Older versus younger patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, and stomach: A pooled analysis of eight consecutive North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) trials

  • Authors:
    • Aminah Jatoi
    • Nathan R. Foster
    • James R. Egner
    • Patrick A. Burch
    • Philip J. Stella
    • Joseph Rubin
    • Shaker R. Dakhil
    • Daniel J. Sargent
    • Brian R. Murphy
    • Steven R. Alberts
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: March 1, 2010     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo_00000535
  • Pages: 601-606
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Whether elderly patients with metastatic esophageal, gastroesophageal, and gastric cancer do as well with chemotherapy as their younger counterparts was investigated in this pooled analysis. In total, 367 patients from 8 consecutive, first-line trials were included: i) etoposide + cisplatin; ii) 5-fluorourucil + leucovorin; iii) 5-fluorouracil + levamisole; iv) irinotecan; v) docetaxel + irinotecan; vi) oxaliplatin + capecitabine; vii) docetaxel + capecitabine; and viii) bortezomib + paclitaxel + carboplatin. One hundred and fifty-four (42%) patients were ≥65 years old (range: 65-86), and 213 younger (range: 20-64). Elderly patients had worse performance scores (2-3): 19 vs. 8% (p<0.0001). Rates of grade 3+ adverse events across all chemotherapy cycles in univariate and multivariate analyses (adjusted for gender, performance score, and stratified by individual study) were higher among elderly patients. Rates of neutropenia, fatigue, infection, and stomatitis in elderly vs. younger patients were 31 vs. 29% (p=0.02 by multivariate analyses); 15 vs. 5% (p=0.01); 9 vs. 4% (p=0.03); 6 vs. 1% (p=0.04). In contrast, duration of chemotherapy, overall survival, and progression-free survival were comparable. Although age should not preclude trial entry, these adverse event rates suggest a need to develop more tolerable regimens for older patients with these malignancies.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

March 2010
Volume 36 Issue 3

Print ISSN: 1019-6439
Online ISSN:1791-2423

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Jatoi A, Foster NR, Egner JR, Burch PA, Stella PJ, Rubin J, Dakhil SR, Sargent DJ, Murphy BR, Alberts SR, Alberts SR, et al: Older versus younger patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, and stomach: A pooled analysis of eight consecutive North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) trials. Int J Oncol 36: 601-606, 2010.
APA
Jatoi, A., Foster, N.R., Egner, J.R., Burch, P.A., Stella, P.J., Rubin, J. ... Alberts, S.R. (2010). Older versus younger patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, and stomach: A pooled analysis of eight consecutive North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) trials. International Journal of Oncology, 36, 601-606. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo_00000535
MLA
Jatoi, A., Foster, N. R., Egner, J. R., Burch, P. A., Stella, P. J., Rubin, J., Dakhil, S. R., Sargent, D. J., Murphy, B. R., Alberts, S. R."Older versus younger patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, and stomach: A pooled analysis of eight consecutive North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) trials". International Journal of Oncology 36.3 (2010): 601-606.
Chicago
Jatoi, A., Foster, N. R., Egner, J. R., Burch, P. A., Stella, P. J., Rubin, J., Dakhil, S. R., Sargent, D. J., Murphy, B. R., Alberts, S. R."Older versus younger patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction, and stomach: A pooled analysis of eight consecutive North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) trials". International Journal of Oncology 36, no. 3 (2010): 601-606. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo_00000535