Smac/DIABLO expression in human gastrointestinal carcinoma: Association with clinicopathological parameters and survivin expression
- Authors:
- Published online on: October 9, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2014.2598
- Pages: 2581-2586
Abstract
Introduction
Second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases/direct inhibitor of apoptosis-binding protein with low pI (Smac/DIABLO) is a mitochondrial apoptogenic molecule that is released from the mitochondria in response to apoptotic stress. Smac/DIABLO is known to antagonize the function of inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs), including X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP), cellular IAP1/2 and survivin (1–7). The lack of Smac/DIABLO expression may inhibit apoptosis in cancer cells, promoting survival. Previous studies have indicated that decreased levels of Smac/DIABLO correlate with cancer progression. Smac/DIABLO is considered a potent therapeutic target (8–11). However, the clinical significance of Smac/DIABLO in various cancers remains unclear.
Survivin, a member of the IAP family, exhibits a dual cellular function as an inhibitor of apoptosis and a regulator of mitosis. The anti-apoptotic effect of survivin is associated with the inhibition of caspase activity. Furthermore, survivin also acts as a chromosome passenger protein, regulating the G2 and M phases of the cell cycle (12–17). High levels of survivin expression are found in numerous embryonic tissues and in the majority of human tumors. By contrast, extremely low level or undetectable levels of expression are found in differentiated adult tissues. As a result, survivin may prove to be a marker for tumor progression and prognosis (18–20).
Apoptosis is a primary biochemical cell-death pathway that is critical for normal tissue homeostasis, cellular differentiation and development (21,22). Apoptosis is regulated by the activity of caspases via two possible pathways, the death receptor-mediated apoptotic pathway (extrinsic pathway, involving caspase 8) and the mitochondrial-mediated apoptotic pathway (intrinsic pathway, involving caspase 9) (21–23). Generally, IAPs suppress apoptosis via the inhibition of caspase activation.
The expression of cleaved caspase (CC)8 and 9, microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3), an autophagy marker, and survivin in gastric and colorectal carcinomas has been investigated to elucidate the cell death pathway (24,25). Results from our previous studies revealed that the expression of CC9 in colorectal carcinoma was significantly lower than that in gastric carcinoma (P<0.0001) (24). By contrast, the expression of LC3 and survivin in colon carcinoma was significantly higher than that in gastric carcinoma (P<0.0001 and P<0.01, respectively) (24,25). These results indicated that different cellular death pathways are activated in gastric and colorectal carcinomas (24).
In the present study, the expression of Smac/DIABLO in gastric and colorectal carcinoma was examined using immunohistochemistry. Furthermore, the association between Smac/DIABLO expression and clinicopathological parameters was investigated. Additionally, the correlation between the expression of Smac/DIABLO and survivin was elucidated.
Materials and methods
Tissue samples
Surgically resected tumor tissues were collected from the archives of the Department of Diagnostic Pathology of the Osaka Red Cross Hospital (Osaka, Japan) and the Kobe Central Hospital of Social Insurance (Kobe, Japan). A total of 72 advanced gastric adenocarcinomas (36 well- to moderately-differentiated and 36 poorly-differentiated) and 78 colorectal adenocarcinomas (68 well- to moderately-differentiated and 10 poorly-differentiated) were analyzed for Smac/DIABLO expression by immunohistochemistry. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Kobe University Graduate School of Health Sciences (Kobe, Japan). The tumors were classified according to the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification of malignant tumors (TNM 2009) (26). All specimens were preserved in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin. Sections that were 3-μm thick were cut consecutively and mounted on aminopropyltriethoxysilane-coated slides.
Immunohistochemical staining
Smac/DIABLO expression was analyzed using immunohistochemistry. The tissue sections were deparaffinized with xylene (Nacalai Tesque, Inc., Kyoto, Japan) and dehydrated using a graded series of ethanol solutions. Antigen retrieval was performed by immersing the slides in 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 7.0; Nacalai Tesque, Inc.) and heating for 10 min in a pressure cooker (Tefal, Haute-Savoie, France). The sections were then cooled at room temperature in a soaking solution (10 mM citrate buffer; pH 7.0; Nacalai Tesque, Inc.) for 30 min. Next, the sections were washed with water, followed by 10 mM phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.2). Following blocking with 0.25% casein in PBS (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), the sections were incubated with a mouse monoclonal antibody against Smac/DIABLO (1:1,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, USA) overnight at room temperature. The sections were then rinsed with PBS. To detect Smac/DIABLO, the sections were incubated with Histofine Simple Stain MAX-PO (Nichirei Bioscience Inc., Tokyo, Japan) for 1 h at room temperature. The reaction products were then developed using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) and counterstained using Mayer’s hematoxylin (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). For the negative control, a section was treated as described above, but PBS was used instead of the primary antibody.
Evaluation of immunostaining
Sections were considered positive for Smac/DIABLO if cytoplasmic staining was observed. A mean percentage of positive tumor cells was determined in ≥5 areas at a magnification of ×400 and assigned to the following categories: 0, negative; 1, <30%; 2, 30–69%; and 3, ≥70%. The intensity of Smac/DIABLO immunostaining was scored as follows: 1, weak; 2, moderate; and 3, intense. A final score was obtained by calculating the sum of these two scores. Cases with final scores of <5 were considered to exhibit low expression, whereas cases with final scores of ≥5 were considered to exhibit high expression.
Statistical analysis
Differences in the expression of Smac/DIABLO between gastric and colorectal adenocarcinomas, well- to moderately-differentiated and poorly-differentiated adenocarcinomas, patient age and gender, as well as lymphatic and vascular invasion were evaluated using the χ2 and Fisher’s exact tests. The correlation between marker expression and tumor location, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis and pathological stage were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Spearman’s rank correlation was used to assess the correlation between the different markers. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Expression of Smac/DIABLO in gastric and colorectal carcinomas
Smac/DIABLO expression was predominantly observed in the cytoplasm (Fig. 1). Smac/DIABLO-positive staining was observed in 46% (33/72) of gastric carcinomas. Smac/DIABLO expression was higher in well- to moderately-differentiated specimens (50%) compared with poorly-differentiated specimens (42%), however, no significant differences were identified (Table I).
Smac/DIABLO-positive staining
Smac/DIABLO-positive staining was observed in 69% (54/78) of colorectal carcinomas. The expression of Smac/DIABLO was significantly higher in colorectal carcinoma than in gastric carcinoma (P<0.01). Smac/DIABLO expression was higher in well- to moderately-differentiated specimens (71%) compared with poorly-differentiated specimens (60%), however, no significant differences were identified.
Correlation between Smac/DIABLO expression and clinicopathological parameters
Tables II and III present the associations between Smac/DIABLO protein expression and the clinicopathological parameters. In gastric carcinomas, none of the parameters of patient age, gender, tumor location, depth of invasion, lymph-node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion or pathological stage were found to be associated with the positive expression of Smac/DIABLO. In colorectal carcinomas, the level of Smac/DIABLO expression was significantly higher in cases without vascular invasion than in the cases with vascular invasion (P<0.05). However, none of the other parameters of patient age, gender, tumor location, depth of invasion, lymph-node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, or pathological stage were found to be associated with positive Smac/DIABLO expression. Although no significant difference was identified between the majority of the clinicopathological parameters and the expression of Smac/DIABLO, a trend towards an association between a decreased expression level of Smac/DIABLO and tumor stage was identified.
 | Table IICorrelation between Smac/DIABLO expression and clinicopathological parameters in gastric adenocarcinomas. |
| Table IIICorrelation between Smac/DIABLO expression and clinicopathological parameters in colorectal adenocarcinomas. |
Association between Smac/DIABLO expression in gastric and colorectal carcinomas
A correlation was identified between Smac/DIABLO and nuclear survivin (r=0.245; P<0.01) in well- to moderately-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas. However, in all cases, the expression of Smac/DIABLO was not significantly associated with survivin expression (P=0.08).
Discussion
In the present study, the expression of Smac/DIABLO in gastric and colorectal carcinomas was investigated and compared by immunohistochemistry. Smac/DIABLO-positive staining was observed in 46% (33/72) and 69% (54/78) of gastric and colorectal carcinomas, respectively. These results revealed that the expression of Smac/DIABLO was significantly higher in colorectal carcinoma than in gastric carcinoma (P<0.01). Regarding the association between Smac/DIABLO expression and tumor type, Yoo et al (8) analyzed archival tissues of 100 carcinomas and 50 sarcomas from various origins using immunohistochemistry. The study reported that Smac/DIABLO was differentially expressed among cancer types and indicated that gastric, colorectal and ovarian carcinomas exhibited a high frequency of Smac/DIABLO expression, whereas Smac/DIABLO expression in prostate carcinoma and non-small cell lung carcinoma was low. According to previous studies, the positive rates of expression in gastric and colorectal carcinomas are 13–70% and 66–90%, respectively (9,10,27–29). Taken together, these studies indicate that Smac/DIABLO expression in colorectal carcinoma is higher than that in gastric carcinoma, however, differences may be observed due to the different counting methods used.
The results of the present study demonstrated that Smac/DIABLO expression in well- to moderately-differentiated gastric and colorectal carcinomas was higher than that in poorly-differentiated adenocarcinomas. However, no statistically significant difference was identified. Kim et al (27) reported that Smac/DIABLO expression was associated with a higher proportion of diffuse histology types than overall cases (intestinal, diffuse and mixed types). By contrast, Shibata et al (28) identified a significant correlation between Smac/DIABLO expression and tumor differentiation (P<0.0001), whereby patients with high Smac/DIABLO expression presented more differentiated tumors. Yoo et al (8) identified no correlation between histological subtype (diffuse type vs. intestinal type) and the expression of Smac/DIABLO (8). Based on these results, we hypothesized that there is no association between the expression of Smac/DIABLO and tumor differentiation in gastric and colorectal carcinomas.
Furthermore, the association between Smac/DIABLO expression and clinicopathological parameters was investigated in the present study. In colorectal carcinomas, the level of Smac/DIABLO expression was significantly higher in the cases without vascular invasion than in the cases with vascular invasion (P<0.05). However, this association was not identified in gastric carcinoma. Previous studies have demonstrated that Smac/DIABLO expression is associated with a good prognosis and low tumor stage (8–11). In the present study, a trend towards an association between decreased Smac/DIABLO expression and pathological stage in gastric and colorectal carcinomas was observed, however, no statistically significant difference was identified. Endo et al (9) reported that no significant difference was present between the two Smac/DIABLO-positive and -negative tumor groups with respect to tumor size, tumor location, histological differentiation and lymphatic and venous invasion. The clinical significance of Smac/DIABLO expression in various cancers remains unclear. Therefore, additional comprehensive studies are required to elucidate the clinical significance of Smac/DIABLO expression in gastric and colorectal carcinomas.
In the present study, the expression of Smac/DIABLO and nuclear survivin were found to correlate in well- to moderately-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas (r=0.245; P<0.01). De Oliveira Lima et al (30) identified a correlation between the expression of survivin and Smac/DIABLO in colorectal carcinoma using immunohistochemistry. The results of the present study only identified a correlation in well- to moderately-differentiated cases, however, the correlation was not observed in all colorectal cancer cases. By contrast, Kim et al (27) revealed that Smac/DIABLO expression was not associated with survivin, whereas Smac/DIABLO expression was found to inversely correlate with the expression of XIAP, an IAP, using immunohistochemistry. To the best of our knowledge, only a small number of studies have demonstrated the association between Smac/DIABLO and survivin expression using immunohistochemistry. Endo et al (9) proposed that the decrease of Smac/DIABLO expression is an independent factor of poor prognosis for colorectal cancer patients, while other studies have indicated that survivin may be a marker for tumor progression and prognosis (5,31,32). Survivin is found in the nucleus and cytoplasm. Nuclear survivin is considered a promoter of cell proliferation, whereas cytoplasmic survivin is considered to exhibit cytoprotective effects (16,33), however, the mechanisms involved remain unclear. Previous studies have indicated that nuclear and cytoplasmic survivin expression is associated with an improved prognosis in gastric carcinomas. By contrast, in colorectal carcinoma, the upregulation of cytoplasmic survivin is associated with a poor prognosis (31,32,34–37). However, there is no disagreement between the results of previous studies and the present study. At present, the association between survivin or Smac/DIABLO and the clinical prognosis remains controversial. Thus, further studies are required to confirm the association between Smac/DIABLO expression and nuclear or cytoplasmic survivin expression.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that the expression of Smac/DIABLO was significantly higher in colorectal carcinoma than in gastric carcinoma. Additionally, a correlation was found between the expression of Smac/DIABLO and nuclear survivin in well- to moderately-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas (r=0.245; P<0.01). Based on these results, we hypothesized that gastric and colorectal carcinomas differ in their levels of Smac/DIABLO expression. These results, in addition to our previous results, indicate that not only LC3 and survivin expression levels, but also Smac/DIABLO expression levels, are significantly higher in colorectal carcinoma than in gastric carcinoma (24,25). We hypothesized that the expression of Smac/DIABLO in colorectal carcinoma may be upregulated to suppress the anti-apoptotic effect of survivin. Furthermore, the results of this study indicate that the analysis of Smac/DIABLO, survivin and LC3 expression in colorectal carcinoma is likely to aid cancer therapy due to the involvement of these markers in apoptosis and/or autophagy.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr Masayuki Shintaku and Dr Toshihiko Miyake for their kind support. This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (grant no. 23590396) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
