The role of AIB1 in breast cancer (Review)
- Authors:
- Published online on: July 16, 2012 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2012.803
- Pages: 588-594
Abstract
Contents
Introduction
Overview of AIB1 structure and function
Implication of AIB1 in breast cancer
Conclusion
Introduction
Amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1), also known as steroid receptor coactivator-3 (SRC-3), nuclear receptor coactivator-3 (NCoA-3), receptor associated coactivator-3 (RAC-3), activator of thyroid hormone and retinoid receptor (ACTR), thyroid hormone receptor activating molecule-1 (TRAM-1) and p300/CBP interacting protein (p/CIP) is a member of the p160 nuclear receptor coactivator family (1). Other members of this family include SRC-1 and SRC-2. The AIB1 gene is located on chromosome 20q12-12, and it was first identified in human breast cancer cells, where approximately 10% of these cells revealed amplification of the gene and 64% revealed overexpression of the protein (2). AIB1 was later considered as an oncogene since overexpression of AIB1 in mice led to the spontaneous development of malignant mammary tumors (3), whereas AIB1−/− mice were resistant to chemical carcinogen-induced mammary tumorigenesis (4,5). However, AIB1 also acts as a tumor suppressor since deletion of the AIB1 gene in B-cell lymphoma mice led to the development of B-cell lymphomas (6). Furthermore, results from cell culture systems and targeted gene disruption experiments in mice have demonstrated that AIB1 also plays an essential role in the female reproductive function, puberty, cytokine signaling and vasoprotection (7). The correlation between AIB1 and cancer has been widely investigated since it was shown to be amplified in breast cancer. Initially, AIB1 was thought to promote cancer development through hormone-dependent pathways since it acts as a transcriptional coactivator for nuclear receptors in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. However, various non-nuclear receptor transcription factors, such as E2F1, p53 and NF-κB were found to be coactivated by AIB1, which provides supporting evidence that AIB1 also influences the progress of cancer cells through hormone-independent pathways (8–10). Over the past decade, numerous reviews focusing on the function of AIB1 and its role in cancer have been published (11–19). The focus of this review is to highlight the important progress made with recent findings and to present an overview of the current understanding of the signaling pathways through which the influence of AIB1 leads to the development and progression of breast cancer.
Overview of AIB1 structure and function
Structural domains of AIB1 and its functions
AIB1 is approximately 160 kDa in size and its structure is conserved across different species. The structure of AIB1 consists of a central nuclear receptor interaction domain (NID), an N-terminal basic helix-loop-helix/Per-ARNT-Sim (bHLH/PAS) domain and two activation domains, known as AD1 and AD2, located in the C-terminal region (Fig. 1). In addition, it also contains a serine/threonine-rich domain in the N-terminus, a glutamine (Q)-rich domain, and a histone acetyltransferase (HAT) domain in the C-terminus. The relatively conserved NID domain mainly mediates direct interaction between AIB1 and nuclear receptors, such as ER and androgen receptor (AR) through ligand-dependent pathways. Analysis of the NID sequence has revealed three conserved LXXLL motifs (where L is leucine and X is any amino acid) that act as a nuclear receptor box (20). These three LXXLL motifs form an amphipathic α-helix in the secondary structure, which then allows the conserved leucines to form a hydrophobic surface that mediates the binding of ligands to the ligand-binding domain of nuclear receptors (13).
The bHLH/PAS domain of AIB1 is conserved in the SRC family with a sequence similarity of approximately 60%. This domain mediates protein-protein interactions that result in the recruitment of other coactivators. The AD1 domain, also named CBP-interaction domain (CID), is involved in direct interaction with the general transcriptional cointegrators, CBP/p300 and PCAF, without interacting with nuclear receptors (21). The AD1 domain also contains three LXXLL/LXXLL-like motifs, which are crucial in promoting the interaction between AIB1 and p300 (22,23). The AD2 domain is mainly responsible for the interaction with histone methyltransferases, including coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase-1 (CARM1) and protein arginine methyltransferase-1 (PRMT1) (24–26). The HAT activity of the C-terminal domain of AIB1 is weaker than that of CBP/p300 and PCAF, and its importance in AIB1 transcriptional activation has yet to be clarified (27–29). The structure and function of AIB1 has previously been extensively reviewed (11,17).
Importance of post-translational modification
Certain serines and threonines in the serine/threonine-rich domain are also sites of phosphorylation. In vitro phosphorylation of AIB1 converts it into a potent transcriptional activator, thereby modifying its oncogenic potential and leading to differential gene expression (30). Phosphorylation of tyrosine residue (Y1357) in the AD2 domain by AbI kinase is required for its activity in cancer cells (31). Dephosphorylation of AIB1 by phosphatases has been shown to be critical for regulating its function and preventing its proteasome-dependent turnover (32), and phosphorylation by atypical protein kinase C (aPKC), which is frequently overexpressed in cancers, specifically stabilizes AIB1 in an ER-dependent manner through coordinating the inhibition of both ubiquitin-dependent and ubiquitin-independent degradations (33). The turnover of activated AIB1 during tumorigenesis has recently been shown to be mediated by speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP), which is a cullin 3-based ubiquitin ligase (34). A high percentage of loss of heterozyogisty at the SPOP locus was found in breast cancers, and restoration of its expression resulted in the suppression of AIB1-mediated oncogenic signaling and tumorigenesis.
Our previous study demonstrated that phosphorylation of AIB1 is accompanied by a loss in sumoylation and an increase in its transactivation, while dephosphorylation is accompanied by a concomitant increase in sumoylation and reduced transactivation (35). We have recently reported that sumoylation of AIB1 requires the SUMO E3 PIAS1, which coprecipitated with AIB1 in extract prepared from MCF-7 cells, and that overexpression of PIAS1 and AIB1 in MCF-7 cells led to increased sumoylation of AIB1, resulting in repression of its transcriptional activity (36). PIAS1 also increased the stability of AIB1 and attenuated its interaction with ERα. These findings suggest that PIAS1 may play a crucial role in the regulation of AIB1 transcriptional activity and its interaction with accessory proteins through sumoylation.
As an ER coactivator, AIB1 regulates ER transcriptional activity through recruitment of the histone acetyltransferases CBP/p300 and PCAF. Acetylation of histones could modify chromatin structure and facilitate ER to bind at the promoters of downstream target genes, leading to enhanced expression of cancer genes. Through sequencing and mapping of genomic DNA fragments obtained by AIB1 ChIP assays, Labhart et al (37) identified 18 putative AIB1 target genes based on their strong AIB1-binding sites, and demonstrated ERα binding with all of these genes. AIB1 also promotes certain transcription factors to interact with other transcription cofactors and this process is regulated by post-translational modifications, including methylation, sumoylation, phosphorylation and acetylation (38). The transcriptional complex of AIB1 in hormone-induced gene expression mediated by the nuclear receptor is shown in Fig. 2.
Implication of AIB1 in breast cancer
AIB1 and hormone-dependent breast cancer
The AIB1 gene is amplified in approximately 5–10% of human breast cancers and is overexpressed at both the mRNA (as high as 60%) and protein levels in approximately 30% of breast cancers (2,39–43). Further study has revealed that overexpression of AIB1 is correlated with tumor recurrence and survival (44). Increases in AIB1 transcript levels in human breast tumors may also occur by mechanisms other than gene amplification, such as overexpression of AIB1 mRNA resulting from a loss of ER expression in breast tumor samples (45). A recent study investigating the prognostic significance of AIB1 and its correlation with various steroid hormone receptors (ER, PR, AR, DAX-1 and HER2) shows that for patients suffering from ER-negative breast cancers, strong AIB1 protein expression is correlated with poorer overall survival (46). Besides breast cancer, amplification of AIB1 has also been detected in many other hormone-sensitive tumors, including prostate and ovarian cancers (2,47).
As a member of the steroid receptor coactivator family, AIB1 is essential for the transcriptional activity of certain nuclear receptors (including ERα), which control processes important for development, homeostasis and reproduction (48). AIB1 is considered to play significant roles in ER-positive breast cancers. The level of ER in breast cancer is considered to be an important marker for most breast cancer therapy and prognosis. As a coactivator for ER, AIB1 is thought to influence the growth of hormone-dependent breast cancer through mediating the effects of estrogen on ERα-dependent gene expression (2,41), and this serves as a mechanism by which AIB1 modulates the growth of hormone-dependent breast cancer. This mechanistic model is supported by a study showing that depletion of AIB1 may inhibit estrogen-stimulated cell proliferation and survival in ER-positive MCF-7 human breast cancer cells, leading to a decrease in growth of MCF-7 xenografts in mice (49,50). However, not all ERα-positive breast cancers are associated with higher levels of AIB1 mRNA, as ERα-negative breast cancer has also been found to be associated with high levels of AIB1 mRNA (14). Discrepancy among these studies is thought to be caused by differences in the role and regulation of AIB1 and the hormone receptors at different stages of breast cancer. A recent study has uncovered evidence of an association between silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptor (SMRT) with AIB1 in the regulation of ER-dependent gene expression, such as the expression of progesterone receptor and cyclin D1 genes (51). SMRT is able to bind directly to AIB1 independently of ER, and this complex then promotes the subsequent E2-dependent binding of AIB1 to ER, demonstrating that SMRT promotes ER- and AIB1-dependent gene expression in breast cancer.
The correlation between AIB1 and breast cancer has also been investigated using several AIB1-depleted mouse models. In mice harbouring the mouse mammary tumor virus/v-Ha-ras (ras) transgene, breast tumor incidence was notably reduced in intact AIB1−/− -ras virgin mice compared to complete inhibition in ovariectomized AIB1−/− -ras mice (4). Furthermore, the level of IGF-1 expression and insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 and -2 proteins in the mammary glands and tumors of these mice were significantly reduced, which contributed in part to the suppression of mammary tumorigenesis and metastasis. In another model, mice lacking AIB1 were shown to be resistant to chemical carcinogen-induced mammary tumorigenesis (5). In a different mouse model, deletion of one allele of AIB1 in MMTV-Neu mice was found to significantly delay Neu-induced mammary tumor development, demonstrating that AIB1 is required for Neu (ErbB2/HER2) activation, signaling and mammary tumorigenesis (52). Although these animal models have provided important data on the involvement of AIB1 in breast cancer by allowing the disease to be simulated or recreated under controlled conditions, they still do not represent the real condition of the disease in the case of humans, and at best, should only be regarded as a mimic. Thus, what have been learned from animal models may not necessarily be completely applicable to humans.
AIB1 also appears to play a significant role in the resistance of breast cancer to anti-estrogen therapy. Over the past few decades, tamoxifen has been the standard endocrine therapy for treating ER-positive breast cancer. Tamoxifen is a non-steroidal estrogen receptor antagonist (but also exhibits agonist activity) and functions by competitively blocking the binding of estrogen to ER, thereby inhibiting estrogen-mediated gene expression and estrogen-dependent cell growth (53). However, the use of tamoxifen has gradually led to the emergence of tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. The involvement of AIB1 in tamoxifen resistance has been demonstrated in breast cancer patients, whereby disease-free and overall survival is correlated with high expression of AIB1. There is also evidence linking the expression of AIB1 protein and breast tumor recurrence in ErbB2-positive breast tumors, and knockdown of AIB1 in tamoxifen-resistant, ErbB2-positive breast cancer cell line BT474 restored its sensitivity to tamoxifen (54). These results appear to indicate that the expression of AIB1 is associated with resistance to tamoxifen for ER-positive breast cancer patients undergoing tamoxifen treatment. The underlying mechanism for tamoxifen resistance has been further clarified by data obtained from an in vivo breast tumor model, which showed that tamoxifen resistance in ER-positive breast cancer is also mediated by EGFR/HER2, even though ER genomic function is suppressed by tamoxifen (55). In a recent study, Karmakar et al (56) evaluated the role of AIB1 and two other SRC coactivators in the growth of the estrogen-independent and tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cell line LCC2 and found that these coactivators exert a mixture of ligand-dependent and ligand-independent effects on the regulation of cell growth and apoptosis. Furthermore, these authors demonstrated that growth of LCC2 cells is controlled by AIB1 and SCR-2, largely through the control of basal cell growth, and suggested that targeting growth inhibition via SRC-2 and AIB1 may offer a more effective way to inhibit the growth of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer. Resistance to tamoxifen is now being viewed as a result of crosstalk between ER and growth factor signaling pathways (57,58). AIB1 is considered to play a positive role in tamoxifen resistance since overexpression of AIB1 alone has been shown to increase the agonist properties of tamoxifen in breast cancer cell lines (59). Taken together, these existing findings support the notion that tamoxifen resistance is a product of multiple mechanisms, and that AIB1 appears to play an important role; however, further investigation is required to provide a more definitive understanding of its underlying mechanism.
A more recent study concerned with the global characterization of the transcriptional impact of AIB1 has shed more light on the scope of AIB1 target genes and provides a molecular framework for AIB1 in interpreting estrogen signaling (60). This study, which combines genome-wide mapping of AIB1 affinity sites in MCF-7 cells with RNA expression signatures and a proteomic approach, is so far the most sophisticated study to identify the transcriptional regulatory network of AIB1. It also opens up new areas for exploring the hormone-dependent signaling of breast cancer afforded by AIB1.
AIB1 and hormone-independent breast cancer
Although AIB1 levels have been shown to be a limiting factor for ER-positive breast cancer growth through hormone-dependent pathways, substantial evidence has suggested that AIB1 stimulates the growth of cancer cells through hormone-independent pathways. For example, in a recent study, Torres-Arzayus et al (61) addressed the role of estrogen and ERα in AIB1-mediated tumor formation and showed that AIB1 transgenic mice that had their ovaries removed at the prepubertal stage to block estrogen production did not develop any invasive mammary gland tumors. However, these animals showed higher incidence of pituitary, lung, skin and bone tumors than their non-ovariectomized counterparts. They also crossed AIB1 transgenic mice with ERα-null mutant mice and found that mice lacking ERα were unable to respond to estrogen through this receptor. At the same time, these animals showed no signs of mammary tumors but developed tumors in the lung, skin, and pituitary gland with the same incidence as their ERα-positive AIB1 transgenic counterparts. The authors concluded from these findings that depending on the organ or tissue affected, AIB1 causes tumor formation by estrogen-dependent and estrogen-independent mechanisms, and that AIB1 exerts its oncogenic activities in cell signaling that are independent of its function as an ER coactivator. Other studies have also indicated the involvement of AIB1 in breast cancer through certain hormone-independent pathways, including E2F1, IGF-I and EGF signaling (Fig. 3) (7,62).
Overexpression of AIB1 has been found to increase cell proliferation even in the presence of nuclear receptor antagonist (9). More convincingly, the overexpression of AIB1 promotes the growth of hormone-independent cancer cells through enhancing the transcription of E2F target genes, which are mostly G1/S cycle transition-related proteins, such as E2F1, cyclin E and cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (Cdk2) (9). AIB1 interacts with the transcriptional factor E2F1, and this then results in the recruitment of AIB1 to the E2F-binding sites on the target gene promoters, eventually leading to activation of these E2F-dependent downstream genes. Notably, AIB1 promotes its own transcription with E2F1, and this positive feedback regulatory loop is thought to enhance the influence AIB1 exerts on cell cycle control. Overexpression of AIB1 has also been found to correlate with high levels of p53 proteins in invasive breast cancer cells (45).
The association of AIB1 with the regulation of IGF-I signaling in cancer is supported by the finding that AIB1 knockout downregulates the expression levels of both IGF-I mRNA and protein, whereas overexpression of AIB1 has the opposite effect (63). In addition, AIB1 may also regulate the expression of many IGF-I signaling components, including IGF-I receptor β (IGF-IRβ), IRS-1 and IRS-2 in vitro and in vivo. Although the mechanism as to how AIB1 modulates IGF-I signaling in cancers is not clear, it has been reported that AIB1 binds to the transcription factor AP-1 and promotes AP-1-mediated transcription of IGF-I and IRS-1 (64). In addition, AIB1 knockout mice have an impaired ability in their response to IGF-I stimulation and are unresponsive to IGF-I-induced DNA synthesis. This may in part be explained by the result from the study conducted by Liao et al (65), which shows that AIB1−/− mice have lower levels of circulating IGF-I compared to wild-type mice, a consequence of rapid IGF-I degradation rather than lower expression. The rapid IGF-I degradation is caused by a lack of expression of IGF-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), which is induced by vitamin D through a vitamin D receptor (VDR). These results point to a role of AIB1 in maintaining the circulating level of IGF-I through increasing VDR-regulated IGFBP-3 expression. The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is also associated with AIB1-mediated tumorigenesis, since it was shown that mammary hyperplasia and hypertrophy induced in mice via overexpression of AIB1 can be prevented by inhibition of mTOR with the rapamycin analog RAD001 (66). RAD001 also inhibits the growth of AIB1-induced tumor xenografts in mice.
EGF signaling is known to play a crucial role in the initiation and progression of breast cancer (67). The influence of AIB1 on breast cancer via EGF signaling is supported by a study showing that AIB1 knockdown by siRNA reduced EGF-mediated phosphorylation of EGFR and HER-2, leading to inhibition of the activation of EGF signaling in lung, pancreatic and breast cancer cells and confirming that AIB1 regulates EGF signaling to promote the proliferation of cancer cells (68). Taken together, these studies indicate that the role of AIB1 extends beyond the actions of steroid hormone receptors in cancer cells.
The role of AIB1 in cancer progression and metastasis
AIB1 plays a significant role in mammary tumor progression and metastasis through mediating tumor cell motility and invasion (18,43,69). AIB1−/− mice harboring the mouse mammary tumor virus-polomavirus middle T (PyMT) transgene or AIB1−/−/PyMT human tumor cells were found to have reduced expression of MMP2 and MMP9, resulting in lower cell-invasive and metastatic capabilities (43). AIB1 acts as a PEA3 coactivator by forming complexes with PEA3 on MMP2 and MMP9 promoters to enhance their expression in both mouse and human breast cancer cells. Furthermore, a AIB1 splice isoform lacking the N-terminal bHLH domain (due to the deletion of exon 4) that is overexpressed in breast cancer cells and tumors has also been shown to play critical roles in promoting cancer cell proliferation, invasion and metastasis through acting as a missing adaptor protein that bridges the interaction between EGFR and FAK (a non-receptor tyrosine kinase) following EGF stimulation (69).
Influence of AIB1 on tumor suppressor gene and cancer
A hallmark of cancer is often an improper balance between cell proliferation and apoptosis. Oncogene activation coupled with loss of tumor suppressor function would enable the cell to escape senescence and apoptosis, thereby providing an advantage for tumorigenesis. A number of studies have demonstrated the involvement of AIB1 in apoptosis. For example, knockdown of AIB1 by siRNA in human chronic myeloid leukemia K562 cells reduces activation of NF-κB signaling, ultimately leading to apoptosis (70), while overexpression of AIB1 in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells has the reverse effect (71). A study by Ferragud et al (72) revealed that AIB1 acts as a negative regulator for DROI, a tumor suppressor gene that was first identified as upregulated in brown adipose tissue of mice deficient in bombesin receptor subtype-3 (73). The function of DROI as a tumor suppressor gene was later demonstrated when its expression was shown to be highly reduced in colon and pancreatic cancers (74). Further investigation revealed that DROI plays an important role in adipogenesis through downregulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling and inducing C/EBPα and PPARγ (75). The expression of DROI was significantly reduced in mouse mammary epithelial cells or human primary cultures overexpressing AIB1 (72). Furthermore, DROI expression levels decreased in MCF-7 cells treated with estrogen but increased when treated with tamoxifen. Another study identified the tumor suppressor 53BP1 (a DNA-damaging response protein) as a novel AIB1-interacting protein, and through chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and siRNA knockdown experiments, AIB1 and 53BP1 were shown to co-occupy the same region of the breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) promoter, and both proteins were required for BRCA1 expression in HeLa cells (76). There was no evidence to indicate that AIB1 plays a direct role in DNA damage response; however, these authors concluded that the association between 53BP1 and AIB1 may modulate the transcriptional response of the BRCA1 gene and possibly regulate the activity of a subset of target genes involved in DNA repair. Taken together, these results demonstrate yet another mechanistic feature of AIB1 in cancer development, one that occurs via its suppression of tumor suppressor genes.
Conclusion
For the past few decades, endocrine therapy has been the most effective treatment for women with ER-positive breast cancer. However, the emergence of resistance to endocrine therapy has prompted the search for a different strategy, which involves targeting both ER and growth factor receptor signaling (77). Therapeutic approaches that simultaneously target ER and components of growth factor signaling, such as EGFR, HER2 and PI3K, have had some success in the preclinical setting. However, extensive further study is required to take this approach beyond the preclinical setting. As far as the role of AIB1 in breast cancer is concerned, given the pleiotropic effect of this coactivator and the complexity of the signaling network that it participates in and regulates, it becomes a great challenge to conceive of a long-term therapeutic strategy that effectively eliminates the cancer and prevents recurrence of the disease. Post-translational modification of AIB1 in the form of phosphorylation and its relevance to cancer is still not fully elucidated, and there has been suggestion that if the phosphoforms of AIB1 are important in human malignant disease then targeting these phosphoforms of AIB1 may be a useful therapeutic approach (17). Interrupting nuclear receptor coactivator interactions has been suggested to be beneficial in treating nuclear receptor-mediated diseases, including breast cancer (19). However, specifically targeting AIB1 or any of its associated transcription factors, coactivators or accessory proteins is unlikely to be effective, since such a measure is likely to upset the overall cellular reaction network in the long term, resulting in potential side effects. Nevertheless, future research should focus on gaining more insight into the mechanistic functions and regulations of AIB1, particularly those concerned with its dysfunctions that ultimately trigger the onset of cancers. Studies on the post-translational modifications (including sumoylation, which still requires extensive research) that govern the regulation and turnover of the AIB1 protein with respect to its modulation of cancer development and progression are also important and relevant to the overall therapeutic strategy for combating breast cancers mediated by this transcriptional coactivator.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a grant (30771221 to H.W.) from the National Natural Science Foundation of China and a grant (973 Program 2011CB504201 to H.W.) from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China.
