Transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy prior to radiofrequency thermal ablation for single hepatocellular carcinoma reduces the risk of intrahepatic distant recurrence
- Authors:
- Published online on: June 11, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2012.1512
- Pages: 903-909
Abstract
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent primary liver cancer; it is the fifth most common malignancy worldwide and the third most common cause of cancer-related mortality (1). Current options for the treatment of HCC include surgical resection, liver transplantation, transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) or chemoembolization (TACE), transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy (TAI), percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT), percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) therapy, radioembolization and molecular-targeted drugs such as sorafenib (2–5). However, HCC frequently recurs after treatment, leading to high mortality rates. In 68 to 96% of patients recurrence only occurs at intrahepatic sites (6). Therefore, prevention and effective management of intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR) are important strategies for improving overall survival after curative treatment of HCC (7).
Interferon treatment for chronic hepatitis C and nucleoside analogue treatment for chronic hepatitis B have been reported as being useful in preventing IDR after curative treatment for HCC (8–10).
The objectives of adjuvant regional chemotherapy are to prevent tumor recurrence from the primary tumor or to reduce the incidence of a second HCC. Compared with systemic chemotherapy, TAI has the advantages of increasing the local concentration of chemotherapeutic agents for killing cancer cells, while causing less damage to healthy liver tissue and reducing systemic side-effects (11). However, to our knowledge, there have been few reports on effective neoadjuvant regional chemotherapy or adjuvant regional chemotherapy for preventing IDR (7,12,13).
In our department, we have routinely performed hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy using an epirubicin-mitomycin-lipiodol emulsion for HCC when carrying out angiography, since the approval of these chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of HCC in Japan. However, convincing evidence supporting the effectiveness of TAI with an epirubicin-mitomycin-lipiodol emulsion before RFA in preventing IDR is currently lacking.
The aim of the present study was to elucidate the effectiveness of TAI using an epirubicin-mitomycin-lipiodol emulsion, administered via the proper hepatic artery to the whole liver (TAI-EML), prior to RFA, in preventing IDR for single HCC.
Materials and methods
Study design
The present study was a single center and retrospective study. Prior to angiography and RFA, written informed consent was obtained from all the patients. The protocols for angiography and RFA were approved by the ethics committee of our department (Fig. 1).
We assessed the electronic medical records of patients registered in our database. The primary endpoint was post-RFA IDR-free survival, and the secondary endpoints were local tumor progression (LTP) and overall survival (OS).
Patients
We performed RFA in 269 consecutive treatment-naive patients diagnosed with solitary and hypervascular HCC in the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Japan, between January 2004 and October 2010. During the period from January 2004 to April 2005 and from December 2008 to October 2010, we routinely performed TAI-EML prior to RFA. Between May 2005 and October 2008, only lipiodol infusion was performed prior to RFA, as we were using the protocols of several clinical studies that we had participated in. Lipiodol (Lipiodol Ultra-Fluid, Schering Japan, Osaka, Japan) accumulates selectively in tumors when infused intra-arterially (14). Therefore, lipiodol infusion was performed to improve tumor visibility when assessing the effectiveness of RFA using dynamic computed tomography (CT). A representative case is shown in Fig. 2.
Of the 269 patients mentioned above, patients who met the following inclusion criteria were analyzed: a) complete ablation of RFA; and b) no evidence of other malignancies. We excluded patients who had: a) incomplete ablation of RFA; b) interferon treatment for chronic hepatitis C; c) nucleoside analogue treatment for chronic hepatitis B; and d) only segmental TAI before RFA due to the decision of attending physicians (Fig. 1). Complete ablation was defined as no apparent residual tumors on dynamic CT performed within 7 days after RFA and was determined by three radiologists (not blinded) experienced in liver imaging. In patients with incomplete RFA, TACE was performed after RFA.
Diagnosis of HCC
HCC was diagnosed using abdominal ultrasound and dynamic CT scans (hyperattenuation during the arterial phase in all or some part of the tumor and hypoattenuation in the portal-venous phase) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), mainly based on the recommendations of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (15). Arterial and portal phase dynamic CT images were obtained at approximately 30 and 120 sec, respectively, after the injection of the contrast material. In our department, abdominal angiography combined with CT (angio-CT) assistance was performed on all patients before RFA; CT during hepatic arteriography (CTHA) was performed with the catheter tip in the proper hepatic artery and CT during arterial-portography (CTAP) was performed with the catheter tip in the superior mesenteric artery, as Yamasaki et al reported that this technique was useful for detecting small satellite nodules (16). Then, we confirmed the presence of single and hypervascular HCC with no vascular invasion using CTHA and CTAP. Immediately after evaluation using angio-CT, TAI-EML or lipiodol infusion-alone via the proper hepatic artery was performed in the same session.
Treatment procedure
TAI
A catheter was introduced into the proper hepatic artery using the Seldinger technique. This was followed by an intra-arterial infusion via the proper hepatic artery according to tumor size and liver function, of an emulsion containing epirubicin (mean dose, 28.2 mg; range, 10–40 mg), mitomycin (mean dose, 6.2 mg; range, 4–10 mg) and lipiodol (mean dose, 2.1 ml; range, 1–3 ml) in the TAI group and of lipiodol alone (mean dose, 1.9 ml; range, 1–3 ml) in the lipiodol-alone group, respectively. When patients had poor liver function, the dosage of the anticancer agents and lipiodol were reduced.
Epirubicin-mitomycin-lipiodol emulsion
Epirubicin (Farmorubicin; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Company, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) is an anthracycline-based anticancer drug and is the 4′-epimer of doxorubicin. Epirubicin, as well as doxorubicin, binds to the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) in tumor cells, leading to suppression of DNA synthesis (17). Mitomycin (Mitomycin C; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Company, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) is changed into activated metabolites by various enzymes, and these block DNA replication in tumor cells leading to antitumor effects (18). Due to the fact that epirubicin easily undergoes glucuronidation, its toxicity is milder than that of doxorubicin. In 1986, the Japan Epirubicin Study Group for Hepatocellular Carcinoma reported that in 53 HCC patients who had received TAI with epirubicin, eight of the patients had an objective response. A retrospective comparison of this result with that of patients that were treated using TAI with doxorubicin demonstrated that epirubicin was more effective than doxorubicin in terms of survival rate (17). Since that time, epirubicin has been conventionally used in TAI for HCC in Japan, and additional clinical trials have been performed in several faculties. Epirubicin alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents such as mitomycin C has been used in TAI for HCC in Asian countries, including Japan (17). Considering this background, we have conventionally performed TAI for HCC in our department with an epirubicin-mitomycin-lipiodol emulsion.
RFA
In all patients, the first session of RFA was performed within 7 days after angiography. We routinely used a cool-tip needle (Radionics Corp., Burlington, MA, USA) while performing RFA. Under local anesthesia, using the intercostal or subcostal approach, an electrode was inserted under real-time ultrasound guidance. The initial treatment was planned with one ablation for tumors of <2 cm in diameter, and two or more ablations with the overlapping technique for tumors of ≥2 cm in diameter. When tumor ablation was complete, thermal ablation was performed along the needle track. We did not use the coaxial technique. All patients were carefully observed for treatment-related complications. The procedures were all conducted under ultrasound guidance by one of five operators who had at least 3 years of experience in performing RFA.
Follow-up
Follow-up after RFA consisted of monthly blood tests and monitoring of tumor markers, including α-fetoprotein (AFP) and des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP), which were measured using a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (Lumipulse PIVKAII Eisai, Tokyo, Japan). Abdominal ultrasonography and dynamic CT scans were obtained every 3–4 months following RFA.
Definition of IDR and LTP
We defined IDR as the recurrence of a new lesion (excluding extrahepatic metastasis) at a distant site from the ablation zone detected using a dynamic CT scan. When a new lesion appeared in the same segment as the original tumor, we defined it as IDR if it was not adjacent to the ablation zone. We defined local tumor progression (LTP) as the presence of a hypervascular nodule adjacent to the ablation zone after RFA revealed using a dynamic CT scan (19). Recurrence that was distant from the ablation zone in the same segment was not included in the definition of LTP. IDR and LTP were determined by the same three radiologists (not blinded) as described above.
Statistical analysis
Intercomparison of the lipiodol-alone group and the TAI group was performed using the unpaired t-test or Fisher’s exact test. Data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation and were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. The cumulative post-RFA IDR-free survival rate, the cumulative LTP rate and the cumulative OS rate were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and tested using the log-rank test. Regarding factors contributing to IDR, the Cox proportional hazard model was used for multivariate analyses of factors that were considered significant in univariate analysis. These statistical methods were used to estimate the interval from RFA treatment. Data were analyzed using SPSS software, version 9.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for Microsoft Windows. P-values <0.05 were considered to indicate statistically significant differences.
Results
Patients and recurrence
In 94 of the 182 patients analyzed in the present study, between January 2004 and April 2005 and between December 2008 and October 2010, TAI-EML was performed prior to RFA. Over the period from May 2005 to October 2008, infusion involving lipiodol-alone via the proper hepatic artery was performed prior to RFA in 88 patients.
The baseline characteristics of the two groups are shown in Table I. The mean tumor size was 2.06 cm (range, 0.9–3.2 cm) in the TAI group and 1.97 cm (range, 0.9–3.3 cm) in the lipiodol-alone group, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of baseline characteristics. At a median follow-up interval of 36.4 months (range, 6.2–83.6 months), 55 (62.5%) of the 88 patients in the lipiodol-alone group and 31 (33.0%) of the 94 patients in the TAI group had IDR. The cumulative post-RFA IDR-free survival rates at 1, 2 and 3 years were 74.0, 50.8 and 34.9%, respectively, in the lipiodol-alone group, and 90.8, 74.8 and 70.0%, respectively, in the TAI group (P<0.001). There was a significant difference in the post-RFA IDR-free survival rate between the two groups (P<0.001) (Fig. 3).
Univariate and multivariate analysis
Using univariate analysis, age ≥70 years (P=0.046), platelet count ≥10×104/μl (P<0.001), des-γ-carboxy prothrombin level (DCP ≥100 mAU/ml) (P=0.030) and TAI-EML before RFA (P<0.001) were found to be significant factors contributing to IDR (Table II). In the multivariate analyses involving the four factors that were found to be significant in the univariate analysis, hazard ratios (HRs), 95% confidence interval and P-values are detailed in Table III. A platelet count of ≥10×104/μl and TAI-EML were found to be significant independent factors linked to IDR.
LTP
During the observation period, 16 patients (17.0%) in the TAI group and 28 patients (31.8%) in the lipiodol-alone group, respectively, had LTP. The 1-, 2- and 3-year LTP rates were: 8.4, 17.4 and 22.2%, respectively, in the TAI group and 8.6, 19.6 and 34.9%, respectively, in the lipiodol-alone group. In terms of the LTP rate, there was no significant difference between these two groups (P=0.145) (Fig. 4).
OS
During the observation period, 23 patients (24.5%) in the TAI group and 30 patients (34.1%) in the lipiodol-alone group, respectively, succumbed to the disease. Four patients (4.3%) in the TAI group and six patients (6.8%) in the lipiodol-alone group, respectively, were lost to follow-up. The causes of mortality were HCC recurrence (17 patients), liver failure (four patients) and miscellaneous causes (two patients) in the TAI group, and HCC recurrence (23 patients), liver failure (four patients) and miscellaneous causes (three patients) in the lipiodol-alone group, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates were: 96.0, 83.7 and 71.1%, respectively, in the TAI group and 96.0, 79.6 and 51.0%, respectively, in the lipiodol-alone group. In terms of the OS rate, there was a significant difference between these two groups (P=0.048) (Fig. 5).
TAI adverse events
Patients in the TAI group experienced transient fever, abdominal pain, appetite loss, nausea and elevation of liver enzymes after TAI. However, these side-effects were all grade 1 (as determined using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0) (20). Side-effects improved within 3 or 4 days folowing TAI. In the lipiodol-alone group, no side-effects were observed.
Complications associated with RFA
In terms of complications associated with RFA itself, pneumothorax in one patient, biloma in one patient and intra-abdominal bleeding in one patient in the TAI group, and biloma in one patient, refractory ascites in one patient and retroperitoneal bleeding in one patient in the lipiodol-alone group were observed. All patients with complications related to RFA improved during the same hospitalization period. However, one patient in the TAI group required re-admission due to biloma and improved after percutaneous drainage. There were no needle tract implantations and there were no mortalities due to RFA related complications.
Discussion
HCC is suitable for treatment with regional chemotherapy as it has a tendency to stay in the liver until it is at an advanced stage, with extrahepatic metastasis generally occurring late. This suggests that an effective regional chemotherapy would have a great impact on the course of HCC (21). The rationale for regional chemotherapy stems from the difference in the dual blood inflow supply via the portal vein and the hepatic artery between HCC and nontumorous liver. In hypervascular HCC, the hepatic artery generally becomes the only vessel supplying blood to the tumor. Therefore, the hepatic artery is used as a roadway to treat the tumor, whereas the non-tumorous liver is least affected since the portal vein is responsible for supplying most of its blood (6,22). Several clinical trials related to regional chemotherapy have been performed with the aim of reducing the incidence of IDR (6,7,12,13,23,24). However, to our knowledge, there have been few reports on neoadjuvant regional chemotherapy or adjuvant regional chemotherapy that was effective in preventing IDR, either prior to or following curative treatment of HCC (7,12,13).
In contrast to TAI with platinum agents such as cisplatin, TAI with an epirubicin-mitomycin-lipiodol emulsion generally does not cause renal toxicity or a hypersensitivity reaction (17,25). In fact, in the present study, there were no serious complications due to TAI-EML. In all patients, RFA was performed safely within 7 days following TAI. These results suggest that TAI-EML is a safe procedure in terms of adverse effects.
Using univariate analysis, age ≥70 years, platelet count ≥10×104/μl, DCP ≥100 mAU/ml and TAI-EML were found to be significant factors contributing to IDR. Asahina et al (26) reported that aging has become one of the most important risk factors for HCC, and Kubo et al (27) reported that the platelet count was well correlated with hepatic fibrosis and liver carcinogenesis. Findings in these two studies were similar to our findings using univariate analysis. In the present study, 36 cases (19.8%) had a DCP value of ≥100 mAU/ml. It has also been reported (28) that high DCP levels reflect the aggressiveness and progression of HCC tumors and that the DCP level is a predictor of microvascular invasion. These findings seem to correlate with our results. However, using multivariate analysis, the platelet count ≥10×104/μl and TAI-EML before RFA were found to be significant factors linked to IDR. Moreover, in terms of the OS rate, there was a significant difference between these two groups in the present study. These results suggest that suppression of the progression of hepatic fibrosis as well as TAI-EML before RFA appears useful in preventing post-RFA recurrence and might contribute to improved survival rates.
It is generally believed that recurrences after curative treatment for HCC in the early post-treatment period arise, not because of incomplete treatment of the primary tumor but because of pre-existing microscopic tumor foci that are not detected by imaging modalities; in addition, recurrence can be caused by malignant cells that have been disseminated during treatment (29). TAI-EML before RFA may prevent an increase in size of pre-existing microscopic tumor foci.
In terms of LTP, there was no significant difference in the two groups. In reducing LPT after RFA, obtaining sufficient ablative margin is considered to be essential (30).
The present study had several limitations: i) it was a retrospective study carried out over a long period of 6 years; ii) histological examination of each target HCC was not performed, although it has been reported that pathological and biological factors have been found to be useful and have helped guide clinicians in the management of HCC patients (31); iii) the median observation period in the present study was relatively short compared with previous studies; iv) patients with incomplete ablation of RFA were excluded in the present study, leading to a bias; v) there were some patients lost to follow-up, leading to the possibility of under-estimating the true recurrence and survival rates. Therefore, a prospective and randomized study of whole liver treatment with an epirubicin-mitomycin-lipiodol emulsion is required in the future. However, our findings demonstrate a significant IDR preventive effect in the TAI group, suggesting the usefulness of whole liver treatment with TAI using an epirubicin-mitomycin-lipiodol emulsion.
In conclusion, RFA and sequential TAI-EML may contribute to a longer recurrence-free period and overall survival.
References
Llovet JM, Burroughs A and Bruix J: Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 362:1907–1917. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kudo M, Izumi N, Kokudo N, Matsui O, Sakamoto M, Nakashima O, Kojiro M and Makuuchi M: HCC Expert Panel of Japan Society of Hepatology. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan: Consensus-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines proposed by the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) 2010 updated version. Dig Dis. 29:339–364. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lencioni R: Loco-regional treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 52:762–773. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, Blanc JF, de Oliveira AC, Santoro A, Raoul JL, Forner A, et al: SHARP Investigators Study Group: Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. New Eng J Med. 359:378–390. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Guy J, Kelley RK, Roberts J, Kerlan R, Yao F and Terrault N: Multidisciplinary management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 10:354–362. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhou WP, Lai EC, Li AJ, Fu SY, Zhou JP, Pan ZY, Lau WY and Wu MC: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of preoperative transarterial chemoembolization for resectable large hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg. 249:195–202. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Izumi R, Shimizu K, Iyobe T, Ii T, Yagi M, Matsui O, Nonomura A and Miyazaki I: Postoperative adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion of lipiodol containing anticancer drugs in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 20:295–301. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Nishiguchi S, Shiomi S, Nakatani S, Takeda T, Fukuda K, Tamori A, Habu D and Tanaka T: Prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic active hepatitis C and cirrhosis. Lancet. 357:196–197. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shiratori Y, Shiina S, Teratani T, Imamura M, Obi S, Sato S, Koike Y, Yoshida H and Omata M: Interferon therapy after tumor ablation improves prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma associated with hepatitis C virus. Ann Intern Med. 138:299–306. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Papatheodoridis GV, Lampertico P, Manolakopoulos S and Lok A: Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B patients receiving nucleos(t)ide therapy: a systematic review. J Hepatol. 53:348–356. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schwartz JD, Schwartz M, Mandeli J and Sung M: Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: review of the randomized clinical trials. Lancet Oncol. 3:593–603. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ishikawa T, Higuchi K, Kubota T, Seki K, Honma T, Yoshida T and Kamimura T: Prevention of intrahepatic distant recurrence by transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy with platinum agents for stage I/II hepatocelluar carcinoma. Cancer. 117:4018–4025. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chua TC, Liauw W, Saxena A, Chu F, Glenn D, Chai A and Morris DL: Systematic review of neoadjuvant transarterial chemoembolization for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 30:166–174. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kanematsu T, Inokuchi K, Sugimachi K, Furuta T, Sonoda T, Tamura S and Hasuo K: Selective effects of lipiodolized antitumor agents. J Surg Oncol. 25:218–226. 1984. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bruix J and Sherman M: Practice Guidelines Committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 42:1208–1236. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Yamasaki T, Kurokawa F, Shirahashi H, Kusano N, Hironaka K and Okita K: Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation therapy with combined angiography and computed tomography assistance for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 91:1342–1348. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar | |
[No authors listed]. Intra-arterial administration of epirubicin in the treatment of nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Epirubicin Study Group for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 19:183–189. 1987. | |
Kumari R, Sharma A, Ajay AK and Bhat MK: Mitomycin C induces bystander killing in homogenous and heterogeneous hepatoma. Molecular Cancer. 8:872009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Goldberg SN, Grassi CJ, Cardella JF, Charboneau JW, Dodd GD 3rd, Dupuy DE, Gervais D, Gillams AR, Kane RA, Lee FT Jr, et al: Society of Interventional Radiology Technology Assessment Committee; International Working Group on Image-Guided Tumor Ablation. Image-guided tumor ablation: Standardization of terminology and reporting criteria. Radiology. 235:728–739. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar | |
National Cancer Institute (USA): Common terminology criteria for adverse events, version 3.0. http://ctep.cancer.gov/reporting/ctc.html. Published August 9, 2006. | |
Lau WY, Yu SC, Lai EC and Leung TW: Transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 202:155–168. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lau WY, Lai EC, Leung TW and Yu SC: Adjuvant intra-arterial iodine-131-labeled lipiodol for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial-update on 5-year and 10-year survival. Ann Surg. 247:43–48. 2008.PubMed/NCBI | |
Wu CC, Ho YZ, Ho WL, Wu TC, Liu TJ and P’eng FK: Preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for resectable large hepatocellular carcinoma: a reappraisal. Br J Surg. 82:122–126. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang Z, Liu Q, He J, Yang J, Yang G and Wu M: The effect of preoperative transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization on disease-free survival after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 89:2606–2612. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Uyama N, Hatano E, Maetani Y, Isoda H, Shibata T, Taura K, Oe S, Naito M, Yasuchika K, Fujii H, Ikai I and Uemoto S: Efficacy and toxicity of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with cisplatin suspended in lipiodol for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 35:775–780. 2008.(In Japanese). | |
Asahina Y, Tsuchiya K, Tamaki N, Hirayama I, Tanaka T, Sato M, Yasui Y, Hosokawa T, Ueda K, Kuzuya T, Nakanishi H, et al: Effect of aging on risk for hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology. 52:518–527. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kubo S, Tanaka H, Shuto T, Takemura S, Yamamoto T, Uenishi T, Tanaka S, Ogawa M, Sakabe K, Yamazaki K and Hirohashi K: Correlation between low platelet count and multicentricity of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatol Res. 30:221–225. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kobayashi M, Ikeda K, Kawamura Y, Yatsuji H, Hosaka T, Sezaki H, Akuta N, Suzuki F, Suzuki Y, Saitoh S, Arase Y and Kumada H: High serum des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin level predicts poor prognosis after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 115:571–580. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Mazzaferro V, Romito R, Schiavo M, Mariani L, Camerini T, Bhoori S, Capussotti L, Calise F, Pellicci R, Belli G, et al: HCC Italian Task Force: Prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence with alpha-interferon after liver resection in HCV cirrhosis. Hepatology. 44:1543–1554. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim YS, Lee WJ, Rhim H, Lim HK, Choi D and Lee JY: The minimal ablative margin of radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma (>2 and <5 cm) needed to prevent local tumor progression: 3D quantitative assessment using CT image fusion. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 195:758–765. 2010. | |
Ng IO: Prognostic significance of pathological and biological factors in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 13:666–670. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |