Open Access

Efficacy and safety of iruplinalkib (WX‑0593) on non‑small cell lung cancer with SPECC1L‑ALK fusion: A case report

  • Authors:
    • Quan Zhang
    • Jialin Lv
    • Xi Li
    • Hui Zhang
    • Chenlin Zhu
    • Meng Wang
    • Meimei Si
    • Ying Hu
    • Shucai Zhang
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: December 5, 2023     https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.12341
  • Article Number: 53
  • Copyright : © Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY 4.0].

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The evidence of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor for non‑small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring sperm antigen with calponin homology and coiled‑coil domains 1‑like (SPECC1L)‑ALK fusion was limited. In a previous case report, a Chinese, 44‑year‑old, female non‑smoker with stage IV NSCLC harbouring SPECC1L‑ALK fusion was treated with crizotinib ± bevacizumab for 23 months (from October 2017 to September 2019) and second‑generation ALK inhibitor iruplinalkib for 2.5 months (from October 2019 to January 2020). The present study is an updated case report of subsequent follow‑up of this patient. The patient participated in the phase II INTELLECT study and received iruplinalkib 180 mg once daily with a 7‑day lead‑in phase at 60 mg once daily. Systemic partial response was achieved 1 month later. Intracranial complete response was achieved nearly 5 months after iruplinalkib treatment initiation. Systemic and intracranial responses continued as of cut‑off date (February 2023). The progression‑free survival reached 39.3 months, with right censoring (progression did not occur during follow‑up). Grade 3 hypertriglyceridaemia complicated with grade 2 hypercholesterolaemia recovered after fenofibrate treatment. The other adverse events were not noteworthy. Iruplinalkib demonstrated promising systemic and intracranial efficacy for NSCLC harbouring SPECC1L‑ALK gene, with acceptable and manageable adverse events (for example, grade 3 hypertriglyceridaemia or grade 2 hypercholesterolaemia). Iruplinalkib may be an ideal option for patients with rare ALK fusions.

Introduction

GLOBOCAN 2020 showed lung cancer is one of leading causes of cancer-associated mortalities (1.8 million mortalities worldwide and 710 thousand mortalities in China) (1). The majority of lung cancer is non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), accounting for 80-85% of cases (2). Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion genes, which occur in 3-7% of patients with NSCLC, are important oncogenic drivers (3-5). Echinoderm microtubule associated protein-like 4-ALK was the first reported fusion gene in NSCLC (5) and TRK-fused gene-ALK and kinesin family member 5B-ALK have subsequently been found (6,7).

The first-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) crizotinib is a potent targeted drug for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC (8). Nevertheless, most patients eventually develop progressive disease (PD). The main reason for crizotinib resistance is poor penetration into the central nervous system (9). Second-generation ALK TKIs, such as iruplinalkib (WX-0593), alectinib and brigatinib, can overcome crizotinib resistance (10-14).

In 2018, Dickson et al (15) first reported a rare alteration, sperm antigen with calponin homology and coiled-coil domains 1 like (SPECC1L)-ALK fusion, in epithelioid fibrous histiocytoma. Crizotinib can inhibit the proliferation and survival of SPECC1L-ALK transfected HEK293 cells in vitro (16), indicating ALK TKI may serve as a treatment option for NSCLC with SPECC1L-ALK fusion. However, there is a lack of clinical evidence. A NSCLC case with SPECC1L-ALK fusion, treated with crizotinib ± bevacizumab for 23 months and iruplinalkib for 2.5 months, has been previously reported (17). The patient maintained partial response (PR) as of the reporting date (January 2020). The present study reports subsequent follow-up of this case.

Case report

Demographic and tumour characteristics and the course of treatment with crizotinib have been reported previously (17). In brief, the patient was a female non-smoker aged 44 years. The patient attended Beijing Chest Hospital (Beijing, China) for worsened cough and expectoration in August 2017. Stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with lymph node metastases and pleural effusion but no brain metastasis (cT4N3M1c) was diagnosed according to computed tomography (CT) and lung tissue and retroperitoneal lymph node puncture biopsy. Lung tissue was tested using immunohistochemistry (IHC; Ventana ALK D5F3 CDx Assay, Roche), showing positive ALK expression (17). Further, next-generation sequencing was performed, and SPECC1L-ALK fusion was identified with a mutant allele frequency (MAF) of 28.66% (17). In October 2017, crizotinib treatment (250 mg, orally, twice daily) was initiated. In December 2017, PR was achieved according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) (18). In March 2018, bevacizumab was added to the regimen because tumour size increased and stable disease was reached. In September 2018, the patient developed PD, with progression-free survival (PFS) of nearly 23 months on crizotinib ± bevacizumab. A second biopsy indicated increased ALK expression in IHC and the same SPECC1L-ALK fusion with a lower MAF (1.5%) (17). In October 2019, combination of crizotinib and bevacizumab was discontinued.

The patient participated in the single-arm phase II INTELLECT study of iruplinalkib (10) at Beijing Chest Hospital in October 2019. In the INTELLECT study, patients with ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced NSCLC aged ≥18 years with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (19) of 0-2 were included. The primary endpoint was the independent review committee-assessed objective response rate. At baseline, the patient had lymph node and brain metastases and pleural effusion. The brain metastasis was first found at screening of the INTELLECT study. According to the protocol of the INTELLECT study, oral iruplinalkib 180 mg once daily with a 7-day lead-in phase at 60 mg once daily was given. Tumour was assessed every 6 weeks in the first 24 weeks after iruplinalkib treatment initiation, every 9 weeks after 24 weeks and every 12 weeks after 1 year until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, loss of follow-up, start of other antitumor treatment or death. For this patient, chest and upper abdomen CT and brain magnetic resonance imaging were used. Systemic and intracranial response was evaluated according to RECIST v1.1 and Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) brain metastases criteria (20), respectively. Adverse events were classified and graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03(21).

PR was achieved one month later (November 2019). This patient was followed-up at 4th week but not 6th week. Additionally, the intracranial lesion disappeared and intracranial complete response was achieved in April 2020. As of February 2023, systemic and intracranial exhibited PR and complete response, respectively (Fig. 1). The PFS on iruplinalkib lasted for 39.3 months, with right censoring.

No notable treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) was observed except grade 3 hypertriglyceridaemia complicated with grade 2 hypercholesterolaemia. These TRAEs were first reported in November 2019. Oral fenofibrate 200 mg twice daily was given and triglyceride and cholesterol levels reverted to baseline values (Table I). There was no dose interruption, reduction or discontinuation due to TRAE.

Table I

TRAEs.

Table I

TRAEs.

TRAETime of occurrence after treatment initiation, daysGradeManagementDuration, daysOutcome
Nausea81Observation3Recovered without sequelae
Vomiting81Observation3Recovered without sequelae
Diarrhoea101Observation3Recovered without sequelae
Hypercholesterolaemia102Fenofibrate (200 mg, orally, twice daily)156Recovered without sequelae
Hypertriglyceridaemia103Fenofibrate (200 mg, orally, twice daily)444Recovered without sequelae
Hypertension132Fosinopril (10 mg, orally, once daily) Then switched to nifedipine (30 mg, orally, once daily) and irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide (150 mg/12.5 mg, orally, once daily)Up to cut-off date (February-2023)Not recovered
Hepatic function abnormal201Bicyclol (25 mg, orally, thrice daily)42Recovered without sequelae
Anaemia1161Observation50Recovered without sequelae
Hyperuricaemia1,0281ObservationUp to cut-off date (February-2023)Not recovered

[i] TRAEs were classified and graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03. TRAE, treatment-related adverse event.

Discussion

SPECC1L-ALK fusion is a rare alteration first reported in epithelioid fibrous histiocytoma in 2018(15). In 2020 and 2021, this fusion was identified in NSCLC and glioma, respectively (17,22). The present study reported subsequent follow-up of a patient with NSCLC harbouring SPECC1L-ALK.

Generally, as oncogenic drivers, ALK fusion proteins can result in continuous ALK and downstream signalling pathway activation, inducing tumour proliferation and survival (23). However, the mechanism of SPECC1L-ALK fusion proteins in ALK and downstream signalling pathway activation is unclear. ALK TKIs are recommended targeted drugs for ALK-positive disease (8). In vitro, crizotinib, a first-generation ALK TKI, inhibits growth and survival of SPECC1L-ALK transfected HEK293 cells in a dose-dependent manner (16). Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, there is a lack of studies of novel ALK TKIs for patients with NSCLC and SPECC1L-ALK.

The present case received crizotinib as the first-line treatment and achieved PR. Then, bevacizumab was added due to increased tumour size. First-line PFS reached ~23 months. After PD on crizotinib + bevacizumab, second-generation ALK TKIs may be ideal treatment options (10-14,24-26).

Iruplinalkib is a second-generation ALK TKI developed by Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Jinan, China) with potent preclinical and clinical efficacy and acceptable safety profiles in ALK-positive NSCLC (10,27-29). The phase II INTELLECT study (10) of iruplinalkib showed an objective response rate and a PFS superior or similar to other second-generation ALK TKIs (for example, ceritinib and brigatinib) (11-14,24-26). The present patient had systemic PR and intracranial CR, which continued as of cut-off date (February 2023). The PFS was 39.3 months with right censoring, notably longer than the investigator-assessed median PFS of 14.5 months in the INTELLECT study. In terms of TRAE, most were grade 1 to 2 and not notable in the present patient. Grade 3 hypertriglyceridaemia and grade 2 hypercholesterolaemia occurred during iruplinalkib treatment. Triglyceride and cholesterol levels reverted to baseline after oral fenofibrate 200 mg twice daily was administered. No treatment-related dose interruption, reduction or discontinuation occurred.

In summary, iruplinalkib had promising systemic and intracranial efficacy for NSCLC harbouring SPECC1L-ALK gene, with acceptable and manageable safety profiles. Iruplinalkib may be used for patients with rare ALK fusions. The oncogenic mechanisms of SPECC1L-ALK fusion protein and anti-tumour activity of ALK TKI on tumour with SPECC1L-ALK need further investigation.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. Yunjie Yu for medical writing support and Ms. Fengcai Sun and Ms. Jing Wang for assisting with data collection (all Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Jinan, China).

Funding

Funding: The present study was supported by Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

MW, YH and SZ were responsible for conception and design of the study. QZ, JL, XL, HZ, MS, YH and SZ acquired and interpreted medical images and advised on patient treatment. QZ and CZ analysed and interpreted the data. QZ and JL drafted the manuscript. XL, HZ, CZ, MW, MS, YH and SZ reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The patient provided written informed consent to participate in the INTELLECT study, which was approved by the ethics committee of Beijing Chest Hospital (Beijing, P.R. China; Approval no. 2019-40-01).

Patient consent for publication

The patient provided written informed consent for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data.

Competing interests

CZ, MW and MS are employees of Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Jinan, China). All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

1 

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A and Bray F: Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 71:209–249. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Planchard D, Popat S, Kerr K, Novello S, Smit EF, Faivre-Finn C, Mok TS, Reck M, Van Schil PE, Hellmann MD, et al: Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 29 (Suppl 4):iv192–iv237. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Dearden S, Stevens J, Wu YL and Blowers D: Mutation incidence and coincidence in non small-cell lung cancer: Meta-analyses by ethnicity and histology (mutMap). Ann Oncol. 24:2371–2376. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Koivunen JP, Mermel C, Zejnullahu K, Murphy C, Lifshits E, Holmes AJ, Choi HG, Kim J, Chiang D, Thomas R, et al: EML4-ALK fusion gene and efficacy of an ALK kinase inhibitor in lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 14:4275–4283. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Soda M, Choi YL, Enomoto M, Takada S, Yamashita Y, Ishikawa S, Fujiwara S, Watanabe H, Kurashina K, Hatanaka H, et al: Identification of the transforming EML4-ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer. Nature. 448:561–566. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Rikova K, Guo A, Zeng Q, Possemato A, Yu J, Haack H, Nardone J, Lee K, Reeves C, Li Y, et al: Global survey of phosphotyrosine signaling identifies oncogenic kinases in lung cancer. Cell. 131:1190–1203. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Takeuchi K, Choi YL, Togashi Y, Soda M, Hatano S, Inamura K, Takada S, Ueno T, Yamashita Y, Satoh Y, et al: KIF5B-ALK, a novel fusion oncokinase identified by an immunohistochemistry-based diagnostic system for ALK-positive lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 15:3143–3149. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim DW, Wu YL, Nakagawa K, Mekhail T, Felip E, Cappuzzo F, Paolini J, Usari T, et al: First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 371:2167–2177. 2014.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Zhang S, Anjum R, Squillace R, Nadworny S, Zhou T, Keats J, Ning Y, Wardwell SD, Miller D, Song Y, et al: The potent ALK inhibitor brigatinib (AP26113) overcomes mechanisms of resistance to first- and second-generation ALK inhibitors in preclinical models. Clin Cancer Res. 22:5527–5538. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Shi Y, Chen J, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Zhang S, Zhao J, Liu C, Wang X, et al: Efficacy and safety of iruplinalkib (WX-0593) in ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: A single-arm, multicenter phase II study (INTELLECT). BMC Med. 21(72)2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Yang JCH, Ou SHI, De Petris L, Gadgeel S, Gandhi L, Kim DW, Barlesi F, Govindan R, Dingemans AC, Crino L, et al: Pooled systemic efficacy and safety data from the pivotal phase II studies (NP28673 and NP28761) of alectinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 12:1552–1560. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

12 

Wolf J, Helland Å, Oh IJ, Migliorino MR, Dziadziuszko R, Wrona A, de Castro J, Mazieres J, Griesinger F, Chlistalla M, et al: Final efficacy and safety data, and exploratory molecular profiling from the phase III ALUR study of alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib-pretreated ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. ESMO Open. 7(100333)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Yang JCH, Liu G, Lu S, He J, Burotto M, Vincent S, Yin J, Ma X and Popat S: 319O ALTA-3: A randomized trial of brigatinib (BRG) vs alectinib (ALC) in crizotinib (CRZ)-refractory advanced ALK+ NSCLC. Ann Oncol. 33(S1564)2022.

14 

Gettinger SN, Huber RM, Kim DW, Bazhenova L, Hansen KH, Tiseo M, Langer CJ, Paz-Ares Rodríguez LG, West HL, Reckamp KL, et al: Long-term efficacy and safety of brigatinib in crizotinib-refractory ALK+ NSCLC: Final results of the phase 1/2 and randomized phase 2 (ALTA) trials. JTO Clin Res Rep. 3(100385)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

15 

Dickson BC, Swanson D, Charames GS, Fletcher CD and Hornick JL: Epithelioid fibrous histiocytoma: Molecular characterization of ALK fusion partners in 23 cases. Mod Pathol. 31:753–762. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Chen YL, Chen WL, Cheng YC, Lin MC, Yang SC, Tsai HW, Lin CC, Su WC, Chow NH and Ho CL: Development of a novel ALK rearrangement screening test for non-small cell lung cancers. PLoS One. 16(e0257152)2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

17 

Ma L, Zhang Q, Dong Y, Li H and Wang J: SPECC1L-ALK: A novel gene fusion response to ALK inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 143:97–100. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, et al: New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 45:228–247. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET and Carbone PP: Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern cooperative oncology group. Am J Clin Oncol. 5:649–655. 1982.PubMed/NCBI

20 

Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, Cloughesy TF, Sorensen AG, Galanis E, Degroot J, Wick W, Gilbert MR, Lassman AB, et al: Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: Response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol. 28:1963–1972. 2010.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

21 

National Cancer Institute. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE). 2010. https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm. Accessed October 31, 2023.

22 

Bagchi A, Orr BA, Campagne O, Dhanda S, Nair S, Tran Q, Christensen AM, Gajjar A, Furtado LV, Vasilyeva A, et al: Lorlatinib in a child with ALK-fusion-positive high-grade glioma. N Engl J Med. 385:761–763. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

23 

Chiarle R, Voena C, Ambrogio C, Piva R and Inghirami G: The anaplastic lymphoma kinase in the pathogenesis of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 8:11–23. 2008.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

24 

Shaw AT, Kim TM, Crinò L, Gridelli C, Kiura K, Liu G, Novello S, Bearz A, Gautschi O, Mok T, et al: Ceritinib versus chemotherapy in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer previously given chemotherapy and crizotinib (ASCEND-5): A randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 18:874–886. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

25 

Wu YL, Shi Y, Tan DSW, Xiaoqing L, Cheng Y, Zhou J, An TT, Lu Y, Zhu B, Bai C, et al: Phase 1/2 study of ceritinib in Chinese patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with crizotinib: Results from ASCEND-6. Lung Cancer. 150:240–266. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Yang Y, Zhou J, Zhou J, Feng J, Zhuang W, Chen J, Zhao J, Zhong W, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, et al: Efficacy, safety, and biomarker analysis of ensartinib in crizotinib-resistant, ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: A multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 8:45–53. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Liu X, Zhang L, Wan H, Zhu Z, Jin J, Qin Y, Mao W, Yan K, Fang D, Jiang W, et al: Discovery and preclinical evaluations of WX-0593, a novel ALK inhibitor targeting crizotinib-resistant mutations. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 66(128730)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

28 

Shi Y, Fang J, Hao X, Zhang S, Liu Y, Wang L, Chen J, Hu Y, Hang X, Li J, et al: Safety and activity of WX-0593 (Iruplinalkib) in patients with ALK- or ROS1-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion trial. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 7(25)2022.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Yang Y, Zheng Q, Wang X, Zhao S, Huang W, Jia L, Ma C, Liu S, Zhang Y, Xin Q, et al: Iruplinalkib (WX-0593), a novel ALK/ROS1 inhibitor, overcomes crizotinib resistance in preclinical models for non-small cell lung cancer. Invest New Drugs. 41:254–266. 2023.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar

Related Articles

Journal Cover

February-2024
Volume 27 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-0981
Online ISSN:1792-1015

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Zhang Q, Lv J, Li X, Zhang H, Zhu C, Wang M, Si M, Hu Y and Zhang S: Efficacy and safety of iruplinalkib (WX‑0593) on non‑small cell lung cancer with <em>SPECC1L‑ALK</em> fusion: A case report. Exp Ther Med 27: 53, 2024.
APA
Zhang, Q., Lv, J., Li, X., Zhang, H., Zhu, C., Wang, M. ... Zhang, S. (2024). Efficacy and safety of iruplinalkib (WX‑0593) on non‑small cell lung cancer with <em>SPECC1L‑ALK</em> fusion: A case report. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 27, 53. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.12341
MLA
Zhang, Q., Lv, J., Li, X., Zhang, H., Zhu, C., Wang, M., Si, M., Hu, Y., Zhang, S."Efficacy and safety of iruplinalkib (WX‑0593) on non‑small cell lung cancer with <em>SPECC1L‑ALK</em> fusion: A case report". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 27.2 (2024): 53.
Chicago
Zhang, Q., Lv, J., Li, X., Zhang, H., Zhu, C., Wang, M., Si, M., Hu, Y., Zhang, S."Efficacy and safety of iruplinalkib (WX‑0593) on non‑small cell lung cancer with <em>SPECC1L‑ALK</em> fusion: A case report". Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 27, no. 2 (2024): 53. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2023.12341