The prognostic impact of extracapsular lymph node involvement in rectal cancer patients: Implications for staging and adjuvant treatment strategies

  • Authors:
    • J. Brabender
    • E. Bollschweiler
    • A. H. Hölscher
    • K. Strobel
    • C. Gutschow
    • K. Prenzel
    • P. Grimminger
    • U. Drebber
    • W. Schröder
    • R. Metzger
    • D. Vallböhmer
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: January 16, 2012     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2012.569
  • Pages: 825-830
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

Limited data suggest that extracapsular lymph node involvement (LNI) has a negative prognostic impact in gastrointestinal malignancies. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and prognostic impact of LNI in patients with primary resected rectal cancer. Between 1997 and 2007, 243 rectal cancer patients underwent surgical therapy without neoadjuvant treatment at our Department. Of these, 12 (5%) patients received transanal endoscopic microsurgery and were not included for further analyses. In the remaining patients, a (low) anterior resection was performed in 79% and an abdominoperineal rectal amputation in 21%. The total number of analyzed lymph nodes and the number of metastatic lymph nodes with/without extracapsular LNI were determined and the prognostic impact of LNI was assessed. The median number of analyzed lymph nodes was 14. In total, 59% of patients were node-negative, 18% of patients were node‑positive without extracapsular LNI and 23% of patients were node-positive with extracapsular LNI. A positive lymph node status with extracapsular LNI was significantly correlated with a poorer T-, N- and M-category, grading and more frequent lymphatic vessel infiltration compared with node-negative or node-positive without extracapsular LNI patients (p<0.001). The overall 5-year survival rate of node-negative patients was 75%, for node-positive without extracapsular LNI patients 69% and for node-positive with extracapsular LNI patients 36% (p<0.001). By multivariate analysis, the N-category with extracapsular LNI was characterized as an independent prognostic factor. Extracapsular lymph node involvement reveals an independent negative prognostic impact in patients with rectal cancer undergoing surgical therapy. Staging systems for rectal cancer should include the implementation of extracapsular lymph node involvement.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

April 2012
Volume 3 Issue 4

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Brabender J, Bollschweiler E, Hölscher AH, Strobel K, Gutschow C, Prenzel K, Grimminger P, Drebber U, Schröder W, Metzger R, Metzger R, et al: The prognostic impact of extracapsular lymph node involvement in rectal cancer patients: Implications for staging and adjuvant treatment strategies. Oncol Lett 3: 825-830, 2012.
APA
Brabender, J., Bollschweiler, E., Hölscher, A.H., Strobel, K., Gutschow, C., Prenzel, K. ... Vallböhmer, D. (2012). The prognostic impact of extracapsular lymph node involvement in rectal cancer patients: Implications for staging and adjuvant treatment strategies. Oncology Letters, 3, 825-830. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2012.569
MLA
Brabender, J., Bollschweiler, E., Hölscher, A. H., Strobel, K., Gutschow, C., Prenzel, K., Grimminger, P., Drebber, U., Schröder, W., Metzger, R., Vallböhmer, D."The prognostic impact of extracapsular lymph node involvement in rectal cancer patients: Implications for staging and adjuvant treatment strategies". Oncology Letters 3.4 (2012): 825-830.
Chicago
Brabender, J., Bollschweiler, E., Hölscher, A. H., Strobel, K., Gutschow, C., Prenzel, K., Grimminger, P., Drebber, U., Schröder, W., Metzger, R., Vallböhmer, D."The prognostic impact of extracapsular lymph node involvement in rectal cancer patients: Implications for staging and adjuvant treatment strategies". Oncology Letters 3, no. 4 (2012): 825-830. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2012.569