of the protein bands were determined using ImageJ software (v1.8.0, National Institutes of Health).
Establishment of bone defects in a Sprague Dawley (SD) rat model
All animal experiments were approved by the Laboratory Animal Ethics Committee of Guangdong Medical University (Zhanjiang, China; ID Number: GDY1902126; date: 25.05.2019). The SD rats (Guangdong Medical Laboratory Animal Center) were maintained at 2 or 3 rats/cage under a 12-h light/dark cycle with adequate water and standard food, at temperatures of 22-24˚C and relative humidity of ~45%. Depending on the types of intervention, 12-week-old male SD rats (n=32) weighing 350-400 g were selected and randomly divided into four groups: Group A (simple bone defect not filled in), Group B [poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)/tricalcium phosphate (PLGA/TCP) porous scaffold; 5x5x5 mm3 filled in], Group C (PLGA/TCP porous scaffold + Gelma hydrogel filled in) and Group D (PLGA/TCP porous scaffold + Gelma hydrogel + 1 µg CCL2 filled in). The number of rats in each group was eight. The rats were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection with pentobarbital sodium at a concentration of 1% at a dose of 30 mg/kg. The appropriate degree of anesthesia was assessed by the characteristics of stable breathing, sluggish corneal reflex, generalized muscle relaxation and loss of skin pinch response. After group assignment, the left femur of each rat was subjected to 3 mm midline osteotomy under anesthesia, and the bone defect area was filled or not filled according to the experimental group allocation. Furthermore, the left femur was fixed using an external fixator (Fig. S1). The bone defects establishment of each SD rat lasted ~40-60 min. The specific criteria for SD rat sacrifice were that rats were close to succumbing, with persistent dyspnea, inability to ingest food, significant loss of appetite, weight loss of >20% (the maximum percentage of body weight loss observed in the present study was ~10%), severe ulceration, heavy bleeding and limb paralysis. Penicillin sodium (80,000 units/kg/d;) was intramuscularly injected after surgery to prevent infection for 1 week and the surgical incision was disinfected with iodophor every day. The rats were monitored daily for surgical incision, mental status, diet, body weight, activity and excretion. Subsequently, each group was observed for 4 weeks, at which point half of the specimens were collected, and 8 weeks, at which point the other half of the specimens were collected. The SD rats were sacrificed with 10% sodium pentobarbital at a dose of 200 mg/kg by intraperitoneal injection. Mortality was verified by confirming the arrest of breathing, the disappearance of heartbeat and light reflex, and the dilation of pupils in SD rats. Finally, the femurs of the left leg were removed and fixed in 10% neutral formalin solution for 48 h and then stored in 75% ethanol.
Immunohistochemistry
After 10% formalin fixation at 4˚C for 48 h and EDTA solution (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd.) decalcification (2 months), bone tissue was dehydrated with gradient ethanol and xylene (75% ethanol for 1 h; 85% ethanol for 1 h; 95% ethanol for 1 h; 100% ethanol for 1 h; xylene I for 30 min; xylene II for 1 h) at room temperature. Subsequently, the bone tissue was embedded in paraffin (65˚C). After tissue sectioning (4 µm), bone callus sections were hydrated, blocked with 5% BSA (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) for 1 h, and incubated with the VEGF primary antibody (diluted 1:200) at 4˚C overnight. After subsequent secondary antibody (diluted 1:200) incubation (room temperature; 30 min), 3,3'-diaminobenzidine dyeing solution (5 min) and hematoxylin (2 sec) were added for staining at room temperature. The images were captured under a light microscope (Olympus Corporation).
Statistical analysis
All experimental results in the present study were obtained from experiments repeated in at least three replicates. All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. ImageJ (National Institutes of Health), SPSS Statistics 19.0 software (IBM Corp.) and GraphPad Prism 8.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.) were used to analyze the data and create the graphs, respectively. Unpaired Student's t-test was used for comparisons between groups. Statistical differences between ≥3 groups were determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
CCL2 promotes proliferation of HUVECs
Cell proliferation assays revealed that CCL2 increased HUVEC proliferation in a concentration- and time-dependent manner (Fig. 1A).
CCL2 boosts the migration of HUVECs
The migration of HUVECs was measured using Transwell migration assay and wound healing assay. After treatment with different doses of CCL2 (0, 50 and 100 ng/ml) for 24 h, the cells that pierced the polycarbonate membrane and the coalescing wound areas were observed under a microscope at a magnification of x100. The results of the cell migration assay revealed that the numbers of migrated cells (% of control) of HUVECs were 100, 223±7 and 304±6% respectively (Fig. 1B). As shown in Fig. 1C, the migration area of HUVECs was compared among different treatment conditions. In addition, the results demonstrated that the migration areas of HUVECs were 30±5, 62±3, and 76±2%, respectively. The experiments revealed that CCL2 boosted the migration of HUVECs.
CCL2 promotes tube formation in HUVECs
One of the most essential steps in the processes of angiogenesis is endothelial cell proliferation, and the regeneration of new blood vessels is required for bone tissue growth. Vessel formation serves a key role in tissue rebuilding (11). HUVECs exposed to different concentrations of CCL2 were cultured in Matrigel, and then the construction of capillary-like structures was imaged by microscopy at a magnification of x100. Tube formation was assessed based on the number of branch points and capillary length indexes. Following treatment with different doses of CCL2 (0, 25, 50 and 100 ng/ml) for 4 h, the branch points of tube formation were 23±3, 38±2, 47±2 and 57±2. In addition, the capillary lengths (100% of control) of tube formation were 100, 132±9, 153±6, and 162±9% respectively (Fig. 1D). The results revealed that CCL2 at a suitable concentration had a positive effect on tube formation.
CCL2 promotes the expression levels of proteins related to proliferation, migration and vascularization in HUVECs
A number of studies have reported that Rock1, Rock2, N-cadherin and c-Myc are closely associated with proliferation and migration, and VEGFR2 is associated with vascularization (12-15). According to the results of western blotting, HUVECs treated with CCL2 exhibited marked expression of these markers (Fig. 2A). Therefore, we hypothesized that CCL2 serves a significant role in the proliferation, migration and vascularization of HUVECs.
CCL2 upregulates the PI3K/AKT, ERK1/2 and β-catenin signaling pathways to promote the proliferation and migration of HUVECs
The PI3K/AKT, ERK1/2 and β-catenin signaling pathways are related to cell proliferation and migration (16-18). To gain further insights into the molecular mechanism whereby CCL2 alters HUVEC behavior, the present study investigated the effect of CCL2 on the PI3K/AKT, ERK1/2 and β-catenin signaling pathways. Western blotting revealed that CCL2 treatment of HUVECs increased the levels of p-AKT, p-PI3K, p-ERK1/2, MMP9, Wnt5a/b, β-catenin and LRP-6 (Fig. 2B-D). Therefore, it was hypothesized that CCL2 may exert a positive regulatory effect on proliferation and migration in HUVECs by inducing these signaling pathways.
Immunohistochemistry
Femoral samples collected at 4 and 8 weeks after the bone defect operation underwent EDTA decalcification and immunohistochemical staining. The results revealed that there was an increase in the expression area of VEGF in CCL2-treated groups (Fig. 3).
Discussion
Large bone defects caused by trauma, bone tumors, limb deformity and bone infection are major clinical challenges in orthopedics and have become a focus of research in the field of orthopedics (2,19). In the context of bone defects, angiogenesis and bone defect reconstruction are closely related in space and time and achieving adequate vascular development within regenerating bone tissue remains a significant challenge (20). The formation of blood vessels regulates the function of osteoblasts during bone regeneration and is an important regulator of bone regeneration (21). This interconnection between osteogenesis and angiogenesis is called ‘angiogenesis-osteogenesis coupling’, which promotes the repair and reconstruction of bone defects (22,23). VEGF, which is involved in the possible mechanisms of angiogenesis and osteogenic coupling, serves an important role between angiogenesis and bone remodeling (14,24). VEGF binds to three types of receptor tyrosine kinases in mammals, VEGFR1, VEGFR2 and VEGFR3(25), which mediate endothelial cell regeneration, angiogenesis and regulation of vascular permeability (26). The VEGF family, including VEGFA-D serve an influential role in angiogenesis and development, especially VEGFA, which is the major factor in angiogenesis and works primarily through VEGFR2(27). In present study, the tube formation assay revealed that CCL2 promoted angiogenesis in HUVECs. High expression levels of the angiogenesis-associated protein VEGFR2 following CCL2 treatment also suggested that CCL2 promoted angiogenesis. The results of immunohistochemical staining of the collected femoral specimens demonstrated that VEGF expression was markedly increased in the group supplemented with CCL2, which also confirmed that CCL2 induced angiogenesis associated with bone defect repair and reconstruction. These results demonstrated that CCL2 promoted vascular formation in HUVECs, and drove angiogenesis and osteogenic coupling-related protein VEGF expression.
Cadherin may activate some transduction pathways, including the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, which serves a crucial role in the growth and development of cells and tissues (28). N-cadherin is a type of transmembrane glycoprotein that mediates the adhesion between endothelial cells and pericytes and is closely related to the formation and maintenance of blood vessels (29). N-cadherin promotes cell migration, mobility and polarity through intracellular signaling at cell-cell junctions (30,31). Rock is known as an effector switch that regulates a range of cell biological processes, including cell adhesion, proliferation, migration and gene expression (32,33). The most typical downstream receptors of ras homolog family member A are the serine/threonine kinases Rock1 and Rock2, which are two subtypes of the Rock gene (34). Rock1 participates in regulation of the signaling pathways of cell migration (35) and promotes formation of the actin network (36). Rock1 may mediate the recruitment and adhesion of circulating leukocytes and inflammatory cells to sites of vascular injury to form a new intima (37). Similar to Rock1, Rock2 is a key gene for biological functions related to the transfer process, including the destruction of adhesion, remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton, enhancement of cell activity and regulation of signaling pathways (38), such as cell proliferation and migration. A study reported that c-Myc regulates the expression of thousands of downstream genes related to the regulation of cell proliferation, migration and apoptosis, affecting biological metabolism, transcriptional expression, protein synthesis and cell cycle regulation (39). Furthermore, as a key regulator of tissue growth, angiogenesis and the expression of angiogenic regulatory factors, c-Myc participates in the dominant regulation of the angiogenic network architecture. By contrast, c-Myc deficiency decreases the expression of VEGF (40), which affects the construction of vascular tissue. The results of the present study revealed that CCL2 treatment promoted the proliferation and migration of HUVECs in a concentration-dependent manner as demonstrated by the increased expression of the proliferation- and migration-related proteins Rock1, Rock2, N-cad and c-Myc in HUVECs. These results demonstrated that CCL2 promoted proliferation and migration in HUVECs.
Although various physiological and pathological functions of angiogenesis in bone remodeling have been extensively studied, little is known about the detailed mechanisms by which CCL2-activated signaling pathways are involved in the proliferation, migration and vascularization of vascular endothelial cells. AKT is a specific serine/threonine protein kinase downstream of the PI3K signaling pathway that regulates key cellular processes such as glucose metabolism, energy transformation, cell proliferation, cell growth and cell death (41,42). It also increases the secretion of VEGF and the phosphorylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase, which promotes vasodilation and angiogenesis to induce growth factors, blocking apoptosis and increasing the cell survival rate (43). Phosphorylation of AKT promotes cell proliferation, migration and angiogenesis, which can help cells adapt to hypoxia and acidosis (44). In addition, ERK is a member of the MAPK family, and is the key molecule for transferring signals from cell surface receptors to the nucleus (45) and is known for its promotion of proliferation and differentiation (46). The ERK signaling pathway in endothelial cells mediates various cellular processes, such as proliferation, migration, survival and differentiation (47). p-ERK promotes the expression of MMP9, which is one of the Zn2+-dependent endopeptidases downstream of ERK signal transduction (48). MMP9 can degrade denatured collagen and lytic extracellular matrix to facilitate remodeling of the extracellular matrix (49), which is significant in a variety of biological and molecular processes, including tissue repair, wound healing, cell differentiation and metastasis (50). Wnt5a is one of the Wnt family members whose signaling pathways regulate most cell growth and development processes, including cell proliferation, migration and survival (51). Wnt5a is involved in the regulation of angiogenesis by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Upregulation of Wnt5a/b promotes the accumulation of β-catenin and mobilizes the classic Wnt signaling pathway to promote the expression of downstream target genes, such as vascular endothelial cadherin and MMP9, which are implicated in accelerating angiogenesis (52). In the classic Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, the connection of Wnt ligands to frizzled transmembrane receptors and LRP-6 to form protein complexes, ensures cell survival. It is also associated with the promotion of bone formation (53). The present study revealed that CCL2 treatment enhanced the levels of p-PI3K, p-AKT, p-ERK1/2, MMP9, LRP-6, Wnt5a/b and β-catenin in HUVECs. Regrettably, the lack of evaluation for ERK, PI3K, and β-catenin levels in tissue is a limitation of the present study. In summary, these results suggested that CCL2 served a positive regulatory role in the proliferation, migration and angiogenesis of HUVECs by upregulating the PI3K/AKT, MAPK/ERK1/2/MMP9 and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways.
In conclusion, to the best of the authors' knowledge, the present study was the first to demonstrate that CCL2 promoted proliferation, migration and angiogenesis in HUVECs. In addition, the present study investigated the high expression of molecular markers linked to these functions induced by CCL2, including Rock1, Rock2, N-cadherin and c-Myc. Next, using reliable and sufficient methods, it was demonstrated that CCL2 promoted proliferation, migration and angiogenesis by activating the PI3K/AKT, MAPK/ERK1/2/MMP9 and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways. In addition, the SD rat bone defect model confirmed that CCL2 promoted the expression of the angiogenesis-osteogenesis coupling associated protein VEGF in bone defect reconstruction. Due to its mechanism of inducing angiogenesis (Fig. 4), CCL2 may be a novel angiogenesis-osteogenesis coupling agent for bone defect repair and reconstruction.
Supplementary Material
Detailed procedure for establishing bone defects in SD rat models. (A) General view of the external fixation brace used. (B) Anesthesia, skin preparation, disinfection and towel laying for SD rats. (C) An incision of about 2 cm on the left lateral thigh. (D) The skin and fascia were incised layer by layer. The femoral stem was bluntly separated, exposed, and propped open with a small spreader. (E) Using the retractor holes as anchor points, the electric rotor drilled four holes at low speed. The external fixation device was attached to the four screws. (F and G) The bone was cut with a wire saw 3 mm between the two screws in the middle. (H) The external fixation device was adjusted in groups B, C, and D to align the broken end of the femur with the composite brace. Group A left the bone defect area open. (I) The muscle, deep and superficial fascia, and skin were sutured layer by layer. The wound was disinfected with iodophor after suturing. SD, Sprague Dawley rats.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Funding: The present study was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong (grant no. 2020A1515010003), Peaking Plan for the reconstruction of the high-level hospital at Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University (grant no. 20501DFY20190168) and Zhanjiang Science and Technology Bureau (grant no. 200513174547221).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
BW and SL conceived the current study. ZP, HW, XP and HP performed the experiments. ZP, HP, XP, QT and HW analyzed the results. ZP, HP, and QT drafted the manuscript. HW, BW and SL and HP revised the manuscript. HP and ZP confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All animal experiments are approved by the Laboratory Animal Ethics Committee of Guangdong Medical University. (ID Number: GDY1902126; date: 25.05.2019).
Patient consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Freeman F, Burdis R and Kelly DJ: Printing new bones: From print-and-implant devices to bioprinted bone organ precursors. Trends Mol Med. 27:700–711. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Arealis G and Nikolaou VJ: Bone printing: New frontiers in the treatment of bone defects. Injury 46 Suppl. 8:S20–S22. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Tateishi-Yuyama E, Matsubara H, Murohara T, Ikeda U, Shintani S, Masaki H, Amano K, Kishimoto Y, Yoshimoto K, Akashi H, et al: Therapeutic angiogenesis for patients with limb ischaemia by autologous transplantation of bone-marrow cells: A pilot study and a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 360:427–435. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
McLaughlin KI, Milne TJ, Zafar S, Zanicotti DG, Cullinan MP, Seymour GJ and Coates DE: The in vitro effect of VEGF receptor inhibition on primary alveolar osteoblast nodule formation. Aust Dent J. 65:196–204. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Moses MA: The regulation of neovascularization of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors. Stem Cells. 15:180–189. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Holmes K, Roberts OL, Thomas AM and Cross MJ: Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2: Structure, function, intracellular signalling and therapeutic inhibition. Cell Signal. 19:2003–2012. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Risau W: Mechanisms of angiogenesis. Nature. 386:671–674. 1997.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Herzog C, Haun RS, Shah SV and Kaushal GP: Proteolytic processing and inactivation of CCL2/MCP-1 by meprins. Biochem Biophys Rep. 8:146–150. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Whelan DS, Caplice NM and Clover AJP: Mesenchymal stromal cell derived CCL2 is required for accelerated wound healing. Sci Rep. 10(2642)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Tu MM, Abdel-Hafiz HA, Jones RT, Jean A, Hoff KJ, Duex JE, Chauca-Diaz A, Costello JC, Dancik GM, Tamburini BAJ, et al: Inhibition of the CCL2 receptor, CCR2, enhances tumor response to immune checkpoint therapy. Commun Biol. 3(720)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Anada T, Pan CC, Stahl AM, Mori S, Fukuda J, Suzuki O and Yang Y: Vascularized Bone-mimetic hydrogel constructs by 3D bioprinting to promote osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 20(1096)2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Cao Z, Hao Z, Xin M, Yu L, Wang L, Zhang Y, Zhang X and Guo X: Endogenous and exogenous galectin-3 promote the adhesion of tumor cells with low expression of MUC1 to HUVECs through upregulation of N-cadherin and CD44. Lab Invest. 98:1642–1656. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Farrell AS and Sears RC: MYC degradation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 4(a014365)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hu K and Olsen BR: Osteoblast-derived VEGF regulates osteoblast differentiation and bone formation during bone repair. J Clin Invest. 126:509–526. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Loirand GJPr: Rho kinases in health and disease: From basic science to translational research. Pharmacol Rev. 67:1074–1095. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Pai SG, Carneiro BA, Mota JM, Costa R, Leite CA, Barroso-Sousa R, Kaplan JB, Chae YK and Giles FJ: Wnt/beta-catenin pathway: Modulating anticancer immune response. J Hematol Oncol. 10(101)2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Pompura SL and Dominguez-Villar M: The PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in regulatory T-cell development, stability, and function. J Leukoc Biol 2018 (Epub ahead of print). | |
Roskoski R Jr: ERK1/2 MAP kinases: Structure, function, and regulation. Pharmacol Res. 66:105–143. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lu H, Liu Y, Guo J, Wu H, Wang J and Wu G: Biomaterials with antibacterial and osteoinductive properties to repair infected bone defects. Int J Mol Sci. 17(334)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Stahl A and Yang YP: Regenerative approaches for the treatment of large bone defects. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 27:539–547. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhu S, Bennett S, Kuek V, Xiang C, Xu H, Rosen V and Xu J: Endothelial cells produce angiocrine factors to regulate bone and cartilage via versatile mechanisms. Theranostics. 10:5957–5965. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kusumbe AP, Ramasamy SK and Adams RH: Coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis by a specific vessel subtype in bone. Nature. 507:323–328. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhu S, Yao F, Qiu H, Zhang G, Xu H and Xu J: Coupling factors and exosomal packaging microRNAs involved in the regulation of bone remodelling. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 93:469–480. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Street J, Winter D, Wang JH, Wakai A, McGuinness A and Redmond HP: Is human fracture hematoma inherently angiogenic? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 378:224–237. 2000.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Stuttfeld E and Ballmer-Hofer K: Structure and function of VEGF receptors. IUBMB Life. 61:915–922. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Carmeliet P and Jain RK: Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature. 473:298–307. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Simons M, Gordon E and Claesson-Welsh L: Mechanisms and regulation of endothelial VEGF receptor signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 17:611–625. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Nelson WJ and Nusse R: Convergence of Wnt, beta-catenin, and cadherin pathways. Science. 303:1483–1487. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Blaschuk OW: N-cadherin antagonists as oncology therapeutics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 370(20140039)2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sabatini PJ, Zhang M, Silverman-Gavrila R, Bendeck MP and Langille BL: Homotypic and endothelial cell adhesions via N-cadherin determine polarity and regulate migration of vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 103:405–412. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Tomita K, van Bokhoven A, van Leenders GJ, Ruijter ET, Jansen CF, Bussemakers MJ and Schalken JA: Cadherin switching in human prostate cancer progression. Cancer Res. 60:3650–3654. 2000.PubMed/NCBI | |
Heasman SJ and Ridley AJ: Mammalian Rho GTPases: New insights into their functions from in vivo studies. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 9:690–701. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dong M, Yan BP, Liao JK, Lam YY, Yip GW and Yu CM: Rho-kinase inhibition: A novel therapeutic target for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Drug Discov Today. 15:622–629. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lock FE and Hotchin NA: Distinct roles for ROCK1 and ROCK2 in the regulation of keratinocyte differentiation. PLoS One. 4(e8190)2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Wu YJ, Tang Y, Li ZF, Li Z, Zhao Y, Wu ZJ and Su Q: Expression and significance of Rac1, Pak1 and Rock1 in gastric carcinoma. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 10:e33–e39. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lou Z, Billadeau DD, Savoy DN, Schoon RA and Leibson PJ: A role for a RhoA/ROCK/LIM-kinase pathway in the regulation of cytotoxic lymphocytes. J Immunol. 167:5749–5757. 2001.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Noma K, Rikitake Y, Oyama N, Yan G, Alcaide P, Liu PY, Wang H, Ahl D, Sawada N, Okamoto R, et al: ROCK1 mediates leukocyte recruitment and neointima formation following vascular injury. J Clin Invest. 118:1632–1644. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lock FE, Ryan KR, Poulter NS, Parsons M and Hotchin NA: Differential regulation of adhesion complex turnover by ROCK1 and ROCK2. PLoS One. 7(e31423)2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dang CV, O'Donnell KA, Zeller KI, Nguyen T, Osthus RC and Li F: The c-Myc target gene network. Semin Cancer Biol. 16:253–264. 2006.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Baudino TA, McKay C, Pendeville-Samain H, Nilsson JA, Maclean KH, White EL, Davis AC, Ihle JN and Cleveland JL: c-Myc is essential for vasculogenesis and angiogenesis during development and tumor progression. Genes Dev. 16:2530–2543. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Song G, Ouyang G and Bao S: The activation of Akt/PKB signaling pathway and cell survival. J Cell Mol Med. 9:59–71. 2005.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Peiris TH, Ramirez D, Barghouth PG and Oviedo NJ: The Akt signaling pathway is required for tissue maintenance and regeneration in planarians. BMC Dev Biol. 16(7)2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Abeyrathna P and Su Y: The critical role of Akt in cardiovascular function. Vascul Pharmacol. 74:38–48. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Radisavljevic Z: AKT as locus of cancer phenotype. J Cell Biochem. 116:1–5. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhai H, Pan T, Yang H, Wang H and Wang Y: Cadmium induces A549 cell migration and invasion by activating ERK. Exp Ther Med. 18:1793–1799. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gough NR: Focus issue: Recruiting players for a game of ERK. Sci Signal. 4(eg9)2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Liu P and Zhong TP: MAPK/ERK signalling is required for zebrafish cardiac regeneration. Biotechnol Lett. 39:1069–1077. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lin F, Chengyao X, Qingchang L, Qianze D, Enhua W and Yan W: CRKL promotes lung cancer cell invasion through ERK-MMP9 pathway. Mol Carcinog 54 Suppl. 1:E35–E44. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gillard JA, Reed MW, Buttle D, Cross SS and Brown NJ: Matrix metalloproteinase activity and immunohistochemical profile of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 during human dermal wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 12:295–304. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Raeeszadeh-Sarmazdeh M, Do LD and Hritz BG: Metalloproteinases and their inhibitors: Potential for the development of new therapeutics. Cells. 9(1313)2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Shi YN, Zhu N, Liu C, Wu HT, Gui Y, Liao DF and Qin L: Wnt5a and its signaling pathway in angiogenesis. Clin Chim Acta. 471:263–269. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Yao L, Sun B, Zhao X, Zhao X, Gu Q, Dong X, Zheng Y, Sun J, Cheng R, Qi H and An J: Overexpression of Wnt5a promotes angiogenesis in NSCLC. Biomed Res Int. 2014(832562)2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Silvério KG, Davidson KC, James RG, Adams AM, Foster BL, Nociti FH Jr, Somerman MJ and Moon RT: Wnt/β-catenin pathway regulates bone morphogenetic protein (BMP2)-mediated differentiation of dental follicle cells. J Periodontal Res. 47:309–319. 2012.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |