Detection and genome analysis of human bocavirus 1-4 from hospitalized children with acute lower respiratory tract infection and symptoms of wheezing in Shanghai
- Authors:
- Published online on: September 30, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2013.1512
- Pages: 1415-1420
Abstract
Introduction
Human bocavirus (HBoV) has been detected in both adult and children respiratory tract samples since its discovery in 2005 (1–3). The HBoV genome contains 3 open reading frames (ORFs), encoding 2 non-structural proteins (NS1 and NP1) and 2 viral capsid proteins (VP1 and VP2; VP2 overlaps with VP1, but they have different start codes). HBoV strains with larger than 10% VP1 nucleotide differences (VPD) were distinguished as different genotypes, while VPD between 5% and 10% was typing criteria for different subgenotypes. According to the typing criteria, the HBoV discovered in 2005 was termed HBoV1 (4,5). Subsequently, 3 more genotypes of HBoV (HBoV2-4) were found from human excrement (4–6). HBoV2 can be divided into 2 subgenotypes, HBoV2A and HBoV2B. It has been shown that inter- and intra-genotype recombinations are present among the bocavirus (7).
In humans, the level of anti-HBoV1 antibody increases 2 months after birth and then undergoes a continuous decline before the age of 6 months. A continuous increase in anti-HBoV1 antibody levels can be observed from the age of 6 months to 6 years. By the age of 2, approximately 80% of children have been infected by HBoV1-4 (8–10). Serological detection has revealed that HBoV has a long-term worldwide prevalence among individuals of all ages. Recent studies have indicated that HBoV1 can be cultivated in human respiratory epithelial cells in vitro (11,12). However, no animal infection model has been established thus far; HBoV could not be confirmed as a human pathogen according to the Koch theory (13–15). Some reports have pointed out that HBoV1 is closely related to symptoms of wheezing in children (8,16), while other studies have considered HBoV1 as a passerby or co-infector virus (17,18). Evidence has shown that HBoV1-4 may also be involved in human gastrointestinal tract infections (1,19–21). In our previous study, HBoV1 was found to be closely associated with acute respiratory tract infection in children in Shanghai and most of the infected children had symptoms of wheezing (22). Whether HBoV2-4 is involved in acute respiratory tract infection with symptoms of wheezing is unknown and the genetic evolutionary relation of the epidemic HBoV1-4 strains has not been determined yet.
During the high-occurrence season for acute respiratory tract infections (wintertime, from December 2012 to February 2013), we collected samples of nasopharyngeal secretion (NPS) from hospitalized children with acute lower respiratory tract infection and symptoms of wheezing. We detected the existence of HBoV1-4 in the samples by nested PCR. The DNA sequences of VP1/VP2, NP1 and NS1 in the HBoV-positive samples were further amplified, sequenced and aligned for phylogenetic tree construction. Our results revealed that the HBoV strains detected from the positive samples belonged to one genotype of HBoV1 and it was suggested that all the strains were derived from one common ancestor.
Materials and methods
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China. The 275 NPS samples were collected upon the agreement of the guardians of the infected children.
Materials
A total of 275 NPS samples were collected from children with symptoms of wheezing (within 48 h of hospitalization during the period between December 2012 and February 2013) with acute lower respiratory tract infection. The patients (158 males and 117 females) were aged between 1 month to 8 years; there were 56 cases of bronchitis and 219 cases of pneumonia (including 5 cases of severe pneumonia). All patients had symptoms of coughing and wheezing and a chest radiograph indicated the presence of bronchitis and pneumonia. Of the 275 patients, 136 had a fever (>38°C). Patients displaying symptoms of coughing and wheezing after 48 h of hospitalization or with a past history of asthma were excluded from this study.
HBoV1-4 detection
Viral RNA was extracted according to the instructions provided with the Viral Genomic DNA/RNA Extraction kit [Cat. no. DP 315; Tiangen Biotech (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China]. The general nested PCR primer pairs were designed for HBoV1-4 VP1/VP2 and HBoV1 NP1 (1,4,23) (Table I). The available PCR reaction conditions and programs were used in our study (1,4,6,23–25). The HBoV plasmid was kindly provided by Professor Zhou Rong from Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Alignment analysis of HBoV1 VP1/VP2, NP1 and NS1 DNA sequences
The DNA sequences obtained were sequenced and aligned using online BLAST software. The DNA sequences were analyzed and phylogenetic trees were generated using MEGA5.1.
Detection of other common respiratory tract viruses and pathogens
The direct immune fluorescence technique (Respiratory Panel IFA Kit; Chemion) was used for antigen detection for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), adenovirus (ADV), influenza virus (IFV)-A, IFV-B and parainfluenza virus (PIV)1–3. The fluorescent PCR and bacteria cultivation results of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia trachomatis for the 275 NPS samples were also obtained.
Results
Detection of HBoV1-4
The nested PCR results revealed that 15 of the 275 NPS samples were HBoV1-positive; the detection rate was 5.45%. With the use of common primers for HBoV1-4 VP1/VP2, HBoV1 NP1 and HBoV1 NS1, 15, 15, and 8 positive samples were detected, respectively, by nested PCR. Seven samples with positive signals of VP1/VP2 and NP1 failed to yield nested RT-PCR products using NS1 primers. The clinical information of the 15 HBoV1-positive samples is summarized in Table II.
All the PCR products obtained were sequenced. All the sequences were pooled together with the HBoV1 whole genome (available in GeneBank) for homology analysis using ClustalW (MEGA5.1). The detailed homology information for VP1/VP2, NP1 and NS1 is shown in Figs. 1–3, respectively.
Sequence homology analysis of the HBoV1 VP1/VP2 gene
The 15 HBoV1 strains in our study showed a maximum homology difference of 1.7% with previously discovered strains [strains reported in 2010 and 2011 in Guangzhou: GZ2010-1(JN128956), GZ2010-03(JN128953), GZ2011-01(JN128954) and GZ2011-04(JN128955); strains reported in 2012 in Guangzhou: GZ4785(JN794565) and GZ9081(JN794566); strains reported in 2012 in the US: KU3(JQ411251)]. A minimum difference of 28.1% was shown between the 2009 Australian HBoV2 strains [W298(FJ948860) and W208(EU082214)] and the newly discovered strains. A minimum difference of 30.8% was shown between the 2009 Australian HBoV3(NC_012564) and the new HBoV1 strains. A minimum difference of 30.6% was shown between the 2010 American HBoV4(NC_012729) and the new HBoV1 strains. The maximum difference among the 15 new HBoV1 strains was 1.3%, which indicated that they belonged to the same genotype (Fig. 1).
Sequence homology analysis of the HBoV1 NP1 gene
The homology differences among the newly discovered HBoV strains and previously discovered strains were also calculated based on the NP1 sequences. A maximum difference in homology of 2.3% was observed between the 15 HBoV1 strains and the previously discovered strains (GZ2010-1, GZ2010-03, GZ2011-01, GZ2011-04, GZ4785, GZ9081 and KU3). The minimum difference between W298 and W208 and the newly discovered HBoV1 strains was 27.8%; the minimum difference between the new strains and HBoV3 was 15.2%; the minimum difference between the new strains and HBoV4 was 27.3%; the maximum difference between the 15 new HBoV1 strains was 1. 8%, which indicated that they belonged to the same genotype (Fig. 2).
Sequence homology analysis of the HBoV1 NS1 gene
The homology differences among the newly discovered HBoV strains and the previously discovered strains were also calculated based on the 8 NS1 sequences. A maximum difference in homology of 3.6% was observed between the 8 HBoV1 strains and the previously discovered strains (GZ2010-1, GZ2010-03, GZ2011-01, GZ2011-04, GZ4785, GZ9081 and KU3). A minimum difference of 19.5% was shown among the new strains and W298 and W208; the minimum difference between the new strains and HBoV3 was 9.7%; the minimum difference between the new strains and HBoV4 was 18.7%. The maximum difference between the 8 new HBoV1 strains was 2.1%, which indicated that they belonged to the same genotype (Fig. 3). The 8 HBoV1 strains showed a minimum difference of 10% with HBoV3, which supported the assumption that HBoV3 was derived from the recombination of HBoV1 and HBoV2 (4,25,26).
Phylogenetic tree generation for the HBoV1 gene
The positive PCR products of 15 VP1/VP2 genes, 15 NP1 genes and 8 NS1 genes were pooled for phylogenetic tree construction (Fig. 4). All 3 phylogenetic trees showed that the 15 detected viral strains were scattered on the same branch, which indicated that they belonged to the same HBoV1 genotype.
Detection of other common pathogens
The detection rates for 8 common viruses [RSV, ADV, IFA/B, PIV1-3 and human metapneumovirus (hMPV)] were 44.73, 2.18, 1.45, 1.45 and 3.64%, respectively. The total detection rate was 53.4% (147/275); RSV was the most common pathogen (44.73%) and the detection rate of HBoV1 (5.45%) was second to RSV. The 15 HBoV1-positive samples were co-detected with 6 cases of RSV and 2 cases of hMPV. Thirteen cases of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia trachomatis were identified by qRT-PCR (4.73%); the positive rate of the bacterial culture was 24.36% (67/275); the co-infection rate was 16.0% (44/275); the total detection rate of all the pathogens was 72.0% (198/275).
Discussion
HBoV is a newly discovered Parvoviridae virus. HBoV particles can be detected in respiratory secretions and digestive excrements. A number of scientists have considered that HBoV is closely connected with human respiratory tract infections. However, there is still controversy as to the involvement of HBoV1-4 in children with symptoms of wheezing. The detection of HBoV DNA or particles in the secretions of patients with symptoms of wheezing and the positive transition of serological HBoV antibody were used in this study as alternative methods of examining the infections, although no animal model was available for an HBoV infection study.
We discovered 15 HBoV1-positive samples from the 275 NPS collected from hospitalized children with acute lower respiratory tract infection with symptoms of wheezing; the detection rate was 5.45%, which was second to RSV. This indicates that HBoV1 may be one of the common pathogens responsible for the hospitalization of children with acute lower respiratory tract infection with symptoms of wheezing in Shanghai. As we did not include a control group with no symptoms, no serological and viremia detection were perrormed in our study; the 15 HBoV1 strains may be co-pathogens only or just viruses being carried by the patients. No HBoV2-4 signals were detected, which indicated that HBoV2-4 could not be the pathogens responsible for the hospitalization of children with acute lower respiratory tract infection with symptoms of wheezing in the winter of 2012; this is consistent with the low detection rate of HBoV2-4 in respiratory tract secretions (27–29). Although 7 HBoV1-positive cases displayed symptoms of diarrhea, it could not be confirmed that the digestive tract removed the viral particles, as no excrement samples of the HBoV1-positive cases were collected and detected. Further studies are required to fully investigate this issue.
The homology differences among the newly discovered HBoV strains and the previously discovered strains were calculated based on the VP1/VP2, NP1 and NS1 sequences. All the results revealed that the 15 new HBoV1 strains belonged to the same genotype (Figs. 1–3). All the 15 strains were scattered on the same branch in the 3 phylogenetic trees (Fig. 4). This indicated that the 15 new HBoV1 strains were very likely derived from one common HBoV1 ancestor with pathogenicity, which underwent evolution through inter-genotype recombination.
The discovery of HBoV1-4 indicated that HBoV has a feature of genetic diversities. Being consistent with a recent report (29), the analysis of whole genome sequences in GenBank revealed that the gene recombinations occurred not only among HBoV1-4, but also among the members in the same genotypes. The analysis of different ORFs led to the same conclusion that all the newly discovered HBoV1 strains belonged to the same genotype. Further persistent monitoring is required to determine whether the HBoV1 genotype is closely related with digestive tract infections in children with symptoms of wheezing in Shanghai.
In our study, only HBoV1 was detected by nested PCR from the 275 NPS samples collected from the hospitalized children with symptoms of wheezing in the winter of 2012. The detection rate of HBoV1 was 5.45% (15/275), which was second only to RSV. HBoV1 had a high co-infection rate with other potential pathogens in most of the samples. The 15 newly discovered HBoV1 strains belonged to the same subgroup and thus may be derived from one common ancestor. Our results indicated that HBoV1 may be one of the common pathogens responsible for the hospitalization of children with acute lower respiratory tract infection with symptoms of wheezing in Shanghai.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a grant from the Key Discipline Construction of Public Health in Shanghai (08GWZX0102).
References
Khamrin P, Malasao R, Chaimongkol N, et al: Circulating of human bocavirus 1, 2, 3, and 4 in pediatric patients with acute gastroenteritis in Thailand. Infect Genet and Evol. 12:565–569. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu WK, Chen DH, Liu Q, et al: Detection of human bocavirus from children and adults with acute respiratory tract illness in Guangzhou, southern China. BMC Infect Dis. 11:3452011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Guo L, Wang Y, Zhou H, et al: Differential seroprevalence of human bocavirus species 1–4 in Beijing, China. PLoS One. 7:e396442012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Kapoor A, Simmonds P, Slikas E, et al: Human bocaviruses are highly diverse, dispersed, recombination prone, and prevalent in enteric infections. J Infect Dis. 201:1633–1643. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kapoor A, Slikas E, Simmonds P, et al: A newly identified bocavirus species in human stool. J Infect Dis. 199:196–200. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Arthur JL, Higgins GD, Davidson GP, Givney RC and Ratcliff RM: A novel bocavirus associated with acute gastroenteritis in Australian children. PLoS Pathog. 5:e10003912009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fu X, Wang X, Ni B, et al: Recombination analysis based on the complete genome of bocavirus. Virology J. 8:1822011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kantola K, Hedman L, Arthur J, et al: Seroepidemiology of human bocaviruses 1–4. J Infect Dis. 204:1403–1412. 2011. | |
Endo R, Ishiguro N, Kikuta H, et al: Seroepidemiology of human bocavirus in Hokkaido prefecture, Japan. J Clin Microbiol. 45:3218–3223. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hustedt JW, Christie C, Hustedt MM, Esposito D and Vazquez M: Seroepidemiology of human bocavirus infection in Jamaica. PLoS One. 7:e382062012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Deng X, Yan Z, Luo Y, et al: In vitro modeling of human bocavirus 1 infection of polarized primary human airway epithelia. J Virol. 87:4097–4102. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang Q, Deng X, Yan Z, et al: Establishment of a reverse genetics system for studying human bocavirus in human airway epithelia. PLoS Pathog. 8:e10028992012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rivers TM: Viruses and Koch’s Postulates. J Bacteriol. 33:1–12. 1937. | |
Weissbrich B, Neske F, Schubert J, et al: Frequent detection of bocavirus DNA in German children with respiratory tract infections. BMC Infect Dis. 6:1092006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lusebrink J, Schildgen V, Tillmann RL, et al: Detection of head-to-tail DNA sequences of human bocavirus in clinical samples. PLoS One. 6:e194572011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Deng Y, Gu X, Zhao X, et al: High viral load of human bocavirus correlates with duration of wheezing in children with severe lower respiratory tract infection. PLoS One. 7:e343532012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Longtin J, Gubbay JB, Patel S and Low DE: High prevalence of asymptomatic bocavirus in daycare: is otitis media a confounder? J Infect Dis. 202:16172010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Debiaggi M, Canducci F, Ceresola ER and Clementi M: The role of infections and coinfections with newly identified and emerging respiratory viruses in children. Virol J. 9:2472012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Proenca-Modena J, Martinez M, Amarilla A, et al: Viral load of human bocavirus-1 in stools from children with viral diarrhoea in Paraguay. Epidemiol Infect. Feb 21–2013.(Epub ahead of print). | |
Risku M, Kätkä M, Lappalainen S, Räsänen S and Vesikari T: Human bocavirus types 1, 2 and 3 in acute gastroenteritis of childhood. Acta Paediatr. 101:e405–e410. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Khamrin P, Thongprachum A, Shimizu H, et al: Detection of human bocavirus 1 and 2 from children with acute gastroenteritis in Japan. J Med Virol. 84:901–905. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zeng M, Zhu QR, Wang XH, Yu H and Shen J: Human bocavirus in children with respiratory tract infection in Shanghai: a retrospective study. World J Pediatr. 6:65–70. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mitui MT, Tabib SM, Matsumoto T, et al: Detection of human bocavirus in the cerebrospinal fluid of children with encephalitis. Clin Infect Dis. 54:964–967. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ghietto LM, Cámara A, Zhou Y, et al: High prevalence of human bocavirus 1 in infants with lower acute respiratory tract disease in Argentina, 2007–2009. Braz J Infect Dis. 16:38–44. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Cheng W, Chen J, Xu Z, et al: Phylogenetic and recombination analysis of human bocavirus 2. BMC Infect Dis. 11:502011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chieochansin T, Simmonds P and Poovorawan Y: Determination and analysis of complete coding sequence regions of new discovered human bocavirus types 2 and 3. Arch Virol. 155:2023–2028. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Koseki N, Teramoto S, Kaiho M, et al: Detection of human bocaviruses 1 to 4 from nasopharyngeal swab samples collected from patients with respiratory tract infections. J Clin Microbiol. 50:2118–2121. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu L, He X, Zhang DM, et al: Surveillance and genome analysis of human bocavirus in patients with respiratory infection in Guangzhou, China. PLoS One. 7:e448762012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Abdel-Moneim AS, Kamel MM, Al-Ghamdi AS and Al-Malky MI: Detection of bocavirus in children suffering from acute respiratory tract infections in Saudi Arabia. PLoS One. 8:e555002013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |