Mechanisms behind COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition of tumor growth in vivo

  • Authors:
    • Hans Axelsson
    • Christina Lönnroth
    • Marianne Andersson
    • Kent Lundholm
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 1, 2010     https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo_00000766
  • Pages: 1143-1152
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) attenuate tumor net growth in clinical and experimental cancer. Evaluations in cell culture experiments have implied involvement of growth factor and G-protein related signaling pathways to explain decreased proliferation, angiogenesis, increased cell adhesion and apoptosis. Sparse information is however available from studies on growing tumors in vivo. The aim of the present study was to map alterations in selected signal proteins in relation to heterogeneous tissue expression of COX-2 in tumors during COX inhibition. MCG 101 cells were exposed to indomethacin treatment both in vivo and in vitro to reduce PGE2 production. Tumor tissue specimens were taken for immunohistochemical analyses and qPCR determinations. Protein markers were selected to reflect cell proliferation and cell cycling, angiogenesis and metastasis in relationship to COX-2 staining in tumor tissue. Indomethacin did not change overall COX-2 staining in tumor tissue, but altered its distribution towards increased staining in cell nuclei/nucleoli and decreased COX-2 staining heterogeneity in tumor tissue. P53 staining was decreased, while PCNA and TGFβ3 staining were increased by indomethacin in tumor areas with high presence of COX-2, which correlated to staining of BAX, TUNEL, Bcl-2, c-jun, p21, p27, p53 and NM23. Net tumor growth was predicted by EGF-R, p21 and p27 proteins in tumor tissue during indomethacin treatment (multivariate analysis). RNA transcript analyses showed decreased EGF-R and KRas expression in vivo, following indomethacin treatment, which also included KRas, PI3K, JAK1, STAT3 and c-jun, mRNAs in cultured tumor cells. In conclusion, our results extend earlier studies on cell culture experiments and demonstrate that EGF-R and downstream KRas pathways communicate effects of increased prostaglandin activity in tumor tissue in vivo.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

November 2010
Volume 37 Issue 5

Print ISSN: 1019-6439
Online ISSN:1791-2423

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Axelsson H, Lönnroth C, Andersson M and Lundholm K: Mechanisms behind COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition of tumor growth in vivo. Int J Oncol 37: 1143-1152, 2010.
APA
Axelsson, H., Lönnroth, C., Andersson, M., & Lundholm, K. (2010). Mechanisms behind COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition of tumor growth in vivo. International Journal of Oncology, 37, 1143-1152. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo_00000766
MLA
Axelsson, H., Lönnroth, C., Andersson, M., Lundholm, K."Mechanisms behind COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition of tumor growth in vivo". International Journal of Oncology 37.5 (2010): 1143-1152.
Chicago
Axelsson, H., Lönnroth, C., Andersson, M., Lundholm, K."Mechanisms behind COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition of tumor growth in vivo". International Journal of Oncology 37, no. 5 (2010): 1143-1152. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo_00000766