Acquired resistance L747S mutation in an epidermal growth factor receptor‑tyrosine kinase inhibitor‑naïve patient: A report of three cases

  • Authors:
    • Fumihiro  Yamaguchi
    • Kunihiko  Fukuchi
    • Yohei  Yamazaki
    • Hiromi Takayasu
    • Sakiko  Tazawa
    • Hidetsugu  Tateno
    • Eisuke  Kato
    • Aya  Wakabayashi
    • Mami  Fujimori
    • Takuya  Iwasaki
    • Makoto  Hayashi
    • Yutaka  Tsuchiya
    • Jun  Yamashita
    • Norikazu  Takeda
    • Fumio  Kokubu
  • View Affiliations

  • Published online on: November 25, 2013     https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2013.1705
  • Pages: 357-360
Metrics: Total Views: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )
Total PDF Downloads: 0 (Spandidos Publications: | PMC Statistics: )


Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to report cases of epidermal growth factor receptor‑tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR‑TKI)‑naïve patients carrying a mutation associated with acquired resistance to the drug. Gene alterations in 77 lung carcinoma patients were analyzed by collecting and studying curette lavage fluid at the time of diagnosis. PCRs were performed to amplify mutation hotspot regions in EGFR genes. The PCR products were direct‑sequenced and the mutations confirmed by resequencing using different primers. Case 1 was a 78‑year‑old Japanese male diagnosed with stage IB lung adenocarcinoma who was found to have two EGFR mutations, G719S and L747S. Case 2 was a 73‑year‑old Japanese male diagnosed with stage IV squamous cell lung carcinoma and bone metastasis who had the EGFR mutation, L747S. Case 3 was an 82‑year‑old Japanese male diagnosed with hyponatremia due to inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone and stage IIIB small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) who had the EGFR mutation, L747S. Thus, the EGFR mutation L747S associated with acquired EGFR‑TKI resistance was detected in two non‑small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients and one SCLC patient, none of whom had ever received EGFR‑TKI. The patients were current smokers with stages at diagnosis ranging from IB to IV, and their initial tumors contained resistant clones carrying L747S. L747S may be associated with primary resistance. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first report of an EGFR mutation associated with resistance to EGFR‑TKI in SCLC patients. The early detection of EGFR‑TKI resistance mutations may be beneficial in making treatment decisions for lung carcinoma patients, including those with SCLC.

Introduction

The efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) for treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients with EGFR activating mutations is well established. Several prospective studies have observed that first-line EGFR-TKI treatment leads to longer progression-free survival in NSCLC patients with such EGFR mutations compared with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (14). Hence the presence of EGFR-activating mutations can be used to determine whether to administer EGFR-TKI to NSCLC patients. In addition, EGFR mutations associated with primary resistance or acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI have been identified (5). Therefore, the ability to detect both types of EGFR mutations is important in making treatment decisions for NSCLC patients. To date, there have been numerous reports of EGFR mutations, including alterations associated with drug sensitivity or drug resistance. EGFR-activating mutations, specifically a deletion in exon 19 and the missense mutation L858R in exon 21, have been reported most frequently, accounting for >90% of mutations in EGFR(6,7). By contrast, insertions in exon 20 and missense mutation T790M in exon 21 are described as primary resistance mutations for EGFR-TKI. Four EGFR mutations have been associated with acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI, L747S, D761Y, T790M and T854A (8,9), but the mechanism for acquiring these mutations remains unclear. In the present study, L747S was identified in three patients who had never received EGFR-TKI therapy, indicating that the initial tumor contained resistant clones carrying L747S in varying proportions.

Case report

Method

Gene alterations in 77 lung carcinoma patients were analyzed by collecting and studying curette lavage fluid at the time of diagnosis. DNA was extracted from cells attached to the curette and PCR was performed to amplify mutation hotspot regions in the EGFR genes, as described previously (10). The PCR products were direct-sequenced and the mutations were then confirmed by resequencing using different primers. Approval for the study was obtained in advance from the Ethics Committee for Genomic Research at Showa University (Tokyo, Japan; approval number 113). The patients provided written informed consent.

Results

Overall, 27% (21 of 77) were found with EGFR mutations, including L747S detected in three patients.

Case 1

Table I shows the patient characteristics and their mutation statuses. A 78-year-old Japanese male with a current smoking history of 45 pack-years was referred to Showa University Fujiguoka Hospital (Yokohama, Japan) due to a screen-detected abnormal chest X-ray. As a result, the patient was diagnosed with stage IB lung adenocarcinoma. A computed-tomography (CT) scan of the chest at diagnosis revealed a primary tumor, 15-mm in size, in the right upper lobe. The levels of the tumor markers, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CYFRA21-1 and pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (Pro-GRP), were within normal limits. The lobe was completely resected with a lymph node dissection. No recurrence was observed during two years after surgery. The tumor was found to have two EGFR mutations, G719S and L747S. Neither mutation was detected in the genomic DNA extracted from the normal tissue of the lung.

Table I

Clinical characteristics and mutation status.

Table I

Clinical characteristics and mutation status.

CharacteristicCase 1Case 2Case 3
Age, years787382
GenderMMM
StageIBIVIIIB
Cytological diagnosisAdSqSCLC
Tobacco, pack-years458030
EGFR mutationG719S, L747SL747SL747S
Tumor marker
 CEA, ng/ml1.71.910.5
 CYFRA21-1, ng/ml2.02.41.4
 Pro-GRP, pg/ml25.327.2468.1

[i] M, Male; Ad, adenocarcinoma; Sq, sequamous cell carcinoma; SCLC, small cell lung carcinoma; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; Pro-GRP, pro-gastrin-releasing peptide.

Case 2

A 73-year-old Japanese male with a smoking history of 80 pack-years was diagnosed with stage IV squamous cell lung carcinoma and bone metastasis, found due to a chest X-ray abnormality that was detected during a routine checkup. A CT scan of the chest showed that the majority of the right upper lobe consisted of a neoplasm, and that the tumor had infiltrated the mediastinum. The levels of the tumor markers, CEA, CYFRA21-1 and Pro-GRP, were within normal limits. The patient possessed the EGFR mutation, L747S. Single-agent chemotherapy consisting of 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine was administered at on days 1, 8 and 15. The therapy was repeated every four weeks for two cycles; however, the patient failed this therapy and succumbed within four months of diagnosis. Neither normal tissue nor whole blood was available for further analysis.

Case 3

An 82-year-old Japanese male with a smoking history of 30 pack-years was hospitalized (Showa University Fujiguoka Hospital) due to extreme fatigue. The patient’s serum sodium level was 113 mEq/ml upon admission. The patient was diagnosed with hyponatremia, due to the inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone, and with stage IIIB small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). As shown in Table I, the tumor markers, CEA and Pro-GRP, were elevated with values of 10.5 and 468.1 pg/ml, respectively. The patient possessed the EGFR mutation, L747S. The patient received carboplatin at a dose of AUC 5.0 every four weeks on day 1, and etoposide at a dose of 80 mg/m2 every four weeks on days 1, 2 and 3. A total of 16 cycles were administered in the last two years. L747S was not detected in the genomic DNA from a whole blood sample.

Sequencing

As shown in Fig. 1, samples from each subject were direct-sequenced and the mutations were then confirmed by sequencing using different forward and reverse primers. In summary, the present study revealed that the EGFR mutation, L747S, was detected in male smokers with >30 pack-years each, and who were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and SCLC. Among these cases, two of the L747S mutations were confirmed to be somatic.

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to report cases of EGFR-TKI-naïve patients carrying the EGFR mutation, L747S, which is associated with acquired resistance to the drug. Previous studies have revealed that acquired resistance mutations, including L747S, are rare (8,9). There have also been few reports of L747S detection in lung carcinoma patients who have not yet received treatment (11,12). In the present study, 3.9% (3/77) EGFR-TKI-naïve patients were identified with L747S, as reported previously (10). Tumor cells carrying L747S may have an advantage in carcinoma progression. L747S was identified in two NSCLC patients and in one SCLC patient, all of whom were male smokers. L747S was not associated with staging. As summarized in Table I, no patients showed overlap with a deletion in exon 19 or L858R in exon 21, whereas one adenocarcinoma patient carried G719S in exon 18. No pathogenesis of an acquired resistance mutation was evident. Two possible mechanisms of acquiring EGFR-TKI resistance have been proposed. One hypothesis is that the initial tumor includes cells carrying resistance mutations that exist prior to EGFR-TKI therapy. The second hypothesis is that tumor cells acquire novel resistance mutations during therapy. These two hypotheses assume that resistant clones are selected through EGFR-TKI therapy. The present study revealed that three smokers who had never received EGFR-TKI therapy harbored the EGFR mutation, L747S. The initial tumor in each case likely contained resistant clones carrying L747S in varying proportions, consistent with the former hypothesis. This mutation may also be associated with the primary resistance to EGFR-TKI therapy. The presence of L747S in EGFR should therefore be noted, particularly for patients with EGFR-activating mutations, since dose escalation of EGFR-TKI may overcome resistance due to the mutation (13,14). Notably, L747S may be detected only by direct-sequencing, and not by the Scorpion-amplification refractory mutation system or peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid PCR clamp methods commonly used in clinical practice (15).

There have been several reports of EGFR mutations in SCLC (1618), thus the mutation status of EGFR should be analyzed in NSCLC and SCLC. EGFR-TKI has been shown to induce a partial response in SCLC patients carrying EGFR-activating mutations, which are described as SCLC combined adenocarcinoma components (1921). In case 3, the Pro-GRP and CEA levels were elevated simultaneously, indicating that adenocarcinoma cells were included in the tumor. Studies have revealed a histological transformation from NSCLC into SCLC in combination with alterations of tumor markers in EGFR mutant patients who acquired EGFR-TKI resistance (22,23). The present study is the first report showing an EGFR mutation associated with resistance to EGFR-TKI therapy in an SCLC patient. This indicates that the mutation status in SCLC requires further investigation, and that it will be useful to detect EGFR-activating mutations or resistance mutations of EGFR-TKI in SCLC and NSCLC patients.

The EGFR mutation, L747S, was detected in two NSCLC patients and one SCLC patient, none of whom had ever received EGFR-TKI therapy. In addition to clonal selection of resistant cells in the initial tumor, cells carrying L747S may predominate following EGFR-TKI therapy. L747S may be associated with primary EGFR-TKI resistance. The presence of L747S in EGFR should therefore be considered, particularly for patients with EGFR-activating mutations. The early detection of EGFR-TKI resistance mutations may be beneficial in making treatment decisions for lung carcinoma patients. In the future, analyses of EGFR mutations in lung carcinoma, including SCLC, should be continued.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from Eli Lilly Japan K.K. The authors would like to thank NAI, Inc., (http://www.nai.co.jp/) for proofreading this manuscript.

References

1 

Maemondo M, Inoue A, Kobayashi K, Sugawara S, Oizumi S, et al: Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N Engl J Med. 362:2380–2388. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

2 

Mitsudomi T, Morita S, Yatabe Y, Negoro S, Okamoto I, et al: Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 11:121–128. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar

3 

Zhou C, Wu YL, Chen G, Feng J, Liu XQ, et al: Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 12:735–742. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar

4 

Rosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R, Vergnenegre A, Massuti B, et al: Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 13:239–246. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

5 

Pao W and Girard N: New driver mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet Oncol. 12:175–180. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

6 

Mitsudomi T and Yatabe Y: Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene and related genes as determinants of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors sensitivity in lung cancer. Cancer Sci. 98:1817–1824. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar

7 

Tanaka T, Matsuoka M, Sutani A, Gemma A, Maemondo M, et al: Frequency of and variables associated with the EGFR mutation and its subtypes. Int J Cancer. 126:651–655. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

8 

Lin L and Bivona TG: Mechanisms of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and novel therapeutic strategies to overcome resistance in NSCLC patients. Chemother Res Pract. 2012:8172972012.

9 

Suda K, Mizuuchi H, Maehara Y and Mitsudomi T: Acquired resistance mechanisms to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancer with activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-diversity, ductility, and destiny. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 31:807–814. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

10 

Yamaguchi F, Kugawa S, Tateno H, Kokubu F and Fukuchi K: Analysis of EGFR, KRAS and P53 mutations in lung cancer using cells in the curette lavage fluid obtained by bronchoscopy. Lung Cancer. 78:201–206. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

11 

Pallis AG, Voutsina A, Kalikaki A, Souqlakos J, Briasoulis E, et al: ‘Classical’ but not ‘other’ mutations of EGFR kinase domain are associated with clinical outcome in gefitinib-treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 97:1560–1566. 2007.

12 

Jia XL and Chen G: EGFR and KRAS mutations in Chinese patients with adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung. Lung Cancer. 74:396–400. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

13 

Costa DB, Schumer ST, Tenen DG and Kobayashi S: Differential responses to erlotinib in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung cancers with acquired resistance to gefitinib carrying the L747S or T790M secondary mutations. J Clin Oncol. 26:1182–1184. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar

14 

Costa DB, Nguyen KS, Cho BC, Sequist LV, Jackman DM, et al: Effects of erlotinib in EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancers with resistance to gefitinib. Clin Cancer Res. 14:7060–7067. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

15 

Goto K, Satouchi M, Ishii G, Nishio K, Hagiwara K, et al: An evaluation study of EGFR mutation tests utilized for non-small-cell lung cancer in the diagnostic setting. Ann Oncol. 23:2914–2919. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar

16 

Fukui T, Tsuta K, Furuta K, Watanabe S, Asamura H, et al: Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status and clinicopathological features of combined small cell carcinoma with adenocarcinoma of the lung. Cancer Sci. 98:1714–1719. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

17 

Morinaga R, Okamoto I, Furuta K, Kawano Y, Sekijima M, et al: Sequential occurrence of non-small cell and small cell lung cancer with the same EGFR mutation. Lung Cancer. 58:411–413. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

18 

Tatematsu A, Shimizu J, Murakami Y, Horio Y, Nakamura S, et al: Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 14:6092–6096. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

19 

Zakowski MF, Ladanyi M and Kris MG; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Lung Cancer OncoGenome Group. EGFR mutations in small-cell lung cancers in patients who have never smoked. N Engl J Med. 355:213–215. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

20 

Okamoto I, Araki J, Suto R, Shimada M, Nakagawa K and Fukuoka M: EGFR mutation in gefitinib-responsive small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 17:1028–1029. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

21 

Lu HY, Mao WM, Cheng QY, Chen B, Cai JF, et al: Mutation status of epidermal growth factor receptor and clinical features of patients with combined small cell lung cancer who received surgical treatment. Oncol Lett. 3:1288–1292. 2012.

22 

Sequist LV, Waltman BA, Dias-Santagata D, Digumarthy S, Turke AB, et al: Genotypic and histological evolution of lung cancers acquiring resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Sci Transl Med. 3:75ra262011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

23 

Alam N, Gustafson KS, Ladanyi M, Zakowski MF, Kapoor A, et al: Small-cell carcinoma with an epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in a never-smoker with gefitinib-responsive adenocarcinoma of the lung. Clin lung Cancer. 11:E1–E4. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI

Related Articles

Journal Cover

2014-February
Volume 7 Issue 2

Print ISSN: 1792-1074
Online ISSN:1792-1082

Sign up for eToc alerts

Recommend to Library

Copy and paste a formatted citation
x
Spandidos Publications style
Yamaguchi F, Fukuchi K, Yamazaki Y, Takayasu H, Tazawa S, Tateno H, Kato E, Wakabayashi A, Fujimori M, Iwasaki T, Iwasaki T, et al: Acquired resistance L747S mutation in an epidermal growth factor receptor‑tyrosine kinase inhibitor‑naïve patient: A report of three cases. Oncol Lett 7: 357-360, 2014.
APA
Yamaguchi, F., Fukuchi, K., Yamazaki, Y., Takayasu, H., Tazawa, S., Tateno, H. ... Kokubu, F. (2014). Acquired resistance L747S mutation in an epidermal growth factor receptor‑tyrosine kinase inhibitor‑naïve patient: A report of three cases. Oncology Letters, 7, 357-360. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2013.1705
MLA
Yamaguchi, F., Fukuchi, K., Yamazaki, Y., Takayasu, H., Tazawa, S., Tateno, H., Kato, E., Wakabayashi, A., Fujimori, M., Iwasaki, T., Hayashi, M., Tsuchiya, Y., Yamashita, J., Takeda, N., Kokubu, F."Acquired resistance L747S mutation in an epidermal growth factor receptor‑tyrosine kinase inhibitor‑naïve patient: A report of three cases". Oncology Letters 7.2 (2014): 357-360.
Chicago
Yamaguchi, F., Fukuchi, K., Yamazaki, Y., Takayasu, H., Tazawa, S., Tateno, H., Kato, E., Wakabayashi, A., Fujimori, M., Iwasaki, T., Hayashi, M., Tsuchiya, Y., Yamashita, J., Takeda, N., Kokubu, F."Acquired resistance L747S mutation in an epidermal growth factor receptor‑tyrosine kinase inhibitor‑naïve patient: A report of three cases". Oncology Letters 7, no. 2 (2014): 357-360. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2013.1705