Expression and anticancer activity analysis of recombinant human uPA1‑43-melittin

  • Authors:
    • Manman Su
    • Weiqin Chang
    • Manhua Cui
    • Yang Lin
    • Shuying Wu
    • Tianmin Xu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 13, 2014     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2014.2750
  • Pages: 619-626
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The present study is focused on expression of a target fusion protein which can be used in ovarian cancer target therapy. It aimed to construct human urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA)1‑43-melittin eukaryotic expression vector to express recombinant human uPA1‑43-melittin (rhuPA1‑43-melittin) in P. pastoris and to detect its anticancer effects on ovarian cancer cells. The DNA sequences that encode uPA1‑43 amino acids and melittin were synthesized according to its native amino acid sequences and consequently inserted into pPICZαC vector. Then uPA1‑43-melittin -pPICZαC was transformed into P. pastoris X-33, and rhuPA1‑43-melittin was expressed by methonal inducing. The bioactivities of recombinant fusion protein were detected with inhibition effects on growth of ovarian cancer cells, cell cycle detection and TUNEL assay. The results of DNA sequence analysis of the recombinant vector uPA1‑43-melittin -pPICZαC demonstrated that the DNA encoding human uPA 1‑43 amino acids and 1-26 amino acids of melittin was correctly inserted into the pPICZαC vector. After being induced by methonal, fusion protein with molecular weight 7.6 kDa was observed on the basis of SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis. The recombinant protein was able to suppress growth of SKOV3, induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of SKOV3 cells. The fusion protein does not have any obvious toxicity on normal tissues. RhuPA1‑43-melittin was successfully expressed in P. pastoris. Taking uPA1‑43 amino acids specifically binding to uPAR as targeted part of fusion protein, and making use of antitumor activity of melittin, the recombinant fusion protein it was able to inhibit growth of ovarian tumors and to be applied for effective targeted treatment.

Introduction

Metastasis is a multi-step process that involves spreading of cancer cells from the primary to the secondary site. During this process, cancer cells must invade the surrounding tissue, penetrate the blood or lymphatic vessels, and form a new tumor mass at distant sites (1). This process requires the participation of several proteolytic enzyme systems, such as serine proteases and metalloproteases (2). Urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) is a serine protease that interacts with its receptor, the uPA receptor (uPAR). After activation, cell-bound uPA is capable of converting plasminogen into plasmin, which is then able to regulate multiple pathways that are involved in matrix degradation, cell motility, metastasis and angiogenesis (3,4).

uPA is synthesized as a single-chain proenzyme which is activated by proteolytic cleavage (5), to form the high-molecular-weight two-chain active uPA or the low-molecular-weight uPA through the action of plasmin, kallikrein, or cathepsin B (6). uPA is composed of a carboxyl-terminal serine protease domain and an amino-terminal fragment (ATF) that consists of an epidermal growth factor-like domain (EGF-domain) and a kringle domain (7). uPA is recruited to cell surfaces via high affinity interaction of the EGF-domain (amino acids 4–43) with the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored uPAR (8,9).

The level of uPAR is undetectable or very low in the majority of normal tissues or organs (10). However, uPAR is highly expressed in many tumor types, such as ovarian, breast, pancreatic and lung cancers (11,12). A high level of uPAR expression in tumor cells correlates with aggressive tumor types, tumor metastasis and poorer prognosis (13). Since studies showed that prevention of uPA from binding to uPAR decreases invasion, uPA represents a potential therapeutic target in cancer (14). A number of small molecule uPA inhibitors have been developed, however, most of these inhibitors lack sufficiently documented specificity (7).

Melittin, a major component of bee venom, is a 26-amino acid polypeptide. It has been reported to have multiple effects, such as anti-inflammatory, anti-arthritic, and anti-virus effects in various cell types (15). It has also been reported to have induced apoptosis, cell cycle arrest and growth inhibition and suppressed the signaling pathway in various tumor cells (1618). However, the toxicity of melittin on normal tissues limits its application.

So in this study, we took advantage of uPA EGF-domain specific binding to uPAR and the antitumor effects of melittin to design and express fusion protein that contained uPA amino acids 1–43 and melittin in Pichia pastoris. The fusion protein can compete with uPA to bind uPAR and reduce toxicity of melittin on normal tissues. As a result, the recombinant fusion protein, recombinant human uPA1–43-melittin (rhuPA1–43-melittin), was able to inhibit growth of ovarian tumors and to be applied for effective targeted treatment.

Materials and methods

Strains, vectors, and reagents

All restriction enzymes, DNA marker, and protein marker were purchased from Takara Biotechnology (Japan). The P. pastoris X-33, pPICZαC vector, and zeocin antibiotic were obtained from Invitrogen (CA, USA) and all primers were synthesized by Sangon Biotechnology Corp. (Shanghai, China). pPICZαC vector without cleavage of Ste13 was reconstructed by our lab. The murine anti-human urokinase monoclonal antibody was obtained from American Diagnostica Inc. (USA). PCR purification kit, gel extraction kit, and Miniprep kit for plasmid extraction were obtained from Sangon Biotechnology Corp. SP Sepharose XL and Source™30 RPC reversed phase hydrophobic chromatography were purchased from Phamarcia (Sweden). YPD, BMGY, BMMY media were prepared as formula (Invitrogen). HBL100 human breast epithelial cell line and SKOV3 human ovarian cancer cell line were obtained from the type culture collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China).

P. pastoris was grown in YPD (2% peptone, 1% yeast extract, and 2% dextrose) or BMGY (0.1 M potassium phosphate, 2% peptone, 1% yeast extract, 1.34% YNB, and 1% glycerol). BMMY was used for protein induction (0.1 M potassium phosphate, 2% peptone, 1% yeast extract, 1.34% YNB and 0.5% methanol). YPD-zeocin plates (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% dextrose, 2% agar, and 0.1 zeocin) were used for selecting positive transformants.

Construction of expression vector pPICZαC-uPA1–43-melittin

The DNA sequence that encodes uPA amino-terminal fragment 1–43 amino acids and 26 amino acids of melittin was synthesized according to its native amino acid sequences and inserted into plasmid Bluescript II (pBs) by Sangon Biotechnology Corp. For the sake of insertion into pPICZαC vector and secreted expression the fusion protein, XhoI site and the Kex2 site were added to the 5′ end, termination codon and the EcoRI site were added to the 3′ end. In order to improve the yield of the fusion protein, synonymous codons were replaced by yeast biased codons. The full length gene which we designed to express rhuPA1–43-melittin fusion protein was as followed: ctc gag aag aga tct aac gag ttg cac caa gtt cca tct aac tgt gac tgt ttg aac ggt ggt act tgt gtt tct aac aag tac ttc tct aac att cac tgg tgt aac tgt cca aag aag ttc ggt ggt caa cac tgt gag gtt att ggt gct gtt ttg aag gtt ttg act act ggt ttg cca gct ttg att tct tgg att aag aga aag aga caa caa tga gaa ttc.

The recombinant plasmid pBs-uPA1–43-melittin was digested with XhoI and EcoRI, the resulting uPA1–43-melittin DNA fragment then was inserted into the corresponding sites of the expression vector pPICZαC. Then the recombinant plasmid was transformed into competent cells of Escherichia coli XL-Blue and the recombinant colonies were selected by zeocin (25 μg/ml) resistance. Both the nucleotide sequences of the inserted DNA and flanking sequence were verified by sequencing with Genome Lab DTCS-Quick Start kit and CEQ 2000 DNA analysis system (Beckman, USA).

Transformation of P. pastoris and selection of high-level expression colonies. Plasmid DNA pPICZαC-uPA1–43-melittin was linearized with SacI and introduced into Pichia host cells P. pastoris X33 by electroporation using a Micropulser (Bio-Rad, USA) according to the pPICZα vector manual. After the electroporation, 1 M ice-cold sorbitol was added immediately, and the cuvette contents were incubated at 30°C for 60 min. The mixture was spread on yeast extract peptone dextrose (YPD) agar plates containing zeocin and cultured at 30°C for two days. Antibiotic zeocin was used in the concentration of 0.1 g/l. After the transformants with zeocin resistance appeared, some monoclonal transformants were picked up randomly from the plates and initially cultured in a 50-ml conical tube containing 10 ml BMGY medium at 28°C with shaking at 225 rpm for 24 h. The cloned cells were then centrifuged and resuspended in 10 ml BMMY medium to induce expression for 7 days. The culture media (0.5 ml) were sampled per day and centrifuged at 4°C, 10,000 rpm for 5 min. Cell pellets and supernatant were separated. The supernatant was used for recombinant protein detection and the cell pellets were used for genomic DNA analysis. Methanol was added every 24 h to a final concentration of 0.5% (v/v) for inducing the expression of the target protein. The blank plasmids of pPICZαC were also transformed as a negative control.

Optimized expression of rhuPA1–43-melittin in P. pastoris

In order to achieve high level expression of rhuPA1–43-melittin, different culture parameters including pH value and induction time were evaluated in the expression procedure. The pH values were adjusted to 3.5–7.0 with 0.5 intervals. The processes were the same as above and the pH values were adjusted every day with disodium hydrogen phosphate and citric acid. At the desired time-points, 0.5-ml cell aliquots were withdrawn and then replaced with equal amount of fresh medium. The supernatant samples were used for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Individual wells of ELISA plate (Costar, USA) were coated with 50 μl supernatant sample of rhuPA1–43-melittin which had been diluted with 50 μl coating buffer (15 mM Na2CO3, 35 mM NaHCO3, pH 9.6) overnight at 4°C. The plates were blocked with 5% (w/v) non-fat milk powder in TPBS (PBS with 0.05% Tween-20) and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. The murine anti-human urokinase monoclonal antibody (American Diagnostica Inc., USA) was used at 1:1,000, incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Following several washes with TPBS, the plates were incubated with goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated to HRP (Dingguo, China) (1:250 dilution with blocking buffer) for 1 h again. The color reaction was developed by addition of the substrate solution ortho-phenylenediamine (OPD) and incubated for 5 min at room temperature in the dark. Then 50 μl stop solution (2 M H2SO4) was added to each well. The absorbance values at 490 nm were read in ELX800 Microplate Reader (Bio-Tek, USA). The reading work was finished within 2 h after adding the stop solution.

Large-scale expression and purification of rhuPA1–43-melittin

The highest-level expression transformant was cultured in a 5-l shake flask containing 2 l BMGY medium at 28°C until the culture reached OD600 = 6.0, the cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 2 l BMMY (pH 6.0) medium, and cultured at 28°C with shaking for 4 days. Sampling of the culture medium was performed every 24 h to analyze cell wet weight, optical density and determine rhuPA1–43-melittin expression based on SDS-PAGE analysis, and the culture was supplemented daily with 10 ml methanol to a final concentration of 0.5% (v/v) for inducing the expression of rhuPA1–43-melittin.

A cation exchange chromatographic column (20 ml, SP Sepharose XL, Sweden) was equilibrated with 100 ml 20 mM NaAc-HAc (pH 3.5) buffer. The supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 10 min and was clarified with a 0.45-μm cellulose membrane. After being diluted four times with 20 mM NaAc-HAc (pH 3.5) buffer, the pH of the fermentation broth was adjusted to 3.5 with 1 M acetate acid. The supernatant was loaded onto the cation exchange chromatographic column at the rate of 0.5 ml/min. Then the column was washed extensively with the same buffer at the rate of 1 ml/min. The bound protein was eluted with a linear gradient of 0.1–1.0 M NaCl while the flow rate was maintained at the rate of 1 ml/min. Protein elution was monitored by measuring the absorbance at 280 nm and identified by SDS-PAGE analysis. Column effluent containing rhuPA1–43-melittin was collected and submitted to Vivaflow 200 (Sartorius Stedim, Germany) at the rate of 1 ml/min to remove impurity proteins with molecular weight >10 kDa. Then the ultrafiltrate containing rhuPA1–43-melittin was loaded onto a reverse phase column (2.0×15 cm, Source 30, Sweden) which was equilibrated with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) for further purification. RhuPA1–43-melittin was eluted using 50% methanol containings 0.1% TFA and 100% methanol (containing 0.1% TFA) at the rate of 1 ml/min and monitored by measuring the UV absorbence at 280 nm. Column effluent containing rhuPA1–43-melittin was concentrated by vacuum distillation and freeze drying to remove methanol. The finally purified rhuPA1–43-melittin was stored at −80°C for further studies.

SDS-PAGE and western blot assays

SDS-PAGE analysis was performed using an 18% gel. For western blotting, proteins in the gel were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% BSA for 1 h and then incubated with the murine anti-human urokinase monoclonal antibody for 12 h. After being washed, the membrane was incubated with the goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated to HRP (Dingguo), diluted to 1:250. The bound antibody was detected using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB).

N-terminal amino acid sequence analysis

To determine the N-terminal sequence, the purified rhuPA1–43-melittin was electrophoresed on 18% SDS-PAGE gel and electroblotted on a PVDF membrane. After being blotted, the PVDF membrane was stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R250, and the rhuPA1–43-melittin band was cut out and determined by automated Edman degradation performed on a model PPSQ-21A protein sequencer (Shimadzu, Japan).

Inhibition effects of rhuPA1–43-melittin on growth of ovarian cancer cells

The growth and proliferation of SKOV3 ovarian carcinoma cells line was observed with MTT assay. Briefly, human ovarian cancer SKOV3 cells were maintained in H-DMEM with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 100 U/ml of penicillin/streptomycin, at 37°C in humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Cells (1×104) were seeded in 96-well plates containing complete medium and incubated for 24 h followed by different doses of rhuPA1–43-melittin for 24 h. SKOV3 were treated by H-DMEM (as control) and 5, 10, 20, 40 and 80 μg/ml rhuPA1–43-melittin, respectively. Then 20 μl MTT solution (5 mg/ml) was added to each well. After being incubated for a further 4 h at 37°C, the culture medium including MTT solution in the well was removed, and 150 μl DMSO was added to each well and mixed thoroughly to dissolve the crystals. Then the absorbance at 490 nm was detected (Bio-Rad Instruments, USA).

To test the effect of rhuPA1–43-melittin on normal cell proliferation, human breast epithelial cells HBL100 were plated as above and incubated for 24 h followed by different doses of rhuPA1–43-melittin for 24 h. HBL100 were treated by RPMI-1640 (as control) and 5, 10, 20, 40 and 80 μg/ml rhuPA1–43-melittin, respectively. MTT assay was performed as above.

Cell cycle detection

Cell cycle analysis was performed using propidium iodide staining. Briefly, the SKOV3 cells were seeded in a 6-well plate. After being treated by H-DMEM (as control) and 20, 40 and 80 μg/ml rhuPA1–43-melittin, respectively, the cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and then fixed in 70% ethanol overnight. After being washed twice in PBS, the cells were stained in propidium iodide (50 μg/ml) in the presence of 50 μg/ml RNase (DNase free) for 30 min. Flow cytometry (BD Biosciences, USA) was used to detect the cell cycle and a quantitative analysis of the cell cycle distribution was carried out using a trial version of ModFit LT V3.0 software (Verity Software House, USA). The results are expressed as percentage of the cells in each phase.

TUNEL assay for apoptosis

Apoptosis was determined by TUNEL assay. SKOV3 cells at density of 1×105 cells/well were seeded onto 1.3 mm coverslips in 24-well plates and incubated for 24 h followed by different doses of rhuPA1–43-melittin for 24 h. SKOV3 cells were treated by H-DMEM (as control), 20, 40 and 80 μg/ml rhuPA1–43-melittin respectively and the cells were fixed with freshly prepared paraformaldehyde [4% in PBS (pH 7.4)], rinsed with PBS, and incubated in permeabilization solution. TUNEL staining was performed with an in situ cell death detection kit (Bioss, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The TUNEL reaction mixture containing reaction buffer, terminal deoxynucleotidy1 transferase, and bromodeoxyuridine triphosphate was added onto the slides and incubated for 2 h at 37°C, followed by washing and incubation with an HRP-labeled anti-bromodeoxyuridine monoclonal antibody for 30 min at room temperature. The presence of antigen was then visualized with diaminobenzidine. Slides were subsequently counterstained with hematoxylin and imaged under bright-field microscopy. The number of TUNEL-positive cells was counted in six different fields and representative fields were photographed. The percentages of apoptotic cells were calculated from the ratio of apoptotic cells to total cells counted.

Results

Construction and transformation of pPICZαC-uPA1–43-melittin

Results of DNA sequence analysis of the recombinant expression vector pPICZαC-uPA1–43-melittin (data not shown) demonstrated that the DNA sequences encoding human uPA amino acids 1–43 and melittin were correctly inserted into pPICZαC vector and the amino acid sequence of uPA1–43-melittin encoding was identical with that logged in GenBank.

After being cultured at 30°C for 2 days, dozens of transformants with zeocin resistance appeared on YPD agar plates which contained 0.1 g/l zeocin. The PCR analysis of genomic DNA showed that the DNA sequence encoding human uPA amino acids 1–43 and melittin was indeed integrated into over 90% of clones which transformed with recombinant expression vector pPICZαC-uPA1–43-melittin. There were ~600 bp amplification bands for the samples that were transformed with pPICZαC-uPA1–43-melittin, however, ~400 bp for the control sample which was transformed with pPICZαC blank plasmid (Fig. 1).

Expression and detection of rhuPA1–43-melittin in P. pastoris

After induction with methanol for rhuPA1–43-melittin expression, one of the transformants which presented the highest expression level of rhuPA1–43-melittin could be used for further experiments. SDS-PAGE analysis of rhuPA1–43-melittin culture medium indicated that rhuPA1–43-melittin expressed after the induction of methanol, however, the rhuPA1–43-melittin expression in the transformant containing blank plasmids of pPICZαC was negative. Based on the amino acid sequence, the calculated molecular weight of rhuPA1–43-melittin was 7.6 kDa, which was consistent with the result of SDS-PAGE measurement (Fig. 2).

Optimized expression of rhuPA1–43-melittin in P. pastoris

The transformant that presented the highest expression level was chosen for scaled-up protein production. After a series of experiments, the optimal expression conditions of rhuPA1–43-melittin were obtained as follows: the optimal pH was 5.5 (Fig. 3a) and the optimal induction time-points was on the 4th day for the strain (Fig. 3b) at 28°C and with methanol daily addition concentration of 0.5% (v/v). Under these conditions, high level expression transformant of P. pastoris strain was obtained and retained for further studies.

The characterization of purified rhuPA1–43-melittin

The rhuPA1–43-melittin supernatant was purified with a cation exchange chromatography and a reverse phase chromatography. Using an AKTA Explorer 100 chromatography system, we optimized the purification parameters. The optimal concentration of NaCl for elution was 0.6 M and 100% methanol (containing 0.1% TFA) can elute the bound rhuPA1–43-melittin from the reverse phase chromatographic column (Fig. 4a). The concise purification protocol of rhuPA1–43-melittin is presented in Table I.

Table I

Purification process of rhuPA1–43-melittin.

Table I

Purification process of rhuPA1–43-melittin.

Purification stepsTotal protein (mg)rhApoC-I (mg)Recovery (%)Purity (%)
Supenatant1289675
SP Sepharose XL937881.383.0
Vivaflow 200766971.990.8
Source 30 RPC706668.994.2

The primary purified recombinant protein was identified by western blot analysis. The results demonstrated that the recombinant protein could bind with murine anti-human urokinase monoclonal antibody. No band was observed in lane 1, which is the supernatant before adding methanol (Fig. 4b).

N-terminal sequencing of rhuPA1–43-melittin offered the first 14 amino acids as S N E L H Q V P S N C D C L. The N-terminal sequence of rhuPA1–43-melittin was identical to that of human uPA, confirming the successful expression and purification of rhuPA1–43-melittin.

Anticancer effects of rhuPA1–43-melittin

After being treated with rhuPA1–43-melittin at different doses, some SKOV3 cells showed membrane blebbing, ballooning and chromatin condensation. However, the cells grew well with adherence and the cells were fusiform or diamond shaped in the control group. MTT assay was used to detect the quantity of cells. As a result, rhuPA1–43-melittin treatment brought about a dose-dependent inhibition of growth on SKOV3 at 24 h. The inhibition rate is ~84% at the dose of 80 μg/ml (Fig. 5). However, the result (Fig. 5) showed that rhuPA1–43-melittin did not have much influence on the proliferation of normal cells (HBL100). The reason is that uPAR is highly expressed in ovarian cancer SKOV3 cells, but it is undetectable in normal cells such as HBL100. In other words, the anticancer effect of rhuPA1–43-melittin can be exerted when uPA1–43 combines with its receptor-uPAR followed by the release of melittin. So the fusion protein we expressed has no obvious toxicity on normal tissues and it can be applied to ovarian cancer targeted therapy.

To examine whether rhuPA1–43-melittin that induced growth inhibition was associated with cell cycle regulation, the cell cycle distribution was analyzed by flow cytometry. After SKOV3 cells were incubated with rhuPA1–43-melittin for 24 h, cells were harvested and further prepared for cell cycle analysis. Of the SKOV3 cells 41.95% was in the G1 phase under normal growth conditions, while treatment of SKOV3 cells with 20, 40 and 80 μg/ml rhuPA1–43-melittin resulted in 47.85, 58.61 and 70.75% of cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, respectively (Fig. 6). These results indicate that rhuPA1–43-melittin may induce G1 phase cell cycle arrest of SKOV3 cells.

The TUNEL assay demonstrated that ovarian cancer cells underwent apoptosis after treatment with rhuPA1–43-melittin. Data from all designated fields were pooled to obtain the apoptotic index, which is the percentage of TUNEL positive cells in total cells manually counted in 6 random fields. The apoptosis index of rhuPA1–43-melittin treatment groups were remarkably increased compared with the normal control group (P<0.001). As a result, rhuPA1–43-melittin treatment caused a dose-dependent increase of apoptosis in SKOV3 within 24 h (Fig. 7).

Discussion

The difficulty of complete resection caused by intra-abdominal dissemination and acquired resistance to platinum-based drugs during cyclic chemotherapy has been reported as the main reason for high mortality rate of advanced ovarian cancer (19). Therefore, it has become essential to introduce new therapeutic modalities that may benefit the patients.

Melittin is an attractive anticancer candidate because of its wide-spectrum lytic properties. Although cytotoxic to broad spectrum of tumor cells, the peptide is also toxic to normal cells and its therapeutic potential cannot be achieved without a proper delivery vehicle (20).

The present study focused on expression of a target fusion protein-rhuPA1–43-melittin which can be used in ovarian cancer targeted therapy. Taking uPA1–43 amino acids specifically binding to uPAR as targeted part of fusion protein and making use of antitumor activity of melittin, the recombinant fusion protein was able to inhibit invasion and metastasis of ovarian tumor and to be applied for effective targeted treatment.

In this study, uPA1–43-melittin-pPICZαC eukaryotic expression vector was constructed. After being transformed into P. pastoris and induced by methanol, rhuPA1–43-melittin was detected on the basis of SDS-PAGE and western blot analysis. We established a stable and effective rhuPA1–43-melittin P. pastoris expression system. The proteins of P. pastoris itself are seldom secreted into the culture medium, and the target protein is easy to be purified and free of problems such as endotoxin pollution (21). Thus, it is possible to establish a solid foundation for large-scale fermentation in the future.

Cell proliferation assay showed that rhuPA1–43-melittin could inhibit growth of SKOV3 and had no cytotoxicity on normal cells. Cell cycle arrest and apoptosis are two important mechanisms involved in anticancer drug treatment. The cell cycle plays an important role in cell fate, including cell replication, cell death, and cell function. To explore the underlying mechanism by which rhuPA1–43-melittin inhibits SKOV3 cells growth, we determined the cell cycle progression of SKOV3 cells after the treatment with rhuPA1–43-melittin for 24 h. Our results demonstrated that treatment of SKOV3 cells with rhuPA1–43-melittin induced cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase, indicating that one of the mechanisms by which rhuPA1–43-melittin inhibits the proliferation of SKOV3 cells is through inhibition of cell cycle progression. TUNEL assay revealed that rhuPA1–43-melittin induced apoptosis of SKOV3 cells. In conclusion, with rhuPA1–43-melittin, it is possible to induce cell cycle arrest, growth inhibition and apoptosis in SKOV3 cells and this study offers the early-stage experimental basis for further study on treatment of ovarian cancer with rhuPA1–43-melittin.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81272875, 30973187 and 81302242), the Foundation of Ministry of Education of China for Young Scholars (20110061120084), Jilin Science and Technology Funds (20110755, 20120957 and 20130102094JC, 20140204022YY), basic scientific research of Jilin University Funds and Young Scholars Program of Norman Bethune Health Science Center of Jilin University (20142116).

Abbreviations:

uPA

urokinase plasminogen activator

uPAR

urokinase plasminogen activator receptor

ATF

amino-terminal fragment

EGF-domain

epidermal growth factor-like domain

GPI

glycosylphosphatidylinositol

rhuPA1–43-melittin

recombinant human uPA1–43-melittin

pBs

plasmid Bluescript II

YPD

yeast extract peptone dextrose

TFA

trifluoroacetic acid

DAB

3,3′-diaminobenzidine

ELISA

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

FBS

fetal bovine serum

PBS

phosphate-buffered saline

OPD

ortho-phenylenediamine

References

1 

Thummarati P, Wijitburaphat S, Prasopthum A, Menakongka A, Sripa B, Tohtong R and Suthiphongchai T: High level of urokinase plasminogen activator contributes to cholangiocarcinoma invasion and metastasis. World J Gastroenterol. 18:244–250. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Lee DH, Yang Y, Lee SJ, Kim KY, Koo TH, Shin SM, Song KS, Lee YH, Kim YJ, Lee JJ, Choi I and Lee JH: Macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 induces the invasiveness of gastric cancer cells by up-regulating the urokinase-type plasminogen activator system. Cancer Res. 63:4648–4655. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

3 

Blasi F and Carmeliet P: uPAR: a versatile signalling orchestrator. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 3:932–943. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

de Bock CE and Wang Y: Clinical significance of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) expression in cancer. Med Res Rev. 24:13–39. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Andreasen PA, Egelund R and Petersen HH: The plasminogen activation system in tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 57:25–40. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Stepanova VV and Tkachuk VA: Urokinase as a multidomain protein and polyfunctional cell regulator. Biochemistry (Mosc). 67:109–118. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Botkjaer KA, Deryugina EI, Dupont DM, Gårdsvoll H, Bekes EM, Thuesen CK, Chen Z, Ploug M, Quigley JP and Andreasen PA: Targeting tumor cell invasion and dissemination in vivo by an aptamer that inhibits urokinase-type plasminogen activator through a novel multifunctional mechanism. Mol Cancer Res. 10:1532–1543. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Ballance DJ, Marshall JM, Cottingham IR, Steven J, Berry SJ, Cederholm-Williams SA, Goodey AR and Courtney M: A hybrid protein of urokinase growth-factor domain and plasminogen-activator inhibitor type 2 inhibits urokinase activity and binds to the urokinase receptor. Eur J Biochem. 207:177–183. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Rabbani SA, Mazar AP, Bernier SM, Haq M, Bolivar I, Henkin J and Goltzman D: Structural requirements for the growth factor activity of the amino-terminal domain of urokinase. J Biol Chem. 267:14151–14156. 1992.PubMed/NCBI

10 

Solberg H, Ploug M, Høyer-Hansen G, Nielsen BS and Lund LR: The murine receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator is primarily expressed in tissues actively undergoing remodeling. J Histochem Cytochem. 49:237–246. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Li H, Ye X, Mahanivong C, Bian D, Chun J and Huang S: Signaling mechanisms responsible for lysophosphatidic acid-induced urokinase plasminogen activator expression in ovarian cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 280:10564–10571. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Ljuca D, Fatusić Z, Iljazović E and Ahmetović B: Monitoring of chemotherapy successfulness of platina/taxol chemotherapy protocol by using determination of serum urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) in patients with ovarian carcinoma FIGO II and III stage. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 7:111–116. 2007.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Kotzsch M, Bernt K, Friedrich K, Luther E, Albrecht S, Gatzweiler A, Magdolen V, Baretton G, Zietz C and Luther T: Prognostic relevance of tumour cell-associated uPAR expression in invasive ductal breast carcinoma. Histopathology. 57:461–471. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Ulisse S, Baldini E, Sorrenti S and D’Armiento M: The urokinase plasminogen activator system: a target for anticancer therapy. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 9:32–71. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Shin JM, Jeong YJ, Cho HJ, Park KK, Chung IK, Lee IK, Kwak JY, Chang HW, Kim CH, Moon SK, Kim WJ, Choi YH and Chang YC: Melittin suppresses HIF-1α/VEGF expression through inhibition of ERK and mTOR/p70S6K pathway in human cervical carcinoma cells. PLoS One. 8:e693802013. View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Li B, Gu W, Zhang C, Huang XQ, Han KQ and Ling CQ: Growth arrest and apoptosis of the human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line BEL-7402 induced by melittin. Onkologie. 29:367–371. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Orsolić N, Sver L, Verstovsek S, Terzić S and Basić I: Inhibition of mammary carcinoma cell proliferation in vitro and tumor growth in vivo by bee venom. Toxicon. 41:861–870. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar

18 

Raghuraman H and Chattopadhyay A: Melittin: a membrane-active peptide with diverse functions. Biosci Rep. 27:189–223. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Tang J, Li J, Zeng G, Tang Y, Tian W, He J, York JP and Xia X: Antisense oligonucleotide suppression of human IGF-1R inhibits the growth and survival of in vitro cultured epithelial ovarian cancer cells. J Ovarian Res. 6:712013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Gajski G and Garaj-Vrhovac V: Melittin: a lytic peptide with anticancer properties. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 36:697–705. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Gurkan C and Ellar DJ: Recombinant production of bacterial toxins and their derivatives in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. Microb Cell Fact. 4:332005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

February-2015
Volume 46 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1019-6439
Online ISSN:1791-2423

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Su M, Chang W, Cui M, Lin Y, Wu S and Xu T: Expression and anticancer activity analysis of recombinant human uPA1‑43-melittin. Int J Oncol 46: 619-626, 2015.
APA
Su, M., Chang, W., Cui, M., Lin, Y., Wu, S., & Xu, T. (2015). Expression and anticancer activity analysis of recombinant human uPA1‑43-melittin. International Journal of Oncology, 46, 619-626. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2014.2750
MLA
Su, M., Chang, W., Cui, M., Lin, Y., Wu, S., Xu, T."Expression and anticancer activity analysis of recombinant human uPA1‑43-melittin". International Journal of Oncology 46.2 (2015): 619-626.
Chicago
Su, M., Chang, W., Cui, M., Lin, Y., Wu, S., Xu, T."Expression and anticancer activity analysis of recombinant human uPA1‑43-melittin". International Journal of Oncology 46, no. 2 (2015): 619-626. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2014.2750