Open Access

Chrysin induces autophagy through the inactivation of the ROS‑mediated Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in endometrial cancer

  • Authors:
    • Yu He
    • Yuchuan Shi
    • Yang Yang
    • Huanhuan Huang
    • Yifan Feng
    • Yunmeng Wang
    • Lei Zhan
    • Bing Wei
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: July 13, 2021     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2021.5005
  • Article Number: 172
  • Copyright: © He et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.

Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is widely known as an aggressive malignancy. Due to the limited therapeutic options and poor prognosis of patients with advanced‑stage EC, there is a need to identify effective alternative treatments. Chrysin is a naturally active flavonoid (5,7‑dihydroxyflavone), which has been demonstrated to exert anticancer effects and may present a novel strategy for EC treatment. However, the role of chrysin in EC remains largely unclear. The aim of the present study was to examine the anticancer effects of chrysin on EC. The results revealed that, in addition to apoptosis, chrysin increased the LC3II expression levels and markedly accelerated the autophagic flux, suggesting that chrysin induced both the autophagy and apoptosis of EC cells. Furthermore, the inhibition of autophagy by chloroquine enhanced the inhibitory effect on cell proliferation and the promotion of the chrysin‑induced apoptosis of EC cells, indicating that chrysin‑induced autophagy was a cytoprotective mechanism. Additionally, chrysin led to the production of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS). N‑acetylcysteine (NAC) pretreatment significantly inhibited chrysin‑induced autophagy, suggesting that ROS activated autophagy induced by chrysin in EC cells. Furthermore, the phosphorylated (p‑)Akt and p‑mTOR levels were significantly decreased in a concentration‑dependent manner following treatment with chrysin, while NAC blocked these effects. Taken together, these findings demonstrated that chrysin‑induced autophagy via the inactivation of the ROS‑mediated Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in EC cells.

Introduction

Endometrial cancer (EC) is considered one of the most common gynecological malignancies in industrialized countries (1). Primarily due to relevant risk factors, including obesity, diabetes and aging, among others, its incidence is gradually increasing (2,3). Recurrent or advanced EC responds poorly to treatment. Few therapeutic options are available for such patients, who therefore have low survival rates and a poor prognosis (4). The 5-year survival rate for patients with stage IV disease is limited only at 0-10% (5). Accordingly, EC is increasingly recognized as a serious health and epidemiological concern. Thus, novel therapeutic approaches that can effectively reduce morbidity and mortality in EC are urgently required.

In recent years, natural compounds for cancer prevention and treatment have gained attention due to their anticancer activity and safety, and are a rich source of phytochemicals. They are an integral part of the human diet (6,7). The use of natural compounds combined with targeted drugs may provide new perspectives for the development of anticancer drugs. Chrysin (5,7-dihydroxyflavone; chemical structure shown in Fig. 1A) is a natural dietary flavonoid, commonly present in various plant extracts, including honey and propolis. It has a notable medicinal functions and economic value (8). Additionally, chrysin has diverse biological properties, specifically including anticancer, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, anti-diabetic and anti-allergenic effects (9,10). Recently, several studies have reported that chrysin exerts its cancer-suppressive effects on breast, lung, cervical and bladder cancer cells through regulating multiple cell signaling pathways selectively (11-15). However, the anti-EC possible mechanisms of chrysin have not yet been fully elucidated.

Cancer cell death is often caused by apoptosis, which is considered to be the principal anticancer mechanism (16). However, it has been documented that autophagy and apoptosis are intertwined processes (17). Autophagy is the process of engulfing and degrading cytosolic proteins and damaged organelles (18). It has been reported that the inhibition of autophagy increases the anticancer efficiency by inducing the apoptotic process (19). In addition, reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been found to be the associated factors in the anticancer effects of chrysin-induced autophagy. For example, Lin et al (20) indicated that chrysin induced ROS production and then autophagy, resulting in the attenuation of the viability of human colorectal cancer cells. This suggests that there may be a link among anticancer drugs, such as chrysin, ROS levels and autophagy pathways in EC. However, to date, at least to the best of our knowledge, there are no reports on the pharmacological mechanisms of chrysin in EC, particularly concerning its role in the regulation of cell ROS levels and autophagy pathways, which remains unclear.

The present study thus aimed to investigate the molecular mechanisms of the anticancer role of chrysin and focused on how the compound regulates the autophagy pathway in EC cells.

Materials and methods

Reagents and antibodies

Chrysin and LY294002 were purchased from MedChemExpress. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and chloroquine (CQ) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA). The cells were pretreated with 5 µM CQ, or 10 µM LY294002, or 10 mM NAC for 1 h and were then treated with chrysin for additional 24 or 48 h. The antibodies used for western blotting included monoclonal anti-LC3 (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. ab192890; Abcam), monoclonal anti-sequestosome-1/p62 (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. ab207305; Abcam), monoclonal anti-autophagy-related gene 5 (ATG5; dilution 1:1,000, cat. no. ab108327; Abcam), polyclonal anti-Beclin 1 (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. AF5128; Affinity Biosciences), polyclonal anti-Bcl-2 (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. AF6139; Affinity Biosciences), polyclonal anti-Bax (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. AF0120; Affinity Biosciences), monoclonal anti-Akt (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. 4691; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), monoclonal anti-phosphorylated (p)-Akt (Ser473; dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. 4060; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), monoclonal anti-mTOR (dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. 2983; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), monoclonal anti-p-Mtor (Ser2448; dilution 1:1,000; cat. no. 5536; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) and polyclonal anti-GAPDH (dilution 1:10,000; cat. no. AF7021; Affinity Biosciences). Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (dilution 1:10,000; cat. no. ZB-2301) and goat anti-mouse IgG (dilution 1:10,000; cat. no. ZB-2305) secondary antibodies were purchased from Beijing Zhongshan Jinqiao Biotechnology, Co., Ltd.

Cell lines and cell culture

The human endometrioid adenocarcinoma cell line, HEC-1A (cat. no. HTB-112), was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and the endometrioid adenocarcinoma cell line, Ishikawa (cat. no. 99040201), was purchased from the European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures (ECACC). Cells were maintained in high-glucose DMEM (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) supplemented with 10% v/v FBS (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C in a 95% O2 and 5% CO2 atmosphere in a humidified incubator.

Cell viability assay

The Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Biosharp Life Sciences) was used to analyze the viability of the HEC-1A and Ishikawa cells following treatment with chrysin. Briefly, 5×103 cells in 100 µl medium were plated into each well of a 96-well plate until they became adherent. In experiments evaluating the effect of chrysin alone, cells were treated with chrysin (0, 10, 20, 40 and 80 µM) for 24, 48 or 72 h. In the experiments that evaluated the combined effect of chrysin and CQ, cells were pretreated with 5 µM CQ for 1 h prior to exposure to 40 µM chrysin, and the cells were then further incubated for 48 h at 37°C. Subsequently, 10% CCK-8 solution (the ratio of volume of medium and CCK-8 was 9:1) was added to the culture medium. Following further incubation for 1 h at 37°C in the dark, a Varioskan LUX microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to measure the absorbance at 450 nm in each well.

Colony formation assay

HEC-1A and Ishikawa cells were inoculated into 6-well plates at a low cell density (1,000 cells per well) and incubated at 37°C overnight. The cells were the exposed to 40 µM chrysin and cultured for ~1 week. The medium was replaced every 3 days, in order to maintain stable chrysin concentration levels. The plates were periodically observed until distinct colonies were formed and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. After staining with 0.1% crystal violet solution (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) for 15 min at room temperature, the colonies (>50 cells per colony) were counted with ImageJ software (version 1.38; National Institutes of Health).

Flow cytometric analysis

Apoptotic cells were detected by flow cytometry and quantified according to the percentage of apoptotic cells in each group. Briefly, HEC-1A and Ishikawa cells that had been treated with the indicated concentrations of chrysin with or without 5 µM CQ were digested with trypsin without EDTA and harvested. Subsequently, the cells were resuspended in 100 µl binding buffer, and incubated with 5 µl Annexin V-FITC and 10 µl propidium iodide (PI) for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. The apoptotic ratio was measured using a Navios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc.). The upper and lower right quadrants on the dot-plot graphs represented late and early apoptotic cells, respectively.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) examination

To observe the cell morphological changes of autophagosomes and autolysosomes, TEM was performed. Briefly, HEC-1A and Ishikawa cells, following exposure to 40 µM chrysin for 48 h, were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde at 4°C overnight, and then post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide (OsO4) for 1 h followed by incubation with 2% uranyl acetate at room temperature for a further 1 h. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), the cells were dehydrated in an ethanol series, infiltrated with propylene oxide and finally embedded in epoxy resin. Ultrathin sections (70 nm) were prepared, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and then examined in a JEM-1400 TEM system (JEOL, Ltd.).

Western blotting

The cells were lysed with RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology), and the supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C in order to extract total cellular protein. After quantifying the protein concentration in the supernatant using a BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology), total protein was mixed by loading buffer and boiled at 100°C for 5 min. The denatured cell proteins (10-20 µg) were separated on 6-15% SDS-PAGE according to the molecular weight of the target proteins, and subsequently transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membranes were then blocked for 2 h at room temperature in 5% skimmed milk, and then incubated with the aforementioned diluted primary antibodies at 4°C overnight, following by incubation with the aforementioned secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. The protein bands were visualized with an enhanced chemiluminescent reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and analyzed using ImageJ version 1.38 (National Institutes of Health).

Immunofluorescence assay

Following treatment with 40 µM chrysin for 48 h, HEC-1A and Ishikawa cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. Following permeabilization with 0.5% (v/v) Triton X-100 for 15 min at room temperature, the cells were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) for 30 min and incubated with anti-LC3 antibody (dilution 1:200; cat. no. ab192890; Abcam) overnight at 4°C. Finally, the cells were incubated with the FITC-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) secondary antibody (dilution 1:400; cat. no. A0562; Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) for 1 h at room temperature, and the cell nuclei finally were stained with DAPI for 10 min in the dark. All samples were imaged using an Axio Scope A1 fluorescence microscope (Zeiss GmbH).

Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) analysis

Intracellular ROS levels were determined using a ROS assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology); 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA), a ROS-sensitive fluorescent dye, was used as the ROS detection probe. DCFH-DA was deacetylated to non-fluorescent DCFH, and ROS then oxidized DCFH to produce fluorescent DCF. The fluorescence intensity was proportional to the oxidant production levels. HEC-1A and Ishikawa cells were treated with 5 µM CQ or 10 mM NAC for 1 h prior to treatment with 40 µM chrysin for 48 h. Processed cells were incubated with 10 µM DCFH-DA diluted for 30 min at 37°C in the dark. The cells were then washed three times with serum-free DMEM to fully remove the probe. The levels of ROS, represented by the green fluorescence signal, were photographed with the use of a DP80 fluorescence microscope (Olympus Corporation).

Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs/si) and transfection

The target siRNA sequence was as follows: siATG5, 5′-GCA ACU CUG GAU GG-3′; and negative control siRNA, 5′-UUC UCC GAA CGU GUC ACG UTT-3′. All siRNAs were designed and synthesized by Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd. Prior to transfection, HEC-1A and Ishikawa cells were seeded into 6-well plates and cultured to 60-70% confluence. Cells were transfected with 50 nM siRNA using 4 µl jetPRIME® Transfection Reagent (Polyplus-transfection® SA) in 200 µl jetPRIME® buffer. These mixtures were incubated for 15 min at room temperature and added to 2 ml fresh medium per well of a 6-well plate. The cells were cultured for 24 h, and then treated with 0-80 µM chrysin for 24 or 48 h.

Statistical analysis

Data are represented as the mean ± standard deviation. The experiments were performed ≥3 times. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the experimental groups to the control values, whereas comparisons between multiple groups were performed using Tukey's multiple comparison test. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 8.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc.). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

Chrysin inhibits the proliferation and induces the apoptosis of EC cells

CCK-8 assay revealed that chrysin exerted an inhibitory effect on the proliferation of HEC-1A and Ishikawa cells, in a concentration- and time-dependent manner (Fig. 1B and C). In addition, the colony formation activity of the HEC-1A and Ishikawa cells was significantly inhibited by chrysin (Fig. 1D). These results confirmed that chrysin inhibited the proliferation of EC cells.

To investigate whether chrysin induces the apoptosis of EC cells, cell apoptosis was examined by flow cytometry after double staining with Annexin V-FITC and PI. As shown in Fig. 1E, chrysin notably increased the proportion of apoptotic cells. Bax is a pro-apoptotic protein that leads to cell death, whereas Bcl-2 is an anti-apoptotic protein that promotes cell survival (21). Western blotting revealed that the treatment of HEC-1A and Ishikawa cells with chrysin for 48 h increased the level of Bax and decreased the expression of Bcl-2 (Fig. 1F and G). These results demonstrated that chrysin induced the apoptosis of EC cells.

Chrysin initiates the autophagy of EC cells

As shown in Fig. 2A, TEM images indicated autophagosomes and autophagolysosomes in the chrysin group, which are characteristics of autophagic cells. In cells treated with 5 µM CQ for 1 h, prior to the application of 40 µM chrysin for 48 h, the aforementioned effects intensified. Immunofluorescence assay was used to detect the distribution of endogenous LC3 in HEC-1A and Ishikawa cells. In chrysin-treated cells, the intracellular localization of LC3 and abundant LC3 puncta were detected, while the control cells did not exhibit any noticeable fluorescence intensity (Fig. 2B and C). The results of western blot analysis revealed that, with an increased concentration of chrysin, the level of LC3II and Beclin 1 increased, which was accompanied by a decrease in p62 expression (Fig. 3A and B).

ATG5 participates in the vesicle elongation step of autophagy and plays critical roles in the process of autophagy (22). The present study demonstrated that the knockdown of ATG5 by siRNA reduced the chrysin-induced LC3II accumulation in HEC-1A and Ishikawa cells (Fig. 3C and D). Furthermore, the LC3II levels were markedly increased in the HEC-1A and Ishikawa cells pretreated with CQ, in comparison with the group treated with chrysin alone (Fig. 3E and F), thus confirming that chrysin promoted the autophagic flux. These results revealed that chrysin induced autophagy and increased the autophagic flux in EC cells.

The role of autophagy in chrysin-induced cell apoptosis was also assessed. The inhibition of autophagy by CQ significantly enhanced the cytotoxicity of chrysin to EC cells, which was demonstrated via the inhibition of proliferation (Fig. 4A-C) and the induction of apoptosis (Fig. 4D-F). Autophagy inhibition by CQ potentiated the chrysin-induced inhibition of cell proliferation and promoted the chrysin-induced apoptosis of EC cells. Thus, chrysin induced cytoprotective autophagy in EC cells.

Chrysin induces autophagy via ROS in EC cells

The association between ROS and autophagy is complex. To clarify whether autophagy induced by chrysin in EC cells is regulated by ROS or not, HEC-1A and Ishikawa cells were treated with chrysin for 48 h, and the level of ROS in cells was detected by DCF fluorescence intensity. Fluorescence microscopy demonstrated that chrysin-induced intracellular ROS accumulation was markedly increased, which was clearly inhibited by the ROS scavenger, NAC (Fig. 5A). ROS levels were increased to a greater extent in cells treated with a combination of chrysin and CQ, as compared with that of cells treated with chrysin alone (Fig. 5B). Notably, NAC pretreatment inhibited the increase in the LC3II level induced by chrysin (Fig. 5C and D). Collectively, it was revealed that chrysin induces cellular ROS accumulation, which may be one of the reasons for autophagy induced by chrysin in EC cells.

ROS-mediated inactivation of the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway is involved in chrysin-induced autophagy in EC cells

To further investigate the potential mechanisms of autophagy induced by chrysin, the effect of chrysin on the expression of Akt/mTOR in autophagy-related signaling pathways in EC was analyzed in the present study (23). The increase in chrysin concentration resulted in the decrease of p-Akt and p-mTOR levels in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 6A and B), suggesting that chrysin caused the inactivation of the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Pretreatment with LY294002, an inhibitor of PI3K, further decreased p-Akt and p-mTOR expression levels (Fig. 6C and D). Furthermore, LY294002 markedly increased the expression of LC3II induced by chrysin (Fig. 6E and F). These results indicated that the inactivation of the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway by chrysin contributed to autophagy activation in EC cells.

Furthermore, HEC-1A and Ishikawa cells were pre-treated with NAC and subsequently treated with chrysin, in order to evaluate the association between Akt/mTOR signal suppression and ROS accumulation. The results of western blotting reveaeld that NAC pretreatment upregulated the expression of p-Akt and p-mTOR in chrysin-treated cells (Fig. 7A and B). Overall, these findings indicated that chrysin inhibited the activity of the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway by inducing the accumulation of intracellular ROS in EC cells.

Discussion

At present, cisplatin and paclitaxel, which are the first-line chemotherapeutics applied for EC therapy, exert an inhibitory effect on cancer cell growth. However, chemoresistance remains a major obstacle in EC therapy (24). Chrysin has been reported as a potent inhibitor of breast cancer resistance protein, which is one of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, and is commonly involved in the multidrug resistance of chemotherapy (25). TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) has been regarded as an anti-cancer agent. However, certain types of cancer, including gliomas, are resistant to TRAIL-induced cell death (26). Chrysin has been shown to overcome TRAIL resistance in breast, pancreatic, cervical, colon, prostate and bladder cancer, as well as in hepatoma and melanoma cells (27). Thus, chrysin represents a potential therapeutic target for the development of clinical applications.

In the present study, it was revealed that chrysin induced protective autophagy through the ROS/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in EC cells. More specifically, chrysin induced autophagy through the upregulation of the intracellular accumulation of ROS, and the subsequent downregulation of p-Akt and p-mTOR protein levels in EC cells. Suppression of autophagy by CQ potentiated chrysin-induced apoptosis in EC cells.

Targeting autophagy is considered a promising anti-cancer therapy (28). According to previous studies, it has been demonstrated that certain anticancer natural compounds and extracts cab activate autophagy and exert anticancer effects. Dou et al (29) revealed that ivermectin induced autophagy in breast cancer cells, while Yao et al (30) demonstrated that crocin inhibited the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma through activating autophagy. Current attempts to modulate autophagy in a clinical setting are focused on using autophagy inhibition combined with other anti-cancer drugs, which are the focus of >36 clinical trials (31). In the present study, it was demonstrated that chrysin induced a protective autophagy response in EC cells. Additionally, the concurrent inhibition of autophagy along with chrysin application suppressed cell proliferation and induced cell apoptosis to a much greater extent than that observed with chrysin treatment alone. The knockdown of ATG5 by siRNA reduced the chrysin-induced accumulation of LC3II in EC cells, demonstrating that chrysin-induced autophagy was ATG5-dependent. The expression level of LC3II, which is closely associated with the number of intracellular autophagosomes, is regarded as an indicator of autophagy (32). CQ, a lysosomal degradation blocker, can improve the pH-value of lysosomes and then destroy the function of lysosomes, inhibit fusion of lysosomes and autophagosomes, thus conversely increasing LC3II expression (33). Consequently, it was deduced that the suppression of chrysin-activated autophagy enhanced the anticancer effect of chrysin in EC cells, and may be a robust candidate strategy for EC treatment.

The balance between ROS production and ROS scavenging plays an important in cell homeostasis (34). Notably, ROS may play a dual role in cancer biology, depending on their concentration. At low concentrations, ROS act as signaling molecules involved in promoting cell survival and proliferation, whereas at high concentrations, they induce programmed cell apoptosis and necrosis (35,36). Previously published studies noted that the excessive accumulation of high levels of ROS may trigger cancer cell apoptosis and death and may inhibit cancer progression during enhanced oxidative stress injury (37-39). Thus, it was concluded that, in the process of cancer progression, the analysis of ROS level fluctuation may be of importance for cancer prevention and treatment. Furthermore, autophagy is triggered in response to all types of biological stress, including increased oxidative stress (40). The fluorescence microscopy results of the present study revealed that NAC pretreatment may act as an antioxidant which remarkably inhibits ROS production and the transition from LC3I to LC3II in treated cells, thus suggesting that NAC exhibited a considerable blocking effect on chrysin-induced autophagy. Contrarily, ROS levels were notably higher when chrysin and CQ were applied simultaneously. Therefore, it was hypothesized that chrysin-induced autophagy played a protective role; however, when oxidative stress reached a degree beyond the control of the protective response of autophagy, cell death may occur by apoptosis in EC cells. These results were also consistent with the results of the aforementioned apoptotic studies. Collectively, these results implied that chrysin-induced ROS accumulation may act as an autophagy inducer in EC cells (Fig. 8).

The Akt/mTOR signaling pathway is frequently activated in human tumors and is one of the main growth regulatory pathways (41). Akt is a key upstream regulator of mTOR, and Akt activation may lead to the phosphorylation of the downstream effector mTOR, thereby negatively regulating autophagy (42,43). In the present study, chrysin suppressed Akt/mTOR signaling, indicating that chrysin induced autophagy by targeting Akt/mTOR signaling. In previously published studies, it was indicated that cellular oxidative stress is associated with the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, and Akt and mTOR are two kinases regulated by ROS (44,45). The present study revealed that NAC reversed the decrease of p-Akt and p-mTOR in chrysin-treated cells, which demonstrated the association between Akt/mTOR signal suppression and ROS accumulation by chrysin. Chrysin inhibited the growth of cancer cells by increasing oxidative stress and subsequently inhibiting the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Overall, the results suggested that chrysin-induced autophagy was triggered by inactivation of the ROS-mediated Akt/mTOR signaling pathway.

However, there were certain limitations to the present study. Firstly, only in vitro experiments were conducted. Therefore, animal experiments should be carried out to confirm the effectiveness of chrysin in vivo. Furthermore, our findings were limited to EC and did not verify the effect of chrysin in tumors other than EC, which should be investigated in future studies. Subsequently, the present study demonstrated that chrysin inhibited cell proliferation by CCK-8 and colony formation assay. It is preferable to detect the expression of cell cycle-related proteins including cyclins or CDKs in order to strengthen these conclusions. And finally, it is well known that ROS are produced from peroxisomes, the endoplasmic reticulum, and mitochondria, which is their primary source (46). Regrettably, the present study did not detect the production of ROS in mitochondria.

In conclusion, the present study confirmed for the first time, at least to the best of our knowledge, that the ROS-mediated Akt/mTOR signaling pathway played a key role in chrysin-induced autophagy in EC cells. Chrysin also induced the apoptosis of EC cells. It was also demonstrated that the inhibition of autophagy by CQ enhanced the chrysin-induced inhibition of cell proliferation and promoted chrysin-induced apoptosis, indicating that chrysin-induced autophagy played a pro-survival role in EC cells. Thus, combination treatment with an autophagy inhibitor may be a promising intervention strategy for EC treatment.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' contributions

The present study was conceived and designed by YH, YY, LZ and BW. The experiments were conducted by YH, YS, YY, HH, YF and YW. YH and YS wrote the manuscript with support from BW and YY, HH, YF, YW LZ and BW critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. YH and BW confirm the authenticity of all the raw data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

References

1 

Urick ME and Bell DW: Clinical actionability of molecular targets in endometrial cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 19:510–521. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Troisi J, Raffone A, Travaglino A, Belli G, Belli C, Anand S, Giugliano L, Cavallo P, Scala G, Symes S, et al: Development and validation of a serum metabolomic signature for endometrial cancer screening in postmenopausal women. JAMA Netw Open. 3:e20183272020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Clarke MA, Long BJ, Del Mar Morillo A, Arbyn M, Bakkum-Gamez JN and Wentzensen N: Association of endometrial cancer risk with postmenopausal bleeding in women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 178:1210–1222. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Korets SB, Czok S, Blank SV, Curtin JP and Schneider RJ: Targeting the mTOR/4E-BP pathway in endometrial cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 17:7518–7528. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Rai R, Essel KG, Benbrook DM, Garland J, Zhao YD and Chandra V: Preclinical efficacy and involvement of AKT, mTOR, and ERK kinases in the mechanism of sulforaphane against endometrial cancer. Cancers (Basel). 12:12732020. View Article : Google Scholar

6 

Ma L, Zhang M, Zhao R, Wang D, Ma Y and Li A: Plant natural products: Promising resources for cancer chemoprevention. Molecules. 26:9332021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Sauter ER: Cancer prevention and treatment using combination therapy with natural compounds. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 13:265–285. 2020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Song S, Gao K, Niu R, Wang J, Zhang J, Gao C, Yang B and Liao X: Inclusion complexes between chrysin and amino-appended β-cyclodextrins (ACDs): Binding behavior, water solubility, in vitro antioxidant activity and cytotoxicity. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 106:1101612020. View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Mani R and Natesan V: Chrysin: Sources, beneficial pharmacological activities, and molecular mechanism of action. Phytochemistry. 145:187–196. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Kasala ER, Bodduluru LN, Madana RM, Athira KV, Gogoi R and Barua CC: Chemopreventive and therapeutic potential of chrysin in cancer: Mechanistic perspectives. Toxicol Lett. 233:214–225. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Moghadam ER, Ang HL, Asnaf SE, Zabolian A, Saleki H, Yavari M, Esmaeili H, Zarrabi A, Ashrafizadeh M and Kumar AP: Broad-spectrum preclinical antitumor activity of chrysin: Current trends and future perspectives. Biomolecules. 10:13742020. View Article : Google Scholar :

12 

Roy S, Sil A and Chakraborty T: Potentiating apoptosis and modulation of p53, Bcl2, and Bax by a novel chrysin ruthenium complex for effective chemotherapeutic efficacy against breast cancer. J Cell Physiol. 234:4888–4909. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar

13 

Brechbuhl HM, Kachadourian R, Min E, Chan D and Day BJ: Chrysin enhances doxorubicin-induced cytotoxicity in human lung epithelial cancer cell lines: The role of glutathione. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 258:1–9. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar :

14 

Zhang T, Chen X, Qu L, Wu J, Cui R and Zhao Y: Chrysin and its phosphate ester inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis in hela cells. Bioorg Med Chem. 12:6097–6105. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Lima APB, Almeida TC, Barros TMB, Rocha LCM, Garcia CCM and da Silva GN: Toxicogenetic and antiproliferative effects of chrysin in urinary bladder cancer cells. Mutagenesis. 13:geaa0212020.

16 

Koff JL, Ramachandiran S and Bernal-Mizrachi L: A time to kill: Targeting apoptosis in cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 16:2942–2955. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Pang X, Zhang X, Jiang Y, Su Q, Li Q and Li Z: Autophagy: Mechanisms and therapeutic potential of flavonoids in cancer. Biomolecules. 11:1352021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Crawley O, Opperman KJ, Desbois M, Adrados I, Borgen MA, Giles AC, Duckett DR and Grill B: Autophagy is inhibited by ubiquitin ligase activity in the nervous system. Nat Commun. 10:50172019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Ranieri R, Ciaglia E, Amodio G, Picardi P, Proto MC, Gazzerro P, Laezza C, Remondelli P, Bifulco M and Pisanti S: N6-isopentenyladenosine dual targeting of AMPK and rab7 prenylation inhibits melanoma growth through the impairment of autophagic flux. Cell Death Differ. 25:353–367. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar :

20 

Lin YM, Chen CI, Hsiang YP, Hsu YC, Cheng KC, Chien PH, Pan HL, Lu CC and Chen YJ: Chrysin attenuates cell viability of human colorectal cancer cells through autophagy induction unlike 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin. Int J Mol Sci. 19:17632018. View Article : Google Scholar :

21 

Garcia-Martinez T, Vendrell-Flotats M, Martinez-Rodero I, Ordóñez-León EA, Álvarez-Rodríguez M, López-Béjar M, Yeste M and Mogas T: Glutathione ethyl ester protects in vitro-maturing bovine oocytes against oxidative stress induced by subsequent vitrification/warming. Int J Mol Sci. 21:75472020. View Article : Google Scholar :

22 

An Z, Tassa A, Thomas C, Zhong R, Xiao G, Fotedar R, Tu BP, Klionsky DJ and Levine B: Autophagy is required for G1/G0 quiescence in response to nitrogen starvation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Autophagy. 10:1702–1711. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Nunez-Olvera SI, Gallardo-Rincon D, Puente-Rivera J, Salinas-Vera YM, Marchat LA, Morales-Villegas R and López-Camarillo C: Autophagy machinery as a promising therapeutic target in endometrial cancer. Front Oncol. 9:13262019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Guo F, Zhang H, Jia Z, Cui M and Tian J: Chemoresistance and targeting of growth factors/cytokines signalling pathways: Towards the development of effective therapeutic strategy for endometrial cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 8:1317–1331. 2018.PubMed/NCBI

25 

Sharom FJ: ABC multidrug transporters: Structure, function and role in chemoresistance. Pharmacogenomics. 9:105–127. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

26 

Crommentuijn MH, Maguire CA, Niers JM, Vandertop WP, Badr CE, Würdinger T and Tannous BA: Intracranial AAV-sTRAIL combined with lanatoside C prolongs survival in an orthotopic xenograft mouse model of invasive glioblastoma. Mol Oncol. 10:625–634. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Bronikowska J, Szliszka E, Kostrzewa-Susłow E, Jaworska D, Czuba ZP, Bednarski P and Król W: Novel structurally related flavones augment cell death induced by rhsTRAIL. Int J Mol Sci. 18:12112017. View Article : Google Scholar :

28 

Rybstein MD, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Kroemer G and Galluzzi L: The autophagic network and cancer. Nat Cell Biol. 20:243–251. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Dou QH, Chen HN, Wang K, Yuan K, Lei Y, Li K, Lan J, Chen Y, Huang Z, Xie N, et al: Ivermectin induces cytostatic autophagy by blocking the PAK1/akt axis in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 76:4457–4469. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Yao C, Liu BB, Qian XD, Li LQ, Cao HB, Guo QS and Zhou GF: Crocin induces autophagic apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma by inhibiting Akt/mTOR activity. Onco Targets Ther. 11:2017–2028. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Amaravadi RK, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Yin XM, Weiss WA, Takebe N, Timmer W, DiPaola RS, Lotze MT and White E: Principles and current strategies for targeting autophagy for cancer treatment. Clin Cancer Res. 17:654–666. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Ohnishi K, Yano S, Fujimoto M, Sakai M, Harumoto E, Furuichi A, Masuda M, Ohminami H, Yamanaka-Okumura H, Hara T and Taketani Y: Identification of dietary phytochemicals capable of enhancing the autophagy flux in HeLa and Caco-2 human cell lines. Antioxidants (Basel). 9:11932020. View Article : Google Scholar

33 

Lu Y, Xiao L, Liu Y, Wang H, Li H, Zhou Q, Pan J, Lei B, Huang A and Qi S: MIR517C inhibits autophagy and the epithelial-to-mesenchymal (-like) transition phenotype in human glioblastoma through KPNA2-dependent disruption of TP53 nuclear translocation. Autophagy. 11:2213–2232. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar :

34 

Kim K, Dayem AA, Gil M, Yang GM, Lee SB, Kwon OH, Choi S, Kang GH, Lim KM, Kim D and Cho SG: 3,2′-Dihydroxyflavone improves the proliferation and survival of human pluripotent stem cells and their differentiation into hematopoietic progenitor cells. J Clin Med. 9:6692020. View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Lewinska A, Adamczyk-Grochala J, Deregowska A and Wnuk M: Sulforaphane-induced cell cycle arrest and senescence are accompanied by DNA hypomethylation and changes in microRNA profile in breast cancer cells. Theranostics. 7:3461–3477. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Ye S, Zhao T, Zhang W, Tang Z, Gao C, Ma Z, Xiong JW, Peng J, Tan WQ and Chen J: p53 isoform Δ113p53 promotes zebrafish heart regeneration by maintaining redox homeostasis. Cell Death Dis. 11:5682020. View Article : Google Scholar

37 

Deng L, Gao X, Liu B, He X, Xu J, Qiang J, Wu Q and Liu S: NMT1 inhibition modulates breast cancer progression through stress-triggered JNK pathway. Cell Death Dis. 9:11432018. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

38 

Yang CC, Tsai MH, Li KY, Hou CH and Lin FH: Carbon-doped TiO2 activated by X-ray irradiation for the generation of reactive oxygen species to enhance photodynamic therapy in tumor treatment. Int J Mol Sci. 20:20722019. View Article : Google Scholar

39 

Lim W, Ryu S, Bazer FW, Kim SM and Song G: Chrysin attenuates progression of ovarian cancer cells by regulating signaling cascades and mitochondrial dysfunction. J Cell Physiol. 233:3129–3140. 2018. View Article : Google Scholar

40 

Ru JY and Wang YF: Osteocyte apoptosis: The roles and key molecular mechanisms in resorption-related bone diseases. Cell Death Dis. 11:8462020. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Guglielmelli P, Barosi G, Rambaldi A, Marchioli R, Masciulli A, Tozzi L, Biamonte F, Bartalucci N, Gattoni E, Lupo ML, et al: Safety and efficacy of everolimus, a mTOR inhibitor, as single agent in a phase 1/2 study in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 118:2069–2076. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

42 

Zhou Y, Chen X, Qu N, Zhang B and Xia C: Chondroprotection of PPARα activation by WY14643 via autophagy involving akt and ERK in LPS-treated mouse chondrocytes and osteoarthritis model. J Cell Mol Med. 23:2782–2793. 2019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Wang YX, Yang L, Wang HQ, Zhao XQ, Liu T, Li YH, Zeng QX, Li YH and Song DQ: Synthesis and evolution of berberine derivatives as a new class of antiviral agents against enterovirus 71 through the MEK/ERK pathway and autophagy. Molecules. 23:20842018. View Article : Google Scholar :

44 

Ives A, Nomura J, Martinon F, Roger T, LeRoy D, Miner JN, Simon G, Busso N and So A: Xanthine oxidoreductase regulates macrophage IL1β secretion upon NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nat Commun. 6:65552015. View Article : Google Scholar

45 

Su Z, Burchfield JG, Yang P, Humphrey SJ, Yang G, Francis D, Yasmin S, Shin SY, Norris DM, Kearney AL, et al: Global redox proteome and phosphoproteome analysis reveals redox switch in akt. Nat Commun. 10:54862019. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

46 

Huang CR, Chang TW, Lee CT, Shen CJ, Chang WC and Chen BK: ARNT deficiency represses pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 to trigger ROS production and melanoma metastasis. Oncogenesis. 10:112021. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

September-2021
Volume 48 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1107-3756
Online ISSN:1791-244X

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
He Y, Shi Y, Yang Y, Huang H, Feng Y, Wang Y, Zhan L and Wei B: Chrysin induces autophagy through the inactivation of the ROS‑mediated Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in endometrial cancer. Int J Mol Med 48: 172, 2021.
APA
He, Y., Shi, Y., Yang, Y., Huang, H., Feng, Y., Wang, Y. ... Wei, B. (2021). Chrysin induces autophagy through the inactivation of the ROS‑mediated Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in endometrial cancer. International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 48, 172. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2021.5005
MLA
He, Y., Shi, Y., Yang, Y., Huang, H., Feng, Y., Wang, Y., Zhan, L., Wei, B."Chrysin induces autophagy through the inactivation of the ROS‑mediated Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in endometrial cancer". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 48.3 (2021): 172.
Chicago
He, Y., Shi, Y., Yang, Y., Huang, H., Feng, Y., Wang, Y., Zhan, L., Wei, B."Chrysin induces autophagy through the inactivation of the ROS‑mediated Akt/mTOR signaling pathway in endometrial cancer". International Journal of Molecular Medicine 48, no. 3 (2021): 172. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2021.5005