Cytokine‑induced killer cell therapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A case report and review of the literature
- Authors:
- Published online on: February 19, 2013 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2013.1200
- Pages: 1427-1429
Abstract
Introduction
The typical characteristics of pancreatic adenocarcinoma are its early local recurrence, systemic dissemination and poor response to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, thus rendering a poor prognosis with currently used treatment methods. The lack of traditional therapeutic options has motivated the search for novel immunotherapeutic approaches to pancreatic cancer, including cellular immunotherapy (1,2). At present, despite the development of chemotherapy drugs, research concerned with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma has only made modest progress, and the prognosis of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains extremely poor (3–5). Gemcitabine-based regimens are typically offered as standard approaches of care, and the majority of patients succumb within 6 months (6). The majority of elderly patients who undergo surgical resection are not able to tolerate the side-effects of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy following disease relapse. Celluar immunotherapy has become the fourth treatment method for malignant tumors (7–10), which may be a promising approach for these patients. Cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells are considered to be antitumor effector cells that are capable of rapid proliferation in vitro, with stronger antitumor activity and a broader spectrum of tumor targets than other described antitumor effector cells (10). Moreover, CIK cells are able to regulate and generally enhance immune function in cancer patients (11). There are limited data concerning adoptive immunotherapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In the present study, we describe a patient with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, who experienced a longer progression-free survival time (PFS) of >19 months, following administration of CIK cell immunotherapy. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Case report
A 77-year-old female was admitted to Henan Cancer Hospital, China, with intermittent abdominal pain for one month. Following investigation, pancreatic cancer was suspected by the surgeons. On October 14, 2010, the patient underwent resection of the pancreatic body and tail and the spleen. Analysis of the pancreatic mass revealed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, including squamous cell carcinoma differentiation, and the bilateral margins were positive. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) reexamination after one month revealed that a low-density nodule had emerged at the resection margin (Fig. 1A). Cancer- and tissue-specific markers tested, including carbohydrate antigen-199 (CA-199), carbohydrate antigen-724 (CA-724) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), were observed to be elevated. Notably, the CA-199 level had risen to 1,000 U/ml (reference range, 0–35 U/ml). Considering that the patient demonstrated poor health and low Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scores (50 scores), as well as being unable to tolerate the side-effects of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, CIK cell immunotherapy was administered. Mononuclear cells were collected from the patient’s 50 ml peripheral blood and cultured in GT-T551 medium containing anti-CD3 antibody, recombinant human interleukin-1α (IL-1α) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ), at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 24 h. Subsequently, recombinant human IL-2 (rhIL-2) was added to the medium. The medium was replaced by fresh IL-2- and IFN-γ-containing medium every 5 days. At day 10, CIK cells were harvested and their phenotypes were analyzed. All products were free of bacterial, mycoplasma and fungal contamination. The endotoxin level was <5 EU. Phenotypic analysis of autologous CIK cells in the patient prior to culture and following 10 days of cultivation demonstrated that the percentages of CD3+, CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+, CD3+CD56+ and CD25+ cell subsets increased from 45.40±5.21, 29.08±4.86, 18.80±5.45, 3.77±1.665 and 12.51±4.01% to 90.06±9.22, 44.50±8.18, 38.40±4.19, 15.21±4.53 and 31.75±5.87%, respectively (P<0.01). However, the percentages of CD3+/16+/56+, CD14+ and CD20+ cell subsets decreased from 14.73±3.54, 16.46±6.06 and 11.19±3.18% to 6.78±1.91, 5.87±2.09 and 7.84±2.53%, respectively (P<0.05). The total number of CIK cells in one cycle is ∼ 5×109. From November 10, 2010 to June 27, 2011, the patient recieved 4 cycles of CIK cell immunotherapy and 2 million units of IL-2 from day 1–5 per infusion of CIK cells. In the period of CIK cell therapy, no adverse reactions were observed. Following 4 cycles of CIK cell immunotherapy, the abdominal contrast-enhanced CT reexamination demonstrated that the low-density nodule reduced significantly (Fig. 1B). The cancer- and tissue-specific markers (CA-199, CA-724 and CEA) returned to their normal levels. The patient then received another 12 cycles of CIK cell immunotherapy. Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT examination indicated that the low-density nodule had slightly decreased (Fig. 1C) compared with the result demonstrated in Fig. 1B. The cancer- and tissue-specific marker levels (CA-199, CA-724 and CEA) remained at their normal levels. Following 16 cycles of CIK cell immunotherapy, it was recommended that the patient undergo abdominal contrast-enhanced CT examination every 3 months. The abdominal CT scan on February 29, 2012 demonstrated that the low-density nodule had almost disappeared (Fig. 1D). From March 7, 2012 to April 29, 2012, the patient received a further 4 cycles of CIK cell infusion to ensure treatment efficacy. However, on May 28, 2012, the abdominal contrast-enhanced CT scan revealed that the low-density nodule had emerged in the same place as previously, and the CA-199 level had elevated to 1,000 U/ml once more. At present, the progression-free survival time (PFS) of the patient is >19 months and the patient has not succumbed. During immunotherapy, the patient had a good quality of life and their KPS score increased from 50 to 80.
Discussion
In the field of oncology, pancreatic cancer remains a fatal disease with a poor prognosis, thus presenting a challenge for oncologists (12,13). In patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, the mean overall survival time is <6 months (6). Chemotherapy and radiotherapy are the most common approaches for treating locally relapsed and metastatic pancreatic cancer (14); however, the overall survival time is only modestly prolonged. Additionally, adverse reactions to chemotherapy/radiotherapy may be not tolerable in elderly patients. However, the lack of conventional therapeutic options is also important in motivating the search for novel therapeutic approaches to pancreatic cancer. In the present case, the patient was diagnosed with advanced pancreatic cancer, and had a poor prognosis following surgery. Additionally, the patient was not able to tolerate the side-effects of traditional chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Subsequently, CIK cell immunotherapy alone was administered to the patient, achieving a beneficial effect.
Presently, immunotherapy has become the fourth treatment modality for malignant tumors, and may be a promising approach for pancreatic cancer (7–10). Certain studies have demonstrated that CIK cells are heterogeneous cell populations that express CD3 and CD56 as well as the activation receptor of NK cells (NKG2D), antigen, and possess MHC-unrestricted cytotoxicity toward pancreatic cancer but not toward normal targets (15,16). CIK cells are considered to be a type of antitumor effector cells, and proliferate rapidly in vitro, with stronger antitumor activity in a broad spectrum of tumors (9,17). In addition, CIK cells regulate and enhance cellular immune functions in patients with pancreatic cancer by secretion of cytokines, such as interferon-γ, and a number of chemokines, including RANTES, MIP-1α and MIP-1β (18,19). The application of CIK cells as adoptive immunotherapy is important in cancer treatment. The application of CIK cells as adoptive immunotherapy in solid tumor treatment has been frequently reported in the literature (10,20). In particular, Liu et al applied CIK cells to treat 74 cases of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients in a randomized stage III clinical trial. The mean PFS was prolonged by 4 months and the mean overall survival time (mOS) was prolonged by 27 months compared with the control arm (10). Shi et al applied CIK cells to treat locally advanced gastric cancer patients and indicated that adjuvant immunotherapy with CIK cells prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) and significantly improved the mOS (21). However, there are few data concerned with applying CIK cells to treat pancreatic cancer in clinical practice. The present case provides a novel treatment option and further clinical practices are required to verify its efficacy.
In conclusion, we describe the case of a 77-year old female with pancreatic cancer who underwent surgery, although the bilateral margins were positive. After one month, imaging examination revealed that a low-density nodule had emerged at the resection margin. Considering the patient’s poor condition, low KPS scores and inability to tolerate the side-effects of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, the patient was treated with CIK cell immunotherapy. The patient achieved a PFS of >19 months, which was longer than that demonstrated by using chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. In conclusion, CIK immunotherapy may be an effective treatment method for advanced pancreatic cancer, particularly for elderly patients.
References
Laheru D and Jaffee EM: Immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer - science driving clinical progress. Nat Rev Cancer. 5:459–467. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vizio B, Novarino A, Giacobino A, et al: Potential plasticity of T regulatory cells in pancreatic carcinoma in relation to disease progression and outcome. Exp Ther Med. 4:70–78. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Franssen B and Chan C: Pancreatic Cancer: The surgeons point of view. Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 76:353–361. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Janes RJ, Niederhuber JE, Chmiel JS, et al: National patterns of care for pancreatic cancer. Results of a survey by the Commission on Cancer. Ann Surg. 223:261–272. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Moss RA and Lee C: Current and emerging therapies for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 3:111–127. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Koido S, Homma S, Takahara A, et al: Current immunotherapeutic approaches in pancreatic cancer. Clin Dev Immunol. 2011:2675392011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dougan M and Dranoff G: Immune therapy for cancer. Annu Rev Immunol. 27:83–117. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Hontscha C, Borck Y, Zhou H, et al: Clinical trials on CIK cells: first report of the international registry on CIK cells (IRCC). J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 137:305–310. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schwaab T, Schwarzer A, Wolf B, et al: Clinical and immunologic effects of intranodal autologous tumor lysate-dendritic cell vaccine with Aldesleukin (Interleukin 2) and IFN-{alpha}2a therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. Clin Cancer Res. 15:4986–4992. 2009.PubMed/NCBI | |
Liu L, Zhang W, Qi X, et al: Randomized study of autologous cytokine-induced killer cell immunotherapy in metastatic renal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 18:1751–1759. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schmidt-Wolf IG, Lefterova P, Mehta BA, et al: Phenotypic characterization and identification of effector cells involved in tumor cell recognition of cytokine-induced killer cells. Exp Hematol. 21:1673–1679. 1993.PubMed/NCBI | |
Werner J and Buchler MW: management of pancreatic cancer: recent advances. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 136:1807–1810. 2011.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ng J, Zhang C, Gidea-Addeo D, et al: Locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: update and progress. JOP. 13:155–158. 2012.PubMed/NCBI | |
Cardenes HR, Chiorean EG, Dewitt J, et al: Locally advanced pancreatic cancer: current therapeutic approach. Oncologist. 11:612–623. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Karimi M, Cao TM, Baker JA, et al: Silencing human NKG2D, DAP10, and DAP12 reduces cytotoxicity of activated CD8+ T cells and NK cells. J Immunol. 175:7819–7828. 2005.PubMed/NCBI | |
Verneris MR, Karami M, Baker J, et al: Role of NKG2D signaling in the cytotoxicity of activated and expanded CD8+ T cells. Blood. 103:3065–3072. 2004.PubMed/NCBI | |
Li R, Wang C, Liu L, et al: Autologous cytokine-induced killer cell immunotherapy in lung cancer: a phase II clinical study. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 61:2125–2133. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schmidt-Wolf IG, Lefterova P, Mehta BA, et al: Phenotypic characterization and identification of effector cells involved in tumor cell recognition of cytokine-induced killer cells. Exp Hematol. 21:1673–1679. 1993.PubMed/NCBI | |
Joshi PS, Liu JQ, Wang Y, et al: Cytokine-induced killer T cells kill immature dendritic cells by tcr-independent and perforin-dependent mechanisms. J Leukoc Biol. 80:1345–1353. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mesiano G, Todorovic M, Gammaitoni L, et al: Cytokine-induced killer (cik) cells as feasible and effective adoptive immunotherapy for the treatment of solid tumors. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 12:673–684. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shi L, Zhou Q, Wu J, et al: Efficacy of adjuvant immunotherapy with cytokine-induced killer cells in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 61:2251–2259. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |