CD73 as a therapeutic target for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor stem cells
- Authors:
- Published online on: December 18, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2015.3299
- Pages: 657-669
Abstract
Introduction
The incidence and prevalence of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are being found increasingly; pNETs represent ~1.3 and 10% of pancreatic malignancy cases in incidence and in prevalence, respectively (1–3). Approximately 65% of pNET patients present with unresectable or metastatic disease (4), and in >40% patients, recurrence or metastasis occurs even after radical surgical resection, resulting in a poor prognosis (5,6). It is urgent to explore the molecular mechanisms of pNET development, progression and metastasis in order to identify new molecular targets for therapy. Indeed, there are currently only two drugs for molecular target therapy, everolimus and sunitinib, which have been approved for clinical use for pNETs.
Emerging evidence suggests that tumor metastasis and recurrence might be caused by a small subpopulation of stemness cells, so-called cancer stem cells (CSCs). CSCs promote tumor invasion and metastasis (7,8), therefore, CSCs are considered to be a promising therapeutic target for cancer (9). There have been numerous investigations for identification of the CSC population based on their characteristics, including the cell surface markers, ability to exclude a fluorescent Hoechst dye, the so-called ‘side population’, aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity and dormancy (10). High ALDH activity has been shown to be one of the reliable CSC markers in several types of solid tumors, including breast, skin, bladder and prostate cancer (11–13). Gaur et al reported that CSCs were identified in gastrointestinal NETs, and that they were isolated using ALDH activity and that the CSC property was verified in 2011 (14). However, there has been no study on the identification and isolation of pNET CSCs, therefore, the clinical significance and a therapeutic target remain unknown.
In this study, we isolated pNET CSCs by sorting with ALDH activity and demonstrated that these cells have the property of stemness. Additionally, in order to acquire a CSC gene profile, genome-wide gene expression analysis was performed using DNA microarray, which revealed CD73 was overexpressed in ALDHhigh cells. We identified CD73 as not only a unique biomarker for pNET CSCs but also as a novel molecular target for pNET therapy.
Materials and methods
Patients and tissue samples
In all, 44 patients with histologically proven pNETs underwent pancreatic resection at the Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital between 2001 and 2013. Of them, 15 patients who underwent surgery from 2012 to 2013 were recruited for Aldeflour assay, 31 cases were randomly selected for immunohistochemical analysis. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients, and our institutional review board approved this study (no. 1080).
Cell culture and transient transfection
Human pNET cell line QGP1 was obtained from the Health Science Research Resources Bank (Osaka, Japan). A murine insulinoma cell line MIN6 was provided by Professor J. Miyazaki (Osaka University, Japan) (15). Both cell lines were used in the present experiments within 10 passages after reception. All cell cultures were routinely tested to rule out mycoplasma infection using PlasmoTest kit (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA). QGP1 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Biological Industries, Beit Haemek, Israel) and 1% Pen/Strep (Gibco, Grand Island, NE, USA) as antibiotics. MIN6 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 25 mmol/l glucose (DMEM; Sigma-Aldrich), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% Pen/Strep and β-mercaptoethanol (2ME) (5 ml/l, Wako, Osaka, Japan). All cell lines were cultivated in a humidified incubator at 37°C in 5% CO2, and were collected with 0.25% trypsin-ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) (Gibco).
Luciferase expression plasmid pGL4.50 [luc2/CMV/Hygro] (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was transfected into QGP1 cells according to the manufacturer's instructions, and luciferase-expressing QGP1 cells (QGP1-Luc) were generated as described previously (16).
Aldeflour assay
A portion of a resected tumor was harvested under sterile conditions in a pathology suite and placed on ice in DMEM/F12 (Gibco) containing 10% fetal bovine serum, care being taken to avoid contaminating adjacent normal tissue. Each specimen was mechanically dissociated with sterile scalpels, digested for 1 h with 10 mg/ml type IV collagenase (Sigma-Aldrich) in fresh DMEM/F12 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, and then filtered through sterile 100-μm membranes to obtain single-cell suspensions. Red blood cells in the surgical samples were lysed using a red blood cell lysis buffer (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Cultured cells were collected with Accutase (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA) as single cells. An Aldefluor kit (Stemcell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada) was used to isolate the population of cells with high ALDH enzymatic activity. Cells were suspended in Aldefluor assay buffer containing ALDH substrate (BAAA, 1 μmol/l) and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. As a negative control, an aliquot of each sample was treated with 50 mmol/l diethyl-aminobenzaldehyde (DEAB), a specific ALDH inhibitor. The fluorescently labeled product, BODIPY-aminoacetate, was produced by cells expressing the ALDH enzyme, and ALDHhigh cells were quantified and purified using FACS Aria II (BD Biosciences).
Spheroid assay
The spheroid assay was performed as described previously (16–18). After FACS sorting, ALDHhigh or bulk cells were plated separately at a density of 300 cells on low attachment plates (96-well Ultra Low Cluster Plate; Costar, Corning, New York, NY, USA), and then incubated in serum-free DMEM/F12 medium (n=20 in each). To investigate sphere formation with the CD73 inhibitor, after FACS sorting, 5×104 ALDHhigh cells were seeded into two 6-cm dishes. After 24 h, PBS or 12 μM α,β-methylene adenosine 5′-diphosphate (APCP) (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to each dish. After 48 h, the medium was changed to drug-free medium, followed by incubation for 24 h. Using trypan blue exclusion, the remaining viable cells were collected and plated separately at 300 cells per low attachment plates, and then incubated in serum-free medium (n=20 in each). Sphere formation was observed using an AxioObserver (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), and images were acquired digitally using AxioVision software (Carl Zeiss). Experiments were independently performed in triplicate.
Hypoxic treatment
Hypoxic treatment was performed as described previously (18). PNET cell lines were seeded into 96-well plates at 3×103 cells per well. After 24 h, the cells were exposed to hypoxic conditions (1% O2, 5% CO2, and 94% N2) in an anaerobic workstation (Hirasawa Works, Tokyo, Japan). The oxygen concentration inside the workstation was constantly monitored with an oxygen sensor (MC-8G-S, Iijima Electrics, Gamagori, Japan) and maintained at 1% during the experiment. After 2, 4 and 6 days, the number of living cells was measured by the MTS assay using a Cell Titer 96 AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay kit (Promega), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The absorbance was read at 490 nm, with 630 nm as the reference wavelength, using a multiwall plate reader (Model 550, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), with wells containing medium but no cells serving as blank controls (16,19). The experiments were independently performed in triplicate.
Scar migration assay
After FACS sorting, pNET cells, ALDHhigh or bulk, were seeded into 96-well plates at 3×103 cells per well. The cell layer was scratched, a 200-μl pipette tip being run the full length of each well. The well was washed once with growth medium to remove cell debris. Images were taken at the time of initial wounding as well as 24, 48 and 72 h post-wounding using an INCell Analyzer 2000 (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA). The wound area was determined using INCell Developer Toolbox software (GE Healthcare). We compared the ratio of the area at 72 h after scratching to that at the time of initial wounding. Experiments were independently performed in triplicate.
Tumor xenotransplantation and tumorigenicity and drug sensitivity assaying in vivo
Female NOD.CB17-PRkdcScid/J mice, 16–19 g and aged 4–6 weeks, were purchased from Charles River Laboratory Inc. (Kanagawa, Japan). The care and use of animals were performed in accordance with institutional guidelines. Various amounts of cells (ALDHhigh and bulk, from 101 to 104 cells each) were mixed with Matrigel (BD Biosciences), and then aliquots were injected subcutaneously into both flanks of mice under isoflurane anesthesia. Tumor formation was then monitored once a week. Cancer initiation frequency was calculated using L-Calc software (Stem Cell Technologies) (20) and significance was determined by Chi-square analysis using ELDA (The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research) (20).
The peritoneal metastatic potential of cancer cells was assessed as reported (21). Briefly, 105 ALDHhigh pNET cells or unsorted control cells were injected intraperitoneally into mice (n=4 mice per group). The mice were monitored using a luciferase-luciferin-based imaging IVIS system (Xenogen, Alameda, CA, USA) under isoflurane anesthesia. Images of the mice were taken every week for up to 14 weeks, and then the mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation. Any mice with ascites formation or a loss of body weight of >25% were euthanized. Animal survival data were entered to the Kaplan-Meier Life Table format and presented as a cumulative survival plot. Statistical differences were analyzed by means of log-rank test. For the drug sensitivity assay, 104 freshly sorted ALDHhigh cells were used. The mice were randomly divided into 2 groups for the experiments. APCP (400 μg/tumor) or PBS was injected into the tumor twice a week after tumor cell injection. Tumor formation was monitored once a week. The tumor volume was estimated using the following equation: volume = (length) × (width)2/2. All in vivo procedures were approved by the Animal Care Committee of Tokyo Medical and Dental University.
RNA extraction and gene expression analysis
Total RNA was extracted from QGP1 freshly sorted ALDHhigh cells and unsorted control cells using a RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and the integrity of the obtained RNA was assessed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). All samples had an RNA Integrity Number of >7.0. Anti-sense RNA was prepared from 100 ng of total RNA using a 3′ IVT Express kit (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Hybridization and signal detection for HG-U133 Plus 2.0 arrays (Affymetrix) were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The microarray datasets for ALDHhigh and unsorted control QGP1 cells were normalized simultaneously using the robust multiarray average method found in R statistical software (v. 2.12.1) together with the Bioconductor package. The estimated gene-expression levels were obtained as log2-transformed values. To reveal functional relationships among genes differentially expressed in ALDHhigh QGP1 cells, a protein interaction network was analyzed. Genes upregulated >1.3-fold between ALDHhigh and unsorted control QGP1 cells were included in the network. Protein interaction data obtained from BIND (http://bond.unleashedinformatics.com), Bio-GRID (http://thebiogrid.org), and HPRD (http://www.hprd.org) were downloaded from the ftp site of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI; ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/gene/GeneRIF/interactions.gz). The protein interaction network was analyzed using Cytoscape software.
Immunocytochemistry
The cells were sorted using the FACSAria II and were incubated for 24 h on glass slides. After fixation with 10% trichloroacetic acid for 15 min at 4°C, the cells were incubated in permeabilization buffer (0.2% Triton-PBS) for 5 min at room temperature. After incubation in a blocking buffer, 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA)-PBS, for 1 h, the slides were incubated with the primary antibodies, CD73 (IE9; 1:50; Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA) for QGP1 or CD73 (C-20; 1:50; Santa Cruz) for MIN6 for another hour. The secondary antibody, Alexa Fluor 647 tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:200; Sigma-Aldrich), was diluted in 3% BSA-PBS, and then incubated with the cells for 30 min. The Hoechst 33342 solution was added for nuclear staining. After mounting, the slides were observed under a fluorescent microscope, AxioObserver (Carl Zeiss).
Immunohistochemical analysis
Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on pNET tissue samples. For the tissue analysis, 31 samples were available, which were stained using the anti-CD73 primary antibody (IE9; Santa Cruz) at 1:50 dilution with PBS followed by reactions in an automated immunostainer (Ventana XT System; Ventana, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) using a standard DAB detection kit (Ventana, Roche). The immunostaining was evaluated quantitatively by counting ≥500 cells in three different random fields under a light microscope. Tissue samples with >5% of strong staining in the pNET tumor cells were diagnosed as positive, and the others were diagnosed as negative immunohistochemically. The immunostaining was evaluated under a light microscope by two independent investigators.
Statistical analysis
Statistical comparisons of clinicopathological characteristics for significance were performed using a Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test with a single degree of freedom, and Student's t-test was used to determine the differences between continuous values. p-values of <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).
Results
Identification of ALDHhigh cells in pNET specimens and cell lines
A total of 15 pNET specimens (7 primary lesions, 7 liver metastatic lesions and 1 lymph node metastatic lesion) were analyzed by Aldefluor assay. Flow cytometry was used to isolate viable single ALDHhigh cells from pNET specimens, with ALDH expression greater than that of the top 0.1% of DEAB-treated negative control cells (Fig. 1A). The ALDHhigh cells were observed in pNET surgical sections, the mean proportion of the subpopulation being 2.1±1.7% (range, 0.2–4.6%).
We also found a small population of cells expressing ALDHhigh in pNET cell lines, QGP1 (human somatostatinoma) and MIN6 (murine insulinoma). Flow cytometric analysis revealed that ALDHhigh cells represented from 1 to 4% of the population in both pNET cell lines, i.e., QGP1 and MIN6 (Fig. 1B).
CSC property of the pNET subpopulation among ALDHhigh cells in vitro
In order to investigate whether or not ALDHhigh cells were characterized as CSCs, sphere-forming ability was evaluated by sphere formation assay. The results showed that ALDHhigh cells formed spheres in contrast to unsorted cells for both QGP1 (Fig. 2A and C; p<0.001) and MIN6 (Fig. 2B and D; p<0.001).
Since the pluripotent potential in embryonic stem cells is efficiently maintained under low oxygen levels (22), and hypoxia contributes to CSCs maintenance (23), the effects of hypoxic treatment on ALDHhigh and unsorted pNET cells were evaluated utilizing QGP1. Cell proliferation was 39% reduced under hypoxic conditions (1% O2) compared to normoxic conditions for control cells, in contrast, no significant difference in proliferation was observed between under hypoxic and normoxic conditions for ALDHhigh cells (Fig. 2E). These results are consistent with the reports showing that hypoxic conditions serve as a stimulus for reprograming cells towards normal stem cells and CSCs (22,23).
To determine whether or not ALDHhigh cells promote cell motility, scar migration assay was performed for QGP1. Cell motility was quantified by measuring the scratch wound closure as a percentage. There was a 20% greater reduction in wound size for ALDHhigh cells than for control unsorted cells (Fig. 2F and G; p=0.006).
CSC property of the pNET subpopulation among ALDHhigh cells in vivo
Different numbers of QGP1 ALDHhigh or unsorted cells were injected subcutaneously into non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mice in numbers ranging from 101 to 104 cells per injection. The results showed ALDHhigh pNET cells had higher tumorigenicity than unsorted cells. Surprisingly, for a very small number of ALDHhigh cells, as few as 101 cells, subcutaneous tumor formation was observed (Fig. 3A and Table I). The cancer initiation frequency was 1 in 83 (95% CI, 33–211) for ALDHhigh pNET cells and 1 in 720 (95% CI, 292–1,777) for unsorted cells (p=0.002). These results suggested that CSCs are enriched in the ALDHhigh subpopulation.
Furthermore, to investigate whether or not the pNET cells establish in vivo metastasis, ALDHhigh or unsorted pNET cells were injected intraperitoneally into a NOD/SCID mouse utilizing QGP1. Peritoneal metastasis was assessed with IVIS imaging system. ALDHhigh cells (105) were sufficient to establish metastasis in all transplanted mice, in contrast, no established metastasis was observed in mice transplanted with 105 unsorted cells (Fig. 3B and C).
Genome-wide gene expression correlates to ALDH activity of pNET cells
Comprehensive gene expression analysis of ALDHhigh and unsorted control QGP1 cells was performed to acquire a CSC gene profile. The microarray data have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under accession number GSE62079. The gene expression changes in 185 probe sets were detected by microarray analysis (fold-change value >2 between ALDHhigh pNET and control cells). Genes associated with mesenchymal stem cells, including CD73 (5′-nucleotidase, ecto) and CD109, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), including caveolin-1 (CAV1) and SLUG (SNAI2), were overexpressed in ALDHhigh cells.
A protein interaction network was then constructed using 4,438 probe sets with ≥1.3-fold overexpression in ALDHhigh pNET cells. To more closely investigate molecular networks associated with CSCs, a sub-network of 3-hop neighbors from the cell adhesion molecule fibronectin 1 (FN1) genes was generated, including CD73 (Fig. 4), which is 12.332-fold overexperessed in ALDHhigh cells compared to the unsorted control cells. On immunocytochemical analysis of QGP1 and MIN6, CD73 overexpression was observed in ALDHhigh cells (Fig. 5).
Effects of a CD73 inhibitor on ALDHhigh cells
We evaluated the efficacy of CD73 inhibition in ALDHhigh cells of pNETs using APCP, which is a known small molecule inhibitor of CD73 in vitro and in vivo (2425). ALDHhigh cells treated with or without APCP showed no significant difference in proliferation (data was not shown). To determine whether or not APCP inhibits the CSC properties of ALDHhigh cells, sphere-forming and scar migration assay were performed for QGP1 cells. The results showed that the number of spheres was 62.2% decreased (Fig. 6A and B; p=0.002) and cell motility was 39% reduced (Fig. 6C and D; p=0.027) on exposure to APCP in ALDHhigh cells.
In order to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of APCP, peritumoral injection of APCP was performed twice a week into the QGP1 ALDHhigh subcutaneous murine xenograft model. As shown in Fig. 6E and F, ≤43% tumor growth inhibition was observed in the group of mice treated with APCP compared with in the control group on day 49 (p=0.003). None of the APCP-treated mice showed signs of wasting or other toxicity compared to control mice. APCP was tolerated at the dose at which antitumor efficacy was observed.
Expression and clinicopathological analysis of CD73 in pNET tissues
Immunohistochemical analysis of tissue samples from 31 patients with pNETs was performed to explore the clinical significance of CD73 expression. As shown in Fig. 7, the CD73 protein was mainly distributed on the cytoplasm of pNET cells. In cases of liver metastasis and peritoneal dissemination, CD73 overexpression was observed (Fig. 7C and D). Consequently, specific overexpression of CD73 was observed in 17 out of 31 cases of primary lesions (54.8%) (Fig. 7A and B). The clinicopathological significance of CD73 expression was evaluated in the CD73-high expression group (n=17), and compared to the low expression group (n=14) of patients with pNETs (Table II). CD73 expression was significantly correlated with invasion into adjacent organs (35% vs 0%; p=0.024).
Table IIAssociation of different patient and tumor specific characteristics with CD73 expression in tumor tissues. |
Discussion
Cancer cells include a small subpopulation of CSCs, which selectively possess tumor initiation, a self-renewal capability and the ability to give rise to bulk populations of non-tumorigenic progeny through differentiation (9). In the present study, a small population of ALDHhigh was observed in both clinical specimens and cell lines of pNETs, and the ALDHhigh population showed the stemness feature in vitro. On the other hand, stem cell markers, such as CD44 and CD133 were not increased in the ALDHhigh cells, indicating that they might not overlap completely with these populations (data not shown). Cellular spheres have been claimed to be enriched with stem cells in normal neural and mammary tissues, as well as in cancers (16,17); hence, the sphere formation assay is a valuable tool for identifying cells with the characteristics of CSCs (26). On sphere-forming assay, the number of spheres observed for unsorted bulk cells is significantly lower than that for ALDHhigh cells (Fig. 2A–D). As an important feature, CSC displayed high tumorigenicity (17,18,27), ALDHhigh cells showed an ~9-fold higher rate of tumorigenicity than unsorted bulk cells (Fig. 3A and Table I), which suggests that CSCs were enriched in the ALDHhigh population of pNETs. According to several studies, CSCs are highly resistant to hypoxia (8,18), a hypoxic microenvironment maintains CSCs in a stem-like state, which leads to invasion and metastasis (28,29). Metastasis and dissemination-initiating cells were found within the subpopulation of CSCs that expressed the EMT markers (10). In this study, ALDHhigh cells exhibited higher resistance to hypoxia and higher motility (Fig. 2E, F and G). Moreover, these cells exhibited a higher rate of dissemination occurrence in the murine peritoneal metastasis model (Fig. 3B and C). These findings strongly suggest that ALDHhigh cells of pNET have CSC features and a high malignant potential, which might be promising for therapeutic targeting for pNET treatment.
In order to explore the molecular and biological characteristics associated with ALDHhigh cells, gene expression profiling was further evaluated in the pNET cell line, which revealed mesenchymal stem cell markers and EMT associated genes were overexpressed in ALDHhigh pNET cell lines. We focused on CD73, also known as ecto-5′-nucleotidase (ecto-5′-NT), which is a 12.332-fold overexpressed gene in ALDHhigh cells. CD73 is a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked nucleotidase present in cell membrane lipid rafts (24). CD73 is also a well-known surface marker of mesenchymal stem cells (30,31), defined as a multipotent population of slow-growing, self-renewing cells (3). Bussolati et al reported that the population of CD73-overexpressed cells showed several stem cell properties: clonogenic ability, capacity of non-adhesive spheroid formation, bipotent differentiation potential into epithelial and endothelial cell types, and in vivo generation of serially transplantable carcinomas in renal cancer cells (32). Moreover, the expression of CD73, CD39 and adenosine receptors is induced by hypoxia, that is one of the most essential stemness features (33).
Overexpression of CD73 was observed in various human carcinomas, associated with tumor neovascularization, invasiveness, metastasis, and with shorter patient survival time (24). In cancer tissues, CD73 functions as a rate-limiting enzyme, together with CD39, in the generation of extracellular adenosine (34). CD39 hydrolyzes adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) to adenosine monophosphate (AMP), which is further hydrolyzed to adenosine by CD73 (34). Chronically increased adenosine leads to immune tolerance by accumulating in the tumor environment and stroma, and contributes to the generation of an angiogenic and matrix remodeling environment that is suitable for cancer growth. Adenosine not only functions in the tumor micro-environment, but is also involved in the regulation of proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis of cancer cells (35). The adenosine receptor activated by extracellular adenosine leads to reduction of cell adhesion and to subsequent cell scattering, and these responses promote metastasis and dissemination (35). In this study, CD73 inhibition by a small molecule inhibitor impaired the stemness property of ALDHhigh cells in pNETs including sphere-formation ability and cell motility in vitro, and significantly reduced tumor growth in the murine xenograft model of pNET.
In conclusion, the ALDHhigh cell population of pNET displayed CSC characteristics in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, CD73 might play a critical role in the maintenance and progression of ALDHhigh cells, and be promising as a novel therapeutical target for pNETs. More recently, CD73 was identified as a potential biomarker of anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint therapy (36). Urgent studies on CD73 are expected to confirm that it is a target for the treatment of pNETs.
References
Yao JC, Eisner MP, Leary C, Dagohoy C, Phan A, Rashid A, Hassan M and Evans DB: Population-based study of islet cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 14:3492–3500. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, Dagohoy C, Leary C, Mares JE, Abdalla EK, Fleming JB, Vauthey JN, Rashid A, et al: One hundred years after ‘carcinoid’: Epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 26:3063–3072. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Song L, Webb NE, Song Y and Tuan RS: Identification and functional analysis of candidate genes regulating mesenchymal stem cell self-renewal and multipotency. Stem Cells. 24:1707–1718. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yao JC, Shah MH, Ito T, Bohas CL, Wolin EM, Van Cutsem E, Hobday TJ, Okusaka T, Capdevila J, de Vries EG, et al: RAD001 in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors, Third Trial (RADIANT-3) Study Group: Everolimus for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. N Engl J Med. 364:514–523. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Strosberg JR, Cheema A, Weber JM, Ghayouri M, Han G, Hodul PJ and Kvols LK: Relapse-free survival in patients with nonmetastatic, surgically resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: An analysis of the AJCC and ENETS staging classifications. Ann Surg. 256:321–325. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
de Herder WW: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 26:689–690. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Miletti-González KE, Chen S, Muthukumaran N, Saglimbeni GN, Wu X, Yang J, Apolito K, Shih WJ, Hait WN and Rodríguez-Rodríguez L: The CD44 receptor interacts with P-glycoprotein to promote cell migration and invasion in cancer. Cancer Res. 65:6660–6667. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hanahan D and Weinberg RA: Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 144:646–674. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Reya T, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF and Weissman IL: Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature. 414:105–111. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Baccelli I and Trumpp A: The evolving concept of cancer and metastasis stem cells. J Cell Biol. 198:281–293. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ma I and Allan AL: The role of human aldehyde dehydrogenase in normal and cancer stem cells. Stem Cell Rev. 7:292–306. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Ginestier C, Hur MH, Charafe-Jauffret E, Monville F, Dutcher J, Brown M, Jacquemier J, Viens P, Kleer CG, Liu S, et al: ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome. Cell Stem Cell. 1:555–567. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Luo Y, Dallaglio K, Chen Y, Robinson WA, Robinson SE, McCarter MD, Wang J, Gonzalez R, Thompson DC, Norris DA, et al: ALDH1A isozymes are markers of human melanoma stem cells and potential therapeutic targets. Stem Cells. 30:2100–2113. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Gaur P, Sceusi EL, Samuel S, Xia L, Fan F, Zhou Y, Lu J, Tozzi F, Lopez-Berestein G, Vivas-Mejia P, et al: Identification of cancer stem cells in human gastrointestinal carcinoid and neuroendocrine tumors. Gastroenterology. 141:1728–1737. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Miyazaki J, Araki K, Yamato E, Ikegami H, Asano T, Shibasaki Y, Oka Y and Yamamura K: Establishment of a pancreatic beta cell line that retains glucose-inducible insulin secretion: Special reference to expression of glucose transporter isoforms. Endocrinology. 127:126–132. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ogawa K, Tanaka S, Matsumura S, Murakata A, Ban D, Ochiai T, Irie T, Kudo A, Nakamura N, Tanabe M, et al: EpCAM-targeted therapy for human hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 21:1314–1322. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Adikrisna R, Tanaka S, Muramatsu S, Aihara A, Ban D, Ochiai T, Irie T, Kudo A, Nakamura N, Yamaoka S, et al: Identification of pancreatic cancer stem cells and selective toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents. Gastroenterology. 143:234–45.e7. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Muramatsu S, Tanaka S, Mogushi K, Adikrisna R, Aihara A, Ban D, Ochiai T, Irie T, Kudo A, Nakamura N, et al: Visualization of stem cell features in human hepatocellular carcinoma reveals in vivo significance of tumor-host interaction and clinical course. Hepatology. 58:218–228. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yoshitake K, Tanaka S, Mogushi K, Aihara A, Murakata A, Matsumura S, Mitsunori Y, Yasen M, Ban D, Noguchi N, et al: Importin-α1 as a novel prognostic target for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 18:2093–2103. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ishizawa K, Rasheed ZA, Karisch R, Wang Q, Kowalski J, Susky E, Pereira K, Karamboulas C, Moghal N, Rajeshkumar NV, et al: Tumor-initiating cells are rare in many human tumors. Cell Stem Cell. 7:279–282. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Tanaka S, Pero SC, Taguchi K, Shimada M, Mori M, Krag DN and Arii S: Specific peptide ligand for Grb7 signal transduction protein and pancreatic cancer metastasis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 98:491–498. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yoshida Y, Takahashi K, Okita K, Ichisaka T and Yamanaka S: Hypoxia enhances the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 5:237–241. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li Z, Bao S, Wu Q, Wang H, Eyler C, Sathornsumetee S, Shi Q, Cao Y, Lathia J, McLendon RE, et al: Hypoxia-inducible factors regulate tumorigenic capacity of glioma stem cells. Cancer Cell. 15:501–513. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhang B: CD73: A novel target for cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Res. 70:6407–6411. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Stagg J, Divisekera U, McLaughlin N, Sharkey J, Pommey S, Denoyer D, Dwyer KM and Smyth MJ: Anti-CD73 antibody therapy inhibits breast tumor growth and metastasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107:1547–1552. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chojnacki A and Weiss S: Production of neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes from mammalian CNS stem cells. Nat Protoc. 3:935–940. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yang ZF, Ho DW, Ng MN, Lau CK, Yu WC, Ngai P, Chu PW, Lam CT, Poon RT and Fan ST: Significance of CD90+ cancer stem cells in human liver cancer. Cancer Cell. 13:153–166. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Keith B and Simon MC: Hypoxia-inducible factors, stem cells, and cancer. Cell. 129:465–472. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mimeault M and Batra SK: Hypoxia-inducing factors as master regulators of stemness properties and altered metabolism of cancer- and metastasis-initiating cells. J Cell Mol Med. 17:30–54. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mahmood A, Harkness L, Abdallah BM, Elsafadi M, Al-Nbaheen MS, Aldahmash A and Kassem M: Derivation of stromal (skeletal and mesenchymal) stem-like cells from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 21:3114–3124. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chamberlain G, Fox J, Ashton B and Middleton J: Concise review: mesenchymal stem cells: their phenotype, differentiation capacity, immunological features, and potential for homing. Stem Cells. 25:2739–2749. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bussolati B, Bruno S, Grange C, Ferrando U and Camussi G: Identification of a tumor-initiating stem cell population in human renal carcinomas. FASEB J. 22:3696–3705. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Eltzschig HK, Köhler D, Eckle T, Kong T, Robson SC and Colgan SP: Central role of Sp1-regulated CD39 in hypoxia/ischemia protection. Blood. 113:224–232. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Stagg J and Smyth MJ: Extracellular adenosine triphosphate and adenosine in cancer. Oncogene. 29:5346–5358. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Antonioli L, Blandizzi C, Pacher P and Haskó G: Immunity, inflammation and cancer: A leading role for adenosine. Nat Rev Cancer. 13:842–857. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Beavis PA, Slaney CY, Milenkovski N, Henderson MA, Loi S, Stagg J, Kershaw MH and Darcy PK: CD73: A potential biomarker for anti-PD-1 therapy. OncoImmunology. 4:e10466752015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |