Feasibility study of the Fab fragment of a monoclonal antibody against tissue factor as a diagnostic tool

  • Authors:
    • Ryo Tsumura
    • Ryuta Sato
    • Fumiaki Furuya
    • Yoshikatsu Koga
    • Yoshiyuki Yamamoto
    • Yuki Fujiwara
    • Masahiro Yasunaga
    • Yasuhiro Matsumura
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: October 19, 2015     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2015.3210
  • Pages: 2107-2114
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Tissue factor (TF) is expressed strongly in various types of cancer, especially cancers that are often refractory to treatment, such as pancreatic cancer. In this study, we compared the differences in the biophysical and pharmacological properties of whole IgG and the Fab fragment of anti-human TF monoclonal antibody (1849 antibodies), in order to determine their suitability for application in the diagnosis and treatment of cancers. In the biophysical examination, we investigated the characteristics of 1849-whole IgG and 1849-Fab by SPR sensing and confocal fluorescence microscopy analysis using recombinant human TF antigen and TF-overexpressing human pancreatic cancer cell line, BxPC3, respectively. After conjugation with Alexa-Flour-647, in vivo imaging was conducted in mice bearing BxPC3 xenograft tumors. Furthermore, the distribution of the conjugates in tumors and major organs was evaluated by ex vivo study. The in vitro experiments showed that 1849 antibodies had high affinity against TF antigen. In addition, 1849-Fab showed a faster dissociation rate from the antigen than 1849-whole IgG. In mice, 1849-Fab-Alexa-Flour-647 showed rapid renal clearance and faster tumor accumulation, achieving a high contrast signal over nearby normal tissues in the early phase and enhanced tumor penetration after administration. On the other hand, 1849-whole IgG-Alexa-Flour-647 showed slow clearance from the blood and sustained high tumor accumulation. These results suggest that 1849-Fab may be a useful tool for pancreatic cancer diagnosis.

Introduction

Of all clinical cancers, pancreatic cancer has one of the poorest prognoses, with an overall 5-year survival rate of ~6% (1). Therefore, detection of the tumor and its micrometastases at an early stage, curative resectability of the tumor, and development of effective drugs for its treatment are desired.

In present diagnostics, several non-invasive imaging technologies, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and computed tomography (CT) are available for clinical use (2). To discriminate the tumor from normal tissues, several monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based probes have been developed by exploiting tumor-specific molecules. MAbs have also been used to treat some types of cancer (e.g., malignant lymphoma, breast cancer) (3,4). Moreover, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), by which an anticancer drug as a payload is preferentially delivered to the tumor tissue with minimal adverse effects, are under development. Thus, mAbs with high and specific affinity for tumor antigens are potentially excellent tools for cancer diagnosis and treatment.

It is well-known that cancer invasion is accompanied by an activation of blood coagulation (5). Recently, several clinical studies have revealed that cancer patients are at a high risk for the development of thrombosis (6). Hemorrhage from the tumor vessels by the invading tumor cells and subsequent fibrin clot formation to stop the bleeding occur repeatedly in tumor tissues (7). Moreover, this state lasts in solid tumor tissues for as long as the tumor cells survive in the body (7). Tissue factor (TF) is a 47-kDa transmembrane glycoprotein that is known to initiate the extrinsic coagulation cascade and to play a critical role in hemostasis. Therefore, it is conceivable that high expression levels of TF may be one of the major causes of the hypercoagulable state in tumors. TF is well known to be expressed at high levels in many types of solid tumors, such as pancreatic cancer, glioma, colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer and breast cancer (810). TF is also known to be expressed in the tumor stromal cells (1113). Some studies have indicated that activation of TF signaling in tumor cells enhances tumor growth, metastasis, inflammation and angiogenesis (1418). Furthermore, TF expression has been shown to be correlated with a poor prognosis in patients with cancer (1922).

We hypothesized that TF may be a promising target for imaging probes or delivery of anticancer drugs into tumor tissues, e.g., pancreatic tumor tissues. We and other groups have already reported the usefulness of anti-TF mAb in cancer imaging and therapy, including the Fab and scFv fragments (2329). However, the optimum size as a molecular probe has not been fully evaluated from the perspective of biochemical characteristics and bio-distribution within the tumor tissue.

In the present study, we prepared an anti-TF mAb and its Fab fragment, and investigated their biochemical and pharmacological characteristics in vitro and in vivo, in order to determine their suitability for application in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

Materials and methods

Antibodies and cell line

We developed the clone 1849 rat mAb IgG2b which reacts with human TF antigen but not with mouse TF antigen. As an isotype control antibody, we also developed clone 372 rat mAb IgG2b which did not react with human and mouse TF antigens (30). The human pancreatic cancer cell line BxPC3 was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). The cell line was maintained in RPMI-1640 medium (Wako, Osaka, Japan) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) and 100 U/ml of penicillin G, 100 μg/ml of streptomycin, and 0.25 μg/ml of amphotericin B (Wako) in a 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C.

Generation of the Fab fragment

The 1849 and control mAbs were digested with papain (Worthington Biochemical, Freehold, NJ, USA) at a protein/enzyme ratio of 250:1, in a reaction buffer containing 100 mM sodium phosphate, 2 mM EDTA, and 10 mM Cysteine-HCl, pH 7.0, for 2 h at 37°C. The reaction buffer was then changed to 5 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH7.5) for removing Cysteine-HCl using Amicon Ultra (Merck-Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). The 1849-Fab and control-Fab were purified in a CHT ceramic hydroxyapatite column using a salt concentration gradient (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Purity of the antibodies

The purity of the antibodies was evaluated by SDS-PAGE and Bioanalyzer analysis (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) under non-reducing conditions. In SDS-PAGE, the samples were loaded (2 μg/lane) on a 4–15% polyacrylamide gradient gel (Bio-Rad). The gel was then stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 and scanned with ChemiDoc XRS+ (Bio-Rad). The purity and molecular size of the antibodies were measured using an Agilent bioanalyzer, as prescribed in the manual, using the Agilent Protein 230 kit.

Particle size determination and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) analysis

Particle size was determined using DelsaNano HC (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) on the basis of photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS) and dynamic light scattering (DLS). Biacore T200 (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) was used to assess the binding of the 1849 antibodies to recombinant human TF (rhTF) antigen. Following standard amine chemistry protocols, rhTF antigen was diluted to 1 μg/ml in 10 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) and immobilized on the CM5 sensor chips (GE Healthcare) at lower density (17.7 resonance units) to only allow monovalent binding. We used the single-cycle kinetics to measure the affinity of the antibodies. Antibodies in PBS were passed over the sensor chips, and the interactions were monitored for 30 sec. The sensor surface was washed with PBS to detect dissociation and then regenerated with 10 mM Glycine-HCl (pH 1.5) at the end of each experiment.

Antibody labeling

The 1849-whole IgG, 1849-Fab, control-whole IgG and control-Fab were chemically labeled with the fluorescent dyes Alexa-Fluor-647 (AF647, Invitrogen, Eugene, OR, USA), according to the manufacturer's protocol (MP 00143, Amine-Reactive Probes, Invitrogen). Following the labeling reaction, the antibody concentration and degree of labeling were measured by determining the absorbance values at 280 nm and 650 nm with a Nano Drop ND-1000 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA).

The final concentration of the antibodies-AF647 was 1.0 mg/ml, and the final dye molarities of 1849-whole IgG-AF647, 1849-Fab-AF647, control-whole IgG-AF647 and control-Fab-AF647 were 19.5, 18.2, 21.9 and 21.5 μM, respectively.

Confocal fluorescence microscopy analysis

BxPC3 cells were planted on BD Falcon 4-well chamber slide at 1×105 cells/well. After 24 h of incubation, cells were incubated with 500 μl of RPMI medium containing 0.1 μM 1849-whole IgG-AF647, 1849-Fab-AF647, control-whole IgG-AF647 or control-Fab-AF647 for 1 h at 37°C. Cells were washed three times with PBS, then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min at RT and stained with DAPI solution (1 μg/ml) for 5 min at RT. The slides were covered with Fluoromount-G (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL, USA). Fluorescence images were obtained with a fluorescence microscope, BIOREVO BZ9000 (Keyence, Osaka, Japan).

Flow cytometric analysis

The cell-binding activities of the antibodies-AF647 to BxPC3 cells were evaluated by flow cytometry. Briefly, BxPC3 cells were harvested and suspended in PBS with 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Wako) and 2 mM EDTA (B.E.PBS) at a density of 4×105 cells/ml. The BxPC3 cells were then incubated with the antibodies-AF647 at each concentration (1, 10 and 100 μM) for 30 min on ice, and washed three times with B.E.PBS. Subsequently, propidium iodide (0.4 μl/ml; PI, Invitrogen) was added, and the cell binding activities were analyzed with the guava easyCyte (Millipore) using FlowJo analysis software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA). As a negative control, we added the fraction containing PI and not the antibodies-AF647.

Animal models

Four-week-old female BALB/c nude mice were purchased from SLC Japan (Shizuoka, Japan). A week later, the mice were inoculated subcutaneously in the right flank with 1×106 BxPC3 cells suspended in 100 μl PBS. The test antibodies were injected intravenously into the tail vein of the mice when the tumor volume reached ~100–150 mm3, as measured with calipers, and calculated by the formula: volume = length × (width)2 × 1/2. All animal procedures and experiments were conducted with the approval of the Committee for Animal Experimentation of the National Cancer Center, Japan. These guidelines meet the ethical standards required by law and also comply with the guidelines for the use of experimental animals in Japan.

In vivo and ex vivo fluorescence imaging

In vivo and ex vivo fluorescence imaging were performed using IVIS Kinetic imaging system and analyzed using IVIS Living Imaging 3.0 software (Caliper Life Sciences, Hopkinton, MA, USA). A filter set (excitation at 605 nm, emission at 640 nm) was used for acquiring the fluorescence of the AF647 conjugated antibodies. All fluorescence images were acquired in identical illumination settings and normalized as photons per second per centimeter square per steradian (p/s/cm2/sr). Quantitative data were obtained from ROI (regions of interest) analysis of the fluorescence images. The mice were injected with ~100 μg of antibodies-AF647 via the tail vein in both studies.

In vivo imaging was performed at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 24 and 72 h post-injection. The mean fluorescence intensity of the left flank region, on the side contralateral to the tumor, was used as the background value in order to investigate the tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) of 1849-whole IgG-AF647 and 1849-Fab-AF647. The TBR was determined as the mean fluorescence intensity of the tumor divided by the mean background intensity. Statistical analysis were performed using Student's t-test. P-values of <0.05 and <0.01 were considered statistically significant. In the ex vivo study, the mice were euthanized at 1, 3, 6, 24 and 72 h post-injection, followed by excision of the tumor and major organs from the mice. The tumor and the major organs, excluding blood, were washed with PBS and placed on a dish with no fluorescence intensity in the measurement range. The mean fluorescence intensity of the tumor and major organs obtained from the mice which were not injected with antibodies was used as the background value.

Distribution of antibodies

In the distribution study of antibodies, the mice were injected with ~300 μg of 1849-whole IgG-AF647 and 1849-Fab-AF647 via the tail vein. The mice were euthanized under deep anesthesia at 3 h after the injection, and the tumors were excised. The tumors were then embedded in Tissue-Tec optimal-cutting-temperature compound (Sakura Finetek, Tokyo, Japan) and frozen at −80°C until use. Frozen sections, 6-μm-think, of the tumors were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min at RT and blocked with 5% skim milk in PBS for 1 h at RT. The sections were then incubated with goat anti-mouse CD31 polyclonal antibody (2 μg/ml; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) for 1 h at RT, and then with AF555 conjugated anti-goat polyclonal antibody (4 μg/ml; Invitrogen) for 1 h at RT. Subsequently, the sections were stained with DAPI solution (1 μg/ml) for 5 min at RT and the slides were covered with Fluoromount-G. Fluorescence images were obtained with BIOREVO BZ9000.

Results

Generation and purity of the antibodies

Fig. 1A shows a schematic diagram of production of the Fab fragment from the whole IgG. The Fab fragments were visualized as an almost single band on SDS-PAGE, which indicated the high purity of the fragments (Fig. 1B). The results of the bioanalyzer analysis also confirmed the high purity (Fig. 1C–F).

Biochemical characteristics of the antibodies

The particle sizes of the antibodies were correlated with their molecular weights (Table I). There were no significant differences in the molecular weight between 1849-whole IgG and control-whole IgG, or 1849-Fab and control-Fab. In the SPR analysis, while the association rate constant (Ka) values of 1849-whole IgG and 1849-Fab were almost the same, the dissociation rate constant (Kd) value of 1849-Fab was ~4.2-fold higher than that of 1849-whole IgG (Table I). Consequently, the binding affinity constant (KD) value of 1849-Fab was ~5.5-fold higher than that of the 1849-whole IgG because of high dissociation.

Table I

Particle size and binding parameters of antibodies.

Table I

Particle size and binding parameters of antibodies.

Particle size (nm)KD (M)Ka (1/Ms)Kd (1/s)
1849 whole IgG13.1±4.6 3.665×10−10 3.770×104 1.382×10−5
1849 Fab5.0±2.4 2.001×10−9 2.895×104 5.795×10−5
Control whole IgG13.0±4.8N/AN/AN/A
Control Fab5.5±1.8N/AN/AN/A

[i] The particle size is shown as the mean ± standard deviation. N/A showed no data.

Confocal fluorescence microscopy analysis revealed that 1849-whole IgG-AF647 and 1849-Fab-AF647 bound to the membrane of BxPC3 cells and internalized into cells through TF antigen on the membrane (Fig. 2A). On the other hand, control-whole IgG-AF647 and control-Fab-AF647 did not bind to the BxPC3 cells. Flow cytometric analysis confirmed a high affinity of 1849-antibodies-AF647 to BxPC3 cells depending on the concentration (Fig. 2B).

In vivo imaging

The biodistribution and tumor targeting efficacy of each of the antibodies-AF647 were measured in mice bearing BxPC3 tumors by our in vivo imaging system (Fig. 3A–C). At all time-points, both 1849-whole IgG-AF647 and 1849-Fab-AF647 showed notably higher tumor accumulation than control antibodies-AF647. The tumor accumulation of 1849-whole IgG-AF647 reached its peak at 24 h after the injection, whereas that of 1849-Fab-AF647 reached its maximum at 1 h after the injection. Both 1849-Fab-AF647 and control-Fab-AF647 showed high distribution into the kidneys in the early phase. Based on these fluorescence images, the TBR values of 1849-whole IgG-AF647 and 1849-Fab-AF647 were determined at all the time-points examined (Fig. 3D). The TBRs of 1849-whole IgG-AF647 and 1849-Fab-AF647 reached their maximum at 24 and 12 h after the injection, respectively. The TBR of 1849-Fab-AF647 was higher than that of 1849-whole IgG-AF647 at any time-points within 12 h after the injection (3 and 6 h, P<0.05. 9 h, P<0.01). On the other hand, the TBR of 1849-whole IgG-AF647 was higher than that of 1849-Fab-AF647 at any time-points after 24 h (Fig. 3D).

Ex vivo studies

The accumulation of antibodies-AF647 into the tumors was almost consistent with those observed by in vivo fluorescence imaging (Fig. 4A). The blood, liver and heart, the tissue-to-background ratios of 1849-whole IgG-AF647 were higher than those of 1849-Fab-AF647 (Fig. 4B, C and G), while the kidney tissue-to-background ratio was notably higher for 1849-Fab-AF647 than for 1849-whole IgG-AF647 at all time-points (Fig. 4D). Moreover, the uptake and distribution of these antibodies in other normal tissues such as the lung, spleen and muscle were significantly low (Fig. 4E, F and H).

Distribution of the antibodies in the tumor tissues

To analyze the intratumoral distribution of 1849-whole IgG-AF647 and 1849-Fab-AF647, immunofluorescence staining was performed (Fig. 5). At 3 h after the injection, the fluorescence intensity of 1849-Fab-AF647 in the BxPC3 tumor tissue was higher than that of 1849-whole IgG-AF647. This result was consistent with both the results of the in vivo fluorescence imaging and ex vivo study. In addition, there was a clear difference in intratumoral distribution between 1849-whole IgG-AF647 and 1849-Fab-AF647. 1849-whole IgG-AF647 was localized mainly in the periphery of the tumor cell clusters, while 1849-Fab-AF647 penetrated into the center of the tumor clusters.

Discussion

A large body of basic and clinical studies has shown overexpression of TF in various types of solid tumor tissues (810). We hypothesized that TF might therefore be a promising target for cancer diagnosis and therapy and developed a rat mAb (clone 1849) against human TF.

The purpose of this study was to characterize 1849-whole IgG and 1849-Fab in vitro and in vivo, in order to clarify the suitability of their application for diagnostic or therapeutic purpose, which would enhance the potential of their application to clinical studies. We used a mouse xenograft model of human pancreatic cancer as the TF-overexpressing tumor.

First, SPR analysis showed that 1849-Fab could dissociate from antigen more rapidly than 1849-whole IgG (Table I). Although rhTF antigen was coated to the chip at lower density, this result is explained by the presence in 1849-whole IgG of two antigen-binding sites, so one Fab-arm can still bind the antigen even if the other is detached, in contrast to only one site in 1849-Fab. Confocal fluorescence microscopy analysis and Flow cytometric analysis showed that 1849-antibodies-AF647 had a high affinity and specificity to the TF antigen expressed in BxPC3 cells.

In the in vivo imaging study, the 1849 antibodies-AF647 showed higher accumulation in the tumors at all-time-points as compared to control antibodies having passive targeting which depends on the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect (31). It was clear that the EPR effect combined with the active targeting against human TF antigen contributed to the high tumor accumulation of 1849 antibodies as compared to that of control isotype IgG. Furthermore, the in vivo imaging showed that the kinetics of whole IgG and Fab changed due to the differences of their molecular sizes and affinities. In the presence of the Fc domain, both 1849-whole IgG-AF647 and control-whole IgG-AF647 showed prolonged systemic circulation in the body (32). The property of IgG of having a high molecular weight (150 kDa), above the renal clearance threshold of ~65 kDa, permits it to escape renal clearance, which facilitates prolonged circulation (33). In the imaging using whole IgG, the prolonged circulation time causes a sustained high background signal. On the other hand, because Fab lacks the Fc domain and is smaller in size (~50 kDa), Fab can pass through the renal glomeruli, resulting in rapid clearance from the body and a low background signal. Moreover, the tumor signal intensity of 1849-Fab-AF647 appeared to reach its peak immediately after the injection, whereas that of 1849-whole IgG-AF647 reached its peak at about 20 h after the injection. These properties led to the differences in the TBR between 1849-whole IgG-AF647 and 1849-Fab-AF647, namely, a maximum peak of 1849-whole IgG-AF647 at 24 h and of 1849-Fab-AF647 at 12 h after the injection. The results of the in vivo imaging were confirmed by the results of the ex vivo study. In brief, 1849-Fab-AF647 showed rapid tumor accumulation and rapid blood clearance, whereas in contrast, 1849-whole IgG-AF647 showed sustained high tumor accumulation and prolonged circulation in the blood. This study also showed that 1849-whole IgG-AF647 and 1849-Fab-AF647 were mainly excreted by the liver and kidney, respectively.

The present immunofluorescence staining study showed that 1849-Fab-AF647 penetration was deeper into the tumors than 1849-whole IgG-AF647. It was clear that the smaller size of 1849-Fab-AF647 allowed more efficient tumor penetration. In the histological examination, the BxPC3 cells at the tumor front showed stronger TF expression than those in the central region (30). Because the 1849-whole IgG-AF647 with its high affinity for the antigen may be trapped and kept by TF-overexpressing cells at the tumor front, it hardly penetrates into the tumor center at the early phase. On the other hand, 1849-Fab-AF647, with its fast dissociation rate and low internalization efficiency, may be able to penetrate the tumor center more easily (34). Although it is recognized that homogeneous penetration of the imaging probe is less important than achieving a high TBR value (35), improved tumor penetration would increase the sensitivity of detection of small-sized tumors or micrometastases.

In conclusion, the properties of 1849-Fab, namely, fast dissociation from TF antigen, rapid tumor accumulation, efficient tumor penetration, and rapid body clearance make it potentially suitable for diagnostic applications. A diagnostic test with the Fab probe would provide a high contrast and fine tumor imaging within half a day. Fab can also minimize several of the adverse effects (e.g., hypersensitivity) of whole IgG. In addition, it allows use of a short-half-life radionuclide (e.g., 99mTc, half-life 6 h) (36), which can shorten the scan time and reduce the total body radiation dose. These features would benefit both outpatients and healthy people as the target populations for diagnostic application. On the other hand, the properties of 1849-whole IgG, namely, high avidity, high tumor accumulation and prolonged biological half-life, make it more suitable for therapeutic applications. We thus propose the importance of the developmental strategy of selecting a suitable antibody depending on whether the intended application is diagnostic or therapeutic. For clinical application of our 1849 antibodies, further investigation, i.e., PET or SPECT imaging for diagnostic application and ADC for therapeutic application using an appropriate experimental tumor model with high TF expression and abundant tumor stroma, is needed.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) through the Funding Program for World-Leading Innovative R&D on Science and Technology (FIRST Program) initiated by the Council for Science and Technology Policy (CSTP) (to Y. Matsumura) and the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (23-A-45 to Y. Matsumura). We thank Mrs. M. Kanzaki for supporting the animal experiments and Ms. M. Nakayama for secretarial help.

Abbreviations:

MRI

magnetic resonance imaging

PET

positron emission tomography

SPECT

single photon emission computed tomography

CT

computed tomography

mAb

monoclonal antibody

ADCs

antibody-drug conjugates

TF

tissue factor

SPR

surface Plasmon resonance

PCS

photon correlation spectroscopy

DLS

dynamic light scattering

TBR ratio

tumor-to background ratio

Ka

the association rate constant

Kd

the dissociation rate constant

KD

the binding affinity constant

EPR effect

enhanced permeability and retention effect

References

1 

Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Garshell J, Neyman N, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, et al: National Cancer Institute: SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2010. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2010/. Accessed June 14, 2013

2 

Kaur S, Venktaraman G, Jain M, Senapati S, Garg PK and Batra SK: Recent trends in antibody-based oncologic imaging. Cancer Lett. 315:97–111. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar :

3 

Verma S, Miles D, Gianni L, Krop IE, Welslau M, Baselga J, Pegram M, Oh DY, Diéras V, Guardino E, et al; EMILIA Study Group. Trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 367:1783–1791. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Ricart AD and Tolcher AW: Technology insight: Cytotoxic drug immunoconjugates for cancer therapy. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 4:245–255. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

5 

Rickles FR, Levine M and Edwards RL: Hemostatic alterations in cancer patients. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 11:237–248. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Stein PD, Beemath A, Meyers FA, Skaf E, Sanchez J and Olson RE: Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients hospitalized with cancer. Am J Med. 119:60–68. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Matsumura Y: Cancer stromal targeting (CAST) therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 64:710–719. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Callander NS, Varki N and Rao LV: Immunohistochemical identification of tissue factor in solid tumors. Cancer. 70:1194–1201. 1992. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Kasthuri RS, Taubman MB and Mackman N: Role of tissue factor in cancer. J Clin Oncol. 27:4834–4838. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

van den Berg YW, Osanto S, Reitsma PH and Versteeg HH: The relationship between tissue factor and cancer progression: Insights from bench and bedside. Blood. 119:924–932. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Contrino J, Hair G, Kreutzer DL and Rickles FR: In situ detection of tissue factor in vascular endothelial cells: Correlation with the malignant phenotype of human breast disease. Nat Med. 2:209–215. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Vrana JA, Stang MT, Grande JP and Getz MJ: Expression of tissue factor in tumor stroma correlates with progression to invasive human breast cancer: Paracrine regulation by carcinoma cell-derived members of the transforming growth factor beta family. Cancer Res. 56:5063–5070. 1996.PubMed/NCBI

13 

Ueno T, Toi M, Koike M, Nakamura S and Tominaga T: Tissue factor expression in breast cancer tissues: Its correlation with prognosis and plasma concentration. Br J Cancer. 83:164–170. 2000.PubMed/NCBI

14 

Versteeg HH and Ruf W: Emerging insights in tissue factor-dependent signaling events. Semin Thromb Hemost. 32:24–32. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Langer F and Bokemeyer C: Crosstalk between cancer and haemostasis. Implications for cancer biology and cancer-associated thrombosis with focus on tissue factor. Hamostaseologie. 32:95–104. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Khorana AA, Ahrendt SA, Ryan CK, Francis CW, Hruban RH, Hu YC, Hostetter G, Harvey J and Taubman MB: Tissue factor expression, angiogenesis, and thrombosis in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 13:2870–2875. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Milsom CC, Yu JL, Mackman N, Micallef J, Anderson GM, Guha A and Rak JW: Tissue factor regulation by epidermal growth factor receptor and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions: Effect on tumor initiation and angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 68:10068–10076. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Hjortoe GM, Petersen LC, Albrektsen T, Sorensen BB, Norby PL, Mandal SK, Pendurthi UR and Rao LV: Tissue factor-factor VIIa-specific up-regulation of IL-8 expression in MDA-MB-231 cells is mediated by PAR-2 and results in increased cell migration. Blood. 103:3029–3037. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Regina S, Valentin JB, Lachot S, Lemarié E, Rollin J and Gruel Y: Increased tissue factor expression is associated with reduced survival in non-small cell lung cancer and with mutations of TP53 and PTEN. Clin Chem. 55:1834–1842. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Yamashita H, Kitayama J, Ishikawa M and Nagawa H: Tissue factor expression is a clinical indicator of lymphatic metastasis and poor prognosis in gastric cancer with intestinal phenotype. J Surg Oncol. 95:324–331. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

21 

Kaido T, Oe H, Yoshikawa A, Mori A, Arii S and Imamura M: Tissue factor is a useful prognostic factor of recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma in 5-year survivors. Hepatogastroenterology. 52:1383–1387. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

22 

Nitori N, Ino Y, Nakanishi Y, Yamada T, Honda K, Yanagihara K, Kosuge T, Kanai Y, Kitajima M and Hirohashi S: Prognostic significance of tissue factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 11:2531–2539. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Sato R, Obonai T, Tsumura R, Tsumoto K, Koga Y, Yasunaga M and Matsumura Y: Preparation and characterization of anti-tissue factor single-chain variable fragment antibody for cancer diagnosis. Cancer Sci. 105:1631–1637. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Koga Y, Manabe S, Aihara Y, Sato R, Tsumura R, Iwafuji H, Furuya F, Fuchigami H, Fujiwara Y, Hisada Y, et al: Antitumor effect of antitissue factor antibody-MMAE conjugate in human pancreatic tumor xenografts. Int J Cancer. Feb 20–2015.(Epub ahead of print). View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Hong H, Zhang Y, Nayak TR, Engle JW, Wong HC, Liu B, Barnhart TE and Cai W: Immuno-PET of tissue factor in pancreatic cancer. J Nucl Med. 53:1748–1754. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Versteeg HH, Schaffner F, Kerver M, Petersen HH, Ahamed J, Felding-Habermann B, Takada Y, Mueller BM and Ruf W: Inhibition of tissue factor signaling suppresses tumor growth. Blood. 111:190–199. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

27 

Harter PN, Dützmann S, Drott U, Zachskorn C, Hattingen E, Capper D, Gessler F, Senft C, Seifert V, Plate KH, et al: Anti-tissue factor (TF9-10H10) treatment reduces tumor cell invasiveness in a novel migratory glioma model. Neuropathology. 33:515–525. 2013.PubMed/NCBI

28 

Breij EC, de Goeij BE, Verploegen S, Schuurhuis DH, Amirkhosravi A, Francis J, Miller VB, Houtkamp M, Bleeker WK, Satijn D, et al: An antibody-drug conjugate that targets tissue factor exhibits potent therapeutic activity against a broad range of solid tumors. Cancer Res. 74:1214–1226. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar

29 

Shi S, Hong H, Orbay H, Graves SA, Yang Y, Ohman JD, Liu B, Nickles RJ, Wong HC and Cai W: ImmunoPET of tissue factor expression in triple-negative breast cancer with a radiolabeled antibody Fab fragment. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. Mar 24–2015.(Epub ahead of print). View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Saito Y, Hashimoto Y, Kuroda J, Yasunaga M, Koga Y, Takahashi A and Matsumura Y: The inhibition of pancreatic cancer invasion-metastasis cascade in both cellular signal and blood coagulation cascade of tissue factor by its neutralisation antibody. Eur J Cancer. 47:2230–2239. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

31 

Matsumura Y and Maeda H: A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: Mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. Cancer Res. 46:6387–6392. 1986.PubMed/NCBI

32 

Gurbaxani B, Dostalek M and Gardner I: Are endosomal trafficking parameters better targets for improving mAb pharmacokinetics than FcRn binding affinity? Mol Immunol. 56:660–674. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

33 

Schneider DW, Heitner T, Alicke B, Light DR, McLean K, Satozawa N, Parry G, Yoo J, Lewis JS and Parry R: In vivo biodistribution, PET imaging, and tumor accumulation of 86Y-and 111In-antimindin/RG-1, engineered antibody fragments in LNCaP tumor-bearing nude mice. J Nucl Med. 50:435–443. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Adams GP, Schier R, McCall AM, Simmons HH, Horak EM, Alpaugh RK, Marks JD and Weiner LM: High affinity restricts the localization and tumor penetration of single-chain fv antibody molecules. Cancer Res. 61:4750–4755. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

35 

Olafsen T and Wu AM: Antibody vectors for imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 40:167–181. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Kampmeier F, Williams JD, Maher J, Mullen GE and Blower PJ: Design and preclinical evaluation of a 99mTc-labelled diabody of mAb J591 for SPECT imaging of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). EJNMMI Res. 4:132014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

December-2015
Volume 47 Issue 6

Print ISSN: 1019-6439
Online ISSN:1791-2423

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Tsumura R, Sato R, Furuya F, Koga Y, Yamamoto Y, Fujiwara Y, Yasunaga M and Matsumura Y: Feasibility study of the Fab fragment of a monoclonal antibody against tissue factor as a diagnostic tool. Int J Oncol 47: 2107-2114, 2015.
APA
Tsumura, R., Sato, R., Furuya, F., Koga, Y., Yamamoto, Y., Fujiwara, Y. ... Matsumura, Y. (2015). Feasibility study of the Fab fragment of a monoclonal antibody against tissue factor as a diagnostic tool. International Journal of Oncology, 47, 2107-2114. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2015.3210
MLA
Tsumura, R., Sato, R., Furuya, F., Koga, Y., Yamamoto, Y., Fujiwara, Y., Yasunaga, M., Matsumura, Y."Feasibility study of the Fab fragment of a monoclonal antibody against tissue factor as a diagnostic tool". International Journal of Oncology 47.6 (2015): 2107-2114.
Chicago
Tsumura, R., Sato, R., Furuya, F., Koga, Y., Yamamoto, Y., Fujiwara, Y., Yasunaga, M., Matsumura, Y."Feasibility study of the Fab fragment of a monoclonal antibody against tissue factor as a diagnostic tool". International Journal of Oncology 47, no. 6 (2015): 2107-2114. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2015.3210