Anticarcinogenic effects of water extract of sporoderm-broken spores of Ganoderma lucidum on colorectal cancer in vitro and in vivo
- Authors:
- Published online on: March 29, 2017 https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2017.3939
- Pages: 1541-1554
-
Copyright: © Na et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death around the world, with roughly 1.4 million new cases and nearly 700,000 deaths per year (1). According to research prediction, colon cancer cases will increase to 2.2 million, and the number of deaths may reach 1.1 million by 2030 (1). To date, the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer is not completely elucidated. Many factors including age, family heredity, diet, inflammation, and obesity may all contribute to the development and progression of colorectal cancer (2). Besides surgery, the current means of treating colorectal cancer mainly are radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy, which are associated with unwanted side effects and leading to decreased life quality of patients. Therefore, the development of safe and effective novel anticolorectal cancer agents from nature is urgently needed.
In recent years, natural products have been widely studied by researchers for their remarkable effects and less side effect in the prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer. For example, xanthones extracted from Garcinia mengostana inhibited colon cancer tumorigenesis both in vivo and in vitro (3). Resveratrol, mainly found in grapes, has been shown to prevent the development and progression of colorectal tumors by downregulating Kras expression (4). Besides results from laboratory studies, a number of clinical trials also demonstrated that nature compounds along or as supplements have potential in treating colorectal cancer (5,6). These studies suggest that nature compounds may serve as promising anticancer agents in the prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer.
Ganoderma lucidum (G. lucidum), also known as Lingzhi or Reshi, is a traditional Chinese medicine that has been used in East Asian countries for promoting health and longevity for over thousands of years (7). In the past few decades, many researchers studied the biological function and examined the responsible active components of G. lucidum. Many studies reported that G. lucidum has numerous pharmacological effects, including immunomodulatory, antiallergenic, anti-oxidative, cardiovascular protective, antidiabetic, and antitumor effects (8,9). Modern uses of G. lucidum include treatment of coronary heart diseases, arteriosclerosis, hepatitis, arthritis, nephritis, asthma, bronchitis and cancer (9). A diverse group of active compounds including polysaccharide, triterpenoids, alkaloids, fatty acids, lactones, steroids and others were identified and isolated from G. lucidum (10). In recent years, much attention has been focused on G. lucidum polysaccharide (GLP), a structurally diverse class of biological macromolecules, which contribute to numerous pharmacological effects of G. lucidum. In particular, the antitumor effects of GLP have attracted much attention.
A substantial number of studies demonstrated that GLP inhibited carcinogenesis in many types of cancer, including liver (11), breast (12,13), leukemia (14), ovarian (15), lung (16,17), and colorectal cancer (18). Early studies suggest that the anti-carcinogenic effects of GLP may be due to its immunomodulatory activity (19). In addition, the study of anticancer mechanisms of GLP was mainly restricted to GLP extracted from fruiting body of G. lucidum or mycelia cultivated in liquid culture medium. Recently, with the advance in sporoderm-breaking technology, much attention has been paid to chemical components of the sporoderm-broken spores of G. lucidum (BSGL) and their versatile biological activities. One study found that the spores of G. lucidum contain a large amount of bioactive substances and have a higher bioactivity than the fruiting bodies of G. lucidum (20). Another study showed the amount of polysaccharide of sporoderm-broken spores is 1.7 times that of unbroken ones (21). Research has suggested that the growth inhibition rate of BSGL on HepG2 cells was significantly higher than unbroken ones (22). These studies suggest that BSGL may serve as promising anticancer agent for cancer chemoprevention and therapy.
In this study, we examined the effects and mechanism of BSGL water extract (BSGLWE), which mainly contains GLP, on colorectal cancer development and progression in vitro and in vivo. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the effects of BSGLWE on colon cancer. Our data suggest that BSGLWE is effective against colorectal cancer development through regulating cell cycle, apoptosis, proliferation and necrosis.
Materials and methods
Materials
Hoechst 33342 was purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). [3-(4, 5-dimethylthia-zol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] (MTT) was obtained from HXBIO (Hangzhou, China). FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I and propidium iodide (Pi)/RNase staining kit were purchased from BD Pharmingen (San Diego, CA, USA). Polyclonal β-actin (#4967s), PARP (#9542), Bcl-2 (#2876s) antibodies; monoclonal caspase-3 (#9665), caspase-9 (#9508), Foxo3a (75D8) (#2497p) and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). The NAG-1 polyclonal rabbit antibody was generated in this laboratory as described before (23). Human GDF15/NAG-1 ELISA kit (NAG-1 also known as growth differentiated factor 15 GDF15) was from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). RNA extraction kit was from Aidlab Biotech (Beijing, China). The iScript cDNA synthesis kit and SYBR master mix were purchased from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA). The bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay kit was from Pierce (Rockford, IL, USA). The Western Lightening™ Plus-ECL Enhanced chemiluminescence Substrate assay kit was from Perkin-Elmer (Waltham, MA, USA).
Water extract preparation of BSGLWE
The powder of sporodum-broken spores of Ganoderma lucidum was purchased from Taian Zhenxin LLC (Shandong, China). The polysaccharides from the powder of sporoderm-broken spores of G. lucidum were extracted by hot water extraction method. Briefly, 5 g of sporoderm-broken spores of G. lucidum powder was placed in 100 ml of double distilled water, and stirred (300 rpm) at 70°C for 12 h. The solution was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 min to remove insoluble materials. The supernatant was concentrated and freeze-dried using H051 freeze dryer, ScanVac (LaboGene, Lynge, Denmark). For subsequent cell culture experiment, the powder of sporoderm-broken spores of G. lucidum water extract (BSGLWE) was dissolved in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) from Gibco (Gaithersburg, ML, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) as stock solution of 10 mg/ml, and then passed through 0.22-µm filter and diluted to required concentrations.
Cell culture
Human colorectal cancer cell line HCT116 was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, VA, USA). Cells were maintained in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37°C in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. For experiments, cells were seeded in serum-containing medium and at 60–80% confluence, cells were treated with BSGLWE at different concentrations and treated for certain time adjusted by each experiment.
Cell viability assay
Cell viability was assessed by MTT assay. Briefly, cells (1×104) were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated in DMEM medium containing 10% FBS until cells reach 50% confluence. HCT116 cells were than treated with 0, 1.25, 2.5, 5, and 7.5 mg/ml BSGLWE for 24, 48 and 72 h. Then MTT solution (5 mg/ml) was added and incubated for an additional 4 h. After incubation, supernatants were removed and the remaining water-insoluble formazan crystals were dissolved in 150 µl DMSO for 10 min with gentle shacking. The optical density was measured at 490 nm using a multi-well plate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). The percentage of viability was calculated and compared with that of the control cells without BSGLWE treatment. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of BSGLWE was calculated as the 50% decrease in the optical density compared to untreated controls.
Hoechst 33342 staining
Nuclear fragmentation was examined by Hoechst 33342. Briefly, HCT116 cells treated with BSGLWE at 0, 1.25, 2.5, 5, 7.5 mg/ml for 24 h, and cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 (10 µg/ml) for 15 min at room temperature. Cells were observed using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus).
Flow cytometric analysis of cell cycle and apoptosis
Flow cytometric assay was used for cell cycle and apoptosis assays. Briefly, for cell cycle determination, equal numbers of HCT116 cells (2×105) were seeded in 6-well plate per well and incubated with different concentration of BSGLWE (0, 5, 7.5 mg/ml) for 36 h. The cells were washed with PBS and then collected, and fixed in 70% ice cold ethanol, and storage at −20°C for at least 2 h. Cells were then washed with PBS twice, and centrifuged for 10 min at 1200 rpm and aspirate the supernatant, and resuspended cells in 0.5 ml of PI/RNase staining buffer (BD Pharmingen) for 15 min at room temperature, and DNA content was immediately analyzed using Guava Easycyte HT flow cytometry system (Guava Technologies, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), and quantified using ModFit 3.2 software (Verity Software House, Topsham, ME, USA). For apoptosis examination, approximately 2×105 cells per well were also seeded in 6-well plates and treated with 0, 1.25, 2.5, 5, and 7.5 mg/ml BSGLWE for 24, 36 and 48 h. Cells were then collected and stained with Annexin V-FITC/PI at room temperature in the dark and then analyzed by flow cytometer (Guava Technologies, Merck KGaA). The percentage of Annexin V−/PI+ (necrosis), Annexin V+/PI− (early apoptosis) and Annexin V+/PI+ (late apoptosis) cells were calculated according to manufacturer's instruction (BD Pharmingen). Samples were subsequently analyzed by flow cytometer (Merck Millipore Corp., Darmstadt, Germany).
In vivo tumor xenograft study
All the experimental procedures were conducted following the Guide for the Use and Care of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. This study was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Zhejiang Chinese medical university (Permit Number: SYXK 2012–0002). All procedures in this protocol are in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act Regulations. Four-week-old male BALB/C nude mice were kept in Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) environment. After 2 weeks of adaptation, mice were randomly divided by weight. HCT116 cells were injected subcutaneously (s.c.) into the left flank of each nude mouse (5×106 cells in 200 µl PBS). The mice were randomized into treatment and control groups: control group (saline, n=18), low dose (150 mg/kg, n=18), high dose (300 mg/kg, n=18), 5-FU treatment (20 mg/kg, n=8).
The day after injection of tumor cells, the high and low dose group mice were treated with BSGLWE intraperitoneally per day, while the control group mice were injected saline per day, and 5-FU was given every two days through intraperitoneal administration. However, 5-FU administration was reduced to every four days after a dramatic weight loss at 2 weeks after HCT116 cell injection. Tumor volume and body weights were measured twice a week and palpable tumors were measured in two dimensions (length and width) using a digital vernier caliper (0.01 mm). Tumor volume was calculated using the equation V (mm3) = length × width 2/2. Six weeks after injection, all mice were sacrificed. At necropsy, the xenograft tumors were carefully excised and weighed. Half of all tumors were fixed in 10% neutral formalin and processed for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemical staining. The rest of the tumor tissue was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C for subsequent analysis. Terminal blood was collected by cardiac puncture for the analysis of the circulating level of NAG-1/GDF15 secreted from HCT116 xenografts.
RNA exaction and quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was extracted from HCT116 cells and HCT116 xenograft tumors by RNA extraction kit as described by Aidlab Biotech. Both the quantity and quality of total RNA were analyzed by the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system. Total RNA (1 µg) was reverse transcribed with an iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad). Real-time PCR was performed to determine the expression of listed genes using SYBR PCR master mix (Bio-Rad) on CFX96 Real-time PCR system (Bio-Rad). β-actin was used as the reference gene for all samples. The PCR conditions consisted of 40 cycles, with 5 sec denaturation at 95°C, 30 sec annealing at 60°C and 5 sec extension at 65°C. The relative expression of mRNA for each sample was calculated as follows: ΔCt = Ct (sample) - Ct (β-actin), ΔΔCt (sample) = ΔCt (sample) −ΔCt (calibrator). The fold change in mRNA was calculated through relative quantification (2−ΔΔCt). Table I shows the primer sequences of all the primers used in this experiment.
Western blotting
Total protein from HCT116 cells and xenograft tumors were extracted using standard methods and protein concentrations were determined by BCA protein assay kit. A total of 40 µg of protein were loaded onto a 10 or 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and electrophoresed at 100 V for 2 h. Separated proteins were transferred onto a PVDF (polyvinylidene difluoride) membrane at 100 V for 2 h on ice. After transfer, membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in 1X TBST (Tris-buffered saline with Tween; 50 mmol/l of Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mmol/l of NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20) at room temperature for 1 h. The membrane was probed with NAG-1, Bcl-2, PARP, Foxo3a or β-actin primary antibodies overnight at 4°C and then secondary antibody at RT for 1 h according to manufacturer's instructions. The membrane was stripped using Restore Western Blot Stripping Buffer according to manufacturer's instruction. After stripping, the membrane was re-probed for β-actin as a loading control. The signals were detected using the Western Lightning Plus ECL-enhanced chemiluminescence substrate according to manufacturer's instruction. ImageJ 1.41 software (Bethesda, MD, USA) was used for the calculation of the optical density.
Enzyme-linked immune sobert assay
HCT116 cells (2×105 cells/well) were plated in 6-well plate and incubated at 37°C. After treatment with BSGLWE for 48 h, cell culture medium was collected for ELISA analysis. Total protein concentrations were determined by BCA assay in cell lysates. The quantification of GDF15/NAG-1 protein was determined using the Quantikine GDF15/NAG-1 ELISA kit (R&D). The concentration of NAG-1 in cell culture medium and serum of nude mice were determined by comparing their optical density to standard curve. Data were presented as normalized by protein concentration in cell culture medium or by tumor weights in serum of nude mice.
Immunohistochemistry
Formalin-fixed tumor tissues were embedded in paraffin and cut into 4-µm sections. The sections were then stained with H&E for pathological evaluation. The rest of the paraffin blocks were cut into 4-µm sections. The sections were deparaffinized using citric acid buffer (pH 6.0) and incubated for 8 min at 100°C. The slides were treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide to block endogenous peroxidase activity and then incubated with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 25 min. Next, the slides were incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-human primary antibodies: Bcl-2 (GB12008, 1/100 diluted in 1% BSA), Ki67 (GB13030-2, 1/1000 diluted in 1% BSA), PCNA (GB11010, 1/500 diluted in 1% BSA). All primary antibodies were obtained from Wuhan Goodbio Technology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). The slides were then incubated with 5 µg/ml biotinylated anti-goat IgG secondary antibody (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) for 50 min at room temperature. After washing, slides were stained with 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Dako), washed and counter-stained with hematoxylin, dehydrated, and then mounted with a coverslip. All images were captured using an inverted fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Japan).
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for all statistical analysis. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE). Differences between groups were examined for statistical significance by t-test. Two-sided P-values were calculated, and a value of P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
BSGLWE inhibits cell viability in a dose- and time-dependent manner
To explore the growth inhibitory potential of BSGLWE against colon cancer, HCT116 cells were treated with BSGLWE at various concentrations for 24, 48 and 72 h. MTT assays revealed that cell viability was significantly decreased upon BSGLWE treatment in a time- and dose-dependent manner in HCT116 cells (Fig. 1). Specifically, at 24 h, with the increase of BSGLWE from 0 to 7.5 mg/ml, cell viability decreased from 100 to 68.36% in HCT116 cells (p<0.001, Fig. 1A). This inhibitory effect was further enhanced upon 48 and 72 h of treatments (p<0.001, Fig. 1B and C). Using highest concentration as example, HCT116 cells treated with 7.5 mg/ml BSGLWE reduced cell proliferation to 68.36±3.02, 32.66±4.66 and 23.59±2.81% at 24, 48 and 72 h, respectively (p<0.001), suggesting that longer incubation with BSGLWE could markedly increase cytotoxicity of BSGLWE to HCT116 cells. The IC50 was determined to be 2.24 mg/ml and 2.40 mg/ml at 48 and 72 h, respectively (data not shown).
BSGLWE induces cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase
In order to investigate the anticancer mechanism of BSGLWE in HCT116 cells, we determined the effects of BSGLWE on cell cycle distribution by flow cytometry analysis. As shown in Fig. 2A and 2B, the ratio of HCT116 cells in G0/G1 phase slightly decreased upon BSGLWE treatments at non-significant level, while the ratio of cell population in S phase significantly decreased (p<0.05). Compared to control cells, BSGLWE significantly increased percentage of G2/M phase from 12.00±1.09 to 23.75±2.21% and to 32.20±8.85% upon 5 and 7.5 mg/ml of treatments, respectively (p<0.05, Fig. 2B).
To confirm this result, the expression levels of G2/M checkpoint regulators such as cyclin B1 and cyclin A2 were examined. As shown in Fig. 2C, the expression of cyclin B1 and cyclin A2 at mRNA levels were significantly downregulated by BSGLWE treatments (p<0.001). In addition, the mRNA level of P21, a cell cycle arresting protein, was significantly upregulated (p<0.001, Fig. 2C). Taken together, our results indicate that BSGLWE may inhibit HCT116 cell proliferation through regulating key genes involved in arresting cell cycle progression at G2/M phase.
BSGLWE induces apoptosis in vitro
To further elucidate the mechanism of cell death induced by BSGLWE in HCT116 cells, Hoechst 33342 staining was carried out. The changes in the cell nuclei were observed under the fluorescence microscope. As shown in Fig. 3A, the nuclei of HCT116 cells had blue fragmentation compared with control cells as indicated by distinct features of condensation, coagulation, and fragmentation of the nuclear chromatin, as well as typical apoptotic bodies as highlighted in circles (Fig. 3A). We also used flow cytometry analysis to further study the ability of BSGLWE in inducing apoptosis in HCT116 cells. As shown in Fig. 3B, we observed that the amount of Annexin V+/PI− (early apoptosis) and Annexin V+/PI+ (late apoptosis) stained cells were both increased significantly upon BSGLWE (1.25, 2.5, 5, and 7.5 mg/ml) treatments dose-dependently, and in a time-dependent manner at 24, 36 and 48 h (p<0.001). The rate of early and late apoptotic cells were quantified and depicted in Fig. 3C.
The relative mRNA expression levels of different regulatory genes involved in apoptosis were then determined by qRT-PCR. Treatment with different concentrations of BSGLWE (1.25–7.5 mg/ml) upregulated the expression of survivin and reduced the expression of Bcl-2 (p<0.001, Fig. 3D). However, the mRNA level of bax was not changed upon BSGLWE treatment (data not shown). Additionally, the expression of Bcl-2 at protein level was also reduced by BSGLWE at dose-dependent manner upon 48 and 72 h of treatments as determined by western blotting (Fig. 3F). In particular, higher concentrations of BSGLWE (5 and 7.5 mg/ml) seemed to have more effects then lower doses in inducing apoptosis in HCT116 cells.
In addition, BSGLWE treatment downregulated the pro-caspase-3 and pro-caspase-9 expression at protein levels as determined by western blotting in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 3F), suggesting caspase activation. We also found total PARP was cleaved and cleaved-PARP was significantly increased by BSGLWE in HCT116 cells at 48 and 72 h (Fig. 3F).
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-activated gene (NAG-1) or growth differentiated factor 15 (GDF15), a pro-apoptotic gene, is a divergent member of the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) superfamily (24). Previous studies have reported that NAG-1 plays an important role in inhibiting tumor growth (25–28). It has been well studied that many natural products demonstrate their anticancer effects through upregulating NAG-1 expression (24). Our previous studies and results from many other laboratories suggest that NAG-1 plays a key role in inhibiting cancer cell proliferation through inducing apoptosis (24,25). For example, Piyanuch et al demonstrated that berberine-induced apoptosis of colon cancer cells was through upregulating the expression of NAG-1 (29). Therefore, we also determined effects of BSGLWE on NAG-1 induction in HCT116 cells. As shown in Fig. 3E and F, BSGLWE significantly induced the expression of NAG-1 at both mRNA and protein levels (p<0.001). Since NAG-1 is a secreted protein, we used ELISA to quantify NAG-1 concentration in cell culture medium. After normalized by total protein concentration in cell lysates, our results showed a positive correlation between the secretion of NAG-1 in cell culture medium and the concentration of BSGLWE at 5 and 7.5 mg/ml (p<0.01) (Fig. 3G). However, low doses (1.25 and 2.5 mg/ml) of BSGLWE seemed not potent enough to induce NAG-1 secretion in HCT116 cells. Taken together, these results suggest that BSGLWE significantly induced apoptosis in colorectal cancer HCT116 cells through regulating key molecules involved in apoptosis cascades. NAG-1 may play an important role in BSGLWE-induced apoptosis and growth inhibition in HCT116 cells.
BSGLWE reduces tumor growth in colon cancer xenograft in nude mice
To evaluate the antitumor effects of BSGLWE in vivo, we examined the effects of low dose and high dose of BSGLWE (150 mg/kg vs. 300 mg/kg) by oral gavage on tumor growth in a mouse tumor xenograft model. 5-FU was used as positive control. Fig. 4A shows two representative photograph of the average size of the tumor volume from each group, which indicates reduced tumor volume in BSGLWE treated group compared with control group. Both lower dose and higher dose of BSGLWE inhibited HCT116 xenograft tumor growth and decreased the final tumor volume in dose-dependent manner by 23.8 and 47.8% (P<0.05), respectively (Fig. 4C). The final tumor weights at necropsy of the two doses were all significantly lower than control group (p<0.05, Fig. 4B). Final tumor weights of the four groups were 2.22±0.11 g (control), 1.27±0.19 g (150 mg/kg), 1.00±0.21 g (300 mg/kg) and 1.28±0.23 g (5-FU) (p<0.05) (Fig. 4B).
Compared with the control group, the body weight of BSGLWE treated mice did not change significantly, while the body weights of 5-FU treated group decreased significantly two weeks after injection (Fig. 4D). Therefore, we had to reduce the frequency of 5-FU administration to nude mice. In addition, no other adverse effects such as skin ulcerations or toxic death were observed in BSGLWE groups. This result suggests that BSGLWE may have less toxicity to mice compared to 5-FU.
In order to study how BSGLWE inhibited tumor development in vivo, we examined the expression of related genes and proteins that regulate the cell cycle, proliferation, and apop-tosis by qRT-PCR and western blotting in xenograft tumor samples. As shown in Fig. 4E, we found the relative expression of cell cycle inhibitors, P16 and the retinoblastoma gene (RB1) at mRNA levels, were significantly increased in 300 mg/kg BSGLWE treated tumors compared to controls, while the expression of P21, also a cell cycle inhibitor, was increased but at non-significant level. In addition, WEE1, E2F1 mRNAs were significantly decreased in HCT116 xenograft tumors upon BSGLWE treatments (p<0.05) (Fig. 4E). It was reported that WEE1 is upregulated in several types of cancer, and inhibition of WEE1 in tumor could cause mitotic catastrophe in glioblastoma cancer (30–32). E2F1 transcription factor plays a positive role in G1/S phase progression (33). Moreover, both mRNA and protein levels (as depicted in histograph) of FOXO3a, a cycle progression inhibitor, were significantly upregulated in xenograft tumors by BSGLWE treatment in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4E and H). The high expression of FOXO3a not only causes cell cycle stagnation in the mitotic phase, but also make the cells more susceptible to injury and apoptosis (34). We also examined the expression of cyclin D1 and cyclin B1, and found they were reduced upon BSGLWE treatment, but at non-significant levels (Fig. 4E). These results indicate that BSGLWE may inhibit HCT116 xenograft tumor development through inhibiting cell cycle progression.
In addition, we examined the expression of apoptosis related genes such as Bcl-2, TNF-α, NF-κB, HIF-1α, FADD, TRAF2, caspase-8 and c-FOS by qRT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 4F, BSGLWE significantly reduced the expression of anti-apoptosis genes including Bcl-2, NF-κB, and c-FOS in xenograft tumors compared to controls in a dose-dependent manner (p<0.05) (Fig. 4F), while the pro-apoptotic gene TNF-α, caspase-8, TRAF2, and FADD were significantly induced by BSGLWE. We also found PARP expression was downregulated slightly as determined by western blotting (p>0.05, Fig. 4G).
To further examine whether NAG-1 may also play a role in the antitumor effects of BSGLWE in vivo, we examined the expression of NAG-1 in xenograft tumors and serum samples. Interestingly, we found that NAG-1 protein expression was significantly upregulated in a dose-dependent manner in HCT116 xenograft tumors upon BSGLWE treatment (p<0.01, Fig. 4I). We then measured the concentration of NAG-1 in serum of tumor-bearing mice by ELISA, and found that after normalized by tumor weights, the relative concentration of NAG-1 protein was increased upon BSGLWE treatment with a significant upregulation by 300 mg/kg treatment (p<0.01, Fig. 4J).
Immunohistochemistry was done to determine expression of PCNA and Ki67, which are important cell nuclear proliferation markers. The expression of PCNA and Ki67 were markedly decreased in BSGLWE treatment groups dose-dependently compared with control group (Fig. 5A), indicating that the BSGLWE effectively inhibit proliferation of colon tumor cells in vivo. In addition, we found anti-apop-totic marker Bcl-2 was markedly reduced in tumor sections of BSGLWE treatment groups (Fig. 5B). Taken together, these data suggest that the inhibitory effects of BSGLWE on colorectal tumorigenesis in xenograft model may be through regulating key molecules involved in inhibition of cell proliferation, increase of cell cycle arrest and induction of apoptosis.
BSGLWE induces necrosis in nude mouse xenograft tumors
H&E was used to observe the pathological changes in xenograft tumors after different treatments. Compared with control group, the tumor necrosis area increased in the xenograft tumors treated with BSGLWE. The pictures indicate that BSGLWE obviously induced necrosis in a dose-dependent manner in the xenograft tumors compared with control group (Fig. 6A and B). The zoomed-in image from 300 mg/kg treated (Fig. 6A upper right image), necrotic area was mainly characterized by large blurred, massive, unstructured red-stained material, mixed with blue-stained nucleus fragments in the tumor tissue as compared with dark purple stained living cells in non-necrotic area (Fig. 6C and D).
Discussion
In recent years, the interest in natural compounds for prevention and treatment of cancer has increased. Various classes of anticancer agents derived from plants including alkaloids, saponins, polysaccharides, terpenoids and flavonoids have been extensively studied in laboratories and clinical investigations. The anticancer activities of the water-soluble extract of G. lucidum, which mainly contains GLP, has also been recognized. Available studies suggest that the anticancer mechanism of GLP may include immunomodulation (35,36), suppression of tumor angiogenesis (16), inhibition of cancer cell invasion and metastasis (37), inhibition of tumor cell proliferation and induction of tumor cell apoptosis (38), as well as reduction of the anticancer drug resistance (39). However, GLP is a mixture of peptidoglycan, glucose, heteropolysaccharide and other polysaccharides (8,10). Due to the complex structure of GLP and the limitation of separation and analysis, the composition of GLP has not yet been fully identified. Bioactive GLP has been isolated from the fruiting bodies of G. lucidum, from the mycelia cultivated in liquid culture medium, and from the spores of G. lucidum (19). Recently, studies found that the BSGL possesses more bioactive GLP than fruiting bodies of G. lucidum or mycelia and also showed more potent ability in inhibiting cancer cell growth than unbroken spores (20–22).
In this study, we demonstrate that BSGLWE (mainly contains GLP) is potent in inhibiting colorectal cancer cell growth and tumor development through causing cell cycle arrest, inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis both in vitro and in vivo. NAG-1 gene, which plays an important role in inhibiting carcinogenesis in many cancers, may be a key target of BSGLWE for its chemopreventive activity in colorectal cancer. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the anticarcinogenic effects and mechanisms exerted by BSGLWE in colorectal cancer, and first to show NAG-1 could be induced by BSGLWE in cancer cells.
Cancer is caused by the imbalance of cell proliferation and cell death, and is considered as a genetic disease that occurs with increased genetic instability involved in regulation of many cellular processes (13). These processes include proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, cell cycle progression and invasion (40). Cell cycle disorder is one of the main contributors to carcinogenesis (41,42). The normal cells operate in the exact chronological order through G1-S-G2-M phase under the precise control by cell cycle molecular network system (41,42). Deregulation of cell cycle would cause imbalance between cell proliferation and apoptosis, which may eventually lead to cancer. Our results suggest that BSGLWE could arrest cell cycle at G2/M phase as determined by flow cytometry in HCT116 cells. BSGLWE significantly decreased mRNA levels of cyclin A2, cyclin B1 and increased the expression of P21 in HCT116 cells. Both downregulation of cyclin A2 and cyclin B1 induced cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase (43). P21 has a wide range of kinase inhibitory activity inhibiting the activity of various cyclin-CDK complexes that cause primarily G1 arrest (44,45). However, some studies suggest that upon upregulation, P21 also plays an important role in G2/M arrest (46). These results suggest that BSGLWE may cause HCT116 cell G2/M phase arrest through upregulating P21 and downregulating cyclin A1 and cyclin B2. Consistent with our study, Zhao et al found that G. lucidum whole extract induced cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase in ovarian cancer cells (47). Wang et al found that GLP extracted from fruiting body of G. lucidum could inhibit breast cancer cell proliferation through G2/M phase cell cycle arrest (48). However, at present, no study examined effects of GLP extracted from sporoderm-broken spores on cell cycle arrest.
We also found that the expression of WEE1 and E2F were significantly downregulated while the expression of P16, FOXO3a and RB1 were significantly upregulated in the xenograft tumors of the nude mice upon BSGLWE treatment. P16 can compete with cyclin D1 binding to CDK6 or CDK4 and thus specifically inhibit CDK4 or CDK6 activity, eventually leading to cell cycle arrest at G1 phase (49,50). WEE1 is a key gene for G2/M phase arrest, inhibition or downregulation of WEE1 kinase could lead to mitotic catastrophe in glioblastoma cancer cells (31,32). E2F transcription factor and Rb gene family play an important role in regulating cell cycle progression from the G1 phase to the S phase (51). These results suggest that BSGLWE may cause cell cycle arrest at different check points in HCT116 xenograft tumors.
GLP has also been reported to induce apoptosis in several cancer cells (13,18). Apoptosis is regulated by a number of genes and is a precise process. In our study, BSGLWE downregulated the expression of Bcl-2, a key anti-apoptosis molecule, both in HCT116 cells and xenograft tumors as determined by western blotting, qRT-PCR and immunostaining. The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), an apoptosis marker, was cleaved both in HCT116 cells and xenograft tumors upon BSGLWE treatment. The transcription factors, Forkhead box O (FOXO) genes, are involved in multiple signaling pathways and play critical roles in a number of physiological and pathological processes, including cancer (52). One family member, FOXO3a, has been well defined to be involved in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induction, and FOXO3a induction is important for tumor suppression (53). In our study, BSGLWE treatment significantly increased FOXO3a expression both at mRNA and total protein levels in xenograft tumors, suggesting FOXO3a may be a potential molecular target of BSGLWE. Study by Dey et al demonstrated that both up regulation of mRNA and total protein levels of FOXO3a, but not the phosphorylated form, play a key role in 3β-Adiol-induced apoptosis in prostate cancer cells (54). As mentioned earlier, transcription factor NF-κB and cytokine TNF-α both play a key role in cellular processes including inflammation, apoptosis and cell cycle arrest.
Several studies have demonstrated that there is a signaling interplay between FOXO3a, TNF-α, and NF-κB in regulating physiological and pathological diseases (55–57). For example, Lee et al found that FOXO3a promoted remarkable apoptosis in human endothelial cells (HUVECs) through upregulating of TNF-α and suppression of NF-κB (58). Correlating with these observations, we found BSGLWE also increased TNF-α expression and decreased NF-κB expression in xenograft tumors, suggesting that the FOXO3a-TNF-α-NF-κB network may also be important molecular targets for BSGLWE induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in colorectal cancer. However, apoptosis is a complex biological process which can be divided into two paths: the extrinsic and the intrinsic pathways, function via mitochondrial and death receptor, respectively (59). In this study, we found that BSGLWE also induced FADD, TRAF2, and caspase-8 expression, key regulators of death-receptor-induced apoptosis pathway, suggesting a more complex regulation of apoptosis by BSGLWE during colorectal cancer carcinogenesis. More studies are needed to further differentiate the two pathways and the exact regulating mechanisms elicited by BSGLWE.
In the xenograft tumor study, we found both high and low doses of BSGLWE treatment significantly reduced xenograft tumor size and tumor weights compared to control group. At 0–4 weeks, the difference of tumor size was not quite obvious between treatment and control group. However, the growth rate of tumors in BSGLWE groups, especially the 300 mg/kg group, was significantly slowed down at the fifth week until end of the study. These results suggest that BSGLWE may be more effective in inhibiting colorectal tumor progression at late stage but not being quite effective in inhibiting the initiation and early development of colorectal cancer in this study. This observation may also suggest a long-term treatment with BSGLWE might be necessary for colorectal cancer prevention and therapeutic purpose in clinical practices. In agreement with our study, Shi and Qing (60) found that long-term treatment with G. lucidum significantly reduced death rate in late phase cancer patients as compared with short-term treatment (9). Few clinical studies in general suggest that G. lucidum is safe to either normal population or patients with disease (61,62). However, the safety and potential toxicity of long-term use of G. lucidum for therapeutic purpose or prevention purpose need to be evaluated in future studies.
Cell death has been mainly categorized into apoptosis, autophagy and necrosis based on morphological features and biochemical characteristics. Recently, a growing number of studies indicate necroptosis, distinct from apoptosis and necrosis, as a new mechanism of cell death (63). Cells can readily switch from one form of death to another (64). In this study, we found that the xenograft tumor of mice treated with BSGLWE showed more necrosis in a dose-dependent manner than the control group as depicted in Fig. 6. Necrosis is often observed in the internal regions of tumors where nutrient and oxygen supplies are limited (65). Necrosis is considered to be a form of cell death characterized by early plasma membrane permeabilization and organelle swelling and is accompanied by a significant inflammatory response (66). Traditionally, apoptosis and autophagy were considered as the most prominent cell death or cell death-related mechanisms (67). By now, multiple other cell death modalities such as necrosis were described and necrosis is recognized to be most likely involved in the response to chemotherapeutic treatments (67). Other than inducing apoptosis or autophagy as their anticancer mechanisms, many natural compounds including genistein, curcumin and Berberine have been reported to induce necrosis in cancer cells as reviewed by Gali-Muhtasib et al (68). It is reported that approximately 90% of cancer patients die of metastasis due to the resistance of cancer cells to apoptosis inducing drugs (69). Kim et al reported that for prognosis, the higher the rate of necrosis area adjusted by tumor volume after chemotherapy the better the prediction of metastasis-free survival of localized osteosarcoma patients (70). Therefore, it is critical to discover anticancer drugs that induce alternative modes of cell death such as necrosis for cancer chemoprevention and therapy. Our results suggest that BSGLWE could induce both apoptosis and necrosis in HCT116 xenograft tumors and thus slow down the rate of tumor growth.
Body weight change is important in evaluating toxicity and side effects of a chemotherapy drug or nature product in animal studies. Our study indicates that BSGLWE had no negative effects on body weights of nude mice. During the study, tumor-bearing mice in control group began to lose weight (a hallmark of cachexia) at the fifth week and body weights of control group were lowest among all groups at the end of study. Cachexia is common in cancer patients and is characterized by weight loss due to skeletal muscle wasting and fat depletion (71). Cachexia causes weakness, immobility, low tolerance to anticancer therapy, and poor quality of life, which significantly contributes to cancer-related deaths in cancer patients (71). In contrast, the body weights of 150 and 300 mg/kg BSGLWE treated mice maintained a continuous increase of body weight throughout the whole experiment, suggesting BSGLWE may have a beneficial effect on attenuating cancer-induced cachexia in nude mice.
It is worth noting that lower dose of BSGLWE (150 mg/kg) may even have a protective effect since the body weight of this group was maintained at the highest level among all groups throughout the study. On the contrary, 5-FU, a commonly used chemotherapy agent, markedly induced weight loss and severe side effects in nude mice two weeks after injection of HCT116 cells. Therefore, we had to reduce the frequency of 5-FU administration to nude mice at week 2. Surprisingly, we found that after reducing 5-FU administration, tumor growth rate sharply accelerated at week 5, suggesting relapse may occur upon reduction of 5-FU treatment. However, BSGLWE at either low or high doses did not show any of the side effects or signs of weight loss, indicating that BSGLWE might be a safer anticancer agent compared to 5-FU.
The combination of benefit without toxicity represents the desired end result in the development of effective therapeutic agents. G. lucidum has been used for thousands of years as a health promotion and treatment strategy. Other than studies from laboratories, there are also some published reports of human trials in the assessment of G. lucidum for treating several diseases, including cancer. In the process of clinical treatment of cancer, G. lucidum spore powder is combined with anticancer drugs to reduce reaction with radiotherapy and chemotherapy in patients. G. lucidum used as one of the component of a Chinese medicine herb complex which significantly improved immune function, overall health and ability to fight cancer in patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy medications (72).
A recent meta-analysis which included five randomized controlled trials (RTC) with a total of 373 cancer patients showed that patients who had been given G. lucidum alongside chemo/radiotherapy were more likely to respond positively compared to chemo/radiotherapy alone (RR 1.50; 95% CI 0.90–2.51, P=0.02) (73). Among these five RTCs, four studies showed that patients treated with G. lucidum had relatively improved quality of life compared to controls (73). Our study also showed that BSGLWE protected tumor-bearing mice from weight loss and reduced the degree of malignancy compared to 5-FU or control groups. However, evidence from well-designed human clinical trials is still scarce. In addition, one question is whether antitumor effects of G. lucidum is a direct activity or is mediated through effects on immune system modulation, which still is a key question to be addressed in future studies (19). Therefore, more clinical human trials are needed to better understand the bioactivity of G. lucidum, especially GLP from the sporoderm-broken spores. Investigation can progress in order to use G. lucidum as new nutraceutical or drug for the prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer in near future.
NAG-1, a pro-apoptotic gene, is a divergent member of TGF-β superfamily. Many studies have shown that NAG-1 acts as a tumor suppressor protein by inhibiting tumor growth and inducing apoptosis in the early stages of cancer (24–27). NAG-1 induction may be associated with cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in a variety of cancer cells (24–27). NAG-1 is up regulated in human colorectal cancer cells by several NSAIDs, as well as by dietary compounds including resveratrol, genistein, diallyl disulfide, conjugated linoleic acid, green tea catechins, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), indole-3-carbinol, capsaicin and other anticancer agents (24). In this study, BSGLWE upregulated the expression of NAG-1 both in vitro and in vivo which have never been reported before.
In HCT116 cell culture medium, NAG-1 concentration was increased dose-dependently upon BSGLWE treatment as compared to control cells. In nude mice, the source of serum NAG-1 was derived from human HCT116 cells. We found NAG-1 protein secreted into serum of nude mice was also induced upon BSGLWE treatment. Laboratory studies overall suggest that NAG-1 has an anticancer effect in many types of cancer primarily through induction of apoptosis (24). However, clinical studies have shown that the expression of NAG-1 in cancer patient, including colon cancer, were elevated, especially positively correlated with tumor stage and grade (24,74). Unfortunately, the exact role of NAG-1 during tumorigenesis in cancer patients is unknown. In agreement with results from laboratory studies, our study suggests that NAG-1 induction by BSGLWE may play a partial role in BSGLWE-induced apoptosis and cell death in colorectal cancer. However, more studies are needed to definitively determine whether the BSGLWE-induced cell death in HCT116 cells is through NAG-1 induction.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that BSGLWE significantly inhibited colorectal cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth through deregulating expression of the key molecules of cell cycle, apoptosis and proliferation as depicted in Fig. 7. BSGLWE induced NAG-1 expression in HCT116 cancer cells and NAG-1 induction may be closely related to reduced cell viability and increased apoptosis and possibly cell cycle arrest upon BSGLWE treatment as modeled in Fig. 7. To our knowledge this is the first study showing that BSGLWE could inhibit cell proliferation in colorectal cancer cells, which may involve NAG-1 induction. However, definitive role of NAG-1 in BSGLWE induced cytotoxicity in colorectal cancer need to be further elucidated in future studies. Our results also indicate that BSGLWE may serve as a novel anticancer agent for colorectal cancer chemoprevention and therapy.
Abbreviations:
NAG-1 |
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-activated gene-1 |
GDF15 |
growth differentiation factor 15 |
BSGLWE |
sporoderm-broken spores of Ganoderma lucidum water extracts |
GLP |
Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharides |
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr Thomas Eling at National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) for critical reading of this manuscript. We wish to thank Yu Huang at Zhejiang Medical University animal facility for his kind help in animal care and technique support. This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81473397).
References
Arnold M, Sierra MS, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A and Bray F: Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut. 66:683–691. 2017. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Brenner H, Kloor M and Pox CP: Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 383:1490–1502. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Aisha AFA, Abu-Salah KM, Ismail Z and Majid AMSA: in vitro and in vivo anti-colon cancer effects of Garcinia mangostana xanthones extract. BMC Complement Altern Med. 12:1042012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Saud SM, Li W, Morris NL, Matter MS, Colburn NH, Kim YS and Young MR: Resveratrol prevents tumorigenesis in mouse model of Kras activated sporadic colorectal cancer by suppressing oncogenic Kras expression. Carcinogenesis. 35:2778–2786. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Afrin S, Giampieri F, Gasparrini M, Forbes-Hernandez TY, Varela-López A, Quiles JL, Mezzetti B and Battino M: Chemopreventive and therapeutic effects of edible berries: a focus on colon cancer prevention and treatment. Molecules. 21:1692016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shehzad A, Wahid F and Lee YS: Curcumin in cancer chemo-prevention: Molecular targets, pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and clinical trials. Arch Pharm (Weinheim). 343:489–499. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dan X, Liu W, Wong JH and Ng TB: A ribonuclease isolated from wild Ganoderma lucidum suppressed autophagy and triggered apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells. Front Pharmacol. 7:2172016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bishop KS, Kao CH, Xu Y, Glucina MP, Paterson RR and Ferguson LR: From 2000 years of Ganoderma lucidum to recent developments in nutraceuticals. Phytochemistry. 114:56–65. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Boh B, Berovic M, Zhang J and Zhi-Bin L: Ganoderma lucidum and its pharmaceutically active compounds. Biotechnol Annu Rev. 13:265–301. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wasser SP: Reishi or Ling Zhi (Ganoderma lucidum). Encyclopedia of Dietary Supplements. Coates PM, Blackman MR, Cragg GM, Levine M, Moss J and White JD: Marcel Dekker; New York: pp. 603–622. 2005 | |
Li A, Shuai X, Jia Z, Li H, Liang X, Su D and Guo W: Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharide extract inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma growth by downregulating regulatory T cells accumulation and function by inducing microRNA-125b. J Transl Med. 13:1002015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Loganathan J, Jiang J, Smith A, Jedinak A, Thyagarajan-Sahu A, Sandusky GE, Nakshatri H and Sliva D: The mushroom Ganoderma lucidum suppresses breast-to-lung cancer metastasis through the inhibition of pro-invasive genes. Int J Oncol. 44:2009–2015. 2014.PubMed/NCBI | |
Shang D, Li Y, Wang C, Wang X, Yu Z and Fu X: A novel polysaccharide from Se-enriched Ganoderma lucidum induces apoptosis of human breast cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 25:267–272. 2011. | |
Yang G, Yang L, Zhuang Y, Qian X and Shen Y: Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharide exerts anti-tumor activity via MAPK pathways in HL-60 acute leukemia cells. J Recept Signal Transduct Res. 36:6–13. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hsieh TC and Wu JM: Suppression of proliferation and oxidative stress by extracts of Ganoderma lucidum in the ovarian cancer cell line OVCAR-3. Int J Mol Med. 28:1065–1069. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Cao QZ and Lin Z-B: Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharides peptide inhibits the growth of vascular endothelial cell and the induction of VEGF in human lung cancer cell. Life Sci. 78:1457–1463. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sun LX, Li WD, Lin ZB, Duan XS, Li XF, Yang N, Lan TF, Li M, Sun Y, Yu M, et al: Protection against lung cancer patient plasma-induced lymphocyte suppression by Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharides. Cell Physiol Biochem. 33:289–299. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liang Z, Yi Y, Guo Y, Wang R, Hu Q and Xiong X: Chemical characterization and antitumor activities of polysaccharide extracted from Ganoderma lucidum. Int J Mol Sci. 15:9103–9116. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ferreira IC, Heleno SA, Reis FS, Stojkovic D, Queiroz MJ, Vasconcelos MH and Sokovic M: Chemical features of Ganoderma polysaccharides with antioxidant, antitumor and antimicrobial activities. Phytochemistry. 114:38–55. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Guo L, Xie J, Ruan Y, Zhou L, Zhu H, Yun X, Jiang Y, Lü L, Chen K, Min Z, et al: Characterization and immunostimulatory activity of a polysaccharide from the spores of Ganoderma lucidum. Int Immunopharmacol. 9:1175–1182. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Huang XL, Hui-Qin WU, Fang H and Lin XS: Analysis of polysaccharide from broken cellular wall and unbroken spore of Ganoderma lucidum. Chin Tradit Herbal Drugs. 37:813–816. 2006. | |
Zhao J, Qiu C, Li J, Fan J and Chen K: inhibitive effect of selenium-enriching wall-broken Ganoderma lucidum spore powder on HepG2 cells. Life Sci. 79:11292006. | |
Baek SJ, Kim KS, Nixon JB, Wilson LC and Eling TE: Cyclooxygenase inhibitors regulate the expression of a TGF-beta superfamily member that has proapoptotic and antitumorigenic activities. Mol Pharmacol. 59:901–908. 2001.PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang X, Baek SJ and Eling TE: The diverse roles of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug activated gene (NAG-1/GDF15) in cancer. Biochem Pharmacol. 85:597–606. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : | |
Kang SU, Shin YS, Hwang HS, Baek SJ, Lee SH and Kim CH: Tolfenamic acid induces apoptosis and growth inhibition in head and neck cancer: Involvement of NAG-1 expression. PLoS One. 7:e349882012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang X, Chrysovergis K, Bienstock RJ, Shim M and Eling TE: The H6D variant of NAG-1/GDF15 inhibits prostate xenograft growth in vivo. Prostate. 72:677–689. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Arafat K, Iratni R, Takahashi T, Parekh K, Al Dhaheri Y, Adrian TE and Attoub S: Inhibitory effects of salinomycin on cell survival, colony growth, migration, and invasion of human non-small cell lung cancer A549 and LNM35: Involvement of NAG-1. PLoS One. 8:e669312013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Liggett JL, Zhang X, Eling TE and Baek SJ: Anti-tumor activity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: Cyclooxygenase-independent targets. Cancer Lett. 346:217–224. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Piyanuch R, Sukhthankar M, Wandee G and Baek SJ: Berberine, a natural isoquinoline alkaloid, induces NAG-1 and ATF3 expression in human colorectal cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 258:230–240. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Guertin AD, Martin MM, Roberts B, Hurd M, Qu X, Miselis NR, Liu Y, Li J, Feldman I, Benita Y, et al: unique functions of CHK1 and WEE1 underlie synergistic anti-tumor activity upon pharmacologic inhibition. Cancer Cell Int. 12:452012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mir SE, De Witt Hamer PC, Krawczyk PM, Balaj L, Claes A, Niers JM, Van Tilborg AA, Zwinderman AH, Geerts D, Kaspers GJ, et al: In silico analysis of kinase expression identifies WEE1 as a gatekeeper against mitotic catastrophe in glioblastoma. Cancer Cell. 18:244–257. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vitale I, Galluzzi L, Castedo M and Kroemer G: Mitotic catastrophe: A mechanism for avoiding genomic instability. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 12:385–392. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ogawa H, Ishiguro K, Gaubatz S, Livingston DM and Nakatani Y: A complex with chromatin modifiers that occupies E2F- and Myc-responsive genes in G0 cells. Science. 296:1132–1136. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Burgering BM and Medema RH: Decisions on life and death: FOXO Forkhead transcription factors are in command when PKB/Akt is off duty. J Leukoc Biol. 73:689–701. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li WJ, Chen Y, Nie SP, Xie MY, He M, Zhang SS and Zhu KX: Ganoderma atrum polysaccharide induces anti-tumor activity via the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway related to activation of host immune response. J Cell Biochem. 112:860–871. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Xu Z, Chen X, Zhong Z, Chen L and Wang Y: Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharides: Immunomodulation and potential anti-tumor activities. Am J Chin Med. 39:15–27. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wu QP, Xie YZ, Li SZ, La Pierre DP, Deng Z, Chen Q, Li C, Zhang Z, Guo J, Wong C-KA, et al: Tumour cell adhesion and integrin expression affected by Ganoderma lucidum. Enzyme Microb Technol. 40:32–41. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sun Z, Huang K, Fu X, Zhou Z, Cui Y and Li H: A chemically sulfated polysaccharide derived from Ganoderma lucidum induces mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis in human osteosarcoma MG63 cells. Tumour Biol. 35:9919–9926. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li WD, Zhang BD, Wei R, Liu JH and Lin ZB: Reversal effect of Ganoderma lucidum polysaccharide on multidrug resistance in K562/ADM cell line. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 29:620–627. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hanahan D and Weinberg RA: Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 144:646–674. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Borgs L, Beukelaers P, Vandenbosch R, Belachew S, Nguyen L and Malgrange B: Cell 'circadian' cycle: New role for mammalian core clock genes. Cell Cycle. 8:832–837. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee B, Sandhu S and McArthur G: Cell cycle control as a promising target in melanoma. Curr Opin Oncol. 27:141–150. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hochegger H, Takeda S and Hunt T: Cyclin-dependent kinases and cell-cycle transitions: Does one fit all? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 9:910–916. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Abbas T and Dutta A: p21 in cancer: Intricate networks and multiple activities. Nat Rev Cancer. 9:400–414. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lim S and Kaldis P: Cdks, cyclins and CKIs: Roles beyond cell cycle regulation. Development. 140:3079–3093. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Niculescu AB III, Chen X, Smeets M, Hengst L, Prives C and Reed SI: Effects of p21 (Cip1/Waf1) at both the G1/S and the G2/M cell cycle transitions: pRb is a critical determinant in blocking DNA replication and in preventing endoreduplication. Mol Cell Biol. 18:629–643. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhao S, Ye G, Fu G, Cheng JX, Yang BB and Peng C: Ganoderma lucidum exerts anti-tumor effects on ovarian cancer cells and enhances their sensitivity to cisplatin. Int J Oncol. 38:1319–1327. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Wang J, Zhang L, Yu Y and Cheung PC: Enhancement of antitumor activities in sulfated and carboxymethylated polysaccharides of Ganoderma lucidum. J Agric Food Chem. 57:10565–10572. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Soták M, Sumová A and Pácha J: Cross-talk between the circadian clock and the cell cycle in cancer. Ann Med. 46:221–232. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Williams RT, Barnhill LM, Kuo HH, Lin WD, Batova A, Yu AL and Diccianni MB: Chimeras of p14ARF and 16: Functional hybrids with the ability to arrest growth. PLoS One. 9:e882192014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dyson N: The regulation of E2F by pRB-family proteins. Genes Dev. 12:2245–2262. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fu Z and Tindall DJ: FOXOs, cancer and regulation of apoptosis. Oncogene. 27:2312–2319. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nho RS and Hergert P: FoxO3a and disease progression. World J Biol Chem. 5:346–354. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dey P, Ström A and Gustafsson JÅ: Estrogen receptor β upregulates FOXO3a and causes induction of apoptosis through PUMA in prostate cancer. Oncogene. 33:4213–4225. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hoesel B and Schmid JA: The complexity of NF-κB signaling in inflammation and cancer. Mol Cancer. 12:862013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Chung HY, Lee EK, Choi YJ, Kim JM, Kim DH, Zou Y, Kim CH, Lee J, Kim HS, Kim ND, et al: Molecular inflammation as an underlying mechanism of the aging process and age-related diseases. J Dent Res. 90:830–840. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fluckiger A, Dumont A, Derangère V, Rébé C, de Rosny C, Causse S, Thomas C, Apetoh L, Hichami A, Ghiringhelli F, et al: Inhibition of colon cancer growth by docosahexaenoic acid involves autocrine production of TNFα. Oncogene. 35:4611–4622. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Lee HY, Youn SW, Kim JY, Park KW, Hwang CI, Park WY, Oh BH, Park YB, Walsh K, Seo JS, et al: FOXO3a turns the tumor necrosis factor receptor signaling towards apoptosis through reciprocal regulation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase and NF-kappaB. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 28:112–120. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Dasgupta A, Nomura M, Shuck R and Yustein J: Cancer's Achilles' Heel: Apoptosis and Necroptosis to the Rescue. Int J Mol Sci. 18:1–20. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Shi K-G and Qing L-H: The follow-up observation assessment of medium and late phases cancer treated by Chinese Ganoderma lucidum essence (CGLE). Ganoderma: Genetics, Chemistry, Pharmacology and Therapeutics - Proceedings of International Symposium on Ganoderma Research; 2002, http://cstm.cnki.net/stmt/TitleBrowse/KnowledgeNet/ZGYS200210001028?db=STMi8515. | |
Zhao H, Zhang Q, Zhao L, Huang X, Wang J and Kang X: Spore powder of Ganoderma lucidum improves cancer-related fatigue in breast cancer patients undergoing endocrine therapy: A pilot clinical trial. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012:8096142012. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Suprasert P, Apichartpiyakul C, Sakonwasun C, Nitisuwanraksa P and Phuackchantuck R: Clinical characteristics of gynecologic cancer patients who respond to salvage treatment with Lingzhi. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 15:4193–4196. 2014. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Chen D, Yu J and Zhang L: Necroptosis: An alternative cell death program defending against cancer. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1865:228–236. 2016.PubMed/NCBI | |
Feoktistova M, Wallberg F, Tenev T, Geserick P, Leverkus M and Meier P: Techniques to distinguish apoptosis from necroptosis. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2016:pdb.top070375. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zong WX and Thompson CB: Necrotic death as a cell fate. Genes Dev. 20:1–15. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kanduc D, Mittelman A, Serpico R, Sinigaglia E, Sinha AA, Natale C, Santacroce R, Di Corcia MG, Lucchese A, Dini L, et al: Cell death: Apoptosis versus necrosis (Review). Int J Oncol. 21:165–170. 2002.PubMed/NCBI | |
Diederich M and Cerella C: Non-canonical programmed cell death mechanisms triggered by natural compounds. Semin Cancer Biol. 40–41:4–34. 2016. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gali-Muhtasib H, Hmadi R, Kareh M, Tohme R and Darwiche N: Cell death mechanisms of plant-derived anticancer drugs: Beyond apoptosis. Apoptosis. 20:1531–1562. 2015. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Wilson TR, Johnston PG and Longley DB: Anti-apoptotic mechanisms of drug resistance in cancer. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 9:307–319. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kim MS, Lee SY, Cho WH, Song WS, Koh JS, Lee JA, Yoo JY and Jeon DG: Tumor necrosis rate adjusted by tumor volume change is a better predictor of survival of localized osteosarcoma patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 15:906–914. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Fearon KC, Glass DJ and Guttridge DC: Cancer cachexia: Mediators, signaling, and metabolic pathways. Cell Metab. 16:153–166. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zhuang SR, Chen SL, Tsai JH, Huang CC, Wu TC, Liu WS, Tseng HC, Lee HS, Huang MC, Shane GT, et al: Effect of citronellol and the Chinese medical herb complex on cellular immunity of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy/radiotherapy. Phytother Res. 23:785–790. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Jin X, Ruiz Beguerie J, Sze DM and Chan GC: Ganoderma lucidum (Reishi mushroom) for cancer treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 6:CD0077312012. | |
Khaled YS, Elkord E and Ammori BJ: Macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1: A review of its pleiotropic actions in cancer. Cancer Biomark. 11:183–190. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |