Expression pattern of the PRDX2, RAB1A, RAB1B, RAB5A and RAB25 genes in normal and cancer cervical tissues
- Authors:
- Published online on: October 23, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2014.2724
- Pages: 107-112
Abstract
Introduction
Alternative splicing is a process in which either different combinations of exons or parts of exons are employed to generate new transcripts through the use of alternative-splicing sites. More than 90% of human intron-containing genes undergo alternative splicing, which allows a single transcript to encode a number of RNAs that produce various protein isoforms with different functions (1). A complex array of cis elements (the splicing code) embedded in pre-mRNAs, together with trans-acting factors that bind to these elements, are required for the precise process of pre-mRNA splicing and its regulation. The splicing code for the majority of introns comprises short sequences that include the 5′ and 3′ splice sites located at both intron-exon junctions and at the branch point. These sequences are recognized by the spliceosome, which is composed of five small nuclear ribonucleoproteins and ~150 proteins. In addition to the core cis elements in pre-mRNAs, other sequences in introns and exons, which are recognized by cellular trans-acting factors, are also critical to the determination of splicing outcomes (2).
In the last few years, a link has emerged between cancer development and deregulation of alternative splicing (3). Approximately 10% of inherited or somatic mutations are localized within sequences coding canonical splice sites (4), and these mutations have been implicated in cancer susceptibility and tumor progression. One such example is the tumor suppressor gene p53, the most commonly mutated gene in human cancers. Isoforms of the p53 gene are created through alternative splicing, and their tumor suppressor functions differ (5). ‘Silent’ mutations in the p53 gene have been predicted to affect splicing by creating splice sites in the middle of an exon (6). Recently, it has been reported that an attenuated form of familiar adenomatous polyposis is caused by the insertion of a single T between the second and third nucleotide of intron 4 of the APC gene, which leads to the skipping of exon 4, and a predicted expression of a truncated protein (7). Another good example of altered splicing in tumorigenesis occurs in the tumor suppressor gene BRCA1. Mutations in the BRCA1 gene are well-known markers of susceptibility to ovarian and breast cancer, the latter being the most common malignancy in women. One such mutation in the BRCA1 gene is an inherited nonsense mutation within exon 18 that disrupts the exonic splicing enhancer of the gene, provoking exon skipping (8).
Alterations in signaling pathways cause changes in the abundance, localization and activity of splicing regulators, which in turn can cause a general deregulation of splicing, and result in the occurrence of cancer-specific transcripts that are associated with tumorigenesis. Recent progress in molecular and cell biology has indicated that altered splicing profiles of critical genes may impact all aspects of cancer cell biology (9), resulting in the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes (6), or the gain of function of proteins implicated in cancer susceptibility and tumor progression (9,10).
Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a necessary, but not sufficient factor in the development of cervical neoplasia, and persistent infection with high-risk HPV types, especially HPV16, is a significant risk factor in the development of precancerous lesions and squamous cell carcinoma (11–14). HPV-16, -18, -45, -31 and -33 are the most frequently identified high-risk HPV types in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and squamous cell carcinoma (15), though HPV16 predominates (16). An association has also been suggested between high viral load and the persistence of HPV infection (17). Promising HPV-related markers of the risk of progression to cervical cancer include the integration status of high-risk HPV DNA in precancerous cervical lesions (18). HPV DNA integration into the host cell genome usually disrupts the E1 and E2 open reading frames, but leaves those of E6 and E7 intact (19,20). The deletion of the E2 open reading frame due to HPV DNA integration leads to the disruption of E2 protein expression, and the upregulation of E6 and E7 protein transcription (21); continuous production of the oncogenic E6 and E7 proteins contribute to malignant progression.
It was recently demonstrated that level of the splicing activator ASF/SF2 (also known as arginine/serine-rich splicing factor 1) is modulated in the presence of HPV infection (22), as is the splicing silencer heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 (hnRNP A1). The latter is a trans-acting factor that can modulate splice site selection (23), which may result in a change in the splicing pattern of a number of mRNAs expressed in HPV-infected cervical tissue. A previous proteomic analysis we preformed of vaginal and cervical cancer identified a number of tumor-specific markers (24). The biggest increase in cancer-related expression was observed for the prdx2 protein, which was found to be upregulated in cervical cancer, and the Rab1b protein (a member of the RAS oncogene family), which was found to be upregulated in both vaginal and cervical cancers. Based on these results, the present report further investigates the splicing patterns of the PRDX2 and RAB1B genes in normal cervical tissue, preinvasive cervical lesions and invasive cervical tumors. We also studied the expression patterns of other RAB gene members of the RAS oncogene family - RAB1A, RAB5A and RAB25, which are associated with different cancers.
Materials and methods
Between 2012 and 2013, 28 women were enrolled in the present study: 10 healthy female volunteers (c1–c10), eight women with preinvasive cervical lesions (p1–p8), and 10 women with invasive cervical tumors (i1–i10). Each woman underwent a pelvic examination followed by biopsy collection at one of two departments in Stockholm, Sweden: the Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska University Hospital, or the Department of Gynecological Oncology, Radiumhemmet, Karolinska University Hospital. All biopsies were immediately flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80°C. Biopsies were grouped according to morphological diagnosis. Ethical approval was obtained from the Regional Ethics Review Board in Stockholm, and an informed consent form was signed by all participants prior to inclusion.
RNA preparations, cDNA synthesis
Approximately 30 mg of biopsy tissue was homogenized in microtubes with disposable pestles driven by cordless motor (VWR, Radnor, PA, USA). Total RNA from homogenized biopsies was isolated using RNeasy kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA (200 ng) was reverse transcribed with SuperScript III, and amplified with Platinum Taq DNA polymerase in 30 μl of a one-step RT-PCR system (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The reverse transcription reaction was performed at 50°C to destroy mRNA secondary structures.
3′ RACE RT-PCR
To detect multiple transcripts of the PRDX2, RAB1A, RAB1B, RAB5A and RAB25 genes, we applied the rapid amplification of cDNA 3′ ends (3′ RACE) RT-PCR approach, which uses the natural polyA tail that exists at the 3′ end of most eukaryotic mRNAs for priming during reverse transcription. cDNAs were generated using an oligo-dT-adaptor GACTCGAGTCGACATCGATAG(T)19 primer that complements the polyA stretch and adds a special adaptor sequence to the 5′ end of each cDNA. Further amplification of cDNAs in the one-step RT-PCR reaction was performed using the reverse TAILR, GACTCGAGTCGACATCGATAG primer targeting the adaptor sequence, and forward PRDX164F, CAGTCATGGCCTCCGGTAA; RAB1A397F, CTGCAGTGACATGTCCAGCAT; RAB1B16F, CCATGAACCCCGAATATGACTA; RAB5A508F, CTGGAAGTTCATTGAAGAGTTGA; and 25RAB210F, CTCCATGCGGAGCCAAGAT primers, corresponding to sequences located in the 5′ regions of the untranslated parts of the PRDX, RAB1A, RAB1B, RAB5A and RAB25 transcripts, respectively. As these forward primers are located in front of the initiation ATG codons, PCR products corresponding to both the PRDX or RAB transcripts included the entire translated region in each case. The resulting PCR products were gel-purified using QIAquick gel extraction kits (Qiagen), and then further amplified and sequenced by BigDye Terminator kits (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using the internal reverse primers PRDX864R, GGTCCCATACTGTGGAGTT; RAB1A2522R, CCATGTATTTCAATTGCCTGTT (or RAB1A1957R, CTACCTCTACCACAGATGCATT); RAB1B1701R, GACTTGCTTTCTTGCAGGAAGCA (or RAB1B1551R, TCCCTGGTGGGCTCCAGAGA); RAB5A2493R, CCAACCTGAGCACCTCAATATA (or RAB5A2057R, CCTATTTACAGTACAGCTGAAGAT); and 25RAB1077R, GGACAGATAAAAGAGGTATTTGTG which correspond to the sequences located within untranslated 3′ regions of the PRDX, RAB1A, RAB1B, RAB5A and RAB25 genes, respectively. RAB1A, RAB1B, RAB5A and RAB25 internal reverse primers were also used in 40 cycles of nested PCR for further analyses of non-specific (NS) DNA generated from the first round of PCR and separated on agarose gels.
Results
Total RNAs from normal cervical tissue, preinvasive cervical lesions and invasive cervical tumors, were screened for the presence of PRDX, RAB1A, RAB1B, RAB5A and RAB25 transcripts by a sensitive RT-PCR approach. The primers used in the PCR reaction spanned the entire coding region of all five genes, and each case included the initiation ATG codon and the polyA tail. All PRDX amplification products from normal cervical tissue, preinvasive cervical lesions and invasive cervical tumors consisted of a single PCR product generated from the full-length transcripts (data not shown).
All RAB1A amplification products from all samples of normal cervical tissue, preinvasive cervical lesions and invasive cervical tumors consisted of a long PCR product and two shorter 400 and 550 bp bands (Fig. 1A). All these products, were cut from the gel, and the DNA was extracted and amplified by nested PCR employing the RAB116F primer (the same forward primer used in the first round of PCR) and the RAB1A2522R primer, which targets the sequence located within the 3′ untranslated region of the transcript. This round of amplification generated only one shorter (~400 bp) RAB1A-specific band, which was also extracted from the gel and sequenced using the RAB1A397F forward and RAB1A2522R or RABA1957R reverse primers. Sequence analysis revealed that a long PCR product (FL) was generated from the full-length transcripts while 400 bp band correspond to a new spliced transcripts (SP) where non-classical splicing sites were used to excise the RAB1A sequence between exons 4 and 6 (Fig. 1B and C).
To eliminate possibility of missing RAB1A transcripts which did not amplify sufficiently due to some cDNA/PCR reaction bias, and were thus undetectable in gel analyses of first-round PCR product, we also analyzed by nested PCR DNA extracted from all samples in the areas between FL and NS bands, NS and SP bands and SP band and 250 bp but did not find any new RAB1A-specific PCR fragments.
RAB1B amplification products from invasive cervical tumors consisted of a single PCR product generated from the full-length transcripts of this gene (Fig. 2C), while amplification products from all normal cervical tissue and preinvasive cervical lesions consisted of a shorter PCR product of ~600 bp, together with some visible less abundant amplification products in the range of 400–500 bp (Fig. 2A and B). To further analyze full-length and shorter products, they were cut from the gel, and the DNA was extracted and amplified by a nested PCR reaction employing the RAB116F primer (the same forward primer as used in the first round of PCR) and the RAB1B1701R reverse primer targeting the sequence located within the 3′ untranslated region of the transcript. This round of amplification generated three new RAB1B-specific PCR products which were sequenced using the RAB116F forward and RAB1701R and RAB1551R reverse primers. We also further amplified first round PCR material from normal and preinvasive tissues in the range 250–400 and 500–1400 bp (i.e., excluding full-length and 400–500 bp product) but did not detect any shorter RAB1B-specific PCR products.
RAB1B amplification products from invasive cervical tumors consisted of a single PCR product generated from the full-length transcripts of this gene. As no visible bands corresponding to the shorter RAB1B-specific products (found in normal tissues or preinvasive lesions) were detected in invasive tumors after analyzing of 2 μl (equal for all samples in all groups) of standard RT-PCR reactions (data not shown), we analyzed larger (8 μl) volumes of the RT-PCR reactions from invasive tumors (Fig. 2C). However, no visible bands corresponding to new shorter Rab1b-specific products were observed. DNA from the regions of the gel corresponding approximately to the range 250–1400 bp (i.e., including the visible product at ~270 bp (Fig. 2C), but excluding the prominent full-length product) and also from the region containing the product corresponding to full-length cDNA, were extracted from the gel and subjected to nested PCR. However, this yielded no RAB1B-specific products, suggesting that all this material represents NS amplification products from the first round of PCR reactions, in which cDNAs of invasive tumor material were used as templates.
An interesting feature of the RAB1B alternative splicing pattern was that the pattern of expression was similar for all individuals of the same group, reflecting the existence of common mechanisms for the generation of new transcripts.
The RT-PCR experiments were designed so that the RNAs of the same amount were treated in the same way from the same master mix in three independent experiments. Thus, these results serve as good controls for RNA integrity and confirm that the new RAB1B forms detected in the study are not artifacts. Sequence analysis revealed that all of the shorter RAB1B-specific PCR products Sp1, Sp2 and Sp3 (Fig. 3) correspond to three new transcripts with sizes of 600, 484 and 422 bp, respectively. In the Sp1 and Sp3 transcripts, classical splicing sites are used to excise the RAB1B sequence between exons 4 (Sp1) or 3 (Sp3), and exon 6, while the Sp2 transcript is generated due to splice sites comprised of non-classical splicing signals (Fig. 3).
All RAB5A and RAB25 amplification products from normal cervical tissue, preinvasive cervical lesions and invasive cervical tumors consisted of a single PCR product corresponding to the full-length transcripts of RAB5A and RAB25 (data not shown). We extracted all DNA in the area between 250 bp and the full-length band from all samples and amplified DNA extracts by nested PCR employing the same forward primers used in the first round of PCR, and reverse RAB5A- and RAB25-specific primers targeting the sequence located within the 3′ untranslated regions of the transcripts. We did not detect any new RAB5A- or RAB25-specific PCR products.
Discussion
In this study we investigated transcription of PRDX2, RAB1A, RAB1B, RAB5A and RAB25 genes in normal cervical tissue, preinvasive cervical lesions and invasive cervical tumors. PRDX2 and RAB1B gene expression was found to be associated with cervical cancer in our proteomics study (24). The RAB1A gene is structurally and functionally very similar to the RAB1B gene, and is associated with the occurrence of tongue and prostate cancers (25,26). The RAB5A gene is also similar to the RAB1B gene; it is upregulated in cervical cancer and expresses a protein that is a key regulator of intracellular vesicle traffic from the plasma membrane to early endosomes. Silencing of RAB5A expression in human cervical carcinoma in HeLa and SiHa cell lines decreased cell motility and invasiveness (27). RAB25 gene expression is upregulated in ovarian and breast cancers, and the level of Rab25 protein overexpression is associated with more aggressive cancer forms (28).
We found that only the closely related RAB1A and RAB1B genes could express alternatively spliced RNAs in cervical tissue. No spliced forms of the RAB1A or RAB1B genes have been described thus far, making the findings described in this study novel. We also demonstrate that new RAB1B mRNA transcripts, which are expressed in normal cervical tissue and preinvasive cervical lesions, are downregulated in invasive cervical tumors.
Both RAB1A and RAB1B genes consist of five introns and six exons (Figs. 1 and 2), and belong to a group of small Ras-related GTP-binding proteins encoded by RAB genes, and participate in the regulation of vesicular transport from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi in mammalian cells. Many of the >60 different human Rab proteins that have been identified have been localized to discrete subcellular compartments (29).
All new RAB1A and RAB1B transcripts found in this study contain an initiation translation codon ATG, and therefore should be capable of being translated into proteins. An interesting feature of such proteins (ΔSp, ΔSp1, ΔSp2 and ΔSp3) is that all of them are the products of short reading frames (1–79 aa for ΔSp, 1–66 aa for ΔSp1, 1–72 aa for ΔSp2 and 1–51 aa for ΔSp3) in which the N-terminus of the RAB1B gene is followed by very short, unspecific amino acid sequences (Figs. 1 and 2). The Rab1a and Rab1b protein sequences are very similar and contain several functional domains. A detailed domain/function description for the Rab1a/b proteins is not yet available, but it is still possible to predict that the new proteins contain one or two GTP-binding sites, for Rab1b protein at positions 15–22 and 63–67, respectively (http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q9H0U4). All of the other known domains of the Rab1b protein: the Swich 2, a determinant of nucleotide-dependent functions aa 64–84, the CAAX box which directs post-translational modifications, and the hypervariable region targeting Rab1b to specific membranes (both located near the -COOH terminus of the protein), are missing from the new Rab1b (and most probably from Rab1a) proteins. Both Ras and several Rab proteins are known to be implicated in the development of different cancers (25–28,30). Variations in Ras protein expression have tumorigenic potential, since membrane traffic is of key importance in cancer biology due to its influence on cell polarity in the metastatic transformation of tumor cells (29). Ras/Rab proteins are involved in malignant progression, as they are key components of the signal transduction pathways triggered by different mitogens (30). Because Rab proteins can interact with their molecular targets in the GTP bound conformation, it could be hypothesized that tissue-specific alternative splicing and translation of both Rab1a/b and likely other Rab proteins as well, could generate peptides that only retain GTP-binding sites; thus the multitude of such peptides effectively translated from the short reading frames could influence the intracellular concentrations of GTP, which regulates tumorigenesis and other cellular functions. The disappearance of the alternative transcripts of the RAB1B gene in invasive cervical cancer could be related to known molecular mechanisms of HPV tumorigenesis. In cervical cancer, one of the key events of malignant transformation is HPV DNA integration into the host chromosome. This is followed by the sustained expression of the viral late genes E6 and E7, whilst other portions of the viral DNA are deleted or undergo transcription disturbance (31). Such events could reduce cellular levels of the splicing activator ASF/SF2 (activated by the HPV E2 protein) in tumors, while the splicing silencer hnRNP A1 is upregulated after HPV infection (23). Thus the splicing of a number of genes, including RAB1B, which may be dependent on the ASF/SF2: hnRNP A1 ratio, could be inhibited.
We used nested PCR to amplify all RAB1A, RAB1B, RAB5A and RAB25 first-round PCR DNA products extracted from all agarose gel areas which did not contain visible bands, but did not find any gene-specific products. This eliminated possibility of missing potential transcripts which did not amplify sufficiently due to some cDNA/PCR reaction bias, and were thus undetectable in gel analyses of first-round PCR products.
In conclusion, these results suggest that multiple, alternatively spliced RAB1A/B transcripts are generated in human cervical tissue and may be translated into short proteins that are capable of GTP binding. The expression of RAB1B transcripts is inhibited in invasive cervical tumors, probably due to a shift in the HPV-regulated ratio between splicing activators and splicing inhibitors. A study of other members of the Ras/Rab family in the same types of tissue as those in this study would be of great interest to determine whether the silencing of alternative splicing identified in this study has a more general impact on cervical cancer development. Analysis of RAB1B may also help to identify women who are at risk of developing cervical cancer. Indeed, the definition of an objective molecular marker to identify these women is of extreme importance, as cytomorphological identification has proven difficult, and the percentage of HPV positivity in young women is high. Therefore, we plan to conduct both retrospective studies using archival liquid-based cytology samples, and prospective randomized studies using routinely collected slides.
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Trudy Perdrix-Thoma for editing assistance and English language review.
References
Black DL: Mechanisms of alternative pre-messenger RNA splicing. Annu Rev Biochem. 72:291–336. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Singh RK and Cooper TA: Pre-mRNA splicing in disease and therapeutics. Trends Mol Med. 18:472–482. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pal S, Gupta R and Davuluri RV: Alternative transcription and alternative splicing in cancer. Pharmacol Ther. 136:283–294. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Garcia-Blanco MA, Baraniak AP and Lasda EL: Alternative splicing in disease and therapy. Nat Biotechnol. 22:535–546. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mills AA: p53: link to the past, bridge to the future. Genes Dev. 19:2091–2099. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lamolle G, Marin M and Alvarez-Valin F: Silent mutations in the gene encoding the p53 protein are preferentially located in conserved amino acid positions and splicing enhancers. Mutat Res. 600:102–112. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Neklason DW, Solomon CH, Dalton AL, Kuwada SK and Burt RW: Intron 4 mutation in APC gene results in splice defect and attenuated FAP phenotype. Fam Cancer. 3:35–40. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mazoyer S, Puget N, Perrin-Vidoz L, Lynch HT, Serova-Sinilnikova OM and Lenoir GM: A BRCA1 nonsense mutation causes exon skipping. Am J Hum Genet. 62:713–715. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ghigna C, Valacca C and Biamonti G: Alternative splicing and tumor progression. Curr Genomics. 9:556–570. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
David CJ and Manley JL: Alternative pre-mRNA splicing regulation in cancer: pathways and programs unhinged. Genes Dev. 24:2343–2364. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bosch FX and Muñoz N: The viral etiology of cervical cancer. Virus Res. 89:183–190. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al: Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 189:12–19. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
zur Hausen H: Papillomaviruses and cancer: from basic studies to clinical application. Nat Rev Cancer. 2:342–350. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
Muñoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S, et al: Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 348:518–527. 2003. | |
Muñoz N: Human papillomavirus and cancer: the epidemiological evidence. J Clin Virol. 19:1–5. 2000. | |
Clifford GM, Smith JS, Plummer M, Muñoz N and Franceschi S: Human papillomavirus types in invasive cervical cancer worldwide: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 88:63–73. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sundström K, Ploner A, Dahlström LA, et al: Prospective study of HPV16 viral load and risk of in situ and invasive squamous cervical cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 22:150–158. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
Lazo PA: Papillomavirus integration: prognostic marker in cervical cancer? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 176:1121–1122. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kalantari M, Karlsen F, Kristensen G, Holm R, Hagmar B and Johansson B: Disruption of the E1 and E2 reading frames of HPV 16 in cervical carcinoma is associated with poor prognosis. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 17:146–153. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kalantari M, Blennow E, Hagmar B and Johansson B: Physical state of HPV16 and chromosomal mapping of the integrated form in cervical carcinomas. Diagn Mol Pathol. 10:46–54. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Romanczuk H and Howley PM: Disruption of either the E1 or the E2 regulatory gene of human papillomavirus type 16 increases viral immortalization capacity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 89:3159–3163. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
McPhillips MG, Veerapraditsin T, Cumming SA, et al: SF2/ASF binds the human papillomavirus type 16 late RNA control element and is regulated during differentiation of virus-infected epithelial cells. J Virol. 78:10598–10605. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Cheunim T, Zhang J, Milligan SG, McPhillips MG and Graham SV: The alternative splicing factor hnRNP A1 is up-regulated during virus-infected epithelial cell differentiation and binds the human papillomavirus type 16 late regulatory element. Virus Res. 131:189–198. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hellman K, Alaiya AA, Becker S, et al: Differential tissue-specific protein markers of vaginal carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 100:1303–1314. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shimada K, Uzawa K, Kato M, et al: Aberrant expression of RAB1A in human tongue cancer. Br J Cancer. 92:1915–1921. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sun T, Wang X, He HH, et al: MiR-221 promotes the development of androgen independence in prostate cancer cells via downregulation of HECTD2 and RAB1A. Oncogene. 33:2790–2800. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu SS, Chen XM, Zheng HX, Shi SL and Li Y: Knockdown of Rab5a expression decreases cancer cell motility and invasion through integrin-mediated signaling pathway. J Biomed Sci. 18:582011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Cheng KW, Lahad JP, Kuo WL, et al: The RAB25 small GTPase determines aggressiveness of ovarian and breast cancers. Nat Med. 10:1251–1256. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hutagalung AH and Novick PJ: Role of Rab GTPases in membrane traffic and cell physiology. Physiol Rev. 91:119–149. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hernández-Alcoceba R, del Peso L and Lacal JC: The Ras family of GTPases in cancer cell invasion. Cell Mol Life Sci. 57:65–76. 2000.PubMed/NCBI | |
Münger K, Baldwin A, Edwards KM, et al: Mechanisms of human papillomavirus-induced oncogenesis. J Virol. 78:11451–11460. 2004. |