Paratesticular sarcomas: A report of seven cases
- Authors:
- Published online on: October 23, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2014.2629
- Pages: 308-312
Abstract
Introduction
As the paratesticular region contains various structures, including the epididymis, spermatic cord, tunica vaginalis and strong fat-ligament-muscle supporting tissues, it may give rise to a number tumor types with various behaviors (1). Tumor variability may also be due to the Wolffian duct origin of the testis appendages, including the spermatic cord. The most significant feature of the paratesticular region is that it is the origin of a small number of tumors with rich diversity.
The majority of the masses within the scrotum in adults are of testicular origin. Paratesticular masses account for 2–3% and sarcomas account for ~30% of all scrotal masses (1–4). The most common type of sarcoma is liposarcoma, followed by leiomyosarcoma (LMS), rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and fibrosarcoma (1–6). To the best of our knowledge, only one instance of low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma in a paratesticular location has been previously reported (7).
Determining the association between the paratesticular mass and the testicle, and differentiation between benign and malignant masses using radiology is challenging, therefore the lesions are usually considered to be malignant and radical orchiectomy with high ligation is used. The prognosis is often poor, as recurrence and metastasis are common, and the mechanism and outcome of regional lymph node resection, radiotherapy and chemotherapy is unclear. The present study reports seven cases of paratesticular sarcoma and emphasizes the significant clinical and histological features.
Case reports
Seven cases of paratesticular sarcoma diagnosed at the Pathology Department of the Istanbul Education and Research Hospital (Istanbul, Turkey) are retrospectively investigated. Hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemical staining of the cases were reevaluated and accurately diagnosed according to the recent World Health Organization classification (8). The clinical information of the patients was obtained from the patient files. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. All patients had been referred to the Urology clinic at Istanbul Education and Research Hospital with a growing scrotal mass. Excisional biopsy and simple orchiectomy were performed in cases three and four and the two patients were subsequently diagnosed with fibromyxoid sarcoma. Radical orchiectomy was performed in the other five cases. Cases one, two and three did not receive any additional treatment, whereas chemotherapy and radiotherapy was adminstered to case five. In cases four, six and seven, re-excision was performed due to recurrence, and chemotherapy and radiotherapy were adminsitered following re-excision.
The clinical features are summarized in Table I. The macroscopic and histological characteristics of the cases were as follows: The lesions in cases one and two consisted of large yellow (lipomatous) and well-delineated areas, with occasional tan-gray colored (leiomyosarcomatous) areas. The diameter of the leiomyosarcomatous area was 8 cm in case one and 5 cm in case two. In addition, a few gray-colored nodules, the largest with a 1 cm diameter, were present in case two. A homologous pattern consisting of well-differentiated liposarcoma, comprising predominantly spindle cells, was present in each case (Fig. 1). The heterologous pattern consisted of a LMS and meningothelial-like whorl component in each case and a low-grade chondrosarcoma component in case one was also present (Figs. 2 and 3). Immunohistochemical staining of the cells revealed that the whorl pattern area was positive for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA; Fig. 4). A strong positive result for cluster of differentiation (CD)34 was observed in the spindle cells within the spindle cell liposarcoma areas, regarded as the homologous component (Fig. 5). The two cases were diagnosed as leiomyosarcomatosis and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) containing whorl-pattern areas.
Cases three and four exhibited nodular, well-delineated tumors with surgical border invasion. Microscopy revealed the histology to be similar in the two cases, with the prominent features consisting of a collagen and myxoid zone, mixed with bland spindle-like fibroblastic cells and a whorl pattern, and arcades of curvilinear blood vessels (Figs. 6 and 7). The cellularity of the tumors varied from extremely low to moderate. Pleomorphism and mitosis were present in the nuclei in a focal area in case four (Fig. 8). Immunohistochemical staining for vimentin and MUC4 yielded a positive result in the two cases, together with focal CD34 and EMA positivity. The patients were diagnosed with low-grade fibomyxoid sarcoma.
The masses in cases five and six were well-circumscribed and nodular, with long bundles that were parallel or perpendicular to each other. The cell cytoplasm was strongly eosinophilic and the nuclei were generally spindle shaped, with one blunt end. Mitosis was not frequent, with 1–3 mitoses per 10 high power fields. Necrosis was observed in focal areas and pleomorphism was moderate. Immunohistochemical staining for smooth muscle actin and desmin yielded a positive result. The two cases were diagnosed as LMS.
Macroscopically, the mass in case seven had infiltrative borders, and, microscopically, was rich in spindle cells, with small bundles and storiform patterns. The tissue also contained large pleomorphic cells, with large eosinophilic cytoplasm in certain areas. Immunohistochemical staining yielded a positive result for vimentin only. This case was diagnosed as undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma.
Discussion
Paratesticular sarcomas are rare and account for ~2% of all soft tissue sarcomas (9,10). No clear approach is available regarding their behavior and treatment due to their rarity. Liposarcoma and LMS are the most common sarcomas (1–6). RMS is more frequent in younger patients (6). The development of various paratesticular neoplasia is due to the differing complex structures in the region. In addition, embryological development of the spermatic cord, the most common tumor localization, and the other testicular adnexal structures from the Wolffian duct may be responsible for this histological diversity.
The histological features of the three cases diagnosed with LMS and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma were typical and created no diagnostic problems. However, the two DDLS cases exhibited extremely rare histological features.
Although the LMS and whorl patterns observed in the DDLS cases is not common, they have been described in previous studies (11–13). Leiomyosarcomatous areas were observed in each of the DDLS cases. The cases exhibited low-grade morphology and extremely low rates of mitosis, with mild pleomorphism in focal areas. The positive immunohistochemical staining for EMA in the whorl pattern areas was noteworthy and suggested perineural or meningeal differentiation. Meningothelial whorl-like morphology is less frequently observed than LMS. EMA was present in each case and, to the best of our knowledge, these are the first DDLS cases positive for EMA to be reported.
A further feature of the DDLS cases was the dominant spindle cell liposarcoma as a homologous component. The denomination of spindle cell liposarcoma remains controversial; certain authors use spindle-cell neoplasm or spindle cell lipoma-like neoplasm (14), and the recommended name for certain lesions was fibrosarcoma-like lipoid neoplasm, as determined in a report published by Deylup et al (15). The authors who recommend these names do not classify these tumors as liposarcoma, however, lipoblasts were observed. The two DDLS cases in the present study were rich in spindle cell lipoma-like (spindle cell liposarcoma) areas with strong cytoplasmic CD34-positivity, as well as rich in lipoblasts. These areas, which were the homologous component for DDLS, should be classified as spindle cell liposarcoma.
Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma is a relatively rare sarcoma (16–17). The upper extremities and the torso are the most frequent locations, however, no paratesticular localization has been previously reported. Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma usually exhibits variable microscopic findings, with bland fibroblasts, whorls, linear sequencing and less cellular myxoid sections in certain areas (16). Mitosis and necrosis are rare. One of the present cases exhibited typical features of low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma, while case four exhibited pleomorphism in focal areas that were also rich in mitoses.
The accepted treatment for paratesticular masses is radical inguinal orchiectomy, including the surrounding soft tissues. No consensus with regard to regional lymph node excision has been reached, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. In the current study, radical orchiectomy with high ligation was performed for the seven cases. Simple orchiectomy and excisional biopsy were conducted for the two cases with fibromyxoid sarcoma. The two patients with fibromyxoid sarcoma succumbed to the disease within 22 and 43 months, respectively, as there was residual mass and the patients did not accept additional treatment. This emphasizes the importance of radical surgical treatments. No recurrence or metastasis was observed in the two cases of liposarcoma and the improved prognosis of liposarcoma compared with the other sarcomas, or the short clinical follow-up durations may have had an effect on this finding. As four of the seven cases succumbed to the disease and one remains alive with the sarcoma demonstrates the requirement for a multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of paratesticular sarcomas.
In conclusion, the paratesticular region consists of complex structures that can develop various neoplastic formations and patterns. Sarcomas comprise a significant part of paratesticular masses and may exhibit an aggressive clinical course. In older patients, paratesticular sarcomas must be considered for the differential diagnosis of scrotal masses, which do not exhibit a clear association with the testes. Furthermore, clinicians and patients must be informed about the high probability of local recurrence and distant metastasis in paratesticular sarcomas.
References
Lioe TF and Biggart JD: Tumours of the spermatic cord and paratesticular tissue. A clinicopathological study. Br J Urol. 71:600–606. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Varzaneh FE, Verghese M and Shmookler BM: Paratesticular leiomyosarcoma in an elderly man. Urology. 60:11122002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Sogani PC, Grabstald H and Whitmore WF Jr: Spermatic cord sarcoma in adults. J Urol. 120:301–305. 1978.PubMed/NCBI | |
Russo P, Brady MS, Conlon K, Hajdu SI, Fair WR, Herr HW and Brennan MF: Adult urological sarcoma. J Urol. 147:1032–1036. 1992.PubMed/NCBI | |
Khoubehi B, Mishra V, Ali M, Motiwala H and Karim O: Adult paratesticular tumours. BJU Int. 90:707–715. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Soosay GN, Parkinson MC, Paradinas J and Fisher C: Paratesticular sarcomas revisited: a review of cases in the British Testicular Tumour Panel and Registry. Br J Urol. 77:143–146. 1996. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Hansen T, Katenkamp K, Brodhun M and Katenkamp D: Low-grade fibrosarcoma - report on 39 not otherwise specified cases and comparison with defined low-grade fibrosarcoma types. Histopathology. 49:152–160. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW and Mertens F: WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. 5. 4th edition. IARC Press; Lyon: 2013 | |
Stojadinovic A, Leung DH, Allen P, Lewis JJ, Jaques DP and Brennan MF: Primary adult soft tissue sarcoma: time-dependent influence of prognostic variables. J Clin Oncol. 20:4344–4352. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Dotan ZA, Tal R, Golijanin D, Snyder ME, Antonescu C, Brennan MF and Russo P: Adult genitourinary sarcoma: the 25-year Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. J Urol. 176:2033–2038. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pilotti S and Pierotti MA: Well-differentiated liposarcoma with leiomyomatous differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol. 26:1643–1644. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Henricks WH, Chu YC, Goldblum JR and Weiss SW: Dedifferentiated liposarcoma: a clinicopathological analysis of 155 cases with a proposal for an expanded definition of dedifferentiation. Am J Surg Pathol. 21:271–281. 1997. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fanburg-Smith JC and Miettinen M: Liposarcoma with meningothelial-like whorls: a study of 17 cases of a distinctive histological pattern associated with dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Histopathology. 33:414–424. 1998. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mentzel T, Palmedo G and Kuhnen C: Well-differentiated spindle cell liposarcoma (‘atypical spindle cell lipomatous tumor’) does not belong to the spectrum of atypical lipomatous tumor but has a close relationship to spindle cell lipoma: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of six cases. Mod Pathol. 23:729–736. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Deyrup AT, Chibon F, Guillou L, Lagarde P, Coindre JM and Weiss SW: Fibrosarcoma-like lipomatous neoplasm: a reappraisal of so-called spindle cell liposarcoma defining a unique lipomatous tumor unrelated to other liposarcomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 37:1373–1378. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vernon SE and Bejarano PA: Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma: a brief review. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 130:1358–1360. 2006.PubMed/NCBI | |
Folpe AL, Lane KL, Paull G and Weiss SW: Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma and hyalinizing spindle cell tumor with giant rosettes: a clinicopathologic study of 73 cases supporting their identity and assessing the impact of high-grade areas. Am J Surg Pathol. 24:1353–1360. 2000. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |