Trastuzumab monotherapy for bone marrow metastasis of breast cancer: A case report
- Authors:
- Published online on: March 24, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2014.1999
- Pages: 1951-1953
Abstract
Introduction
Metastatic cancer of the bone marrow develops when malignant tumor cells of non-hematopoietic systems metastasize to the bone marrow by means of hematogenous dissemination or direct invasion. Micrometastasis in the bone marrow is detected in 30–40% of breast cancer patients (1,2) and this metastasis is manifested as the progressive aggravation of anemia in the short term, thrombocytopenia and a significantly declined performance status in the majority of patients. Notably, the median survival of patients with metastatic cancer of the bone marrow presenting with thrombocytopenia is only one month and chemotherapy is usually ineffective (3). The presence of micrometastasis in the bone marrow and its effect on prognosis has been shown in patients with identical stages of breast cancer, as defined by tumor size, histological grade, the presence or absence of lymph node metastasis and the expression of hormone receptors (4,5). However, the clinical treatment of such micrometastasis is limited due to the low statistical power of published studies and lack of clinical trials (6). The bone marrow metastasis of breast cancer is common and the current study presents a case of bone marrow metastasis of breast cancer whose peripheral blood cell counts completely returned to within the normal ranges following monotherapy with trastuzumab. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region (Shenyang, China) and the patient provided written informed consent.
Case report
The current study presents the case of a 41-year-old female who underwent modified radical mastectomy due to left breast infiltrating ductal cancer (pathological stage, IIA; pT1aN1M0) on May 30, 2010 at the General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region (Shenyang, China). The patient was negative for estrogen and progesterone receptors. In addition, the human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER-2) immunohistochemical analysis showed ++/+++ staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) indicated HER-2 gene amplification. Following the surgery, six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (docetaxel plus epirubicin regimen) in combination with sequential adjuvant radiotherapy were conducted. In May 2011, the patient felt pain at multiple sites on the body and subsequent positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT) examination indicated the following: Left cervical, left supraclavicular, mediastinal, retroperitoneal and pelvic lymph node metastases; superior lobe metastasis of the left lung; peritoneal metastasis; multiple osseous metastases; and tumors in the right appendix region. The patient had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 3 and numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score of 8. The results of the routine blood test showed that the lowest peripheral blood cell counts were 1.6×109 cells/l for white blood cells (WBCs), 54 g/l for hemoglobin (Hb) and 26×109 cells/l for platelets (PLTs). In addition, a bone marrow smear test revealed the presence of metastatic cancer cells (Fig. 1A). Trastuzumab monotherapy was subsequently initiated on June 1, 2011, at a loading dose of 8 mg/kg and a maintenance dose of 6 mg/kg every three weeks. During the night following administration of the initial dose of trastuzumab, the patient experienced fever (body temperature of 39.0°C) and more severe pain, which were alleviated by symptomatic treatment. Following trastuzumab treatment, the patient’s PLT count markedly increased (Fig. 2), while the WBC count and Hb concentration increased gradually. Furthermore, following four doses of trastuzumab treatment, the patient’s performance status score (ECOG) decreased to 1 and pain score (NRS) decreased to 2. On August 17, 2011, taxol chemotherapy was initiated at a dose of 75 mg/m2 on days two and nine, and was administered on the basis of trastuzumab. In total, seven cycles, each lasting 21 days, were completed. No cancer cells were identified in the subsequent bone marrow smear test (Fig. 1B). CT demonstrated metastatic foci in the left lung, however, the enlarged lymph nodes had subsided, and the tumor in the right appendix region had decreased in size by 50%. In April 2012, the trastuzumab treatment was withdrawn due to brain metastasis and in May 2012, the patient succumbed to disease progression.
Discussion
Bone marrow micrometastasis has already developed in almost one-third of patients with breast cancer at presentation. Furthermore, large tumor sizes, poor differentiation, lymph node metastasis and negative hormone receptors are risk factors for bone marrow metastasis (1). Severe bone marrow metastasis leads to severe bone marrow suppression, which restricts the efficacy of cytotoxic drugs in such patients. Few individual cases of bone marrow metastasis of breast cancer have been reported (7–10) and the clinical use of cytotoxic drugs continue to pose considerable risks.
Trastuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody which is directed against the extracellular domain of the HER-2 gene (11). Combined chemotherapy with trastuzumab has become a standard treatment for HER-2-overexpressing breast cancer (12–14). Despite the lack of high-level medical evidence supporting trastuzumab monotherapy as a treatment for metastatic breast cancer, significant clinical benefits have been highlighted in a phase II clinical study in the treatment of advanced breast cancer with HER-2 gene immunohistochemical scores of >3 or positive FISH tests (15). Furthermore, Tsutani et al (16) reported one case of complete remission in a patient with lung metastasis of breast cancer treated with trastuzumab alone. The individual in the present case was a patient with HER-2-overexpressing breast cancer, who developed bone marrow metastasis complicated by severe bone marrow suppression one year following surgery. Such patients are not sensitive to endocrine therapy and chemotherapy poses great risks due to poor performance status and severe bone marrow suppression. The tentative administration of trastuzumab monotherapy in the present case was found to improve the patient’s disease condition gradually and provided the patient with the opportunity to accept combined chemotherapy, which was likely to significantly prolong survival and improve the patient’s quality of life.
Trastuzumab treatment is selected on the premise of HER-2 gene amplification or overexpression. In the current case, immunohistochemical or FISH tests were impractical due to the small quantity of malignant cells identified in the bone marrow smears. Therefore, it was not possible to directly evaluate the HER-2 gene amplification in the bone marrow metastatic foci. This is a fairly common problem in clinical practice, however, in this circumstance, the trial use of trastuzumab was essentially the only available treatment with the prospect of effectively controlling the tumor progression. We considered an evaluation of the rationality of trastuzumab treatment to be essential prior to administration. A meta-analysis showed that the HER-2 gene inconsistency rate between the metastatic and primary foci of breast cancer was ~5.54% (17). According to this result, it is reasonable to guide treatment based on the HER-2 test results of primary foci when the HER-2 gene amplification of the metastatic foci cannot be obtained.
In conclusion, when sufficient clinical evidence for HER-2 gene amplification is available, trastuzumab may be considered as a beneficial treatment option for breast cancer patients with metastases in whom chemotherapy and endocrine therapy are not suitable.
References
Braun S, Vogl FD, Naume B, et al: A pooled analysis of bone marrow micrometastasis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 353:793–802. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Janni W, Rack B, Kasprowicz N, Scholz C and Hepp P: DTCs in breast cancer: clinical research and practice. Recent Results Cancer Res. 195:173–178. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kiliçkap S, Erman M, Dinçer M, Aksoy S, Harputluoğlu H and Yalçin Y: Bone marrow metastasis of solid tumors: Clinicopathological evaluation of 73 cases. Turk J Cancer. 37:85–88. 2007. | |
Yovtchev YP, Minkov GA, Petrov AT, Nikolov SS and Vlaykova TI: Epithelial cells expressing cytokeratins-19 and bone marrow micrometastases in patients with breast cancer at the time of primary surgery: clinical outcome during long-term follow-up. Breast Cancer. Oct 29–2012.(Epub ahead of print). | |
Singletary SE, Allred C, Ashley P, et al: Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 20:3628–3636. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Goldhirsch A, Glick JH, Gelber RD, Coates AS and Senn HJ: Meeting highlights: International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer. Seventh International Conference on Adjuvant Therapy of Primary Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 19:3817–3827. 2001. | |
Bjelic-Radisic V, Stöger H, Winter R, Beham-Schmid C and Petru E: Long-term control of bone marrow carcinosis and severe thrombocytopenia with standard-dose chemotherapy in a breast cancer patient: a case report. Anticancer Res. 26:1627–1630. 2006.PubMed/NCBI | |
Ballot J, McDonnell D and Crown J: Successful treatment of thrombocytopenia due to marrow metastases of breast cancer with weekly docetaxel. J Natl Cancer Inst. 95:831–832. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Rodriguez-Kraul R, Hortobagyi GN, Buzdar AU and Blumenschein GR: Combination chemotherapy for breast cancer metastatic to bone marrow. Cancer. 48:227–232. 1981. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dady PJ, Gazet JC, Ford HT and Powles TJ: Combination chemotherapy for thrombocytopenia with bone marrow metastases from breast cancer. Br Med J. 1:5541977. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hudziak RM, Lewis GD, Winget M, Fendly BM, Shepard HM and Ullrich A: p185HER2 monoclonal antibody has antiproliferative effects in vitro and sensitizes human breast tumor cells to tumor necrosis factor. Mol Cell Biol. 9:1165–1172. 1989.PubMed/NCBI | |
Smith I, Procter M, Gelber RD, et al: 2-year follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 369:29–36. 2007.PubMed/NCBI | |
Marty M, Cognetti F, Maraninchi D, et al: Randomized phase II trial of the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab combined with docetaxel in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer administered as first-line treatment: the M77001 study group. J Clin Oncol. 23:4265–4274. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, et al: Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med. 344:783–792. 2001. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vogel CL, Cobleigh MA, Tripathy D, et al: Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 20:719–726. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Tsutani Y, Ohsumi S, Aogi K, et al: A case of metastatic breast cancer with HER2 gene amplification that responded completely to single agent trastuzumab. Breast Cancer. 13:374–377. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Houssami N, Macaskill P, Balleine RL, Bilous M and Pegram MD: HER2 discordance between primary breast cancer and its paired metastasis: tumor biology or test artefact? Insights through meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 129:659–674. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |