Proteomic comparison between abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms

  • Authors:
    • Ken-Ichi Matsumoto
    • Kazumi Satoh
    • Tomoko Maniwa
    • Tetsuya Tanaka
    • Hideki Okunishi
    • Teiji Oda
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 17, 2014     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2014.1627
  • Pages: 1035-1047
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and that of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) is distinct. In this study, to reveal the differences in their biochemical properties, we performed quantitative proteomic analysis of AAAs and TAAs compared with adjacent normal aorta (NA) tissues. The proteomic analysis revealed 176 non-redundant differentially expressed proteins in the AAAs and 189 proteins in the TAAs which were common in at least 5 samples within 7 samples of each. Among the identified proteins, 55 and 68 proteins were unique to the AAAs and TAAs, respectively, whereas 121 proteins were identified in both the AAAs and TAAs. Panther overrepresentation analysis of the unique proteins in the AAAs and TAAs revealed a significant downregulation of the blood coagulation pathway in the AAAs and that of the integrin signaling pathway in the TAAs. On the other hand, Genesis analysis revealed distinct expression patterns of 58 proteins among the 121 proteins. Panther overrepresentation analysis of these 58 proteins revealed that the expression of these proteins in the blood coagulation and the plasminogen activating cascade was decreased in the AAAs, whereas it was increased in the TAAs compared with the NA tissues. On the other hand, the protein expression in the integrin signaling pathway was increased in the AAAs, whereas it was decreased in the TAAs compared with the NA tissues. Thus, the data presented in this study indicate that the proteins that show differential expression patterns in AAAs and TAAs may be involved in the distinct pathogenesis of AAAs and TAAs.

Introduction

An aortic aneurysm (AA) is an enlargement which occurs in the aorta, leading to progressive dilatation and ultimate rupture. According to their anatomical locations, AAs are generally classified as abdominal AAs (AAAs) and thoracic AAs (TAAs), which appear to have distinct pathologies and mechanisms (1). AAAs are much more common (an incidence of at least 3-fold higher) than TAAs (2). The differences in the physical structure and mechanical stress of abdominal and thoracic aortas may also contribute to the disparities in the pathogenesis of AAAs and TAAs (3). Atheroscrelosis is well known to be associated with AAAs, whereas it rarely occurs in patients with TAAs. The increased expression of growth factors, inflammatory cytokines and matrix metalloproteinses (MMPs) induces the migration of macrophages and T cells and the formation of atherosclerotic plaques. MMPs contribute to progressive structural remodeling, particularly elastin and collagen turnover in AAAs. The apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) has also been demonstrated in the media layer of AAA walls (4). These changes are associated with the progressive weakening of the aortic walls in AAAs. Furthermore, several studies have suggested that Th2-type immune responses play a major role in the formation of AAAs (1). The levels of Th-2 cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5 and IL-10 are also significantly increased in AAAs.

On the other hand, genetic contribution to TAAs (approximately 20% of TAAs) is greater than that to AAAs. Connective tissue disorders, such as Marfan syndrome, Loeys-Dietz syndrome and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, influence the pathogenesis of TAAs. Medial degeneration associated with the loss of VSMCs and the destruction of medial elastic fibers is observed much more frequently in patients with TAAs than in patients with AAAs. As regards inflammation and cellular immune responses in TAAs, Th1-type immune responses generally predominate in TAAs (5). The increased expression of the Th1 cytokine, interferon-γ, in TAAs has also been demonstrated.

A number of studies have revealed the proteomic or transcriptional profile associated with the pathological remodeling process in AAAs or TAAs (6,7). However, to the best of our knowledge, a comparison of the proteome spectrum occurring in AAAs and that occurring in TAAs has not been carried out to date.

In a recent study of ours (8), we successfully applied quantitative proteomic analyses using tandem mass spectrometry (MS) with an isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) labeling strategy to reveal differentially expressed proteins in diseased tissues and adjacent normal tissues. The proteomic analyses revealed differentially expressed proteins in calcified AAAs (CAAs) and calcified TAAs (CTAs) in contrast to adjacent normal tissues (8). Consequently, the proteins involved in aneurysm formation and vascular calcification were identified (e.g., type I and type III collagen, matrix Gla protein and α-2-HS-glycoprotein in CAAs; fibrinogen chains and α-2-HS-glycoprotein in CTAs with an increased expression; mimecan in CAAs; and fibulin-5 in CTAs with a decreased expression compared with adjacent normal tissues). Furthermore, proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins in calcific aortic valves (CAVs) compared with those in adjacent normal valvular tissues revealed that α-2-HS-glycoprotein had the greatest increase in expression and that tenascin-X had the greatest decrease in expression in the CAVs (9).

In this study, in order to elucidate the distinct spectrum of molecular alteration leading to the differences in the pathology between AAAs and TAAs, we attempted to reveal differentially expressed proteins in AAAs and TAAs compared with adjacent normal aorta (NA) tissues using the iTRAQ technology (10), followed by nano-liquid chromatography (nano-LC)-matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI)/time-of-flight (TOF/TOF)-tandem MS/MS (8,11). We then compared the differentially expressed proteins in AAAs with those in TAAs.

Patients and methods

Patients and samples

Aortic aneurysm tissues were collected after obtaining approval from the Ethics Committee of Shimane University School of Medicine, Izumo, Japan. All study participants provided informed consent. Aortic aneurysm tissues for quantitative differential expression analysis were obtained at surgery from 7 patients with AAAs [5 males and 2 females; age, 60–87 years; average age (means ± SD), 76.6±10.5 years; size of aneurysms, 45–60 (52.9±5.9) mm] and from 7 patients with TAAs [4 males and 3 females; age, 63–87 years; average age, 78.6±8.3 years; size of aneurysms, 53–72 (61.3±6.3) mm] who underwent aortic aneurysm resection in Shimane University Hospital. Control samples were obtained from relatively NA tissues adjacent to the AAA or TAA tissues. In addition, another 10 AAA and 10 TAA and corresponding adjacent NA tissues for confirmation by western blot analysis were obtained from 10 patients with AAAs [8 males and 2 females; age, 62–89 years; average age, 78.5±7.4 years; size of aneurysms, 40–74 (55.2±10.1) mm] and 10 patients with TAAs [6 males and 4 females; age, 55–80 years; average age, 70.6±7.9 years; size of aneurysms, 45–70 (55.9±7.6) mm]. The sample number, gender, age and size of aneurysms are shown in Table I. Tissue samples were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until protein extraction.

Table I

Samples used for MS analysis and western blot analysis.

Table I

Samples used for MS analysis and western blot analysis.

GenderAgeSize of aneurysm (mm)
Samples used for iTRAQ labeling followed by MS analysis
 AAA patient no.
  AAA1M6050
  AAA2F8058
  AAA3M8746
  AAA4M8160
  AAA5M6445
  AAA6M7855
  AAA7F8656
 TAA patient no.
  TAA1M7862
  TAA2M8772
  TAA3F7860
  TAA4F7563
  TAA5M6353
  TAA6F8755
  TAA7M8264
Samples from other patients used for the determination of TNC expression by western blot analysis
 AAA patient no.
  AAA8M7758
  AAA9M6263
  AAA10M7762
  AAA11M8147
  AAA12M8140
  AAA13M8351
  AAA14F7957
  AAA15F8474
  AAA16M8956
  AAA17M7244
 TAA patient no.
  TAA8F8062
  TAA9M7870
  TAA10M7858
  TAA11M7554
  TAA12F6654
  TAA13F6447
  TAA14M6552
  TAA15M7454
  TAA16F7145
  TAA17M5563

[i] iTRAQ, isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation; MS, mass spectrometry; AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysms; TAA, thoracic aortic aneurysms; TNC, tenascin-C.

Sample preparation

Sample preparation was carried out according to the manual supplied by AB Sciex (Foster City, CA, USA) and according to our previous studies (8,9). Briefly, ~30 mg of each of the AAA or TAA tissues and their adjacent NA tissues as controls were subjected to protein extraction. Following the addition of urea lysis buffer containing 7 M urea, 0.1% Nonidet P-40 (NP-40) and 500 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB) (Sigma, Tokyo, Japan), the sample was sonicated, incubated at 4°C for 1 h, and centrifuged, and then the supernatant was collected. The supernatant was desalted and its buffer was exchanged with 50 mM TEAB using spin concentrators (Corning, Tokyo, Japan). The protein concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

iTRAQ labeling

Labeling with iTRAQ was carried out using iTRAQ™ Reagent from AB Sciex as described in the manual supplied. First, 125 μg of proteins in each of the lysates from the AAA or TAA samples and adjacent NA samples were denatured by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and reduced by [tris-(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP)]. Cysteine alkylation was then carried out by methyl methanethiosulfonate (MMTS). Each sample from the AAA or TAA and adjacent NA tissues was digested by trypsin. Each digest was labeled with a different iTRAQ tag using an iTRAQ Reagent Multiplex kit (AB Sciex). The labeled AAA or TAA and control samples were then combined. The combined samples were fractionated into 6 fractions with a strong cation exchange (SCX) chromatograph (AB Sciex) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each of the fractions was then desalted by a Sep-Pac C18 cartridge (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA).

Nano-LC

Fractionation with the DiNa nano-LC system was performed according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer (KYA Technologies, Tokyo, Japan) and our previous study (11). A total of 171 spots that were mixed directly with a matrix [4 mg/ml α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA); Wako, Osaka, Japan] were placed on an Opti-TOF LC/MALDI 384 target plate (AB Sciex) using a Dina MaP fraction collector (KYA Technologies) per fraction of SCX chromatography.

MS, MS/MS and iTRAQ ratio analysis

MS data were obtained using a Mass Spectrometer 5800 MALDI-TOF/TOF Analyzer (AB Sciex) according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer (AB Sciex) and our previous study (11). A monoisotopic precursor for MS/MS was selected by automatic precursor selection with an interpretation method using the DynamicExit Algorithm (AB Sciex). The MS/MS data were analyzed by ProteinPilot™ 3.0 software using the Paragon protein database search algorithm (AB Sciex), as previously described (12). Each MS/MS spectrum was searched against the database (version 20081216, 20,489 entries) constructed by AB Sciex. The statistical method of iTRAQ analysis was according to ProteinPilot software.

Bioinformatic analysis

The PANTHER system (http://www.pantherdb.org/) was used for classification and pathway analyses of proteins (13). Pathway classification analysis was carried out using a statistical overrepresentation test on PANTHER with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. The UniProt database (http://www.uniprot.org/) was used for annotations of identified proteins. Clustering analysis of differentially expressed proteins was performed using Genesis software provided by the Genesis team at the Institute for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Graz University of Technology (Graz, Austria) (http://genome.tugraz.at/) (14).

Western blot analysis

Cell lysates were extracted with urea lysis buffer as described above. Western blot analysis was performed as described in our previous study (8). A total of 20 μg of proteins in these lysates was electrophoresed through sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), and then the proteins were transferred onto Hybond ECL nitrocellulose membranes (GE Healthcare Japan, Hino, Japan). The membranes were reacted with rabbit polyclonal anti-α-2-HS-glycoprotein antibody (Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Germany), rabbit polyclonal anti-ceruloplasmin antibody (Epitomics, Burlingame, CA, USA) or mouse monoclonal anti-tenascin-C (TNC) antibody [Immuno Biological Laboratories (IBL) Takasaki, Japan]. The proteins on the membranes were then reacted with anti-rabbit IRDye 680-conjugated immunoglobulin (Ig)G or anti-mouse IRDye 800-conjugated IgG, followed by visualization using the infrared imaging system, Odyssey (all from LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). For densitometric analyses of each protein level, the intensity of each band that reacted with the corresponding antibody was measured. Data from triplicate experiments were analyzed for statistical significance by the paired t-test, with p<0.05 considered to indicate a statistically significant difference. Results are expressed as the means ± standard error (SE).

Results

Proteomic analyses of differentially expressed proteins in AAAs or TAAs compared with those in adjacent NA tissues

A total of 7 AAAs and 7 TAAs, as well as adjacent NA tissues were collected from 7 AAA and 7 TAA patients. The identification and quantification of differentially expressed proteins in AAAs or TAAs compared with those in adjacent NA tissues were carried out with iTRAQ labeling coupled with nano-LC-MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS/MS followed by ProteinPilot analysis. Apart from albumin and Ig family members, a total of 656 differentially expressed proteins (AAAs vs. NA tissues) in at least 1 sample within 7 AAAs and 654 differentially expressed proteins (TAAs vs. NA tissues) in at least 1 sample within 7 TAAs were identified. Among these, 483 proteins were detected in both aneurysmal tissues (Fig. 1A). A total of 176 differentially expressed proteins (AAAs vs. NA tissues) which were common in at least 5 samples within 7 AAAs and 189 differentially expressed proteins (TAAs vs. NA tissues) which were common in at least 5 samples within 7 TAAs were identified with an unused ProtScore of ≥2 (99% confidence) based on ProteinPilot statistical analysis. Among these, 121 proteins were detected which were common in both aneurysmal tissues (Fig. 1B). Of note, after having classified the patients based on the diameter of the aneurysms (small group, ≤55 mm; large group, >55 mm) (small diameter group, #AAA1, #AAA3, #AAA5 and #AAA6; large diameter group, #AAA2, #AAA4 and #AAA7 in the case of AAA; small diameter group, #TAA5 and #TAA6; large diameter group, #TAA1, #TAA2, #TAA3, #TAA4 and #TAA7 in the case of TAA), we examined which proteins in the 176 AAA and 189 TAA proteins showed distinct expression patterns in the large diameter group and small diameter group with one-way ANOVA using Genesis software. Consequently, with p<0.01 (small diameter group vs. large diameter group), histone H4 and nucleophosmin were identified in the AAA proteins, whereas α-actinin-4, α-1-acid glycoprotein 1, basement membrane-specific heparan sulfate proteoglycan core protein, caldesmon, calreticulin, filamin-A, lamin-A/C, lipoma-preferred partner, NADH-cytochrome b5 reductase 3, membrane primary amine oxidase, myosin-9, myosin-10, myosin-11, myosin light polypeptide 6, polymerase I and transcript release factor, transgelin, tropomyosin β chain, versican core protein and vimentin were identified in the TAA proteins.

Furthermore, since most biochemical methods tend to have technical variation, we considered an additional cut-off value (1.3-fold change in expression; upregulated proteins, ≥1.3-fold change in expression; downregulated proteins, <0.77-fold change in expression, AA tissues vs. NA tissues) for iTRAQ ratios for the selection of proteins with differential expression levels, as previously described (9,15,16). As a result, 28 and 18 proteins with a significantly increased expression (≥1.3-fold, AA tissues vs. NA tissues) and 12 and 143 proteins with a significantly decreased expression (<0.77-fold, AA tissues vs. NA tissues) were identified in the AAAs and TAAs, respectively (Fig. 1C). In Tables II-V, proteins with increased (≥1.3-fold, AA tissues vs. NA tissues) and decreased expression (<0.77-fold, AA tissues vs. NA tissues) in the AAAs and TTAs compared with the adjacent NA tissues are listed in order of iTRAQ ratios.

Table II

Proteins with increased expression in AAA tissues compared with adjacent NA tissues.

Table II

Proteins with increased expression in AAA tissues compared with adjacent NA tissues.

Unused ProtScorea% CoveragebPeptidesc (95%) ReproducibilitydUniProt no.Gene symbolProtein nameiTRAQ ratio average ± SEMolecular function
52.170.0535P17661DESDesmin2.80±0.88Cytoskeletal protein
15.068.495P21291CSRP1Cysteine and glycine-rich protein 11.97±0.78Cytoskeletal protein
96.357.3965P02461COL3A1Collagen α-1(III) chain1.96±0.91Extracellular matrix
47.370.8356P07951TPM2Tropomyosin β chain1.87±0.85Cytoskeletal protein
42.490.1306Q01995TAGLNTransgelin1.75±0.71Cytoskeletal protein
122.373.01097P08123COL1A2Collagen α-2(I) chain1.72±0.56Extracellular matrix
150.454.41325P35749MYH11Myosin-111.67±0.37Cytoskeletal protein
136.571.21517P02452COL1A1Collagen α-1(I) chain1.65±0.55Extracellular matrix
31.68.1155P13611VCANVersican core protein1.64±0.67Extracellular matrix
4.027.825P60903S100A10Protein S100-A101.62±0.45Calcium-binding protein
18.068.997P62805HIST1H4AHistone H41.60±0.32Nucleic acid binding
31.841.5176Q05682CALD1Caldesmon1.53±0.39Cytoskeletal protein
15.450.885P51911CNN1Calponin-11.49±0.47Cytoskeletal protein
73.775.3607P08670VIMVimentin1.47±0.38Cytoskeletal protein
39.968.2287P21810BGNBiglycan1.45±0.53Extracellular matrix
4.018.425P06748NPM1Nucleophosmin1.43±0.26Chaperone
22.726.8125P08107HSPA1AHeat shock 70 kDa protein 11.43±0.42Chaperone
18.026.895Q5VTE0EEF1AL3Putative elongation factor 1-α-like 31.43±0.24Putative protein biosynthesis
13.061.876P62937PPIAPeptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase A1.43±0.40Isomerase
4.114.625O14791APOL1Apolipoprotein L11.40±0.61Transporter
7.723.445Q14847LASP1LIM and SH3 domain protein 11.40±0.49Cytoskeletal protein
8.488.646P62328TMSB4XThymosin β-41.37±0.36Cytoskeletal protein
10.134.655P00387CYB5R3NADH-cytochrome b5 reductase 31.36±0.44Oxidoreductase
23.729.1215P08572COL4A2Collagen α-2(IV) chain1.33±0.31Extracellular matrix
14.840.385Q07507DPTDermatopontin1.33±0.37Extracellular matrix
20.021.5146Q16853AOC3Membrane primary amine oxidase1.33±0.27Oxidoreductase
20.486.8186P60660MYL6Myosin light polypeptide 61.31±0.31Cytoskeletal protein
5.46.835P27824CANXCalnexin1.31±0.36Calcium-binding protein

a A score of protein confidence (ProtScore) for a detected protein that is calculated from the peptide confidence from spectra that has not yet been ‘used’ by higher scoring proteins in the experiments.

b The percentage of matching amino acids from the identified peptides.

c The number of distinct peptides with at least 95% confidence in the experiments.

d Reproducibility in 7 experiments.

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn6-ijmm-33-04-1035'] } AAAs, abdominal aortic aneurysms; NA, normal aorta; iTRAQ, isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation; SE, standard error.

Table V

Proteins with decreased expression in TAA tissues compared with adjacent NA tissues.

Table V

Proteins with decreased expression in TAA tissues compared with adjacent NA tissues.

Unused ProtScorea% CoveragebPeptidesc (95%) ReproducibilitydUniProt no.Gene symbolProtein nameiTRAQ ratio average ± SEMolecular function
64.315.3447P13611VCANVersican core protein0.29±0.09Extracellular matrix
14.972.786P50238CRIP1Cysteine-rich protein 10.30±0.06Zinc-binding protein
7.452.345Q16527CSRP2Cysteine and glycine-rich protein 20.32±0.06Zinc-binding protein
3.413.025P43121MCAMCell surface glycoprotein MUC180.34±0.05Cell adhesion
33.576.1297P55083MFAP4 Microfibril-associated glycoprotein 40.35±0.09Extracellular matrix
34.663.8177P10915HAPLN1Hyaluronan and proteoglycan link protein 10.37±0.06Extracellular matrix
24.966.3146P24844MYL9Myosin regulatory light polypeptide 90.37±0.12Cytoskeletal protein
14.931.096Q13642FHL1Four and a half LIM domains protein 10.37±0.05Transcription factor
12.327.776Q06828FMODFibromodulin0.38±0.09Extracellular matrix
10.537.075P60981DSTNDestrin0.38±0.03Cytoskeletal protein
102.598.61267P68871HBBHemoglobin subunit β0.39±0.07Oxygen transport
5.424.435O14558HSPB6Heat shock protein β-60.39±0.05Chaperone
13.861.787P21291CSRP1Cysteine and glycine-rich protein 10.40±0.10Zinc-binding protein
9.618.555Q8WUP2FBLIM1Filamin-binding LIM protein 10.40±0.08Cytoskeletal protein
16.360.186P52943CRIP2Cysteine-rich protein 20.40±0.09Zinc-binding protein
42.795.0317Q01995TAGLNTransgelin0.41±0.12Cytoskeletal protein
6.345.637P06703S100A6Protein S100-A60.41±0.07Calcium-binding protein
10.066.955P00441SOD1Superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn]0.41±0.12Oxidoreductase
82.479.2647P08670VIMVimentin0.42±0.11Cytoskeletal protein
135.453.8837P35580MYH10Myosin-100.42±0.09Cytoskeletal protein
5.436.446P61981YWHAG14-3-3 protein γ0.42±0.08Adaptor protein
11.533.657O43294TGFB1I1Transforming growth factor β-1-induced transcript 1 protein0.43±0.09Adaptor protein
19.625.8127P39060COL18A1Collagen α-1(XVIII) chain0.43±0.08Extracellular matrix
24.311.5137P16112ACANAggrecan core protein0.43±0.06Extracellular matrix
27.731.3157Q16853AOC3Membrane primary amine oxidase0.44±0.06Oxidoreductase
23.591.4157P60660MYL6Myosin light polypeptide 60.44±0.12Cytoskeletal protein
53.774.7287P07951TPM2Tropomyosin β chain0.44±0.14Cytoskeletal protein
55.978.9957P69905HBA1Hemoglobin subunit α0.44±0.07Oxygen transport
76.185.1765P62736ACTA2Actin, aortic smooth muscle0.45±0.16Cytoskeletal protein
8.526.447Q6NZI2PTRFPolymerase I and transcript release factor0.45±0.09Transcription factor

a A score of protein confidence (ProtScore) for a detected protein that is calculated from the peptide confidence from spectra that has not yet been ‘used’ by higher scoring proteins in the experiments.

b The percentage of matching amino acids from the identified peptides.

c The number of distinct peptides with at least 95% confidence in the experiments.

d Reproducibility in 7 experiments.

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn21-ijmm-33-04-1035'] } TAAs, thoracic aortic aneurysms; NA, normal aorta; iTRAQ, isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation; SE, standard error.

In order to confirm the accuracy of the quantitative results for the differentially expressed proteins identified, some proteins with an iTRAQ quantitative ratio were quantified again by western blot analysis (Fig. 2). The iTRAQ ratio of α-2-HS-glycoprotein in AAAs compared with that in adjacent NA tissues in patient #AAA3 was 0.79-fold. On the other hand, the ratio of α-2-HS-glycoprotein in the AAAs compared with that in NA tissue (1.0) was determined by band intensity of western blot analysis and it was 0.55-fold (Fig. 2A). Similarly, the iTRAQ ratio of ceruloplasmin in TAAs compared with that in adjacent NA tissues in patient #TAA4 was 2.25-fold, whereas the ratio of ceruloplasmin based on western blot analysis was 1.98-fold (Fig. 2B). These results indicate that iTRAQ ratios are almost consistent with the quantitative results by western blot analysis.

Analysis of proteins unique to AAAs and TAAs

To disclose distinct molecular alterations that occurred in AAAs and TAAs, the 55 and 68 proteins unique to AAAs and TAAs among the 176 AAA proteins and 189 TAA proteins found in common in at least 5 samples within each of the 7 samples, respectively, were selected (Fig. 1B). On the other hand, 121 differentially expressed proteins were identified which were common in the AAA and TAA samples (Fig. 1B).

We investigated the possible biochemical pathway for the 55 and 68 proteins unique to AAAs and TAAs by using the PANTHER pathway system (Fig. 3). As a result, we found the possible involvement of the blood coagulation pathway (statistical overrepresentation test in PANTHER, p=1.53E-06) in AAAs. This pathway included coagulation factor XIII A chain (iTRAQ ratio, 1.26, AAAs vs. NA tissues), kininogen-1 (0.88), vitamin K-dependent protein S (0.85), antithrombin-III (0.83), heparin cofactor 2 (0.80) and prothrombin (0.71); the majority of these proteins were downregulated in the AAA tissues compared with the adjacent NA tissues. On the other hand, in the TAAs, we observed the downregulation of the integrin signaling pathway (statistical overrepresentation test in PANTHER, p=6.17E-06), including laminin subunit γ-1 (iTRAQ ratio, 0.65, TAAs vs. NA tissues), integrin-linked protein kinase (ILK) (0.62), caveolin-1 (0.58), type IV collagen α1 chain (0.56), laminin subunit β2 (0.56), laminin subunit α5 (0.54), Ras-related protein R-Ras (0.52), α-actinin-4 (0.51), transforming growth factor β-1-induced transcript 1 protein (0.43) in the TAA tissues compared with the adjacent NA tissues. Furthermore, in order to determine the functional distribution of these unique proteins in the AAAs and TAAs, we sorted the proteins with the PANTHER protein class system (Fig. 4). In the AAAs, the 55 unique proteins were significantly classified into defense/immunity protein (statistical overrepresentation test in PANTHER, p=5.55E-05), including complement component (p=4.67E-10), transfer/carrier protein (p=4.83E-06), including apolipoprotein (p=2.26E-11), enzyme modulator including protease inhibitor (p=7.56E-07) and serine protease inhibitor (p=6.10E-06) and protease, including metalloprotease (p=0.0052) and serine protease (p=0.0053); the majority of these proteins were downregulated in the AAA tissues compared with the adjacent NA tissues. On the other hand, in the TAAs, the 68 proteins were significantly classified into cytoskeletal protein (p=1.21E-08), including actin family cytoskeletal protein (p=1.29E-14) and non-motor actin binding protein (p=4.95E-03), cell adhesion molecule (p=6.37E-04), structural protein (p=1.63E-07), extracellular matrix (ECM) protein (p=7.56E-05) and calcium-binding protein (p=7.31E-04); the majority of these proteins were downregulated in the TAAs compared with the adjacent NA tissues.

Analysis of 121 differentially expressed proteins identified which were common in AAAs and TAAs

We performed hierarchical clustering analysis with Genesis software using the expression patterns of the 121 differentially expressed proteins identified which were common in at least each of 5 samples within the 7 AAAs and 7 TAAs compared with the corresponding adjacent NA tissues. Among the 121 proteins, we examined proteins that showed statistically distinct expression patterns between the AAAs and TAAs by one-way ANOVA using Genesis software. Consequently, 58 proteins, including plasminogen (AAAs vs. TAAs, p=5.21E-04), moesin (p=5.24E-04), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (p=0.0014), α-2-macroglobulin (p=0.0029), apolipoprotein B-100 (p=0.0032), basement membrane-specific heparan sulfate proteoglycan core protein (p=0.0041) and TNC (p=0.0044) showed significantly distinct expression patterns between the AAAs and TAAs. Furthermore, the PANTHER overrepresentation test revealed that some of the 58 proteins were significantly involved in pathways, such as plasminogen activation cascade [p=4.11E-5; fibrinogen α chain (iTRAQ ratio, 0.45, AAAs vs. NA tissues; iTRAQ ratio, 3.24, TAAs vs. NA tissues), fibrinogen β chain (0.43:4.86), fibrinogen γ chain (0.44:3.89), plasminogen (0.76:2.29)], blood coagulation [p=1.13E-04; α-2-macroglobulin (0.80:1.64), fibrinogen α chain (0.45:3.24), fibrinogen β chain (0.43:4.86), fibrinogen γ chain (0.44:3.89), plasminogen (0.76:2.29)], and integrin signaling pathway [p=3.80E-04; type XIV collagen α1 chain (1.25:0.48), type XVIII collagen α1 chain (1.26:0.43), filamin-A (1.19:0.48), type IV collagen α2 chain (1.33:0.52), type XII collagen α1 chain (1.15:0.63), vinculin (1.03:0.50), type VI collagen α1 chain (1.00:0.69)]. In general, protein expression in the blood coagulation and the plasminogen activation cascade was decreased in the AAAs, whereas it was increased in the TAAs compared with the adjacent NA tissues. On the other hand, protein expression in the integrin signaling pathway was increased in the AAAs, whereas it was decreased in the TAAs compared with the adjacent NA tissues. The dendrogam based on the expression patterns of the 58 proteins demonstrated similar expression patterns of each protein within the AAA or TAA patient groups, while there were distinct expression patterns of each protein between the AAA and TAA patient groups (Fig. 5).

Verification of distinct expression patterns of TNC between AAAs and TAAs with other aneurysmal samples by western blot analysis

The matricellular protein, TNC, is upregulated under pathological conditions, such as myocardial infarction, cardiac fibrosis, atherosclerosis and aneurysms, often being associated with tissue injury and inflammation (17). It has been reported that TNC is upregulated in both AAAs (18,19) and TAAs (20,21). However, in the present study, as mentioned above, TNC belonged to the 58 proteins which showed distinct expression patterns in the AAAs and TAAs among the 121 proteins; namely, its iTRAQ ratio was 0.93 in the AAAs (AAAs vs. NA tissues), whereas the iTRAQ ratio was 1.86 in the TAAs (TAAs vs. NA tissues). Thus, the expression patterns of TNC in the AAA and TAA tissues were verified with another 10 AAA and 10 TAA tissues by western blot analysis compared with those in corresponding adjacent NA tissues (Fig. 6). Consequently, we confirmed an increased level of TNC in the TAA tissues compared with the adjacent NA tissues (Fig. 6B); however, the expression level of TNC in the AAAs did not differ significantly from that in the adjacent NA tissues (Fig. 6A).

Discussion

Different features in embryonic origin, vessel structure and stiffness, immune response, the intercellular signaling pathway and proteolytic activity between the abdominal aorta and thoracic aorta contribute to the distinct symptom onsets and pathological states in AAAs and TAAs (3,22). The identification of the broad range of proteomic differences between AAAs and TAAs would be valuable for their diagnosis and therapy. In this study, using an approach with iTRAQ labeling followed by nano-LC-MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS/MS analysis, proteins with differential expression in AAAs and TAAs and their adjacent NA tissues were examined. Proteomic profiles of AAAs and TAAs were then compared. Consequently, as distinct pathways activated between the AAAs and TAAs, we revealed the downregulation of the blood coagulation and plasminogen activation cascade in the AAAs and their upregulation in the TAAs, as well as the downregulation of the integrin signaling pathway in the TAAs and its upregulation in AAAs.

It is of interest that the proteins with the greatest decrease and increase in expression in the AAAs (Table III) and TAAs (Table IV), respectively, were fibrinogen β, γ and α chains. A number of studies have been carried out on the association of plasma D-dimer (fibrinogen degradation product) with the presence of AAAs (2325) and TAAs (26). However, to the best of our knowledge, there are only a few studies available on the finding of increased levels of fibrinogens in aortic aneurymal tissues (26,27). The increased amounts of fibrinogens in TAAs are consistent with our previous results for the expression levels of fibrinogens in CTAs compared with those in adjacent NA tissues (8). However, the iTRAQ ratios of fibrinogen β, γ and α chains in CAAs compared with those in adjacent NA tissues were 1.39, 1.27 and 1.17, respectively, indicating relatively increased levels of fibrinogens in CAA tissues (8). The reason for different levels of fibrinogens in AAA and CAA tissues compared with the levels in corresponding adjacent NA tissues remains to be determined. The different levels may be due to the distinct characteristics of AAAs and CATs. Further analyses are required.

Table III

Proteins with decreased expression in AAA tissues compared with adjacent NA tissues.

Table III

Proteins with decreased expression in AAA tissues compared with adjacent NA tissues.

Unused ProtScorea% CoveragebPeptidesc (95%) ReproducibilitydUniProt no.Gene symbolProtein nameiTRAQ ratio average ± SEMolecular function
138.889.61667P02675FGBFibrinogen β chain0.43±0.11Extracellular matrix
108.287.4987P02679FGGFibrinogen γ chain0.44±0.11Extracellular matrix
136.761.21067P02671FGAFibrinogen α chain0.45±0.11Extracellular matrix
8.313.235Q86UX7FERMT3Fermitin family homolog 30.63±0.06Cell adhesion
4.611.826P05155SERPING1Plasma protease C1 inhibitor0.71±0.14Serine protease inhibitor
35.649.2187P00734F2Prothrombin0.71±0.18Serine protease
6.06.036P01031C5Complement C50.71±0.22Complement component
8.023.647Q96PD5PGLYRP2 N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine amidase0.73±0.13Hydrolase
9.59.455P13671C6Complement component C60.75±0.21Complement component
15.727.097P02765AHSG α-2-HS-glycoprotein0.76±0.11Extracellular matrix
35.642.8197P00747PLGPlasminogen0.76±0.17Serine protease
16.027.287P04196HRGHistidine-rich glycoprotein0.77±0.12Adaptor protein

a A score of protein confidence (ProtScore) for a detected protein that is calculated from the peptide confidence from spectra that has not yet been ‘used’ by higher scoring proteins in the experiments.

b The percentage of matching amino acids from the identified peptides.

c The number of distinct peptides with at least 95% confidence in the experiments.

d Reproducibility in 7 experiments.

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn11-ijmm-33-04-1035'] } AAAs, abdominal aortic aneurysms; NA, normal aorta; iTRAQ, isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation; SE, standard error.

Table IV

Proteins with increased expression in TAA tissues compared with adjacent NA tissues.

Table IV

Proteins with increased expression in TAA tissues compared with adjacent NA tissues.

Unused ProtScorea% CoveragebPeptidesc (95%) ReproducibilitydUniProt no.Gene symbolProtein nameiTRAQ ratio average ± SEMolecular function
126.784.71707P02675FGBFibrinogen β chain4.86±1.56Extracellular matrix
89.983.7977P02679FGGFibrinogen γ chain3.89±1.07Extracellular matrix
111.167.81007P02671FGAFibrinogen α chain3.24±0.94Extracellular matrix
255.240.61305P04114APOBApolipoprotein B-1002.44±0.24Transporter
45.848.3235P00747PLGPlasminogen2.29±0.27Serine protease
34.720.2165P24821TNCTenascin1.86±0.21Extracellular matrix
51.884.9317P02649APOEApolipoprotein E1.85±0.40Transporter
56.985.4326P02647APOA1Apolipoprotein A-I1.83±0.27Transporter
47.258.8337P04004VTNVitronectin1.80±0.45Extracellular matrix
58.533.4295P01023A2M α-2-macroglobulin1.64±0.14Signaling molecule
42.770.2315P00738HPHaptoglobin1.57±0.31Hemoglobin binding
32.526.3225P07996THBS1 Thrombospondin-11.56±0.14Extracellular matrix
56.543.3305P00450CPCeruloplasmin1.46±0.25Transporter
10.022.356P07339CTSDCathepsin D1.44±0.22Aspartic protease
16.230.676P07585DCNDecorin1.42±0.45Extracellular matrix
19.833.1107P04196HRGHistidine-rich glycoprotein1.38±0.38Adaptor protein
15.867.495P02766TTRTransthyretin1.35±0.23Transporter
35.057.4215P02749APOHβ-2-glycoprotein 11.34±0.58Phospholipid binding

a A score of protein confidence (ProtScore) for a detected protein that is calculated from the peptide confidence from spectra that has not yet been ‘used’ by higher scoring proteins in the experiments.

b The percentage of matching amino acids from the identified peptides.

c The number of distinct peptides with at least 95% confidence in the experiments.

d Reproducibility in 7 experiments.

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn16-ijmm-33-04-1035'] } TAAs, thoracic aortic aneurysms; NA, normal aorta; iTRAQ, isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation; SE, standard error.

In the present study, we observed some proteins in the integrin signaling pathway with a decreased expression in TAAs, but with an increased expression in AAAs compared with corresponding adjacent NA tissues. These results coincide with the results of our previous study, showing the decreased expression of the integrin signaling pathway in CTAs and the increased expression of the pathway in CAAs (8). Intriguingly, Shen et al (28) demonstrated that mice with targeted deletion of ILK, one of the crucial molecules in the integrin signaling pathway, in the VSMCs generate TAAs and the marked disruption of the structural organization in the arterial tunica media by aberrant integrin signaling, including abnormal localizacion of myocardin-related transcription factors (MRTFs), a reduced amount of F-actin and impaired RhoA activation in ILK-deficient VSMCs. On the other hand, the increased expression of integrin αv was actually observed at the site of AAA rupture (29). Zheng et al (30) showed that osteopontin induces autophagy through the activation of the integrin/CD44 and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways in VSMCs, which is associated with the incidence of AAAs.

Didangelos et al (7) reported results of proteomic analysis of the ECM of human AAAs compared with that of control samples from patients without connective tissue disorders. They identified 80 ECM proteins with extraction using 0.5 M NaCl extraction buffer and 117 ECM proteins with the extraction using 4 M guanidine buffer, with the difference in relative protein abundance between AAAs and controls being determined using spectral counts. Thirty-four proteins among the 80 proteins and 21 proteins among the 117 proteins were found to be common in the 176 differentially expressed proteins in AAAs identified in the present study. Biglycan and type I collagen α1 and α2 chains in AAA tissues were upregulated by >1.3-fold, whereas versican was downregulated by <0.77-fold in both their experiments and the present study (AAA samples vs. control samples).

Recently, we reported that the kallistatin level in pre-surgical sera of both AAA and TAA patients and the α-2-macroglobulin level in pre-surgical sera of TAA patients were increased compared with those in the post-surgical sera of the corresponding patients (31). In the present study, kallistatin was not identified as a differentially expressed protein in both aneurysmal tissues, whereas α-2-macroglobulin expression was increased in the TAAs (1.64-fold) compared with that in adjacent normal tissues. Therefore, these results demonstrated that α-2-macroglobulin was increased not only in the serum of patients with TAAs but also in TAA tissues. α-2-macroglobulin plays a role in the inhibition and clearance of active proteases, including all of the 4 major classes of endopeptidases in tissue fluids (32). Since MMP activity is high in AAs and positively correlates with aneurysmal size (33), the upregulation of endogenous MMP inhibitors, such as α-2-macroglobulin in TAAs may be for the prevention of further TAA progression.

In the present study, we demonstrate the increased level of TNC in TAAs, but not in AAAs compared with adjacent normal tissues. The finding of the increased expression of TNC in TAAs is consistent with the results of previous studies (20,21). However, our results regarding the expression of TNC in AAAs are not consistent with those of previous studies, showing the upregulation of TNC in AAA tissues (18,19,34). The reason for this inconsistency is not known. However, Kimura et al (19) reported that the expression level of TNC did not correlate with the AAA diameter in human AAAs. This suggests that AAA tissues have heterogeneity in pathology.

In conclusion, our data reveal opposite expression patterns of proteins in the blood coagulation and plasminogen activation cascade and integrin signaling pathway between AAAs and TAAs. These distinct alterations of their proteomes may lead to the difference in the pathology between AAAs and TAAs.

Acknowledgements

We thank Yasuko Sonoyama for sample collections. This study was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (22590063 to K.M.) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan.

References

1 

Guo DC, Papke CL, He R and Milewicz DM: Pathogenesis of thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1085:339–352. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Kuivaniemi H, Platsoucas CD and Tilson MD III: Aortic aneurysms: an immune disease with a strong genetic component. Circulation. 117:242–252. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Ruddy JM, Jones JA, Spinale FG and Ikonomidis JS: Regional heterogeneity within the aorta: relevance to aneurysm disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 136:1123–1130. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Henderson EL, Geng YJ, Sukhova GK, Whittemore AD, Knox J and Libby P: Death of smooth muscle cells and expression of mediators of apoptosis by T lymphocytes in human abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation. 99:96–104. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Tang PC, Yakimov AO, Teesdale MA, et al: Transmural inflammation by interferon-gamma-producing T cells correlates with outward vascular remodeling and intimal expansion of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms. FASEB J. 19:1528–1530. 2005.

6 

Absi TS, Sundt TM III, Tung WS, et al: Altered patterns of gene expression distinguishing ascending aortic aneurysms from abdominal aortic aneurysms: complementary DNA expression profiling in the molecular characterization of aortic disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 126:344–357. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Didangelos A, Yin X, Mandal K, et al: Extracellular matrix composition and remodeling in human abdominal aortic aneurysms: a proteomics approach. Mol Cell Proteomics. 10:M111.008128. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Matsumoto K, Maniwa T, Tanaka T, Satoh K, Okunishi H and Oda T: Proteomic analysis of calcified abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms. Int J Mol Med. 30:417–429. 2012.PubMed/NCBI

9 

Matsumoto K, Satoh K, Maniwa T, Araki A, Maruyama R and Oda T: Noticeable decreased expression of tenascin-X in calcific aortic valves. Connect Tissue Res. 53:460–468. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN, et al: Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol Cell Proteomics. 3:1154–1169. 2004.

11 

Matsumoto K: Phosphorylation of extracellular matrix tenascin-X detected by differential mass tagging followed by nanoLC-MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS/MS using ProteinPilot software. Connect Tissue Res. 53:106–116. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Shilov IV, Seymour SL, Patel AA, et al: The Paragon Algorithm, a next generation search engine that uses sequence temperature values and feature probabilities to identify peptides from tandem mass spectra. Mol Cell Proteomics. 6:1638–1655. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Mi H, Muruganujan A and Thomas PD: PANTHER in 2013: modeling the evolution of gene function, and other gene attributes, in the context of phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:D377–D386. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Sturn A, Quackenbush J and Trajanoski Z: Genesis: cluster analysis of microarray data. Bioinformatics. 18:207–208. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Hu HD, Ye F, Zhang DZ, Hu P, Ren H and Li SL: iTRAQ quantitative analysis of multidrug resistance mechanisms in human gastric cancer cells. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010:5713432010.PubMed/NCBI

16 

Magharious M, D’Onofrio PM, Hollander A, Zhu P, Chen J and Koeberle PD: Quantitative iTRAQ analysis of retinal ganglion cell degeneration after optic nerve crush. J Proteome Res. 10:3344–3362. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Imanaka-Yoshida K: Tenascin-C in cardiovascular tissue remodeling: from development to inflammation and repair. Circ J. 76:2513–2520. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Satta J, Soini Y, Pöllänen R, Pääkkö P and Juvonen T: Tenascin expression is associated with a chronic inflammatory process in abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 26:670–675. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Kimura T, Yoshimura K, Aoki H, et al: Tenascin-C is expressed in abdominal aortic aneurysm tissue with an active degradation process. Pathol Int. 61:559–564. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Majumdar R, Miller DV, Ballman KV, et al: Elevated expressions of osteopontin and tenascin C in ascending aortic aneurysms are associated with trileaflet aortic valves as compared with bicuspid aortic valves. Cardiovasc Pathol. 16:144–150. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Trescher K, Thometich B, Demyanets S, et al: Type A dissection and chronic dilatation: tenascin-C as a key factor in destabilization of the aortic wall. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 17:365–370. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Isselbacher EM: Thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation. 111:816–828. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Parry DJ, Al-Barjas HS, Chappell L, Rashid T, Ariëns RA and Scott DJ: Haemostatic and fibrinolytic factors in men with a small abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 96:870–877. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Takagi H, Manabe H, Kawai N, Goto S and Umemoto T: Plasma fibrinogen and D-dimer concentrations are associated with the presence of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 38:273–277. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Golledge J, Muller R, Clancy P, McCann M and Norman PE: Evaluation of the diagnostic and prognostic value of plasma D-dimer for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur Heart J. 32:354–364. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Yuan SM, Shi YH, Wang JJ, Lü FQ and Gao S: Elevated plasma D-dimer and hypersensitive C-reactive protein levels may indicate aortic disorders. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 26:573–581. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

27 

Ando T, Nagai K, Chikada M, et al: Proteomic analyses of aortic wall in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 52:545–555. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

28 

Shen D, Li J, Lepore JJ, Anderson TJ, et al: Aortic aneurysm generation in mice with targeted deletion of integrin-linked kinase in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 109:616–628. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Choke E, Cockerill GW, Dawson J, et al: Increased angiogenesis at the site of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1085:315–319. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Zheng YH, Tian C, Meng Y, et al: Osteopontin stimulates autophagy via integrin/CD44 and p38 MAPK signaling pathways in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Cell Physiol. 227:127–135. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Satoh K, Maniwa T, Oda T and Matsumoto K: Proteomic profiling for the identification of serum diagnostic biomarkers for abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms. Proteome Sci. 11:272013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Armstrong PB and Quigley JP: Alpha2-macroglobulin: an evolutionarily conserved arm of the innate immune system. Dev Comp Immunol. 23:375–390. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Zarins CK, Runyon-Hass A, Zatina MA, Lu CT and Glagov S: Increased collagenase activity in early aneurysmal dilatation. J Vasc Surg. 3:238–248. 1986. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Paik DC, Fu C, Bhattacharya J and Tilson MD: Ongoing angiogenesis in blood vessels of the abdominal aortic aneurysm. Exp Mol Med. 36:524–533. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

2014-April
Volume 33 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1107-3756
Online ISSN:1791-244X

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Matsumoto K, Satoh K, Maniwa T, Tanaka T, Okunishi H and Oda T: Proteomic comparison between abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms. Int J Mol Med 33: 1035-1047, 2014.
APA
Matsumoto, K., Satoh, K., Maniwa, T., Tanaka, T., Okunishi, H., & Oda, T. (2014). Proteomic comparison between abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms. International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 33, 1035-1047. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2014.1627
MLA
Matsumoto, K., Satoh, K., Maniwa, T., Tanaka, T., Okunishi, H., Oda, T."Proteomic comparison between abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 33.4 (2014): 1035-1047.
Chicago
Matsumoto, K., Satoh, K., Maniwa, T., Tanaka, T., Okunishi, H., Oda, T."Proteomic comparison between abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 33, no. 4 (2014): 1035-1047. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2014.1627