Senescence is accelerated through donor cell specificity in cloned pigs
- Authors:
- Published online on: May 18, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2012.1003
- Pages: 383-391
Abstract
Introduction
Despite the successful production of cloned animals, including sheep (1,2), cattle (3–7), goats (8), pigs (9–11) and mice (12–14), somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is still hampered by extremely low efficiency. Early embryonic and fetal loss, stillbirth, and postnatal loss and phenotypic abnormities are commonly reported (12,15–18). The fetal losses and abnormalities may be associated with abnormal placental development (17). Most cloned cows and mice lost prenatally and postnatally are associated with enlarged and dysfunctional placentas (17,19). It was recently proposed that the high rates of developmental failure and abnormalities may be caused by epigenetic alterations (20,21). After SCNT, the donor nucleus requires epigenetic reprogramming to re-enter a totipotent ground state (22), suggesting that the donor nucleus must cease its own program of gene expression and restore the particular program of embryonic expression necessary for normal development. If the reprogramming process is inefficient, embryogenesis will be abnormal (23). Poor epigenetic reprogramming in early-cleavage embryos results in dysregulation of gene expression and abnormal proteins accumulate that can disrupt normal embryonic or fetal development. Indeed, along with the low survival rate, various disease phenotypes have been observed in cloned animals, including circulatory distress, placental edema, hydrallantois, respiratory problems, immune dysfunction and brain malformation (17,18,24). In theory, therefore, partial reprogramming can result in a range of outcomes, including abnormal phenotypes or lethality at various stages of development.
Epigenetic modifications of the genome include changes in genomic methylation, the acetylation state of histones and the remodeling of chromatin. DNA methylation regulates the function of the genome by affecting tissue-specific gene expression, cell differentiation, genomic imprinting, X chromosome inactivation, regulation of chromatin structure, carcinogenesis and aging (25). Recently, Kang et al (26) reported that methylation levels of repeated regions and unique sequences were much higher in cloned morulae and blastocysts than in normal embryos and resembled the methylation levels in the donor cell genome. Interphase nuclei in cloned bovine morulae also contain high methylation levels (27), indicating that reprogramming is deficient in most cloned preimplantation embryos and demethylation seems to be particularly inefficient. The selective demethylation pattern of developmentally important genes was confirmed in SCNT embryos. Unequal methylation was maintained between the inner cell mass and trophectoderm regions, thereby resulting in placental dysfunction in cloned animals (28).
Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism by which related genes are inherited in a parental-specific manner (29). Imprinted genes have roles in prenatal growth, development of the germ line and embryo and behavior, as well as being implicated in human disease (30). The evolution of genomic imprinting must have required oocytes to create and maintain the epigenetic asymmetry of donor cells and the importance of the oocyte cytoplasm can be seen in the parent-of-origin effects on interspecific hybrids of the deer mouse (31). The disruption of imprinting may be due to nuclear to nuclear-cytoplasmic incompatibility between the nucleus of the donor and the cytoplasm of the recipient in these crosses. Cloning inefficiency also contributes to another incompatibility (32): reduced fetal methylation and repression of ovine IGF2R is associated with fetal overgrowth. Preimplantation embryo procedures may thus be vulnerable to epigenetic alterations in imprinted genes. Kato et al (33) has shown that transplantation of imprint-free primordial germ cell nuclei into oocytes results in embryonic lethality (33) and partially abnormal extraembryonic tissues resulting from the inappropriate silencing or activation of imprinted genes.
Cloning by SCNT is a multiple-step procedure and many factors affect cloning efficiency, such as donor cell type and age, the phase of the cell cycle that the donor cell is in and the SCNT procedure itself. Although the SCNT procedure has been improved, developmental defects are still consistently observed in cloned animals. These defects may be related to methodological faults including squeezing to remove nuclear, activation and fusion, which cause the instability of critical reprogramming.
We have generated three cloned pigs that developed wrinkles on their bodies, a phenotype typical of aged animals, at a relatively young age. Here, we report that this phenotype is due to a genetic abnormality of the donor cells rather than to senescence or epigenetic abnormalities during reprogramming.
Materials and methods
Preparation of donor cells
Two types of fetal fibroblasts [named s-pig fetal fibroblasts (sPFFs) and w-pig fetal fibro-blasts (wPFFs)] were isolated from pig fetuses (on Day 30 of gestation) obtained from a slaughterhouse on different days as it has been described before (34). Briefly, collected fetuses were washed 3 times with Ca2+- and Mg2+-free phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The head and internal organs were discarded by scooping them out with two watchmaker’s forceps. After 2 washes with PBS (pH 7.4), the carcass was minced with a surgical blade in a 100π culture dish (Becton-Dickinson, Lincoln Park, NJ). The minced fetal tissues were dissociated in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 0.25% (w/v) trypsin and 1 mM EDTA for 1–2 h. The trypsinized cells were then washed once in PBS by centrifugation at 300 x g for 10 min and subsequently seeded into 100-mm culture dishes. The cells were cultured for 6–8 days in DMEM supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% (v/v) nonessential amino acids and 10 μg/ml penicillin-streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air. After the unattached clumps of cells and explants were removed, the attached cells were further cultured until confluent, subcultured at intervals of 5–7 days by trypsinization and stored after 2 passages in liquid nitrogen at −196°C. The freezing medium consisted of 80% (v/v) DMEM, 10% (v/v) dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma-Aldrich) and 10% (v/v) FBS. Before SCNT, frozen fetal fibroblasts (cultured for 3–5 passages) were thawed for 3–5 days in DMEM supplemented with 0.5% FBS. Individual cells were retrieved from the monolayer by trypsinization for 30 sec and used as donor cells for SCNT.
Production of cloned pigs
The nuclear transfer of donor cells to enucleated porcine oocytes was performed to produce cloned piglets as previously described (35,36). wPFFs produced normal cloned pigs when used as donor nuclei and sPFFs produced the wrinkled cloned pigs. A parentage analysis was performed on the piglets obtained by SCNT and the surrogate recipient females to confirm the identity of the donor cells used for nuclear transfer (35,36). The DNA was extracted from ear punches or tail clippings obtained from each newborn piglet and recipient female. DNA was also extracted from donor cells. Eight porcine DNA microsatellite markers (S0086, S0230, SW902, S0007, S0313, SW61, S0005 and S0164) were used to confirm the genetic identity.
Measurement of telomere length
Telomere length was determined by mean terminal restriction fragment (TRF) length analysis using a Telo TAGGG Telomere Length Assay kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). The genomic DNA (10 μg) isolated from donor cells or ear tissues of cloned pigs was digested with the restriction enzymes HinfI (New England Biolabs, Inc., Beverly, MA) and RsaI (New England Biolabs, Inc.). Undigested or digested genomic DNA samples were fractionated by 0.6% agarose gel electrophoresis at 30 V/cm for 5 h. Gels were denatured, neutralized and transferred to a positively charged nylon membrane (Hybond+; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Oakville, Canada). The membranes were prehybridized in 40 ml of DIG Easy Hyb (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) for 2 h at 42°C and then hybridized in 10 ml of DIG Easy Hyb containing 50 pmol of an end-labeled telomere-specific probe for 16 h at 42°C. Membranes were washed 3 times in 50 ml of 0.5X standard saline citrate (SSC; 1X SSC: 0.15 M NaCl, 0.015 M sodium citrate) for 15 min at room temperature. The signals were visualized by chemiluminescence using a DIG Luminescent Detection kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) and exposed to X-ray film (Hyperfilm; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The signals were scanned and analyzed using Gel Doc software (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) by taking the mean value of the largest and smallest values.
Cell culture and induction of cellular senescence
sPFFs were routinely cultured until replicative senescence as previously described (38). The slowly growing cultures were replenished with fresh DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS every 4 days. Confluent sPFFs were exposed to 700 μM H2O2 in DMEM containing 10% FBS for 5 days as a stressor. After H2O2 stress for 5 days, the sPFFs were rinsed with PBS and incubated in DMEM with 10% FBS.
Galactosidase (Gal) staining in skin tissues
Tissue was collected from the ear skin of cloned pigs, rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen and mounted in OCT compound (Fisher Scientific). Thin sections (10 μm) were cut and mounted onto glass slides. The sections were washed in PBS, fixed for 3–5 min at room temperature in 3% formaldehyde, washed again and incubated at 37°C with fresh senescence associated Gal (SA-Gal) stain solution [1 mg of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoly-D-galactoside (X-Gal)/ml of solution containing 40 mM citric acid/sodium phosphate (pH 6.0), 5 mM potassium ferrocyanide, 5 mM potassium ferricyanide, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2]. Stain signals were evident after 2–4 h and maximal after 12–16 h.
Bisulfite treatment of genomic DNA
All procedures for genomic DNA preparation have been described previously (37). The genomic DNA was digested with HindIII enzyme in a 20-μl reaction volume for 16 h, then denatured with 0.3 N NaOH. Bisulfite modification (38) was initiated by adding 235 μl freshly made 5 M sodium bisulfite (pH 5, Sigma) and 13.5 μl of 10 mM hydroquinone. The reaction mixture was incubated at 55°C for 16 h in the dark. The bisulfite-treated genomic DNA was recovered using a Wizard DNA purification kit (Promega). Desulfonation was performed by adding 0.3 N NaOH and incubating the solution at 37 °C for 30 min. Following precipitation, the DNA was resuspended in 20 μl of distilled water.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, cloning and sequencing
To amplify the satellite region (GenBank™ Z75640) and the PRE-1 sequence (GenBankTM X64127, Y00104 and AJ251914), we performed PCR with ear tissues using 2 μl of the bisulfite-converted genomic DNA as a template. The primer set used for the satellite region was 5′-TTTGTAGAATGTAGTTTTTAGAAG-3′ and 5′-AAAATCT AAACTACCTCTAACTC-3′. The amplification cycle was 45 cycles at 94 °C for 60 sec, 55°C for 60 sec and 72°C for 20 sec and the amplification was finished by incubation at 72°C for 10 min. For amplification of the PRE-1 sequence (41), a primer set of 5′-TTAACRAATCCRACTAAAAACCAT A-3′ and 5′-GTTGGTTTATMTTAGAGTTATAGTAA-3′ was designed. The amplification cycle was 45 cycles at 94°C for 60 sec, 52°C for 60 sec and 72°C for 20 sec, and the amplification was finished with one cycle of 72°C for 10 min. The PCR products after elution were cloned into a TOPO TA cloning vector (Invitrogen Life Technologies). Individual clones were sequenced using an automatic sequencer (ABI PRISM 377; Applied BioSystems).
RNA isolation and semiquantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR)
Tissues from normally fertilized pigs and cloned pigs were collected and minced. Total-RNAs were extracted using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies) and used for the synthesis of a first-strand cDNA using a First-Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) after heating to 60°C for 10 min. The RT-PCR was semiquantitative in the linear portion of the exponential amplification for each gene. The oligonucleotide primers for the imprinted genes are shown in Table I.
Statistical analysis
The experiments were repeated at least 3 times with different sets of nuclear donor cells, ear tissue samples, in vitro fertilized or SCNT blastocysts (a total of 90 blastocysts). The data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance and the protected least significant different test using general linear models in a statistical analysis system (SAS, version 8.1) program. The data are presented as means ± SD. Differences among the treatments were determined to be significant where P-value <0.05.
Results
We produced cloned pigs using two types of fetal fibroblasts (sPFFs and wPFFs, which differed by the day on which the fetuses were obtained) as nuclear donor cells (35). At birth, the cloned pigs were healthy and were of normal weight, and the surface of skin and color appeared normal. At 2 years, however, we observed many wrinkles on the bodies of three cloned pigs the only ones obtained from sPFFs, which did not appear on age-matched normal pigs (Fig. 1B). The face around the nose and forehead was most wrinkled, the neck and ears were easily bent, and a line of wrinkles was present around the neck, ears, tail and legs. In contrast, age-matched normal pigs and normal cloned pigs showed normal smooth skin without wrinkles on these parts of the body (Fig. 1).
One of the important indications of senescence and successful reprogramming in SCNT animals is the telomere length. In our previous report (39), we measured telomere length in 15 cloned piglets, including the three wrinkled piglets and normal cloned pigs, and compared the lengths with those in donor somatic cells. The telomeres were longer in 1-day-old cloned piglets than in the nuclear donor cells and age-matched controls, suggesting that nuclear reprogramming resets the cellular age of donor cells after SCNT. Here, to determine whether the wrinkled phenotype is associated with the status of the genome or the age of the pigs, we compared the telomere lengths of the wrinkled and normal cloned pigs with those of age-matched normal pigs. First, telomere length was measured in adult pigs and newborn piglets to determine the normal reduction in length that occurs with biological and chronological aging. As expected, the 2-year-old adult pigs had shorter telomeres than the 1-day-old newborn piglets and the donor fibroblast cells. The telomeres were longer in the early cloned piglets (mean TRF length = 23.5±1.6 kb) than in donor fetal fibroblasts (mean TRF length = 21.3±1.1 kb; Fig. 2); however, telomere length decreased over time in both normal and wrinkled cloned pigs. Normal cloned pigs >1.5-years-old had a mean telomere length of 19.6±2.3 kb, whereas wrinkled cloned pigs at the same age had shorter telomeres (mean TRF length = 18.7±0.6 kb) (P<0.05). Cloned pigs with or without wrinkles had shorter telomeres than age-matched normal pigs.
Along with telomere length analysis, we examined whether SA-β-gal activity, a biomarker of senescence, was present in our wrinkled cloned pigs. We first confirmed SA-β-gal staining in cells with replicative senescence (RS) or stress-induced premature senescence (SIPS). The SIPS-associated morphology of PFFs was obtained by treating cells with 700 μM H2O2 for 5 days. For RS morphology, the cells were passaged every 7 days for >15 passages. The SIPS and RS cells had larger cell surfaces than the normal and early-passage PFFs (Fig. 3A). After 10 passages, the cell growth declined markedly (data not shown). The senescent pig fibroblasts expressed SA-β-Gal (shown as blue staining), while the early-passage cells did not show SA-β-Gal activity.
To examine whether senescent cells accumulate in vivo after SCNT, we stained ear tissues from the wrinkled and normal cloned pigs, as well as age-matched normal pigs, for SA-β-Gal activity when they were >1.5-years-old. We examined the sections for both the frequency and identity of the positive cells. The hair follicles and associated sebaceous glands and ducts were used as positive controls for SA-β-Gal activity because these structures were stained with consistent frequency and intensity independent of age (Fig. 3Bb and c) (40). In the dermis and epidermis of both the wrinkled and normal cloned pigs, SA-β-Gal staining was sparsely and randomly distributed (Fig. 3Bc–f). The keratinous layers in the most peripheral region of sectioned tissue were also positive in both types of cloned pigs (Fig. 3Bd and e). In contrast, except for hair follicles, no blue precipitation was detected in the age-matched normal pigs (Fig. 3Ba and b).
Expression levels of GAPDH and β-actin change with age in several cell and tissue types (41,42); accordingly, they are not always a proper internal control for mRNA analyses regarding aging. We therefore used the level of 18S rRNA as a reference and the mRNA levels of GAPDH and β-actin as biomarkers for senescence. We first performed semiquantitative RT-PCR with SIPS- and RS-associated cells. Less β-actin mRNA and GAPDH mRNA was observed in the RS and SIPS cells than in the control cells (Fig. 4A). We then determined the mRNA levels of these genes in the wrinkled and normal cloned pigs. Tissues from age-matched normal pigs were used as a control. The normal and wrinkled cloned pigs displayed significantly less β-actin mRNA than the age-matched pigs (Fig. 4B). GAPDH expression was also diminished in the cloned pigs. Although there were individual differences within each group, similar expression patterns were detected within the normal and wrinkled cloned groups.
We examined the methylation status of normal and wrinkled cloned pigs in order to determine whether the reprogramming process occurred during SCNT and whether the methylation pattern could contribute to the phenotypic abnormality. The pig euchromatic PRE-1 repetitive sequence, a subfamily of pig short interspersed element sequences, was chosen as a target for the methylation analysis. We characterized methylation patterns of the PRE-1 sequence using the bisulfite method. Bisulfite causes deamination of unmethylated cytosines to uridine, thereby allowing the discrimination of unmethylated and methylated cytosine residues through sequencing. Sixteen of the 21 CpG sites (78.6±25.8%) in the PRE-1 sequence were methylated in the donor cells (Fig. 5A). Hypomethylation was detected in the three wrinkled cloned pigs, where only 17/24 sites (72.1±15.3%) were methylated. Then we examined the methylation patterns of satellite DNA sequences in pigs. A tiny difference in the methylation status of the satellite region was observed between the donor cells (96.7±5.84%) and wrinkled cloned pigs (92.1±6.9%). Since the donor cells used to produce normal cloned pigs were not available in this study, the methylation status in normal cloned pigs could not be directly compared with the donor cells. However, in normal cloned pigs, methylation was observed in 81.5±17.0% and 88.0±0.84% in both eucromatic PRE-1 repetitive sequences and centromeric satellite DNA. The status of the wrinkled cloned pigs was similar to that of the donor cells (Fig. 5).
Because parent-specific monoallelic expression of imprinted genes is critically important for normal embryo development (43), we determined the allelic pattern of imprinted genes in the wrinkled clones as well as in normal clones. However, few sequences of imprinted genes have been reported in the pig genome database. Therefore, we selected several imprinted genes whose DNA sequences are homologous between human and mouse. For PCR amplification, the primer set for each imprinted gene was designed from the consensus sequence and PCR products were directly sequenced. The PCR conditions, including annealing temperature, size of PCR products, primer sequences and the names of newly selected genes, are shown in Table I. Of the six imprinted genes, COPG2, SNRPN, MEST, GNAS1, UBE3A and IGF2R, all but IGF2R were newly identified in the pig. Using this information, relative transcript levels in the tissues of normal (control) pigs and the normal and wrinkled cloned pigs were estimated by quantitative RT-PCR (P<0.05). Four of the six imprinted genes had considerably reduced transcript levels in the two cloned groups compared to the normal age-matched pigs; however, the mRNA levels of SNRPN and GNAS were within the range of control levels. Although there were individual variations within each group, it appeared that there were lower amounts of Igf2R, Mest and Ube3a transcripts in the wrinkled and normal cloned pigs than in the normal pigs.
Discussion
We used SCNT to derive cloned pigs from two sets of donor cells, sPFFs and wPFFs. Although at birth the cloned pigs appeared normal, the pigs cloned from sPFFs started to show many deep wrinkles in their faces and bodies 2 years after birth. In a previous study, we reported on a cloned pig derived from fetal fibroblasts of an inbred miniature pig that had anal atresia (44). However, we could not determine the cause of this malformation with just one case. Many studies have reported that developmental aberrancies are due to fully unsuccessful reprogramming from somatic cell nuclei to embryonic genomes (20) or to the importance of donor cell selection and its preparation (1,6,14,45–47). Here, we investigated whether the causes of the abnormal skin phenotype (body wrinkles) were derived from a genetic problem caused by donor specificity or from an epigenetic problem during reprogramming. First, we compared telomere length in wrinkled pigs with that of normal pigs and normal (unwrinkled) cloned pigs. In our previous studies, telomere length increased significantly in cloned pigs at birth. However, there was a dramatic shortening of the telomeres in the cloned pigs during growth and the time spent for SCNT (Fig. 2). These data suggest that aging may accelerate more quickly in the wrinkled cloned pigs and that, although there is no visible phenotype at early stages after birth, some error from the nuclear transfer is expressed during growth. Because telomere length is strongly influenced by many genetic and other factors, by itself it can be a poor indicator of aging or cell viability (48–50). To confirm that the wrinkled phenotype is a phenotype of aging, we further examined biomarkers for senescence (aging), including senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal) activity and the expression of GAPDH and β-actin. This specific type of the β-galactosidase enzyme is not expressed in young proliferating fibroblasts (54,55). In our wrinkled cloned pigs and normal cloned pigs, positive SA-β-gal staining was clearly detected in the dermis and the epidermis. The outermost layer and hair follicles of sectioned tissue, known as the keratinous layers, were always positive for SA-β-gal in the age-matched normal pigs (Fig. 3Bb–e, black arrow). GAPDH and β-actin expression were also used as biomarkers for aging. Lowe et al (41) reported that GAPDH expression in skeletal muscles diminishes with age. In addition, Moe et al (42) suggested that GAPDH, β-actin and HPRT, but not 18S rRNA, are differentially expressed at different developmental processes. The decreased mRNA levels of GAPDH and β-actin provide genetic evidence for senescence in our cloned pigs, in addition to the morphological evidence of the abnormal wrinkled phenotype. However, because these markers were observed in both kinds of cloned pigs, the appearance of these senescence markers are not due to abnormal aging that is expressed in wrinkling of the skin but are due to the SCNT procedures and genetic material from donor cells.
It is conceivable that an aberrant sequence of reprogramming events, especially DNA methylation, leads to developmental problems in cloned animals. Previously, Kang et al (26) reported that the methylation status of cloned donor genomes during cleavage was similar to that detected in fertilized counterparts (26). Interestingly, depending on their confirmed sequences, the methylation status of the PRE-1 and satellite DNA sequences was maintained in our wrinkled cloned pigs and showed few changes from those of the donor cells and complete reconstruction of genome status from donor. However, this is in contrast to observations in many previous studies. McKay et al (51) implicated aberrant DNA methylation in the pathogenesis of a number of diseases associated with aging, cancer and diseases of the cardiovascular and neurological systems (51). Accordingly, incomplete epigenetic changes in the donor genome alone might not be sufficient for the wrinkled phenotype of our cloned pigs and other complex factors may be required for this abnormality.
Given that the donor cells had identical methylation patterns, we examined whether the wrinkled phenotype of the cloned pigs was caused by abnormal imprinting. As shown in Fig. 6, the reduction in the mRNA levels of Mest, Igf2R and Ube3a may be associated with the developmental failure or abnormal phenotypes of the resultant cloned animals. In previous reports, mutation of imprinted genes resulted in fetal growth abnormalities in cloned animals and human patients (52,53). Importantly, a substantial correlation was observed between the abnormal expression of any single imprinted gene and the degree of methylation in the promoter regions of the gene. However, the abnormalities observed in most clones result from the cumulative dysregulation of several imprinted genes (54). Consistent with the idea that a single imprinted gene could be insufficient to produce a substantial correlation with an abnormality, we showed that the repression of several imprinted genes does not make a critical contribution to the deep wrinkles in our cloned pigs. In conclusion, we showed that the abnormal wrinkled phenotype in our pigs cloned by SCNT was caused by a genetic abnormality of the donor cells, suggesting that the differentiation status of the donor cell affects the developmental potential of cloned animals. Therefore, although it is also important that donor cells be accurately reprogrammed to early-stage cells, the selection of good-quality donor cells is the ultimate challenge for successful cloning by SCNT.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a grant from the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (no. PJ008323), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.