Whole-genome DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation profiling for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma

  • Authors:
    • Chao Ye
    • Ran Tao
    • Qingyi Cao
    • Danhua Zhu
    • Yini Wang
    • Jie Wang
    • Juan Lu
    • Ermei Chen
    • Lanjuan Li
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: May 24, 2016     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2016.3535
  • Pages: 589-602
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common solid tumor worldwide with a poor prognosis. Accumulating evidence has implicated important regulatory roles of epigenetic modifications in the occurrence and progression of HCC. In the present study, we analyzed 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) levels in the tumor tissues and paired adjacent peritumor tissues (APTs) from four individual HCC patients using a (hydroxy)methylated DNA immunoprecipitation approach combined with deep sequencing [(h)MeDIP-Seq]. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that the 5-mC levels in the promoter regions of 2796 genes and the 5-hmC levels in 507 genes differed significantly between HCC tissues and APTs. These differential genes were grouped into various clusters and pathways and found to be particularly enriched in the ‘metabolic pathways’ that include ‘Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis’, ‘Oxidative phosphorylation’ and ‘Citrate cycle (TCA cycle)’, implicating a potential role of metabolic alterations in HCC. Furthermore, 144 genes had both 5-mC and 5-hmC changes in HCC patients, and 10 of them (PCNA, MDM2, STAG1, E2F4, FGF4, FGF19, RHOBTB2, UBE2QL1, DCN and HSP90AA1) were enriched and interconnected in five pathways including the ‘Cell cycle’, ‘Pathway in cancer’, ‘Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis’, ‘Melanoma’ and ‘Prostate cancer’ pathways. The genome-wide mapping of 5-mC and 5-hmC in HCC tissues and APTs indicated that both 5-mC and 5-hmC epigenetic modifications play important roles in the regulation of HCC, and there may be some interconnections between them. Taken together, in the present study we conducted the first genome-wide mapping of DNA methylation combined with hydroxymethylation in HBV-related HCC and provided a series of potential novel epigenetic biomarkers for HCC.

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a common solid tumor, is the third most frequent cause of cancer-related death in the world. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the main cause of HCC in China (1). Individuals with chronic HBV infection, especially those who have progressed to chronic liver disease and cirrhosis, are at high risk of developing HCC (2,3). Most HCC patients are diagnosed at their advancing stage and refractory to chemotherapy and radiotherapy (4,5). Even if the patients receive liver transplantation, the recurrence rate is still high (6).

Epigenetic modifications are found to play important roles in various biological processes especially in cancer development (7). Methylation of DNA at 5-position of cytosines (5-mC) is a key epigenetic mark that has been extensively studied in many types of malignancies (8). Aberrant DNA methylation of promoter CpG islands has been associated with global hypomethylation and specific loci hypermethylation, which has the potential to become diagnostic markers for the progression of malignant tumors (9). 5-mC can be converted to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) by the ten-eleven translocation (TET) family proteins. In mammals, 5-hmC is detected in almost all tissues and cell types (10,11). Emerging evidence has shown that 5-hmC and TET family might serve unique biological roles in many biological processes such as gene expression regulation, gene transcription and DNA methylation regulation (12,13). Several studies have found 5-hmC alternations in the epigenetic regulation of various diseases, including cancer (14).

Studies of DNA methylation changes in HCC have led to the identification of several candidate methylated genes as potential tumor biomarkers (15,16), yet, little is known about hydroxymethylation distribution in HCC. In previous studies, DNA methylation was determined using methylation sensitive polymerase chain reaction combined bisulfite restriction analysis (COBRA) or bisulfite sequencing techniques. With the development of high-throughput sequencing technologies, the whole-genome DNA (hydroxy)methylation profiling in cancer has generated data with significantly higher quantity and quality (17,18). However, most existing studies of DNA methylation in HCC employed Infinium HumanMethylation BeadChip Arrays or Methylation Microarray (19,20), which may have some limitations on resolution and scope. A novel method termed (hydroxy)methylated DNA immunoprecipitation sequencing [(h)MeDIP-Seq], combining DNA immunoprecipitation with high-throughput sequencing, has emerged as an advantageous tool for identifying (hydroxy) methylated CpG-rich sequences in a much faster and more sensitive manner than ever before.

In an attempt to explore the 5-mC/5-hmC changes in HCC, we performed a genome-wide mapping of 5-mC/5-hmC in four paired HCC tissues and adjacent peritumor tissues (APTs) using MeDIP-Seq/hMeDIP-Seq.

Materials and methods

Clinical samples

Total of 4 fresh-frozen primary HCC tissues and paired APTs were included in MeDIP-Seq/hMeDIP-Seq. The collected cancer tissues were excised within the margins of the cancer lesion, and the APTs were collected from a location at least 3 cm distant from the tumor boundaries. All the collections followed the same protocol. All of the cancerous tissues were diagnosed as primary hepatocellular carcinoma, provided by two independent and experienced pathologists. Fresh-frozen HCC tissues and APTs were collected during the surgical resection.

The four HCC patients were HBV surface antigen-positive without hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and exhibited the same cirrhosis etiology. Retrospectively data were collected including demographic, preoperative laboratory and pathological parameters from electronic medical records, and are summarized in Table I.

Table I

Clinicopathological features for the four HCC patients included in the study.

Table I

Clinicopathological features for the four HCC patients included in the study.

VariablesSAM 1SAM 2SAM 3SAM 4
Case number560629852716677717323
Age (years)41534057
GenderMaleMaleMaleMale
ALT (U/l)35305434
AFP(ng/ml)2>5000012628.58241
HBV-DNA104103103103
Tumor size (cm)2×27.5×83.5×38.5×8.5
Tumor numberSingleMultipleSingleSingle
PVTTNoYesYesYes
GradeModeratePoorModerateModerate

[i] PVTT, portal vein tumor thrombus.

DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from frozen HCC tissues and paired APTs using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen; 69504) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, tissues were homogenized using a hand-held homogenizer, digested with Proteinase K (Qiagen; 69504) and RNase A (Qiagen; 19101) overnight at 56°C, precipitated and washed. Concentration and purity of DNA were measured using a NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

MeDIP-seq and hMeDIP-seq

As previously described (21,22), the genomic DNA was fragmented using a Covaris sonication system (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA) according to the parameters. After sonication, the fragments were denatured to produce single stranded DNA (ssDNA). Following denaturation, the ssDNA was incubated with anti-5-mC antibody or anti-5-hmC antibody. The antibody-DNA complexes were captured by protein A/G beads, and the MeDIP and hMeDIP products were collected for sequencing with HiSeq™ 2000 sequencing system (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

Identification of differential methylation/hydroxymethylation regions (DMR/DHMR)

DMR and DHMR identification are based on reads per kilo base of transcript per million mapped reads (RPKM)-normalized to 5-mC and 5-hmC density, used model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS).

Functional enrichment analysis

Functional enrichment analysis is for the genes associated with DMRs and DHMRs. Gene Ontology (GO) (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) is a standard classification system inferring gene function and gene products. PANTHER website (http://go.pantherdb.org/) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis (Web-based Gene Set Analysis Tool Kit and http://www.kegg.jp/kegg/pathway.html) were also used suggesting physiological functions of these genes.

Ethics statement

All experimental protocols and study methods were approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University. The written consent was received from each participant in the present study at the time of surgery.

Results

Global DNA (hydroxy)methylation changes in HCC tissues and APTs

We isolated total genomic DNA from the 4 HCC tumor tissues and paired APTs, and employed (h)MeDIP-seq to explore genome-wide 5-mC and 5-hmC profiles for the 8 samples. In total, MACS identified 4.52 million reads and 6.0 million reads of sequencing data for 5-mC and 5-hmC, respectively (Table II). Differential 5-mC and 5-hmC peaks between HCC tumor tissues and paired APTs are shown in Table III. Density distribution of these peaks on the whole genome is shown in Fig. 1. 5-mC and 5-hmC peak enrichment profiles of HCC tumor tissues compared with APTs in genomic areas were shown in Fig. 2. Both CvP and PvC differential peaks of 5-mC were enriched in X5UTR and Exon. 5-hmC peak enrichment seemed average in each genomic features.

Table II

Number of reads generated by (h)MeDIP-Seq for each sample.

Table II

Number of reads generated by (h)MeDIP-Seq for each sample.

560 (P/T)629852 (P/T)716677 (P/T)717323 (P/T)
MeDIP-Seq
 Total number of readsP178,832,47288,179,932293980220338428
T176,540,07204,678,832145223631407738
 Total number of mapped readP129,391,26222,400,942140852716080416
T152,462,39160,719,421944868328980186
 Mapping rate (%)P72.35%77.17%93.32%79.06%
T86.36%78.52%90.66%92.27%
hMeDIP-Seq
 Total number of readsP251,088,30299,964,13340,096,74316,801,82
T340,606,22314,499,77265,629,54269,660,39
 Total number of mapped readsP191,931,19248,284,70265,222,32239,597,42
T266,231,98247,343,23213,428,28214,664,23
 Mapping rate (%)P76.44%82.77%77.98%75.63%
T78.16%78.65%80.35%79.60%

Table III

Differentially expressed peaks of 5-mC and 5-hmC MACS of each paired samples.

Table III

Differentially expressed peaks of 5-mC and 5-hmC MACS of each paired samples.

SamplesMeDIP-CvPMeDIP-PvChMeDIP-CvPhMeDIP-PvC
56051475447721485353739
62985291373582390615748
71732370363874001646417036
7166771740823586424979332

[i] CvP, upregulated peaks in HCC tumor tissues compared with paired APTs; PvC, downregulated peaks in HCC tumor tissues compared with paired APTs.

Analysis of DMR and hDMR-associated genes in promoter regions

Promoter region is an important gene regulation region, and the methylation or demethylation at this region plays a key regulatory role in gene expression. In the present study, we carried out further bioinformatics analysis to identify locus-specific DMRs and hDMRs between HCC tumor tissues and APTs in the promoter region (−3.5K to +1.5K of TSS). The total differential 5-mC peaks (DMRs) that exhibited significant difference between the two groups (>2-fold, P<0.05) were associated with nearly 4097 genes in terms of RefSeq ID. Of the four samples, 1924, 788, 4521 and 734 genes had hypermethylation (5-mC-CvP) at their promoters while 2956, 1667, 2490 and 1310 genes had hypomethylation (5-mC-PvC), respectively (Table IV).

Table IV

Numbers of DMRs and hDMRs associated genes.

Table IV

Numbers of DMRs and hDMRs associated genes.

Samples5-mC-CvP5-mC-PvC5-hmC-CvP5-hmC-PvC
560192429573852061
6298527341310457171
71732345212490391897
71667778816671506507

[i] CvP, upregulated genes in HCC tumor tissues compared with paired APTs; PvC, downregulated genes in HCC tumor tissues compared with paired APTs.

The same analysis was carried out to search for differential 5-hmC peaks (DHMRs) between HCC tumor tissues and APTs in the promoter. An average of 1593 genes were associated. Genes (385, 1506, 391 and 457) showed higher 5-hmC levels (5-hmC-CvP) in the promoter in HCC tissues compared with APTs of the four samples, while 2061, 507, 897 and 171 genes showed lower 5-hmC levels (5-hmC-PvC), respectively. (Table IV).

Functional enrichment analysis of 5-mC and 5-hmC associated genes

A total of 1133 5-mC-CvP genes and 1663 5-mC-PvC genes were found in at least two samples (Fig. 3A and B). The significant GO categories of these genes are shown in Fig. 4 (P<0.05). The most enriched term of 5-mC-CvP genes is ‘Transition metal ion binding’ (GO:0046914, P=7.20E-06), ‘Regulation of RNA metabolic process’ (GO:0051252, P=4.10E-05) and ‘DNA binding’ (GO:0003677, P=4.60E-05), while the 5-mC-PvC genes were enriched in ‘Plasma membrane’ (GO:0005886, P=2.80E-05), ‘Keratin filament’ (GO:0045095, P=6.50E-05) and ‘Cyclic-nucleotide-mediated signaling’ (GO:0019935, P=8.70E-05).

The KEGG pathway analysis showed that the significantly differential hypermethylated genes were enriched in several pathways such as ‘Metabolic pathways’ (adjP=0.0021) (such as GBE1, GALNT6, NDUFS6, HEXB, RRM1 and CKMT2) and ‘Pathways in cancer’ (adjP=0.0027) (such as CDKN2A, CDKN2B, APC, GSTP1, DAPK3, FADD, FGF4 and FGF19), while differential hypomethylated genes were enriched in ‘Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction’ (adjP=0.0011) (such as P2RY4, SSTR5, AVPR2, MAS1, NTSR1 PRSS3, GHSR and CALCRL) and ‘Calcium signaling pathway’ (adjP=0.0140) (such as ATP2B3, RYR1, NTSR1, NOS1, HTR5A, SLC25A31, GNAS and DRD5). In Table V all significant KEGG pathways (adjp<0.05) are listed. For protein class by PANTHER website, both hypermethylated and hypomethylated genes were mainly associated with ‘Nucleic acid binding’, ‘Hydrolase’ and ‘Receptor’ (Fig. 5).

Table V

KEGG pathway analysis of hypermethylated and hypomethylated genes.

Table V

KEGG pathway analysis of hypermethylated and hypomethylated genes.

A, KEGG pathway analysis of hypermethylated genes

Pathway nameIDGeneEntrezGeneStatistic
Regulation of actin cytoskeleton0481020WASF2, GNG12, NRAS, FGF4, APC, CYFIP2, PDGFB, FGF19, MAP2K2, TIAM2, ARHGAP35, GNA12, PIK3R5, TMSB4Y, ARHGEF1, PPP1CA, ITGB4, RRAS2, ACTN3, MYL12B C=213;O=20;E=5.37;R=3.72; rawP=5.64e-07;adjP=6.26e-05
Systemic lupus erythematosus0532215HIST1H4F, HIST1H4K, HIST1H2BM, H2AFY, HIST1H2BI, ELANE, HIST1H2AL, HIST3H2BB, HIST1H3G, ACTN3, TROVE2, HIST3H2A, HIST1H3J, HIST1H2AJ, HIST1H4H C=136;O=15;E=3.43;R=4.37; rawP=1.96e-06;adjP=0.0001
Metabolic pathways0110051GBE1, GALNT6, NDUFS6, HEXB, RRM1, CKMT2, GDA, BCAT1, RPE, GLUL, SDHA, HYAL2, CYP51A1, NDUFV1, HMGCS1, NDUFA2, CYP4F11, CTPS1, SUCLG2, POLR3C, DGAT1, LDHB, HMGCR, B3GALT6, ALOX12, MGAT4B, SMPD1, TBXAS1, AK4, BST1, POLG2, HYAL4, DGKE, POLR3G, GALNT3, AK1, ATP6V1D, SGSH, TCIRG1, B3GAT2, PC, DCXR, DHRS9, CEPT1, PLCB4, SQLE, ACADM, GPI, PTDSS1, UGT2B7, ALOX15B C=1130;O=51;E=28.51;R=1.79; rawP=5.73e05;adjP=0.0021
Pathways in cancer0520021CDKN2B, NRAS, LAMC1, FGF4, DVL3, CTBP2, APC, PDGFB, GSTP1, FGF19, MAP2K2, DAPK3, FADD, FZD7, CSF3R, BMP2, LEF1, PIK3R5, MSH3, BMP4, CDKN2A C=326;O=21;E=8.22;R=2.55; rawP=9.84e05;adjP=0.0027
Gastric acid secretion049718ADCY6, PLCB4, SLC4A2, CFTR, ADCY5, KCNJ1, KCNJ15, CALML6 C=74;O=8;E=1.87;R=4.29; rawP=0.0006;adjP=0.0133
Purine metabolism0023012AK1, PDE4A, ADCY5, PDE7A, RRM1, AK4, ADCY6, GDA, PDE4D, POLR3C, PDE3B, POLR3G C=162;O=12;E=4.09;R=2.94; rawP=0.0009;adjP=0.0148
Pancreatic secretion049729ADCY6, PLCB4, CELA2A, SLC4A2, CFTR, CELA3B, BST1, ADCY5, ATP2B1 C=101;O=9;E=2.55;R=3.53; rawP=0.0011;adjP=0.0148
Melanoma052187NRAS, FGF4, PDGFB, PIK3R5, FGF19, MAP2K2, CDKN2A C=71;O=7;E=1.79;R=3.91; rawP=0.0021;adjP=0.0194
Tight junction0453010NRAS, PRKCZ, MPP5, CTTN, RRAS2, ACTN3, CLDN14, MYL12B, TJAP1, CLDN11 C=132;O=10;E=3.33;R=3.00; rawP=0.0020;adjP=0.0194
Basal cell carcinoma052176BMP2, DVL3, APC, LEF1, BMP4, FZD7 C=55;O=6;E=1.39;R=4.32; rawP=0.0026;adjP=0.0222
Cell cycle041109CDKN2B, PCNA, STAG1, YWHAZ, ORC1, TFDP2, CDC23, CDKN2A, ORC6 C=124;O=9;E=3.13;R=2.88; rawP=0.0043;adjP=0.0341
Glioma052146NRAS, PDGFB, PIK3R5, MAP2K2, CDKN2A, CALML6 C=65;O=6;E=1.64;R=3.66; rawP=0.0059;adjP=0.0409
Vascular smooth muscle contraction042708GNA12, ADCY5, ARHGEF1, CALML6, PLCB4, ADCY6, PPP1CA, MAP2K2 C=116;O=8;E=2.93;R=2.73; rawP=0.0093;adjP=0.0492
Glutathione metabolism004805OPLAH, GPX7, GSTP1, GSTM4, RRM1 C=50;O=5;E=1.26;R=3.96; rawP=0.0084;adjP=0.0492
Insulin signaling pathway049109PRKAG2, NRAS, PIK3R5, PRKCZ, CALML6, PPP1CA, PDE3B, MAP2K2, PRKAR1A C=138;O=9;E=3.48;R=2.59; rawP=0.0085;adjP=0.0492
Oocyte meiosis041148SPDYA, ADCY5, SLK, CALML6, ADCY6, YWHAZ, PPP1CA, CDC23 C=112;O=8;E=2.83;R=2.83; rawP=0.0076;adjP=0.0492

B, KEGG pathway analysis of hypomethylated genes

Pathway nameIDGeneEntrezGeneStatistic

Neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction0408026P2RY4, SSTR5, AVPR2, MAS1, NTSR1, PRSS3, GHSR, CALCRL, CHRM4, F2RL3, HTR5A, GRM8, HTR1D, SSTR3, DRD5, GABRB3, P2RX6, CNR1, GRM4, LEP, UTS2R, SSTR4, MC5R, ADRA2B, PARD3, HRH1 C=272;O=26;E=10.05;R=2.59; rawP=1.10e05;adjP=0.0011
Dilated cardiomyopathy0541411GNAS, SGCA, TPM2, CACNA1C, ADCY5, CACNB2, ADCY9, TPM4, ADCY6, CACNA2D4, ADCY7 C=90;O=11;E=3.33;R=3.31; rawP=0.0005;adjP=0.0098
Bile secretion0497610GNAS, SLC4A5, KCNN2, ADCY5, ATP1A4, ADCY9, ADCY6, HMGCR, ADCY7, AQP8 C=71;O=10;E=2.62;R=3.81; rawP=0.0003;adjP=0.0098
Calcium signaling pathway0402016ATP2B3, RYR1, NTSR1, NOS1, HTR5A, SLC25A31, GNAS, DRD5, CACNA1C, CALML5, P2RX6, ADCY9, CACNA1B, CALML3, ADCY7, HRH1 C=177;O=16;E=6.54;R=2.45; rawP=0.0009;adjP=0.0140
Pathogenic Escherichia coli infection051308FYN, TUBA3C, ARPC1B, NCK2, ARPC2, TUBB8, TUBA3E, TUBB3 C=56;O=8;E=2.07;R=3.87; rawP=0.0010;adjP=0.0140
Chemokine signaling pathway0406216CXCR5, CX3CR1, BCAR1, TIAM2, SHC1, GNGT2, ADCY5, ADCY9, IL8, ADCY6, GRK1, ARRB2, TIAM1, PARD3, ADCY7, GRK7 C=189;O=16;E=6.99;R=2.29; rawP=0.0019;adjP=0.0169
Gap junction0454010GNAS, TUBA3C, ADCY5, ADCY9, GJD2, ADCY6, TUBB8, TUBA3E, TUBB3, ADCY7 C=90;O=10;E=3.33;R=3.01; rawP=0.0018;adjP=0.0169
Gastric acid secretion049719GNAS, CALML5, ADCY5, ATP1A4, ADCY9, ADCY6, ATP4B, CALML3, ADCY7 C=74;O=9;E=2.74;R=3.29; rawP=0.0016;adjP=0.0169
Melanogenesis0491610GNAS, CALML5, ADCY5, FZD9, ADCY9, POMC, ADCY6, CALML3, TCF7L2, ADCY7 C=101;O=10;E=3.73;R=2.68; rawP=0.0042;adjP=0.0317
Pancreatic secretion0497210GNAS, CTRB1, CELA3A, ATP2B3, ADCY5, PRSS3, ATP1A, ADCY9, ADCY6, ADCY7 C=101;O=10;E=3.73;R=2.68; rawP=0.0042;adjP=0.0317

[i] C, the number of reference genes in the category; O is the number of genes in the gene set and also in the category; E, the expected number in the category; R, ratio of enrichment; rawP, P-value from hypergeometric test; adjP, P-value adjusted by the multiple test adjustment.

Next, DHMRs between HCC tumor tissues and APTs in the promoter were subjected to the same analysis. A total of 223 5-hmC-CvP genes and 284 5-hmC-PvC genes were found in at least two samples (Fig. 3C and D). The most significant GO categories of 5-hmC-CvP genes were ‘Plasma membrane’ (GO:0005886, p=3.10E-05), ‘G-protein coupled receptor protein signaling pathway’ (GO:0007186, P=3.60E-03) and ‘Intrinsic component of membrane’ (GO:0031224, P=1.10E-02). 5-hmC-PvC genes were enriched in ‘Cytosol’ (GO:0005829, P=3.10E-02), ‘Nucleoplasm part’ (GO:0044451, P=1.90E-02) and ‘Transcription factor complex’ (GO:0005667, P=1.60E-02). The significant GO categories of these genes are shown in Fig. 6.

KEGG pathway analysis revealed that 5-hmC-CvP genes were enriched in ‘MAPK signaling’ (such as FGF4, FGF19, MEF2C and FGF3) and ‘Pathway in cancer’ (such as MMP9, SMAD4, FGF19 and FGF3), while 5-hmC-PvC genes were enriched in ‘Cell cycle’ (such as MDM2, STAG1 and E2F4) and ‘Metabolic pathways’ (such as ALG9, FLAD1, ST3GAL4, NDUFC2, POLR2J3, DHRS9 and G6PD). All significant pathways are listed in Table VI. The PANTHER classification system identified that DHMRs associated genes were mainly enriched in ‘Nucleic acid binding’ and ‘Hydrolase’, the same as the DMRs (Fig. 5).

Table VI

KEGG pathway analysis of upregulated and downregulated 5-hmC related genes.

Table VI

KEGG pathway analysis of upregulated and downregulated 5-hmC related genes.

A, KEGG pathway analysis of upregulated 5-hmC related genes

Pathway nameIDGeneEntrezGeneStatistic
Olfactory transduction047409OR2T3, OR51V1, OR2L3, OR51F2, OR56A1 OR2M3, OR52N5, OR4M2, OR4N4 C=388;O=9;E=1.65;R=5.47; rawP=4.63e-05;adjP=0.0005
Antigen processing and presentation046123KIR3DL1, KIR3DL2, KIR3DL3 C=76;O=3;E=0.32;R=9.30; rawP=0.0042;adjP=0.0092
Melanoma052183FGF4, FGF19, FGF3 C=71;O=3;E=0.30;R=9.96; rawP=0.0035;adjP=0.0092
Natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity046504KIR3DL1, ICAM2, KIR3DL2, KIR3DL3 C=136;O=4;E=0.58;R=6.93; rawP=0.0028;adjP=0.0092
Pathways in cancer052005MMP9, FGF4, SMAD4, FGF19, FGF3 C=326;O=5;E=1.38;R=3.61; rawP=0.0130;adjP=0.0238
MAPK signaling pathway040104FGF4, FGF19, MEF2C, FGF3 C=268;O=4;E=1.14;R=3.52; rawP=0.0278;adjP=0.0382
RNA transport030133NUP62, GEMIN4, NXT2 C=151;O=3;E=0.64;R=4.68; rawP=0.0268;adjP=0.0382

B, KEGG pathway analysis of downregulated 5-hmC related genes

Pathway nameIDGeneEntrezGeneStatistics

Cell cycle041105MDM2, STAG1, E2F4, CDK4, TFDP1 C=124;O=5;E=0.78;R=6.37; rawP=0.0012;adjP=0.0140
TGF-β signaling pathway043504DCN, GDF6, E2F4, TFDP1 C=84;O=4;E=0.53;R=7.52; rawP=0.0020;adjP=0.0140
Staphylococcus aureus infection051503C1QB, FCGR3B, C3AR1 C=55;O=3;E=0.35;R=8.62; rawP=0.0052;adjP=0.0243
Epithelial cell signaling in Helicobacter pylori infection051203F11R, ATP6V1G2, ATP6V0A4 C=68;O=3;E=0.43;R=6.97; rawP=0.0093;adjP=0.0254
Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis041204RHOBTB2, UBE2Q1, UBE3B, MDM2 C=135;O=4;E=0.85;R=4.68; raw P=0.0109;adjP=0.0254
Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum041414HSP90AA1, ERP29, DNAJA2, TXNDC5 C=165;O=4;E=1.04;R=3.83; rawP=0.0212;adjP=0.0371
Metabolic pathways0110013ALG9, FLAD1, ST3GAL4, NDUFC2, POLR2J3, DHRS9, G6PD, ATP6V1G2, SMPD1, ASMT, ATP6V0A4, NOS1, AKR1A1 C=1130;O=13;E=7.15;R=1.82; rawP=0.0290;adjP=0.0451

[i] C, the number of reference genes in the category; O, the number of genes in the gene set and also in the category; E, the expected number in the category; R, ratio of enrichment; rawP, P-value from hypergeometric test; adjP, P-value adjusted by the multiple test adjustment.

KEGG pathway analysis of ‘metabolic pathway’-associated genes

There were several 5-mC and 5-hmC changed genes enriched in ‘Metabolic pathways’ further KEGG pathway analysis for these genes revealed that they were gathered in glucose metabolism [including ‘Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis’ (00010), ‘Pentose and glucuronate interconversions’ (00030), ‘Starch and sucrose metabolism’ (00500), ‘Glycosaminoglycan degradation’ (00531)], energy metabolism [including ‘Oxidative phosphorylation’ (00190), ‘Citrate cycle (TCA cycle)’ (00020), ‘Carbon metabolism’ (01200)], and amino acid metabolism, [including ‘Biosynthesis of amino acids’ (01230), ‘Cysteine and methionine metabolism’ (00270), ‘Arginine and proline metabolism’ (00330), ‘Arachidonic acid metabolism’ (00590)] ‘Purine metabolism’ and ‘Pyrimidine metabolism’ (Fig. 7).

Both DMR and DHMR-associated genes

A total of 141 genes were found with both 5-mC and 5-hmC changes in at least two patients. KEGG pathway analysis for these 141 genes identified five major pathways involved (‘Cell cycle’, ‘Pathway in cancer’, ‘Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis’, ‘Melanoma’ and ‘Prostate cancer’) were enriched (adjp<0.05). Ten interconnected and enriched genes (PCNA, MDM2, STAG1, E2F4, FGF4, FGF19, RHOBTB2, UBE2QL1, DCN and HSP90AA1) were revealed (Fig. 8).

Discussion

DNA methylation is one of the major epigenetic mechanisms that regulate gene expression in humans, and the alterations of methylation profiles are regarded as one of the major molecular aberrations in malignancies (23,24). Several studies of genome-wide DNA methylation have shown that the characteristic features of CpGs and certain microRNAs had differences in methylation levels between HCC and non-cancerous livers (25,26). Thus far, only a few studies have reported that DNA hydroxymethylation is associated with several human cancers (14,27), yet, the biological significance of 5-hmC in tumorigenesis remains unclear. In the present study we showed widespread alterations in DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in HCC tumor tissues and paired APTs. 5-mC and 5-hmC levels exhibited no significant differences between the groups, which might be due to the huge variation between HCC individuals. The strong features of this study include the highly sensitive method and high-throughput sequencing used, which enabled the non-biased mapping of aberrant (hydroxy) methylation sites between the tumor tissues and APTs, and distinguished the alternation of 5-mC from that of 5-hmC. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the genome-wide profiling of 5-mC and 5-hmC in HCC using this technique.

As is known, in the mammalian genome, methylation takes place only at cytosine bases that are located 5′ to a guanosine in a CpG dinucleotide, known as CpG islands. Most CpG islands are found in the proximal promoter regions (28). Methylation and demethylation in promoter region may regulate gene expression, playing important roles in biology process, especially in the development of tumors (25,29,30). The identification of genes that are specifically hypermethylated (which results in gene silencing) or hypomethylated (which results in increased transcription) might lead to the discovery of new factors that are important for tumor initiation and progression. In this study, we identified 1133 hypermethylated genes and 1663 hypomethylated genes in the promoter regions, many more than reported in a previous study (19), proving that MeDIP-seq has a better sensitivity than microarray, and more methylated sites can be found by using this novel technology. GO analysis showed they were enriched in various biological processes. Hypermethylation mostly gathered in ‘Regulation’-related biology processes, including ‘Regulation of RNA metabolic process’ (P=4.10E-05), ‘Regulation of kinase activity’ (P=8.80E-03) and ‘Regulation of transcription’ (P=9.40E-04). Although it is widely accepted that ‘DNA methylation suppresses gene expression’, this statement is an over-simplification. Methylation at the promoter regions can change the interactions between proteins and DNA, which can lead to the alterations in chromatin structure and either a decrease or an increase in the rate of transcription (31,32). We indeed found hypermethylation genes enriched in ‘protein-DNA complex assembly’ (P=9.40E-03). Furthermore, the position of the methylation change relative to the transcription start site is critical to the outcome (23). ‘Binding’ is another category where the hypermethylated genes are enriched, and it includes ‘DNA binding’ (P=4.60E-05), ‘Ion binding’ (P=1.20E-03) and ‘RNA binding’ (P=3.60E-02), which are accordant with the results of Zhai et al (33) In contrast, hypomethylation genes are enriched in totally different categories, such as ‘Plasma membrane’ (p=2.80E-05), ‘Cytoskeleton’ (P=9.70E-03) and ‘G-protein coupled receptor protein signaling pathway’ (P=4.60E-03).

Our KEGG pathway analysis identified some interesting pathways for hypermethylation. ‘Pathway in cancer’ contained genes such as CDKN2A and CDKN2B (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/2B) that are recognized as a tumor suppressor genes. The inactivation of CDKN2A/2B have been reported in several primary tumors (3436). There might be three different molecular mechanisms resulting in the loss of the CDKN2A/2B gene functions, namely homozygous deletions, point mutations, and transcriptional silencing by methylation at CpG islands. Methylation of CDKN2 has been observed in cell lines and cancer specimens derived from glioma, breast, colonic, head and neck cancers, hepatoblastoma, and in transitional cell carcinomas of the bladder (3739). Shen et al (40) used Illumina Methylated Arrays and pyrosequencing technique and indicated that CDKN2A may be a potential biomarker for early HCC diagnosis. Another important gene in this pathway is APC (adenomatous polyposis coli) which also is an important tumor associated gene. The profiling of gene promoter hypermethylation across human tumor types showed that APC promoter hypermethylation occurred in tumors including colon, breast, kidney, bladder, esophagus, stomach, pancreas and liver tumors (41). Furthermore, studies showed that high-level APC promoter methylation is a useful biomarker and predictor in esophageal adenocarcinoma, breast and prostate cancer (4244). Methylation of APC in HCC is frequent and occurs in a gene-specific and disease-specific manner. It was detected more frequently in hepatitis C virus-positive HCC (45,46). Other genes such as GSTP1 (Glutathione S-transferase P1) have also been found to be epigenetically silenced by promoter methylation, and associated with increased risk and shortened survival in patients with various tumors, including HCC, breast and prostate cancer (4749). Promoter methylation and epigenetic silencing of DAPK3 (death-associated protein kinase 3) and FADD [Fas (TNFRSF6)-associated via death domain] have not been studied in depth to the extent of those genes, and only a few studies implicated their participation in cancers such as oral squamous cell carcinoma and non-muscle invasive bladder carcinoma (5052). Their promoter methylation could also be a potential marker for HCC, and further studies are needed to confirm this. Other identified pathways such as ‘Cell cycle’ (PCNA, STAG1, YWHAZ, ORC1, TFDP2 and CDC23) and ‘Chemokine signaling pathway’ (GNG12, NRAS, ELMO1, PIK3R5, ADCY5, PRKCZ and PLCB4) are also considered to be important for the development and progression of malignant carcinoma, and the involved genes with their methylation status may provide potential novel biomarkers for HCC.

5-hmC is usually found in human embryonic stem (ES) cells and particularly abundant in certain genomic regions such as enhancers associated with histone modifications and other protein-DNA interaction sites based both on the information of gene expression and sequence composition (53). However, in human HCC tumor tissues and paired APTs, the locations of DHMRs seemed not to be significantly different among the whole genomic region. Although there is substantial evidence indicating that hydroxymethylation may be associated with actively transcribed genes, the exact biochemical mechanisms still remain enigmatic (54,55). Our GO analysis showed that compared with APTs, both high-level hydroxymethylated genes and hypomethylated genes in HCC tissues were enriched in the same pathways, namely the ‘Plasma membrane’ (P=3.10E-05) and ‘G-protein coupled receptor protein signaling pathway’ (P=3.60E-03), indicating that hydroxymethylation as a kind of demethylation may play similar or related roles with hypomethylation. In contrast, the downregulated hydroxymethylated genes are found mainly gathered in the ‘Cytosol’ (P=3.10E-02).

Although the KEGG pathway analysis for 5-hmC did not come up with as many enriched genes as that for 5-mC, they can still be categorized into a number of meaningful pathways. For instance, high level hydroxymethylated genes such as MMP9, SMAD4, FGF19, FGF3 and MEF2C were enriched in ‘Pathway in cancer’ and ‘MAPK signaling pathway’, while low level hydroxymethylated genes were mostly enriched in ‘Metabolic pathways’ and ‘Cell cycle’. ‘TGF-β signaling pathway’ related genes DCN, E2F4, TFDP1 also have strong correlations with tumors (5658). Since there have been few studies on the hydroxymethylation of these genes, more work is needed to fully elucidate the potential roles of hydroxy-methylation. Protein class analysis by PANTHER website showed that both DMR and DHMR-associated genes were in similar category, indicating that genes with hypermethylation or demethylation epigenetic changes tend to be coordinately regulated to participate in similar or related biology processes. Further work is warranted to test this hypothesis.

Over half a century ago, Warburg linked metabolism and cancer through enhanced aerobic glycolysis (59). This metabolic switch places the emphasis on producing intermediates for cell growth and division. The most rapidly growing tumor cell lines obtain up to 50% of their total ATP production from glycolytic metabolism, with a corresponding decrease in oxidative phosphorylation and in cell mitochondrial content (60,61). With numerous in-depth studies, the multi-faceted links between metabolism and cancer have now been revealed. Cellular metabolism is regulated by both oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in a number of key signaling pathways. Metabolism generates oxygen radicals, which contribute to oncogenic mutations. Activated oncogenes and loss of tumor suppressors in turn alter metabolism and induce aerobics (62). In the present study, we found several 5-mC and 5-hmC changed genes enriched in ‘Metabolic pathways’, and further analysis showed they were specifically clustered in ‘Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis’, ‘Oxidative phosphorylation’ and ‘Citrate cycle (TCA cycle)’ (Fig. 7), metabolic pathways were proven to be critical in controlling cancer cell survival and proliferation. Although the regulatory mechanisms underlying aerobic and glycolytic metabolic pathways are complex, our findings indicate that (hydroxy)methylation-based epigenetic modifications may affect the development of HCC through the regulation of cellular metabolism.

DNA methylation as a characterized epigenetic mechanism, its relationship with other biochemical pathways represents a critical stage in the elucidation of biological information processing. Some amino acid metabolism has been related to DNA methylation in tumors, such as homo-cysteine metabolism and the dynamics of methionine cycle (63,64). Accordingly, this study also found several 5-mC and 5-hmC changed genes that are associated with amino acid metabolism, including ‘Arginine biosynthesis’, ‘Cysteine and methionine metabolism’, ‘Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation’ and ‘Arginine and proline metabolism’ which may provide new clues for studying the relationship between (hydroxy)methylation and metabolism in HCC.

The present study found that a total of 141 genes have both 5-mC and 5-hmC changes in at least two of the HCC patients. KEGG pathway analysis showed five pathways (‘Cell cycle’, ‘Pathway in cancer’, ‘Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis’, ‘Melanoma’ and ‘Prostate cancer’) including ten genes (PCNA, MDM2, SAG1, E2F4, FGF4, FGF19, RHOBTB2, UBE2QL1, DCN and HSP90AA1) are enriched (Fig. 8). It is known for decades that, PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) acts as a central coordinator of DNA transactions by providing a multivalent interaction surface for factors involved in DNA replication, repair, chromatin dynamics, and cell cycle regulation (65), and is involved in the progression of tumors and highly altered in some tumors (66). Furthermore, studies have shown that the p21 protein negatively regulates targeting of DNA-MTase to the replication associated PCNA. They proposed that the presence of p21 prevents DNA-MTase access to replicating DNA, thereby impeding hypermethylation in normal cells (67). The present study indicated that (hydroxy) methylation of PCNA might be associated with HCC, which warrants further study. The 90-kDa heat shock protein HSP90AA1, another p21 regulator, has been found highly expressed in many cancers. Its mechanism in the tumorigenesis is varied (68,69). Here we provided evidence that methylation or hydroxymethylation of HSP90AA1 may play a crucial role in HCC. The epigenetic alterations of other identified genes such as MDM2, SAG, FGF4, FGF19, RHOBTB2 and DCN in HCC and other cancers also deserve further research.

One of the potential limitations of the present study is the sample size, which may not be sufficiently large. This is mainly due to the high cost of (h)MeDIP-seq, which precludes its application in a large scale. Nevertheless, we performed a rather comprehensive methylation and hydroxymethylation profiling of human HCC tumor tissues and paired APTs, and correlated multiple (hydroxy)methylation-altered genes with a number of important biological pathways. ‘Metabolic pathways’ are found to contain the largest number of (hydroxy) methylation-altered genes, indicating the crucial roles of metabolic processes (such as glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, oxidative phosphorylation and citrate cycle) in the occurrence and progression of HCC. Some of the identified (hydroxy) methylation-altered genes may serve as biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of HCC. Future studies with a larger sample size combined with a series of biochemical approaches hold the promise of elucidating the specific roles of epigenetic modifications in the pathogenesis of HCC.

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor Yingjie Wang for the helpful comments and language supports on this manuscript. The present study is supported by the Chinese High Tech Research and Development (863) Program (grant nos. 2012AA020204 and 2013AA020102) and the National S&T Major Project (grant no. 2012ZZX10002004-001).

References

1 

Bertino G, Demma S, Ardiri A, Proiti M, Gruttadauria S, Toro A, Malaguarnera G, Bertino N, Malaguarnera M, Malaguarnera M, et al: Hepatocellular carcinoma: Novel molecular targets in carcinogenesis for future therapies. BioMed Res Int. 2014:2036932014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Ishikawa T: Clinical features of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 16:2463–2467. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

3 

Bréchot C, Gozuacik D, Murakami Y and Paterlini-Bréchot P: Molecular bases for the development of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Semin Cancer Biol. 10:211–231. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Ma S, Jiao B and Liu X, Yi H, Kong D, Gao L, Zhao G, Yang Y and Liu X: Approach to radiation therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 36:157–163. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Lo CM, Ngan H, Tso WK, Liu CL, Lam CM, Poon RT, Fan ST and Wong J: Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 35:1164–1171. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, Ng IO, Liu CL, Lam CM and Wong J: Improving survival results after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective study of 377 patients over 10 years. Ann Surg. 234:63–70. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Jones PA and Baylin SB: The epigenomics of cancer. Cell. 128:683–692. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Paska AV and Hudler P: Aberrant methylation patterns in cancer: A clinical view. Biochem Med Zagreb. 25:161–176. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

9 

Robertson KD: DNA methylation and human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 6:597–610. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Globisch D, Münzel M, Müller M, Michalakis S, Wagner M, Koch S, Brückl T, Biel M and Carell T: Tissue distribution of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and search for active demethylation intermediates. PLoS One. 5:e153672010. View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Ruzov A, Tsenkina Y, Serio A, Dudnakova T, Fletcher J, Bai Y, Chebotareva T, Pells S, Hannoun Z, Sullivan G, et al: Lineage-specific distribution of high levels of genomic 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian development. Cell Res. 21:1332–1342. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

Tan L and Shi YG: Tet family proteins and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in development and disease. Development. 139:1895–1902. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Branco MR, Ficz G and Reik W: Uncovering the role of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in the epigenome. Nat Rev Genet. 13:7–13. 2011.PubMed/NCBI

14 

Haffner MC, Chaux A, Meeker AK, Esopi DM, Gerber J, Pellakuru LG, Toubaji A, Argani P, Iacobuzio-Donahue C, Nelson WG, et al: Global 5-hydroxymethylcytosine content is significantly reduced in tissue stem/progenitor cell compartments and in human cancers. Oncotarget. 2:627–637. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Moribe T, Iizuka N, Miura T, Kimura N, Tamatsukuri S, Ishitsuka H, Hamamoto Y, Sakamoto K, Tamesa T and Oka M: Methylation of multiple genes as molecular markers for diagnosis of a small, well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 125:388–397. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

16 

Lou C, Du Z, Yang B, Gao Y, Wang Y and Fang S: Aberrant DNA methylation profile of hepatocellular carcinoma and surgically resected margin. Cancer Sci. 100:996–1004. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Mardis ER: Next-generation DNA sequencing methods. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 9:387–402. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Shendure J and Ji H: Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nat Biotechnol. 26:1135–1145. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

19 

Shitani M, Sasaki S, Akutsu N, Takagi H, Suzuki H, Nojima M, Yamamoto H, Tokino T, Hirata K, Imai K, et al: Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation identifies novel cancer-related genes in hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 33:1307–1317. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Shen J, Wang S, Zhang YJ, Wu HC, Kibriya MG, Jasmine F, Ahsan H, Wu DP, Siegel AB, Remotti H, et al: Exploring genome-wide DNA methylation profiles altered in hepatocellular carcinoma using Infinium HumanMethylation 450 BeadChips. Epigenetics. 8:34–43. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar :

21 

Iyer P, Zekri AR, Hung CW, Schiefelbein E, Ismail K, Hablas A, Seifeldin IA and Soliman AS: Concordance of DNA methylation pattern in plasma and tumor DNA of Egyptian hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Exp Mol Pathol. 88:107–111. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

22 

Tan L, Xiong L, Xu W, Wu F, Huang N, Xu Y, Kong L, Zheng L, Schwartz L, Shi Y, et al: Genome-wide comparison of DNA hydroxymethylation in mouse embryonic stem cells and neural progenitor cells by a new comparative hMeDIP-seq method. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:e842013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Jones PA and Takai D: The role of DNA methylation in mammalian epigenetics. Science. 293:1068–1070. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

24 

Esteller M: Epigenetics in cancer. N Engl J Med. 358:1148–1159. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

25 

Shen J, Wang S, Zhang YJ, Kappil MA, Chen Wu H, Kibriya MG, Wang Q, Jasmine F, Ahsan H, Lee PH, et al: Genome-wide aberrant DNA methylation of microRNA host genes in hepatocellular carcinoma. Epigenetics. 7:1230–1237. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

26 

Nishida N, Nishimura T, Nakai T, Chishina H, Arizumi T, Takita M, Kitai S, Yada N, Hagiwara S, Inoue T, et al: Genome-wide profiling of DNA methylation and tumor progression in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Dis. 32:658–663. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

27 

Kudo Y, Tateishi K, Yamamoto K, Yamamoto S, Asaoka Y, Ijichi H, Nagae G, Yoshida H, Aburatani H and Koike K: Loss of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is accompanied with malignant cellular transformation. Cancer Sci. 103:670–676. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

28 

Bird A: DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 16:6–21. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

29 

Jones PA and Laird PW: Cancer epigenetics comes of age. Nat Genet. 21:163–167. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

30 

Jones PA and Baylin SB: The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer. Nat Rev Genet. 3:415–428. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

31 

Jones PL, Veenstra GJ, Wade PA, Vermaak D, Kass SU, Landsberger N, Strouboulis J and Wolffe AP: Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nat Genet. 19:187–191. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

32 

Gonzalgo ML, Hayashida T, Bender CM, Pao MM, Tsai YC, Gonzales FA, Nguyen HD, Nguyen TT and Jones PA: The role of DNA methylation in expression of the p19/p16 locus in human bladder cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 58:1245–1252. 1998.PubMed/NCBI

33 

Zhai JM, Yin XY, Hou X, Hao XY, Cai JP, Liang LJ and Zhang LJ: Analysis of the genome-wide DNA methylation profile of side population cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci. 58:1934–1947. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

34 

Cairns P, Mao L, Merlo A, Lee DJ, Schwab D, Eby Y, Tokino K, van der Riet P, Blaugrund JE and Sidransky D: Rates of p16 (MTS1) mutations in primary tumors with 9p loss. Science. 265:415–417. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar

35 

Okamoto A, Demetrick DJ, Spillare EA, Hagiwara K, Hussain SP, Bennett WP, Forrester K, Gerwin B, Serrano M and Beach DH: Mutations and altered expression of p16INK4 in human cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 91:11045–11049. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

36 

Rousseau E, Ruchoux MM, Scaravilli F, Chapon F, Vinchon M, De Smet C, Godfraind C and Vikkula M: CDKN2A, CDKN2B and p14ARF are frequently and differentially methylated in ependymal tumours. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 29:574–583. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

37 

Gonzalez-Zulueta M, Bender CM, Yang AS, Nguyen T, Beart RW, Van Tornout JM and Jones PA: Methylation of the 5′ CpG island of the p16/CDKN2 tumor suppressor gene in normal and transformed human tissues correlates with gene silencing. Cancer Res. 55:4531–4535. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

38 

Colot V and Rossignol JL: Isolation of the Ascobolus immersus spore color gene b2 and study in single cells of gene silencing by methylation induced premeiotically. Genetics. 141:1299–1314. 1995.PubMed/NCBI

39 

Iolascon A, Giordani L, Moretti A, Basso G, Borriello A and Della Ragione F: Analysis of CDKN2A, CDKN2B, CDKN2C, and cyclin Ds gene status in hepatoblastoma. Hepatology. 27:989–995. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

40 

Shen J, Wang S, Zhang YJ, Kappil M, Wu HC, Kibriya MG, Wang Q, Jasmine F, Ahsan H, Lee PH, et al: Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 55:1799–1808. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

41 

Esteller M, Corn PG, Baylin SB and Herman JG: A gene hypermethylation profile of human cancer. Cancer Res. 61:3225–3229. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

42 

Kawakami K, Brabender J, Lord RV, Groshen S, Greenwald BD, Krasna MJ, Yin J, Fleisher AS, Abraham JM, Beer DG, et al: Hypermethylated APC DNA in plasma and prognosis of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 92:1805–1811. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

43 

Van De Voorde L, Speeckaert R, Van Gestel D, Bracke M, De Neve W, Delanghe J and Speeckaert M: DNA methylation-based biomarkers in serum of patients with breast cancer. Mutat Res. 751:304–325. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

44 

Henrique R, Ribeiro FR, Fonseca D, Hoque MO, Carvalho AL, Costa VL, Pinto M, Oliveira J, Teixeira MR, Sidransky D, et al: High promoter methylation levels of APC predict poor prognosis in sextant biopsies from prostate cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 13:6122–6129. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

45 

Nishida N, Nagasaka T, Nishimura T, Ikai I, Boland CR and Goel A: Aberrant methylation of multiple tumor suppressor genes in aging liver, chronic hepatitis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 47:908–918. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

46 

Yang B, Guo M, Herman JG and Clark DP: Aberrant promoter methylation profiles of tumor suppressor genes in hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 163:1101–1107. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

47 

Fang C, Wei XM, Zeng XT, Wang FB, Weng H and Long X: Aberrant GSTP1 promoter methylation is associated with increased risk and advanced stage of breast cancer: A meta-analysis of 19 case-control studies. BMC Cancer. 15:9202015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

48 

Zelic R, Fiano V, Zugna D, Grasso C, Delsedime L, Daniele L, Galliano D, Pettersson A, Gillio-Tos A, Merletti F, et al: Global hypomethylation (LINE-1) and gene-specific hypermethylation (GSTP1) on initial negative prostate biopsy as markers of prostate cancer on a rebiopsy. Clin Cancer Res. 22:984–992. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

49 

Liu D, Wu J, Liu M, Yin H, He J and Zhang B: Downregulation of miRNA-30c and miR-203a is associated with hepatitis C virus core protein-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in normal hepatocytes and hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 464:1215–1221. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

50 

Saberi E, Kordi-Tamandani DM, Jamali S and Rigi-Ladiz MA: Analysis of methylation and mRNA expression status of FADD and FAS genes in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 19:e562–e568. 2014.PubMed/NCBI

51 

Friedrich MG, Chandrasoma S, Siegmund KD, Weisenberger DJ, Cheng JC, Toma MI, Huland H, Jones PA and Liang G: Prognostic relevance of methylation markers in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 41:2769–2778. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

52 

Brognard J, Zhang YW, Puto LA and Hunter T: Cancer-associated loss-of-function mutations implicate DAPK3 as a tumor-suppressing kinase. Cancer Res. 71:3152–3161. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

53 

Stroud H, Feng S, Morey Kinney S, Pradhan S and Jacobsen SE: 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine is associated with enhancers and gene bodies in human embryonic stem cells. Genome Biol. 12:R542011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

54 

Ficz G, Branco MR, Seisenberger S, Santos F, Krueger F, Hore TA, Marques CJ, Andrews S and Reik W: Dynamic regulation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse ES cells and during differentiation. Nature. 473:398–402. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

55 

Ito S, D'Alessio AC, Taranova OV, Hong K, Sowers LC and Zhang Y: Role of Tet proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification. Nature. 466:1129–1133. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

56 

Mlakar V, Berginc G, Volavsek M, Stor Z, Rems M and Glavac D: Presence of activating KRAS mutations correlates significantly with expression of tumour suppressor genes DCN and TPM1 in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 9:2822009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

57 

Nevins JR: The Rb/E2F pathway and cancer. Hum Mol Genet. 10:699–703. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

58 

Yasui K, Okamoto H, Arii S and Inazawa J: Association of over-expressed TFDP1 with progression of hepatocellular carcinomas. J Hum Genet. 48:609–613. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar

59 

Warburg O: On the origin of cancer cells. Science. 123:309–314. 1956. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

60 

Pedersen PL: Tumor mitochondria and the bioenergetics of cancer cells. Prog Exp Tumor Res. 22:190–274. 1978. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

61 

Nakashima RA, Paggi MG and Pedersen PL: Contributions of glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation to adenosine 5′-triphos-phate production in AS-30D hepatoma cells. Cancer Res. 44:5702–5706. 1984.PubMed/NCBI

62 

Levine AJ and Puzio-Kuter AM: The control of the metabolic switch in cancers by oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Science. 330:1340–1344. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

63 

Ulrey CL, Liu L, Andrews LG and Tollefsbol TO: The impact of metabolism on DNA methylation. Hum Mol Genet. 14:R139–R147. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

64 

Hoffman RM: Altered methionine metabolism, DNA methylation and oncogene expression in carcinogenesis. A review and synthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 738:49–87. 1984.PubMed/NCBI

65 

Chiang CP, Lang MJ, Liu BY, Wang JT, Leu JS, Hahn LJ and Kuo MY: Expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in oral submucous fibrosis, oral epithelial hyperkeratosis and oral epithelial dysplasia in Taiwan. Oral Oncol. 36:353–359. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

66 

Lv Q, Zhang J, Yi Y, Huang Y, Wang Y, Wang Y and Zhang W: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen has an association with prognosis and risks factors of cancer patients: A systematic review. Mol Neurobiol. Nov 12–2015.(Epub ahead of print). View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

67 

Chuang LS, Ian HI, Koh TW, Ng HH, Xu G and Li BF: Human DNA-(cytosine-5) methyltransferase-PCNA complex as a target for p21WAF1. Science. 277:1996–2000. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

68 

Whitesell L and Lindquist SL: HSP90 and the chaperoning of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 5:761–772. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

69 

Workman P and Powers MV: Chaperoning cell death: A critical dual role for Hsp90 in small-cell lung cancer. Nat Chem Biol. 3:455–457. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

August-2016
Volume 49 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1019-6439
Online ISSN:1791-2423

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Ye C, Tao R, Cao Q, Zhu D, Wang Y, Wang J, Lu J, Chen E and Li L: Whole-genome DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation profiling for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Oncol 49: 589-602, 2016.
APA
Ye, C., Tao, R., Cao, Q., Zhu, D., Wang, Y., Wang, J. ... Li, L. (2016). Whole-genome DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation profiling for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. International Journal of Oncology, 49, 589-602. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2016.3535
MLA
Ye, C., Tao, R., Cao, Q., Zhu, D., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Lu, J., Chen, E., Li, L."Whole-genome DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation profiling for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma". International Journal of Oncology 49.2 (2016): 589-602.
Chicago
Ye, C., Tao, R., Cao, Q., Zhu, D., Wang, Y., Wang, J., Lu, J., Chen, E., Li, L."Whole-genome DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation profiling for HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma". International Journal of Oncology 49, no. 2 (2016): 589-602. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2016.3535