Mechanical thrombectomy for vertebral and basilar artery occlusions: An institutional experience with 17 patients
- Authors:
- Published online on: October 18, 2022 https://doi.org/10.3892/mi.2022.57
- Article Number: 32
-
Copyright: © Yu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License.
Abstract
Introduction
Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is one of the primary triggers of disability, as well as mortality worldwide with a substantial burden on health systems and families (1-3). AIS of the posterior circulation as a result of vertebrobasilar artery occlusions (VBAOs) constitutes 10-20% of all large vessel occlusions (LVOs) with a mortality rate of almost 90% and most frequently affecting the basilar artery (BA) (4-8). The posterior circulation mainly provides blood supply to the main parts of the brain, such as the brainstem, thalamus and cerebellum (9).
Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) administered within 4.5 h of the stroke is currently the recommend treatment for patients with thrombolytic ischemic strokes (10,11). Of note, mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for the treatment of acute thrombolytic ischemic stroke has exhibited favorable outcomes in both anterior and posterior LVOs (5,12-17). Almost all studies involving acute VBAO have focused primarily on prognostic factors, such as the severity of neurologic deficits, the time of onset to treatment, the location of the occlusion, the state of collaterals, treatment or management options, as well as timely reperfusion (18-21).
Prognosis is often poor with a high mortality rate when early reperfusion is not achieved in patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) (19,22). Thus, MT for patients with BAO has been shown to be associated with good clinical outcomes with a wide range of functional attainments (13,22). Although a few studies have demonstrated that flow reversal, as well as the patency of the vertebral arteries (VAs) may also affect the recanalization success, only a few studies have reported MT in vertebral artery occlusions (VAOs) (5,7,23,24). Factors associated with a good outcome have not yet been adequately investigated. Thus, the present study focused on factors associated with a good prognosis following MT.
Specifically, the precise association between reperfusion and outcome has not yet been fully established in patients with BAO and VAO. Thus, the present study describes the authors' institutional experience on MT for VAOs, as well as BAOs.
Patients and methods
Patients
The present study retrospectively analyzed a series of 17 patients with acute VAOs and BAOs treated using MT at the Department of Neurosurgery, Jiangyin Hospital (Jiangyin, China) from January, 2017 to December, 2020. The study was approved by the Research Committee of Jiangyin Hospital. Patients, as well as relatives were made aware of the intention to include them in a study during follow-up visits at the outpatient department. Written informed consents, as well as consents for publication were obtained from all the patients and the hospital. In all patients, information such as sex and age, time from admission to the onset of femoral artery access, the number of thrombi removed, the time of femoral artery access to recanalization, pre- and post-operative National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, pre- and post-operative thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) scores, as well as modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores were documented and analyzed. All patient information obtained is presented in Table I.
Table IClinical data of the 17 patients with acute ischemic stroke in the posterior circulation who underwent emergency stent mechanical thrombectomy. |
Indications and contraindications
The indications for MT included the following: i) The clinical diagnosis was in line with AIS of the posterior circulation, the patients were hospitalized within 24 h of onset, and the presence of neurological deficits related to posterior circulation ischemia, such as dizziness, gaze disturbance, visual field defect, visual impairment, coma, etc.; ii) a cerebrovascular evaluation with computer tomographic angiography (CTA) revealed that the BA and/or VA was occluded, and a head computer tomography (CT) scan ruled out intracranial hemorrhage; iii) the patient's family agreed to an informed consent and signed the surgical consent form.
The contraindications for MT were the following: i) A head CT scan indicated the presence of intracranial hemorrhage or large-area cerebral infarction in the posterior circulation (>2/3 of the pons or midbrain volume or cerebellar hemisphere infarction); ii) a history of active bleeding or a tendency to hemorrhage; iii) severe disability, mRS score >2 points; iv) severe renal insufficiency; v) the patient had a clear history of allergies to contrast agents.
Pre-operative evaluation
After the patient was admitted to hospital, a neurologist completed a physical examination, a neurological functional assessmen.t as well as NIHSS scoring in the emergency room. The emergency physician also performed a head CT scan to rule out intracranial hemorrhage, as well as a head and neck CTA to identify BAO (Fig. 1A and B) and/or VAO. In addition, pre-operative magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were performed in all patients to detect brainstem infarction. In all patients, the pre-operative CTA revealed the presence of large vessel occlusion, such as the BAO or VAO. The time from admission to the onset of femoral artery puncture/accesses was documented prior to the commencement of endovascular surgeries.
Anatomical divisions of the vertebrobasilar artery
The VA is characteristically divided into four segments, namely V1-V4 (25,26) as follows: V1, also denoted as the pre-foraminal segment (starts from the subclavian artery to the transverse foramen of C6); V2, also denoted as the foraminal segment (starts from the transverse foramen of C6 to the transverse foramen of C2); V3, also denoted as the atlantic, extradural or extraspinal segment (starts from C2, where the artery loops, turns lateral and upwards into the transverse foramen and progresses via C1 to penetrate the dura; V4, also denoted as the intradural or intracranial segment (starts from the dura at the lateral border of the posterior atlanto-occipital membrane to their convergence on the medulla to constitute the BA) (25,26).
Endovascular procedures
All procures were performed under general anesthesia. The entire surgical procedures were carried out strictly as previously described by Luo et al (8). After securing the femoral artery access, a 6F/8F guide catheters were maneuvered into the BA or the VAs via the subclavian arteries and initial angiographies performed to determine the locations of the occlusions (Fig. 1C). Using a coaxial system, 0.21-inch microcatheters (Rebar microcatheter; Covidien; Medtronic) and 0.014-inch microguide wires (Transend; Stryker) were advanced into the thrombi as far as the distal ends of the occluded vessels. Angiographies were then performed to confirm that the distal vasculars were patent and no pathology was found in the lumen.
In all patients, Solitaire ABs or FRs (EV3 Neurovascular) were utilized for the MT. The solitaire devices were carefully maneuvered to the occluded segments via microcatheters and the stent retrievers were unsheathed to allow for complete expansion through the thrombi. The devices often created bypasses that restored blood flow across the occluded segments. Again, angiography was performed to determine the patency of the distal arteries, after which the fully deployed the solitaire devices were resheathed. Thrombectomies were performed via the withdrawal of the solitaire devices and the delivery microcatheters as a single unit. In the case that the angiography revealed that the occluded arteries were patent (Fig. 1D), and blood flow rates were basically normal (TICI 2b and above), the procedures were then completed.
In the case that the angiography still revealed stenosis of the BA or VA and the anterior blood flow did not meet a TICI score of 2b, balloon angioplasty (GatewayTM, Boston Scientific Corporation) was then first performed. In the case that the angiography still revealed no patency, the stent placements were performed to ensure that the flow rates met the TICI score of ≥2b. In all patients who underwent the MTs, the number of thrombi removed were documented. In addition, the time from femoral artery puncture/access to the recanalization of the occluded arteries was documented.
Post procedure management, efficacy evaluation and follow-up
Heparin infusion was used during and immediately after the surgery. Intravenous tirofiban used during the surgery was also maintained after the surgery. Aspirin (300 mg) and clopidogrel (300 mg) were administered via the rectal route immediately after the surgery. All the patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for monitoring and treatment, and transferred to the general ward after their conditions were stable. In all patients, immediate post-operative CT scans were performed to rule bleeding 24 h after the surgery. CTAs were also performed to confirm recanalization (Fig. 1E). In addition, post-operative MRIs were performed to assess infarctions following the procedure (Fig. 1F).
Furthermore, in all patients, the TICI grade was scored as follows (22,27): 0, no recanalization (no perfusion or anterograde flow beyond the occlusion site); 1, minimal recanalization (contrast medium passes the area of occlusion but fails to opacify the entire cerebral bed distal to the obstruction during the angiographic run); 2, partial recanalization (2a, partial filling, <50% of territory visualized; 2b, partial filling, ≥50% of territory visualized); and 3, complete recanalization (total reperfusion with normal filling). At the ICU, the NIHSS scores of all the patients were assessed 7 days after the surgery.
mRS was also used to evaluate the prognosis of the patients up to 90 days after the surgery. The mRS scores were assessed as follows (22,28): 0, no symptoms; 1, no clinically relevant disability; 2, slight disability (able to look after own affairs without aid but not to a full extent); 3, moderate disability (requires some aid but able to walk unaided); 4, moderately severe disability (unable to attend to own bodily needs or to walk without aid); 5, severe disability (requires constant nursing care); and 6, deceased.
Results
Demographic and preoperative evaluations
A total of 17 patients were included in the present analysis. Among these, 13 patients were males while 4 were females. Their ages ranged from 34-75 years, with an average age of 60 years. The time from the onset of admission to the femoral artery puncture/access was 3.0-8.0 h, with an average time of 5.5 h. The basic clinical information of the 17 patients is presented in Table I. In all the patients, pre-operative MRIs did not reveal brainstem infarction subsequent to their surgeries.
Anatomical distribution of lesions
Out of the 17 patients, 11 patients had BAOs while 6 patients had VAOs (Table II). In addition, out of the 6 patients with VAOs, five occlusions were observed on the left side, while one occlusion was observed on the right side. Furthermore, out of the out of the 6 patients with VAOs, four occlusions were observed at the V1 segment of the VA, one at the V2 segment and one at the V4 segment. Thus, in the present study, there were more patients with BAOs than VAOs. More patients also had V1 occlusions compared to V2 and V4 occlusions. No patient had a V3 segment occlusion.
Table IIStratification of patients as per the type of artery occluded, recanalization rate and the functional outcomes of patients. |
Operative outcomes
After 1-7 times of MT with Solitaire AB, 70.6% (12/17) of the patients achieved complete recanalization (TICI 2b or 3); 17.4% (3/17) achieved partial recanalization (TICI 2a), while 11.7% (2/17) of the patients achieved minimal recanalization (TICI 1). Out of the 11 patients with BAOs, 72.7% (8/11) achieved a successful recanalization (TICI 2b or 3), while out of the 6 patients with VAOs, 66.7% (4/6) achieved a successful recanalization (mTICI 2b or 3). No notable differences in recanalization (TICI 2b or 3) were observed between the patients with BAO and VAOs (Table II). The average time from femoral artery puncture/access to recanalization was 172 min. No notable differences were observed between the time from femoral artery puncture/access to recanalization and prognosis. This may be due to the small sample size of the study. All the 12 patients who achieved successful recanalization of the arteries (TICI 2b or 3) survived after their surgery. Out of the 3 patients who achieved partial recanalization (TICI 2a), 1 patient had severe stenosis of the BA with acute occlusion and balloon dilation at the stenotic portion resulted in rupture and bleeding of the BA and subsequently in mortality after the surgery.
The other 2 patients had larger areas of cerebral infarctions after the surgery, and decompressive craniostomies were performed to allow for brain expansion, as well as brain hernias and 1 patient succumbed. The 2 patients with TICI 2a who succumbed had occlusions in the BA. The 2 patients who achieved minimal recanalization (TICI 1) succumbed immediately after their surgeries. These 2 patients had occlusions in the V1 and V2 segments of the VA. All the deceased patients succumbed immediately after the surgeries (<24 h). The average number of thrombi removed was three. In addition, the average time from femoral artery puncture/access to recanalization was 178 min. Thus, an average time of ~5.5 h from patient admittance to recanalization with a 70.6% recanalization rate with an overall good functional outcome of 58.8% at 90 days suggests that, patients whose surgeries were performed within 5 h of admittance still have hope for recanalization compared to an initial 1.5 h average time for recanalization.
Efficacy evaluation and follow-up outcomes
The average NIHSS score prior to surgery was 15.3, while the average NIHSS score at 1 week after the surgery was 4.5. Observationally, there was a marked improvement in patient outcomes when comparing the NIHSS before surgery to the NIHSS at 1 week after the surgery. The prognoses of the patients were assessed at 90 days post-surgery using the mRS. A good prognosis was defined as a mRS score ≤2 (Table II). It was observed that (Table I) 41.17% (7/17) of the patients had mRS scores of 0 and 1 (good prognosis). In addition, 29.41% (5/17) of the patients had mRS scores of 2 and 3 (mild to moderate disability). Furthermore, 5.8% (1/17) of the patients had mRS scores of 4 and 5 (severely disability), and 23.53% (4/17) of the patients had a mRS score of 6 (deceased).
Out of the 11 patients with BAOs, 54.5% (6/11) achieved a good functional outcome (mRS 0-2), while out of the 6 patients with VAOs, 66.7% (4/6) achieved a good functional outcome (mRS 0-2). The overall good functional outcome in the patients was 58.8% (10/17) as per the mRS score range of 0-2 (Table II). In addition, a mortality rate of 23.53% was observed and the causes of death were as a result of intraoperative procedural complications. At 2 years of follow-up, the patients with favorable outcomes revealed no further neurological deficits and massive improvements in their quality of life. No patients were lost during follow-up.
Discussion
The effectiveness of MT in posterior circulation stroke is still confronted with uncertainty, notwithstanding the successful outcomes in large vessel anterior circulation stroke (6,12,15,16,18,29). Overall, out of the 17 patients in the present study, BAOs were observed in 64.7% (11/17) of the patients, while in 35.3% (6/17) of the patients had VAOs. Furthermore, 70.6% of the patients achieved recanalization (TICI 2b-3), with 41.17, 29.41 and 29.41% of the patients attaining a good prognosis, mild to moderate disability and severely disability, respectively as per the mRS scores. The overall good functional outcome of the patients was 58.8% (10/17) as per the mRS score range of 0-2. The patients were predominantly males with a mean age of 60 years.
Sonig et al (30) reported a series of 12 BAOs treated with retrievable MT and achieved a successful recanalization (TICI 2b or 3) of 91.7% (11/12) in their patients with a median mRS scores 2 at discharge and 1 at last follow-up. In addition, Kang et al (31) demonstrated a successful reperfusion of 90.3% in patients with acute BAOs who underwent MT with retrievable stents and achieved a favorable functional outcome of 46.9% (mRS 0-2) of their patients. Furthermore, Gory et al (22) attained 72.2% effective recanalization (TICI 2b or 3) or reperfusion in their patients with a favorable functional outcome of 34% (mRS 0-2) and a 2-5% risk of hemorrhage. Baik et al (18) achieved an overall successful reperfusion rate of 78% with a favorable clinical outcome of 37% in their patients.
In the present study, out of the 11 patients with BAOs, 72.7% (8/11) achieved a successful recanalization (TICI 2b or 3) with a good functional out of 54.5% (6/11) as per the mRS score range of 0-2. In addition, out of the 6 patients with VAOs, 66.7% (4/6) achieved a successful recanalization (TICI 2b or 3) with a functional out of 66.7% (4/6) as per the mRS score range of 0-2. None of the patients presented with bilateral VAOs or tandem VA-BA occlusions. Tandem VA-BA occlusions although rare, have been reported in 16-20% of patients with acute VBAOs (6,18,32).
The initial symptomatology of the patients with neurological deficits related to posterior circulation ischemia, was dizziness, gaze disturbance, visual field defect, visual impairment or coma. A CT scan and CTA were the initial radiological modalities use in assessing the patient at the emergency after clinical assessments. A CT scan was used to rule out intracranial hemorrhage, while CTA was used to detect the BA and VA occlusions. Nevertheless, magnetic resonance diffusion weighted image is often the ‘gold standard’ radiological modality for the detection of ischemic changes in patients with LVO in the posterior circulation (5,33). Intraoperatively, angiographies are utilized to confirm occlusions, as well as to assess the patency of distal arteries.
The NIHSS is a beneficial and realistic means of assessing stroke severity in patients (5,34). It is devised to evaluate stroke symptoms associated with the anterior circulation with more emphasis on the limb, as well as speech impairments and less focus on cranial nerve symptomatology (5,35). Nevertheless, patients with LVO in the posterior circulation can have an NIHSS score of 0, with symptoms such as headaches, vertigo, as well as nausea only in the prodromal period. Furthermore, the baseline NIHSS score signifies a clinical evaluation of the collateral state, as well as thrombus severity (5,19). Thus, a low NIHSS score upon admission may be due small thrombi or good collaterals leading to positive outcomes following MT (5). Gory et al (36) observed that patients who present with a high NIHSS score had a poorer prognosis compared to patients with mild-to-moderate deficits at the time of treatment, notwithstanding recanalization and thus, they proposed an NIHSS cut-off value of 13. The present study revealed that the average NIHSS score prior to surgery was 15.3, while the average NIHSS score at 1 week after the surgery was 4.5. Thus, observationally, there was a notable improvement in outcomes when comparing the NIHSS before surgery to the NIHSS at 1 week after surgery. These findings are therefore consistent with those of the previous studies mentioned above.
Solitaire thrombectomy for AIS treatment is instinctively practical, very auspicious, and is already used in several institutions (37-39). Miteff et al (37) revealed that Solitaire thrombectomy attained a high rate of recanalization which translated into the good prognosis of patients with acute stroke caused by proximal occlusion within the cerebral arteries. Using Solitaire AB, Luo et al (8) achieved an overall recanalization rate of 89.9%, and 36.2% of their patients achieved a favorable outcome at 90 days. Furthermore, other studies have demonstrated that, on average, ~81% of patients often attain a recanalization rate of ~30%, attaining favorable outcomes at 90 days (13,37,40). The present study used Solitaire AB or FR to treat 17 patients with BAOs and VAOs and attained a 70.6% recanalization rate with an overall good functional outcome of 58.8% at 90 days; these finding are comparable to those of the aforementioned previous studies. The average number of thrombi removed in the present case series was three.
Luo et al (8) indicated that the collateral status prior to MT, as well as the baseline NIHSS score were independent predictors of mortality at 90 days in patients with acute posterior circulation stroke who underwent Solitaire AB thrombectomy. Studies have demonstrated that the reperfusion time is one of the key predictors of a good prognosis of patients with anterior circulation, as well as posterior circulation stroke (5,12-14,41). Nevertheless, other studies have not found any link between the reperfusion time and good prognosis of patients with posterior circulation strokes (5,19,42,43). Baik et al (18) observed a poor outcome despite the good recanalization rate, which may have been due to the longer procedural time.
Baik et al (18) observed a mortality rate of 21%. Luo et al (8) observed a mortality rate of 24.6% at 90 days. Similar studies observed mortality rates ranging from 21-33% at 90 days (5,22,30,31). The present study observed a mortality rate of 23.53% and the causes of death were intraoperative procedural complications. The present study anticipated a better prognosis and less or no mortality in patients with VAOs, as there are two VAs and the patent one can compensate the occluded one, as compare to BAOs. Comparatively, MT often results in higher recanalization rates than t-PA therapy; however, better outcomes with MT are not always exhibited (12,18,44). The present study had certain limitations as this was a retrospective study with small case series, which did not allow for satisfactory conclusions, as a detailed statistical analysis could not be performed for the majority of variables; thus, statistical analyses were not performed. In addition, the study was conducted in a single hospital. Thus, further prospective studies with larger sample sizes and several hospitals are warranted to arrive at satisfactory conclusions.
In conclusion, the present study observed a notable improvement in patient outcomes comparing the NIHSS before surgery to the NIHSS at 1 week after surgery. Thus, a lower NIHSS score prior to MT may be a good prognostic factor. Herein, recanalization rate of 70.6% with an overall good functional outcome of 58.8% at 90 days was attained, which is comparable to that of previous studies (as those aforementioned). An average time of ~5.5 h from patient admittance to recanalization with a 70.6% recanalization rate and an overall good functional outcome of 58.8% at 90 days suggests that, patients whose surgeries are performed within 5 h of admittance, still have hope of recanalization compared to the initial 1.5 h average time for recanalization.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Funding: No funding was received.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
XY, YF, JJ, ZX, WM and SAR were involved in the conception and design of the study, in data acquisition and follow-up, and in the editing of the manuscript. SAR was involved in the preparation of the manuscript. All authors have carefully reviewed the manuscript and have read and approved the final version. XY and WM confirm the authenticity of all the raw data.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Jiangyin Hospital [Approval no. 2016ER (058)] and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
Patient consent for publication
Written informed consents as well as consents for publication were obtained from all the patients and the hospital.
Competing interests
All authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
Massari F, Henninger N, Lozano JD, Patel A, Kuhn AL, Howk M, Perras M, Brooks C, Gounis MJ, Kan P, et al: ARTS (aspiration-retriever technique for stroke): Initial clinical experience. Interv Neuroradiol. 22:325–332. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Rha JH and Saver JL: The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: A meta-analysis. Stroke. 38:967–973. 2007.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Fargen KM, Meyers PM, Khatri P and Mocco J: Improvements in recanalization with modern stroke therapy: A review of prospective ischemic stroke trials during the last two decades. J Neurointerv Surg. 5:506–511. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Styczen H, Fischer S, Yeo LL, Yong-Qiang Tan B, Maurer CJ, Berlis A, Abdullayev N, Kabbasch C, Kastrup A, Papanagiotou P, et al: Approaching the boundaries of endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke: Multicenter experience with mechanical thrombectomy in vertebrobasilar artery branch occlusions. Clin Neuroradiol. 31:791–798. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Pazuello GB, de Castro-Afonso LH, Fornazari VR, Nakiri GS, Abud TG, Monsignore LM, Dias FA, Martins-Filho RK, Camilo MR, Aléssio-Alves FF, et al: Thrombectomy for posterior circulation stroke: Predictors of outcomes in a Brazilian registry. World Neurosurg. 147:e363–e372. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Baik SH, Jung C, Kim BM and Kim DJ: Mechanical thrombectomy for tandem vertebrobasilar stroke: Characteristics and treatment outcome. Stroke. 51:1883–1885. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Boeckh-Behrens T, Pree D, Lummel N, Friedrich B, Maegerlein C, Kreiser K, Kirschke J, Berndt M, Lehm M, Wunderlich S, et al: Vertebral artery patency and thrombectomy in basilar artery occlusions. Stroke. 50:389–395. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Luo G, Mo D, Tong X, Liebeskind DS, Song L, Ma N, Gao F, Sun X, Zhang X, Wang B, et al: Factors associated with 90-day outcomes of patients with acute posterior circulation stroke treated by mechanical thrombectomy. World Neurosurg. 109:e318–e328. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sciacca S, Lynch J, Davagnanam I and Barker R: Midbrain, pons, and medulla: Anatomy and syndromes. Radiographics. 39:1110–1125. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Memon MZ, Kushnirsky M, Brunet MC, Saini V, Koch S and Yavagal DR: Mechanical thrombectomy in isolated large vessel posterior cerebral artery occlusions. Neuroradiology. 63:111–116. 2021.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, Brown M, Demaerschalk BM, Hoh B, et al: 2018 Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke. 49:e46–e110. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Schonewille WJ, Wijman CA, Michel P, Rueckert CM, Weimar C, Mattle HP, Engelter ST, Tanne D, Muir KW, Molina CA, et al: Treatment and outcomes of acute basilar artery occlusion in the basilar artery international cooperation study (BASICS): A prospective registry study. Lancet Neurol. 8:724–730. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gory B, Eldesouky I, Sivan-Hoffmann R, Rabilloud M, Ong E, Riva R, Gherasim DN, Turjman A, Nighoghossian N and Turjman F: Outcomes of stent retriever thrombectomy in basilar artery occlusion: An observational study and systematic review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 87:520–525. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Giorgianni A, Biraschi F, Piano M, Mardighian D, Gasparotti R, Frigerio M, Pero G, Quilici L, Crispino M, Pellegrino C, et al: Endovascular treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion: Registro endovascolare lombardo occlusione basilar artery (RELOBA) study group experience. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 27:2367–2374. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Meinel TR, Kaesmacher J, Chaloulos-Iakovidis P, Panos L, Mordasini P, Mosimann PJ, Michel P, Hajdu S, Ribo M, Requena M, et al: Mechanical thrombectomy for basilar artery occlusion: Efficacy, outcomes, and futile recanalization in comparison with the anterior circulation. J Neurointerv Surg. 11:1174–1180. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Zeng Q, Tao W, Lei C, Dong W and Liu M: Etiology and risk factors of posterior circulation infarction compared with anterior circulation infarction. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 24:1614–1620. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Matsumoto H, Nishiyama H, Tetsuo Y, Takemoto H and Nakao N: Initial clinical experience using the two-stage aspiration technique (TSAT) with proximal flow arrest by a balloon guiding catheter for acute ischemic stroke of the anterior circulation. J Neurointerv Surg. 9:1160–1165. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Baik SH, Park HJ, Kim JH, Jang CK, Kim BM and Kim DJ: Mechanical thrombectomy in subtypes of basilar artery occlusion: Relationship to recanalization rate and clinical outcome. Radiology. 291:730–737. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Singer OC, Berkefeld J, Nolte CH, Bohner G, Haring HP, Trenkler J, Gröschel K, Müller-Forell W, Niederkorn K, Deutschmann H, et al: Mechanical recanalization in basilar artery occlusion: The ENDOSTROKE study. Ann Neurol. 77:415–424. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Cross DT III, Moran CJ, Akins PT, Angtuaco EE and Diringer MN: Relationship between clot location and outcome after basilar artery thrombolysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 18:1221–1228. 1997.PubMed/NCBI | |
Voetsch B, DeWitt LD, Pessin MS and Caplan LR: Basilar artery occlusive disease in the New England medical center posterior circulation registry. Arch Neurol. 61:496–504. 2004.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gory B, Mazighi M, Blanc R, Labreuche J, Piotin M, Turjman F and Lapergue B: Mechanical thrombectomy in basilar artery occlusion: Influence of reperfusion on clinical outcome and impact of the first-line strategy (ADAPT vs stent retriever). J Neurosurg. 129:1482–1491. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Mayer TE, Hamann GF and Brueckmann HJ: Treatment of basilar artery embolism with a mechanical extraction device: Necessity of flow reversal. Stroke. 33:2232–2235. 2002.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Clarençon F, Blanc R, Gallas S, Hosseini H and Gaston A: Thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion by using double Merci retriever devices and bilateral temporary vertebral artery flow reversal. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 111:53–56. 2009.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Campero A, Rubino PA and Rhoton AL: Anatomy of the vertebral artery. In: Pathology and surgery around the vertebral artery. Springer, Paris, pp29-40, 2011. | |
George B and Cornelius J: Vertebral artery: Surgical anatomy. Oper Tech Neurosurg. 4:168–181. 2001. | |
Schulz UG and Fischer U: Posterior circulation cerebrovascular syndromes: Diagnosis and management. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 88:45–53. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Olavarría VV, Brunser A, Cabral N, Martins S, Muñoz-Venturelli P, Cavada G and Lavados PM: The distribution of the modified Rankin scale scores change according to eligibility criteria in acute ischemic stroke trials: A consideration for sample size calculations when using ordinal regression analysis. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 5:133–136. 2017.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, Dippel DW, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, Dávalos A, Majoie CB, van der Lugt A, de Miquel MA, et al: Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: A meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 387:1723–1731. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Sonig A, Krishna C, Natarajan SK, Liu J, Hopkins LN, Snyder KV, Levy EI and Siddiqui AH: Stent retriever-assisted mechanical thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion: Single US institution experience. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 12:250–259. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kang DH, Jung C, Yoon W, Kim SK, Baek BH, Kim JT, Park MS, Kim YW, Hwang YH, Kim YS, et al: Endovascular thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion: A multicenter retrospective observational study. J Am Heart Assoc. 7(e009419)2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Cohen JE, Leker RR, Gomori JM, Eichel R, Rajz G, Moscovici S and Itshayek E: Emergent revascularization of acute tandem vertebrobasilar occlusions: Endovascular approaches and technical considerations-confirming the role of vertebral artery ostium stenosis as a cause of vertebrobasilar stroke. J Clin Neurosci. 34:70–76. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Werner MF, López-Rueda A, Zarco FX, Blasco J, San Román L, Amaro S, Carrero E, Valero R, Oleaga L, Macho JM and Bargalló N: Value of posterior circulation ASPECTS and pons-midbrain index on non-contrast CT and CT angiography source images in patients with basilar artery occlusion recanalized after mechanical thrombectomy. Radiologia (Engl Ed). 61:143–152. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar : (In English, Spanish). | |
Chalos V, van der Ende NAM, Lingsma HF, Mulder MJHL, Venema E, Dijkland SA, Berkhemer OA, Yoo AJ, Broderick JP, Palesch YY, et al: National institutes of health stroke scale: An alternative primary outcome measure for trials of acute treatment for ischemic stroke. Stroke. 51:282–290. 2020.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kayan Y, Meyers PM, Prestigiacomo CJ, Kan P and Fraser JF: Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery. Current endovascular strategies for posterior circulation large vessel occlusion stroke: Report of the Society of neurointerventional surgery standards and guidelines committee. J Neurointerv Surg. 11:1055–1062. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gory B, Mazighi M, Labreuche J, Blanc R, Piotin M, Turjman F and Lapergue B: ETIS (Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke) Investigators. Predictors for mortality after mechanical thrombectomy of acute basilar artery occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis. 45:61–67. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Miteff F, Faulder KC, Goh AC, Steinfort BS, Sue C and Harrington TJ: Mechanical thrombectomy with a self-expanding retrievable intracranial stent (Solitaire AB): Experience in 26 patients with acute cerebral artery occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 32:1078–1081. 2011.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gao F, Lo WT, Sun X, Mo DP, Ma N and Miao ZR: Combined use of mechanical thrombectomy with angioplasty and stenting for acute basilar occlusions with underlying severe intracranial vertebrobasilar stenosis: Preliminary experience from a single chinese center. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 36:1947–1952. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Huo X, Gao F, Sun X, Ma N, Song L, Mo D, Liu L, Wang B, Zhang X and Miao Z: Endovascular mechanical thrombectomy with the solitaire device for the treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion. World Neurosurg. 89:301–308. 2016.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Andersson T, Kuntze Söderqvist Å, Söderman M, Holmin S, Wahlgren N and Kaijser M: Mechanical thrombectomy as the primary treatment for acute basilar artery occlusion: Experience from 5 years of practice. J Neurointerv Surg. 5:221–225. 2013.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Lee HN, Kim BT, Im SB, Hwang SC, Jeong JH, Chung MY, Park JH and Shin DS: Implications of mechanical endovascular thrombectomy for acute basilar and posterior cerebral artery occlusion. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 20:168–175. 2018.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kaneko J, Ota T, Tagami T, Unemoto K, Shigeta K, Amano T, Ueda M, Matsumaru Y, Shiokawa Y and Hirano T: TREAT Study Group. Endovascular treatment of acute basilar artery occlusion: Tama-REgistry of acute thrombectomy (TREAT) study. J Neurol Sci. 401:29–33. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Munich SA, Vakharia K and Levy EI: Overview of mechanical thrombectomy techniques. Neurosurgery. 85 (Suppl 1):S60–S67. 2019.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar | |
Molina CA, Chamorro A, Rovira À, de Miquel A, Serena J, Roman LS, Jovin TG, Davalos A and Cobo E: REVASCAT: A randomized trial of revascularization with SOLITAIRE FR device vs best medical therapy in the treatment of acute stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion presenting within eight-hours of symptom onset. Int J Stroke. 10:619–626. 2015.PubMed/NCBI View Article : Google Scholar |