Sorafenib increases efficacy of vorinostat against human hepatocellular carcinoma through transduction inhibition of vorinostat-induced ERK/NF-κB signaling
- Authors:
- Published online on: May 6, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2014.2423
- Pages: 177-188
Abstract
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an endemic disease in Asia and majority of patients are not suitable for curative treatment strategies including surgery, liver transplantation or local ablative therapy, because their symptoms are often at advanced stage (1). Sorafenib is the only effective drug approved by USA Food and Drug Administration to increase overall survival in patients with advanced HCC that are not amenable to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, the survival benefit is far from satisfactory, and more effective new treatment strategy for advanced HCC is needed (2).
Vorinostat or suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) is a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, which detaches chromatin from core histone and activates gene transcription. HDAC is overexpressed in HCC cell line and tumor tissues of HCC patients and may be associated with increased invasiveness (3,4). Among HCC patients who received surgical resection or liver transplantation, HDAC overexpression is a biomarker for aggressiveness and also a prognostic factor (5,6). Inhibition of HDAC by gene knockdown or inhibitor has been shown with anti-HCC effect in preclinical studies (3,4,7,8). Poor survival in patients with HCC also has been shown with overexpression of NF-κB (9,10). It has been observed that low dose SAHA may potentiate NF-κB activity (11,12), and may results in HCC progression through NF-κB-regulated effector proteins, such as cyclin D1, B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2), X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) (13).
Therefore, it is reasonable to combine HDAC inhibitor, such as SAHA, with NF-κB inhibitor and the combination effect has been unraveled in many preclinical studies. SAHA-induced apoptosis can be enhanced by NF-κB inhibition in hematologic malignancy and breast cancer (14–17). Moreover, bortezomib, which is an anti-NF-κB drug in clinical use, and HDAC inhibitor together have synergistic effect against cell lines of pancreatic cancer and HCC (12). Combination of SAHA and bortezomib has been tested in phase I clinical trials for advanced solid tumors (18,19).
Sorafenib, a targeted drug for HCC, is effective in inhibiting NF-κB activation (20). In our previous studies, both constitutive and tumor promoter-induced NF-κB activity can be suppressed by sorafenib in vitro and in vivo (13,21). Notably, whether sorafenib enhances the therapeutic efficacy of SAHA through the suppression of NF-κB activity remains unknown. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of sorafenib plus SAHA on NF-κB activation and tumor growth of HCC in vitro and in vivo by using multimodalities of molecular imaging including bioluminescent imaging (BLI), which can reveal the real-time change of intracellular NF-κB signal with times; red fluorescent protein imaging (RFPI), the signal represents the living cells; and whole-body autoradiography to demonstrate the tumor volume (13). In order to study the effect of NF-κB inhibition on anti-HCC efficacy of SAHA, HCC cells transfected with IκBα mutant vector was used as the positive control for effect of NF-κB inhibition.
Materials and methods
Construction of plasmid vector with NF-κB response element carrying reporter genes herpes simplex virus (HSV) thymidine kinase (tk) and firefly luciferase (luc2)
The construction protocol has been published in our previous study (13). In short, CMV-IRES-dsred2 vector (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) was digested by Aquaspirillum serpens (Ase) I and Bacillus megaterium (Bmt) I then blunted by Klenow enzyme to form pIres-dsred2. The NF-κB responsive element isolated from pNF-κB-luc vector (Clontech) by Micrococcus luteus (Mlu) I and Haemophilus influenzae Rd (Hind) III was blunted by Klenow enzyme and then ligated into pIres-dsred2 to form the pNF-κB-ires-dsred2 vector. The luc2, which was isolated from pGL4-luc2 (Promega, Madison, WI) by Bacillus stearothermophilus (Bst) XI and Nocardia otitidis-caviarum (Not) I and blunted by Klenow enzyme, was inserted downstream of pNF-κB-ires, which was derived from pNF-κB-ires-dsred2 after being digested by NotI and Xanthomonas badrii (Xba) I, to form pNF-κB-ires-luc2. The HSV1-tk, which was isolated from pORF-HSV1-tk (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA) by HindIII and Escherichia coli RY13 (EcoR) I then blunted Klenow enzyme, was inserted into pNF-κB-ires-luc2 to form pNF-κB-tk-luc2 vector.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell culture
Two human HCC cell lines, Huh7 and Hep3B, were used in this study. Huh7 was kindly provided by Dr Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng at the Department of Radiation Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Hep3B was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Gaithersburg, MD). Both cell lines were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with supplemental 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and cultured at 37°C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2. The Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2/rfp stable clone (transfection procedure as described) was maintained in the same medium as Huh7 with additional 500 μg/ml of G418 (Calbiochem, Darmstadt, Hesse, Germany).
Establishment of Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2/rfp stable clone from HCC cell line
Huh7 cells (2×106) were seeded in a 10-cm dia meter dish for 24 h prior to transfection. pNF-κB-tk-luc2 vector (8 μg) and 16 μl of jetPEI™ solution (Polyplus Transfection, Strasbourg, Alsace, France), diluted with 500 and 484 μl of 145 mM NaCl, respectively, were mixed and incubated for 30 min at room temperature to make the 1000 μl jetPEI™/DNA mixture. The mixture was then added to Huh7 cells and incubated at 37°C for 24 h followed by trypsinization, then cultured with DMEM containing 1 mg/ml G418 supplemented with 10% FBS for two weeks. The surviving clones were isolated and transferred to 96-well plates for cell growth. The expression of luc2 protein in each clone was assayed using BLI, and re-named as Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2 cell line.
CAG promoter (composed of CMV enhancer and β-actin promoter)-driven red fluorescent protein (RFP) vector (National RNAi Core Facility Platform, Academic Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan) was used to transfect Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2 cell line with the same strategy as the afore-mentioned protocol. Two weeks after RFP vector transfection, cells with red fluorescence were sorted and isolated by flow cytometry. The isolated cells were transferred to 96-well plates for growth. The RFP expression in each clone was assayed using an IVIS50 Imaging System (Xenogen, Alameda, CA). This bioluminescent cell clone with simultaneous red fluorescence was renamed as Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2/rfp cell line.
Transfection of Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2 with IκBα mutant vector
Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2 cells transfected with IκBα mutant vector (pI-κBαM, Clontech) was used as the positive control for the inhibition of NF-κB as compared with that suppressed by sorafenib treatment. In addition, Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2 cell line transfected with empty vector was used as the negative control for NF-κB inhibition.
Extraction of sorafenib
The method for extraction of sorafenib was described in our previous study (21). Briefly, sorafenib was extracted from commercial Nexavar® tablets (Bayer, Leverkusen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany) composed of 200 mg sorafenib. The tablet was ground to fine powder and transferred to a 100-ml conical flask. The powder was washed with 15 ml deionized distilled water three times to remove water-soluble components; 15 ml ethyl acetate was then used to extract the precipitate three times in order to recover the sorafenib. The organic phases were combined and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, followed by evaporation under reduced pressure. The residue was recrystallized with acetone and hexane to yield a white solid extract weighing about 122 mg (60% recovery). Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded with a spectrometer (Varian Gemini 200; Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK) to determine the chemical structure of the sorafenib extract. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was conducted using a PU-2089 plus quaternary gradient pump, equipped with a UV-2075 Plus intelligent UV/VIS detector (Jasco, Tokyo, Kanto, Japan). The 1H-NMR spectrum of the recovered sorafenib was the same as the one reported before (22). More than 98% chemical purity was achieved for the recovered sorafenib (retention time, 16.2 min) as determined with HPLC.
Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2/rfp tumor bearing animal model
Male nude mice (n=6 per group and repeated 3 times, total 72 mice, 4–6 weeks old, purchased from National Laboratory Animal Center, Taipei, Taiwan) were injected subcutaneously with 1×107 Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2/rfp cells in the right hind flank. Mice were randomly divided into four groups (Fig. 5): control [vehicle treated with 100 μl phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) in 1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) daily by gavage], SAHA alone (25 mg/kg/day for 21 days by gavage), sorafenib alone (20 mg/kg/day for 21 days by gavage) and combination (SAHA plus sorafenib, 25 mg/kg/day plus 20 mg/kg/day for 21 days by gavage). All treatments were administered by gavage. Treatment was initiated when tumor volume reached about 50 mm3. Tumor volume was assayed with digital caliper twice a week and BLI once a week. Mice were sacrificed on day 21 post-treatment for ex vivo EMSA, ex vivo western blotting, and whole-body autoradiography. The animal study protocols complied with institutional animal care and use guideline of National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cell viability assay
3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was dissolved in PBS (145 mM NaCl, 1.4 mM KH2PO4, 4.3 mM Na2HPO4 and 2.7 mM KCl, pH 7.2). Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2/rfp cells were seeded into 96-well plates with 3×104 cells/well for 24 h, then treated with different concentrations of SAHA (0–10 μM in 0.1% DMSO) or SAHA combined with 10 μM sorafenib for additional 48 h. After washing with fresh medium, 100 μl of 5 mg/ml MTT solution was added to each well followed by incubation at 37°C for 2 h. Then 100 μl DMSO was added to dissolve the MTT formazan, and the absorbance was determined with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) reader (Power Wave X340, Bio-Tek, Winooski, VT) using a wavelength of 570 nm for excitation.
DNA fragmentation assay
Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2/rfp cells (1×106) were seeded in 6-well plates and treated with vehicle (0.1% DMSO), 10 μM SAHA, 10 μM sorafenib or combination of both for 48 h. After treatment a genomic DNA purification kit (Axygen, Tewksbury, MA) was used to extract DNA following the instruction provided by the manufacturer. DNA laddering was analyzed with 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)
Forty-eight hours post-treatment with vehicle, 10 μM SAHA, 10 μM sorafenib and combination of SAHA and sorafenib, respectively, nuclear fractions of Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2/rfp cells were obtained using Nuclear Extraction kit (Chemicon, Temecula, CA). The NF-κB/DNA binding activity was evaluated using LightShift Chemiluminescent EMSA kit (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL). The procedure followed the protocol provided with the kit. In brief, DNA sequences were synthesized for NF-κB binding. Sense: AGTTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAGGC and antisense: GCCTGGGAAAGTCCCCTCAACT. Nuclear extracts were incubated with the biotin-labeled DNA probe for 20 min at room temperature. The protein-DNA complex was separated from free oligonucleotides on a 5% polyacrylamide gel, then transferred to a nylon membrane and cross-linked with UV light. The membrane was incubated with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase, and detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL, Thermo Scientific).
Ex vivo EMSA
Mice were sacrificed on day 21 and tumors were removed for nuclear protein extraction by using Nuclear Extraction kit (Chemicon). The NF-κB/DNA binding activity was evaluated using LightShift Chemiluminescent EMSA kit (Thermo Scientific).
Western blotting
Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2/rfp cells (2×106) were seeded into a 10-cm diameter dish (5 dishes/group) for 24 h prior to the treatment with vehicle, 10 μM SAHA, 10 μM sorafenib or combination of 10 μM SAHA and 10 μM sorafenib, respectively, for another 48 h. Cells were then lysed with 100 μl lysis buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 120 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonylfluoride]. Total proteins (40 μg) were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), then transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA), blocked with 5% non-fat milk in TBS-Tween buffer (0.12 M Tris-base, 0.15 M NaCl and 0.1% Tween-20) for 1 h at room temperature, and then incubated with primary antibody (Millipore) for XIAP, BCL-2, VEGF, cyclin D1, c-FLIP, caspase-3, caspase-8, cytochrome-C, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and β-actin, respectively, overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with secondary peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody for 30 min at room temperature. The expressions of proteins were determined by ECL (Millipore). ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) was used for the quantitative analysis. A cytosol/nuclear extraction kit (Chemicon) was used to extract cytosolic cytochrome-C following the manufacturer’s protocol.
Ex vivo western blotting
Mice were sacrificed on day 21 after treatments. Tumors were removed for protein extraction using T-PER kit (Thermo Scientific). Equal amounts of protein (40 μg) were loaded for SDS-PAGE, then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies specific for VEGF, XIAP, BCL-2, cyclin D1, c-FLIP, caspase-3 and caspase-8, cytochrome-C, ERK and β-actin, followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. The protein expression was determined by ECL. A cytosol/nuclear extraction kit (Chemicon) was used to extract cytosolic cytochrome-C following the manufacturer’s protocol.
Therapeutic efficacy evaluation by molecular imaging in vitro and in vivo
Procedure for each modality of molecular imaging was described in our previous study (13). In brief, BLI was used for monitoring the NF-κB activation in Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2/rfp cells. A total of 3×104 Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2/rfp cells were cultured in a 96-well plate for 48 h, then treated with various concentrations of SAHA (0–10 μM), 10 μM sorafenib, combination of SAHA and sorafenib, and 10 μM of various signaling molecule inhibitors for 48 h, respectively. D-luciferin (100 μl of 500 μM, Xenogen) was added to each well for imaging. Relative NF-κB activity was calculated as follows: ROI value of treatment group/ROI value of control group, and both ROIs were corrected by cell viability which was determined by MTT assay. BLI was also used in monitoring temporal change of NF-κB activation in the Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2/rfp tumor-bearing mice. Mice were anesthetized using 1–3% isoflurane and received 150 mg/kg D-luciferin via intraperitoneal injection 15 min before imaging. RFPI was used for monitoring viable tumor cell growth in the Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2/rfp tumor bearing mice. The photons emitted from tumors obtained by BLI and RFPI were detected with an IVIS50 Imaging System (Xenogen). The image acquiring periods for BLI and RFPI were 5 min and 30 sec, respectively. Regions of interest (ROIs) of the images were drawn conformally to the tumor contour and quantified as photons/sec using Living Image software (Version 2.20, Xenogen).
Whole-body autoradiography
Mice were injected intravenously with 3.7×106 Bq/0.2 ml 131I-1-(2-deoxy-2-fluoro-1-D-arabinofuranosyl)-5-iodouracil (FIAU) on day 21 post-treatments, and sacrificed 24 h later for whole-body autoradiography. Frontal sectioning was performed with thickness of 30 μm at −20°C with a cryostat microtome (Bright Instrument, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, UK). Sections were placed on the imaging plate (BAS-SR2040, Fuji Photo Film, Tokyo, Kanto, Japan) in the cassette (2040, Fuji Photo Film). After exposure, the imaging plate was assayed with a FLA5000 reader (Fuji Photo Film) to acquire the phosphor image. The parameters of the reader were: resolution of 10 μm, gradation of 16 bits, 635-nm laser light and 800 V of photomultiplier tube.
Statistical analysis
All data were shown as the mean ± standard error. Student’s t-test was used for the comparison between two groups. Differences between the means were considered significant at p<0.05 or less.
Results
Sorafenib enhances SAHA cytotoxicity through extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways in HCC
The viabilities of both Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2/rfp and Hep3B cells were decreased linearly (Fig. 1A and B) with increasing SAHA concentrations (2–10 μM) with or without 10 μM sorafenib concurrently. Either SAHA or sorafenib alone induced apoptosis through extrinsic (cleaved caspase-8) and intrinsic (cytochrome-C) pathways as unraveled by increased expressions of apoptosis-related proteins (Fig. 1E and F). Combination of SAHA and 10 μM sorafenib not only enhanced HCC cytotoxicity, but accompanied by obvious DNA fragmentation and significantly increased expression of pro-apoptotic proteins (Fig. 1).
Contradictory effects of short (24 h) and long (48 h) treatment time with SAHA on NF-κB activity and expressions of NF-κB-regulated effector proteins in Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2/rfp cells
After treatments with various concentrations of SAHA for 24 h, the NF-κB activity was inhibited significantly in HCC cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2A), and 10 μM SAHA reduced effector proteins expressions (Fig. 2B) to 50% of those of the controls. Notably, SAHA significantly induced NF-κB activity in a dose-dependent manner after 48 h treatments (Fig. 2C), and increased the expressions of NF-κB-regulated effector proteins by 1.5- to 2-fold except cyclin D1 as compared to those of the controls (Fig. 2D).
NF-κB inhibition enhances anticancer effects of SAHA against Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2 cells
SAHA-induced NF-κB/DNA binding activity was inhibited with the transfection of pI-κBαM in Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2 cells (Fig. 3A). Cell viability after SAHA treatment was significantly decreased in Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2 cells transfected with pI-κBαM as compared with that transfected with empty vector (Fig. 3B). Apoptosis based on the DNA fragmentation assay was significantly increased in the combination group as compared with those of others groups (Fig. 3C). The transfection of pI-κBαM inhibited SAHA-induced expression of NF-κB-regulated downstream effector proteins and increased SAHA-induced apoptotic-related proteins (Fig. 3C and D).
Sorafenib inhibits SAHA-induced NF-κB activity and NF-κB-regulated effector proteins expressions via suppression of ERK activation in Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2/rfp cells
Intrinsic NF-κB activation, SAHA-induced NF-κB activity and expressions of downstream effector proteins were suppressed significantly by sorafenib as shown in Fig. 4A–C. Among the inhibitors for signal transduction, i.e., AKT inhibitor, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) inhibitor, ERK inhibitor and P38 inhibitor, only ERK inhibitor shows similar effect as sorafenib in suppressing SAHA-induced NF-κB activation (Fig. 4D). Furthermore, SAHA-induced ERK phosphorylation in Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2/rfp cells was suppressed by sorafenib as shown in Fig. 4E.
Sorafenib enhances therapeutic efficacy of SAHA in Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2/rfp tumor-bearing mice
Experimental design for the study in vivo is shown in Fig. 5. Though the tumor volumes of SAHA-treated mice were smaller as compared with those of the control, no significant difference was found. Both sorafenib-treated and combination groups had significantly smaller tumor volumes throughout the experimental period until day 21 as compared with those of the control. Notably, the highest tumor suppression was found in the combination group (Fig. 6A). The viable tumor cell growth was evaluated with RFPI once a week. The emitted photon flux correlates well with the number of viable tumor cells (13). The results demonstrated in Fig. 6B were similar to those shown in Fig. 6A. Since the NF-κB level could be increased by SAHA treatment for 48 h, the NF-κB activation inside the tumor was observed by BLI once a week. The higher photon flux represents the more intense NF-κB activity (20). SAHA significantly increased the NF-κB activity as compared with that of the control, but the increase of NF-κB activity could be suppressed by sorafenib as shown in the combination group (Fig. 6C). Simultaneous imaging of living tumor cells and NF-κB activity by RFPI and BLI, respectively, was shown in Fig. 6D. In addition, the uptake of 131I-FIAU in tumors, which represented the NF-κB activity, assayed by whole-body autoradiography (13) were also shown to be the most prominent in SAHA-treated mice. Lower uptake of 131I-FIAU in sorafenib-treated and combination groups than that of the control was found (Fig. 7A). Furthermore, sorafenib not only inhibited SAHA-induced NF-κB/DNA binding activity, but expression of oncogenic proteins as well, while enhanced expression of SAHA-induced pro-apoptotic proteins by ex vivo western blotting (Fig. 7C).
Discussion
HDACs including HDAC 1, 3, 8 (class I) and 6 (class IIB) have been shown to correlate with HCC progression, and all of these enzymes can be inhibited by SAHA (23). NF-κB activity in the renal cell carcinoma treated with low concentration (500 nM) of SAHA for 24–36 h could be induced by 1.35- to 1.8-fold above the control (11). NF-κB has also been reported to be related to chemoresistance through enhancing tumor proliferation, anti-apoptosis, and invasiveness (24). Here we used high SAHA concentration (10 μM) instead of 2.5–5 μM as used in most literature (23,25,26), and longer treatment time (48 h) to achieve higher cytotoxicity for HCC cells (Fig. 1A and B). This strategy resulted in 2-fold increase in NF-κB activity as compared to that of the control (Figs. 2C, 4A and 4D). As a result, the subsequent increased expressions of NF-κB-regulated oncogenic proteins (Figs. 2D, 4C and 7C), which may hamper treatment efficacy, made it a concern when adopting high dose SAHA to treat HCC in clinic. Notably, cancer cells treated with short-term (24 h) SAHA suppressed NF-κB activity in a dose-dependent manner as shown in Fig. 2A. This was also observed with other cancer cell lines (11,26). Though the preclinical and clinical phase I evidence indicate that HDAC inhibition is effective against various cancer cell lines (8), the potential menace of NF-κB activation after heavily pre-treated solid or hematologic malignancy should be addressed. In our previous studies, we have shown that sorafenib could be used as an NF-κB inhibitor to suppress constitutive and induced NF-κB activity (13,21). Here we demonstrated that NF-κB activity and expressions of its regulated oncogenic proteins were significantly induced in Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2/rfp cells treated with 10 μM SAHA, which was equivalent to the maximal clinical dosage (27), for 48 h but could be suppressed by 10 μM sorafenib (Fig. 4). Since combination of sorafenib and SAHA results in the better therapeutic efficacy both in vitro and in vivo (Figs. 1A and 6A), this approach may be a potential strategy for the treatment of HCC in clinic. Combination of low dose (500 nM) SAHA and sorafenib (3 μM) has been reported to kill HCC synergistically through the inhibition of cellular FLICE-like inhibitory protein (c-FLIP) and induction of cluster of differentiation 95 (CD95), the latter is ceramide-PP2A-reactive oxygen species-(ROS) dependent (11,28,29). c-FLIP expression in HCC cells could be suppressed by the treatment of high dose (2–10 μM) short-term (24 h) SAHA (Fig. 2B), but increased after 48 h treatment (Fig. 2D). c-FLIP expression was also suppressed in HCC cells transfected with pI-κBαM (Fig. 3D) or treated with the regular clinical dose (10 μM) of sorafenib (Fig. 4C), the latter effectively inhibited constitutive or induced NF-κB activation in Huh7 cells via suppression of ERK/NF-κB pathway (13,21). Since sorafenib has been reported to eradicate HCC through multiple kinase inhibition (2), we used multiple signal transduction inhibitors to suppress SAHA-induced NF-κB activity (Fig. 4D). Notably, only ERK inhibitor showed the same effect as sorafenib to suppress SAHA-induced NF-κB activity. Herein we propose that sorafenib inhibits SAHA-induced NF-κB activity is through the dephosphorylation of ERK both in vitro and in vivo (Figs. 4E and 7C). It is reasonable to deduce that sorafenib enhances anticancer effect of SAHA through the suppression of ERK/NF-κB pathway.
Paradoxical increase of c-FLIP and induced NF-κB activation after high dose, long-term (48 h) SAHA treatment is the niche for sorafenib to be complementary in the combination regimen for cancer treatment. Here we demonstrated the combination strategy worked well in vivo (Figs. 6 and 7). Though the HDAC inhibitor is not yet tested in clinical trial for patients with HCC, phase I study for sorafenib combined with SAHA in patients with solid tumors including renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and non-small cell lung cancer has been completed (30). Among 8 patients with RCC, there were 1 partial response and 5 minor responses. The promising result may make future phase II trial more likely. Another small phase II trial exhibited the efficacy of SAHA plus bortezomib in refractory hematologic malignancy (31). However, unfavorable phase II clinical trial results for solid tumors (32,33) and SAHA in combination with NF-κB inhibition may be accompanied with intolerable toxicity (30,31).
In our previous study, we demonstrated the visualization of temporal change of intracellular NF-κB signal activation in Huh7/NF-κB-tk-luc2/rfp tumor-bearing animal model (13). Here the constitutive NF-κB signals were found to be increased with the progression of tumor growth in both the control and SAHA treated groups. In contrast, lower NF-κB activation and decreased expressions of NF-κB-regulated oncogenic proteins were observed in sorafenib-treated (with or without SAHA) mice, and the tumor growth was inhibited throughout the experiment, particularly in mice treated with SAHA plus sorafenib (Figs. 6C, 6D and 7C). Although tumor growth in mice treated with SAHA alone was found to be slower as compared with that of the control, the NF-κB activity induced by SAHA allowed tumors to grow more rapidly than mice treated with sorafenib. Therefore, suppression of NF-κB activation during HCC treatment with SAHA may be critical for the improvement of therapeutic efficacy.
In conclusion, we found that NF-κB signal can be activated by SAHA with long treatment time (48 h), and results in increased expressions of NF-κB-regulated oncogenic proteins. Sorafenib inhibits SAHA-induced NF-κB activity and expressions of NF-κB-regulated oncogenic proteins while enhances therapeutic efficacy of SAHA against HCC both in vitro and in vivo through suppression of ERK/NF-κB signaling pathway. Sorafenib combined with SAHA may have potential as a new treatment strategy for the treatment of advanced HCC.
Abbreviations:
BCL-2 |
B-cell lymphoma 2; |
BLI |
bioluminescent imaging; |
ERK |
extracellular signal-regulated kinases; |
HCC |
hepatocellular carcinoma; |
HDAC |
histone deacetylase; |
luc |
luciferase; |
NF-κB |
nuclear factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; |
rfp |
red fluorescent protein; |
RFPI |
red fluorescent protein imaging; |
SAHA |
suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid; |
TACE |
transarterial chemo-embolization; |
tk |
thymidine kinase; |
VEGF |
vascular endothelial growth factor; |
XIAP |
X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein |
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grants NSC 101-2314-B-010-045-MY3, NSC 102-2321-B-010-005 from National Science Council, Taipei, Taiwan; and RD2014-012 from National Yang-Ming University Hospital, Yilan, Taiwan. The imaging facility was supported by Taiwan Mouse Clinic.
References
Feng M and Ben-Josef E: Radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Radiat Oncol. 21:271–277. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zhang X, Yang XR, Huang XW, et al: Sorafenib in treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 11:458–466. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kanno K, Kanno S, Nitta H, et al: Overexpression of histone deacetylase 6 contributes to accelerated migration and invasion activity of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Oncol Rep. 28:867–873. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Wu J, Du C, Lv Z, et al: The up-regulation of histone deacetylase 8 promotes proliferation and inhibits apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci. 58:3545–3553. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rikimaru T, Taketomi A, Yamashita Y, et al: Clinical significance of histone deacetylase 1 expression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology. 72:69–74. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wu LM, Yang Z, Zhou L, et al: Identification of histone deacetylase 3 as a biomarker for tumor recurrence following liver transplantation in HBV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One. 5:e144602010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Machado MC, Bellodi-Privato M, Kubrusly MS, et al: Valproic acid inhibits human hepatocellular cancer cells growth in vitro and in vivo. J Exp Ther Oncol. 9:85–92. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Coradini D and Speranza A: Histone deacetylase inhibitors for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 26:1025–1033. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yoshida K, Sasaki R, Nishimura H, et al: Nuclear factor-kappaB expression as a novel marker of radioresistance in early-stage laryngeal cancer. Head Neck. 32:646–655. 2010.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ni W, Chen B, Zhou G, et al: Overexpressed nuclear BAG-1 in human hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with poor prognosis and resistance to doxorubicin. J Cell Biochem. 114:2120–2130. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang G, Park MA, Mitchell C, et al: Vorinostat and sorafenib synergistically kill tumor cells via FLIP suppression and CD95 activation. Clin Cancer Res. 14:5385–5399. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Spratlin JL, Pitts TM, Kulikowski GN, et al: Synergistic activity of histone deacetylase and proteasome inhibition against pancreatic and hepatocellular cancer cell lines. Anticancer Res. 31:1093–1103. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang WH, Chiang IT, Liu YC, et al: Simultaneous imaging of temporal changes of NF-kappaB activity and viable tumor cells in Huh7/NF-kappaB-tk-luc2/rfp tumor-bearing mice. In vivo. 27:339–350. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Dai Y, Rahmani M, Dent P and Grant S: Blockade of histone deacetylase inhibitor-induced RelA/p65 acetylation and NF-kappaB activation potentiates apoptosis in leukemia cells through a process mediated by oxidative damage, XIAP downregulation, and c-Jun N-terminal kinase 1 activation. Mol Cell Biol. 25:5429–5444. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Domingo-Domenech J, Pippa R, Tapia M, Gascon P, Bachs O and Bosch M: Inactivation of NF-kappaB by proteasome inhibition contributes to increased apoptosis induced by histone deacetylase inhibitors in human breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 112:53–62. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dai Y, Guzman ML, Chen S, et al: The NF (nuclear factor)-kappaB inhibitor parthenolide interacts with histone deacetylase inhibitors to induce MKK7/JNK1-dependent apoptosis in human acute myeloid leukaemia cells. Br J Haematol. 151:70–83. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dai Y, Chen S, Wang L, et al: Disruption of IkappaB kinase (IKK)-mediated RelA serine 536 phosphorylation sensitizes human multiple myeloma cells to histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 286:34036–34050. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schelman WR, Traynor AM, Holen KD, et al: A phase I study of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in patients with advanced malignancies. Invest New Drugs. 31:1539–1546. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Deming DA, Ninan J, Bailey HH, et al: A Phase I study of intermittently dosed vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs. 32:323–329. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu YC, Chiang IT, Hsu FT and Hwang JJ: Using NF-kappaB as a molecular target for theranostics in radiation oncology research. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 12:139–146. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chiang IT, Liu YC, Wang WH, et al: Sorafenib inhibits TPA-induced MMP-9 and VEGF expression via suppression of ERK/NF-kappaB pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. In vivo. 26:671–681. 2012. | |
Bankston D, Dumas J, Natero R, et al: A scaleable synthesis of BAY 43-9006 a potent Raf kinase inhibitor for the treatment of cancer. Org Process Res Dev. 6:777–781. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Marks PA and Breslow R: Dimethyl sulfoxide to vorinostat: development of this histone deacetylase inhibitor as an anticancer drug. Nat Biotechnol. 25:84–90. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li F and Sethi G: Targeting transcription factor NF-kappaB to overcome chemoresistance and radioresistance in cancer therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1805:167–180. 2010.PubMed/NCBI | |
Galimberti S, Canestraro M, Khan R, et al: Vorinostat and bortezomib significantly inhibit WT1 gene expression in MO7-e and P39 cell lines. Leukemia. 22:628–631. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Takada Y, Gillenwater A, Ichikawa H and Aggarwal BB: Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid potentiates apoptosis, inhibits invasion, and abolishes osteoclastogenesis by suppressing nuclear factor-kappaB activation. J Biol Chem. 281:5612–5622. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chen KF, Chen HL, Tai WT, et al: Activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway mediates acquired resistance to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J Pharm Exp Ther. 337:155–161. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Park MA, Zhang G, Martin AP, et al: Vorinostat and sorafenib increase ER stress, autophagy and apoptosis via ceramide-dependent CD95 and PERK activation. Cancer Biol Ther. 7:1648–1662. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Park MA, Mitchell C, Zhang G, et al: Vorinostat and sorafenib increase CD95 activation in gastrointestinal tumor cells through a Ca(2+)-de novo ceramide-PP2A-reactive oxygen species-dependent signaling pathway. Cancer Res. 70:6313–6324. 2010.PubMed/NCBI | |
Dasari A, Gore L, Messersmith WA, et al: A phase I study of sorafenib and vorinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors with expanded cohorts in renal cell carcinoma and non-small cell lung cancer. Invest New Drugs. 31:115–125. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Warlick ED, Cao Q and Miller J: Bortezomib and vorinostat in refractory acute myelogenous leukemia and high-risk myelodys-plastic syndromes: produces stable disease but at the cost of high toxicity. Leukemia. 27:1789–1791. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hoang T, Campbell TC, Zhang C, et al: Vorinostat and bortezomib as third-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a Wisconsin Oncology Network Phase II study. Invest New Drugs. 32:195–199. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Friday BB, Anderson SK, Buckner J, et al: Phase II trial of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in recurrent glioblastoma: a north central cancer treatment group study. Neuro Oncol. 14:215–221. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |