Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy of lung lesions: Diagnostic yield and correlation between factors and complications

  • Authors:
    • Ying Wang
    • Wentao Li
    • Xinhong He
    • Guodong Li
    • Lichao Xu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 12, 2013     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2013.1680
  • Pages: 288-294
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT)‑guided core needle biopsy (CNB) and to retrospectively analyze the correlation between the factors and complications of the procedure. Between January 2009 and June 2010, CNB was performed on 345 lung lesions in 343 patients. These patients were then followed up for at least two years. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the CNB diagnoses were calculated. The correlation between factors, such as smoking, positoin and maximal diameter, and the complications of pneumothorax and hemorrhage was analyzed by χ2 test. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of the CNB diagnoses were 97.3, 100, 97.7, 100 and 87.7%, respectively. A statistically significant correlation was found between pneumothorax and the factors of smoking (P=0.015) and position (P<0.01) and length of the needle in the normal parenchyma (P=0.011), as well as between hemorrhage and the maximal diameter (P=0.005) and length of the needle in the normal parenchyma (P<0.01) and the frequency of needle adjustments (P<0.01). A CT‑guided core needle biopsy of the lung lesions provides a high diagnostic yield. Smoking, the decubitus position and a longer length of the needle in the normal parenchyma were found to represent risk factors for a pneumothorax. In addition, a small diameter and longer length of the needle in the normal parenchyma and a more frequent adjustment of the needle were poor predictive factors of hemorrhage.

Introduction

With the development of computed tomogrphy (CT), an increasing number of lung lesions are detected. It has been reported that >50% of resected pulmonary nodular lesions are related to malignancy; therefore, the requirement for rapid and definite diagnoses of lung lesions has been stressed (1)CT-guided needle biopsy has become the dominant method for obtaining tissue samples from lung lesions in order to obtain a pathological diagnosis (2). The procedure is generally regarded as safe, but pneumothorax, hemorrhage and other rare complications may occur. In addition, the reliability of a benign result remains controversial (3). The objective of the current study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) and to retrospectively analyze the correlation between factors and complications of the procedure.

Materials and methods

Study population

Between January 2009 and June 2010, a CNB was performed on a total of 343 patients with 345 lung lesions in 345 sessions. Among them, two patients received a second CNB, as the size of the tissue sample was not large enough to obtain pathological results. These patients were then followed up for at least two years. The enrolled population consisted of 228 males (66.5%) and 115 females (33.5%). The patient age ranged between 17 and 86 years old (mean age, 60±18.3 years old). The study was approved by the ethics committee of Fudan University (Shanghai, China).

Procedure

Prior to the procedure, the risks and benefits were explained to each patient and informed consent was obtained. Three interventional physicians, each with >5 years experience of needle biopsies, performed the procedures. All cases were performed using the Philips 64-slice spiral CT (120 kV, 250 mA and a 3-mm thickness; Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA, USA) for imaging guidance. The biopsy tool that was used was an automated biopsy gun (SuperCore™, Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada) with an 18-gauge needle. The patient lay on the CT table and the puncture point and access routine were determined by CT scan. Following local anesthesia, the needle was inserted through the skin and advanced to the lesion. Intra-operative CT scans were performed to confirm the position of the lesion and needle. Once the needle was located in an appropriate position within or near the lesion, the operator triggered the cannula to close, trapping the specimen in the sample notch. Next, the tissue specimen was removed from the notch and sent to the Department of Pathology (Fudan University, Shanghai, China). Immediately after the procedure, a chest CT scan was performed to evaluate procedural complications, including pneumothorax and hemorrhage. In addition, a chest radiograph was obtained the following morning. The baseline characteristics of the lesions and procedures are summarized in Table I.

Table I

Characteristics of lesions and procedures.

Table I

Characteristics of lesions and procedures.

Characteristicn (range)
Maximal diameter, mm41.4 (8–134)
Lesion location
 Lobe
  Upper178
  Middle28
  Lower139
 Zone
  Outer54
  Middle114
  Inner177
Patient position
 Supine106
 Prone192
 Decubitus45
Frequency of needle adjustments1.6 (1–7)
Distance from skin puncture to needle tip, mm73.0 (4.8–139.6)
Distance from pleural puncture to needle tip, mm34.4 (8.9–87.8)
Length of needle through normal parenchyma, mm14.8 (0.0–59.7)
Classification of diagnoses and complications

The CNB results were divided into 4 categories: Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), malignant, benign and undetermined (3). AAH is a premalignant lesion of lung adenocarcinoma. Although AAH is not ranked as malignant, this category commonly undergoes carcinomatous change.

Final diagnoses were divided into 3 categories: Malignant, benign and undetermined. Malignant tumors were defined by: i) Cancer-associated mortality occurring during the follow-up period; ii) lesions representing complete response, partial response or progressive disease to chemotherapy according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (4); and iii) a histopathological examination showing malignant tumor tissue in the specimen received at surgical resection. Benign tumors were defined by: i) Lesions that disappeared or decreased in size with conservative treatment; ii) patient exhibited a positive microbiological conclusion (3,5); or iii) a histopathological examination showing no malignant tumor tissue in the specimen from surgical resection. Undetermined tumors were defined as: i) Lesions treated by radiofrequency ablation or stereotactic irradiation (6); ii) a lesion that was stable in size at follow-up; or iii) a patient that could not be contacted for follow-up (Table II).

Table II

CNB and final diagnosis.

Table II

CNB and final diagnosis.

Final diagnosis

CNB diagnosisBenignMalignantUndetermined
Benign5079
AAH030
Malignant02506
Undetermined2711

[i] CNB, core needle biopsy; AAH, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia.

AAH and malignant were considered to be positive results and benign was considered a negative result. Positive CNB results were considered true positives if the final diagnosis was malignant or AAH. By contrast, results were considered false positives if the final diagnosis was benign. Negative CNB results were considered true negatives if the final diagnosis was benign and false negatives if the final diagnosis was malignant or AAH (Table III).

Table III

Positive and negative diagnosis.

Table III

Positive and negative diagnosis.

Final diagnosis

CNB diagnosesPositiveNegativeTotal
Positive2530253
Negative75057
Total26050310

[i] Undetermined CNB diagnoses and final diagnoses were excluded from calculation. CNB, core needle biopsy.

Pneumothorax was graded as mild (lung surface retraction of ≤2 cm; Fig. 1), moderate (lung surface retraction of 2–4 cm) and severe (lung surface retraction of ≥4 cm) (7). Hemorrhage was graded as mild (presenting as haziness along the needle tract; Fig. 2), moderate (hemoptysis of <30 ml or occurrence of patchy haziness around the lesion in CT; Fig. 3) and severe (hemoptysis of ≥30 ml or hemothorax).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed with SPSS 19.0; the χ2 test was used for the statistical analysis. The analysis of pneumothorax and hemorrhage was based on the 345 CNB sessions not the 343 patients. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

CNB diagnoses included 66 benign cases, 3 AAH cases, 256 malignant cases and 20 undetermined cases; final diagnoses consisted of 52 benign cases, 267 malignant cases and 26 undetermined cases. Final diagnoses were obtained based on the following characteristics: 11 (3.2%) patients succumbed to cancer-associated mortalities; 64 (18.7%) surgical specimens, 12 (3.5%) positive cultures; 193 (56.2%) positive responses to chemotherapy; 37 (10.8%) tumors disappeared or decreased in size with conservative treatment; 8 (2.3%) lesions were treated with radiofrequency ablation (n=2) or stereotactic irradiation (n=6); 5 (1.5%) lesions were stable during the follow-up period; and 13 (3.8%) patients could not be contacted for follow-up. Following exclusion of the undetermined CNB and final diagnoses (n=35) (8), the number of true positives, false positives, true negatives and false negatives were 253, 0, 50 and 7, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 97.3, 100, 97.7, 100 and 87.7%, respectively.

In the present study, the overall complication rate was 50.4%. There was a total of 60 (17.5%) cases of pneumothorax in the 343 patients. Among those, 52 (15.2%) were mild, 6 (1.7%) were moderate and 2 (0.6%) were severe. Only 5 (1.5%) required placement of chest tubes. There were 113 (32.9%) cases of hemorrhage in this study. Of those, 78 (22.7%) were mild hemorrhage, 35 (10.2%) were moderate hemorrhage. No severe hemorrhage occurred. One of the patients with moderate hemorrhage complained of chest pain and chest tightness 8 h after the biopsy; the chest radiograph indicated a parenchymal hemorrhage and hemocoagulase was administrated. Another patient developed hypotension with syncope, and resuscitation and hemocoagulase administration improved the individual’s condition. All other hemorrhages were self-limited.

The correlation between factors and complications was determined, and a statistically significant correlation was found between pneumothorax and the factors of smoking and the position and length of the needle in the normal parenchyma (P=0.011). In addition, a statistically significant correlation existed between hemorrhage and the maximal diameter (P=0.005) and length of the needle in the normal parenchyma (P<0.01) and the frequency of needle adjustments (P<0.01). The correlations between factors and complications are shown in Tables IV and V.

Table IV

Correlation between factors and pneumothorax.

Table IV

Correlation between factors and pneumothorax.

CharacteristicPneumothorax, nNon-pneumothorax, nP-value
Gender0.956
 Male40189
 Female2195
Age, years0.986
 17–491258
 50–6934146
 70–861580
Smoking status0.015a
 Non-smoker1744
 Current or ex-smoker20126
 Unknown24114
Patient position0.000a
 Supine1689
 Prone25170
 Decubitus2025
Lesion location
 Lobe0.568
  Upper29158
  Middle525
  Lower27101
 Zone0.115
  Outer1441
  Middle2486
  Inner23157
Effusion0.181
 No56246
 Yes538
Maximal diameter, cm0.605
 ≤124
 1–32289
 3–526107
 >51184
Length of needle through normal parenchyma, mm0.011a
 <114124
 1–331102
 ≥31658
Needle-hilus angle, °0.156
 0–302295
 30–6032125
 60–90763
Needle adjustments0.285
 138176
 2–31483
 ≥4925
Operator/s0.210
 134136
 21560
 31288

a Statistically significant difference.

Table V

Correlation between factors and hemorrhage.

Table V

Correlation between factors and hemorrhage.

CharacteristicHemorrhage, nNon-hemorrhage, nP-value
Gender0.747
 Male75154
 Female4076
Age, years0.455
 17–492743
 50–6955125
 70–863362
Smoking status0.697
 Non-smoker2041
 Current or ex-smoker5294
 Unknown4395
Patient position0.211
 Supine3273
 Prone72123
 Decubitus1134
Lesion location
 Lobe0.466
  Upper65122
  Middle723
  Lower4385
 Zone0.336
  Outer1441
  Middle3674
  Inner65115
Effusion0.134
 No1033
 Yes105197
Maximal diameter, cm0.005a
 ≤151
 1–34368
 3–54588
 >52273
Length of needle through normal parenchyma, mm0.000a
 <118120
 1–34984
 ≥34826
Needle-hilus angle, °0.465
 0–303681
 30–6055102
 60–902347
Needle adjustments0.000a
 153161
 2–34859
 ≥41420
Operator/s0.797
 155115
 22451
 33664

a Statistically significant difference.

Discussion

In the present study, the incidence of pneumothorax was 17.5%, with 1.5% requiring chest tube drainage. These results are comparable to prior studies (911). The decubitus position was found to result in more pneumothoraxes than the supine and prone positions. We hypothesize that the decubitus position separates the parietal and visceral pleura more than the other positions and therefore, air is more likely to enter the pleural cavity as the needle is taken out. Moreover, the majority of lung lesions were found to be located in the middle or inner zone of the lung in the present study. In the biopsy of lesions located in the middle or inner zone of the lung, it is more difficult to keep away from the interlobar pleural; if it is damged, it is more likely to result in pneumothorax. O’Neill et al(12) reported that rapidly (within 10 sec) rolling the patient over to the biopsy-side-down position following needle-out reduced the rate of overall pneumothorax and pneumothorax necessitating a drainage catheter. Moreover, smoking, the decubitus position and a longer length needle in the normal parenchyma were risk factors for a pneumothorax. It is generally considered that a pneumothorax is the most common complication of a needle biopsy of the lung (11,13). However, in the present study, the incidence of hemorrhage (32.9%) was higher than pneumothorax (17.5%) and also higher than the 1–27% reported in the literature (7,11,14). This may be since a pneumothorax is easier to identify in chest radiographs and its obvious symptoms are apt to attract notice. By contrast, mild hemorrhage is difficult to identify in chest radiographs. Furthermore, the current data was based on the presence of haziness on CT images and hemoptysis, instead of hemoptysis only. The results showed that a small diameter and longer length of the needle in the normal parenchyma and more frequent adjustments of the needle were poor predictive factors of hemorrhage.

With regard to pathological yield, in the present study, the false positive and false negative rates and the PPV and NPV were 0, 2.7, 100 and 87.7%, respectively. When a malignant diagnosis is identified by needle biopsy, the clinical decision-making process is generally straightforward due to the extremely low false-positive rates (0.0–1%) (3,15). However, when a benign diagnosis is obtained, there is clinical uncertainty over how to proceed, as a number of these lesions may prove to be malignant (false negatives). Previous studies have evaluated the outcomes following a benign biopsy and have found false negative rates that vary widely (2–54%) (1618). Combining the results of the present and relevant previous studies, we recommend that patients with benign CNB diagnoses undergo repeat imaging for ≥2 years to document the stability or resolution of the lesions. If the nodule grows, a repeat biopsy (1921) or resection (22) may be required to obtain a definitive diagnosis.

The main limitations of the present study were as follows: Firstly, in the analysis of the correlation between factors and complications, single factors were considered individually without excluding the affect of other factors. Secondly, a small number of patients were lost for follow-up and a two-year follow-up may not have been sufficient.

In conclusion, CT-guided core needle biopsy of the lung lesions provides a high diagnostic yield. Smoking, the decubitus position and a longer length of needle in the normal parenchyma were risk factors for pneumothorax. In addition, small diameter, a longer length of needle in the normal parenchyma and more frequent adjustments of the needle were poor predictive factors of hemorrhage.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Science Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (nos. 0952nm03400 and 11nm0504000).

References

1 

Shah PL, Singh S, Bower M, Livni N, Padley S and Nicholson AG: The role of transbronchial fine needle aspiration in an integrated care pathway for the assessment of patients with suspected lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 1:324–327. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

2 

Zhou Y, Thiruvalluvan K, Krzeminski L, et al: CT-guided robotic needle biopsy of lung nodules with respiratory motion - experimental system and preliminary test. Int J Med Robot. 9:317–330. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Gelbman BD, Cham MD, Kim W, et al: Radiographic and clinical characterization of false negative results from CT-guided needle biopsies of lung nodules. J Thorac Oncol. 7:815–820. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Padhani AR and Ollivier L: The RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria: implications for diagnostic radiologists. Br J Radiol. 74:983–986. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Jae LI, June IH, Miyeon Y, et al: Percutaneous core needle biopsy for small (≤10 mm) lung nodules: accurate diagnosis and complication rates. Diagn Interv Radiol. 18:527–530. 2012.

6 

Inoue D, Gobara H, Hiraki T, et al: CT fluoroscopy-guided cutting needle biopsy of focal pure ground-glass opacity lung lesions: diagnostic yield in 83 lesions. Eur J Radiol. 81:354–359. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Yildirim E, Kirbas I, Harman A, et al: CT-guided cutting needle lung biopsy using modified coaxial technique: factors effecting risk of complications. Eur J Radiol. 70:57–60. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar

8 

Kim GR, Hur J, Lee SM, et al: CT fluoroscopy - guided lung biopsy versus conventional CT-guided lung biopsy: a prospective controlled study to assess radiation doses and diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol. 21:232–239. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

9 

Tomiyama N, Yasuhara Y, Nakajima Y, et al: CT-guided needle biopsy of lung lesions: a survey of severe complication based on 9783 biopsies in Japan. Eur J Radiol. 59:60–64. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Laurent F, Montaudon M, Latrabe V and Bégueret H: Percutaneous biopsy in lung cancer. Eur J Radiol. 45:60–68. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar

11 

Wu CC, Maher MM and Shepard JA: Complications of CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of the chest: prevention and management. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 196:W678–W682. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

12 

O’Neill AC, McCarthy C, Ridge CA, et al: Rapid needle-out patient-rollover time after percutaneous CT-guided transthoracic biopsy of lung nodules: effect on pneumothorax rate. Radiology. 262:314–319. 2012.

13 

Wu RH, Tzeng WS, Lee WJ, et al: CT-guided transthoracic cutting needle biopsy of intrathoracic lesions: comparison between coaxial and single needle technique. Eur J Radiol. 81:e712–e716. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Wiener RS, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S and Welch HG: Population-based risk of complications following transthoracic needle lung biopsy of a pulmonary nodule. Ann Intern Med. 155:137–144. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Manhire A, Charig M, Clelland C, et al: Guidelines for radio-logically guided lung biopsy. Thorax. 58:920–936. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Schreiber G and McCrory DC: Performance characteristics of different modalities for diagnosis of suspected lung cancer: summary of published evidence. Chest. 123(1 Suppl): 115S–128S. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Savage C, Walser EM, Schnadig V, et al: Transthoracic image-guided biopsy of lung nodules: when is benign really benign? J Vasc Interv Radiol. 15:161–164. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Anderson JM, Murchison J and Patel D: CT-guided lung biopsy: factors influencing diagnostic yield and complication rate. Clin Radiol. 58:791–797. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Lee YJ, Hwang Y, Kim TJ, et al: Inconclusive result from CT guided transthoracic needle aspiration and biopsy: affecting factors and final outcome. J Lung Cancer. 10:94–101. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

20 

Lee IJ, Bae YA, Kim DG, et al: Percutaneous needle aspiration biopsy (PCNAB) of lung lesions: 5 years results with focusing on repeat PCNAB. Eur J Radiol. 73:551–554. 2010.

21 

Khouri NF, Stitik FP, Erozan YS, et al: Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of benign and malignant lung lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 144:281–288. 1985. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

22 

Lee WT, Wang Y, He XH, et al: Combination of CT-guided hookwire localization and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for pulmonary nodular lesions: Analysis of 103 patients. Oncology Letters. 4:824–828. 2012.

Related Articles

Journal Cover

2014-January
Volume 7 Issue 1

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Wang Y, Li W, He X, Li G and Xu L: Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy of lung lesions: Diagnostic yield and correlation between factors and complications. Oncol Lett 7: 288-294, 2014.
APA
Wang, Y., Li, W., He, X., Li, G., & Xu, L. (2014). Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy of lung lesions: Diagnostic yield and correlation between factors and complications. Oncology Letters, 7, 288-294. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2013.1680
MLA
Wang, Y., Li, W., He, X., Li, G., Xu, L."Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy of lung lesions: Diagnostic yield and correlation between factors and complications". Oncology Letters 7.1 (2014): 288-294.
Chicago
Wang, Y., Li, W., He, X., Li, G., Xu, L."Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy of lung lesions: Diagnostic yield and correlation between factors and complications". Oncology Letters 7, no. 1 (2014): 288-294. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2013.1680