Response to nab-paclitaxel and nedaplatin in a heavily-metastatic thymic carcinoma: A case report
- Authors:
- Published online on: February 10, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.2953
- Pages: 1715-1718
Abstract
Introduction
Thymic epithelial tumors are a rare form of neoplasm consisting of two primary histological types: Thymoma and thymic carcinomas (1). The lesions form a rare category of heterogeneous lesions, presenting with a large range of pathological and clinical characteristics. Thymomas are the most frequently diagnosed primary anterior mediastinal tumors, with an incidence of 1.5 cases per million individuals (2). Although thymic carcinomas are rarer than thymomas, they are more invasive and have a poorer prognosis. The five-year survival rates for all stages of thymoma and thymic carcinomas are 78 and 40%, respectively (3–5).
Surgical resection, followed by radiation therapy, are the preferred treatments for all subtypes of thymic carcinoma without distant metastasis. Patients with unresectable tumors or metastasis, however, are treated with systemic chemotherapy. Due to the rarity of the disease, a standard chemotherapy regimen for thymic carcinoma is yet to be established (6).
The present study describes a 63-year-old female with thymic carcinoma who underwent a range of antitumor treatments, including surgical resection, post-operative radiotherapy, post-operative chemotherapy with gemcitabine-carboplatin (GC) and gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP), second-line chemotherapy with docetaxel and cisplatin (DP) following relapse, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment, and finally chemotherapy with nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) and nedaplatin. The patient demonstrated a good response to nab-P and remains alive three years post-treatment. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Case report
In August 2011, a 63-year-old female underwent thoracic computed tomography (CT) and was diagnosed with a mass in the upper right mediastinum that measured 7.5×7 cm and was in close proximity to the superior vena cava (Fig. 1A). The patient did not present with any respiratory symptoms, such as a cough or chest pain. Complete resection of the tumor was performed under general anesthetic in September 2011 (Fig. 1B). During surgery, tumor cell invasion into the superior vena cava and left innominate vein, and pericardial adhesion were observed. The pathological evidence established a diagnosis of thymic squamous cell carcinoma (Fig. 2A), with positive lymph nodes under the clavicle. Treatment with GP (1.4 mg gemcitabine, days 1 and 8; 100 mg cisplatin, day 1; one cycle lasting 21 days) and GC (1.4 mg gemcitabine, days 1 and 8; 400 mg carboplatin, day 1; three cycles lasting 63 days). Subsequent to chemotherapy, the patient received post-operative radiotherapy to the mediastinum with a total dosage of 56 Gy (2 Gy/day over 28 days).
At the follow-up visit, the patient had no discomfort and the disease had not progressed. However, in late February 2013, thoracic CT revealed several unequal nodules in the right lung and under the pleura. The disease had recurred following 18 months of progression-free survival. Subsequent to two cycles of chemotherapy with DP (docetaxel, 100 mg on day 1; cisplatin, 100 mg on day 1 for two cycles lasting 42 days), the patient was reexamined. This time, thoracic CT revealed the presence of metastatic lesions in the right lung, which were larger than those previously observed and were considered unsuitable for DP therapy. Paraffin-embedded sections of the thymic carcinoma were then analyzed for the 18–21 mutation of the EGFR gene. The results of the amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) revealed a mutation in L858R of exon 21. The patient was administered gefitinib and a month later was reexamined by thoracic CT. The results indicated progression of the lesion and so treatment was stopped. During the three-month, drug-free observation period, the metastatic lesion in the right lung significantly progressed (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, right-sided pleural effusion, evidence of peritoneal metastasis (Fig. 3B), and symptoms of chest distress and shortness of breath were evident. On August 16, 2013, a percutaneous intrathoracic lung biopsy was performed following a CT scan. The pathological evidence indicated the presence of squamous cell carcinoma, which had originated from the same source as the thymic squamous cell carcinoma (Fig. 2B). In addition, tissues obtained from the lung biopsy were analyzed, but no mutations in the EGFR gene, ALK fusion gene or KIT gene were revealed. At the beginning of September 2013, six cycles of a chemotherapy regimen were initiated, consisting of nab-P and nedaplatin, (nab-P 200 mg on days 1 and 8; nedaplatin 30 mg on days 1–3). Following treatment, the pleural effusion significantly decreased, the lesion in right lung remained stable (Fig. 3C) and the metastatic lesions in the peritoneum were reduced in size (Fig. 3D). The patient demonstrated a good response to nab-P and remains alive three years post-treatment.
Discussion
Thymic carcinoma is a rare cancer with a poor outcome, as it is usually discovered at an advanced stage. Due to its rarity, the optimal treatment regimen for patients with thymic carcinoma is uncertain. Several aggressive, multimodal treatment strategies have been advocated, but future prospective studies with larger numbers of patients are required in order to validate the most effective therapeutic approach (1–3).
Surgical resection is the preferred curative treatment for thymic tumors, with complete resection conferring the most favorable clinical prognosis (7). At diagnosis, almost 30% of patients present with a locally-advanced tumor, dissemination to the pleura and the pericardium, and/or invasion of adjacent intrathoracic components. Resection of the tumor is usually achieved through a median sternotomy, with removal of the thymus and all adjoining mediastinal fat bordered laterally by the phrenic nerves (8).
Due to the rarity of thymic malignancies, knowledge concerning the outcomes of chemotherapy on these lesions has been based upon retrospective studies, the majority of which are outdated. Furthermore, only a limited number of prospective studies have ever been conducted. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2013 guideline on thymomas and thymic carcinomas recommends that first-line treatment should include a cisplatin, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (CAP) regimen, a CAP with prednisone, cisplatin, doxorubicin, vincristine and cyclophosphamide regimen, a cisplatin and etoposide regimen, an etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin regimen, or a carboplatin and paclitaxel (PC) regimen (9). Second-line chemotherapy is suggested to include etoposide, ifosfamide, pemetrexed, octreotide, prednisone, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin, gemcitabine or paclitaxel.
In 2011, Lemma et al (10) conducted a prospective multicenter study in order to investigate the impact of the PC regimen in patients with advanced and previously untreated thymic carcinoma. The study included 23 patients with thymic carcinoma. Non of the patients were in complete remission, five exhibited partial responses and 12 experienced stable disease. The mean progression-free survival time was five months and the median survival time was 20 months. The PC regimen has moderate clinical activity in patients with thymic malignancies, but this appears to be less than expected when compared with anthracycline-based therapy.
In the last ten years, there have been six studies (11–16) that have reported gene mutations in thymic carcinomas, including those in EGFR exons 18–21, HER-2 exons 19–20, Kras exon 2 and KIT exons 9, 11, 13 and 17. The results of these studies revealed that thymic carcinoma gene mutations are rare. A 2008 study tested for the presence of EGFR and KIT gene mutations by direct sequencing in nine and 11 different thymic cancer tissues, respectively (14). One mutation was identified in exon 11 of the KIT gene, but none in the EGFR gene. Another study, which analyzed 48 cases of thymic carcinoma, identified only six that contained KIT gene mutations: Four within exon 11 (V559A, L576P, Y553 N, W557R), one within exon 9 (E490 K) and one within exon 17 (D820E) (15). Targeted molecular therapy, for example, with the TKI sunitinib, is a new paradigm in the treatment of cancer, which may be useful for patients with thymic carcinoma. However, there have only been three case studies to date describing the success of sorafenib and sunitinib against thymic carcinoma (15,17,18). In the present study, an L858R mutation in exon 21 of the EGFR gene was identified in the tissue of the thymic carcinoma, but the patient did not respond to treatment with TKIs. Furthermore, no mutations were identified in the EGFR, ALK fusion or KIT genes in the metastatic tissues of the lung. Therefore, it was concluded that the EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation in the thymic carcinoma tissue was likely to be a false-positive ARMS result.
Nab-P (also known as Abraxane®) has a mean particle size of 130 nm and was originally manufactured with the aim of improving the therapeutic index of paclitaxel (19). In a previous study, nab-P demonstrated a 10-fold increase in the mean concentration of free paclitaxel in the serum compared with solvent-based-paclitaxel (sb-P) alone (19). Nab-P, alone or in combination with carboplatin (nab-P/C), has exhibited positive outcomes in two phase III clinical trials that compared nab-P/C with sb-P plus carboplatin as a first-line treatment for cases of advanced NSCLC (20,21). As a result of these findings, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved nab-P/C as a first-line treatment for locally-advanced or metastatic disease in NSCLC patients unsuitable for radiation therapy or curative surgery (19).
To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to describe the positive response of a patient with thymic carcinoma to nab-P chemotherapy. As the number of effective treatment options for thymic carcinoma is small, a controlled trial, in which nab-P is analyzed for its clinical efficacy, is required in the future.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grants from the ‘Twelve-Five Plan’ of the Major Program of Nanjing Medical Science and Technique Development Foundation (Molecular Mechanism Study on Metastasis and Clinical Efficacy Prediction of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer) and Third Level Training Program of Young Talent Project of Nanjing Health (no. QRX11226), the Nanjing Medical Science and Technology Development Project (no. YKK12127), and the Young Professionals Foundation of Nanjing Chest Hospital.
References
Ströbel P, Marx A, Zettl A and Müller-Hermelink HK: Thymoma and thymic carcinoma: an update of the WHO Classification 2004. Surg Today. 35:805–811. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Engels EA: Epidemiology of thymoma and associated malignancies. J Thorac Oncol. 5(Suppl 4): S260–S265. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
No authors listed. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Thymic Malignancies; August 20–21, 2009; Bethesda, Maryland, USA. J Thorac Oncol. 5(Suppl 4): pp. S259–S370. 2010 | |
Kondo K and Monden Y: Therapy for thymic epithelial tumors: a clinical study of 1,320 patients from Japan. Ann Thorac Surg. 76:878–885. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Masaoka A, Yamakawa Y, Niwa H, et al: Thymectomy and malignancy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 8:251–253. 1994. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ströbel P, Bauer A, Puppe B, et al: Tumor recurrence and survival in patients treated for thymomas and thymic squamous cell carcinomas: a retrospective analysis. J Clin Oncol. 22:1501–1509. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Girard N, Mornex F, Van Houtte P, Cordier JF and van Schil P: Thymoma: a focus on current therapeutic management. J Thorac Oncol. 4:119–126. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Rashid OM, Cassano AD and Takabe K: Thymic neoplasm: a rare disease with a complex clinical presentation. J Thorac Dis. 5:173–183. 2013.PubMed/NCBI | |
NCCN Guidelines on the Treatment of Thymomas and Thymic Carsinomas. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/thymic.pdf. Accessed May 18, 2014 | |
Lemma GL, Lee JW, Aisner SC, et al: Phase II study of carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced thymoma and thymic carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 29:2060–2065. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pan CC, Chen PC and Chiang H: KIT (CD117) is frequently overexpressed in thymic carcinomas but is absent in thymomas. J Pathol. 202:375–381. 2004. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Suzuki M, Chen H, Shigematsu H, et al: Aberrant methylation: common in thymic carcinomas, rare in thymomas. Oncol Rep. 14:1621–1624. 2005.PubMed/NCBI | |
Girard N, Shen R, Guo T, et al: Comprehensive genomic analysis reveals clinically relevant molecular distinctions between thymic carcinomas and thymomas. Clin Cancer Res. 15:6790–6799. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Yoh K, Nishiwaki Y, Ishii G, et al: Mutational status of EGFR and KIT in thymoma and thymic carcinoma. Lung Cancer. 62:316–320. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ströbel P, Bargou R, Wolff A, et al: Sunitinib in metastatic thymic carcinomas: laboratory findings and initial clinical experience. Br J Cancer. 103:196–200. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Schirosi L, Nannini N, Nicoli D, et al: Activating c-KIT mutations in a subset of thymic carcinoma and response to different c-KIT inhibitors. Ann Oncol. 23:2409–2414. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Bisagni G, Rossi G, Cavazza A, et al: Long lasting response to the multikinase inhibitor bay 43–9006 (Sorafenib) in a heavily pretreated metastatic thymic carcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 4:773–775. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li XF, Chen Q, Huang WX and Ye YB: Response to sorafenib in cisplatin-resistant thymic carcinoma: a case report. Med Oncol. 26:157–160. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Gardner ER, Dahut WL, Scripture CD, et al: Randomized crossover pharmacokinetic study of solvent-based paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel. Clin Cancer Res. 14:4200–4205. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Socinski MA, Langer CJ, Okamoto I, et al: Safety and efficacy of weekly nab®-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin as first-line therapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 24:314–321. 2013. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Socinski MA, Bondarenko I, Karaseva NA, et al: Weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin versus solvent-based paclitaxel plus carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: final results of a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 30:2055–2062. 2012. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI |