Multiple liver metastases of pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumor treated with resection following chemotherapy and transcatheter arterial embolization: A case report
- Authors:
- Published online on: February 16, 2015 https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.2967
- Pages: 1733-1738
Abstract
Introduction
Solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) is a rare, nonfunctional neoplasm of the pancreas that occurs most frequently in young females with a mean age of 25 years (90% of all cases occur in female patients) (1). The first case was reported by Frantz in 1959 (2). The tumor may occur anywhere in the pancreas, however, is most frequently identified in the pancreatic body and tail. Histopathologically, SPT is classically defined as a large and encapsulated mass composed of a mixture of cystic and solid areas. Intratumoral hemorrhage is frequent, and calcifications have been reported in ≤30% of cases (3–5). Although SPT is considered to be an indolent lesion with low malignant potential and a favorable prognosis following surgical resection, a number of cases of locally infiltrating and metastatic varieties, and post-surgical recurrences have been reported (1). In 1996, the World Health Organization renamed the tumor as SPT and reclassified it as a low-grade malignant tumor (6). The incidence of SPT is low, accounting for 1–2% of exocrine pancreatic tumors and 5% of cystic pancreatic neoplasms.
The current study reports a case of SPT with multiple liver metastases and local recurrence following distal pancreatectomy for the original lesion; the patient was treated with hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, transarterial embolization (TAE), and surgical resection. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.
Case report
A 33-year-old female was admitted to the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital (Kanazawa, Japan) in December 2006 with abdominal pain and vomiting. A cystic lesion of 10 cm in diameter was detected in the tail of the pancreas as well as multiple liver tumors using abdominal computed tomography (CT) (Fig. 1). In January 2007, distal pancreatectomy was performed at Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital. The pancreatic tumor was diagnosed as SPT on postoperative pathological examination, which revealed that the resected tumors were composed of sheets of bland cells with oval to round nuclei and a focal pseudopapillary appearance. Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis revealed positivity for CD10, CD56, vimentin, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and α-antitrypsin. The multiple liver tumors were hypothesized to be SPT metastases. Following surgery, systemic chemotherapy with gemcitabine (GEM) and S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, was administered. However, the liver metastases gradually enlarged, and the patient was referred to the Department of Gastroenterologic Surgery at the Graduate School of Medicine (Kanazawa, Japan) for hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy in September 2011.
Physical examination identified palpable hard masses of >10 cm in diameter around the umbilical area and right lower quadrant. Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT revealed multiple heterogeneous solid and cystic tumors in the liver, and a large tumor of 15 cm in diameter was identified in the left subphrenic area, indicating local recurrence following distal pancreatectomy (Fig. 2A). The lateral segment of the liver was infiltrated with tumors (Fig. 2B), and the 15-cm diameter tumor had been growing suspended from the posterior segment of the liver (Fig. 2C). Additionally, large tumors were identified in the right subphrenic area in the anteroposterior segment of the liver. Complete surgical resection of the tumors was considered to be impossible, as the tumors were located in close proximity to the major Glisson sheath (Fig. 2A). Examination with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) revealed all of the tumors to have high FDG uptake, with maximum standardized uptake values (SUV max) of 7.7–8.8 (Fig. 3A).
As it was impossible to treat the subphrenic local recurrent tumor with HAI chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy was used in combination. In October 2011, oral S-1 (80 mg/m2) and HAI with GEM (1,000 mg/standard liver volume) were initiated as described in a previous report (7). Following 18 cycles of HAI chemotherapy, the tumors exhibited a 26.3% reduction in size (Fig. 2D–F). Although this result was determined to be stable disease according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines (8), FDG-PET examination revealed obvious reduction of tumoral FDG uptake, and the SUV max was 5.4 in the lesion with the highest uptake (Fig. 3B).
While chemotherapy was effective, a complete resection was not predicted to be successful in this situation, due to the involvement of the major Glisson sheath. For the right subphrenic tumor, transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) was a viable treatment. However, TAE was likely to cause the other tumors to rupture due to post-treatment necrosis. Therefore, TAE was performed for the unresectable right subphrenic liver tumor occupying the anteroposterior segment, and the other tumors were surgically resected once the patient’s condition stabilized post-TAE.
The resected tumors were diagnosed as liver metastases and a local recurrence of SPT on postoperative pathological examination. The tumor specimen was a highly vascular lesion composed of sheets of bland cells with oval to round nuclei, moderate cytoplasm, ill-defined cell borders, and a focal pseudopapillary appearance (Fig. 4A). On immunohistochemical analysis, the tumor cells reacted positively for CD10, CD56, vimentin, NSE, and α-antitrypsin, however, the Ki-67 index was low (1–2%; Fig. 4B–H). Electron microscopy was performed to characterize the nature of the cytoplasmic vacuoles that appeared to be dilated or distended mitochondria; the remaining fractions appeared to be smooth endoplasmic reticulum, consistent with a previous report (Fig. 5). In a number of the small vacuoles, a few cristae could still be identified as mitochondrial, and a gradual transition from the normal mitochondria to those with attenuation of cristae was observed as well as loss of matrix.
The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient is currently under monthly observation at an outpatient clinic and receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with oral S-1 (100 mg, every other day).
Discussion
SPTs of the pancreas are uncommon low-malignant epithelial tumors that are typically identified in adolescent females. Metastatic disease is rare and only occurs in around 10–15% of patients (9–11). Previous studies have indicated the most frequently observed metastatic sites to be the liver and omentum (12). Resection of the primary pancreatic tumors or liver metastases has yielded excellent survival with an overall cure rate of >90% (13–16). The clinical features of SPT are non-specific and are often caused by compression from the tumor. Abdominal pain or discomfort is the most common symptom, followed by back pain, nausea, vomiting, weight loss, and diarrhea (1). A number of patients present with jaundice, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, or other rare symptoms; however, a considerable number of patients exhibit no symptoms, and SPT is identified incidentally during physical examination or on ultrasound, CT, or other imaging examinations (1). Although resection of the tumor yields a five-year survival rate of 97%, local recurrence or distant metastases occur in 10–15% of patients (1).
The primary morphological differential diagnosis for SPT is pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Traditionally, negative staining for neuroendocrine markers, in particular chromogranin A, has been considered crucial to this distinction. However, a recent study demonstrated aberrant nuclear staining for β-catenin and a loss of membranous expression of E-cadherin with aberrant nuclear localization of the cytoplasmic domain in all pancreatic SPT cases analyzed (17). In this study, the majority of pancreatic SPTs were also strongly positive for vimentin (100%), β-catenin nuclear stain (100%), CD10 (96%), progesterone receptor (79%), CD56 (75%), cytokeratin (28%), synapthophysin (26%), and chromogranin A (15%) (17). In the present case, CD10, CD56, and vimentin were strongly positive.
At present, no consistent clinical or histological criteria has been established to predict the biological behavior of SPT. Invasion of blood vessels, peritoneal infiltration, invasion of adjacent structures, a high degree of cellular polymorphism, and an elevated mitotic rate are characteristics proposed to be associated with metastases and recurrence. However, the absence of these features does not preclude malignant behavior. In the present case, the patient exhibited multiple liver metastases at initial presentation in the absence of malignant histological behavior.
The current study demonstrates that SPT is an indolent tumor with an excellent prognosis and that surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment, even in the presence of local invasion and extrapancreatic involvement. Indeed, involvement of the surgical margins (R1) does not appear to be associated with a poor outcome. In previously reported studies, ≤20% of the cases have exhibited liver metastases at the time of resection, however, the overall five-year survival rate remains >95% (11). In the present patient, as the liver metastases were diffuse, radical excision of these metastases was not possible. Therefore, combination therapy with TAE and chemotherapy was selected for treatment of the remnant liver tumor.
The value of chemotherapy for patients with SPT remains unknown, however, a number of anecdotal studies have reported its benefit (13,18–20) and lack of benefit (9,21,22). Two cases involving resectable tumors were subjected to chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (19) or GEM (20), but in the latter case, previous treatment with 5-FU and radiation had failed to decrease the tumor size. Radiotherapy is occasionally used for the treatment of unresectable tumors or as an adjuvant treatment following tumor resection (13). Two cases of radiosensitivity in unresectable tumors have been reported (23,24). Kanter et al reported the advantages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with GEM for a large SPT (25). In another report, a patient who presented with a large SPT arising from the pancreatic body and tail (with gastric wall infiltration and para-aortic lymphadenopathy) was treated with GEM and cisplatin. During this therapy, the tumor regressed by >50%, with disappearance of the para-aortic lymphadenopathy and posterior gastric wall infiltration; the patient subsequently underwent full surgical resection (26).
In the current patient, oral S-1 and HAI with GEM were administered, which resulted in the reduction of tumor size on CT and an obvious reduction of FDG uptake on FDG-PET analysis. It was originally proposed that S-1 and GEM had been invalidated as treatment options based on their ineffective use at the previous hospital, however, it is possible that a sufficient amount had not been administered due to patient complaints and side effects. In the Department of Gastroenterologic Surgery at the Graduate School of Medicine, combination treatment with oral S-1 and HAI using GEM was effective. However, there is a possibility that oral S-1 administration alone was effective in treating the local recurrence at the left diaphragm, which was not reached by the arterial infusion of GEM but nonetheless decreased slightly in size. Therefore, oral S-1 was used for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.
Transarterial tumor embolization and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization are seldom used to treat SPT or similar pancreatic neoplasms (21,22,27). Among previous cases, one patient experienced a significant reduction in metastases of the right lobe (21), one succumbed to the disease following the procedure (27), and one patient’s disease remained unchanged (22). Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is also a seldom-used modality (22,28,29). RFA is a safe and effective treatment for multiple unresectable liver metastases of SPT (29). However, incomplete RFA may induce dedifferentiation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of the tumor (30,31). Therefore, it is advisable to limit the use of RFA to unresectable and small lesions.
In the current study, TAE was performed for residual liver tumors prior to surgical resection. Oral S-1 was subsequently administered as postoperative chemotherapy, and additional TAE is planned. In the future, if the central region of the liver enlarges, surgery for the residual right lobe tumor may become possible.
In conclusion, this case demonstrates one method of treatment for SPT: Preoperative chemotherapy with GEM HAI in combination with oral S-1 and TAE. If complete resection can be achieved, the majority of patients with SPT have a favorable prognosis. In patients with unresectable metastases from SPT, it is crucial to perform systematic multimodal treatment, with a combination of surgery, chemotherapy and interventional radiology, to maximize treatment success.
References
Sperti C, Berselli M, Paasquali C, Pastorelli D and Pedrazzoli S: Aggressive behavior of solid-pseudopapillary tumor of pancreas in adults: a case report and review of the literature. World J Gastroenterol. 14:960–965. 2008. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Frantz VK: Tumor of the pancreas. blumerg CW: atlas of tumor pathology Washington, DC: US Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; pp. 32–33. 1959 | |
Cantisani KM, Mortele KJ, Levy A, et al: MR imaging features of solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas in adult and pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentogenol. 181:395–401. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Coleman KM, Doherty MC and Bigler SA: Solid-pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas. Radiographics. 23:1644–1648. 2003. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Vargas-Serrano B, Dominguez-Ferreras E and Chinchon-Espino D: Four cases of solid pseudopapillary tumor of pancreas: imaging findings and pathological correlations. Eur J Radiol. 58:132–139. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Kloppel G, Solcia E, Longnecker DS, et al: Histological typing of tumors of the exocrine pancreas. sobin LH: world health organization international histological classification of rumors. 2nd ed. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer; pp. 15–22. 1996 | |
Tajima H, Ohta T, Kitagawa H, et al: Pilot study of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil for patients with postoperative liver metastases from pancreatic cancer. Exp Ther Med. 2:265–269. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al: New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 45:228–247. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar | |
Martin RC, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF and Conlon KC: Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: a surgical enigma? Ann Surg Oncol. 9:35–40. 2002. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Pettinato G, Manivel JC, Ravetto C, et al: Papillary cystic tumor of the pancreas. a clinicopathologic study of 20 cases with immunohistochemical, ultrastructual and flow cytometric observations and a review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol. 98:478–488. 1992.PubMed/NCBI | |
Tang LH, Aydin H, Brennaan MF and Klimstra DS: Clinically aggressive solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: a report of two cases with components of undifferentiated carcinoma and a comparative clinicopathologic analysis of 34 conventional cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 29:512–519. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Mao C, Guvendi M, Demenico DR, Kim K, Thomford NR and Howard JM: Papillary cystic and solid tumors of the pancreas: a pancreatic embryonic tumor? studies of three cases and cumulative review of the worlds’ literature. Surgery. 118:821–828. 1995. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Matsunou H and Konishi F: Papillary-cystic neoplasm of the pancreas. A clinicopathologic study concerning the tumor aging and malignancy of nine cases. Cancer. 65:283–291. 1990. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Goh BK, Tan YM, Cheow PC, et al: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas: an updated experiences. J Surg Oncol. 95:640–644. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Ueda N, Nagakawa T, Ohta T, et al: Clinicopathological studies on solid and cystic tumors of the pancreas. Gastroenterol Jpn. 26:497–502. 1991.PubMed/NCBI | |
Salvia R, Bassi C, Festa L, et al: Clinical and biological behavior of pancreatic solid pseudopapillary tumors: report on 31 consecutive patients. J Surg Oncol. 95:304–310. 2007. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Nguyen QN, Johns LA, Gill JA, et al: Clinical and immunohistochemical features of 34 solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 26:267–274. 2011. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Shimizu M, Matsumoto T, Hirokawa M, Monobe Y, Iwamoto S, Tsunoda T and Manabe T: Solid-pseudopapillary carcinoma of the pancreas. Pathol Int. 49:231–234. 1999. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Strauss JF, Hirsch VJ, Rubey CN and Pollock M: Resection of a solid and papillary epithelial neoplasm of the pancreas following treatment with CIS-platinum and 5-fluorouracil: a case report. Med Pediatr Oncol. 21:365–367. 1993. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Maffuz A, Bustamante FT, Silva JA and Torres-Vargas S: Preoperative gemcitabine for unresectable solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas. Lancet Oncol. 6:185–186. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Matsuda Y, Imai Y, Kawata S, Nisikawa M, Miyoshi S, Saito R, Minami Y and Tarui S: Papillary-cystic neoplasm of the pancreas with multiple hepatic metastases: a case report. Gastroenterol JPN. 22:379–384. 1987.PubMed/NCBI | |
Kang CM, Kim KS, Choi JS, Kim H, Lee WJ and Kim BR: Solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas suggesting malignant potential. Pancreas. 32:276–280. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Fried P, Cooper J, Balthazar E, Fazzini E and Newall L: A role for radiotherapy in the treatment of solid and papillary neoplasms of the pancreas. Cancer. 56:2783–2785. 1985. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Zauls JA, Dragun AE and Sharma AK: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for unresectable solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas. Am J Clin Oncol. 29:639–640. 2006. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Kanter J, Wilson DB and Strasberg S: Downsizing to resectability of a large solid and cystic papillary tumor of the pancreas by single-agent chemotherapy. J Pediatr Surg. 44:E23–E25. 2009. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Das G, Bhuyan C, Das BK, et al: Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for papillary solid and cystic neoplasm of pancreas. Indian J Gastroenterol. 23:188–189. 2004.PubMed/NCBI | |
Levy P, Bougaran J and Gayet B: Diffuse peritoneal carcinomas of pseudo-papillary and solid tumor of the pancreas. role of abdominal injury. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 21:789–793. 1997. | |
Huang HI, Shih SC, Chang WH, Wang TE, Chen MJ and Chan YJ: Solid-pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas: clinical experience and literature review. World J Gastroenterol. 11:1403–1409. 2005. View Article : Google Scholar : PubMed/NCBI | |
Li JX, Wu H, Huang JW, Prasoon P and Zeng Y: Synchronous intraoperative radiofrequency ablation for multiple liver metastasis and resection of giant solid pseudopapillary tumors of the pancreas. Chinese Med J. 125:1661–1663. 2012. | |
Tajima H, Ohta T, Okamoto K, et al: Radiofrequency ablation induces dedifferentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 1:91–94. 2010.PubMed/NCBI | |
Tajima H, Ohta T, Shoji Y, et al: Expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers in locally recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation. Exp Ther Med. 1:347–350. 2010. View Article : Google Scholar |