URD12: A urea derivative with marked antitumor activities

  • Authors:
    • Ai-Yun Wang
    • Yin Lu
    • Hai-Liang Zhu
    • Qing-Cai Jiao
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 8, 2011     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2011.474
  • Pages: 373-376
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Urea derivatives have been widely used in biology and medicine. The substituted urea derivative URD12 introduced in this study exhibits cytotoxic activity against the K562 human leukemia and KB human mouth epidermal carcinoma cell lines. To further study the bioactivity of URD12 and examine its feasibility as a new antitumor drug, we applied in vivo and in vitro assays to investigate the antitumor activity of URD12. URD12 was prepared and its cytotoxicity was evaluated using the BGC-823 human gastric carcinoma, MGC-803 human gastric carcinoma, SMMC-7721 human hepatoma and HepG2 human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines using MTT assays. Antitumor activity in vivo was confirmed in mice bearing H22 hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Organ coefficient was used to further elucidate the cytotoxic mechanisms of URD12. URD12 inhibited the growth of tested tumor cell lines in vitro and the growth of H22 mouse hepatocellular carcinoma in vivo with no effects on the weight, spleen and thymus coefficient of tumor-bearing mice. In conclusion, our findings indicate that URD12 is an effective antitumor agent without evident immunosuppression effects.

Introduction

Urea is a well-known, widely occurring natural product. Its derivatives have been studied for their biological activities including anti-atherosclerotic, antibiotic (1) and hypoglycemic effects (2) and antitumor activities (312).

We have extensively studied urea and its derivatives. Among a series of substituted urea derivatives that we have synthesized, URD12 (Fig. 1) exhibits marked antitumor activity. With a morpholine ring, URD12 exhibits significant cytotoxic activity against the K562 human leukemia and KB human mouth epidermal carcinoma cell lines (13). To further investigate the bioactivity of URD12, we designed in vivo and in vitro experiments to examine its antitumor activity.

Materials and methods

Animals and cell lines

Male ICR mice (6 weeks old, 20±2 g) were obtained from the Experimental Animal Center of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine. The animals were kept in groups of 6 per cage in a temperature-controlled room at 20±2°C. The mice were fed with a standard pellet diet and given free access to tap water. All studies involving mice (including tumor cell inoculation and tumor weighing) were approved by the Institute’s Animal Care and Use Committee.

The BGC-823 human gastric carcinoma, SMMC-7721 human hepatoma carcinoma, HepG2 human hepatocellular carcinoma and H22 mouse hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines were obtained from Professor Lu’s laboratory (Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine) and cultured in RPMI-1640 with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml streptomycin and penicillin.

Preparation of URD12

Anhydrous DMF (40 mmol) and SOCl2 (0.10 mol) were added to anhydrous CH2Cl2 (15 ml) and the resultant solution was stirred at reflux (approximately 70°C) for 4 h. After cooling down, the excess SOCl2 was evaporated under reduced pressure and the residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (15 ml) and anhydrous pyridine (4 ml). A solution of N-2-aminoethylmorphorine (40 mmol) in anhydrous CH2Cl2 was then added and the mixture was stirred at 50–60°C for 5 h before being poured into ice-water (20 ml). The layers were separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with AcOEt (2×10 ml). The combined organic layer was washed with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution, dried over Na2SO4 for half an hour and concentrated under vacuum. The residue was purified by column chromatography (SiO2; AcOEt/petroleum ether 1:2–2:1). The purified product URD12, obtained in 53% yield, was identified by NMR, MS and elemental analysis.

MTT cell proliferation assay

The MTT assay was performed to determine the cytotoxicity based on the previously described method with minor modifications (14). In brief, 200 μl of H22 cell suspension (1×104 cells) were added to 96-well round-bottomed plates (Corning Incorporated Costar®3799, Corning, NY, USA) and each plate was incubated for 24 h at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. Following incubation, 20 μl per well of complete medium for controls or reagent with different concentrations for experimental groups were distributed in the 96-well plates and each plate was incubated for 48 h at 37°C in a humidified environment with 5% CO2. Following incubation, 20 μl of 5 mg/ml MTT solution (dissolved in PBS and sterilized by filtration) were added to each well and the cultures were incubated in the dark for 4 h at 37°C in a humidified environment with 5% CO2. The culture medium was removed from the wells and replaced with 150 μl of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Following agitation for 10 min, the absorbance of each well was measured at 490 nm using a Spectra Max 190 plate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The cell inhibition rate was calculated using the formula: cell inhibition rate = (1-(absorbance of experimental wells)/(absorbance of control wells) ×100%. The assays were performed at least three times in quadruplicates to determine the IC50 value. The IC50 value was calculated from the indicated concentrations using the method described by Bliss (15).

Effect of URD12 on solid tumor growth inhibition (16–17)

Animals were divided into 5 groups (n=12 per group). Under sterile conditions, the animals were injected subcutaneously in the right forelimb with 1×106 H22 hepatocellular carcinoma cells in sterile physiological saline (aspirated from 7-day-old H22 ascites tumors in mice) at 0.2 ml/mouse. After 24 h of tumor inoculation, URD12 (25, 50 or 100 mg/kg) was dissolved in 5% DMSO and administered intraperitoneally for 10 days in mice transplanted with H22 tumor cells. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) (25 mg/kg) was used as a positive control. The negative control was injected with 5% DMSO. On the 11th day, blood samples were drawn from orbit to separate serum. The samples were maintained at −80°C in preparation for the tests for TNF-α and IL-2 (R&D ELISA Kit, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN USA). The animals were then sacrificed. Tumors, thymus and spleen were extirpated and weighed. The inhibition ratio (%) was calculated using the formula: inhibition ratio (%) = (C-T)/C ×100%, where ‘T’ and ‘C’ are the average tumor weights of the treated and control groups, respectively. Organ coefficient = organ weight/body weight ×100%.

Statistical analysis

Results were expressed as the mean ± SE. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t-test. Differences were considered significant if P<0.05.

Results

Inhibition of cell proliferation by URD12 treatment

It was found that URD12 was an effective anti-proliferative agent. Exposure to URD12 for 48 h inhibited tumor cell growth in all four lines tested (Fig. 2).

Proliferation/survival was assessed using the MTT assay. MTT is a pale yellow substrate that can be cleaved by living cells to yield a dark blue formazan product. This colorimetric change reflects the proliferation/survival of viable cells. IC50 concentrations varied from approximately 0.456 mmol/l for SMMC-7721 to 1.437 mmol/l for MGC-803.

In vivo antitumor activity

URD12 significantly suppressed growth of the H22 tumor, and URD12 was more effective at 100 mg/kg than at lower doses. Significant differences were observed between the treatment and control groups (Fig. 3A).

In addition, a marked decrease in body weight was observed in the 5-FU-treated group compared with the control group, whereas no decrease was observed in the URD12-treated groups (Table I). This finding indicates that URD12 may be a promising antitumor agent with low toxicity.

Table I

Inhibitive effects of URD12 treatment on tumors.

Table I

Inhibitive effects of URD12 treatment on tumors.

GroupsNo. of animalsDose (mg/kg)Body weight (g)Tumor weight (g)Tumor weight inhibition (%)


BeginningEndBeginningEnd
Vehicle1212-21.6±0.422.3±1.11.164±0.138-
5-FU1262521.0±0.415.7±0.4a0.265±0.033a77.25
URD1212102520.7±0.621.9±1.30.837±0.12628.10
12115021.3±0.721.6±1.00.694±0.107a40.37
121210021.3±0.523.3±0.90.651±0.047a44.10

{ label (or @symbol) needed for fn[@id='tfn1-ol-03-02-0373'] } Data are shown as the mean ± SE of n animals.

a P<0.05 compared with control group. 5-FU, fluorouracil.

To evaluate the possible toxicological effects of URD12 on mouse organs, we extirpated the spleen and thymus and weighed them after the mice had been sacrificed. The organs were then analyzed for gross anatomy. No significant changes in organ weight were observed in animals treated with URD12, whereas 5-FU treatment reduced the body weight and spleen and thymus coefficients compared with the control group (Fig. 3B). The serum levels of TNF-α and IL-2 in the 5-FU group were low, and URD12 treatment groups exhibited no marked change (Fig. 3C and D).

Since Mosmann used a tetrazolium salt to develop a quantitative colorimetric assay for detecting mammalian cell survival and proliferation, this method has been used widely (18). The main advantages of the colorimetric assay are its rapidity, precision and lack of any radioisotope. We used the MTT assay to detect the activity of URD12 on tumor cells. Our results revealed that URD12 inhibited the growth of the four tumor cell lines investigated.

Discussion

Studies have shown that when the body generates a certain volume of tumor cells, anti-tumor immune response develops. As a result, cancer patients experience more favorable outcomes in the early or catabatic stage of tumor progression, and following surgery. However, when the tumor progresses to a certain extent, the majority of patients undergo immune inhibition due to a variety of immune substances secreted by the tumor, and tumor patients suffer from collapse of immune systems including abnormal growth of spleen and shrinking of thymus. With the development of immunology and molecular biology, it has generally been accepted that the immunity of the body is closely correlated to the generation and development of cancer, and that dysfunction of the immune system is a crucial factor leading to cancer. When tumor cells invade the body, the immune system responds to the outside antigens. However, with the growth of the tumor, immune functions of the body are inhibited by the tumor in a variety of ways. The compensative outward-transfer of mature and nearly mature lymphocytes in the thymus and certain active factors generated in the tumor lead to the shrinking of the thymus. In addition, the inhibitory substances released by the tumor and the tumor-distinctive inhibitors produced by induction of the body result in an abnormal increase of the spleen index in tumor-bearing mice.

H22 cells are mouse hepatocarcinoma cells and are generally used for tumor research and drug screening (19). The immune organ coefficient is an index with which to initially judge the body’s immune function. The thymus and spleen are essential immune organs. The main function of the thymus is to generate lymphocytes and to secrete thymosin, which is mainly associated with cell immunity. B lymphocytes play a more significant role in the spleen in that they are closely correlated to body fluid immunity. The above-mentioned experiments revealed that the spleen index increased abnormally and the thymus shrank in tumor-bearing mice. Since the antitumor effect of URD12 was more marked on hepatoma than on gastric carcinoma, an antitumor evaluation in vivo was carried out. The results showed that when treated with URD12, mouse immune organs were not inhibited, and their body weight did not markedly decrease. Compared with 5-FU, the antitumor activity of URD12 was weak, but it had substantially less toxicity.

A major complication of chemotherapy is toxicity to normal cells, which is due to the lack of specificity of drug actions between normal and malignant cells. This event often impacts the efficacy of the treatment and even leads to treatment failure in certain patients. One of the requirements of cancer chemopreventive agents is effective clearance of damaged or malignant cells through cell cycle inhibition or induction of apoptosis without, or with less, toxicity to normal cells (2021). Our data indicate that URD12, a urea derivative bearing a morpholine moiety for enhanced bioactivity, exhibits marked antitumor activity without obvious immune inhibition.

References

1 

Hackbarth CJ, Chen DZ, Lewis JG, et al: N-alkyl urea hydroxamic acids as a new class of peptide deformylase inhibitors with antibacterial activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 46:2752–2764. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Yang J, Di F, He R, et al: Efffect of addition of low-dose rosiglitazone to sulphonylurea therapy on glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients. Chin Med J (Engl). 116:785–787. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

3 

Cook JW, Sterman DH, Singhal S, Smythe WR and Kaiser LR: Suramin inhibits the growth of malignant mesothelioma in vitro, and in vivo, in murine flank and intraperitoneal models. Lung Cancer. 42:263–274. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

4 

Easmon J, Purstinger G, Heinisch G, et al: Synthesis, cytotoxicity, and antitumor activity of copper(II) and iron(II) complexes of (4)N-azabicyclo[3.2.2]nonane thiosemicarbazones derived from acyl diazines. J Med Chem. 44:2164–2171. 2001.PubMed/NCBI

5 

Fujita F, Fujita M, Inaba H, Sugimoto T, Okuyama Y and Taguchi T: Combination chemotherapy of HO-221, a derivative of benzoylphenylurea with various anticancer agents against human cancer xenografts in nude mice. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 18:2263–2270. 1991.PubMed/NCBI

6 

Gnewuch CT and Sosnovsky G: A critical appraisal of the evolution of N-nitrosoureas as anticancer drugs. Chem Rev. 97:829–1014. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

7 

Jiang JD, Denner L, Ling YH, et al: Double blockade of cell cycle at g(1)-s transition and m phase by 3-iodoacetamido benzoyl ethyl ester, a new type of tubulin ligand. Cancer Res. 62:6080–6088. 2002.PubMed/NCBI

8 

Jiang JD, Roboz J, Weisz I, et al: Synthesis, cancericidal and antimicrotubule activities of 3-(haloacetamido)-benzoylureas. Anticancer Drug Des. 13:735–747. 1998.PubMed/NCBI

9 

Okada H, Koyanagi T and Yamada N: Synthesis and antitumor activities of prodrugs of benzoylphenylureas. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 42:57–61. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

10 

Olaharski AJ, Mondrala ST and Eastmond DA: Chromosomal malsegregation and micronucleus induction in vitro by the DNA topoisomerase II inhibitor fisetin. Mutat Res. 582:79–86. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Singh SK, Ruchelman AL, Li TK, Liu A, Liu LF and LaVoie EJ: Nitro and amino substitution in the D-ring of 5-(2-dimethyl-aminoethyl)-2,3-methylenedioxy-5H-dibenzo[c,h][1,6]naph-thyridin-6-ones: effect on topoisomerase-I targeting activity and cytotoxicity. J Med Chem. 46:2254–2257. 2003.PubMed/NCBI

12 

Toth JE, Grindey GB, Ehlhardt WJ, et al: Sulfonimidamide analogs of oncolytic sulfonylureas. J Med Chem. 40:1018–1025. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Cao P, Huang XF, Ding H, et al: Synthesis and cytotoxic evaluation of substituted urea derivatives as inhibitors of human-leukemia K562 cells. Chem Biodivers. 4:881–886. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

14 

Si-Tu ZQ and Wu JZ: Cell Culture. 2nd edition. World Publishing Corporation; Xi’an: pp. 200–201. 2007

15 

Bliss C: The comparison of dosage-mortality data. Ann Appl Biol. 22:307–333. 1935. View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Tian Z, Si J, Chang Q, et al: Antitumor activity and mechanisms of action of total glycosides from aerial part of Cimicifuga dahurica targeted against hepatoma. BMC Cancer. 7:2372007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Long L and Li Q: The effect of alkaloid from Oxytropis ochrocephala on growth inhibition and expression of PCNA and p53 in mice bearing H22 hepatocellular carcinoma. Yakugaku Zasshi. 125:665–670. 2005.PubMed/NCBI

18 

Mosmann T: Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 65:55–63. 1983. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Hirohashi S, Shimosato Y, Kameya T, et al: Production of alpha-fetoprotein and normal serum proteins by xenotransplanted human hepatomas in relation to their growth and morphology. Cancer Res. 39:1819–1828. 1979.PubMed/NCBI

20 

Srivastava JK and Gupta S: Tocotrienol-rich fraction of palm oil induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis selectively in human prostate cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 346:447–453. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Stolarska M, Mlynarski W, Zalewska-Szewczyk B and Bodalski J: Cytoprotective effect of amifostine in the treatment of childhood neoplastic diseases – a clinical study including the pharmacoeconomic analysis. Pharmacol Rep. 58:30–34. 2006.PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

February 2012
Volume 3 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Wang A, Lu Y, Zhu H and Jiao Q: URD12: A urea derivative with marked antitumor activities. Oncol Lett 3: 373-376, 2012.
APA
Wang, A., Lu, Y., Zhu, H., & Jiao, Q. (2012). URD12: A urea derivative with marked antitumor activities. Oncology Letters, 3, 373-376. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2011.474
MLA
Wang, A., Lu, Y., Zhu, H., Jiao, Q."URD12: A urea derivative with marked antitumor activities". Oncology Letters 3.2 (2012): 373-376.
Chicago
Wang, A., Lu, Y., Zhu, H., Jiao, Q."URD12: A urea derivative with marked antitumor activities". Oncology Letters 3, no. 2 (2012): 373-376. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2011.474